Abstract Report issue for preceding element
The open relativistic two-body problem, when two interacting particles also are in external potentials, is considered in terms of the principle of the least action. Based on the consistent modification of the relativistic version Newton’s third law in external fields, the exact covariant operator equations, which govern dynamics of either a scalar particle or each of the components of the 16 component spinor of spin-1 / 2 1 2 1/2 1 / 2 fermions, depending on the particle type, are derived in the center-mass and relative motion variables, beyond the consideration in the Breit frame only. The class of external fields and interaction potentials, when the two-body problem can be covariantly reformulated in (3+1) phase space of relative motion variables, uncoupled from the center-mass motion of such a system, is outlined. In the case of fermions the new γ 𝛾 \gamma italic_γ -matrix basis generating the Dirac-like equation for the 16 component spinors in the (3+1) phase space is found. The chosen basis allows us to decouple the derived Dirac-like equation into four independent equations governing the dynamics of the four-component spinors. The developed approach is examined in studying the low-energy positronium states in magnetic fields.
Report issue for preceding element
1 Introduction Report issue for preceding element
The relativistic two-body problem, which has actively studied for more than forty years, beginning from 80th Teo71 ; Teo76 ; Droz ; Kal ; Teo78 ; Kom ; Are ; Kir ; Dom78 ; Dom80 ; Sad86-1 ; Sad86-2 ; Sad94 ; Sad89 ; Cra84 ; Cra87 ; Cra90 ; Cra01 ; Cra03 ; Cra06 ; Cra10 ; Bar87 ; Bar91 ; Log , is of great interest now in connection primarily with the indirect searches of the dark matterAgu ; Perez ; Jung ; Ber ; Gel . It also concerns researches when strong magnetic fields play an important role in forming signals from both the astrophysics objectsBro ; Bus ; Dun ; Hard06 and the strong interacting matter, arising in non-central collisions of high energy particlesFuku ; Vor ; Tuc . The value of the magnetic field strength in the latter case is estimated to be about B ∼ 10 18 − 10 19 G similar-to 𝐵 superscript 10 18 superscript 10 19 𝐺 B\sim 10^{18}-10^{19}G italic_B ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 18 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 19 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_G at RHIC and LHC energiesFuku ; Vor ; Tuc what is of the order and more than the squared pion mass. Besides that, magnetic fields play a key role in forming signals from the interior area of neutron starsDun ; Hard06 where the magnetic field strength turns out to be of the same order of magnitude.
Report issue for preceding element
The first attempt to describe the relativistic two-body system was made by summing two free Dirac equations, adding to them interaction potential Brei29 ; Brei30 , that resulted in the relativistic non-invariant Breit equation.
On other hand, the manifestly covariant Bethe-Salpeter equationBSE , which is suitable for solving such kind problems, was found to haveNak the negative normalized solutions in the case of two one half spin particles. The lack of the approaches mentioned above can be eliminated with Dirac’s Hamiltonian constraint techniqueDir ; Ber , decreasing a number of the Hamiltonian variables by means of establishing relations between them. It is achieved due to the Poincare invariant functions containing interaction terms Φ i ( p 1 , m 1 ; p 2 , m 2 , q 12 … ) subscript Φ 𝑖 subscript 𝑝 1 subscript 𝑚 1 subscript 𝑝 2 subscript 𝑚 2 subscript 𝑞 12 … \Phi_{i}(p_{1},m_{1};p_{2},m_{2},q_{12}...) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 12 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT … )
Report issue for preceding element
p i 2 − m i 2 = Φ i ( p 1 , m 1 ; p 2 , m 2 , q 12 , … ) , subscript superscript 𝑝 2 𝑖 subscript superscript 𝑚 2 𝑖 subscript Φ 𝑖 subscript 𝑝 1 subscript 𝑚 1 subscript 𝑝 2 subscript 𝑚 2 subscript 𝑞 12 … \displaystyle p^{2}_{i}-m^{2}_{i}=\Phi_{i}(p_{1},m_{1};p_{2},m_{2},q_{12},...), italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 12 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … ) ,
(1)
where i = 1 , 2 𝑖 1 2
i=1,2 italic_i = 1 , 2 numerates particles, whereas the functions Φ i subscript Φ 𝑖 \Phi_{i} roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT depends on the particle momenta p i subscript 𝑝 𝑖 p_{i} italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and on the parameters q 12 subscript 𝑞 12 q_{12} italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 12 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT characterizing interaction between particles.
Report issue for preceding element
On the other hand, in non-relativistic physics the III-rd Newton law restricts a set of the interaction and external fields which allow to reduce the two-body problem to the single particle dynamics. The similar restrictions dictated by the relativistic version of the III-rd Newton law to external and interaction fields should obviously take place in the relativistic case. The relativistic version of this law is given by a formulaCra84 ; Cra87 ; Cra90 ; Cra01
Report issue for preceding element
P p = 0 , 𝑃 𝑝 0 \displaystyle Pp=0, italic_P italic_p = 0 ,
(2)
whereP 𝑃 P italic_P and p 𝑝 p italic_p are the total and relative momenta of particles. Such a restriction turns out to b the necessary condition of the compatibility of equation in studying of the two-body problem in the constraint dynamics approachDir ; Ber .
Report issue for preceding element
Based on the constraint dynamics ideasDir ; Ber the classical relativistic two-particle system has been studied Droz ; Kal ; Teo78 ; Kom for the first time, where a consistent and covariant approach has been developed for the relativistic canonical Hamiltonian mechanics.
For more than forty years, beginning from 80th, the constraint dynamic approach have been actively and successfully developed in studying the quantum two-body systems, and applied for describing real compound systems in QED and QCD Sad86-1 ; Sad86-2 ; Sad89 ; Cra84 ; Cra87 ; Cra90 ; Cra01 ; Cra03 ; Cra10 . Following the constraint dynamics the two interacting particle systems, involving spin-0 bosons and/or spin-(1/2) fermions, is studied Sad86-1 ; Sad86-2 . The obtained results and is applied to the description of the quarkonium states Sad86-2 . In the framework of the constraint dynamics approach the 4 × 4 4 4 4\times 4 4 × 4 matrix wave function satisfying an equation of the Pauli-Schrodinger type is constructedSad94 . Later, the developed approach was generalized to the case of the N interaction particleSad89 .
Report issue for preceding element
Along with researchesSad86-1 ; Sad86-2 ; Sad89 , by developing previous resultsTeo76 ; Teo78 , the quantum consideration of two spinlessCra84 and spin-1 / 2 1 2 1/2 1 / 2 Cra84 particles under vector and scalar interaction, have been developed, using the constraint mechanics for the two-body Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations. The hyperbolic interaction structure of these equations, established earlierCra84 ; Cra87 , allowsCra90 us to include the pseudoscalar, pseudovector, and tensor interactions in the co responding motion equations. The Hamiltonian formulation of the relativistic N-body problem in a separable two-body basis, in which the particles interact pair-wise through scalar and vector interactions, is developed in Ref.Cra01 . The worked out approachesCra84 ; Cra87 ; Cra90 ; Cra01 have been further applied to researches in a meson spectroscopy Cra06 ; Cra10 , and in nuclear-nuclear collisionsCra03 .
The two-body states in the case of QED interactionBar87 and when the interaction is realized due to a neutral bosonBar91 , has been studied in terms of the action integral in the coordinate representation that leads to the non-covariant Breit-like equation in the coordinate space-time.
Report issue for preceding element
The dynamics of the two-body systems is studied in the Lagrange formalism in the case when such a system consists of two classical relativistic particlesDom78 ; Dom80 .
The singular-Lagrangian approach to the two-body problem is derived thereinDom78 ; Dom80 .
Report issue for preceding element
The relativistic two-particle systems in external fields which consist of scalarDroz00 ; Droz09 and fermionBij00 particles are considered in the context of the covariant separation of the relative and mutual motion such systems. Having been mainly concentrated on the mutual motion and on constraint relations concerning external fieldDroz00 ; Bij00 ; Droz09 , the reconstruction of the relative motion spectrum as well as the spin mixing effect turn out beyond the consideration mentioned aboveDroz00 ; Bij00 ; Droz09 .
Report issue for preceding element
Despite the active use of the relativistic version of the third Newton lawCra84 ; Cra87 ; Cra90 ; Cra01 , the requirements for the interaction potentials that allow to say about the two-body problem in the relativistic case, as well as the modification of the third Newton law in external field potentials, have still remained to be undiscussable. The same concerns arising the special phase space for the two-body system evolution as well as relations between the seed constituent and effective phenomenological potential what are beyond previous considerationsSad86-1 ; Sad86-2 ; Sad89 ; Cra84 ; Cra87 ; Cra90 ; Cra01 ; Cra03 ; Cra10 .
Besides that, even in the absence of external field, the Dirac equation derived in earlierSad86-1 ; Sad86-2 ; Sad89 ; Cra84 ; Cra87 ; Cra90 ; Cra01 ; Cra03 ; Cra10 turn out to be very complicate for analyzing the dynamics of fields in real physical situations. Therefore, the question whether it is possible to find some new relevant γ 𝛾 \gamma italic_γ -matrix basis which allows to simplify the Dirac equation structure in the two-body problem, has remained unsolved.
Report issue for preceding element
In the present paper the two-body problem in the external vector fields is studied in the Lagrange formalism beyond the constraint Hamiltonian dynamics. The exact covariant operator equations governing scalar particles and spin-1 / 2 1 2 1/2 1 / 2 fermions have been derived. The obtained equation are formulated in the standard space-time variables of the relative and center mass motion of the two-body system, beyond the consideration in the Breit frame of reference onlySad86-1 ; Sad86-2 ; Sad89 ; Cra84 ; Cra87 ; Cra90 ; Cra01 ; Cra03 ; Cra10 . The class of interaction and external field potentials when the two-body problem can be covariantly reformulated in (3+1) phase space of the relative motion variables, which are uncoupled from the center mass variables, is pointed out.
Report issue for preceding element
Provided that Newton’s third law occurs, the Klein-Gordon equation, which governs either dynamics of a scalar particle or describes each of a single component of the 16 components spinor of the spin-1 / 2 1 2 1/2 1 / 2 fermion, depending on the particle type, has been derived in the (3+1) phase space. In the case of 1 / 2 1 2 1/2 1 / 2 -spin particles we find a new γ 𝛾 \gamma italic_γ -matrix basis which allows us to go to the Dirac-like equation which is decoupled in four independent equations for four different components of the initial 16 component spinor. In terms of the derived Dirac-like equations the Lagrangian governing the dynamics of two spin-1 / 2 1 2 1/2 1 / 2 fermions in an external field has been found. This Lagrangian generates the conservative fermion current.
Report issue for preceding element
In the case of pure QED the developed approach is applied to studying the low energy states of a positronium in a magnetic field, taking into account spin-mixing effect. It is shown that strong magnetic fields result in essentially reconstructing the spectrum of positronium states and decreasing the life-time of the positronium ground state.
Report issue for preceding element
The paper is organized as follows. The system consisting of two interacting scalar particles in external fields is studied in Section 2. Two interacting particles with spin-1 / 2 1 2 1/2 1 / 2 in external fields are considered in Section 3. Section 4 is devoted to studying the low energy states of a positronium in a strong uniform magnetic field. The last section is the conclusion. The details of some calculations are given in an appendix.
Report issue for preceding element
2 Two interacting spinless particles in external fields Report issue for preceding element
We consider two scalar particles with masses m 1 subscript 𝑚 1 m_{1} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and m 2 subscript 𝑚 2 m_{2} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT which interact by means of vector A i n t ν ( x ) superscript subscript 𝐴 𝑖 𝑛 𝑡 𝜈 𝑥 A_{int}^{\nu}(x) italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_n italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x ) and scalar S i n t ( x ) subscript 𝑆 𝑖 𝑛 𝑡 𝑥 S_{int}(x) italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_n italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) potentials, and which also are in an external vector A e x t ν ( x ) superscript subscript 𝐴 𝑒 𝑥 𝑡 𝜈 𝑥 A_{ext}^{\nu}(x) italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_x italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x ) and scalar S e x t ( x ) subscript 𝑆 𝑒 𝑥 𝑡 𝑥 S_{ext}(x) italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_x italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) potentials. Such external potentials transform the standard confined two-body problem into the open one. The action integral of such a system of particles consists of two terms
Report issue for preceding element
𝔄 = ∑ i = 1 2 λ i 2 ∫ 𝑑 x i ( | π i μ Φ i ( x i ) | 2 − Φ i ∗ ( x i ) ( m i + 𝒮 i ( x i ) ) 2 Φ i ( x i ) ) 𝔄 superscript subscript 𝑖 1 2 subscript 𝜆 𝑖 2 differential-d subscript 𝑥 𝑖 superscript subscript superscript 𝜋 𝜇 𝑖 subscript Φ 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 2 subscript superscript Φ ∗ 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑖 subscript 𝒮 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 2 subscript Φ 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 \displaystyle{\mathfrak{A}}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{2}\frac{\lambda_{i}}{2}\int dx_%
{i}\Big{(}|\pi^{\mu}_{i}\Phi_{i}(x_{i})|^{2}-\Phi^{\ast}_{i}(x_{i})(m_{i}+{%
\cal S}_{i}(x_{i}))^{2}\Phi_{i}(x_{i})\Big{)} fraktur_A = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∫ italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) )
(3b)
π i ν ≡ p i ν + 𝒜 i ν ( x i ) = i ∂ i ν + 𝒜 i ν ( x i ) , subscript superscript 𝜋 𝜈 𝑖 subscript superscript 𝑝 𝜈 𝑖 superscript subscript 𝒜 𝑖 𝜈 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 𝑖 subscript superscript 𝜈 𝑖 superscript subscript 𝒜 𝑖 𝜈 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 \displaystyle\pi^{\nu}_{i}\equiv p^{\nu}_{i}+{\cal A}_{i}^{\nu}(x_{i})=i%
\partial^{\nu}_{i}+{\cal A}_{i}^{\nu}(x_{i}), italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_i ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ,
where i = 1 , 2 𝑖 1 2
i=1,2 italic_i = 1 , 2 enumerates particles, Φ i ( x i ) subscript Φ 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 \Phi_{i}(x_{i}) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) denotes a scalar field, , p i ν = i ∂ i ν = ( i ∂ 0 , − i ∇ ) subscript superscript 𝑝 𝜈 𝑖 𝑖 subscript superscript 𝜈 𝑖 𝑖 superscript 0 𝑖 ∇ p^{\nu}_{i}=i\partial^{\nu}_{i}=(i\partial^{0},\;-i\nabla) italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_i ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_i ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , - italic_i ∇ ) is a particle momentum; g ν μ subscript 𝑔 𝜈 𝜇 g_{\nu\mu} italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the metric tensor which diagonal is d i a g = ( 1 , − 1 , − 1 , − 1 ) 𝑑 𝑖 𝑎 𝑔 1 1 1 1 diag=(1,-1,-1,-1) italic_d italic_i italic_a italic_g = ( 1 , - 1 , - 1 , - 1 ) , whereas x = ( x 0 , 𝒙 ) 𝑥 superscript 𝑥 0 𝒙 x=(x^{0},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}) italic_x = ( italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) . The parameters λ i subscript 𝜆 𝑖 \lambda_{i} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the Lagrange multipliers; 𝒜 i ν ( x i ) superscript subscript 𝒜 𝑖 𝜈 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 {\cal A}_{i}^{\nu}(x_{i}) caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and 𝒮 i ( x i ) subscript 𝒮 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 {\cal S}_{i}(x_{i}) caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) are the vector and scalar potentials acting on the field Φ i ( x i ) subscript Φ 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 \Phi_{i}(x_{i}) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , respectively. These potentials consist of two terms which describe interaction between particles inside the two-body and an external fields acting on each particle independently.
For brevity, the coupling constants are not written explicitly, and are included into the potential 𝒜 i ν ( x i ) superscript subscript 𝒜 𝑖 𝜈 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 {\cal A}_{i}^{\nu}(x_{i}) caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and 𝒮 i ( x i ) subscript 𝒮 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 {\cal S}_{i}(x_{i}) caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) .
Report issue for preceding element
Further consideration requires to discuss the structure of the interaction terms in Eq.(3b ). The fields governing interaction inside the confined two-body problem have to obviously take into account the states of both interaction particle, whereas any external field acting on the each of the considered particles is the same, differing by the coupling constant in the interaction term. Then, we write the interaction potentials as follows
Report issue for preceding element
𝒜 i ν ( x i ) = A i ν ( x i ) + ∫ 𝑑 x j Φ j ∗ ( x j ) A i j ν ( x i − x j ) Φ j ( x j ) ∫ 𝑑 x j Φ j ∗ ( x j ) Φ j ( x j ) , subscript superscript 𝒜 𝜈 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜈 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 differential-d subscript 𝑥 𝑗 subscript superscript Φ ∗ 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑗 subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜈 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑗 subscript Φ 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑗 differential-d subscript 𝑥 𝑗 subscript superscript Φ ∗ 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑗 subscript Φ 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑗 \displaystyle{\cal A}^{\nu}_{i}(x_{i})={A}^{\nu}_{i}(x_{i})+\frac{\int dx_{j}%
\Phi^{\ast}_{j}(x_{j}){A}^{\nu}_{ij}(x_{i}-x_{j})\Phi_{j}(x_{j})}{\int dx_{j}%
\Phi^{\ast}_{j}(x_{j})\Phi_{j}(x_{j})}, caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + divide start_ARG ∫ italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG ∫ italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG ,
(4a)
𝒮 i ( x i ) = S i ( x i ) + ∫ 𝑑 x j Φ j ∗ ( x j ) S i j ( x i − x j ) Φ j ( x ) ∫ 𝑑 x j Φ j ∗ ( x j ) Φ j ( x j ) . subscript 𝒮 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 subscript 𝑆 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 differential-d subscript 𝑥 𝑗 subscript superscript Φ ∗ 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑗 subscript 𝑆 𝑖 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑖 subscript 𝑥 𝑗 subscript Φ 𝑗 𝑥 differential-d subscript 𝑥 𝑗 subscript superscript Φ ∗ 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑗 subscript Φ 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑗 \displaystyle{\cal S}_{i}(x_{i})={S}_{i}(x_{i})+\frac{\int dx_{j}\Phi^{\ast}_{%
j}(x_{j}){S}_{ij}(x_{i}-x_{j})\Phi_{j}(x)}{\int dx_{j}\Phi^{\ast}_{j}(x_{j})%
\Phi_{j}(x_{j})}. caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + divide start_ARG ∫ italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) end_ARG start_ARG ∫ italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG .
(4b)
Here A i ν subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜈 𝑖 {A}^{\nu}_{i} italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and S j subscript 𝑆 𝑗 S_{j} italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denote the potentials affecting the i 𝑖 i italic_i -th particle by an external field, whereas A i j ν subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜈 𝑖 𝑗 {A}^{\nu}_{ij} italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and S i j subscript 𝑆 𝑖 𝑗 S_{ij} italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT supplied by a double subscribe notate the potentials acting by the j 𝑗 j italic_j -th particle on the i 𝑖 i italic_i -the one, inside the two-body system ( i , j = 1 , 2 , i ≠ j formulae-sequence 𝑖 𝑗
1 2 𝑖
𝑗 i,j=1,2,i\neq j italic_i , italic_j = 1 , 2 , italic_i ≠ italic_j ).
All of A i j ν subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜈 𝑖 𝑗 {A}^{\nu}_{ij} italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT depends , in general, on the fields Φ j ( x j ) subscript Φ 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑗 \Phi_{j}(x_{j}) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) . However, we ignore such a dependence, restricting by consideration of the so-called mean field approximation for the two-particle interaction.
Report issue for preceding element
As for the external potentials, to eliminate interaction between external and interaction potential we demand them orthogonality which means the following in the case of the vector potentials
Report issue for preceding element
A i j ν ( A ν ) k = 0 , i , j , k = 1 , 2 . formulae-sequence subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜈 𝑖 𝑗 subscript subscript 𝐴 𝜈 𝑘 0 𝑖 𝑗
𝑘 1 2
\displaystyle{A}^{\nu}_{ij}(A_{\nu})_{k}=0,~{}~{}~{}i,j,k=1,2. italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , italic_i , italic_j , italic_k = 1 , 2 .
(5)
The restrictions to the external scalar potentials will be discussed below in Sec.2.4.
Report issue for preceding element
2.1 Free particles Report issue for preceding element
Let us consider the two-body problem in case of free particle to clarify selection of the Lagrange
multiplier λ 1 , 2 subscript 𝜆 1 2
\lambda_{1,2} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
Report issue for preceding element
We firstly take the Lagrange multipliers to be
Report issue for preceding element
λ 1 = ( ∫ 𝑑 x 2 Φ 2 ∗ ( x 2 ) Φ 2 ( x 2 ) ) , λ 2 = ( ∫ 𝑑 x 1 Φ 1 ∗ ( x 1 ) Φ 1 ( x 1 ) ) . formulae-sequence subscript 𝜆 1 differential-d subscript 𝑥 2 subscript superscript Φ ∗ 2 subscript 𝑥 2 subscript Φ 2 subscript 𝑥 2 subscript 𝜆 2 differential-d subscript 𝑥 1 subscript superscript Φ ∗ 1 subscript 𝑥 1 subscript Φ 1 subscript 𝑥 1 \displaystyle\lambda_{1}=\Big{(}\int dx_{2}\Phi^{\ast}_{2}(x_{2})\Phi_{2}(x_{2%
})\Big{)},~{}~{}~{}\lambda_{2}=\Big{(}\int dx_{1}\Phi^{\ast}_{1}(x_{1})\Phi_{1%
}(x_{1})\Big{)}. italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( ∫ italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) , italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( ∫ italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) .
Then, we introduce the canonically conjugation variables
Report issue for preceding element
P = p 1 + p 2 , p = μ 1 p 2 − μ 2 p 1 , formulae-sequence 𝑃 subscript 𝑝 1 subscript 𝑝 2 𝑝 subscript 𝜇 1 subscript 𝑝 2 subscript 𝜇 2 subscript 𝑝 1 \displaystyle~{}P=p_{1}+p_{2},~{}~{}~{}p=\mu_{1}p_{2}-\mu_{2}p_{1}, italic_P = italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_p = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,
(7a)
p 1 = μ 1 P − p , p 2 = μ 2 P + p , formulae-sequence subscript 𝑝 1 subscript 𝜇 1 𝑃 𝑝 subscript 𝑝 2 subscript 𝜇 2 𝑃 𝑝 \displaystyle p_{1}=\mu_{1}P-p,~{}~{}~{}p_{2}=\mu_{2}P+p, italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P - italic_p , italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P + italic_p ,
(7b)
X = 1 2 ( x 1 + x 2 ) , x = x 2 − x 1 . formulae-sequence 𝑋 1 2 subscript 𝑥 1 subscript 𝑥 2 𝑥 subscript 𝑥 2 subscript 𝑥 1 \displaystyle X=\frac{1}{2}(x_{1}+x_{2}),~{}~{}~{}~{}x=x_{2}-x_{1}. italic_X = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , italic_x = italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
(7c)
where
Report issue for preceding element
μ 1 = 1 2 ( 1 + m 1 2 − m 2 2 M 2 ) , μ 2 = 1 2 ( 1 − m 1 2 − m 2 2 M 2 ) , formulae-sequence subscript 𝜇 1 1 2 1 superscript subscript 𝑚 1 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 2 2 superscript 𝑀 2 subscript 𝜇 2 1 2 1 superscript subscript 𝑚 1 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 2 2 superscript 𝑀 2 \displaystyle\mu_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\left(1+\frac{m_{1}^{2}-m_{2}^{2}}{M^{2}}%
\right),\mu_{2}=\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{m_{1}^{2}-m_{2}^{2}}{M^{2}}\right), italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( 1 + divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) , italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( 1 - divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) ,
(8a)
μ 1 + μ 2 = 1 , M = | p 1 + p 2 | = | P | . formulae-sequence subscript 𝜇 1 subscript 𝜇 2 1 𝑀 subscript 𝑝 1 subscript 𝑝 2 𝑃 \displaystyle\mu_{1}+\mu_{2}=1,~{}~{}~{}~{}M=|p_{1}+p_{2}|=|P|. italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 , italic_M = | italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | = | italic_P | .
(8b)
In Eq. (7a ) P 𝑃 P italic_P and p 𝑝 p italic_p are the total and relative momentum of the two-body system, respectively, while M = | P | = | p 1 + p 2 | 𝑀 𝑃 subscript 𝑝 1 subscript 𝑝 2 M=|P|=|p_{1}+p_{2}| italic_M = | italic_P | = | italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | is its invariant mass. The momenta P , p , 𝑃 𝑝
P,p, italic_P , italic_p , and coordinates X , x 𝑋 𝑥
X,x italic_X , italic_x satisfy the following commutative relations
Report issue for preceding element
[ P j , x k ] = [ p j , X k ] = 0 , subscript 𝑃 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑘 subscript 𝑝 𝑗 subscript 𝑋 𝑘 0 \displaystyle[P_{j},x_{k}]=[p_{j},X_{k}]=0, [ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] = [ italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] = 0 ,
[ P j , X k ] = − i δ j k , [ p j , x k ] = − i δ j k , j , k = 1 , 2 , 3 . formulae-sequence subscript 𝑃 𝑗 subscript 𝑋 𝑘 𝑖 subscript 𝛿 𝑗 𝑘 formulae-sequence subscript 𝑝 𝑗 subscript 𝑥 𝑘 𝑖 subscript 𝛿 𝑗 𝑘 𝑗
𝑘 1 2 3
\displaystyle[P_{j},X_{k}]=-i\delta_{jk},[p_{j},x_{k}]=-i\delta_{jk},~{}j,k=1,%
2,3. [ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] = - italic_i italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , [ italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] = - italic_i italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_j , italic_k = 1 , 2 , 3 .
(9)
In terms of such new variables the action integral becomes to be equal to
Report issue for preceding element
𝔄 + = ∫ 𝑑 X 𝑑 x ∫ 𝑑 X 𝑑 x Φ ∗ ( X , x ) ( p 2 + E w 2 − m w 2 − m 1 2 − m 2 2 M 2 P p ) Φ ( X , x ) , subscript 𝔄 differential-d 𝑋 differential-d 𝑥 differential-d 𝑋 differential-d 𝑥 superscript Φ ∗ 𝑋 𝑥 superscript 𝑝 2 superscript subscript 𝐸 𝑤 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 1 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 2 2 superscript 𝑀 2 𝑃 𝑝 Φ 𝑋 𝑥 \displaystyle{\mathfrak{A}}_{+}=\int dXdx\int dXdx\Phi^{\ast}(X,x)\big{(}p^{2}%
+E_{w}^{2}-m_{w}^{2}-\frac{m_{1}^{2}-m_{2}^{2}}{M^{2}}Pp\big{)}\Phi(X,x), fraktur_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∫ italic_d italic_X italic_d italic_x ∫ italic_d italic_X italic_d italic_x roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_X , italic_x ) ( italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_P italic_p ) roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) ,
(10)
where we introduce an effective energy and an effective mass of the two-body systemTeo76 ; Teo78 ; Cra84 ; Cra87 ,
Report issue for preceding element
E w = 1 2 M ( M 2 − ( m 1 2 + m 2 2 ) ) , m w = m 1 m 2 M , formulae-sequence subscript 𝐸 𝑤 1 2 𝑀 superscript 𝑀 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 1 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 2 2 subscript 𝑚 𝑤 subscript 𝑚 1 subscript 𝑚 2 𝑀 \displaystyle E_{w}=\frac{1}{2M}(M^{2}-(m_{1}^{2}+m_{2}^{2})),~{}~{}~{}m_{w}=%
\frac{m_{1}m_{2}}{M}, italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_M end_ARG ( italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_M end_ARG ,
(11)
and the two-body field Φ ( X , x ) Φ 𝑋 𝑥 \Phi(X,x) roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x )
Report issue for preceding element
Φ ( X , x ) = Φ 1 ( X − x / 2 ) Φ 2 ( X + x / 2 ) . Φ 𝑋 𝑥 subscript Φ 1 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript Φ 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 \displaystyle\Phi(X,x)=\Phi_{1}(X-x/2)\Phi_{2}(X+x/2). roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) = roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) .
(12)
Varying with respect to the field Φ ∗ ( X , x ) superscript Φ ∗ 𝑋 𝑥 \Phi^{\ast}(X,x) roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_X , italic_x ) we obtain the motion equation
Report issue for preceding element
( E w 2 + p 2 − m w 2 − ( μ 1 − μ 2 ) P p ) Φ ( X , x ) = 0 . superscript subscript 𝐸 𝑤 2 superscript 𝑝 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 2 subscript 𝜇 1 subscript 𝜇 2 𝑃 𝑝 Φ 𝑋 𝑥 0 \displaystyle\bigg{(}{E}_{w}^{2}+p^{2}-{m}_{w}^{2}-\big{(}{{\mu_{1}}}-{{\mu_{2%
}}}\big{)}{P}{p}\bigg{)}\Phi(X,x)=0. ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_P italic_p ) roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) = 0 .
(13)
Let us take the Lagrange multiplier as follows
Report issue for preceding element
λ 1 = ( ∫ 𝑑 x Φ 2 ∗ ( x ) Φ 2 ( x ) ) , λ 2 = − ( ∫ 𝑑 x Φ 1 ∗ ( x ) Φ 1 ( x ) ) . formulae-sequence subscript 𝜆 1 differential-d 𝑥 subscript superscript Φ ∗ 2 𝑥 subscript Φ 2 𝑥 subscript 𝜆 2 differential-d 𝑥 subscript superscript Φ ∗ 1 𝑥 subscript Φ 1 𝑥 \displaystyle\lambda_{1}=\Big{(}\int dx\Phi^{\ast}_{2}(x)\Phi_{2}(x)\Big{)},%
\lambda_{2}=-\Big{(}\int dx\Phi^{\ast}_{1}(x)\Phi_{1}(x)\Big{)}. italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( ∫ italic_d italic_x roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) ) , italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - ( ∫ italic_d italic_x roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) ) .
Then, we get the action integral 𝔄 − subscript 𝔄 {\mathfrak{A}}_{-} fraktur_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Report issue for preceding element
𝔄 − = ∫ 𝑑 X 𝑑 x ∫ 𝑑 X 𝑑 x Φ ∗ ( X , x ) ( P p ) Φ ( X , x ) . subscript 𝔄 differential-d 𝑋 differential-d 𝑥 differential-d 𝑋 differential-d 𝑥 superscript Φ ∗ 𝑋 𝑥 𝑃 𝑝 Φ 𝑋 𝑥 \displaystyle{\mathfrak{A}}_{-}=\int dXdx\int dXdx\Phi^{\ast}(X,x)\big{(}Pp%
\big{)}\Phi(X,x). fraktur_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∫ italic_d italic_X italic_d italic_x ∫ italic_d italic_X italic_d italic_x roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_X , italic_x ) ( italic_P italic_p ) roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) .
(15)
Such an action integral generates the motion equation
Report issue for preceding element
( P p ) Φ ( X , x ) = 0 . 𝑃 𝑝 Φ 𝑋 𝑥 0 \displaystyle({P}{p})~{}\Phi(X,x)=0. ( italic_P italic_p ) roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) = 0 .
(16)
This motion equation corresponds to the relativistic version of the third Newton’s lawCra84 ; Cra87 and is in entire relation to Eq.(19)Cra87 . Such a results is physically understandable since the Lagrange multipliers selection dictated by Eq.(2.1 ) keeps the particle interaction only, eliminating their kinematics.
Report issue for preceding element
Provided that Eq.(16 ) the motion equation takes a form
Report issue for preceding element
( E w 2 + p 2 − m w 2 ) Φ ( X , x ) = 0 . superscript subscript 𝐸 𝑤 2 superscript 𝑝 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 2 Φ 𝑋 𝑥 0 \displaystyle\bigg{(}{E}_{w}^{2}+p^{2}-{m}_{w}^{2}\bigg{)}\Phi(X,x)=0. ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) = 0 .
(17)
This equation is covariant in ℜ 1 3 ( X ) ⊗ ℜ 1 3 ( x ) tensor-product subscript superscript ℜ 3 1 𝑋 subscript superscript ℜ 3 1 𝑥 {\mathfrak{R}}^{3}_{1}(X)\otimes{\mathfrak{R}}^{3}_{1}(x) fraktur_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X ) ⊗ fraktur_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) space corresponding to the both center-mass and relative motion. Such types of motion can be obviously decoupled looking for the solution of Eq.(17 ) as
Report issue for preceding element
Φ ( X , x ) = χ ( X ) φ ( x ) , Φ 𝑋 𝑥 𝜒 𝑋 𝜑 𝑥 \displaystyle\Phi(X,x)=\chi(X)\varphi(x), roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) = italic_χ ( italic_X ) italic_φ ( italic_x ) ,
(18)
where χ ( X ) 𝜒 𝑋 \chi(X) italic_χ ( italic_X ) is the eigenfuncion of an equation
Report issue for preceding element
E w 2 χ ( X ) = E w 2 ( P ) χ ( X ) . superscript subscript 𝐸 𝑤 2 𝜒 𝑋 superscript subscript 𝐸 𝑤 2 𝑃 𝜒 𝑋 \displaystyle{E}_{w}^{2}\chi(X)={E}_{w}^{2}(P)\chi(X). italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_χ ( italic_X ) = italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_P ) italic_χ ( italic_X ) .
(19)
As a result, we go to the Eq.(20 ) for the function ϕ ( x ) italic-ϕ 𝑥 \phi(x) italic_ϕ ( italic_x ) where E w 2 ( P ) superscript subscript 𝐸 𝑤 2 𝑃 {E}_{w}^{2}(P) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_P ) has already been a C 𝐶 C italic_C -function.
Report issue for preceding element
( E w 2 ( P ) + p 2 − m w 2 ) φ ( x ) = 0 . superscript subscript 𝐸 𝑤 2 𝑃 superscript 𝑝 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 2 𝜑 𝑥 0 \displaystyle\bigg{(}{E}_{w}^{2}(P)+p^{2}-{m}_{w}^{2}\bigg{)}\varphi(x)=0. ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_P ) + italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_φ ( italic_x ) = 0 .
(20)
Although this equation is covariant in the ℜ 1 3 ( x ) subscript superscript ℜ 3 1 𝑥 {\mathfrak{R}}^{3}_{1}(x) fraktur_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) but it cannot be reduced to the standard Klein-Gordon equation.
Report issue for preceding element
We look for the solution of Eq.(20 ) as follows
Report issue for preceding element
φ ( x ) = φ ( 𝒙 ) exp ( − i τ p 0 ) . 𝜑 𝑥 𝜑 𝒙 𝑖 𝜏 superscript 𝑝 0 \displaystyle\varphi(x)=\varphi(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})\exp(-i\tau p^{0}). italic_φ ( italic_x ) = italic_φ ( bold_italic_x ) roman_exp ( - italic_i italic_τ italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) .
(21)
We breaking the ℜ 1 3 ( x ) subscript superscript ℜ 3 1 𝑥 {\mathfrak{R}}^{3}_{1}(x) fraktur_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) covariance in favor of keeping the Klein-Gordon form of the motion equation, that turns out to be reasonable under studying two interaction particles, and introduce ε w subscript 𝜀 𝑤 \varepsilon_{w} italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and θ w subscript 𝜃 𝑤 \theta_{w} italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Report issue for preceding element
E w ( P ) = ε w cos θ w subscript 𝐸 𝑤 𝑃 subscript 𝜀 𝑤 subscript 𝜃 𝑤 \displaystyle{E}_{w}(P)=\varepsilon_{w}\cos\theta_{w} italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_P ) = italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_cos italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
(22a)
p 0 = ε w sin θ w . superscript 𝑝 0 subscript 𝜀 𝑤 subscript 𝜃 𝑤 \displaystyle p^{0}=\varepsilon_{w}\sin\theta_{w}. italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sin italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
(22b)
As a result, we get
Report issue for preceding element
( ε w 2 + 𝒑 2 − m w 2 ) φ ( 𝒙 ) = 0 , superscript subscript 𝜀 𝑤 2 superscript 𝒑 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 2 𝜑 𝒙 0 \displaystyle\bigg{(}{\varepsilon}_{w}^{2}+\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}^{2}-{m}_{w}^{%
2}\bigg{)}\varphi(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})=0, ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + bold_italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_φ ( bold_italic_x ) = 0 ,
(23)
the obtained equation is the Klein-Gordon equation which is covariant in the ℜ 1 3 ( ε w , 𝒙 ) subscript superscript ℜ 3 1 subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 {\mathfrak{R}}^{3}_{1}(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}) fraktur_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) phase spaceTeo71 ; Teo76 ; Droz ; Kal ; Teo78 ; Kom ; Are ; Kir ; Dom78 ; Dom80 ; Sad86-1 ; Sad86-2 ; Sad94 ; Sad89 ; Cra84 ; Cra87 ; Cra90 ; Cra01 ; Cra03 ; Cra06 ; Cra10 rather than the standard coordinate ℜ 1 3 ( x ) subscript superscript ℜ 3 1 𝑥 {\mathfrak{R}}^{3}_{1}(x) fraktur_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) space-time.
Report issue for preceding element
2.2 Interacting particles Report issue for preceding element
In the case of interacting particles we construct the action integrals 𝔄 + subscript 𝔄 {\mathfrak{A}}_{+} fraktur_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and 𝔄 − subscript 𝔄 {\mathfrak{A}}_{-} fraktur_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT by taking the Lagrange multipliers λ 1 , 2 subscript 𝜆 1 2
\lambda_{1,2} italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT according to Eqs.(2.1 ), (2.1 ) as it has been done above for the free particles. Such action integrals generate the motion equations after going to the center mass and relative motion variables (see Eq.(7 )).
Report issue for preceding element
{ 2 ( p 2 + E w 2 − m w 2 − ( μ 1 − μ 2 ) P p ) + 𝒜 1 2 ( X − x / 2 ) + 2 𝒜 1 ( X − x / 2 ) ( μ 2 P − p ) + \displaystyle\bigg{\{}2(p^{2}+E_{w}^{2}-m_{w}^{2}-(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})Pp)+{\cal A%
}_{1}^{2}(X-x/2)+2{\cal A}_{1}(X-x/2)(\mu_{2}P-p)+ { 2 ( italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_P italic_p ) + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) + 2 caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P - italic_p ) +
[ ( μ 2 P − p ) ; 𝒜 1 ( X − x / 2 ) ] + 𝒜 2 2 ( X + x / 2 ) + 2 𝒜 2 ( X + x / 2 ) ( μ 1 P + p ) + subscript 𝜇 2 𝑃 𝑝 subscript 𝒜 1 𝑋 𝑥 2
superscript subscript 𝒜 2 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 limit-from 2 subscript 𝒜 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript 𝜇 1 𝑃 𝑝 \displaystyle[(\mu_{2}P-p);{\cal A}_{1}(X-x/2)]+{\cal A}_{2}^{2}(X+x/2)+2{\cal
A%
}_{2}(X+x/2)(\mu_{1}P+p)+ [ ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P - italic_p ) ; caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) ] + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) + 2 caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P + italic_p ) +
[ ( μ 1 P + p ) ; 𝒜 2 ( X + x / 2 ) ] − 2 m 1 𝒮 1 ( X − x / 2 ) − 𝒮 1 2 ( X − x / 2 ) + subscript 𝜇 1 𝑃 𝑝 subscript 𝒜 2 𝑋 𝑥 2
2 subscript 𝑚 1 subscript 𝒮 1 𝑋 𝑥 2 limit-from subscript superscript 𝒮 2 1 𝑋 𝑥 2 \displaystyle\ [(\mu_{1}P+p);{\cal A}_{2}(X+x/2)]-2m_{1}{\cal S}_{1}(X-x/2)-{%
\cal S}^{2}_{1}(X-x/2)+ [ ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P + italic_p ) ; caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) ] - 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) - caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) +
− 2 m 2 𝒮 2 ( X + x / 2 ) − 𝒮 2 2 ( X + x / 2 ) } Φ ( X , x ) = 0 , \displaystyle-2m_{2}{\cal S}_{2}(X+x/2)-{\cal S}^{2}_{2}(X+x/2)\bigg{\}}\Phi(X%
,x)=0, - 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) - caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) } roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) = 0 ,
(24)
− 2 P p Φ ( X , x ) = { 𝒜 1 2 ( X − x / 2 ) + 2 𝒜 1 ( X − x / 2 ) ( μ 2 P − p ) + [ ( μ 2 P − p ) ; 𝒜 1 ( X − x / 2 ) ] − \displaystyle-2Pp~{}\Phi(X,x)=\bigg{\{}{\cal A}_{1}^{2}(X-x/2)+2{\cal A}_{1}(X%
-x/2)(\mu_{2}P-p)+[(\mu_{2}P-p);{\cal A}_{1}(X-x/2)]- - 2 italic_P italic_p roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) = { caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) + 2 caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P - italic_p ) + [ ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P - italic_p ) ; caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) ] -
𝒜 2 2 ( X + x / 2 ) − 2 𝒜 2 ( X + x / 2 ) ( μ 1 P + p ) + [ ( μ 1 P + p ) ; 𝒜 2 ( X + x / 2 ) ] − superscript subscript 𝒜 2 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 2 subscript 𝒜 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript 𝜇 1 𝑃 𝑝 limit-from subscript 𝜇 1 𝑃 𝑝 subscript 𝒜 2 𝑋 𝑥 2
\displaystyle{\cal A}_{2}^{2}(X+x/2)-2{\cal A}_{2}(X+x/2)(\mu_{1}P+p)+[(\mu_{1%
}P+p);{\cal A}_{2}(X+x/2)]- caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) - 2 caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P + italic_p ) + [ ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P + italic_p ) ; caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) ] -
2 m 1 𝒮 1 ( X − x / 2 ) − 𝒮 1 2 ( X − x / 2 ) − 2 m 2 𝒮 2 ( X + x / 2 ) − 𝒮 2 2 ( X + x / 2 ) } Φ ( X , x ) , \displaystyle 2m_{1}{\cal S}_{1}(X-x/2)-{\cal S}^{2}_{1}(X-x/2)-2m_{2}{\cal S}%
_{2}(X+x/2)-{\cal S}^{2}_{2}(X+x/2)\bigg{\}}\Phi(X,x), 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) - caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) - 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) - caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) } roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) ,
(25)
where the square brackets denote, as usual, a commutator.
Report issue for preceding element
Obtained above Eq.(2.2 ) governs breaking the 3-rd Newton law which naturally takes place when there is no restriction to interaction potentials.
Report issue for preceding element
Substitution Eq.(2.2 ) into Eq.(2.2 ) leads to
Report issue for preceding element
{ ( E w 2 + p 2 − m w 2 ) + 𝒜 1 2 ( X − x / 2 ) μ 1 + 2 𝒜 1 ( X − x / 2 ) ( μ 2 P − p ) μ 1 + \displaystyle\bigg{\{}(E_{w}^{2}+p^{2}-m_{w}^{2})+{\cal A}_{1}^{2}(X-x/2)\mu_{%
1}+2{\cal A}_{1}(X-x/2)(\mu_{2}P-p)\mu_{1}+ { ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P - italic_p ) italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT +
[ ( μ 2 P − p ) ; 𝒜 1 ( X − x / 2 ) ] μ 1 + 𝒜 2 2 ( X + x / 2 ) μ 2 + 2 𝒜 2 ( X + x / 2 ) ( μ 1 P + p ) μ 2 + subscript 𝜇 2 𝑃 𝑝 subscript 𝒜 1 𝑋 𝑥 2
subscript 𝜇 1 superscript subscript 𝒜 2 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript 𝜇 2 limit-from 2 subscript 𝒜 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript 𝜇 1 𝑃 𝑝 subscript 𝜇 2 \displaystyle[(\mu_{2}P-p);{\cal A}_{1}(X-x/2)]\mu_{1}+{\cal A}_{2}^{2}(X+x/2)%
\mu_{2}+2{\cal A}_{2}(X+x/2)(\mu_{1}P+p)\mu_{2}+ [ ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P - italic_p ) ; caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) ] italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P + italic_p ) italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT +
[ ( μ 1 P + p ) ; 𝒜 2 ( X + x / 2 ) ] μ 2 − 2 m 1 𝒮 1 ( X − x / 2 ) μ 1 − 𝒮 1 2 ( X − x / 2 ) μ 1 + subscript 𝜇 1 𝑃 𝑝 subscript 𝒜 2 𝑋 𝑥 2
subscript 𝜇 2 2 subscript 𝑚 1 subscript 𝒮 1 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript 𝜇 1 limit-from subscript superscript 𝒮 2 1 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript 𝜇 1 \displaystyle[(\mu_{1}P+p);{\cal A}_{2}(X+x/2)]\mu_{2}-2m_{1}{\cal S}_{1}(X-x/%
2)\mu_{1}-{\cal S}^{2}_{1}(X-x/2)\mu_{1}+ [ ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P + italic_p ) ; caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) ] italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT +
− 2 m 2 𝒮 2 ( X + x / 2 ) μ 2 − 𝒮 2 2 ( X + x / 2 ) μ 2 } Φ ( X , x ) = 0 . \displaystyle-2m_{2}{\cal S}_{2}(X+x/2)\mu_{2}-{\cal S}^{2}_{2}(X+x/2)\mu_{2}%
\bigg{\}}\Phi(X,x)=0. - 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } roman_Φ ( italic_X , italic_x ) = 0 .
(26)
Note, that Eq.(2.2 ) can be also derived by summing and subtracting the motion equation for each of the particles consisting of the two-body system.
Report issue for preceding element
2.3 The two-body problem in the absence of external fields Report issue for preceding element
The center-mass and relative motion variables turn out to be uncoupled in Eq.(2.2 ) due external potentials since these potentials depend on the coordinate each a particle independently (see Eqs.(4 ), (4 )). We firstly consider the situation when there is no external potentials acting on the two-body system. We also assume that the potentials 𝒜 i μ = ( 𝒜 1 0 , 𝑨 i ) = 𝒜 i μ ( 𝒙 ) subscript superscript 𝒜 𝜇 𝑖 subscript superscript 𝒜 0 1 subscript 𝑨 𝑖 subscript superscript 𝒜 𝜇 𝑖 𝒙 {\cal A}^{\mu}_{i}=({\cal A}^{0}_{1},\hbox{\boldmath${\cal\hbox{\boldmath${A}$%
}}$}_{i})={\cal A}^{\mu}_{i}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}) caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) and 𝒮 i = 𝒮 i ( 𝒙 ) subscript 𝒮 𝑖 subscript 𝒮 𝑖 𝒙 {\cal S}_{i}={\cal S}_{i}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}) caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) , where i = 1 , 2 𝑖 1 2
i=1,2 italic_i = 1 , 2 numerates particles, depend only on the spatial relative coordinate 𝒙 𝒙 {x} bold_italic_x . Moreover, let the following symmetry relation be
Report issue for preceding element
𝑨 1 μ ( 𝒙 ) = 𝑨 2 μ ( 𝒙 ) ≡ 𝑨 μ ( 𝒙 ) , subscript superscript 𝑨 𝜇 1 𝒙 subscript superscript 𝑨 𝜇 2 𝒙 superscript 𝑨 𝜇 𝒙 \displaystyle{\cal\hbox{\boldmath${A}$}}^{\mu}_{1}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})={%
\cal\hbox{\boldmath${A}$}}^{\mu}_{2}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})\equiv{\cal\hbox{%
\boldmath${A}$}}^{\mu}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}), bold_italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) = bold_italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ≡ bold_italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ,
(27a)
𝒜 i 0 ( 𝒙 ) = 𝒜 i 0 ( − 𝒙 ) , 𝑨 ( 𝒙 ) = − 𝑨 ( − 𝒙 ) formulae-sequence subscript superscript 𝒜 0 𝑖 𝒙 subscript superscript 𝒜 0 𝑖 𝒙 𝑨 𝒙 𝑨 𝒙 \displaystyle{\cal A}^{0}_{i}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})={\cal A}^{0}_{i}(-\hbox{%
\boldmath${x}$}),~{}~{}~{}{\cal\hbox{\boldmath${A}$}}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})=-%
{\cal\hbox{\boldmath${A}$}}(-\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}) caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) = caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( - bold_italic_x ) , bold_italic_A ( bold_italic_x ) = - bold_italic_A ( - bold_italic_x )
(27b)
𝒮 i ( 𝒙 ) = 𝒮 i ( − 𝒙 ) . subscript 𝒮 𝑖 𝒙 subscript 𝒮 𝑖 𝒙 \displaystyle{\cal S}_{i}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})={\cal S}_{i}(-\hbox{\boldmath%
${x}$}). caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) = caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( - bold_italic_x ) .
(27c)
Then, we separate the center-mass and relative motion variables, following Eqs.(18 ), (19 ). As a result, in terms of ε w subscript 𝜀 𝑤 \varepsilon_{w} italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and θ w subscript 𝜃 𝑤 \theta_{w} italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT given by Eq.(22 ) we obtain from Eq.(2.2 )
Report issue for preceding element
{ ( ε w 2 + ( 𝒑 + 𝑨 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − m w 2 ) + μ 1 ( 𝒜 1 0 ) 2 ( 𝒙 ) + μ 2 ( 𝒜 2 0 ) 2 ( 𝒙 ) + 2 μ 1 μ 2 P 0 ( 𝒜 1 0 ( 𝒙 ) + 𝒜 2 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) \displaystyle\bigg{\{}(\varepsilon_{w}^{2}+(\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}+{\cal\hbox{%
\boldmath${A}$}}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}-m_{w}^{2})+\mu_{1}({\cal A}^{0}_{%
1})^{2}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})+\mu_{2}({\cal A}^{0}_{2})^{2}(\hbox{\boldmath${%
x}$})+2\mu_{1}\mu_{2}P^{0}({\cal A}^{0}_{1}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})+{\cal A}^{0%
}_{2}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})) { ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( bold_italic_p + bold_italic_A ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) + 2 italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) )
+ 2 p 0 ( μ 2 𝒜 2 0 ( 𝒙 ) − μ 1 𝒜 1 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) − μ 1 𝒮 1 2 − − μ 2 𝒮 2 2 ( 𝒙 ) − 2 ( m 1 μ 1 𝒮 1 ( 𝒙 ) + m 2 μ 2 𝒮 2 ( 𝒙 ) ) } φ ( 𝒙 ) = 0 . \displaystyle+2p^{0}(\mu_{2}{\cal A}^{0}_{2}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})-\mu_{1}{%
\cal A}^{0}_{1}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))-\mu_{1}{\cal S}^{2}_{1}--\mu_{2}{\cal S%
}^{2}_{2}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})-2(m_{1}\mu_{1}{\cal S}_{1}(\hbox{\boldmath${x%
}$})+m_{2}\mu_{2}{\cal S}_{2}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))\bigg{\}}\varphi(\hbox{%
\boldmath${x}$})=0. + 2 italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) - italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) - italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - - italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) - 2 ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) } italic_φ ( bold_italic_x ) = 0 .
We write the potentials 𝒜 i 0 ( 𝒙 ) subscript superscript 𝒜 0 𝑖 𝒙 {\cal A}^{0}_{i}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}) caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) and 𝒮 1 ( 𝒙 ) subscript 𝒮 1 𝒙 {\cal S}_{1}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}) caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) as follows
Report issue for preceding element
𝒜 1 0 ( 𝒙 ) = 1 μ 1 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) cos θ A , 𝒜 2 0 ( 𝒙 ) = 1 μ 2 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) sin θ A , formulae-sequence subscript superscript 𝒜 0 1 𝒙 1 subscript 𝜇 1 superscript 𝒜 0 𝒙 subscript 𝜃 𝐴 subscript superscript 𝒜 0 2 𝒙 1 subscript 𝜇 2 superscript 𝒜 0 𝒙 subscript 𝜃 𝐴 \displaystyle{\cal A}^{0}_{1}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu}_{1}}{%
\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})\cos\theta_{A},~{}~{}{\cal A}^{0}_{2}(\hbox{%
\boldmath${x}$})=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu}_{2}}{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})%
\sin\theta_{A}, caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) roman_cos italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) roman_sin italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,
(29a)
𝒮 1 ( 𝒙 ) = 1 μ 1 𝒮 0 ( 𝒙 ) cos θ S , 𝒮 2 ( 𝒙 ) = 1 μ 2 𝒮 0 ( 𝒙 ) sin θ S . formulae-sequence subscript 𝒮 1 𝒙 1 subscript 𝜇 1 superscript 𝒮 0 𝒙 subscript 𝜃 𝑆 subscript 𝒮 2 𝒙 1 subscript 𝜇 2 superscript 𝒮 0 𝒙 subscript 𝜃 𝑆 \displaystyle{\cal S}_{1}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu}_{1}}{\cal
S%
}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})\cos\theta_{S},~{}~{}{\cal S}_{2}(\hbox{\boldmath$%
{x}$})=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu}_{2}}{\cal S}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})\sin\theta_{%
S}. caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) roman_cos italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) roman_sin italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
(29b)
Substituting Eq.(29 ) into Eq.(2.3 ) we derive
Report issue for preceding element
{ ε w 2 + ( 𝒑 + 𝑨 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − m w 2 + ( 𝒜 0 ) 2 ( 𝒙 ) + 2 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) P 0 cos ( θ A − ψ A ) − 2 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) p 0 cos ( θ A + ψ A ) \displaystyle\bigg{\{}\varepsilon_{w}^{2}+(\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}+{\cal\hbox{%
\boldmath${A}$}}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}-m_{w}^{2}+({\cal A}^{0})^{2}(%
\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})+2{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})P^{0}\cos(\theta_{A%
}-\psi_{A})-2{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})p^{0}\cos(\theta_{A}+\psi_{A}) { italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( bold_italic_p + bold_italic_A ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) + 2 caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) italic_P start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_cos ( italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - 2 caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_cos ( italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
− 𝒮 2 ( 𝒙 ) − 2 𝒮 ( 𝒙 ) ( m 1 μ 1 cos θ S + m 2 μ 2 sin θ S ) } φ ( 𝒙 ) = 0 , \displaystyle-{\cal S}^{2}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})-2{\cal S}(\hbox{\boldmath${x%
}$})(m_{1}\sqrt{\mu}_{1}\cos\theta_{S}+m_{2}\sqrt{\mu}_{2}\sin\theta_{S})\bigg%
{\}}\varphi(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})=0, - caligraphic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) - 2 caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_x ) ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_cos italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sin italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) } italic_φ ( bold_italic_x ) = 0 ,
(30)
where tan ψ A = μ 2 / μ 1 subscript 𝜓 𝐴 subscript 𝜇 2 subscript 𝜇 1 \tan\psi_{A}=\sqrt{\mu_{2}/\mu_{1}} roman_tan italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG .
Report issue for preceding element
We take θ A subscript 𝜃 𝐴 \theta_{A} italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and θ S subscript 𝜃 𝑆 \theta_{S} italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT so that the following equations takes place
Report issue for preceding element
P 0 cos ( θ A − ψ A ) − p 0 cos ( θ A + ψ A ) = ε w superscript 𝑃 0 subscript 𝜃 𝐴 subscript 𝜓 𝐴 superscript 𝑝 0 subscript 𝜃 𝐴 subscript 𝜓 𝐴 subscript 𝜀 𝑤 \displaystyle P^{0}\cos(\theta_{A}-\psi_{A})-p^{0}\cos(\theta_{A}+\psi_{A})=%
\varepsilon_{w} italic_P start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_cos ( italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_cos ( italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
(31)
m 1 μ 1 cos θ S + m 2 μ 2 sin θ S = m w . subscript 𝑚 1 subscript 𝜇 1 subscript 𝜃 𝑆 subscript 𝑚 2 subscript 𝜇 2 subscript 𝜃 𝑆 subscript 𝑚 𝑤 \displaystyle m_{1}\sqrt{\mu}_{1}\cos\theta_{S}+m_{2}\sqrt{\mu}_{2}\sin\theta_%
{S}=m_{w}. italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_cos italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sin italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
(32)
Then, the motion equation takes a form
Report issue for preceding element
{ ( ε w + 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 + ( 𝒑 + 𝑨 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − ( m w + 𝒮 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 } φ ( 𝒙 ) = 0 . superscript subscript 𝜀 𝑤 superscript 𝒜 0 𝒙 2 superscript 𝒑 𝑨 𝒙 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 𝒮 𝒙 2 𝜑 𝒙 0 \displaystyle\bigg{\{}(\varepsilon_{w}+{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2%
}+(\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}+{\cal\hbox{\boldmath${A}$}}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{%
2}-(m_{w}+{\cal S}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}\bigg{\}}\varphi(\hbox{\boldmath%
${x}$})=0. { ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( bold_italic_p + bold_italic_A ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } italic_φ ( bold_italic_x ) = 0 .
(33)
If the solution of Eq.(33 ) is known the general solution of the problem can be written using Eqs.(19 ), (21 ), provided that Eq.(27 ) also takes place.
Report issue for preceding element
In the Breit frame, when 𝒑 1 + 𝒑 2 = 0 subscript 𝒑 1 subscript 𝒑 2 0 \hbox{\boldmath${p}$}_{1}+\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}_{2}=0 bold_italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 the obtained equation Eq.(33 ) coincides with the motion equations have derived earlierCra84 ; Cra87 .
Report issue for preceding element
2.4 The two-body problem in external fields Report issue for preceding element
We consider the open two-body problem when the two-particle interaction system is also in external fields. The possibility to factorize the center-mass and relative motion variables, as it has been done above in the absence of external potentials, is entirely determined on the structure of the first terms in Eq.(4 ), (4b ).
Report issue for preceding element
In order to the center-mass and relative motion variables could be separated the sums of external potentials A 1 ν ( X − x / 2 ) + A 2 ν ( X + x / 2 ) subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜈 1 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜈 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 {A}^{\nu}_{1}(X-x/2)+{A}^{\nu}_{2}(X+x/2) italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) + italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) and S 1 ( X − x / 2 ) + S 2 ( X + x / 2 ) subscript 𝑆 1 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript 𝑆 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 {S}_{1}(X-x/2)+{S}_{2}(X+x/2) italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) + italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) should depend only on either X 𝑋 X italic_X or x 𝑥 x italic_x . Since such a demand is impossible for the scalar field we exclude the external scalar field from our consideration below , setting S 1 ( X − x / 2 ) = S 2 ( X + x / 2 ) = 0 subscript 𝑆 1 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript 𝑆 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 0 {S}_{1}(X-x/2)={S}_{2}(X+x/2)=0 italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) = italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) = 0 . As for the external vector fields the center-mass and relative motion variables are decoupled when the vector potentials are a linear function of coordinates
Report issue for preceding element
A 1 ν ( X − x / 2 ) + A 2 ν ( X + x / 2 ) = e ν μ α β F μ α ( x 1 ± x 2 ) β , subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜈 1 𝑋 𝑥 2 subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜈 2 𝑋 𝑥 2 superscript 𝑒 𝜈 𝜇 𝛼 𝛽 subscript 𝐹 𝜇 𝛼 subscript plus-or-minus subscript 𝑥 1 subscript 𝑥 2 𝛽 \displaystyle{A}^{\nu}_{1}(X-x/2)+{A}^{\nu}_{2}(X+x/2)=e^{\nu\mu\alpha\beta}F_%
{\mu\alpha}(x_{1}\pm x_{2})_{\beta}, italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X - italic_x / 2 ) + italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X + italic_x / 2 ) = italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν italic_μ italic_α italic_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,
(34)
where F μ α subscript 𝐹 𝜇 𝛼 F_{\mu\alpha} italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is some 4-tensor being independent on coordinates. When the plus sign occurs the external potential affects the center mass motion, while in the opposite case the external fields influence on the relative motion.
Report issue for preceding element
We note that the demand given by Eq.(34 ) takes place particularly provided that F μ α subscript 𝐹 𝜇 𝛼 F_{\mu\alpha} italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the tensor of homogeneous electromagnetic fields.
Report issue for preceding element
3 Two spin-1 2 1 2 \frac{1}{2} divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG particles in external fields Report issue for preceding element
We consider spin-1 2 1 2 \frac{1}{2} divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG particles with masses m 1 subscript 𝑚 1 m_{1} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and m 2 subscript 𝑚 2 m_{2} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT which interact each other by means of vector and scalar fields , which are A i n t ν ( x ) superscript subscript 𝐴 𝑖 𝑛 𝑡 𝜈 𝑥 A_{int}^{\nu}(x) italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_n italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x ) and S i n t ( x ) subscript 𝑆 𝑖 𝑛 𝑡 𝑥 S_{int}(x) italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_n italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) , respectively. These particles also are in the external vector A e x t ν ( x ) superscript subscript 𝐴 𝑒 𝑥 𝑡 𝜈 𝑥 A_{ext}^{\nu}(x) italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_x italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x ) . Such a two-body system is described by the 16-component spinor which each component φ i ( ε w , 𝒓 ) subscript 𝜑 𝑖 subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒓 \varphi_{i}(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${r}$}) italic_φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r ) is governed by the Klein-Gordon equation (2.2 ). Provided that the interaction and external potentials satisfy Eqs.(27 ) (34 ), respectively, these equation is simlified, and φ i ( ε w , 𝒓 ) subscript 𝜑 𝑖 subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒓 \varphi_{i}(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${r}$}) italic_φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r ) are governed by Eq.(33 )
Report issue for preceding element
{ ( ε w + 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 + ( 𝒑 + 𝑨 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − ( m w + 𝒮 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 } φ i ( ε w , 𝒙 ) = 0 . superscript subscript 𝜀 𝑤 superscript 𝒜 0 𝒙 2 superscript 𝒑 𝑨 𝒙 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 𝒮 𝒙 2 subscript 𝜑 𝑖 subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 0 \displaystyle\bigg{\{}(\varepsilon_{w}+{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2%
}+(\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}+{\cal\hbox{\boldmath${A}$}}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{%
2}-(m_{w}+{\cal S}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}\bigg{\}}\varphi_{i}(\varepsilon%
_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})=0. { ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( bold_italic_p + bold_italic_A ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } italic_φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) = 0 .
(35)
Following the standard way we rewrite this equation in a form
Report issue for preceding element
p ^ ν g ν μ p ^ μ φ i ( 𝒙 ) = 0 , subscript ^ 𝑝 𝜈 superscript 𝑔 𝜈 𝜇 subscript ^ 𝑝 𝜇 subscript 𝜑 𝑖 𝒙 0 \displaystyle{\hat{p}}_{\nu}g^{\nu\mu}{\hat{p}}_{\mu}\varphi_{i}(\hbox{%
\boldmath${x}$})=0, over^ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) = 0 ,
(36)
where we introduce p ^ ν = ( ( ε w + 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − ( m w + 𝒮 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 , − ( 𝒑 + 𝑨 ( 𝒙 ) ) ) subscript ^ 𝑝 𝜈 superscript subscript 𝜀 𝑤 superscript 𝒜 0 𝒙 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 𝒮 𝒙 2 𝒑 𝑨 𝒙 {\hat{p}}_{\nu}=\Big{(}\sqrt{(\varepsilon_{w}+{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}%
$}))^{2}-(m_{w}+{\cal S}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}},-({{\hbox{\boldmath${p}$%
}}}+{\cal\hbox{\boldmath${A}$}}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))\Big{)} over^ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( square-root start_ARG ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , - ( bold_italic_p + bold_italic_A ( bold_italic_x ) ) ) ; and the metric tensor g ν μ superscript 𝑔 𝜈 𝜇 g^{\nu\mu} italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT which non-equal to zeroth diagonal componenets are diag = ( 1 , − 1 . − 1 . − 1 ) {\rm diag}=(1,-1.-1.-1) roman_diag = ( 1 , - 1 . - 1 . - 1 ) .
Report issue for preceding element
To obtain the motion equation in the Dirac-like form we express the metric tensor in terms of the γ 𝛾 \gamma italic_γ -matrices of the ( 16 × 16 ) 16 16 (16\times 16) ( 16 × 16 ) dimension.
The relations (7 ) which introduce new variables imply going to a new basis in the γ 𝛾 \gamma italic_γ -matrix space so that the new and old γ 𝛾 \gamma italic_γ -matrices are related to each other by means of equations
Report issue for preceding element
Γ ^ = μ 1 γ ( 1 ) ⊗ I ( 2 ) + μ 2 γ ( 2 ) ⊗ I ( 1 ) , \displaystyle{\hat{\Gamma}}=\mu_{1}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma}}%
\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}}+\mu_{2}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{%
\gamma}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}}, over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ,
γ ^ = γ ( 2 ) ⊗ I ( 1 ) − γ ( 1 ) ⊗ I ( 2 ) \displaystyle{\hat{\gamma}}=\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{{\gamma}}}\otimes%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}}-\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma}}%
\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}} over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG = start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP - start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP
(37)
where the hatted γ ^ ^ 𝛾 \hat{\gamma} over^ start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG -matrices form a new basis, the numbers in brackets which are over a symbol means that this matrix acts on the variables of the corresponding particle, I ( 1 , 2 ) superscript 𝐼 1 2 \stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1,2)}}{{I}} start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 , 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP is the unit matrix in the space of the first or second particle, respectively.
These matrices satisfy the following transformation relations (see Appendix B)
Report issue for preceding element
Γ ^ 0 Γ ^ 0 + Γ ^ 0 Γ ^ 0 = 2 I ( 1 + 2 ) ; superscript ^ Γ 0 superscript ^ Γ 0 superscript ^ Γ 0 superscript ^ Γ 0 2 superscript 𝐼 1 2 absent \displaystyle{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}+{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}{\hat{%
\Gamma}}^{0}=2\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}}; over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2 start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ;
(38)
Γ ^ 0 γ a ^ + γ a ^ Γ ^ 0 = 0 , a = 1 , 2 , 3 ; formulae-sequence superscript ^ Γ 0 ^ superscript 𝛾 𝑎 ^ superscript 𝛾 𝑎 superscript ^ Γ 0 0 𝑎 1 2 3
\displaystyle{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}{\hat{\gamma^{a}}}+{\hat{\gamma^{a}}}{\hat{%
\Gamma}}^{0}=0,~{}~{}a=1,2,3; over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + over^ start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0 , italic_a = 1 , 2 , 3 ;
(39)
γ a ^ γ b ^ + γ b ^ γ a ^ = − 4 δ a b I ( 1 + 2 ) + ^ superscript 𝛾 𝑎 ^ superscript 𝛾 𝑏 ^ superscript 𝛾 𝑏 ^ superscript 𝛾 𝑎 4 superscript 𝛿 𝑎 𝑏 superscript 𝐼 1 2 \displaystyle{\hat{\gamma^{a}}}{\hat{\gamma^{b}}}+{\hat{\gamma^{b}}}{\hat{%
\gamma^{a}}}=-4\delta^{ab}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}}+ over^ start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + over^ start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = - 4 italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP +
( σ 1 a σ 2 b + σ 2 b σ 1 a + σ 2 a σ 1 b + σ 1 b σ 2 a ) I ( 1 + 2 ) , superscript 𝐼 1 2 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑎 absent \displaystyle(\sigma_{1}^{a}\sigma_{2}^{b}+\sigma_{2}^{b}\sigma_{1}^{a}+\sigma%
_{2}^{a}\sigma_{1}^{b}+\sigma_{1}^{b}\sigma_{2}^{a})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+%
2)}}{{I}}, ( italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ,
(40)
where 𝒔 1 subscript 𝒔 1 \hbox{\boldmath${s}$}_{1} bold_italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and 𝒔 2 subscript 𝒔 2 \hbox{\boldmath${s}$}_{2} bold_italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denote particle spins, δ a b superscript 𝛿 𝑎 𝑏 \delta^{ab} italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the Kronecker symbol, I ( 1 + 2 ) superscript 𝐼 1 2 \stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}} start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP is the 16 × 16 16 16 16\times 16 16 × 16 unit matrix. Such transformation relations allow us to write down the metric tensor in terms of new γ 𝛾 \gamma italic_γ - matrices as follows
Report issue for preceding element
Γ ν Γ μ + Γ ν Γ μ = 2 g ν μ + superscript Γ 𝜈 superscript Γ 𝜇 superscript Γ 𝜈 superscript Γ 𝜇 limit-from 2 superscript 𝑔 𝜈 𝜇 \displaystyle\Gamma^{\nu}\Gamma^{\mu}+\Gamma^{\nu}\Gamma^{\mu}=2g^{\nu\mu}+ roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2 italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT +
(42)
( σ 1 a σ 2 b + σ 2 b σ 1 a + σ 2 a σ 1 b + σ 1 b σ 2 a + 4 δ a b ) I ( 1 + 2 ) / 2 , superscript 𝐼 1 2 2 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑎 4 superscript 𝛿 𝑎 𝑏 absent \displaystyle(\sigma_{1}^{a}\sigma_{2}^{b}+\sigma_{2}^{b}\sigma_{1}^{a}+\sigma%
_{2}^{a}\sigma_{1}^{b}+\sigma_{1}^{b}\sigma_{2}^{a}+4\delta^{ab})\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1+2)/2}}{{I}}, ( italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 4 italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) / 2 end_ARG end_RELOP ,
Γ ν = ( Γ ^ 0 , γ a ^ 2 ) ≡ ( Γ 0 , 𝚪 ) superscript Γ 𝜈 superscript ^ Γ 0 ^ superscript 𝛾 𝑎 2 superscript Γ 0 𝚪 \displaystyle\Gamma^{\nu}=\Big{(}{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0},\frac{{\hat{\gamma^{a}}}}{%
2}\Big{)}\equiv({\Gamma}^{0},{{\hbox{\boldmath${\Gamma}$}}}) roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , divide start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) ≡ ( roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , bold_Γ )
Taking g ν μ superscript 𝑔 𝜈 𝜇 g^{\nu\mu} italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT from Eq.(42 ) and substituting it into Eq.(36 ), we obtain the equation
Report issue for preceding element
( Γ 0 [ ( ε w + 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − ( m w + 𝒮 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 ] 1 / 2 ) 2 − limit-from superscript superscript Γ 0 superscript delimited-[] superscript subscript 𝜀 𝑤 superscript 𝒜 0 𝒙 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 𝒮 𝒙 2 1 2 2 \displaystyle\Big{(}\Gamma^{0}[(\varepsilon_{w}+{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${%
x}$}))^{2}-(m_{w}+{\cal S}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}]^{1/2}\Big{)}^{2}- ( roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT -
( 𝚪 𝒑 ^ ) 2 ) Ψ ( E w , 𝒓 ) = [ 1 2 ( 𝝈 1 + 𝝈 2 ) 𝒑 ^ ] 2 Ψ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) , \displaystyle(\hbox{\boldmath${\Gamma}$}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}}})^{2}\Big%
{)}\Psi(E_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${r}$})=[\frac{1}{2}(\hbox{\boldmath${\sigma}$}_{%
1}+\hbox{\boldmath${\sigma}$}_{2}){\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}}}]^{2}\Psi(%
\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}), ( bold_Γ over^ start_ARG bold_italic_p end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) roman_Ψ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r ) = [ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( bold_italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) over^ start_ARG bold_italic_p end_ARG ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ψ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) ,
(43)
where Ψ ( ε w , 𝒓 ) Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒓 \Psi(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${r}$}) roman_Ψ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r ) is the 16-component spinor mentioned above in the current section.
Eq.(3 ) leads to the Dirac-like form of the motion equations for this spinor
Report issue for preceding element
Γ 0 [ ( ε w + 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − ( m w + 𝒮 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 ] 1 / 2 Ψ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) = subscript Γ 0 superscript delimited-[] superscript subscript 𝜀 𝑤 superscript 𝒜 0 𝒙 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 𝒮 𝒙 2 1 2 Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 absent \displaystyle\Gamma_{0}[(\varepsilon_{w}+{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^%
{2}-(m_{w}+{\cal S}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}]^{1/2}\Psi(\varepsilon_{w},%
\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})= roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ψ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) =
( 𝚪 + 𝑺 ) 𝒑 ^ Ψ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) , 𝚪 𝑺 ^ 𝒑 Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 \displaystyle(\hbox{\boldmath${\Gamma}$}+\hbox{\boldmath${S}$}){\hat{\hbox{%
\boldmath${p}$}}}\Psi(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}), ( bold_Γ + bold_italic_S ) over^ start_ARG bold_italic_p end_ARG roman_Ψ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) ,
(44)
Γ 0 [ ( ε w + 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − ( m w + 𝒮 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 ] 1 / 2 Ψ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) = subscript Γ 0 superscript delimited-[] superscript subscript 𝜀 𝑤 superscript 𝒜 0 𝒙 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 𝒮 𝒙 2 1 2 Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 absent \displaystyle\Gamma_{0}[(\varepsilon_{w}+{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^%
{2}-(m_{w}+{\cal S}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}]^{1/2}\Psi(\varepsilon_{w},%
\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})= roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ψ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) =
( 𝚪 − 𝑺 ) 𝒑 ^ Ψ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) , 𝚪 𝑺 ^ 𝒑 Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 \displaystyle(\hbox{\boldmath${\Gamma}$}-\hbox{\boldmath${S}$}){\hat{\hbox{%
\boldmath${p}$}}}\Psi(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}), ( bold_Γ - bold_italic_S ) over^ start_ARG bold_italic_p end_ARG roman_Ψ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) ,
(45)
where 𝒑 = − i ∇ 𝒑 𝑖 ∇ \hbox{\boldmath${p}$}=-i\nabla bold_italic_p = - italic_i ∇ ; 𝒑 ^ = 𝒑 + 𝑨 ( 𝒙 ) ^ 𝒑 𝒑 𝑨 𝒙 {\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}}}={{\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}}}+{\cal\hbox{\boldmath${%
A}$}}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}) over^ start_ARG bold_italic_p end_ARG = bold_italic_p + bold_italic_A ( bold_italic_x ) , 𝑺 = ( 𝝈 1 + 𝝈 2 ) / 2 𝑺 subscript 𝝈 1 subscript 𝝈 2 2 \hbox{\boldmath${S}$}=(\hbox{\boldmath${\sigma}$}_{1}+\hbox{\boldmath${\sigma}%
$}_{2})/2 bold_italic_S = ( bold_italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + bold_italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) / 2 in Eqs.(3 ), (3 ) is assumed to be multiplied by I ( 1 + 2 ) superscript 𝐼 1 2 \stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}} start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP . It is very important to mention that such a structure of the γ μ superscript 𝛾 𝜇 \gamma^{\mu} italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT matrices defined by Eq.(3 ) leads to decoupling (see, also Appendix B) the motion equation (3 ) in four independent equation as compared with the previous researchesSad86-1 ; Sad86-2 ; Sad89 ; Cra84 ; Cra87 ; Cra90 ; Cra01 ; Cra03 ; Cra10 .
Report issue for preceding element
Assuming the Eq.(3 ) is the leading, let us establish the physical sense of Eqs.(3 ). To clarify it we change the numbers of particles in the two-body system. According to Eq. (3 ) this procedure consists in changing 𝒑 → − 𝒑 , 𝚪 → − 𝚪 formulae-sequence → 𝒑 𝒑 → 𝚪 𝚪 \hbox{\boldmath${p}$}\to-\hbox{\boldmath${p}$},~{}\hbox{\boldmath${\Gamma}$}%
\to-\hbox{\boldmath${\Gamma}$} bold_italic_p → - bold_italic_p , bold_Γ → - bold_Γ . Making the changes mentioned above in Eq.(3 ), we obtain the equation
which coincides with Eq.(3 ). Thus, choosing the leading equation among Eqs.(3 ) and Eq.(3 ) means fixation of particle numbering.
Report issue for preceding element
Provided that Ψ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 \Psi(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}) roman_Ψ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) is governed by Eq.(3 ), the direct calculations give that the Dirac conjugated field Ψ ¯ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) = Ψ † ( ε w , 𝒙 ) Γ 0 ¯ Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 superscript Ψ † subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 superscript Γ 0 {\bar{\Psi}}(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})={\Psi}^{\dagger}(%
\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})\Gamma^{0} over¯ start_ARG roman_Ψ end_ARG ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) = roman_Ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT satisfies an equation
Report issue for preceding element
Ψ ¯ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) Γ 0 [ ( ε w + 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − ( m w + 𝒮 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 ] 1 / 2 = ¯ Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 subscript Γ 0 superscript delimited-[] superscript subscript 𝜀 𝑤 superscript 𝒜 0 𝒙 2 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 𝒮 𝒙 2 1 2 absent \displaystyle{\bar{\Psi}}(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})\Gamma_{0}[(%
\varepsilon_{w}+{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}-(m_{w}+{\cal S}(\hbox%
{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}]^{1/2}= over¯ start_ARG roman_Ψ end_ARG ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =
− Ψ ¯ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) ( 𝚪 + 𝑺 ) 𝒑 ← ^ . ¯ Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 𝚪 𝑺 ^ ← 𝒑 \displaystyle-{\bar{\Psi}}(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})(\hbox{%
\boldmath${\Gamma}$}+\hbox{\boldmath${S}$}){\hat{{\overleftarrow{\hbox{%
\boldmath${p}$}}}}}. - over¯ start_ARG roman_Ψ end_ARG ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) ( bold_Γ + bold_italic_S ) over^ start_ARG over← start_ARG bold_italic_p end_ARG end_ARG .
(46)
3.1 Lagrangian and current of fermions in the center-mass and relative motion variables Report issue for preceding element
Eqs.(3 ), (3 ) allow us to derive the Lagrangian governing the dynamics of the two-body system in an external field which is
Report issue for preceding element
𝔏 = 1 2 Ψ ¯ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) { ( Γ 0 [ ( ε w + 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − ( m w + 𝒮 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 ] 1 / 2 − \displaystyle{\mathfrak{L}}=\frac{1}{2}{\bar{\Psi}}(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{%
\boldmath${x}$})\Bigg{\{}\Big{(}\Gamma_{0}[(\varepsilon_{w}+{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox%
{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}-(m_{w}+{\cal S}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}]^{1/2}- fraktur_L = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG over¯ start_ARG roman_Ψ end_ARG ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) { ( roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT -
( 𝚪 + 𝑺 ) 𝒑 ^ ) + ( Γ 0 [ ( ε w + 𝒜 0 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 − ( m w + 𝒮 ( 𝒙 ) ) 2 ] 1 / 2 + \displaystyle(\hbox{\boldmath${\Gamma}$}+\hbox{\boldmath${S}$}){\hat{\hbox{%
\boldmath${p}$}}}\Big{)}+\Big{(}\Gamma_{0}[(\varepsilon_{w}+{\cal A}^{0}(\hbox%
{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}-(m_{w}+{\cal S}(\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}))^{2}]^{1/2}+ ( bold_Γ + bold_italic_S ) over^ start_ARG bold_italic_p end_ARG ) + ( roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT +
( 𝚪 + 𝑺 ) 𝒑 ← ^ ) } Ψ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) \displaystyle(\hbox{\boldmath${\Gamma}$}+\hbox{\boldmath${S}$}){\hat{{%
\overleftarrow{\hbox{\boldmath${p}$}}}}}\Big{)}\Bigg{\}}\Psi(\varepsilon_{w},%
\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}) ( bold_Γ + bold_italic_S ) over^ start_ARG over← start_ARG bold_italic_p end_ARG end_ARG ) } roman_Ψ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x )
(47)
Such a Lagrangian generates the current
Report issue for preceding element
𝑱 ( E w , 𝒓 ) = Ψ ¯ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) ( 𝚪 + 𝑺 ) Ψ ( ε w , 𝒙 ) , 𝑱 subscript 𝐸 𝑤 𝒓 ¯ Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 𝚪 𝑺 Ψ subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 \displaystyle{\hbox{\boldmath${J}$}}(E_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${r}$})={\bar{\Psi}(%
\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$})}(\hbox{\boldmath${\Gamma}$}+\hbox{%
\boldmath${S}$})\Psi(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x}$}), bold_italic_J ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r ) = over¯ start_ARG roman_Ψ end_ARG ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) ( bold_Γ + bold_italic_S ) roman_Ψ ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) ,
(48)
whose conservation can be expressed in terms of the continuity equation.
Report issue for preceding element
∇ 𝑱 ( ε w , 𝒙 ) = 0 . ∇ 𝑱 subscript 𝜀 𝑤 𝒙 0 \displaystyle\nabla~{}\hbox{\boldmath${J}$}(\varepsilon_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${x%
}$})=0. ∇ bold_italic_J ( italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_x ) = 0 .
(49)
4 A positronium in a strong magnetic field Report issue for preceding element
We apply the obtained result to a study of observable physical phenomena, by considering a positronium in a strong uniform magnetic field. Such a problem is important in the astrophysics when the electromagnetic signals coming from the astrophysical objects such as pulsars or neutron starsBro ; Bus , whose energy is about 0.511 M e V 0.511 𝑀 𝑒 𝑉 0.511MeV 0.511 italic_M italic_e italic_V , likely correspond to the electromagnetic decay of the positronium ground state into two photons.
Report issue for preceding element
We study positronium states in a magnetic field in the Breit frame. Then, ε w = E w subscript 𝜀 𝑤 subscript 𝐸 𝑤 \varepsilon_{w}=E_{w} italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in left-hand side of Eq.(3 ). After that we take the scalar potential 𝒮 ( 𝒓 ) = 0 𝒮 𝒓 0 {\cal S}(\hbox{\boldmath${r}$})=0 caligraphic_S ( bold_italic_r ) = 0 therein, and direct the magnetic field 𝑩 𝑩 {B} bold_italic_B along the O Z 𝑂 𝑍 OZ italic_O italic_Z axis. Further, we go to the second order equitation, by acting on Eq.(3 ) with the left-hand side operator of Eq.(3 ). As a result, we get
Report issue for preceding element
( △ + 2 ( 4 π α ) E w r + ( 4 π α ) 2 r 2 + i π α ∇ ( 𝑩 × 𝝆 ) − \displaystyle\Big{(}\triangle+\frac{2(4\pi\alpha)E_{w}}{r}+\frac{(4\pi\alpha)^%
{2}}{r^{2}}+i\sqrt{\pi\alpha}\nabla(\hbox{\boldmath${B}$}\times\hbox{\boldmath%
${\rho}$})- ( △ + divide start_ARG 2 ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r end_ARG + divide start_ARG ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_i square-root start_ARG italic_π italic_α end_ARG ∇ ( bold_italic_B × bold_italic_ρ ) -
(50)
4 π α B 2 ρ 2 − m w 2 + E w 2 ) ( 1 0 0 1 ) Ψ ( E w , 𝒓 ) \displaystyle 4\pi\alpha B^{2}\rho^{2}-m_{w}^{2}+E_{w}^{2}\Big{)}\begin{%
pmatrix}1&0\\
0&1\end{pmatrix}\Psi(E_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${r}$}) 4 italic_π italic_α italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 1 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) roman_Ψ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r )
= − π α ( σ z , 1 + σ z , 2 0 0 σ z , 1 + σ z , 2 ) Ψ ( E w , 𝒓 ) , absent 𝜋 𝛼 matrix subscript 𝜎 𝑧 1
subscript 𝜎 𝑧 2
0 0 subscript 𝜎 𝑧 1
subscript 𝜎 𝑧 2
Ψ subscript 𝐸 𝑤 𝒓 \displaystyle=-\sqrt{\pi\alpha}\begin{pmatrix}\sigma_{z,1}+\sigma_{z,2}&0\\
0&\sigma_{z,1}+\sigma_{z,2}\end{pmatrix}\Psi(E_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${r}$}), = - square-root start_ARG italic_π italic_α end_ARG ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) roman_Ψ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r ) ,
where α = e 2 / 4 π 𝛼 superscript 𝑒 2 4 𝜋 \alpha=e^{2}/4\pi italic_α = italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 4 italic_π is the fine structure constant; σ z ( 1 , 2 ) subscript 𝜎 𝑧 1 2 \sigma_{z(1,2)} italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z ( 1 , 2 ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the Pauli matrices acting on the spin variables of the first (an electron) and the second (a positron) particle. In obtaining the latest equation we have taken
Report issue for preceding element
A i n t μ = ( A i n t 0 , 0 ) = ( − 4 π α r , 0 ) ; 𝒜 e x t = 1 2 ( 𝑩 × 𝒓 ) . formulae-sequence subscript superscript 𝐴 𝜇 𝑖 𝑛 𝑡 subscript superscript 𝐴 0 𝑖 𝑛 𝑡 0 4 𝜋 𝛼 𝑟 0 subscript 𝒜 𝑒 𝑥 𝑡 1 2 𝑩 𝒓 \displaystyle A^{\mu}_{int}=(A^{0}_{int},0)=(-\frac{4\pi\alpha}{r},0);~{}{\cal
A%
}_{ext}=\frac{1}{2}(\hbox{\boldmath${B}$}\times\hbox{\boldmath${r}$}). italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_n italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_n italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 ) = ( - divide start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_α end_ARG start_ARG italic_r end_ARG , 0 ) ; caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_x italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( bold_italic_B × bold_italic_r ) .
(51)
Eq.(50 ) contains two diagonal matrices that allows us to go to two-component functions Ψ ( E w , 𝒓 ) Ψ subscript 𝐸 𝑤 𝒓 \Psi(E_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${r}$}) roman_Ψ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r )
Report issue for preceding element
( △ + 2 ( 4 π α ) E w r + ( 4 π α ) 2 r 2 + i π α ∇ ( 𝑩 × 𝒓 ) − \displaystyle\Big{(}\triangle+\frac{2(4\pi\alpha)E_{w}}{r}+\frac{(4\pi\alpha)^%
{2}}{r^{2}}+i\sqrt{\pi\alpha}\nabla(\hbox{\boldmath${B}$}\times\hbox{\boldmath%
${r}$})- ( △ + divide start_ARG 2 ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r end_ARG + divide start_ARG ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + italic_i square-root start_ARG italic_π italic_α end_ARG ∇ ( bold_italic_B × bold_italic_r ) -
4 π α B 2 ρ 2 − m w 2 + E w 2 ) Ψ ( E w , 𝒓 ) \displaystyle 4\pi\alpha B^{2}\rho^{2}-m_{w}^{2}+E_{w}^{2}\Big{)}\Psi(E_{w},%
\hbox{\boldmath${r}$}) 4 italic_π italic_α italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) roman_Ψ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r )
= − π α ( σ z , 1 + σ z , 2 ) Ψ ( E w , 𝒓 ) . absent 𝜋 𝛼 subscript 𝜎 𝑧 1
subscript 𝜎 𝑧 2
Ψ subscript 𝐸 𝑤 𝒓 \displaystyle=-\sqrt{\pi\alpha}(\sigma_{z,1}+\sigma_{z,2})\Psi(E_{w},\hbox{%
\boldmath${r}$}). = - square-root start_ARG italic_π italic_α end_ARG ( italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) roman_Ψ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r ) .
(52)
We study the low energy states (S = S z = 0 𝑆 subscript 𝑆 𝑧 0 S=S_{z}=0 italic_S = italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 ) of a positronium, which are differed by the spin number S 𝑆 S italic_S , in a strong magnetic field 𝑩 𝑩 {B} bold_italic_B when the magnetic length a = ( 2 π α B ) − 1 / 2 𝑎 superscript 2 𝜋 𝛼 𝐵 1 2 a=(2\sqrt{\pi\alpha}B)^{-1/2} italic_a = ( 2 square-root start_ARG italic_π italic_α end_ARG italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is much smaller than the positronium Bohr radius a B = 1 / 2 π α m e subscript 𝑎 𝐵 1 2 𝜋 𝛼 subscript 𝑚 𝑒 a_{B}=1/2\pi\alpha m_{e} italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 2 italic_π italic_α italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Report issue for preceding element
a ≪ a B , much-less-than 𝑎 subscript 𝑎 𝐵 \displaystyle~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{%
}~{}a\ll a_{B}, italic_a ≪ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,
(53)
where m e subscript 𝑚 𝑒 m_{e} italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the electron mass.
Report issue for preceding element
However, the ground state (S = S z = 0 𝑆 subscript 𝑆 𝑧 0 S=S_{z}=0 italic_S = italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 ) turn out to be mixedLL4 with the triplet spin state ( S = 1 , S z = 0 ) formulae-sequence 𝑆 1 subscript 𝑆 𝑧 0 (S=1,S_{z}=0) ( italic_S = 1 , italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 ) due to the right-hand side terms in Eq.(4 ). Therefore, we look for solution of this equation as follows
Report issue for preceding element
Ψ ( E w , 𝒓 ) = ψ m = 0 , n = 0 ( 𝝆 ) 2 ∑ S = 0 1 ( ( 1 0 ) 1 ( 0 1 ) 2 + ( − 1 ) S + 1 ( 0 1 ) 1 ( 1 0 ) 2 ) ψ S ( z ) , Ψ subscript 𝐸 𝑤 𝒓 subscript 𝜓 formulae-sequence 𝑚 0 𝑛 0 𝝆 2 superscript subscript 𝑆 0 1 subscript matrix 1 0 1 subscript matrix 0 1 2 superscript 1 𝑆 1 subscript matrix 0 1 1 subscript matrix 1 0 2 subscript 𝜓 𝑆 𝑧 \displaystyle\Psi(E_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${r}$})=\frac{\psi_{m=0,n=0}(\hbox{%
\boldmath${\rho}$})}{\sqrt{2}}\sum\limits_{S=0}^{1}\Bigg{(}\begin{pmatrix}1\\
0\end{pmatrix}_{1}\begin{pmatrix}0\\
1\end{pmatrix}_{2}+(-1)^{S+1}\begin{pmatrix}0\\
1\end{pmatrix}_{1}\begin{pmatrix}1\\
0\end{pmatrix}_{2}\Bigg{)}\psi_{S}(z), roman_Ψ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r ) = divide start_ARG italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m = 0 , italic_n = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_ρ ) end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_z ) ,
(54)
where the indexes mean the number of a particle; ψ m = 0 , n = 0 ( 𝝆 ) subscript 𝜓 formulae-sequence 𝑚 0 𝑛 0 𝝆 \psi_{m=0,n=0}(\hbox{\boldmath${\rho}$}) italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m = 0 , italic_n = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_ρ ) is the wave function governing the transverse motion of a particle in the ground state in a magnetic fieldLL3 , which is equal to
Report issue for preceding element
ψ m = 0 , n = 0 ( 𝝆 ) = 1 a 2 π exp ( − ρ 2 4 a 2 ) . subscript 𝜓 formulae-sequence 𝑚 0 𝑛 0 𝝆 1 𝑎 2 𝜋 superscript 𝜌 2 4 superscript 𝑎 2 \displaystyle\psi_{m=0,n=0}(\hbox{\boldmath${\rho}$})=\frac{1}{a\sqrt{2\pi}}%
\exp{\left(-\frac{\rho^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right)}. italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m = 0 , italic_n = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_ρ ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_a square-root start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG end_ARG roman_exp ( - divide start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) .
(55)
Here the cylindrical coordinates 𝒓 = 𝝆 + 𝒆 z z 𝒓 𝝆 subscript 𝒆 𝑧 𝑧 \hbox{\boldmath${r}$}=\hbox{\boldmath${\rho}$}+\hbox{\boldmath${e}$}_{z}z bold_italic_r = bold_italic_ρ + bold_italic_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z are introduced, m 𝑚 m italic_m is the projection of an angular momentum along the 𝑩 𝑩 {B} bold_italic_B direction, n 𝑛 n italic_n is a radial quantum number.
Substituting Ψ ( E w , 𝒓 ) Ψ subscript 𝐸 𝑤 𝒓 \Psi(E_{w},\hbox{\boldmath${r}$}) roman_Ψ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_italic_r ) given by Eq.(54 ) into Eq.(4 ), we derive
Report issue for preceding element
( d 2 d ξ 2 + 2 1 / 2 π ( 4 π α ) E w a e ξ 2 / 2 e r f c ( | ξ | / 2 ) + \displaystyle\Big{(}\frac{d^{2}}{d\xi^{2}}+2^{1/2}\sqrt{\pi}(4\pi\alpha)E_{w}a%
~{}e^{\xi^{2}/2}erfc(|\xi|/\sqrt{2})+ ( divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e italic_r italic_f italic_c ( | italic_ξ | / square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) +
( 4 π α ) 2 e ξ 2 / 2 2 E 1 ( ξ 2 / 2 ) − ε S 2 ) ψ S ( ξ ) = − 2 π α ψ 1 − S ( ξ ) , \displaystyle\frac{(4\pi\alpha)^{2}e^{\xi^{2}/2}}{2}E_{1}(\xi^{2}/2)-%
\varepsilon^{2}_{S}\Big{)}\psi_{S}(\xi)=-2\sqrt{\pi\alpha}\psi_{1-S}(\xi), divide start_ARG ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 ) - italic_ε start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) = - 2 square-root start_ARG italic_π italic_α end_ARG italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ,
where the introduced e r f c ( x ) 𝑒 𝑟 𝑓 𝑐 𝑥 erfc(x) italic_e italic_r italic_f italic_c ( italic_x ) is the complementary error function, E 1 ( x ) subscript 𝐸 1 𝑥 E_{1}(x) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) is the integral exponentGra . We have also denoted in Eq.(4 )
Report issue for preceding element
z / a ≡ ξ , ( m w 2 − E w 2 ) a 2 + 1 + ( − 1 ) S + 1 ≡ ε S 2 . formulae-sequence 𝑧 𝑎 𝜉 superscript subscript 𝑚 𝑤 2 superscript subscript 𝐸 𝑤 2 superscript 𝑎 2 1 superscript 1 𝑆 1 superscript subscript 𝜀 𝑆 2 \displaystyle z/a\equiv\xi,~{}~{}(m_{w}^{2}-E_{w}^{2})a^{2}+1+(-1)^{S+1}\equiv%
\varepsilon_{S}^{2}. italic_z / italic_a ≡ italic_ξ , ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 + ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≡ italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .
(57)
Since the magnetic field is strong the particle is weakly bound with respect to a motion along the O Z 𝑂 𝑍 OZ italic_O italic_Z axis as compared with the transverse motion. Besides that, the term
Report issue for preceding element
− U ( ξ ) ≡ ( 2 1 / 2 π ( 4 π α ) E w a e ξ 2 / 2 e r f c ( | ξ | / 2 ) + \displaystyle-U(\xi)\equiv\Bigg{(}2^{1/2}\sqrt{\pi}(4\pi\alpha)E_{w}ae^{\xi^{2%
}/2}erfc(|\xi|/\sqrt{2})+ - italic_U ( italic_ξ ) ≡ ( 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e italic_r italic_f italic_c ( | italic_ξ | / square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) +
( 4 π α ) 2 e ξ 2 / 2 2 E 1 ( ξ 2 / 2 ) ) \displaystyle\frac{(4\pi\alpha)^{2}e^{\xi^{2}/2}}{2}E_{1}(\xi^{2}/2)\Bigg{)} divide start_ARG ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 ) )
(58)
is weakly singular since U ( ξ ) ∝ − 1 / ξ proportional-to 𝑈 𝜉 1 𝜉 U(\xi)\propto-1/\sqrt{\xi} italic_U ( italic_ξ ) ∝ - 1 / square-root start_ARG italic_ξ end_ARG at small ξ → 0 → 𝜉 0 \xi\to 0 italic_ξ → 0 . Therefore, we change the exact potential U ( ξ ) 𝑈 𝜉 U(\xi) italic_U ( italic_ξ ) by its approximate form
Report issue for preceding element
U ( ξ ) ≃ δ ( ξ ) ∫ − ∞ + ∞ ψ S ∗ ( ξ ) U ( ξ ) ψ S ( ξ ) 𝑑 ξ , similar-to-or-equals 𝑈 𝜉 𝛿 𝜉 superscript subscript subscript superscript 𝜓 ∗ 𝑆 𝜉 𝑈 𝜉 subscript 𝜓 𝑆 𝜉 differential-d 𝜉 \displaystyle U(\xi)\simeq\delta(\xi)\int\limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\psi^{\ast%
}_{S}(\xi)U(\xi)\psi_{S}(\xi)d\xi, italic_U ( italic_ξ ) ≃ italic_δ ( italic_ξ ) ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) italic_U ( italic_ξ ) italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) italic_d italic_ξ ,
(59)
where ψ S ( ξ ) subscript 𝜓 𝑆 𝜉 \psi_{S}(\xi) italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) satisfies an equation
Report issue for preceding element
( d 2 d ξ 2 − δ ( ξ ) ( ∫ − ∞ + ∞ ψ S ∗ ( ξ ′ ) U ( ξ ′ ) ψ S ( ξ ′ ) 𝑑 ξ ′ ) − ε S 2 ) ψ S ( ξ ) = superscript 𝑑 2 𝑑 superscript 𝜉 2 𝛿 𝜉 superscript subscript subscript superscript 𝜓 ∗ 𝑆 superscript 𝜉 ′ 𝑈 superscript 𝜉 ′ subscript 𝜓 𝑆 superscript 𝜉 ′ differential-d superscript 𝜉 ′ subscript superscript 𝜀 2 𝑆 subscript 𝜓 𝑆 𝜉 absent \displaystyle\Big{(}\frac{d^{2}}{d\xi^{2}}-\delta(\xi)(\int\limits_{-\infty}^{%
+\infty}\psi^{\ast}_{S}(\xi^{\prime})U(\xi^{\prime})\psi_{S}(\xi^{\prime})d\xi%
^{\prime})-\varepsilon^{2}_{S}\Big{)}\psi_{S}(\xi)= ( divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - italic_δ ( italic_ξ ) ( ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_U ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_d italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - italic_ε start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) =
− 2 π α ψ 1 − S ( ξ ) , 2 𝜋 𝛼 subscript 𝜓 1 𝑆 𝜉 \displaystyle-2\sqrt{\pi\alpha}\psi_{1-S}(\xi), - 2 square-root start_ARG italic_π italic_α end_ARG italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ,
We substitute ψ S ( ξ ) subscript 𝜓 𝑆 𝜉 \psi_{S}(\xi) italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) , given by the formula
Report issue for preceding element
ψ S ( ξ ) = k S exp ( − k S | ξ | ) , subscript 𝜓 𝑆 𝜉 subscript 𝑘 𝑆 subscript 𝑘 𝑆 𝜉 \displaystyle\psi_{S}(\xi)=\sqrt{k_{S}}\exp(-k_{S}|\xi|), italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) = square-root start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG roman_exp ( - italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_ξ | ) ,
(61)
into Eq.(4 ), where k S = ε S subscript 𝑘 𝑆 subscript 𝜀 𝑆 k_{S}=\sqrt{\varepsilon}_{S} italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_ε end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a positive constant. As a result, we derive the equation to obtain k S subscript 𝑘 𝑆 k_{S} italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Report issue for preceding element
k S = ( 4 π α ) 2 ∫ 0 ∞ 𝑑 ξ exp ( ξ 2 / 2 − 2 k S ξ ) E 1 ( ξ 2 / 2 ) + subscript 𝑘 𝑆 limit-from superscript 4 𝜋 𝛼 2 superscript subscript 0 differential-d 𝜉 superscript 𝜉 2 2 2 subscript 𝑘 𝑆 𝜉 subscript 𝐸 1 superscript 𝜉 2 2 \displaystyle k_{S}={(4\pi\alpha)^{2}}\int\limits_{0}^{\infty}d\xi\exp{({\xi^{%
2}/2}-2k_{S}\xi)}E_{1}(\xi^{2}/2)+ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_ξ roman_exp ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 - 2 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 ) +
2 3 / 2 π ( 4 π α ) E w a ∫ 0 ∞ 𝑑 ξ exp ( ξ 2 / 2 − 2 k S ξ ) e r f c ( ξ / 2 ) superscript 2 3 2 𝜋 4 𝜋 𝛼 subscript 𝐸 𝑤 𝑎 superscript subscript 0 differential-d 𝜉 superscript 𝜉 2 2 2 subscript 𝑘 𝑆 𝜉 𝑒 𝑟 𝑓 𝑐 𝜉 2 \displaystyle 2^{3/2}\sqrt{\pi}(4\pi\alpha)E_{w}a\int\limits_{0}^{\infty}d\xi%
\exp{({\xi^{2}/2}-2k_{S}\xi)}erfc(\xi/\sqrt{2}) 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_ξ roman_exp ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 - 2 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) italic_e italic_r italic_f italic_c ( italic_ξ / square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG )
The validity limit of the derived equation is k S ≪ 1 much-less-than subscript 𝑘 𝑆 1 k_{S}\ll 1 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ 1 . At such k S subscript 𝑘 𝑆 k_{S} italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the second integral is approximately π 3 / 2 / 2 superscript 𝜋 3 2 2 \pi^{3/2}/\sqrt{2} italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG Gra , whereas the first integral can be approximately taken to be equal to ln ( a B / a ) / π subscript 𝑎 𝐵 𝑎 𝜋 \ln(a_{B}/a)/\sqrt{\pi} roman_ln ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) / square-root start_ARG italic_π end_ARG LL3 after the dimensional regularization.
Report issue for preceding element
As a result, we find
Report issue for preceding element
k S = 2 3 / 2 ( 4 π α ) E w a ln ( a B / a ) + ( 4 π α ) 2 π 3 / 2 2 . subscript 𝑘 𝑆 superscript 2 3 2 4 𝜋 𝛼 subscript 𝐸 𝑤 𝑎 subscript 𝑎 𝐵 𝑎 superscript 4 𝜋 𝛼 2 superscript 𝜋 3 2 2 \displaystyle k_{S}=2^{3/2}(4\pi\alpha)E_{w}a\ln(a_{B}/a)+(4\pi\alpha)^{2}%
\frac{\pi^{3/2}}{\sqrt{2}}. italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a roman_ln ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) + ( 4 italic_π italic_α ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG .
(63)
In the non-relativistic case m e a ≫ α much-greater-than subscript 𝑚 𝑒 𝑎 𝛼 m_{e}a\gg\alpha italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a ≫ italic_α we obtain k S = 2 3 / 2 ( 4 π α / 3 ) m e a ln ( a B / a ) subscript 𝑘 𝑆 superscript 2 3 2 4 𝜋 𝛼 3 subscript 𝑚 𝑒 𝑎 subscript 𝑎 𝐵 𝑎 k_{S}=2^{3/2}(4\pi\alpha/3)m_{e}a\ln(a_{B}/a) italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 italic_π italic_α / 3 ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a roman_ln ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) . Taking into account of Eq.(63 ), we derive
Report issue for preceding element
E w = m e 2 ( 1 + 2 ( 1 + ( − 1 ) S + 1 ) ( m e a ) 2 − \displaystyle E_{w}=\frac{m_{e}}{2}\Big{(}1+\frac{2(1+(-1)^{S+1})}{(m_{e}a)^{2%
}}- italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( 1 + divide start_ARG 2 ( 1 + ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG -
2 ( 4 π α / 3 ) 2 ln 2 ( a B / a ) ) , \displaystyle 2(4\pi\alpha/3)^{2}\ln^{2}(a_{B}/a)\Big{)}, 2 ( 4 italic_π italic_α / 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ln start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) ) ,
(64)
that relates to the results obtained earlierEll .
Report issue for preceding element
In the opposite limiting situation m e a ≪ α much-less-than subscript 𝑚 𝑒 𝑎 𝛼 m_{e}a\ll\alpha italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a ≪ italic_α , but provided that the vacuum polarization effects in a strong magnetic field are absentLL4 , we get k S = 9 ( 2 π ) 7 / 2 α 2 subscript 𝑘 𝑆 9 superscript 2 𝜋 7 2 superscript 𝛼 2 k_{S}=9(2\pi)^{7/2}\alpha^{2} italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 9 ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , that gives
Report issue for preceding element
E w ≃ 1 a 2 ( ( 1 + ( − 1 ) S + 1 ) − ( 2 π ) 7 α 4 / 162 ) . similar-to-or-equals subscript 𝐸 𝑤 1 superscript 𝑎 2 1 superscript 1 𝑆 1 superscript 2 𝜋 7 superscript 𝛼 4 162 \displaystyle E_{w}\simeq\frac{1}{a^{2}}((1+(-1)^{S+1})-(2\pi)^{7}\alpha^{4}/1%
62). italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( ( 1 + ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 162 ) .
(65)
The obtained E w subscript 𝐸 𝑤 E_{w} italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w end_POSTSUBSCRIPT sufficiently differs from the results has been derived above in the non-relativistic case. Eqs.(4 ), (65 ) show the stronger a magnetic field , the less the positronium level depth under the bottom of the main Landau zone.
Report issue for preceding element
4.1 Decay of the positronium ground state in a strong magnetic field Report issue for preceding element
The decay width Γ Γ \Gamma roman_Γ of a particle is proportional toGreen
Report issue for preceding element
Γ ≃ | ψ ( 0 ) | 2 M 2 , similar-to-or-equals Γ superscript 𝜓 0 2 superscript 𝑀 2 \displaystyle\Gamma\simeq\frac{|\psi(0)|^{2}}{M^{2}}, roman_Γ ≃ divide start_ARG | italic_ψ ( 0 ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ,
(66)
where ψ ( 0 ) 𝜓 0 \psi(0) italic_ψ ( 0 ) and M 𝑀 M italic_M are the wave function and mass of the decaying particle, respectively.
Report issue for preceding element
According to Eqs.(55 ), (61 ) the squared wave function module | ψ ( 0 ) | 2 superscript 𝜓 0 2 |\psi(0)|^{2} | italic_ψ ( 0 ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , depending on the absence or presence of a magnetic field, is of the order of
Report issue for preceding element
| ψ B = 0 ( 0 ) | 2 ∼ a B − 3 | ψ B ≠ 0 ( 0 ) | 2 ∼ 1 a B a 2 . formulae-sequence similar-to superscript subscript 𝜓 𝐵 0 0 2 superscript subscript 𝑎 𝐵 3 similar-to superscript subscript 𝜓 𝐵 0 0 2 1 subscript 𝑎 𝐵 superscript 𝑎 2 \displaystyle|\psi_{B=0}(0)|^{2}\sim a_{B}^{-3}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}|%
\psi_{B\neq 0}(0)|^{2}\sim\frac{1}{a_{B}a^{2}}. | italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ≠ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG .
(67)
The estimations given by Eq.(67 ) show that a strong magnetic field leads to sufficient increasing, in ( a B / a ) 2 ≫ 1 much-greater-than superscript subscript 𝑎 𝐵 𝑎 2 1 (a_{B}/a)^{2}\gg 1 ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_a ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≫ 1 times, the decay width as compared with the case B = 0 𝐵 0 B=0 italic_B = 0 . Such a behavior of the decay width in a magnetic field is a result of the additional compressing the electron-positron bound state by a magnetic field in the plane which is perpendicular to the 𝐁 𝐁 {\bf B} bold_B -direction.
Report issue for preceding element
Appendix A The transformation relation for Γ Γ \Gamma roman_Γ - matrices Report issue for preceding element
According to Eqs.(3 ) we have
Report issue for preceding element
Γ ^ = μ 1 γ ( 1 ) ⊗ I ( 2 ) + μ 2 γ ( 2 ) ⊗ I ( 1 ) , \displaystyle{\hat{\Gamma}}=\mu_{1}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma}}%
\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}}+\mu_{2}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{%
\gamma}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}}, over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ,
𝜸 ^ = 𝜸 ( 2 ) ⊗ I ( 1 ) − 𝜸 ( 1 ) ⊗ I ( 2 ) . \displaystyle{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}=\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{%
{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}}-%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\otimes\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}}. over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG = start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP - start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP .
(68)
The matrices Γ ^ ^ Γ {\hat{\Gamma}} over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG and 𝜸 ^ ^ 𝜸 \hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}} over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG are explicitly given by formulas
Report issue for preceding element
Γ ^ 0 = ( μ 1 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 ⊗ I ( 2 ) + μ 2 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 ⊗ I ( 1 ) ) = μ 1 ( γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 ) + μ 2 ( γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 ) \displaystyle{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}=(\mu_{1}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{%
0}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}}+\mu_{2}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)%
}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}})=\mu_{1}\begin{%
pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}+\mu_{2}\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}%
&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\\
\end{pmatrix} over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ) = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG )
(69)
𝜸 ^ = ( 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) ) − ( 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) ) , ^ 𝜸 matrix superscript 𝜸 2 0 0 0 0 superscript 𝜸 2 0 0 0 0 superscript 𝜸 2 0 0 0 0 superscript 𝜸 2 matrix superscript 𝜸 1 0 0 0 0 superscript 𝜸 1 0 0 0 0 superscript 𝜸 1 0 0 0 0 superscript 𝜸 1 \displaystyle{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}=\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}, over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG = ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ,
(70)
where a number in the brackets which is over γ 𝛾 \gamma italic_γ means that this matrix acts on the variable of the corresponding particle, I ( a ) superscript 𝐼 𝑎 \stackrel{{\scriptstyle(a)}}{{I}} start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_a ) end_ARG end_RELOP is the unit matrix in the space of the a 𝑎 a italic_a particle. Then, we obtain
Report issue for preceding element
( Γ ^ 0 Γ ^ 0 + Γ ^ 0 Γ ^ 0 ) = 2 Γ ^ 0 Γ ^ 0 = 2 ( μ 1 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 ⊗ I ( 2 ) + μ 2 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 ⊗ I ( 1 ) ) × \displaystyle({\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}{\hat{\Gamma}}_{0}+{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}{\hat{%
\Gamma}}_{0})=2{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}{\hat{\Gamma}}_{0}=2(\mu_{1}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}}+\mu_{2%
}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}%
{{I}})\times ( over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 2 over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ) ×
( μ 1 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 ⊗ I ( 2 ) + μ 2 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 ⊗ I ( 1 ) ) = 2 ( μ 1 2 I ( 1 + 2 ) + μ 2 2 I ( 1 + 2 ) + \displaystyle(\mu_{1}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\otimes%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}}+\mu_{2}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^%
{0}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}})=2(\mu_{1}^{2}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}}+\mu_{2}^{2}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}}+ ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ) = 2 ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP +
μ 1 μ 2 ( γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 ⊗ I ( 1 ) ⋅ γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 ⊗ I ( 2 ) + γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 ⊗ I ( 2 ) ⋅ γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 ⊗ I ( 1 ) ) ) \displaystyle\mu_{1}\mu_{2}(\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\otimes%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}}\cdot\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}%
}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}}+\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{%
\gamma^{0}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}}\cdot\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}})) italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⋅ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP + start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⋅ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ) )
= 2 ( μ 1 2 I ( 1 + 2 ) + μ 2 2 I ( 1 + 2 ) + 2 μ 1 μ 2 ( γ 0 ( 1 + 2 ) 0 ⋅ γ 0 ( 1 + 2 ) 0 ) ) = 2 I ( 1 + 2 ) , \displaystyle=2(\mu_{1}^{2}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}}+\mu_{2}^{2}%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}}+2\mu_{1}\mu_{2}(\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+%
2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\cdot\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}))=2%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}}, = 2 ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP + 2 italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⋅ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ) ) = 2 start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ,
where I ( 1 + 2 ) superscript 𝐼 1 2 \stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}} start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP is the ( 16 × 16 ) 16 16 (16\times 16) ( 16 × 16 ) unit matrix.
Report issue for preceding element
Calculation of the anti-commutator [ Γ ^ 0 , 𝜸 ^ ] + subscript superscript ^ Γ 0 ^ 𝜸 [{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0},{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}]_{+} [ over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG ] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT leads to the following results
Report issue for preceding element
Γ ^ 0 𝜸 ^ + 𝜸 ^ Γ ^ 0 = ( μ 1 ( γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 ) + μ 2 ( γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 ) ) × \displaystyle{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}+{\hat{\hbox{%
\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}=(\mu_{1}\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}+\mu_{2}\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}%
&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\\
\end{pmatrix})\times over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG + over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ) ×
( ( 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) ) − ( 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) ) ) + ( ( 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) ) − ( 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) ) ) × \displaystyle(\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\\
\end{pmatrix})+(\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\\
\end{pmatrix})\times ( ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ) + ( ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ) ×
( μ 1 ( γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 ) + μ 2 ( γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 ) ) subscript 𝜇 1 matrix superscript superscript 𝛾 0 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝛾 0 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝛾 0 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝛾 0 1 subscript 𝜇 2 matrix superscript superscript 𝛾 0 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝛾 0 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝛾 0 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝛾 0 2 \displaystyle(\mu_{1}\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}%
&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}+\mu_{2}\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}%
&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}) ( italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) )
(72)
Γ ^ 0 𝜸 ^ + 𝜸 ^ Γ ^ 0 = superscript ^ Γ 0 ^ 𝜸 ^ 𝜸 superscript ^ Γ 0 absent \displaystyle{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}+{\hat{\hbox{%
\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}= over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG + over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =
μ 1 ( ( γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) ) − ( γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) + ( 𝜸 ( 2 ) γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 ) ) \displaystyle\mu_{1}(\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}) italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) + ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) )
− ( 𝜸 ( 1 ) γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) γ 0 ( 1 ) 0 ) ) + μ 2 ( ( γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) ) − ( γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) \displaystyle-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\\
\end{pmatrix})+\mu_{2}(\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}%
}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\\
\end{pmatrix} - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ) + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG )
+ ( 𝜸 ( 2 ) γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 2 ) γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 ) ) − ( 𝜸 ( 1 ) γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) γ 0 2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 𝜸 ( 1 ) γ 0 ( 2 ) 0 ) ) . \displaystyle+\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\\
\end{pmatrix})-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle 2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\gamma^{0}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}). + ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ) .
Then, we finally derive
Report issue for preceding element
Γ ^ 0 𝜸 ^ + 𝜸 ^ Γ ^ 0 = 0 . superscript ^ Γ 0 ^ 𝜸 ^ 𝜸 superscript ^ Γ 0 0 \displaystyle{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}+{\hat{\hbox{%
\boldmath${\gamma}$}}}{\hat{\Gamma}}^{0}=0. over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG + over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ end_ARG over^ start_ARG roman_Γ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0 .
(74)
Let us go to the anti-commutator [ 𝜸 a ^ , 𝜸 b ^ ] + subscript ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑎 ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑏 [{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}},}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}%
]_{+} [ over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Report issue for preceding element
( 𝜸 a ^ 𝜸 b ^ + 𝜸 b ^ 𝜸 a ^ ) = ( 𝜸 a ( 2 ) a ⊗ I ( 1 ) − 𝜸 a ( 1 ) a ⊗ I ( 2 ) ) ( 𝜸 b ( 2 ) b ⊗ I ( 1 ) − 𝜸 b ( 1 ) b ⊗ I ( 2 ) ) \displaystyle({\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{b}}}+{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{a}}})=(\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a%
}}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}}-\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{%
\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}})(%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}}\otimes%
\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}}-\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{%
\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}}) ( over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) = ( start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP - start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ) ( start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP - start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP )
+ \displaystyle+ +
( 𝜸 b ( 2 ) b ⊗ I ( 1 ) − 𝜸 b ( 1 ) b ⊗ I ( 2 ) ) ( 𝜸 a ( 2 ) a ⊗ I ( 1 ) − 𝜸 a ( 1 ) a ⊗ I ( 2 ) ) . \displaystyle(\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}}%
\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}}-\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{%
\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}})(\stackrel{%
{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}}\otimes\stackrel{{%
\scriptstyle(1)}}{{I}}-\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$%
}^{a}}}\otimes\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{I}}). ( start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP - start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ) ( start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP - start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ⊗ start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP ) .
(75)
Substituting the explicit form of 𝜸 a ^ ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑎 {\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}} over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG we get
Report issue for preceding element
( 𝜸 a ^ 𝜸 b ^ + 𝜸 b ^ 𝜸 a ^ ) = ( ( 𝜸 a ( 2 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 2 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 2 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 2 ) a ) − ( 𝜸 a ( 1 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 1 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 1 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 1 ) a ) ) × ( ( 𝜸 b ( 2 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 2 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 2 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 2 ) b ) − ( 𝜸 b ( 1 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 1 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 1 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 1 ) b ) ) ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑎 ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑏 ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑏 ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑎 matrix superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 2 matrix superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 1 matrix superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 2 matrix superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 1 \displaystyle({\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{b}}}+{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{a}}})=(\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath%
${\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}\\
\end{pmatrix})\times(\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{%
\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}) ( over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) = ( ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ) × ( ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) )
+ ( ( 𝜸 b ( 2 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 2 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 2 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 2 ) b ) − ( 𝜸 b ( 1 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 1 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 1 ) b 0 0 0 0 𝜸 b ( 1 ) b ) ) × ( ( 𝜸 a ( 2 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 2 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 2 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 2 ) a ) − ( 𝜸 a ( 1 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 1 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 1 ) a 0 0 0 0 𝜸 a ( 1 ) a ) ) . matrix superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 2 matrix superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑏 1 matrix superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 2 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 2 matrix superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 1 0 0 0 0 superscript superscript 𝜸 𝑎 1 \displaystyle+(\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}\\
\end{pmatrix})\times(\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{%
\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(2)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0&0&0\\
0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0&0\\
0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}&0\\
0&0&0&\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1)}}{{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}\\
\end{pmatrix}). + ( ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ) × ( ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 ) end_ARG end_RELOP end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ) .
Making obvious transformation we derive
Report issue for preceding element
( 𝜸 a ^ 𝜸 b ^ + 𝜸 b ^ 𝜸 a ^ ) = 4 g a b I ( 1 + 2 ) / 2 + ( σ 1 a σ 2 b + σ 2 b σ 1 a + σ 2 a σ 1 b + σ 1 b σ 2 a ) I ( 1 + 2 ) / 2 ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑎 ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑏 ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑏 ^ superscript 𝜸 𝑎 4 superscript 𝑔 𝑎 𝑏 superscript 𝐼 1 2 2 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑎 superscript 𝐼 1 2 2 absent \displaystyle({\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{a}}}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{b}}}+{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${\gamma}$}^{b}}}{\hat{\hbox{\boldmath${%
\gamma}$}^{a}}})=4g^{ab}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)/2}}{{I}}+(\sigma_{1}^{a}%
\sigma_{2}^{b}+\sigma_{2}^{b}\sigma_{1}^{a}+\sigma_{2}^{a}\sigma_{1}^{b}+%
\sigma_{1}^{b}\sigma_{2}^{a})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)/2}}{{I}} ( over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG over^ start_ARG bold_italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) = 4 italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) / 2 end_ARG end_RELOP + ( italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) / 2 end_ARG end_RELOP
= − 4 δ a b I ( 1 + 2 ) + ( σ 1 a σ 2 b + σ 2 b σ 1 a + σ 2 a σ 1 b + σ 1 b σ 2 a ) I ( 1 + 2 ) / 2 . absent 4 superscript 𝛿 𝑎 𝑏 superscript 𝐼 1 2 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑎 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 1 𝑏 superscript subscript 𝜎 2 𝑎 superscript 𝐼 1 2 2 absent \displaystyle=-4\delta^{ab}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)}}{{I}}+(\sigma_{1}^{a}%
\sigma_{2}^{b}+\sigma_{2}^{b}\sigma_{1}^{a}+\sigma_{2}^{a}\sigma_{1}^{b}+%
\sigma_{1}^{b}\sigma_{2}^{a})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle(1+2)/2}}{{I}}. = - 4 italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) end_ARG end_RELOP + ( italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_RELOP SUPERSCRIPTOP start_ARG italic_I end_ARG start_ARG ( 1 + 2 ) / 2 end_ARG end_RELOP .