mathx”17

Quasi-invariance of the Gaussian measure for the two-dimensional stochastic cubic nonlinear wave equation

Justin Forlano and Leonardo Tolomeo Dedicated to the memory of Professor Giuseppe Da Prato Justin Forlano
School of Mathematics
The University of Edinburgh
and The Maxwell Institute for the Mathematical Sciences
James Clerk Maxwell Building
The King’s Buildings
Peter Guthrie Tait Road
Edinburgh
EH9 3FD
United Kingdom
[email protected] Leonardo Tolomeo
School of Mathematics
The University of Edinburgh
and The Maxwell Institute for the Mathematical Sciences
James Clerk Maxwell Building
The King’s Buildings
Peter Guthrie Tait Road
Edinburgh
EH9 3FD
United Kingdom
[email protected]
Abstract.

We consider the stochastic damped nonlinear wave equation t2u+tu+uΔu+u3=2sξsuperscriptsubscript𝑡2𝑢subscript𝑡𝑢𝑢Δ𝑢superscript𝑢32superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝜉\partial_{t}^{2}u+\partial_{t}u+u-\Delta u+u^{3}=\sqrt{2}{\langle{\nabla}% \rangle^{-s}}\xi∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u + ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u + italic_u - roman_Δ italic_u + italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ on the two-dimensional torus 𝕋2superscript𝕋2\mathbb{T}^{2}blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where ξ𝜉\xiitalic_ξ denotes a space-time white noise and s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0. We show that the measure μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT corresponding to the unique invariant measure for the flow of the associated linear equation is quasi-invariant under the nonlinear stochastic flow.

Key words and phrases:
stochastic nonlinear wave equation; invariant measure; white noise, quasi-invariance, gaussian measure, absolute continuity
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
35L15, 60H15

1. Introduction

We consider here the following stochastic damped nonlinear wave equation (SDNLW):

{t2u+tu+uΔu+u3=2sξ(u,tu)|t=0=(u0,u1)(t,x)+×𝕋2,casessuperscriptsubscript𝑡2𝑢subscript𝑡𝑢𝑢Δ𝑢superscript𝑢32superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝜉otherwiseevaluated-at𝑢subscript𝑡𝑢𝑡0subscript𝑢0subscript𝑢1otherwise𝑡𝑥subscriptsuperscript𝕋2\begin{cases}\partial_{t}^{2}u+\partial_{t}u+u-\Delta u+u^{3}=\sqrt{2}\langle% \nabla\rangle^{-s}\xi\\ (u,\partial_{t}u)|_{t=0}=(u_{0},u_{1})\end{cases}\qquad(t,x)\in\mathbb{R}_{+}% \times\mathbb{T}^{2},{ start_ROW start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u + ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u + italic_u - roman_Δ italic_u + italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( italic_u , ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW ( italic_t , italic_x ) ∈ blackboard_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (1.1)

where s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0, ξ𝜉\xiitalic_ξ is a space-time white noise, and ssuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT denotes the smoothing operator

s:=(1Δ)s2.assignsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠superscript1Δ𝑠2\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}:=(1-\Delta)^{-\frac{s}{2}}.⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := ( 1 - roman_Δ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (1.2)

In the following, we consider (1.1) as a first-order system in the variable 𝐮:=(u,v)assign𝐮superscript𝑢𝑣top{\mathbf{u}}:=(u,v)^{\top}bold_u := ( italic_u , italic_v ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊤ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,

{t𝐮=t(uv)=(011Δ1)(uv)(0u3)+(02sξ),𝐮|t=0=𝐮0=(u0u1).casessubscript𝑡𝐮subscript𝑡matrix𝑢𝑣matrix011Δ1matrix𝑢𝑣matrix0superscript𝑢3matrix02superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝜉otherwiseevaluated-at𝐮𝑡0subscript𝐮0matrixsubscript𝑢0subscript𝑢1otherwise\begin{cases}\partial_{t}{\mathbf{u}}=\partial_{t}\begin{pmatrix}u\\ v\end{pmatrix}=-\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\ 1-\Delta&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}u\\ v\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}0\\ u^{3}\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\ \sqrt{2}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\xi\end{pmatrix},\\ {\mathbf{u}}|_{t=0}={\mathbf{u}}_{0}=\begin{pmatrix}u_{0}\\ u_{1}\end{pmatrix}.\end{cases}{ start_ROW start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u = ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) = - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 1 - roman_Δ end_CELL start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) + ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) , end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL bold_u | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW (1.3)

The interest for the equation stemmed from recent results pertaining to the PDE construction of the Euclidean Φ4superscriptΦ4\Phi^{4}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT quantum field theory [11, 1, 2, 23, 24, 33]. Namely, if one considers the stochastic quantisation equation

tu+uΔu=u3+2ξ,subscript𝑡𝑢𝑢Δ𝑢superscript𝑢32𝜉\partial_{t}u+u-\Delta u=u^{3}+\sqrt{2}\xi,∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u + italic_u - roman_Δ italic_u = italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ξ , (1.4)

as time goes to infinity, we expect a generic solution to (1.4) to converge to the (massive) Φ4superscriptΦ4\Phi^{4}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-measure.

In the above context, the stochastic wave equation

t2u+tu+uΔu=u3+2ξ,superscriptsubscript𝑡2𝑢subscript𝑡𝑢𝑢Δ𝑢superscript𝑢32𝜉\partial_{t}^{2}u+\partial_{t}u+u-\Delta u=u^{3}+\sqrt{2}\xi,∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u + ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u + italic_u - roman_Δ italic_u = italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ξ , (1.5)

corresponds to the so-called canonical stochastic quantisation equation, or equivalently, to the kinetic Langevin equation for the Φ4superscriptΦ4\Phi^{4}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-measure with momentum v=tu𝑣subscript𝑡𝑢v=\partial_{t}uitalic_v = ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u. Therefore, one can sample the Φ4superscriptΦ4\Phi^{4}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-measure by sampling the law of the first component of the solution of (1.5). This procedure has the name of Hamiltonian Montecarlo (HCM). It has numerically been observed that in the finite dimensional setting, HCM converges faster than MCMC (Markov Chain Montecarlo) in many situations, see [14] (and references within), for a rigorous justification of these faster convergence rates.

As a consequence, equation (1.5) has received a substantial amount of attention in recent years, as an alternative approach to stochastic quantisation of the Φ4superscriptΦ4\Phi^{4}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT measure. However, due to the worse analytical properties of the wave propagator (t2Δ)1superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑡2Δ1(\partial_{t}^{2}-\Delta)^{-1}( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - roman_Δ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT compared to those of the heat propagator (tΔ)1superscriptsubscript𝑡Δ1(\partial_{t}-\Delta)^{-1}( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Δ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, there are far fewer results available, namely, uniqueness and convergence to the invariant measure have been proven by the second author only in [51] for dimension d=1𝑑1d=1italic_d = 1 and in [52] for dimension d=2𝑑2d=2italic_d = 2. Local and global well posedness results for related models, but without uniqueness of the measure, can be found in [25, 26, 50, 35, 36, 42].

In light of the above discussion, we see the equation (1.1) as a version of (1.5) in fractional dimension d=22s𝑑22𝑠d=2-2sitalic_d = 2 - 2 italic_s. A similar approach to fractional dimension has already been considered for the parabolic case of (1.4), see for instance [9]. In the work by the authors [18], it has been shown that equation (1.1) also has a unique invariant measure, to which we have convergence for every initial data belonging to a certain class. However, strictly speaking, the equation (1.1) is not a Langevin equation, because of the presence of the smoothing operator ssuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This prevents us from writing an explicit formula for the invariant measure, which in turn leaves many open questions. A fairly natural question to ask is the following. Denoting by μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the invariant measure for the linear equation

t2u+tu+uΔu=2sξ,superscriptsubscript𝑡2𝑢subscript𝑡𝑢𝑢Δ𝑢2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝜉\partial_{t}^{2}u+\partial_{t}u+u-\Delta u=\sqrt{2}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\xi,∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u + ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u + italic_u - roman_Δ italic_u = square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ ,

or more precisely, to the system

{t𝐮=t(uv)=(011Δ1)(uv)+(02sξ),𝐮|t=0=𝐮0=(u0u1).casessubscript𝑡𝐮subscript𝑡matrix𝑢𝑣matrix011Δ1matrix𝑢𝑣matrix02superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝜉otherwiseevaluated-at𝐮𝑡0subscript𝐮0matrixsubscript𝑢0subscript𝑢1otherwise\begin{cases}\partial_{t}{\mathbf{u}}=\partial_{t}\begin{pmatrix}u\\ v\end{pmatrix}=-\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\ 1-\Delta&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}u\\ v\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\ \sqrt{2}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\xi\end{pmatrix},\\ {\mathbf{u}}|_{t=0}={\mathbf{u}}_{0}=\begin{pmatrix}u_{0}\\ u_{1}\end{pmatrix}.\end{cases}{ start_ROW start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u = ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) = - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 1 - roman_Δ end_CELL start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) + ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) , end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL bold_u | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) . end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW

is it true that the invariant measure ρssubscript𝜌𝑠\vec{\rho}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of (1.1) satisfies ρsμsmuch-less-thansubscript𝜌𝑠subscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\rho}_{s}\ll\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT? As opposed to the invariant measure for the nonlinear equation, the measure μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT has an explicit formula, namely, it formally holds that

μs=Z1exp(12uH1+s212vHs2).subscript𝜇𝑠superscript𝑍112superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐻1𝑠212superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑣superscript𝐻𝑠2\displaystyle\vec{\mu}_{s}=Z^{-1}\exp\Big{(}-\frac{1}{2}\|u\|_{H^{1+s}}^{2}-% \frac{1}{2}\|v\|_{H^{s}}^{2}\Big{)}.over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_exp ( - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . (1.6)

Therefore, this absolute continuity property would allow us to bootstrap relevant properties of the invariant measure from the analogous properties of μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. However, while the analogous of this statement is relatively simple to show for the parabolic equation (1.4), for the wave case, it turns out to be a very difficult problem. Indeed, even in the case of the stochastic Navier-Stokes equation on 𝕋2superscript𝕋2\mathbb{T}^{2}blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,

tu=Δuuu+sξ,subscript𝑡𝑢Δ𝑢𝑢𝑢superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝜉\partial_{t}u=\Delta u-u\cdot\nabla u+\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\xi,∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u = roman_Δ italic_u - italic_u ⋅ ∇ italic_u + ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ , (1.7)

this question is still open since the original proof of the existence of the invariant measure in [16, 15]. Indeed, the current state-of-the art is that one can show that the invariant measure is absolutely continuous with respect to the stationary law of the linear solution when ΔΔ\Deltaroman_Δ is replaced with (Δ)1+εsuperscriptΔ1𝜀-(-\Delta)^{1+\varepsilon}- ( - roman_Δ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for some ε>0𝜀0\varepsilon>0italic_ε > 0, see [32].

A closely related question is the following: if Law(𝐮0)=μs,Lawsubscript𝐮0subscript𝜇𝑠\operatorname{Law}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})=\vec{\mu}_{s},roman_Law ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , is it true that Law(𝐮(t))μsmuch-less-thanLaw𝐮𝑡subscript𝜇𝑠\operatorname{Law}({\mathbf{u}}(t))\ll\vec{\mu}_{s}roman_Law ( bold_u ( italic_t ) ) ≪ over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT? If this happens, we say that the measure μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is quasi-invariant under the (stochastic) flow of (1.3). In the parabolic case of (1.4) and (1.7), or more in general, whenever one has the strong Feller property, the two questions are actually equivalent. Unfortunately, the strong Feller property fails for equation (1.3), and one cannot deduce absolute continuity of the invariant measure from quasi-invariance.

Quasi-invariance for the deterministic flow of Hamiltonian and dispersive PDEs in situations where the initial data is not distributed according to an invariant measure has been studied extensively in the last decade. This pursuit was initiated by Tzvetkov in [53] for the BBM equation, with many results following for a number of other Hamiltonian PDEs, see [53, 40, 41, 38, 39, 43, 20, 28, 45, 13, 21, 22, 44, 7, 17, 37, 19, 48, 10, 31] and references therein for a list of results in this direction. We point out the results in [41, 28, 45] prove quasi-invariance results in the case of the deterministic and undamped version of (1.1).

Nevertheless, the question of quasi-invariance for stochastic dispersive models is yet to be answered. In this paper, we prove the first of such results; in particular, we show the following.

Theorem 1.1.

For each s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0, let Φt(𝐮0;ξ)subscriptΦ𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉\Phi_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0};\xi)roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) denote the solution to SDNLW 1.1 with Law(𝐮0)=μsLawsubscript𝐮0subscript𝜇𝑠\operatorname{Law}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})=\vec{\mu}_{s}roman_Law ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Then for each t0𝑡0t\geq 0italic_t ≥ 0, the probability measure Law(Φt(𝐮0;ξ))LawsubscriptΦ𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉\textup{Law}(\Phi_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0};\xi))Law ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) ) is absolutely continuous with respect to μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

1.1. Outline of the proof

The proof of Theorem 1.1 will follow closely the strategy of the deterministic results in [41, 28, 45], hence we first describe how one obtains quasi-invariance of the measure μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for the deterministic equation

t2u+(1Δ)u+u3=0.superscriptsubscript𝑡2𝑢1Δ𝑢superscript𝑢30\partial_{t}^{2}u+(1-\Delta)u+u^{3}=0.∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u + ( 1 - roman_Δ ) italic_u + italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0 . (1.8)

One can formally see this equation as an infinite-dimensional system of ODEs in the form

y˙=b(y),˙𝑦𝑏𝑦\dot{y}=b(y),over˙ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG = italic_b ( italic_y ) ,

with div(b)=0div𝑏0\text{div}(b)=0div ( italic_b ) = 0 on some infinite-dimensional vector space X𝑋Xitalic_X. Therefore, denoting by ΦtsubscriptΦ𝑡\Phi_{t}roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the flow of this system of ODEs, for a measure ν0=exp(E(x))dxsubscript𝜈0𝐸𝑥𝑑𝑥\nu_{0}=\exp\big{(}-E(x)\big{)}dxitalic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_exp ( - italic_E ( italic_x ) ) italic_d italic_x and for any Borel set A𝐴Aitalic_A, one has that

ddtν0(Φt(A))=Φt(A)ddtE(Φt(x))|t=0dν0(x).𝑑𝑑𝑡subscript𝜈0subscriptΦ𝑡𝐴subscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝐴evaluated-at𝑑𝑑𝑡𝐸subscriptΦ𝑡𝑥𝑡0𝑑subscript𝜈0𝑥\frac{d}{dt}\nu_{0}(\Phi_{t}(A))=\int_{\Phi_{t}(A)}-\frac{d}{dt}\left.E(\Phi_{% t}(x))\right|_{t=0}d\nu_{0}(x).divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_A ) ) = ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_A ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG italic_E ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) ) | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) .

This allows to perform a Gronwall-type argument for the quantity ν0(Φt(E))subscript𝜈0subscriptΦ𝑡𝐸\nu_{0}(\Phi_{t}(E))italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_E ) ), from which one obtains that quasi-invariance holds whenever for every ball BRXsubscript𝐵𝑅𝑋B_{R}\subset Xitalic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊂ italic_X, there exists some ηR>0subscript𝜂𝑅0\eta_{R}>0italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 such that

BX(0,R)exp(ηR|ddtE(Φt(x))|t=0|)dν0<.\int_{B_{X}(0,R)}\exp\Big{(}\eta_{R}\big{|}\frac{d}{dt}\left.E(\Phi_{t}(x))% \right|_{t=0}\big{|}\Big{)}d\nu_{0}<\infty.∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 , italic_R ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_exp ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG italic_E ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) ) | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ) italic_d italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < ∞ . (1.9)

While not codified in this way, one can find a proof of this result in [43]. As the condition (1.9) does not hold for the measures μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, what is shown in [41, 28, 45] is that, for an appropriate range of s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0, if one defines the energy functional

E(u,v)=12uH1+s212vHs232(suσ)u2𝐸𝑢𝑣12superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐻1𝑠212superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑣superscript𝐻𝑠232superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝑢𝜎superscript𝑢2E(u,v)=\frac{1}{2}\|u\|_{H^{1+s}}^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\|v\|_{H^{s}}^{2}-\frac{3}{2}% \int\big{(}\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}u-\sigma\big{)}u^{2}italic_E ( italic_u , italic_v ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∫ ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u - italic_σ ) italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

with σ=𝔼μssuL22𝜎subscript𝔼subscript𝜇𝑠superscriptsubscriptnormsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝑢superscript𝐿22\sigma=\mathbb{E}_{\vec{\mu}_{s}}\|\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}u\|_{L^{2}}^{2}italic_σ = blackboard_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, then

μsZ1exp(E(u,v))dudvμs,much-less-thansubscript𝜇𝑠superscript𝑍1𝐸𝑢𝑣𝑑𝑢𝑑𝑣much-less-thansubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}\ll Z^{-1}\exp(-E(u,v))dudv\ll\vec{\mu}_{s},over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_exp ( - italic_E ( italic_u , italic_v ) ) italic_d italic_u italic_d italic_v ≪ over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,

and the property (1.9) holds.111The expression above must be considered formally, as σ=+𝜎\sigma=+\inftyitalic_σ = + ∞. Nevertheless, one can define the measure Z1exp(E(u,v))dudvsuperscript𝑍1𝐸𝑢𝑣𝑑𝑢𝑑𝑣Z^{-1}\exp(-E(u,v))dudvitalic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_exp ( - italic_E ( italic_u , italic_v ) ) italic_d italic_u italic_d italic_v via a renormalisation procedure.

In order to prove Theorem 1.1, we follow a similar approach in the stochastic setting. We define the measure

νsexp(12uH1+s212vHs232(suσ)u2)dudv,similar-tosubscript𝜈𝑠12superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐻1𝑠212superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑣superscript𝐻𝑠232superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝑢𝜎superscript𝑢2𝑑𝑢𝑑𝑣\vec{\nu}_{s}\sim\exp\Big{(}-\frac{1}{2}\|u\|_{H^{1+s}}^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\|v\|_{% H^{s}}^{2}-\frac{3}{2}\int\big{(}\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}u-\sigma\big{)}u^{2}% \Big{)}dudv,over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ roman_exp ( - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∫ ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u - italic_σ ) italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_d italic_u italic_d italic_v ,

and we try to show that under a condition analogous to (1.9), we can deduce quasi-invariance of the measure νssubscript𝜈𝑠\vec{\nu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in the sense of Theorem 1.1. Indeed, in Section 5, we first prove that the measure νssubscript𝜈𝑠\vec{\nu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT satisfies the alternative condition

BX(0,R)exp(ηR|ddt𝔼ξ[E(Φt(𝐮0,ξ))]|t=0|)dν0(𝐮0)<,\int_{B_{X}(0,R)}\exp\Big{(}\eta_{R}\big{|}\frac{d}{dt}\left.\mathbb{E}_{\xi}% \big{[}E(\Phi_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))\big{]}\right|_{t=0}\big{|}\Big{)}d\nu% _{0}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})<\infty,∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 , italic_R ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_exp ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_t end_ARG blackboard_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_E ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ) italic_d italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) < ∞ , (1.10)

and then we prove that this condition can indeed replace (1.9) in the stochastic setting, thus completing the proof. While the argument is specialised to equation (1.1), we believe that a similar condition can be proven more in general.

1.2. Further remarks

Remark 1.2.

In the proof of the condition (1.10), we follow a slightly different approach from the cited works [41, 45]. This allows us to prove that the estimate holds in the full non-singular regime s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0. When applied to the deterministic wave equation (1.8), this allows us to show the estimate (1.9), and thus quasi-invariance of μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in the regime s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0, thus improving the result in [45], which instead requires s>52𝑠52s>\frac{5}{2}italic_s > divide start_ARG 5 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG.

Remark 1.3.

In the deterministic case (1.8), it is in principle possible to write an explicit formula for the Radon-Nikodym derivative d(Φt)μsdμs𝑑subscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡subscript𝜇𝑠𝑑subscript𝜇𝑠\frac{d(\Phi_{t})_{\ast}\vec{\mu}_{s}}{d\vec{\mu}_{s}}divide start_ARG italic_d ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG. While this formula has not been used in the context of wave equations, for other deterministic models, it allowed to improve quasi-invariance results. See [13, 17, 19, 21, 22, 10, 31] for some examples. However, in the stochastic case, we do not have such an explicit formula for the density, as we cannot solve the Fokker-Plank equation (5.5) explicitly.

Remark 1.4.

A very recent result by Hairer-Kusuoka-Nagoji [29] shows the reverse of Theorem 1.1 for a wide class of parabolic equations, i.e. that under certain assumptions, the invariant measure for singular parabolic SPDEs is singular with respect to the law of the stationary linear solution. Interestingly, the main assumption of their result, i.e. the fact that ΦtΦtlinsubscriptΦ𝑡superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡lin\Phi_{t}-\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT does not belong to the Cameron-Martin space for μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu_{s}}over→ start_ARG italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG, also applies to equation (1.1). Nevertheless, the result of this paper shows that the measure is quasi-invariant. The discrepancy between these results is due to the following.

  • -

    The result in [29] heavily relies on the fact that the nonlinearity of the equation is not an Lloc1subscriptsuperscript𝐿1locL^{1}_{\text{loc}}italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT loc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT function when computed in the linear solution, and

  • -

    The dispersive/Hamiltonian structure of the wave equation introduces further cancellations that are not present in the parabolic case.

2. Preliminaries

Notations. For a function f:𝕋2[0,1]2:𝑓similar-tosuperscript𝕋2superscript012f:\mathbb{T}^{2}\sim[0,1]^{2}\to\mathbb{C}italic_f : blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ [ 0 , 1 ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → blackboard_C, its Fourier series is given by f^:2:^𝑓superscript2\widehat{f}:\mathbb{Z}^{2}\to\mathbb{C}over^ start_ARG italic_f end_ARG : blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → blackboard_C, where

f^(n):=𝕋2f(x)e2πinx𝑑xandf(x):=n2f^(n)e2πinx.formulae-sequenceassign^𝑓𝑛subscriptsuperscript𝕋2𝑓𝑥superscript𝑒2𝜋𝑖𝑛𝑥differential-d𝑥andassign𝑓𝑥subscript𝑛superscript2^𝑓𝑛superscript𝑒2𝜋𝑖𝑛𝑥\widehat{f}(n):=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}f(x)e^{-2\pi in\cdot x}dx\quad\text{and}% \quad f(x):=\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}}\widehat{f}(n)e^{2\pi in\cdot x}.over^ start_ARG italic_f end_ARG ( italic_n ) := ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f ( italic_x ) italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_π italic_i italic_n ⋅ italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x and italic_f ( italic_x ) := ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_f end_ARG ( italic_n ) italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_π italic_i italic_n ⋅ italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

Moreover, for a function F:2:𝐹superscript2F:\mathbb{C}^{2}\to\mathbb{C}italic_F : blackboard_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → blackboard_C, the expression F()u𝐹𝑢F(\nabla)uitalic_F ( ∇ ) italic_u will denote the distribution with Fourier coefficients given by

F()u^(n):=F(2πin)u^(n).assign^𝐹𝑢𝑛𝐹2𝜋𝑖𝑛^𝑢𝑛\widehat{F(\nabla)u}(n):=F(2\pi in)\widehat{u}(n).over^ start_ARG italic_F ( ∇ ) italic_u end_ARG ( italic_n ) := italic_F ( 2 italic_π italic_i italic_n ) over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG ( italic_n ) .

For x2𝑥superscript2x\in\mathbb{R}^{2}italic_x ∈ blackboard_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we denote x:=(1+|x|2)12assigndelimited-⟨⟩𝑥superscript1superscript𝑥212\langle x\rangle:=\big{(}1+|x|^{2}\big{)}^{\frac{1}{2}}⟨ italic_x ⟩ := ( 1 + | italic_x | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Given N0:={0}𝑁subscript0assign0N\in\mathbb{N}_{0}:=\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}italic_N ∈ blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := blackboard_N ∪ { 0 }, we define ΠNsubscriptΠabsent𝑁\Pi_{\leq N}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as the sharp projection onto frequencies in the square [N,N]2superscript𝑁𝑁2[-N,N]^{2}[ - italic_N , italic_N ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, that is,

ΠNu(x)=1(2π)2n2|n|Nu^(n)einx,subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢𝑥1superscript2𝜋2subscript𝑛superscript2subscript𝑛𝑁^𝑢𝑛superscript𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑥\displaystyle\Pi_{\leq N}u(x)=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2}}\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}n% \in\mathbb{Z}^{2}\\ |n|_{\infty}\leq N\end{subarray}}\widehat{u}(n)e^{in\cdot x},roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ( italic_x ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL | italic_n | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG ( italic_n ) italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i italic_n ⋅ italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

where for n=(n1,n2)𝑛subscript𝑛1subscript𝑛2n=(n_{1},n_{2})italic_n = ( italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), |n|:=maxj|nj|assignsubscript𝑛subscript𝑗subscript𝑛𝑗|n|_{\infty}:=\max_{j}|n_{j}|| italic_n | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := roman_max start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT |, and similarly, when 𝐮𝐮{\mathbf{u}}bold_u is vector valued,

ΠN𝐮(x)=(ΠNπ1𝐮(x),ΠNπ2𝐮(x)).subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝐮𝑥subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝜋1𝐮𝑥subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝜋2𝐮𝑥\displaystyle\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}(x)=(\Pi_{\leq N}\pi_{1}{\mathbf{u}}(x),% \Pi_{\leq N}\pi_{2}{\mathbf{u}}(x)).roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u ( italic_x ) = ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u ( italic_x ) , roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u ( italic_x ) ) .

We also define Π>N:=IdΠNassignsubscriptΠabsent𝑁IdsubscriptΠabsent𝑁\Pi_{>N}:=\text{Id}-\Pi_{\leq N}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := Id - roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and for N=1𝑁1N=-1italic_N = - 1, extend these projections to Π1=0subscriptΠabsent10\Pi_{\leq-1}=0roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and Π>1=IdsubscriptΠabsent1Id\Pi_{>-1}=\text{Id}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = Id. As ΠNsubscriptΠabsent𝑁\Pi_{\leq N}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Fourier restriction to a cube with sides of length 2N+12𝑁12N+12 italic_N + 1, we can rewrite ΠNsubscriptΠabsent𝑁\Pi_{\leq N}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as the composition of the Hilbert transform on each of the variables. Thus, from the boundedness of the Hilbert transform on Lp(𝕋)superscript𝐿𝑝𝕋L^{p}(\mathbb{T})italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T ) for 1<p<1𝑝1<p<\infty1 < italic_p < ∞, we obtain

ΠNuLp(𝕋2)uLp(𝕋2),less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢superscript𝐿𝑝superscript𝕋2subscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐿𝑝superscript𝕋2\|\Pi_{\leq N}u\|_{L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{2})}\lesssim\|u\|_{L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{2})},∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,

uniformly in the parameter N𝑁Nitalic_N and for 1<p<1𝑝1<p<\infty1 < italic_p < ∞. When N=+𝑁N=+\inftyitalic_N = + ∞, we set Π+:=IdassignsubscriptΠabsentId\Pi_{\leq+\infty}:=\text{Id}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ + ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := Id.

Given a vector 𝐮=(u,v)𝐮superscript𝑢𝑣top{\mathbf{u}}=(u,v)^{\top}bold_u = ( italic_u , italic_v ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊤ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we use π1subscript𝜋1\pi_{1}italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and π2subscript𝜋2\pi_{2}italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to denote the projection onto the first and second components of 𝐮𝐮{\mathbf{u}}bold_u, respectively. Namely, π1𝐮=usubscript𝜋1𝐮𝑢\pi_{1}{\mathbf{u}}=uitalic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u = italic_u and π2𝐮=vsubscript𝜋2𝐮𝑣\pi_{2}{\mathbf{u}}=vitalic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u = italic_v.

2.1. Function spaces

We define the Sobolev spaces Wα,psuperscript𝑊𝛼𝑝W^{\alpha,p}italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and 𝒲α,p:=Wα,p×Wα1,passignsuperscript𝒲𝛼𝑝superscript𝑊𝛼𝑝superscript𝑊𝛼1𝑝\mathcal{W}^{\alpha,p}:=W^{\alpha,p}\times W^{\alpha-1,p}caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - 1 , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT via the norms

uWα,p:=αuLpand𝐮𝒲α,pp:=αuLpp+α1vLpp,formulae-sequenceassignsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝑊𝛼𝑝subscriptnormsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝛼𝑢superscript𝐿𝑝andassignsuperscriptsubscriptnorm𝐮superscript𝒲𝛼𝑝𝑝superscriptsubscriptnormsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝛼𝑢superscript𝐿𝑝𝑝superscriptsubscriptnormsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝛼1𝑣superscript𝐿𝑝𝑝\displaystyle\|u\|_{W^{\alpha,p}}:=\|\langle\nabla\rangle^{\alpha}u\|_{L^{p}}% \quad\text{and}\quad\|{\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{W}^{\alpha,p}}^{p}:=\|\langle% \nabla\rangle^{\alpha}u\|_{L^{p}}^{p}+\|\langle\nabla\rangle^{\alpha-1}v\|_{L^% {p}}^{p},∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := ∥ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ∥ bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := ∥ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∥ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

with the usual modification when p=𝑝p=\inftyitalic_p = ∞. Moreover, when p=2𝑝2p=2italic_p = 2, we write α:=𝒲α,2assignsuperscript𝛼superscript𝒲𝛼2\mathcal{H}^{\alpha}:=\mathcal{W}^{\alpha,2}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α , 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. With this definition and (2.38), it holds that for every t𝑡t\in\mathbb{R}italic_t ∈ blackboard_R,

S(t)𝐮αet2𝐮α.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑆𝑡𝐮superscript𝛼superscript𝑒𝑡2subscriptnorm𝐮superscript𝛼\displaystyle\|S(t){\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{H}^{\alpha}}\lesssim e^{-\frac{t}{% 2}}\|{\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{H}^{\alpha}}.∥ italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.1)

Following [18], for 0<α<10𝛼10<\alpha<10 < italic_α < 1, we define the space

X¯α:={𝐮α:S(t)𝐮C([0,+);𝒲α,2α),S(t)𝐮𝒲α,2αet8},assignsuperscript¯𝑋𝛼conditional-set𝐮superscript𝛼formulae-sequence𝑆𝑡𝐮𝐶0superscript𝒲𝛼2𝛼less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑆𝑡𝐮superscript𝒲𝛼2𝛼superscript𝑒𝑡8\displaystyle\overline{X}^{\alpha}:=\{{\mathbf{u}}\in\mathcal{H}^{\alpha}\,:\,% S(t){\mathbf{u}}\in C([0,+\infty);\mathcal{W}^{\alpha,\frac{2}{\alpha}}),\,\|S% (t){\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{W}^{\alpha,\frac{2}{\alpha}}}\lesssim e^{-\frac{t}% {8}}\},over¯ start_ARG italic_X end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := { bold_u ∈ caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u ∈ italic_C ( [ 0 , + ∞ ) ; caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α , divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_α end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , ∥ italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α , divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_α end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG 8 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ,

with the norm

𝐮Xα:=supt0et8S(t)𝐮𝒲α,2α.assignsubscriptnorm𝐮superscript𝑋𝛼subscriptsupremum𝑡0superscript𝑒𝑡8subscriptnorm𝑆𝑡𝐮superscript𝒲𝛼2𝛼\displaystyle\|{\mathbf{u}}\|_{X^{\alpha}}:=\sup_{t\geq 0}\,e^{\frac{t}{8}}\|S% (t){\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{W}^{\alpha,\frac{2}{\alpha}}}.∥ bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ≥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG 8 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α , divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_α end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.2)

We define Xαsuperscript𝑋𝛼X^{\alpha}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to be the closure of trigonometric polynomials in X¯αsuperscript¯𝑋𝛼\overline{X}^{\alpha}over¯ start_ARG italic_X end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT under the norm Xα\|\cdot\|_{X^{\alpha}}∥ ⋅ ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which makes (Xα,Xα)(X^{\alpha},\|\cdot\|_{X^{\alpha}})( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , ∥ ⋅ ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) into a Polish space. Note that for any t0𝑡0t\geq 0italic_t ≥ 0,

S(t)XαXαet8.subscriptnorm𝑆𝑡maps-tosuperscript𝑋𝛼superscript𝑋𝛼superscript𝑒𝑡8\displaystyle\|S(t)\|_{X^{\alpha}\mapsto X^{\alpha}}\leq e^{-\frac{t}{8}}.∥ italic_S ( italic_t ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↦ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG 8 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (2.3)

Moreover the following embeddings hold (see [18]):

1Xα𝒲0,6.superscript1superscript𝑋𝛼superscript𝒲06\displaystyle\mathcal{H}^{1}\hookrightarrow X^{\alpha}\hookrightarrow\mathcal{% W}^{0,6}.caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↪ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↪ caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 , 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

When α1𝛼1\alpha\geq 1italic_α ≥ 1, we simply define Xα:=αassignsuperscript𝑋𝛼superscript𝛼X^{\alpha}:=\mathcal{H}^{\alpha}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and, when α>1𝛼1\alpha>1italic_α > 1, the embedding αLsuperscript𝛼superscript𝐿\mathcal{H}^{\alpha}\hookrightarrow L^{\infty}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↪ italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT implies that Xαsuperscript𝑋𝛼X^{\alpha}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is an algebra.

Similar to the spaces X¯αsuperscript¯𝑋𝛼\overline{X}^{\alpha}over¯ start_ARG italic_X end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and Xαsuperscript𝑋𝛼X^{\alpha}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, given α>0𝛼0\alpha>0italic_α > 0, we let

Z¯α:={𝐮α:S(t)𝐮C([0,+);𝒞α),S(t)𝐮𝒞αet8},assignsuperscript¯𝑍𝛼conditional-set𝐮superscript𝛼formulae-sequence𝑆𝑡𝐮𝐶0superscript𝒞𝛼less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑆𝑡𝐮superscript𝒞𝛼superscript𝑒𝑡8\displaystyle\overline{Z}^{\alpha}:=\{{\mathbf{u}}\in\mathcal{H}^{\alpha}\,:\,% S(t){\mathbf{u}}\in C([0,+\infty);\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}),\,\,\|S(t){\mathbf{u}}% \|_{\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}}\lesssim e^{-\frac{t}{8}}\,\},over¯ start_ARG italic_Z end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := { bold_u ∈ caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u ∈ italic_C ( [ 0 , + ∞ ) ; caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , ∥ italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG 8 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ,

and define Zαsuperscript𝑍𝛼Z^{\alpha}italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to be the closure of trigonometric polynomials in Z¯αsuperscript¯𝑍𝛼\overline{Z}^{\alpha}over¯ start_ARG italic_Z end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT under the norm

𝐮Zα=supt0et8S(t)𝐮𝒞α.subscriptnorm𝐮superscript𝑍𝛼subscriptsupremum𝑡0superscript𝑒𝑡8subscriptnorm𝑆𝑡𝐮superscript𝒞𝛼\displaystyle\|{\mathbf{u}}\|_{Z^{\alpha}}=\sup_{t\geq 0}e^{\frac{t}{8}}\|S(t)% {\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}}.∥ bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ≥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG 8 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.4)

Now, (Zα,Zα)(Z^{\alpha},\|\cdot\|_{Z^{\alpha}})( italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , ∥ ⋅ ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is a Polish space (see [51, Lemma 1.2]) and ZαXαsuperscript𝑍𝛼superscript𝑋𝛼Z^{\alpha}\hookrightarrow X^{\alpha}italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↪ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

We define Littlewood-Payley projections as follows. Let ϕ:[0,1]:italic-ϕ01\phi:\mathbb{R}\to[0,1]italic_ϕ : blackboard_R → [ 0 , 1 ] be a smooth bump function supported on [85,85]8585[-\frac{8}{5},\frac{8}{5}][ - divide start_ARG 8 end_ARG start_ARG 5 end_ARG , divide start_ARG 8 end_ARG start_ARG 5 end_ARG ] and ϕ=1italic-ϕ1\phi=1italic_ϕ = 1 on [54,54]5454[-\frac{5}{4},\frac{5}{4}][ - divide start_ARG 5 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG , divide start_ARG 5 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG ]. For ξ2𝜉superscript2\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{2}italic_ξ ∈ blackboard_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we set ϕ0(ξ):=ϕ(|ξ|)assignsubscriptitalic-ϕ0𝜉italic-ϕ𝜉\phi_{0}(\xi):=\phi(|\xi|)italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) := italic_ϕ ( | italic_ξ | ) and ϕj(ξ)=ϕ0(2jξ)ϕ0(2j+1ξ)subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑗𝜉subscriptitalic-ϕ0superscript2𝑗𝜉subscriptitalic-ϕ0superscript2𝑗1𝜉\phi_{j}(\xi)=\phi_{0}(2^{-j}\xi)-\phi_{0}(2^{-j+1}\xi)italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) = italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ ) - italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ ) for j𝑗j\in\mathbb{N}italic_j ∈ blackboard_N. For j0𝑗subscript0j\in\mathbb{N}_{0}italic_j ∈ blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we define the Littlewood-Payley projector PNsubscript𝑃𝑁P_{N}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as the Fourier multiplier operator with symbol

φN(ξ)=ϕN(ξ)0ϕ(ξ),subscript𝜑𝑁𝜉subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑁𝜉subscriptsubscript0subscriptitalic-ϕ𝜉\displaystyle\varphi_{N}(\xi)=\frac{\phi_{N}(\xi)}{\sum_{\ell\in\mathbb{N}_{0}% }\phi_{\ell}(\xi)},italic_φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) = divide start_ARG italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) end_ARG start_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ ∈ blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) end_ARG ,

where N:=2jassign𝑁superscript2𝑗N:=2^{j}italic_N := 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This gives a decomposition of a distribution

f=N20PNf.𝑓subscript𝑁superscript2subscript0subscript𝑃𝑁𝑓f=\sum_{N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}}P_{N}f.italic_f = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f .

We recall the definition of the Besov spaces Bp,qα(𝕋2)subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝛼𝑝𝑞superscript𝕋2B^{\alpha}_{p,q}(\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) which are defined by norm:

uBp,qα=NαPNuLxpNq.subscriptnorm𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝛼𝑝𝑞evaluated-atevaluated-atnormsuperscript𝑁𝛼subscript𝑃𝑁𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐿𝑝𝑥subscriptsuperscript𝑞𝑁\displaystyle\|u\|_{B^{\alpha}_{p,q}}=\big{\|}N^{\alpha}\|P_{N}u\|_{L^{p}_{x}}% \big{\|}_{\ell^{q}_{N}}.∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∥ italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.5)

We have B2,2α=Hαsubscriptsuperscript𝐵𝛼22superscript𝐻𝛼B^{\alpha}_{2,2}=H^{\alpha}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for any α𝛼\alpha\in\mathbb{R}italic_α ∈ blackboard_R, and we define the Besov-Hölder spaces Cα:=B,αassignsuperscript𝐶𝛼subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝛼C^{\alpha}:=B^{\alpha}_{\infty,\infty}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ , ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We also define vector versions of these spaces as 𝒞α:=Cα×Cα1assignsuperscript𝒞𝛼superscript𝐶𝛼superscript𝐶𝛼1\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}:=C^{\alpha}\times C^{\alpha-1}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with the norm

𝐮𝒞α=π1𝐮Cα+π2𝐮Cα1.subscriptnorm𝐮superscript𝒞𝛼subscriptnormsubscript𝜋1𝐮superscript𝐶𝛼subscriptnormsubscript𝜋2𝐮superscript𝐶𝛼1\displaystyle\|{\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}}=\|\pi_{1}{\mathbf{u}}\|_{% C^{\alpha}}+\|\pi_{2}{\mathbf{u}}\|_{C^{\alpha-1}}.∥ bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∥ italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

The Besov spaces have the following properties. See for instance [3].

Lemma 2.1.

The following estimates hold.
(i) (interpolation) For 0<s1<s20subscript𝑠1subscript𝑠20<s_{1}<s_{2}0 < italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and θ=s1s2𝜃subscript𝑠1subscript𝑠2\theta=\frac{s_{1}}{s_{2}}italic_θ = divide start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG, it holds that

uHs1uHs2θuL21θ.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐻subscript𝑠1superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐻subscript𝑠2𝜃superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐿21𝜃\displaystyle\|u\|_{H^{s_{1}}}\lesssim\|u\|_{H^{s_{2}}}^{\theta}\|u\|_{L^{2}}^% {1-\theta}.∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 - italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (2.6)

(ii) (embeddings) Let s1,s2subscript𝑠1subscript𝑠2s_{1},s_{2}\in\mathbb{R}italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ blackboard_R and p1,p2,q1,q2[1,]subscript𝑝1subscript𝑝2subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞21p_{1},p_{2},q_{1},q_{2}\in[1,\infty]italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ [ 1 , ∞ ]. Then,

uBp1,q1s1uBp2,q2s2fors1s2,p1p2,andq1q2,uBp1,q1s1uBp1,s2fors1<s2,uBp1,0uLp1uBp1,10.formulae-sequenceless-than-or-similar-tosubscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠1subscript𝑝1subscript𝑞1subscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠2subscript𝑝2subscript𝑞2formulae-sequenceforsubscript𝑠1subscript𝑠2formulae-sequencesubscript𝑝1subscript𝑝2formulae-sequenceandsubscript𝑞1subscript𝑞2formulae-sequenceless-than-or-similar-tosubscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠1subscript𝑝1subscript𝑞1subscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠2subscript𝑝1formulae-sequenceforsubscript𝑠1subscript𝑠2less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵0subscript𝑝1subscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑢superscript𝐿subscript𝑝1less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptdelimited-∥∥𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵0subscript𝑝11\displaystyle\begin{split}\|u\|_{B^{s_{1}}_{p_{1},q_{1}}}&\lesssim\|u\|_{B^{s_% {2}}_{p_{2},q_{2}}}\quad\text{for}\,\,s_{1}\leq s_{2},p_{1}\leq p_{2},\,\,% \text{and}\,\,q_{1}\geq q_{2},\\ \|u\|_{B^{s_{1}}_{p_{1},q_{1}}}&\lesssim\|u\|_{B^{s_{2}}_{p_{1},\infty}}\quad% \text{for}\,\,s_{1}<s_{2},\\ \|u\|_{B^{0}_{p_{1},\infty}}&\lesssim\|u\|_{L^{p_{1}}}\lesssim\|u\|_{B^{0}_{p_% {1},1}}.\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , and italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≥ italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . end_CELL end_ROW (2.7)

(iii) (algebra property) For any σ>0𝜎0\sigma>0italic_σ > 0,

uvCσuCσvCσ.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑢𝑣superscript𝐶𝜎subscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐶𝜎subscriptnorm𝑣superscript𝐶𝜎\displaystyle\|uv\|_{C^{\sigma}}\lesssim\|u\|_{C^{\sigma}}\|v\|_{C^{\sigma}}.∥ italic_u italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.8)

(iv) (duality) Let σ𝜎\sigma\in\mathbb{R}italic_σ ∈ blackboard_R and p,p,q,q[1,]𝑝superscript𝑝𝑞superscript𝑞1p,p^{\prime},q,q^{\prime}\in[1,\infty]italic_p , italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_q , italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ [ 1 , ∞ ] such that 1p+1p=1q+1q=11𝑝1superscript𝑝1𝑞1superscript𝑞1\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p^{\prime}}=\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{q^{\prime}}=1divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_q end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = 1. Then,

|𝕋2uv𝑑x|uBp,qσvBp,qσ.subscriptsuperscript𝕋2𝑢𝑣differential-d𝑥subscriptnorm𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝜎𝑝𝑞subscriptnorm𝑣subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝜎superscript𝑝superscript𝑞\displaystyle\bigg{|}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}uvdx\bigg{|}\leq\|u\|_{B^{\sigma}_{p% ,q}}\|v\|_{B^{-\sigma}_{p^{\prime},q^{\prime}}}.| ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_v italic_d italic_x | ≤ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.9)

(iv) (fractional Leibniz rule) Let p,p1,p2,p3,p4[1,]𝑝subscript𝑝1subscript𝑝2subscript𝑝3subscript𝑝41p,p_{1},p_{2},p_{3},p_{4}\in[1,\infty]italic_p , italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ [ 1 , ∞ ] such that 1p1+1p2=1p3+1p4=1p1subscript𝑝11subscript𝑝21subscript𝑝31subscript𝑝41𝑝\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{2}}=\frac{1}{p_{3}}+\frac{1}{p_{4}}=\frac{1}{p}divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG. Then, for all σ>0𝜎0\sigma>0italic_σ > 0, we have

uvBp,qσuBp1,qσvLp2+uLp3vBp4,qσ.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑢𝑣subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝜎𝑝𝑞subscriptnorm𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝜎subscript𝑝1𝑞subscriptnorm𝑣superscript𝐿subscript𝑝2subscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐿subscript𝑝3subscriptnorm𝑣subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝜎subscript𝑝4𝑞\displaystyle\|uv\|_{B^{\sigma}_{p,q}}\lesssim\|u\|_{B^{\sigma}_{p_{1},q}}\|v% \|_{L^{p_{2}}}+\|u\|_{L^{p_{3}}}\|v\|_{B^{\sigma}_{p_{4},q}}.∥ italic_u italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_v ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.10)

(iv) (Sobolev embedding) Let 1p2p11subscript𝑝2subscript𝑝11\leq p_{2}\leq p_{1}\leq\infty1 ≤ italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ ∞, q[1,]𝑞1q\in[1,\infty]italic_q ∈ [ 1 , ∞ ], and s2s1+2(1p21p1)subscript𝑠2subscript𝑠121subscript𝑝21subscript𝑝1s_{2}\geq s_{1}+2(\frac{1}{p_{2}}-\frac{1}{p_{1}})italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≥ italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 2 ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ). Then,

uBp1,qs1uBp2,qs2.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠1subscript𝑝1𝑞subscriptnorm𝑢subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠2subscript𝑝2𝑞\displaystyle\|u\|_{B^{s_{1}}_{p_{1},q}}\lesssim\|u\|_{B^{s_{2}}_{p_{2},q}}.∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.11)

Given two functions f𝑓fitalic_f and g𝑔gitalic_g on 𝕋2superscript𝕋2\mathbb{T}^{2}blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we can expand the product fg𝑓𝑔fgitalic_f italic_g as

fg𝑓𝑔\displaystyle fgitalic_f italic_g =f\scaleobj0.7<g+f\scaleobj0.7=g+f\scaleobj0.7>absent\scaleobj0.7𝑓𝑔\scaleobj0.7𝑓𝑔limit-from𝑓\scaleobj0.7\displaystyle\hskip 0.85358pt=f\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9% pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to% 0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{% 0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill% {0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}g+f\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to% 8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt% \hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}% {}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}\pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34% 723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4% .25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723% pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.347% 23pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.28406pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor% }{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$=$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}g+f\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to% 8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt% \hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}% {}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}\pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34% 723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4% .25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723% pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.347% 23pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$>$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}= italic_f start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP italic_g + italic_f start_BINOP 0.7 = end_BINOP italic_g + italic_f start_BINOP 0.7 > end_BINOP
:=N<12MPNfPMg+12MN2MPNfPMg+M<12NPNfPMg.assignabsentsubscript𝑁12𝑀subscript𝑃𝑁𝑓subscript𝑃𝑀𝑔subscript12𝑀𝑁2𝑀subscript𝑃𝑁𝑓subscript𝑃𝑀𝑔subscript𝑀12𝑁subscript𝑃𝑁𝑓subscript𝑃𝑀𝑔\displaystyle:=\sum_{N<\frac{1}{2}M}P_{N}f\,P_{M}g+\sum_{\frac{1}{2}M\leq N% \leq 2M}P_{N}f\,P_{M}g+\sum_{M<\frac{1}{2}N}P_{N}f\,P_{M}g.:= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_M ≤ italic_N ≤ 2 italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g . (2.12)

We will use the shorthand NMmuch-less-than𝑁𝑀N\ll Mitalic_N ≪ italic_M for N<12M𝑁12𝑀N<\frac{1}{2}Mitalic_N < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_M and NMsimilar-to𝑁𝑀N\sim Mitalic_N ∼ italic_M for 12MN2M12𝑀𝑁2𝑀\frac{1}{2}M\leq N\leq 2Mdivide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_M ≤ italic_N ≤ 2 italic_M.

Lemma 2.2.

Let s1,s2subscript𝑠1subscript𝑠2s_{1},s_{2}\in\mathbb{R}italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ blackboard_R and 1p,p1,p2,qformulae-sequence1𝑝subscript𝑝1subscript𝑝2𝑞1\leq p,p_{1},p_{2},q\leq\infty1 ≤ italic_p , italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q ≤ ∞ such that 1p=1p1+1p21𝑝1subscript𝑝11subscript𝑝2\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{2}}divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG. Then, we have

f\scaleobj0.7<gBp,qs2fLp1gBp2,qs2.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm\scaleobj0.7𝑓𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠2𝑝𝑞subscriptnorm𝑓superscript𝐿subscript𝑝1subscriptnorm𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠2subscript𝑝2𝑞\displaystyle\|f\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt% {\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}% \pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}% {0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}g\|_{B^{s_{2}}_{p,q}}\lesssim\|f\|_{L^{p_{1% }}}\|g\|_{B^{s_{2}}_{p_{2},q}}.∥ italic_f start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.13)

When s1<0subscript𝑠10s_{1}<0italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 0, we have

f\scaleobj0.7<gBp,qs1+s2fBp1,qs1gBp2,qs2.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm\scaleobj0.7𝑓𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠1subscript𝑠2𝑝𝑞subscriptnorm𝑓subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠1subscript𝑝1𝑞subscriptnorm𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠2subscript𝑝2𝑞\displaystyle\|f\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt% {\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}% \pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}% {0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}g\|_{B^{s_{1}+s_{2}}_{p,q}}\lesssim\|f\|_{B% ^{s_{1}}_{p_{1},q}}\|g\|_{B^{s_{2}}_{p_{2},q}}.∥ italic_f start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.14)

When s1+s2>0subscript𝑠1subscript𝑠20s_{1}+s_{2}>0italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0, we have

f\scaleobj0.7=gBp,qs1+s2fBp1,qs1gBp2,qs2.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm\scaleobj0.7𝑓𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠1subscript𝑠2𝑝𝑞subscriptnorm𝑓subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠1subscript𝑝1𝑞subscriptnorm𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠2subscript𝑝2𝑞\displaystyle\|f\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt% {\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}% \pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}% {0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.28406pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor% }{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$=$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}g\|_{B^{s_{1}+s_{2}}_{p,q}}\lesssim\|f\|_{B% ^{s_{1}}_{p_{1},q}}\|g\|_{B^{s_{2}}_{p_{2},q}}.∥ italic_f start_BINOP 0.7 = end_BINOP italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.15)

In particular, if s1<0<s2subscript𝑠10subscript𝑠2s_{1}<0<s_{2}italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 0 < italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and s1+s2>0subscript𝑠1subscript𝑠20s_{1}+s_{2}>0italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0, the mapping (f,g)fg𝑓𝑔𝑓𝑔(f,g)\to fg( italic_f , italic_g ) → italic_f italic_g extends to a continuous bilinear map from Bp1,qs1×Bp2,qs2subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠1subscript𝑝1𝑞subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠2subscript𝑝2𝑞B^{s_{1}}_{p_{1},q}\times B^{s_{2}}_{p_{2},q}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to Bp,qs1+s2subscriptsuperscript𝐵subscript𝑠1subscript𝑠2𝑝𝑞B^{s_{1}+s_{2}}_{p,q}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

See [3] for proofs in the non-periodic case. We then have some useful consequences.

Lemma 2.3.

Let 0<α<s0𝛼𝑠0<\alpha<s0 < italic_α < italic_s and 0<δ<2(1s+α)0𝛿21𝑠𝛼0<\delta<2(1-s+\alpha)0 < italic_δ < 2 ( 1 - italic_s + italic_α ). Then,

fgHsfHs+αgCsα+δ,less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑓𝑔superscript𝐻𝑠subscriptnorm𝑓superscript𝐻𝑠𝛼subscriptnorm𝑔superscript𝐶𝑠𝛼𝛿\displaystyle\|fg\|_{H^{-s}}\lesssim\|f\|_{H^{-s+\alpha}}\|g\|_{C^{s-\alpha+% \delta}},∥ italic_f italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_α + italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (2.16)
fgHs+αfHsα+δgCs+α.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑓𝑔superscript𝐻𝑠𝛼subscriptnorm𝑓superscript𝐻𝑠𝛼𝛿subscriptnorm𝑔superscript𝐶𝑠𝛼\displaystyle\|fg\|_{H^{-s+\alpha}}\lesssim\|f\|_{H^{s-\alpha+\delta}}\|g\|_{C% ^{-s+\alpha}}.∥ italic_f italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_α + italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.17)
Proof.

First assume that 0<s<10𝑠10<s<10 < italic_s < 1 and consider (2.16). Let p=21+s+12δ𝑝21𝑠12𝛿p=\frac{2}{1+s+\frac{1}{2}\delta}italic_p = divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_s + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_δ end_ARG with 0<12δ<1s012𝛿1𝑠0<\frac{1}{2}\delta<1-s0 < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_δ < 1 - italic_s sufficiently small so that p>1𝑝1p>1italic_p > 1. By Sobolev embedding and Lemma 2.2, we have

fgHsfgBp,212δfHs+αgB,2sα+12δfHs+αgCsα+δ.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑓𝑔superscript𝐻𝑠subscriptnorm𝑓𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐵12𝛿𝑝2less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑓superscript𝐻𝑠𝛼subscriptnorm𝑔superscriptsubscript𝐵2𝑠𝛼12𝛿less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑓superscript𝐻𝑠𝛼subscriptnorm𝑔superscript𝐶𝑠𝛼𝛿\displaystyle\|fg\|_{H^{-s}}\lesssim\|fg\|_{B^{\frac{1}{2}\delta}_{p,2}}% \lesssim\|f\|_{H^{-s+\alpha}}\|g\|_{B_{\infty,2}^{s-\alpha+\frac{1}{2}\delta}}% \lesssim\|f\|_{H^{-s+\alpha}}\|g\|_{C^{s-\alpha+\delta}}.∥ italic_f italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_α + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_α + italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.18)

For (2.17), with p=21+12δ+sα𝑝2112𝛿𝑠𝛼p=\frac{2}{1+\frac{1}{2}\delta+s-\alpha}italic_p = divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_δ + italic_s - italic_α end_ARG and 0<δ<2(1s+α)0𝛿21𝑠𝛼0<\delta<2(1-s+\alpha)0 < italic_δ < 2 ( 1 - italic_s + italic_α ), when 0<s<10𝑠10<s<10 < italic_s < 1:

fgHs+αfgBp,212δfHsα+δgB,2s+α12δfHsα+δgCs+α.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑓𝑔superscript𝐻𝑠𝛼subscriptnorm𝑓𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐵12𝛿𝑝2less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑓superscript𝐻𝑠𝛼𝛿subscriptnorm𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝑠𝛼12𝛿2less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑓superscript𝐻𝑠𝛼𝛿subscriptnorm𝑔superscript𝐶𝑠𝛼\displaystyle\|fg\|_{H^{-s+\alpha}}\lesssim\|fg\|_{B^{\frac{1}{2}\delta}_{p,2}% }\lesssim\|f\|_{H^{s-\alpha+\delta}}\|g\|_{B^{-s+\alpha-\frac{1}{2}\delta}_{% \infty,2}}\lesssim\|f\|_{H^{s-\alpha+\delta}}\|g\|_{C^{-s+\alpha}}.∥ italic_f italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_α + italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s + italic_α - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_α + italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

If s1𝑠1s\geq 1italic_s ≥ 1, then we instead first use the embedding B1,212δHssubscriptsuperscript𝐵12𝛿12superscript𝐻𝑠B^{\frac{1}{2}\delta}_{1,2}\subset H^{-s}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊂ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for both (2.16) and (2.17). ∎

2.2. A commutator estimate

Our main goal in this subsection is to give a proof of the following commutator estimate.

Proposition 2.4.

For any s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0 and 0<ε<14min(s,1)0𝜀14𝑠10<\varepsilon<\frac{1}{4}\min(s,1)0 < italic_ε < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG roman_min ( italic_s , 1 ), it holds that

s(u3)3u2suL2(𝕋2)uCsε(𝕋2)3.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnormsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠superscript𝑢33superscript𝑢2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝑢superscript𝐿2superscript𝕋2superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐶𝑠𝜀superscript𝕋23\displaystyle\|\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}(u^{3})-3u^{2}\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}u% \|_{L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{2})}\lesssim\|u\|_{C^{s-\varepsilon}(\mathbb{T}^{2})}^{3}.∥ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - 3 italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (2.19)

Whilst the estimate (2.19) is far from optimal, it will be sufficient for our purposes as we only require the regularities on the right-hand side of (2.19) to be strictly less than s𝑠sitalic_s. We need two preliminary results before we can give a proof of (2.19).

Lemma 2.5.

For any s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0 and 0<ε<12s0𝜀12𝑠0<\varepsilon<\frac{1}{2}s0 < italic_ε < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_s, it holds that

u33(u2\scaleobj0.7<u)Hs(𝕋2)uCsε(𝕋2)3.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnormsuperscript𝑢33\scaleobj0.7superscript𝑢2𝑢superscript𝐻𝑠superscript𝕋2superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐶𝑠𝜀superscript𝕋23\displaystyle\|u^{3}-3(u^{2}\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{% \vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to% 0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{% 0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill% {0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}u)\|_{H^{s}(\mathbb{T}^{2})}\lesssim\|u\|_{% C^{s-\varepsilon}(\mathbb{T}^{2})}^{3}.∥ italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP italic_u ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (2.20)
Proof.

We have

u3=N{(P2Nu)3(PNu)3}=NPNu[(P2Nu)2+(P2Nu)(PNu)+(PNu)2],superscript𝑢3subscript𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑃absent2𝑁𝑢3superscriptsubscript𝑃absent𝑁𝑢3subscript𝑁subscript𝑃𝑁𝑢delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑃absent2𝑁𝑢2subscript𝑃absent2𝑁𝑢subscript𝑃absent𝑁𝑢superscriptsubscript𝑃absent𝑁𝑢2\displaystyle u^{3}=\sum_{N}\big{\{}(P_{\leq 2N}u)^{3}-(P_{\leq N}u)^{3}\big{% \}}=\sum_{N}P_{N}u\big{[}(P_{\leq 2N}u)^{2}+(P_{\leq 2N}u)(P_{\leq N}u)+(P_{% \leq N}u)^{2}\big{]},italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u [ ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) + ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ,

so that

u33(u2\scaleobj0.7<u)superscript𝑢33\scaleobj0.7superscript𝑢2𝑢\displaystyle u^{3}-3(u^{2}\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{% \vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to% 0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{% 0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill% {0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}u)italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP italic_u ) =NPNu[(P2Nu)2P12N(u2)]absentsubscript𝑁subscript𝑃𝑁𝑢delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑃absent2𝑁𝑢2subscript𝑃absent12𝑁superscript𝑢2\displaystyle=\sum_{N}P_{N}u\big{[}(P_{\leq 2N}u)^{2}-P_{\leq\frac{1}{2}N}(u^{% 2})\big{]}= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u [ ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] (2.21)
+NPNu[P2NuPNuP12N(u2)]subscript𝑁subscript𝑃𝑁𝑢delimited-[]subscript𝑃absent2𝑁𝑢subscript𝑃absent𝑁𝑢subscript𝑃absent12𝑁superscript𝑢2\displaystyle\hphantom{XX}+\sum_{N}P_{N}u\big{[}P_{\leq 2N}u\cdot P_{\leq N}u-% P_{\leq\frac{1}{2}N}(u^{2})\big{]}+ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u [ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u - italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] (2.22)
+NPNu[(PNu)2P12N(u2)].subscript𝑁subscript𝑃𝑁𝑢delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑃absent𝑁𝑢2subscript𝑃absent12𝑁superscript𝑢2\displaystyle\hphantom{XX}+\sum_{N}P_{N}u\big{[}(P_{\leq N}u)^{2}-P_{\leq\frac% {1}{2}N}(u^{2})\big{]}.+ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u [ ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] . (2.23)

We provide details only for estimating (2.21) as the (2.22) and (2.23) follow from similar ideas exploiting the existence of at least two similar and large frequencies. We write

(P2Nu)2P12N(u2)=N1,N2P>12N[P2NPN1uP2NPN2u]+P12N[P2NPN1uP2NPN2uPN1uPN2u].superscriptsubscript𝑃absent2𝑁𝑢2subscript𝑃absent12𝑁superscript𝑢2subscriptsubscript𝑁1subscript𝑁2subscript𝑃absent12𝑁delimited-[]subscript𝑃absent2𝑁subscript𝑃subscript𝑁1𝑢subscript𝑃absent2𝑁subscript𝑃subscript𝑁2𝑢subscript𝑃absent12𝑁delimited-[]subscript𝑃absent2𝑁subscript𝑃subscript𝑁1𝑢subscript𝑃absent2𝑁subscript𝑃subscript𝑁2𝑢subscript𝑃subscript𝑁1𝑢subscript𝑃subscript𝑁2𝑢\displaystyle\begin{split}(P_{\leq 2N}u)^{2}-P_{\leq\frac{1}{2}N}(u^{2})&=\sum% _{N_{1},N_{2}}P_{>\frac{1}{2}N}[P_{\leq 2N}P_{N_{1}}u\cdot P_{\leq 2N}P_{N_{2}% }u]\\ &\hphantom{XXXX}+P_{\leq\frac{1}{2}N}\big{[}P_{\leq 2N}P_{N_{1}}u\cdot P_{\leq 2% N}P_{N_{2}}u-P_{N_{1}}u\cdot P_{N_{2}}u\big{]}.\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_CELL start_CELL = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ] end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL + italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u - italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ] . end_CELL end_ROW (2.24)

Let M20𝑀superscript2subscript0M\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_M ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. For the first piece on the right-hand side of (2.24), we have

N,N1,N2PM[PNuP>12N[P2NPN1uP2NPN2u]]L2N,N1,N2N1NMPNuP>12N[P2NPN1uP2NPN2u]]L2N,N1,N2N1NMPNuLPN1uL2PN2uL(N,N1,N2N1NM(NN1N2)(sε))uCsε3M2(sε)uCsε3.\displaystyle\begin{split}\bigg{\|}\sum_{N,N_{1},N_{2}}&P_{M}\big{[}P_{N}u% \cdot P_{>\frac{1}{2}N}[P_{\leq 2N}P_{N_{1}}u\cdot P_{\leq 2N}P_{N_{2}}u]\big{% ]}\bigg{\|}_{L^{2}}\\ &\lesssim\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}N,N_{1},N_{2}\\ N_{1}\sim N\gtrsim M\end{subarray}}\|P_{N}u\cdot P_{>\frac{1}{2}N}[P_{\leq 2N}% P_{N_{1}}u\cdot P_{\leq 2N}P_{N_{2}}u]\big{]}\|_{L^{2}}\\ &\lesssim\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}N,N_{1},N_{2}\\ N_{1}\sim N\gtrsim M\end{subarray}}\|P_{N}u\|_{L^{\infty}}\|P_{N_{1}}u\|_{L^{2% }}\|P_{N_{2}}u\|_{L^{\infty}}\\ &\lesssim\bigg{(}\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}N,N_{1},N_{2}\\ N_{1}\sim N\gtrsim M\end{subarray}}(NN_{1}N_{2})^{-(s-\varepsilon)}\bigg{)}\|u% \|^{3}_{C^{s-\varepsilon}}\\ &\lesssim M^{-2(s-\varepsilon)}\|u\|^{3}_{C^{s-\varepsilon}}.\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ∥ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ] ] ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≲ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_N , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_N ≳ italic_M end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ] ] ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≲ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_N , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_N ≳ italic_M end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≲ ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_N , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_N ≳ italic_M end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_N italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_s - italic_ε ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≲ italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 ( italic_s - italic_ε ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . end_CELL end_ROW (2.25)

Using the characterisation

fHs2MM2sPMfL22,similar-tosuperscriptsubscriptnorm𝑓superscript𝐻𝑠2subscript𝑀superscript𝑀2𝑠superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝑃𝑀𝑓superscript𝐿22\displaystyle\|f\|_{H^{s}}^{2}\sim\sum_{M}M^{2s}\|P_{M}f\|_{L^{2}}^{2},∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

we see that this contribution is controlled provided that 2s4(sε)<02𝑠4𝑠𝜀02s-4(s-\varepsilon)<02 italic_s - 4 ( italic_s - italic_ε ) < 0, enforcing ε<12s𝜀12𝑠\varepsilon<\frac{1}{2}sitalic_ε < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_s. For the second piece on the right hand side of (2.24), we further write it as

P12Nsubscript𝑃absent12𝑁\displaystyle P_{\leq\frac{1}{2}N}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [P2NPN1uP2NPN2uPN1uPN2u]delimited-[]subscript𝑃absent2𝑁subscript𝑃subscript𝑁1𝑢subscript𝑃absent2𝑁subscript𝑃subscript𝑁2𝑢subscript𝑃subscript𝑁1𝑢subscript𝑃subscript𝑁2𝑢\displaystyle\big{[}P_{\leq 2N}P_{N_{1}}u\cdot P_{\leq 2N}P_{N_{2}}u-P_{N_{1}}% u\cdot P_{N_{2}}u\big{]}[ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u - italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ]
=P12N[P2NPN1uP>2NPN2u(P>2NPN1u)(PN2u)]absentsubscript𝑃absent12𝑁delimited-[]subscript𝑃absent2𝑁subscript𝑃subscript𝑁1𝑢subscript𝑃absent2𝑁subscript𝑃subscript𝑁2𝑢subscript𝑃absent2𝑁subscript𝑃subscript𝑁1𝑢subscript𝑃subscript𝑁2𝑢\displaystyle=P_{\leq\frac{1}{2}N}\big{[}P_{\leq 2N}P_{N_{1}}u\cdot P_{>2N}P_{% N_{2}}u-(P_{>2N}P_{N_{1}}u)(P_{N_{2}}u)\big{]}= italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ⋅ italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u - ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 2 italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) ( italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) ]

Again, we have at least that max(N1,N2)Ngreater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑁1subscript𝑁2𝑁\max(N_{1},N_{2})\gtrsim Nroman_max ( italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ≳ italic_N in each of these terms, and we can proceed similar to (2.25) provided that ε<12s𝜀12𝑠\varepsilon<\frac{1}{2}sitalic_ε < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_s. This completes the proof. ∎

Lemma 2.6.

Given s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0 and 0<ε<12s0𝜀12𝑠0<\varepsilon<\frac{1}{2}s0 < italic_ε < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_s, there exists a multilinear operator R𝑅Ritalic_R such that

||s(f\scaleobj0.7<g)f\scaleobj0.7<(||sg)=sj=12(jf)\scaleobj0.7<(||s2jg)+R(f,g),superscript𝑠\scaleobj0.7𝑓𝑔\scaleobj0.7𝑓superscript𝑠𝑔𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑗12\scaleobj0.7subscript𝑗𝑓superscript𝑠2subscript𝑗𝑔𝑅𝑓𝑔\displaystyle|\nabla|^{s}(f\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{% \vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to% 0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{% 0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill% {0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}g)-f\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode% \hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-% 4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}% {}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}\pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34% 723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4% .25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723% pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.347% 23pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}(|\nabla|^{s}g)=s\sum_{j=1}^{2}(\partial_{j% }f)\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture% \makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}% \pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}% {0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}(|\nabla|^{s-2}\partial_{j}g)+R(f,g),| ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_f start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP italic_g ) - italic_f start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP ( | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_g ) = italic_s ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f ) start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP ( | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g ) + italic_R ( italic_f , italic_g ) , (2.26)

and R𝑅Ritalic_R satisfies

R(f,g)L2fCsεgB2,sε.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm𝑅𝑓𝑔superscript𝐿2subscriptnorm𝑓superscript𝐶𝑠𝜀subscriptnorm𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝑠𝜀2\displaystyle\|R(f,g)\|_{L^{2}}\lesssim\|f\|_{C^{s-\varepsilon}}\|g\|_{B^{s-% \varepsilon}_{2,\infty}}.∥ italic_R ( italic_f , italic_g ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_f ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

Lemma 2.6 is well known in the case of 2superscript2\mathbb{R}^{2}blackboard_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT; see the more general result in [3, Theorem 2.92]. For an argument in the periodic setting, we refer to [45, Lemma 13].

Proof of Proposition 2.4.

We begin by writing

s(u3)3u2su=superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠superscript𝑢33superscript𝑢2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝑢absent\displaystyle\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}(u^{3})-3u^{2}\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}u=⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - 3 italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u = ||s(u3)3u2||susuperscript𝑠superscript𝑢33superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠𝑢\displaystyle|\nabla|^{s}(u^{3})-3u^{2}|\nabla|^{s}u| ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - 3 italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u (2.27)
+(s||s)(u3)3u2(s||s)(u).superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠superscript𝑠superscript𝑢33superscript𝑢2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠superscript𝑠𝑢\displaystyle+(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}-|\nabla|^{s})(u^{3})-3u^{2}(\langle% \nabla\rangle^{s}-|\nabla|^{s})(u).+ ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - 3 italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_u ) . (2.28)

By the mean-value theorem,

|ns|n|s|ns1for alln2.formulae-sequenceless-than-or-similar-tosuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛𝑠superscript𝑛𝑠superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛𝑠1for all𝑛superscript2\displaystyle|\langle n\rangle^{s}-|n|^{s}|\lesssim\langle n\rangle^{s-1}\quad% \text{for all}\quad n\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}.| ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_n | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | ≲ ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for all italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (2.29)

If s1𝑠1s\leq 1italic_s ≤ 1, then (2.29) implies

(s||s)(u3)L2uL63.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnormsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠superscript𝑠superscript𝑢3superscript𝐿2superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐿63\displaystyle\|(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}-|\nabla|^{s})(u^{3})\|_{L^{2}}% \lesssim\|u\|_{L^{6}}^{3}.∥ ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (2.30)

Otherwise, if s>1𝑠1s>1italic_s > 1, (2.10) implies

(s||s)(u3)L2u3Hs1uL2uHs1+εless-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnormsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠superscript𝑠superscript𝑢3superscript𝐿2subscriptnormsuperscript𝑢3superscript𝐻𝑠1less-than-or-similar-tosuperscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐿2subscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐻𝑠1𝜀\displaystyle\|(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}-|\nabla|^{s})(u^{3})\|_{L^{2}}% \lesssim\|u^{3}\|_{H^{s-1}}\lesssim\|u\|_{L^{\infty}}^{2}\|u\|_{H^{s-1+% \varepsilon}}∥ ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - 1 + italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (2.31)

for any ε>0𝜀0\varepsilon>0italic_ε > 0. We also have by (2.29) that

u2(s||s)(u)L2uL2uHs1.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnormsuperscript𝑢2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠superscript𝑠𝑢superscript𝐿2superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐿2subscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐻𝑠1\displaystyle\|u^{2}(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}-|\nabla|^{s})(u)\|_{L^{2}}% \lesssim\|u\|_{L^{\infty}}^{2}\|u\|_{H^{s-1}}.∥ italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( italic_u ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (2.32)

Now (2.30), (2.31), and (2.32) give

(2.28)uCsε3.less-than-or-similar-toitalic-(2.28italic-)superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐶𝑠𝜀3\displaystyle\eqref{comdiff}\lesssim\|u\|_{C^{s-\varepsilon}}^{3}.italic_( italic_) ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

For (2.27), we write

(2.27)=italic-(2.27italic-)absent\displaystyle\eqref{commain}=italic_( italic_) = ||s(u3)3||s(u2\scaleobj0.7<u)superscript𝑠superscript𝑢33superscript𝑠\scaleobj0.7superscript𝑢2𝑢\displaystyle|\nabla|^{s}(u^{3})-3|\nabla|^{s}(u^{2}\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{% \leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.% 45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor% {pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}% {}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}\pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34% 723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4% .25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723% pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.347% 23pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}u)| ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - 3 | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP italic_u ) (2.33)
+3||s(u2\scaleobj0.7<u)3u2\scaleobj0.7<||su3superscript𝑠\scaleobj0.7superscript𝑢2𝑢\scaleobj0.73superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠𝑢\displaystyle+3|\nabla|^{s}(u^{2}\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to% 8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt% \hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}% {}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}\pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34% 723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4% .25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723% pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.347% 23pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}u)-3u^{2}\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{% \leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.% 45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor% {pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}% {}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}\pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34% 723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4% .25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723% pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.347% 23pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}|\nabla|^{s}u+ 3 | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP italic_u ) - 3 italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u (2.34)
+3u2\scaleobj0.7<||su3u2||su.\scaleobj0.73superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠𝑢3superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠𝑢\displaystyle+3u^{2}\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to% 8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}% \pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}% {0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}|\nabla|^{s}u-3u^{2}|\nabla|^{s}u.+ 3 italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u - 3 italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u . (2.35)

First, we have

(2.35)=3(u2\scaleobj0.7=||su+u2\scaleobj0.7>||su).italic-(2.35italic-)3\scaleobj0.7superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠𝑢\scaleobj0.7superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠𝑢\displaystyle\eqref{com3}=-3\big{(}u^{2}\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode% \hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-% 4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}% {}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}\pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34% 723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4% .25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723% pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.347% 23pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.28406pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor% }{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$=$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}|\nabla|^{s}u+u^{2}\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{% \leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.% 45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor% {pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}% {}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}\pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34% 723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4% .25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723% pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.347% 23pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$>$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}|\nabla|^{s}u\big{)}.italic_( italic_) = - 3 ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 = end_BINOP | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u + italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 > end_BINOP | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u ) .

Using (2.15) and (2.8), we have

u2\scaleobj0.7=||suL2u2\scaleobj0.7=||suCs4u2Cs2||suCs4uCs22uC3s4uCsε3.less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnorm\scaleobj0.7superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠𝑢superscript𝐿2subscriptnorm\scaleobj0.7superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠𝑢superscript𝐶𝑠4less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptnormsuperscript𝑢2superscript𝐶𝑠2subscriptnormsuperscript𝑠𝑢superscript𝐶𝑠4less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptsuperscriptnorm𝑢2superscript𝐶𝑠2subscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐶3𝑠4less-than-or-similar-tosuperscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐶𝑠𝜀3\displaystyle\|u^{2}\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to% 8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}% \pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}% {0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.28406pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor% }{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$=$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}|\nabla|^{s}u\|_{L^{2}}\lesssim\|u^{2}% \mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture% \makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}% \pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}% {0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.28406pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor% }{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$=$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}|\nabla|^{s}u\|_{C^{\frac{s}{4}}}\lesssim\|% u^{2}\|_{C^{\frac{s}{2}}}\||\nabla|^{s}u\|_{C^{-\frac{s}{4}}}\lesssim\|u\|^{2}% _{C^{\frac{s}{2}}}\|u\|_{C^{\frac{3s}{4}}}\lesssim\|u\|_{C^{s-\varepsilon}}^{3}.∥ italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 = end_BINOP | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 = end_BINOP | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 italic_s end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

We obtain the same bound for u2\scaleobj0.7>||su\scaleobj0.7superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠𝑢u^{2}\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{% \pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}% \pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}% {0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$>$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}|\nabla|^{s}uitalic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_BINOP 0.7 > end_BINOP | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u by using (2.14). Thus,

(2.35)uCsε3.less-than-or-similar-toitalic-(2.35italic-)superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐶𝑠𝜀3\displaystyle\eqref{com3}\lesssim\|u\|_{C^{s-\varepsilon}}^{3}.italic_( italic_) ≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

For (2.33), we use (2.20). It remains to control (2.34) for which we use Lemma 2.6. For the remainder term, we obtain the bound uCsε3less-than-or-similar-toabsentsuperscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐶𝑠𝜀3\lesssim\|u\|_{C^{s-\varepsilon}}^{3}≲ ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, after using (2.8). For the first term, we fix j=1,2𝑗12j=1,2italic_j = 1 , 2, and use (2.13) and (2.8),

(ju2)\scaleobj0.7<(||s2ju)L2subscriptnorm\scaleobj0.7subscript𝑗superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠2subscript𝑗𝑢superscript𝐿2\displaystyle\|(\partial_{j}u^{2})\mathbin{\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to% 8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt% \hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}% {}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}\pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34% 723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4% .25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723% pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.347% 23pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}(|\nabla|^{s-2}\partial_{j}u)\|_{L^{2}}∥ ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP ( | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT N1N2(jPN1(u2))\scaleobj0.7<(||s2jPN2u)L2absentsubscriptmuch-less-thansubscript𝑁1subscript𝑁2subscriptnorm\scaleobj0.7subscript𝑗subscript𝑃subscript𝑁1superscript𝑢2superscript𝑠2subscript𝑗subscript𝑃subscript𝑁2𝑢superscript𝐿2\displaystyle\leq\sum_{N_{1}\ll N_{2}}\|(\partial_{j}P_{N_{1}}(u^{2}))\mathbin% {\scaleobj{0.7}{\leavevmode\hbox to8.9pt{\vbox to8.9pt{\pgfpicture% \makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 4.45pt\lower-4.45pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}% \pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}% {0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\nullfont% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }% \pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{}{{}}{}{{}}{% }\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{\hbox{{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{{}{{{}}}{{}}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{{}% \pgfsys@moveto{4.25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{2.34723pt}{4.2% 5pt}{0.0pt}{4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{-4.25pt}{2.34723pt}{-4.% 25pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@curveto{-4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{-2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{0.0pt}{-% 4.25pt}\pgfsys@curveto{2.34723pt}{-4.25pt}{4.25pt}{-2.34723pt}{4.25pt}{0.0pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ } }{{{{}}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1% .0}{-2.72223pt}{-1.75pt}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\definecolor{pgfstrokecolor}{% rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\hbox{{\scriptsize$<$}} }}\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope}}} \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{}{}\hss}% \pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}% \lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}}}(|\nabla|^{s-2}\partial_{j}P_{N_{2}}u)\|_{L% ^{2}}≤ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) start_BINOP 0.7 < end_BINOP ( | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
N1N2jPN1(u2)Lx||s2jPN2uHsless-than-or-similar-toabsentsubscriptmuch-less-thansubscript𝑁1subscript𝑁2subscriptnormsubscript𝑗subscript𝑃subscript𝑁1superscript𝑢2subscriptsuperscript𝐿𝑥subscriptnormsuperscript𝑠2subscript𝑗subscript𝑃subscript𝑁2𝑢superscript𝐻𝑠\displaystyle\lesssim\sum_{N_{1}\ll N_{2}}\|\partial_{j}P_{N_{1}}(u^{2})\|_{L^% {\infty}_{x}}\||\nabla|^{s-2}\partial_{j}P_{N_{2}}u\|_{H^{s}}≲ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ | ∇ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
N1N2N11s+εN2s1N2s+εu2CsεuHsε.less-than-or-similar-toabsentsubscriptmuch-less-thansubscript𝑁1subscript𝑁2superscriptsubscript𝑁11𝑠𝜀superscriptsubscript𝑁2𝑠1superscriptsubscript𝑁2𝑠𝜀subscriptnormsuperscript𝑢2superscript𝐶𝑠𝜀subscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐻𝑠𝜀\displaystyle\lesssim\sum_{N_{1}\ll N_{2}}N_{1}^{1-s+\varepsilon}N_{2}^{s-1}N_% {2}^{-s+\varepsilon}\|u^{2}\|_{C^{s-\varepsilon}}\|u\|_{H^{s-\varepsilon}}.≲ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 - italic_s + italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s + italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

Now, if s>1𝑠1s>1italic_s > 1, taking ε<12𝜀12\varepsilon<\frac{1}{2}italic_ε < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG we may sum over the dyadics. If s1𝑠1s\leq 1italic_s ≤ 1, we need ε<12s𝜀12𝑠\varepsilon<\frac{1}{2}sitalic_ε < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_s. ∎

2.3. The white noise and stochastic convolution

The space-time white noise ξ𝜉\xiitalic_ξ is the unique (in law) random distribution such that {ξ,ϕ}ϕL2(×𝕋2)subscript𝜉italic-ϕitalic-ϕsuperscript𝐿2superscript𝕋2\{\langle\xi,\phi\rangle\}_{\phi\in L^{2}(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{T}^{2})}{ ⟨ italic_ξ , italic_ϕ ⟩ } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ ∈ italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_R × blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a family of centred Gaussian random variables on a probability space (Ω,,)Ω(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})( roman_Ω , caligraphic_F , blackboard_P ) with the property that

𝔼[ξ,ϕξ,ψ]=ϕ,ψL2(×𝕋2)𝔼delimited-[]𝜉italic-ϕ𝜉𝜓subscriptitalic-ϕ𝜓superscript𝐿2superscript𝕋2\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\big{[}\langle\xi,\phi\rangle\langle\xi,\psi\rangle\big% {]}=\langle\phi,\psi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{T}^{2})}blackboard_E [ ⟨ italic_ξ , italic_ϕ ⟩ ⟨ italic_ξ , italic_ψ ⟩ ] = ⟨ italic_ϕ , italic_ψ ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_R × blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (2.36)

for any ϕ,ψCc(×𝕋2)italic-ϕ𝜓subscriptsuperscript𝐶𝑐superscript𝕋2\phi,\psi\in C^{\infty}_{c}(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_ϕ , italic_ψ ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_R × blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). For t0𝑡0t\geq 0italic_t ≥ 0, we set

~t=σ({ξ,ϕ:ϕ|(t,+)×𝕋20,ϕL2(×𝕋2)})subscript~𝑡𝜎conditional-set𝜉italic-ϕformulae-sequenceevaluated-atitalic-ϕ𝑡superscript𝕋20italic-ϕsuperscript𝐿2superscript𝕋2\tilde{\mathcal{F}}_{t}=\sigma\big{(}\big{\{}\langle\xi,\phi\rangle\,:\,\phi|_% {(t,+\infty)\times\mathbb{T}^{2}}\equiv 0,\,\phi\in L^{2}(\mathbb{R}\times% \mathbb{T}^{2})\big{\}}\big{)}over~ start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_σ ( { ⟨ italic_ξ , italic_ϕ ⟩ : italic_ϕ | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t , + ∞ ) × blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ 0 , italic_ϕ ∈ italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_R × blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) } )

and we denote by {t}t0subscriptsubscript𝑡𝑡0\{\mathcal{F}_{t}\}_{t\geq 0}{ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ≥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the usual augmentation of the filtration {~t}t0subscriptsubscript~𝑡𝑡0\{\tilde{\mathcal{F}}_{t}\}_{t\geq 0}{ over~ start_ARG caligraphic_F end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ≥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (see [47, p. 45]).

We define the stochastic convolution \@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)[4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) in a pathwise manner as the space-time distribution satisfying

\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ),ϕLt,x2:=2ξ(t),𝟏{0tt}sπ2S(tt)ϕLt,x2,assignsubscriptsubscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉italic-ϕsubscriptsuperscript𝐿2superscript𝑡𝑥2subscript𝜉superscript𝑡subscript10superscript𝑡𝑡superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscript𝜋2𝑆superscript𝑡superscript𝑡italic-ϕsubscriptsuperscript𝐿2superscript𝑡𝑥\displaystyle\langle\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color% \@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi),\phi\rangle_{L^{2}_{t^{\prime},x}}:={\sqrt{2}}\langle\xi(t^{% \prime}),\mathbf{1}_{\{0\leq t^{\prime}\leq t\}}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\pi_{% 2}S(t-t^{\prime})^{\ast}\phi\rangle_{L^{2}_{t^{\prime},x}},⟨ [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) , italic_ϕ ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ italic_ξ ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT { 0 ≤ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_t } end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϕ ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (2.37)

for all test functions ϕ=(ϕ1,ϕ2):𝕋2:italic-ϕsuperscriptsubscriptitalic-ϕ1subscriptitalic-ϕ2topsuperscript𝕋2\phi=(\phi_{1},\phi_{2})^{\top}:\mathbb{T}^{2}\to\mathbb{R}italic_ϕ = ( italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊤ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → blackboard_R. Here, S(t)𝑆𝑡S(t)italic_S ( italic_t ) is the linear propagator for the (damped) wave equation, and it is given by the formula

et2(cos(t[])+12sin(t[])[]sin(t[])[]([]+14[])sin(t[])cos(t[])12sin(t[])[]),superscript𝑒𝑡2matrix𝑡delimited-[]12𝑡delimited-[]delimited-[]𝑡delimited-⟨⟩delimited-[]delimited-[]delimited-[]14delimited-[]𝑡delimited-[]𝑡delimited-[]12𝑡delimited-[]delimited-[]e^{-\frac{t}{2}}\begin{pmatrix}\cos\big{(}t[\nabla]\big{)}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{% \sin(t[\nabla])}{[\nabla]}&\frac{\sin(t\langle[\nabla]\rangle)}{[\nabla]}\\ -\big{(}[\nabla]+\frac{1}{4[\nabla]}\big{)}\sin(t[\nabla])&\cos(t[\nabla])-% \frac{1}{2}\frac{\sin(t[\nabla])}{[\nabla]}\end{pmatrix},italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL roman_cos ( italic_t [ ∇ ] ) + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_sin ( italic_t [ ∇ ] ) end_ARG start_ARG [ ∇ ] end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL divide start_ARG roman_sin ( italic_t ⟨ [ ∇ ] ⟩ ) end_ARG start_ARG [ ∇ ] end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - ( [ ∇ ] + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 [ ∇ ] end_ARG ) roman_sin ( italic_t [ ∇ ] ) end_CELL start_CELL roman_cos ( italic_t [ ∇ ] ) - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_sin ( italic_t [ ∇ ] ) end_ARG start_ARG [ ∇ ] end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) , (2.38)

where []:=(34Δ)12assigndelimited-[]superscript34Δ12[\nabla]:=(\frac{3}{4}-\Delta)^{\frac{1}{2}}[ ∇ ] := ( divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG - roman_Δ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. For smooth ξ𝜉\xiitalic_ξ, the definition (2.38) corresponds exactly to

\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)=0tS(tt)(02sξ(t))𝑑t.subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉superscriptsubscript0𝑡𝑆𝑡superscript𝑡matrix02superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝜉superscript𝑡differential-dsuperscript𝑡\displaystyle\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color% \@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)=\int_{0}^{t}S(t-t^{\prime})\begin{pmatrix}0\\ \sqrt{2}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\xi(t^{\prime})\end{pmatrix}dt^{\prime}.[4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) = ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (2.39)

It enjoys the following regularity property.

Lemma 2.7.

Let 0<α<s0𝛼𝑠0<\alpha<s0 < italic_α < italic_s and N20{}𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ }. Then, ΠN\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)C([0,+);Zα)subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉𝐶0superscript𝑍𝛼\Pi_{\leq N}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color% \@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\in C([0,+\infty);Z^{\alpha})roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∈ italic_C ( [ 0 , + ∞ ) ; italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) almost surely. Moreover, for every T>0𝑇0T>0italic_T > 0,

𝔼[supN20{}ΠN\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)C([0,T];Zα)p]C(p,T),𝔼delimited-[]subscriptsupremum𝑁superscript2subscript0superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉𝐶0𝑇superscript𝑍𝛼𝑝𝐶𝑝𝑇\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\bigg{[}\sup_{N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}}\|% \Pi_{\leq N}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color% \@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\|_{C([0,T];Z^{\alpha})}^{p}\bigg{]}\leq C(p,T),blackboard_E [ roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ } end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ≤ italic_C ( italic_p , italic_T ) , (2.40)

where 1p<1𝑝1\leq p<\infty1 ≤ italic_p < ∞.

Before we give the proof, we first recall a quantitative version of the Kolmogorov continuity criterion, which is a slight modification of [30, Lemma 2.4].

Lemma 2.8.

Given ε>0𝜀0\varepsilon>0italic_ε > 0, j0𝑗subscript0j\in\mathbb{N}_{0}italic_j ∈ blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, γ(0,1)𝛾01\gamma\in(0,1)italic_γ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ), 1p<1𝑝1\leq p<\infty1 ≤ italic_p < ∞, a Banach space X𝑋Xitalic_X, and a process F:[j,j+1]X:𝐹𝑗𝑗1𝑋F:[j,j+1]\to Xitalic_F : [ italic_j , italic_j + 1 ] → italic_X that is almost surely continuous,

𝔼[FCγ([j,j+1];X)p]γ,ε𝔼[F(j)Xp]+supjt<tj+1𝔼[F(t)F(t)Xp|tt|1+γp+ε].subscriptless-than-or-similar-to𝛾𝜀𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnorm𝐹superscript𝐶𝛾𝑗𝑗1𝑋𝑝𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnorm𝐹𝑗𝑋𝑝subscriptsupremum𝑗superscript𝑡𝑡𝑗1𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnorm𝐹𝑡𝐹superscript𝑡𝑋𝑝superscript𝑡superscript𝑡1𝛾𝑝𝜀\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\big{[}\|F\|_{C^{\gamma}([j,j+1];X)}^{p}\big{]}\lesssim% _{\gamma,\varepsilon}\mathbb{E}[\|F(j)\|_{X}^{p}]+\sup_{j\leq t^{\prime}<t\leq j% +1}\mathbb{E}\bigg{[}\frac{\|F(t)-F(t^{\prime})\|_{X}^{p}}{|t-t^{\prime}|^{1+% \gamma p+\varepsilon}}\bigg{]}.blackboard_E [ ∥ italic_F ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( [ italic_j , italic_j + 1 ] ; italic_X ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ≲ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_E [ ∥ italic_F ( italic_j ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] + roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j ≤ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < italic_t ≤ italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_E [ divide start_ARG ∥ italic_F ( italic_t ) - italic_F ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_γ italic_p + italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] . (2.41)
Proof of Lemma 2.7.

The almost sure properties and the moment bound (2.40) when N=+𝑁N=+\inftyitalic_N = + ∞ were proved in [18, Proposition 2.7 and 2.8]. Note that this does not automatically imply (2.40), since the operator ΠNsubscriptΠabsent𝑁\Pi_{\leq N}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is not bounded on 𝒞αsuperscript𝒞𝛼\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. However, the estimate immediately follows form the arguments in [18, Proposition 2.8], so here we highlight the main modifications to the argument. For (2.40), a telescoping series argument and Minkowski’s inequality shows that it suffices to prove that

𝔼[Π1\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)C([0,T];Zα)p]𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent1subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉𝐶0𝑇superscript𝑍𝛼𝑝\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\big{[}\|\Pi_{\leq 1}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{% \leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\|_{C([0,T];Z^{\alpha})}^{p}\big{]}blackboard_E [ ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] p,T1,subscriptless-than-or-similar-to𝑝𝑇absent1\displaystyle\lesssim_{p,T}1,≲ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , (2.42)
𝔼[Π2M\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)ΠM\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)C([0,T];Zα)p]𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent2𝑀subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉subscriptΠabsent𝑀subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉𝐶0𝑇superscript𝑍𝛼𝑝\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\big{[}\|\Pi_{\leq 2M}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{% \leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)-\Pi_{\leq M}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{% \set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\|_{C([0,T];Z^{\alpha})}^{p}]blackboard_E [ ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) - roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] p,TMθsubscriptless-than-or-similar-to𝑝𝑇absentsuperscript𝑀𝜃\displaystyle\lesssim_{p,T}M^{-\theta}≲ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (2.43)

for some θ>0𝜃0\theta>0italic_θ > 0, and every M20𝑀superscript2subscript0M\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_M ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

For shorthand, we define \@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξM):=Π2M\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)ΠM\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)assignsubscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡subscript𝜉𝑀subscriptΠabsent2𝑀subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉subscriptΠabsent𝑀subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi_{M}):=\Pi_{\leq 2M}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode% \hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)-\Pi_{\leq M}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{% \set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)[4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) := roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) - roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ). To control the supremum over t[0,T]𝑡0𝑇t\in[0,T]italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_T ] in (2.43), we decompose [0,T]0𝑇[0,T][ 0 , italic_T ] into unit intervals and then apply Lemma 2.8 on each interval. We only discuss the first term on the right-hand side of (2.41). The estimates required for the time-differences term in (2.41) follow similarly using the strategy below and the estimates in the proof of [18, Proposition 2.7], up to the modification we give below. Fix t(0,T]𝑡0𝑇t\in(0,T]italic_t ∈ ( 0 , italic_T ]. Recalling the definition of the Zαsuperscript𝑍𝛼Z^{\alpha}italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-norm in (2.4), for finite p>2sα𝑝2𝑠𝛼p>\frac{2}{s-\alpha}italic_p > divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_s - italic_α end_ARG, Minkowski’s inequality implies

𝔼[\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξM)Zαp]1p𝔼superscriptdelimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡subscript𝜉𝑀superscript𝑍𝛼𝑝1𝑝\displaystyle\mathbb{E}[\|\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{% \set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi_{M})\|_{Z^{\alpha}}^{p}]^{\frac{1}{p}}blackboard_E [ ∥ [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT TeT8𝔼[supτ[T1,T]S(τ)\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξM)𝒞αp]1p.less-than-or-similar-toabsentsubscriptsuperscript𝑇superscript𝑒superscript𝑇8𝔼superscriptdelimited-[]subscriptsupremum𝜏superscript𝑇1superscript𝑇superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑆𝜏subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡subscript𝜉𝑀superscript𝒞𝛼𝑝1𝑝\displaystyle\lesssim\sum_{T^{\prime}\in\mathbb{N}}e^{\frac{T^{\prime}}{8}}% \mathbb{E}\bigg{[}\sup_{\tau\in[T^{\prime}-1,T^{\prime}]}\|S(\tau)\mathchoice{% \raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi_{M})\|_{\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}}^{p}\bigg{]}^{\frac{1}{p}}.≲ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ blackboard_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 8 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_E [ roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ ∈ [ italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 , italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_S ( italic_τ ) [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

To control the supremum over τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ, we again need to use Lemma 2.8. We again only discuss the contribution from the first term from (2.41). By Sobolev embedding and the Gaussianity of ξ𝜉\xiitalic_ξ, we have

𝔼[α+2pS(T1)\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξM)𝒲0,pp]1p𝔼superscriptdelimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝛼2𝑝𝑆superscript𝑇1subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡subscript𝜉𝑀superscript𝒲0𝑝𝑝1𝑝\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\big{[}\|\langle\nabla\rangle^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p}}S(T^{% \prime}-1)\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[% 4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi_{M})\|_{\mathcal{W}^{0,p}}^{p}\big{]}^{\frac{1}{p}}blackboard_E [ ∥ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 ) [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (nn2α+4p𝔼[|S(T1)\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξM),ϕn|2])12,less-than-or-similar-toabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑛superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛2𝛼4𝑝𝔼delimited-[]superscript𝑆superscript𝑇1subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡subscript𝜉𝑀subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑛212\displaystyle\lesssim\bigg{(}\sum_{n}\langle n\rangle^{2\alpha+\frac{4}{p}}\,% \mathbb{E}[|\langle S(T^{\prime}-1)\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode% \hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi_{M}),\phi_{n}\rangle|^{2}]\bigg{)}^{\frac{1}{2}},≲ ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_α + divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_E [ | ⟨ italic_S ( italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 ) [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

where ϕn=(en,n1en)subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑛superscriptsubscript𝑒𝑛superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛1subscript𝑒𝑛top\phi_{n}=(e_{n},\langle n\rangle^{-1}e_{n})^{\top}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊤ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Using (2.37) and the frequency localisations from the difference in \@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξM)subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡subscript𝜉𝑀\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi_{M})[4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), which forces |n|Msimilar-tosubscript𝑛𝑀|n|_{\infty}\sim M| italic_n | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_M, we bound this by

eT2(|n|Mn2α+4p2s2)12eT2M(sα2p),less-than-or-similar-tosuperscript𝑒superscript𝑇2superscriptsubscriptsimilar-tosubscript𝑛𝑀superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛2𝛼4𝑝2𝑠212superscript𝑒superscript𝑇2superscript𝑀𝑠𝛼2𝑝\displaystyle e^{-\frac{T^{\prime}}{2}}\bigg{(}\sum_{|n|_{\infty}\sim M}% \langle n\rangle^{2\alpha+\frac{4}{p}-2s-2}\bigg{)}^{\frac{1}{2}}\lesssim e^{-% \frac{T^{\prime}}{2}}M^{-(s-\alpha-\frac{2}{p})},italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_n | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_α + divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG - 2 italic_s - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≲ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_s - italic_α - divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

which gives (2.43), as long as p>2sα𝑝2𝑠𝛼p>\frac{2}{s-\alpha}italic_p > divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_s - italic_α end_ARG. Finally, (2.42) follows similarly. ∎

3. The flow for (1.1)

3.1. Review of well-posedness

In this section, we recall elements from [18] of the notion of solution and associated well-posedness for the equation (1.1). We view (1.1) in the following integral formulation:

𝐮=S(t)𝐮0+0tS(tt)(02sξ(t))𝑑t0tS(tt)(0(π1𝐮(t))3)𝑑t,𝐮𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0superscriptsubscript0𝑡𝑆𝑡superscript𝑡matrix02superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝜉superscript𝑡differential-dsuperscript𝑡superscriptsubscript0𝑡𝑆𝑡superscript𝑡matrix0superscriptsubscript𝜋1𝐮superscript𝑡3differential-dsuperscript𝑡\displaystyle{\mathbf{u}}=S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{0}+\int_{0}^{t}S(t-t^{\prime})% \begin{pmatrix}0\\ {\text{\small{$\sqrt{2}$}}}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\xi(t^{\prime})\end{% pmatrix}dt^{\prime}-\int_{0}^{t}S(t-t^{\prime})\begin{pmatrix}0\\ (\pi_{1}{\mathbf{u}}(t^{\prime}))^{3}\end{pmatrix}dt^{\prime},bold_u = italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (3.1)

where π1subscript𝜋1\pi_{1}italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denotes the projection to the first coordinate. Motivated by (3.1) and these considerations about the stochastic convolution (2.39), we define a solution of (1.1)italic-(1.1italic-)\eqref{SDNLW}italic_( italic_) in terms of the first-order expansion [34, 6, 11]:

𝐮(t)=Φt(𝐮0,ξ)=S(t)𝐮0+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)+𝐰(t),𝐮𝑡subscriptΦ𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉𝐰𝑡\displaystyle{\mathbf{u}}(t)=\Phi_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)=S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{% 0}+\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]% { \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)+{\mathbf{w}}(t),bold_u ( italic_t ) = roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) + bold_w ( italic_t ) , (3.2)

where 𝐰=(w,tw)𝐰superscript𝑤subscript𝑡𝑤top{\mathbf{w}}=(w,\partial_{t}w)^{\top}bold_w = ( italic_w , ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊤ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT solves the equation

𝐰(t)=0tS(tt)(0π1(S(t)𝐮0+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)+𝐰(t))3)𝑑t,𝐰𝑡superscriptsubscript0𝑡𝑆𝑡superscript𝑡matrix0subscript𝜋1superscript𝑆superscript𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  superscript𝑡𝜉𝐰superscript𝑡3differential-dsuperscript𝑡\displaystyle{\mathbf{w}}(t)=-\int_{0}^{t}S(t-t^{\prime})\begin{pmatrix}0\\ \pi_{1}(S(t^{\prime}){\mathbf{u}}_{0}+\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{% \leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t^{\prime}}(\xi)+{\mathbf{w}}(t^{\prime}))^{3}\end{pmatrix}dt^{% \prime},bold_w ( italic_t ) = - ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) + bold_w ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (3.3)

We note that the equation (3.3) is chosen to be the mild formulation of the differential equation

t2w+tw+(1Δ)w+π1(S(t)𝐮0+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)+𝐰(t))3=0,superscriptsubscript𝑡2𝑤subscript𝑡𝑤1Δ𝑤subscript𝜋1superscript𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉𝐰𝑡30\partial_{t}^{2}w+\partial_{t}w+(1-\Delta)w+\pi_{1}(S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{0}+% \mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)+{\mathbf{w}}(t))^{3}=0,∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w + ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w + ( 1 - roman_Δ ) italic_w + italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) + bold_w ( italic_t ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0 ,

which we obtain by inserting the ansatz (3.2) into the equation (1.1). We recall the well-posedness statement for (3.3) below in Proposition 3.1.

In order to make the arguments in this paper rigorous, we require approximating finite dimensional versions of (1.1), which we describe now. Given N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we define the truncated system of (1.3) by

{t(uNvN)=(011Δ1)(uNvN)ΠN(0(ΠNuN)3)+(02sξ)(uNvN)(0)=(u0u1).casessubscript𝑡matrixsuperscript𝑢𝑁superscript𝑣𝑁absentmatrix011Δ1matrixsuperscript𝑢𝑁superscript𝑣𝑁subscriptΠabsent𝑁matrix0superscriptsubscriptΠabsent𝑁superscript𝑢𝑁3matrix02superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝜉matrixsuperscript𝑢𝑁superscript𝑣𝑁0absentmatrixsubscript𝑢0subscript𝑢1\begin{cases}\partial_{t}\begin{pmatrix}u^{N}\\ v^{N}\end{pmatrix}&=-\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\ 1-\Delta&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}u^{N}\\ v^{N}\end{pmatrix}-\Pi_{\leq N}\begin{pmatrix}0\\ (\Pi_{\leq N}u^{N})^{3}\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\ \sqrt{2}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\xi\end{pmatrix}\\ \begin{pmatrix}u^{N}\\ v^{N}\end{pmatrix}(0)&=\begin{pmatrix}u_{0}\\ u_{1}\end{pmatrix}.\end{cases}{ start_ROW start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) end_CELL start_CELL = - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 1 - roman_Δ end_CELL start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) + ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ξ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ( 0 ) end_CELL start_CELL = ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) . end_CELL end_ROW (3.4)

Solutions to (3.4) naturally decompose as:

𝐮N(t)=ΠN𝐮N(t)+Π>N𝐮N(t)=𝐮N(t)+𝐮N(t),superscript𝐮𝑁𝑡subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscript𝐮𝑁𝑡subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscript𝐮𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮𝑁𝑡subscriptsuperscript𝐮perpendicular-to𝑁𝑡\displaystyle{\mathbf{u}}^{N}(t)=\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}^{N}(t)+\Pi_{>N}{% \mathbf{u}}^{N}(t)={\mathbf{u}}_{N}(t)+{\mathbf{u}}^{\perp}_{N}(t),bold_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_t ) = roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_t ) + roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_t ) = bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) + bold_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ,

where the low-frequency part 𝐮N(t)=:(uN,vN){\mathbf{u}}_{N}(t)=:(u_{N},v_{N})bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) = : ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) solves

{t(uNvN)=(011Δ1)(uNvN)ΠN(0uN3)+(02sΠNξ)(uNvN)(0)=(ΠNu0ΠNu1).casessubscript𝑡matrixsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁absentmatrix011Δ1matrixsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁subscriptΠabsent𝑁matrix0superscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁3matrix02superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝜉matrixsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁0absentmatrixsubscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝑢0subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝑢1\begin{cases}\partial_{t}\begin{pmatrix}u_{N}\\ v_{N}\end{pmatrix}&=-\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\ 1-\Delta&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}u_{N}\\ v_{N}\end{pmatrix}-\Pi_{\leq N}\begin{pmatrix}0\\ u_{N}^{3}\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\ \sqrt{2}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\Pi_{\leq N}\xi\end{pmatrix}\\ \begin{pmatrix}u_{N}\\ v_{N}\end{pmatrix}(0)&=\begin{pmatrix}\Pi_{\leq N}u_{0}\\ \Pi_{\leq N}u_{1}\end{pmatrix}.\end{cases}{ start_ROW start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) end_CELL start_CELL = - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 1 - roman_Δ end_CELL start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) - roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) + ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ( 0 ) end_CELL start_CELL = ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) . end_CELL end_ROW (3.5)

and the high-frequency part 𝐮N=:(uN,vN){\mathbf{u}}^{\perp}_{N}=:(u_{N}^{\perp},v_{N}^{\perp})bold_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = : ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) solves the linear damped stochastic wave equation:

{t(uNvN)=(011Δ1)(uNvN)+(02sΠ>Nξ)(uNvN)(0)=(Π>Nu0Π>Nu1).casessubscript𝑡matrixsubscriptsuperscript𝑢perpendicular-to𝑁subscriptsuperscript𝑣perpendicular-to𝑁absentmatrix011Δ1matrixsubscriptsuperscript𝑢perpendicular-to𝑁subscriptsuperscript𝑣perpendicular-to𝑁matrix02superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝜉matrixsubscriptsuperscript𝑢perpendicular-to𝑁subscriptsuperscript𝑣perpendicular-to𝑁0absentmatrixsubscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝑢0subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝑢1\begin{cases}\partial_{t}\begin{pmatrix}u^{\perp}_{N}\\ v^{\perp}_{N}\end{pmatrix}&=-\begin{pmatrix}0&-1\\ 1-\Delta&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}u^{\perp}_{N}\\ v^{\perp}_{N}\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\ \sqrt{2}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\Pi_{>N}\xi\end{pmatrix}\\ \begin{pmatrix}u^{\perp}_{N}\\ v^{\perp}_{N}\end{pmatrix}(0)&=\begin{pmatrix}\Pi_{>N}u_{0}\\ \Pi_{>N}u_{1}\end{pmatrix}.\end{cases}{ start_ROW start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) end_CELL start_CELL = - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 1 - roman_Δ end_CELL start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) + ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ( 0 ) end_CELL start_CELL = ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) . end_CELL end_ROW (3.6)

We write solutions 𝐮Nsubscript𝐮𝑁{\mathbf{u}}_{N}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to (3.5) as

𝐮N(t)=S(t)ΠN𝐮0+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ΠNξ)+𝐰N(t)=:Φtlin(ΠN𝐮0,ΠNξ)+𝐰N(t).\displaystyle\begin{split}{\mathbf{u}}_{N}(t)&=S(t)\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0% }+\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\Pi_{\leq N}\xi)+{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)\\ &=:\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}(\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0},\Pi_{\leq N}\xi)+{% \mathbf{w}}_{N}(t).\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) end_CELL start_CELL = italic_S ( italic_t ) roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) + bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = : roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) + bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) . end_CELL end_ROW (3.7)

where

Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ):=S(t)𝐮0+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)assignsuperscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉\displaystyle\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi):=S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{0}% +\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) := italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) (3.8)

is the solution map for the linear stochastic damped NLW, and 𝐰Nsubscript𝐰𝑁{\mathbf{w}}_{N}bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT solves

𝐰N(t)=0tS(tt)ΠN(0(π1ΠN(S(t)𝐮0+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)+𝐰N(t)))3)𝑑t.subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡superscriptsubscript0𝑡𝑆𝑡superscript𝑡subscriptΠabsent𝑁matrix0superscriptsubscript𝜋1subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑆superscript𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  superscript𝑡𝜉subscript𝐰𝑁superscript𝑡3differential-dsuperscript𝑡\displaystyle{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)=-\int_{0}^{t}S(t-t^{\prime})\Pi_{\leq N}% \begin{pmatrix}0\\ (\pi_{1}\Pi_{\leq N}(S(t^{\prime}){\mathbf{u}}_{0}+\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0% pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t^{\prime}}(\xi)+{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t^{\prime})))^{3}\end{pmatrix}dt^{% \prime}.bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) = - ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) + bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (3.9)

We will occasionally use the fact that ΠNΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ)=Φtlin(ΠN𝐮0,ΠNξ)subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝜉\Pi_{\leq N}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)=\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}(% \Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0},\Pi_{\leq N}\xi)roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) without explicit reference. We have the following global well-posedness results for (1.1) and (3.9).

Proposition 3.1.

[18, Section 3] Let N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0, 0<α<s0𝛼𝑠0<\alpha<s0 < italic_α < italic_s, T>0𝑇0T>0italic_T > 0, 𝐮0Xαsubscript𝐮0superscript𝑋𝛼{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\in X^{\alpha}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and 𝐰01subscript𝐰0superscript1{\mathbf{w}}_{0}\in\mathcal{H}^{1}bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Then, the equations

𝐰(t)𝐰𝑡\displaystyle{\mathbf{w}}(t)bold_w ( italic_t ) =S(t)𝐰00tS(tt)(0(π1(S(t)𝐮0+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)+𝐯(t)))3)𝑑t,absent𝑆𝑡subscript𝐰0superscriptsubscript0𝑡𝑆𝑡superscript𝑡matrix0superscriptsubscript𝜋1𝑆superscript𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  superscript𝑡𝜉𝐯superscript𝑡3differential-dsuperscript𝑡\displaystyle=S(t){\mathbf{w}}_{0}-\int_{0}^{t}S(t-t^{\prime})\begin{pmatrix}0% \\ (\pi_{1}(S(t^{\prime}){\mathbf{u}}_{0}+\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{% \leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t^{\prime}}(\xi)+{\mathbf{v}}(t^{\prime})))^{3}\end{pmatrix}dt^{% \prime},= italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) + bold_v ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (3.10)
𝐰N(t)subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡\displaystyle{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) =S(t)𝐰00tS(tt)ΠN(0(π1ΠN(S(t)𝐮0+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)+𝐯N(t)))3)𝑑t,absent𝑆𝑡subscript𝐰0superscriptsubscript0𝑡𝑆𝑡superscript𝑡subscriptΠabsent𝑁matrix0superscriptsubscript𝜋1subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑆superscript𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  superscript𝑡𝜉subscript𝐯𝑁superscript𝑡3differential-dsuperscript𝑡\displaystyle=S(t){\mathbf{w}}_{0}-\int_{0}^{t}S(t-t^{\prime})\Pi_{\leq N}% \begin{pmatrix}0\\ (\pi_{1}\Pi_{\leq N}(S(t^{\prime}){\mathbf{u}}_{0}+\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0% pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t^{\prime}}(\xi)+{\mathbf{v}}_{N}(t^{\prime})))^{3}\end{pmatrix}dt^{% \prime},= italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) + bold_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (3.11)

are almost surely globally-well posed in 1(𝕋2)superscript1superscript𝕋2\mathcal{H}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{2})caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). Moreover, the following hold true:

(i) With 𝐰Nsubscript𝐰𝑁{\mathbf{w}}_{N}bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denoting the solution to (3.11) with 𝐰00subscript𝐰00{\mathbf{w}}_{0}\equiv 0bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≡ 0, for every N20{}𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ } and for 0<α<s10𝛼𝑠10<\alpha<s\wedge 10 < italic_α < italic_s ∧ 1, it holds that

𝐰N(t)C([0,T];1)2C(ΠN𝐮0Xα,ΠN\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)C([0,T];Xα),T).superscriptsubscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡𝐶0𝑇superscript12𝐶subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0superscript𝑋𝛼subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉𝐶0𝑇superscript𝑋𝛼𝑇\displaystyle\begin{split}\|{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)\|_{C([0,T];\mathcal{H}^{1})}^{% 2}&\leq C(\|\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\|_{X^{\alpha}},\|\Pi_{\leq N}% \mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\|_{C([0,T];X^{\alpha})},T).\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ∥ bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ≤ italic_C ( ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_T ) . end_CELL end_ROW (3.12)

(ii) For every T<𝑇T<\inftyitalic_T < ∞, we have

limN𝐰𝐰NC([0,T];1)=0a.s.subscript𝑁subscriptnorm𝐰subscript𝐰𝑁𝐶0𝑇superscript10a.s.\displaystyle\lim_{N\to\infty}\|{\mathbf{w}}-{\mathbf{w}}_{N}\|_{C([0,T];% \mathcal{H}^{1})}=0\quad\textup{a.s.}roman_lim start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N → ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ bold_w - bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 a.s.

The existence and uniqueness of 𝐰𝐰{\mathbf{w}}bold_w and 𝐰Nsubscript𝐰𝑁{\mathbf{w}}_{N}bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is guaranteed by an application of Banach fixed point theorem, which uses only the fractional Leibniz rule and Sobolev embedding. The global bound (3.12) follows from a Gronwall argument on an energy quantity resembling that of the Hamiltonian for the undamped, non-stochastic NLW; see [18, (3.12)]. The a priori bound (3.12) is only of interest when s<1𝑠1s<1italic_s < 1. When s1𝑠1s\geq 1italic_s ≥ 1, we still have global well-posedness for 𝐰𝐰{\mathbf{w}}bold_w by a Gronwall argument with the energy

HN(u,v):=H(ΠNu,ΠNv),H(u,v):=12𝕋2u2+|u|2+v2dx+14𝕋2u4𝑑x.formulae-sequenceassignsubscript𝐻𝑁𝑢𝑣𝐻subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑣assign𝐻𝑢𝑣12subscriptsuperscript𝕋2superscript𝑢2superscript𝑢2superscript𝑣2𝑑𝑥14subscriptsuperscript𝕋2superscript𝑢4differential-d𝑥\displaystyle\begin{split}H_{N}(u,v)&:=H(\Pi_{\leq N}u,\Pi_{\leq N}v),\\ H(u,v)&:=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}u^{2}+|\nabla u|^{2}+v^{2}dx+\frac{1}% {4}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}u^{4}dx.\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u , italic_v ) end_CELL start_CELL := italic_H ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u , roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v ) , end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_H ( italic_u , italic_v ) end_CELL start_CELL := divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | ∇ italic_u | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x . end_CELL end_ROW (3.13)

We omit the details. See for example [8].

We remark that by regularity counting arguments, we expect 𝐰𝐰{\mathbf{w}}bold_w to be more regular than 1(𝕋2)superscript1superscript𝕋2\mathcal{H}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{2})caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) and to belong to 1+α(𝕋2)superscript1𝛼superscript𝕋2\mathcal{H}^{1+\alpha}(\mathbb{T}^{2})caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). This additional regularity can be justified a posteriori from Proposition 3.1, and we will make use of it later; see Lemma 4.5.

Recall that for𝐮0Xαsubscript𝐮0superscript𝑋𝛼{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\in X^{\alpha}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we have

ΦtN(𝐮0;ξ):=𝐮N(t)=𝐮N(t)+𝐮N(t),assignsuperscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉superscript𝐮𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮𝑁𝑡subscriptsuperscript𝐮perpendicular-to𝑁𝑡\displaystyle\Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0};\xi):={\mathbf{u}}^{N}(t)={\mathbf{% u}}_{N}(t)+{\mathbf{u}}^{\perp}_{N}(t),roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) := bold_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_t ) = bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) + bold_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) , (3.14)

where 𝐮Nsubscript𝐮𝑁{\mathbf{u}}_{N}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT has the decomposition (3.7) and 𝐮N(t)subscriptsuperscript𝐮perpendicular-to𝑁𝑡{\mathbf{u}}^{\perp}_{N}(t)bold_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) solves the linear equation (3.6). When N=𝑁N=\inftyitalic_N = ∞, we write

Φt(𝐮0;ξ):=Φt(𝐮0;ξ):=S(t)𝐮0+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)+𝐰(t),assignsubscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉subscriptΦ𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉assign𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉𝐰𝑡\displaystyle\Phi^{\infty}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0};\xi):=\Phi_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0% };\xi):=S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{0}+\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{% \set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)+{\mathbf{w}}(t),roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) := roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) := italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) + bold_w ( italic_t ) , (3.15)

where 𝐰𝐰{\mathbf{w}}bold_w solves (3.10). We have the following convergence statement for the nonlinear flows.

Lemma 3.2.

Let s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0, 0<α<s0𝛼𝑠0<\alpha<s0 < italic_α < italic_s, 𝐮0Xαsubscript𝐮0superscript𝑋𝛼{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\in X^{\alpha}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and T>0𝑇0T>0italic_T > 0. Then, ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ)superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉\Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) converges to Φt(𝐮0,ξ)subscriptΦ𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉\Phi_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) almost surely in C([0,T];α(𝕋2))𝐶0𝑇superscript𝛼superscript𝕋2C([0,T];\mathcal{H}^{\alpha}(\mathbb{T}^{2}))italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) as N𝑁N\to\inftyitalic_N → ∞.

Proof.

When α<1𝛼1\alpha<1italic_α < 1, this is immediate from (3.14), (3.15), and Proposition 3.1 (iii). When α1𝛼1\alpha\geq 1italic_α ≥ 1, we can estimate the difference 𝐰N𝐰subscript𝐰𝑁𝐰{\mathbf{w}}_{N}-{\mathbf{w}}bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - bold_w in 1+αsuperscript1𝛼\mathcal{H}^{1+\alpha}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT directly using the Duhamel formulation and exploiting the convergence in Proposition 3.1 and the convergence of ΠNS(t)𝐮0subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0\Pi_{\leq N}S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{0}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ΠN\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉\Pi_{\leq N}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color% \@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) in αsuperscript𝛼\mathcal{H}^{\alpha}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. ∎

3.2. Markov semigroups

In this section, we recall how the flows (3.14) and (3.15) generate Markov semigroups on Xαsuperscript𝑋𝛼X^{\alpha}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. We denote by b(Xα)subscript𝑏superscript𝑋𝛼\mathcal{B}_{b}(X^{\alpha})caligraphic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) the space of measurable, bounded functions from Xαsuperscript𝑋𝛼X^{\alpha}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to \mathbb{R}blackboard_R, and by 𝒞b(Xα)subscript𝒞𝑏superscript𝑋𝛼\mathcal{C}_{b}(X^{\alpha})caligraphic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) the space of bounded, continuous functions from Xαsuperscript𝑋𝛼X^{\alpha}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to \mathbb{R}blackboard_R, both endowed with the norm

FL:=sup𝐮0Xα|F(𝐮0)|.assignsubscriptnorm𝐹superscript𝐿subscriptsupremumsubscript𝐮0superscript𝑋𝛼𝐹subscript𝐮0\displaystyle\|F\|_{L^{\infty}}:=\sup_{{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\in X^{\alpha}}|F({% \mathbf{u}}_{0})|.∥ italic_F ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | .

Given N20{}𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ } and Fb(Xα)𝐹subscript𝑏superscript𝑋𝛼F\in\mathcal{B}_{b}(X^{\alpha})italic_F ∈ caligraphic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), we define the family of bounded linear operators 𝒫tN:F𝒫tNF:superscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁maps-to𝐹superscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁𝐹\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N}:F\mapsto\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N}Fcaligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_F ↦ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F, by

𝒫tNF(𝐮0):=𝔼[F(ΦtN(𝐮0;ξ))],t0,formulae-sequenceassignsuperscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁𝐹subscript𝐮0𝔼delimited-[]𝐹superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑡0\displaystyle\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N}F({\mathbf{u}}_{0}):=\mathbb{E}[F(\Phi_{t}^{N}% ({\mathbf{u}}_{0};\xi))],\quad t\geq 0,caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) := blackboard_E [ italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) ) ] , italic_t ≥ 0 , (3.16)

for every 𝐮0Xαsubscript𝐮0superscript𝑋𝛼{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\in X^{\alpha}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and 𝒫t:=𝒫tassignsubscript𝒫𝑡superscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡\mathcal{P}_{t}:=\mathcal{P}_{t}^{\infty}caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. We recall from [18, Section 4], that 𝒫tsubscript𝒫𝑡\mathcal{P}_{t}caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT defines a Markov semigroup. The same is true for the operators 𝒫tNsuperscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N}caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, defined using the truncated flow. We state the main properties of the semigroups {𝒫tN}Nsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁𝑁\{\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N}\}_{N}{ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. For the proof, see [18, Proposition 4.1, Lemma 4.2, and Proposition 4.3].

Lemma 3.3.

Let N20{}𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ }. Then, the following hold true:

(i) Let 𝐮0Xαsubscript𝐮0superscript𝑋𝛼{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\in X^{\alpha}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Then the map [0,)Xα0superscript𝑋𝛼[0,\infty)\to X^{\alpha}[ 0 , ∞ ) → italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT defined by tΦtN(𝐮0;ξ)𝑡superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉t\to\Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0};\xi)italic_t → roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) is adapted with respect to the filtration {t}t0subscriptsubscript𝑡𝑡0\{\mathcal{F}_{t}\}_{t\geq 0}{ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ≥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. In particular, for every t0𝑡0t\geq 0italic_t ≥ 0,

ΦtN(𝐮0;ξ)=ΦtN(𝐮0,𝟏[0,t]ξ)subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript10𝑡𝜉\displaystyle\Phi^{N}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0};\xi)=\Phi^{N}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},% \mathbf{1}_{[0,t]}\xi)roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) = roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 0 , italic_t ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) (3.17)

(ii)For a.e. realisation of ξ𝜉\xiitalic_ξ, and for every t,h0𝑡0t,h\geq 0italic_t , italic_h ≥ 0, we have that

Φt+hN(𝐮0,ξ)=ΦhN(ΦtN(𝐮0,𝟏[0,t]ξ),Rt(𝟏[t,)ξ)),subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript10𝑡𝜉subscript𝑅𝑡subscript1𝑡𝜉\Phi^{N}_{t+h}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)=\Phi^{N}_{h}(\Phi^{N}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0% },\mathbf{1}_{[0,t]}\xi),R_{{t}}(\mathbf{1}_{[t,\infty)}\xi)),roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t + italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 0 , italic_t ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) , italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) ) , (3.18)

where Rtsubscript𝑅𝑡R_{t}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the (right) time translation by t0subscript𝑡0t_{0}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which is defined on space-time distributions as an extension of the map Rtf(s,x)=f(s+t,x),subscript𝑅𝑡𝑓𝑠𝑥𝑓𝑠𝑡𝑥R_{t}f(s,x)=f(s+t,x),italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f ( italic_s , italic_x ) = italic_f ( italic_s + italic_t , italic_x ) , for fLloc1(×𝕋2)𝑓subscriptsuperscript𝐿1locsuperscript𝕋2f\in L^{1}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_f ∈ italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_loc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_R × blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ).

(iii) {ΦtN}t0subscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁𝑡0\{\Phi_{t}^{N}\}_{t\geq 0}{ roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ≥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a Markov process and {𝒫tN}t0subscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁𝑡0\{\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N}\}_{t\geq 0}{ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ≥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a Markov semigroup.

In fact, more than Lemma 3.3 (iii) is true; namely, the maps {ΦtN}t0subscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁𝑡0\{\Phi_{t}^{N}\}_{t\geq 0}{ roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ≥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT satisfy the strong Markov property (see [18, Section 4]), but we will not need this extra information in this article.

4. Modified measures and sample path properties

4.1. Modified measures

The Gaussian measure μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in (1.6) can be formally written as

dμs=Zs1eGs(u,v)dudv,𝑑subscript𝜇𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑍𝑠1superscript𝑒subscript𝐺𝑠𝑢𝑣𝑑𝑢𝑑𝑣\displaystyle d\vec{\mu}_{s}=Z_{s}^{-1}e^{-G_{s}(u,v)}dudv,italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u , italic_v ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_u italic_d italic_v ,

where

Gs(u,v):=12𝕋2(sv)2+(s+1u)2dx.assignsubscript𝐺𝑠𝑢𝑣12subscriptsuperscript𝕋2superscriptsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝑣2superscriptsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠1𝑢2𝑑𝑥\displaystyle G_{s}(u,v):=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}(\langle\nabla% \rangle^{s}v)^{2}+(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s+1}u)^{2}dx.italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u , italic_v ) := divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x . (4.1)

Rigorously, we define μs:=Law(𝐮ω)=Law((uω,vω))assignsubscript𝜇𝑠Lawsuperscript𝐮𝜔Lawsuperscript𝑢𝜔superscript𝑣𝜔\vec{\mu}_{s}:=\text{Law}({\mathbf{u}}^{\omega})=\text{Law}((u^{\omega},v^{% \omega}))over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := Law ( bold_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = Law ( ( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ), where (uω,vω)superscript𝑢𝜔superscript𝑣𝜔(u^{\omega},v^{\omega})( italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) denote the following pair of random Fourier series:

uω(x)superscript𝑢𝜔𝑥\displaystyle u^{\omega}(x)italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x ) =n2gn(ω)n2s+2einxandvω(x)=n2hn(ω)n2seinx,formulae-sequenceabsentsubscript𝑛superscript2subscript𝑔𝑛𝜔superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛2𝑠2superscript𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑥andsuperscript𝑣𝜔𝑥subscript𝑛superscript2subscript𝑛𝜔superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛2𝑠superscript𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑥\displaystyle=\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}}\frac{g_{n}(\omega)}{\langle n\rangle^{% 2s+2}}e^{in\cdot x}\quad\text{and}\quad v^{\omega}(x)=\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}% }\frac{h_{n}(\omega)}{\langle n\rangle^{2s}}e^{in\cdot x},= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω ) end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_s + 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i italic_n ⋅ italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_x ) = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω ) end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i italic_n ⋅ italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

where {gn}n2subscriptsubscript𝑔𝑛𝑛superscript2\{g_{n}\}_{n\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}}{ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and {hn}n2subscriptsubscript𝑛𝑛superscript2\{h_{n}\}_{n\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}}{ italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are families of standard complex-valued Gaussian random variables conditioned so that gn=gn¯subscript𝑔𝑛¯subscript𝑔𝑛g_{n}=\overline{g_{-n}}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = over¯ start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG and hn=hn¯subscript𝑛¯subscript𝑛h_{n}=\overline{h_{-n}}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = over¯ start_ARG italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG. More precisely, we define the index set

Λ:=(×+)(+×{0}){(0,0)},assignΛsubscriptsubscript000\displaystyle\Lambda:=(\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}_{+})\cup(\mathbb{Z}_{+}% \times\{0\})\cup\{(0,0)\},roman_Λ := ( blackboard_Z × blackboard_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∪ ( blackboard_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × { 0 } ) ∪ { ( 0 , 0 ) } ,

and let {gn,hn}nΛsubscriptsubscript𝑔𝑛subscript𝑛𝑛Λ\{g_{n},h_{n}\}_{n\in\Lambda}{ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT be standard complex valued Gaussian random variables, with g0,h0subscript𝑔0subscript0g_{0},h_{0}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT real-valued, and then define gn=gn¯subscript𝑔𝑛¯subscript𝑔𝑛g_{-n}=\overline{g_{n}}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = over¯ start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG, hn=hn¯subscript𝑛¯subscript𝑛h_{-n}=\overline{h_{n}}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = over¯ start_ARG italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG for n2𝑛superscript2n\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Given N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we define the marginals

μs,Nsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁\displaystyle\vec{\mu}_{s,N}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT :=(ΠN)μs=Law((ΠNuω,ΠNvω)),assignabsentsubscriptsubscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝜇𝑠LawsubscriptΠabsent𝑁superscript𝑢𝜔subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscript𝑣𝜔\displaystyle:=(\Pi_{\leq N})_{\ast}\vec{\mu}_{s}=\text{Law}((\Pi_{\leq N}u^{% \omega},\Pi_{\leq N}v^{\omega})),:= ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = Law ( ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) , (4.2)
μs,Nsuperscriptsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁perpendicular-to\displaystyle\vec{\mu}_{s,N}^{\perp}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT :=(Π>N)μs=Law((Π>Nuω,Π>Nvω)).assignabsentsubscriptsubscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝜇𝑠LawsubscriptΠabsent𝑁superscript𝑢𝜔subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscript𝑣𝜔\displaystyle:=(\Pi_{>N})_{\ast}\vec{\mu}_{s}=\text{Law}((\Pi_{>N}u^{\omega},% \Pi_{>N}v^{\omega})).:= ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = Law ( ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) . (4.3)

By independence, we then have the decomposition

dμs=dμs,Ndμs,N.𝑑subscript𝜇𝑠tensor-product𝑑subscript𝜇𝑠𝑁𝑑superscriptsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁perpendicular-to\displaystyle d\vec{\mu}_{s}=d\vec{\mu}_{s,N}\otimes d\vec{\mu}_{s,N}^{\perp}.italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (4.4)

We let 𝒱Nsubscript𝒱𝑁\mathcal{V}_{N}caligraphic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT be the real vector space

𝒱N=span{1,cos(nx),sin(nx):nΛN},subscript𝒱𝑁spanconditional-set1𝑛𝑥𝑛𝑥𝑛superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁\displaystyle\mathcal{V}_{N}=\text{span}\{1,\cos(n\cdot x),\sin(n\cdot x):\,n% \in\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}\},caligraphic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = span { 1 , roman_cos ( italic_n ⋅ italic_x ) , roman_sin ( italic_n ⋅ italic_x ) : italic_n ∈ roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ,

where ΛN:={n2: 0<|n|N}ΛassignsuperscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁conditional-set𝑛superscript2 0𝑛𝑁Λ\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}:=\{n\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}\,:\,0<|n|\leq N\}\cap\Lambdaroman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := { italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : 0 < | italic_n | ≤ italic_N } ∩ roman_Λ, and put the usual scalar product on 𝒱Nsubscript𝒱𝑁\mathcal{V}_{N}caligraphic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We endow 𝒱N×𝒱Nsubscript𝒱𝑁subscript𝒱𝑁\mathcal{V}_{N}\times\mathcal{V}_{N}caligraphic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × caligraphic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with a Lebesgue measure LNsubscript𝐿𝑁L_{N}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as follows: with

ΠNu(x)=uN(x)=|n|Nu^neinx,u^n=u^n¯,formulae-sequencesubscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢𝑥subscript𝑢𝑁𝑥subscript𝑛𝑁subscript^𝑢𝑛superscript𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑥subscript^𝑢𝑛¯subscript^𝑢𝑛\displaystyle\Pi_{\leq N}u(x)=u_{N}(x)=\sum_{|n|\leq N}\widehat{u}_{n}e^{in% \cdot x},\quad\widehat{u}_{-n}=\overline{\widehat{u}_{n}},roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ( italic_x ) = italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_n | ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i italic_n ⋅ italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = over¯ start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ,

we put a0=u^(0)subscript𝑎0^𝑢0a_{0}=\widehat{u}(0)italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG ( 0 ), an,1=Reu^nsubscript𝑎𝑛1Resubscript^𝑢𝑛a_{n,1}=\text{Re}\,\widehat{u}_{n}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = Re over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and an,2=Imu^nsubscript𝑎𝑛2Imsubscript^𝑢𝑛a_{n,2}=\text{Im}\,\widehat{u}_{n}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = Im over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT so that

uN(x)=a0+nΛN{an,1 2cos(nx)+an,2(2sin(nx))}.subscript𝑢𝑁𝑥subscript𝑎0subscript𝑛superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁subscript𝑎𝑛12𝑛𝑥subscript𝑎𝑛22𝑛𝑥\displaystyle u_{N}(x)=a_{0}+\sum_{n\in\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}}\{a_{n,1}\,2\cos(n% \cdot x)+a_{n,2}(-2\sin(n\cdot x))\}.italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_cos ( italic_n ⋅ italic_x ) + italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( - 2 roman_sin ( italic_n ⋅ italic_x ) ) } . (4.5)

We then define LNsubscript𝐿𝑁L_{N}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as the Lebesgue measure on 𝒱N×𝒱Nsubscript𝒱𝑁subscript𝒱𝑁\mathcal{V}_{N}\times\mathcal{V}_{N}caligraphic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × caligraphic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with respect to the orthogonal basis

{1,{2cos(nx),2sin(nx)}nΛN}×{1,{2cos(nx),2sin(nx)}nΛN}.1subscript2𝑛𝑥2𝑛𝑥𝑛superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁1subscript2𝑛𝑥2𝑛𝑥𝑛superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁\displaystyle\big{\{}1,\{2\cos(n\cdot x),-2\sin(n\cdot x)\}_{n\in\Lambda_{N}^{% \ast}}\big{\}}\times\big{\{}1,\{2\cos(n\cdot x),-2\sin(n\cdot x)\}_{n\in% \Lambda_{N}^{\ast}}\big{\}}.{ 1 , { 2 roman_cos ( italic_n ⋅ italic_x ) , - 2 roman_sin ( italic_n ⋅ italic_x ) } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } × { 1 , { 2 roman_cos ( italic_n ⋅ italic_x ) , - 2 roman_sin ( italic_n ⋅ italic_x ) } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } .

For every N𝑁N\in\mathbb{N}italic_N ∈ blackboard_N, the Gaussian measure μs,Nsuperscriptsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁perpendicular-to\vec{\mu}_{s,N}^{\perp}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is invariant under the dynamics of the high-frequency equation (3.6). Indeed, a tedious but straightforward computation shows that

𝔼[|{π1𝐮N}(t,n)|2]=n2s2and𝔼[|{π2𝐮N}(t,n)|2]=n2sformulae-sequence𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜋1superscriptsubscript𝐮𝑁perpendicular-to𝑡𝑛2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛2𝑠2and𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜋2superscriptsubscript𝐮𝑁perpendicular-to𝑡𝑛2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛2𝑠\displaystyle\mathbb{E}[|\mathcal{F}\{\pi_{1}{\mathbf{u}}_{N}^{\perp}\}(t,n)|^% {2}]=\langle n\rangle^{-2s-2}\quad\text{and}\quad\mathbb{E}[|\mathcal{F}\{\pi_% {2}{\mathbf{u}}_{N}^{\perp}\}(t,n)|^{2}]=\langle n\rangle^{-2s}blackboard_E [ | caligraphic_F { italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ( italic_t , italic_n ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_s - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and blackboard_E [ | caligraphic_F { italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ( italic_t , italic_n ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

for all t𝑡t\in\mathbb{R}italic_t ∈ blackboard_R, and since 𝐮Nsuperscriptsubscript𝐮𝑁perpendicular-to{\mathbf{u}}_{N}^{\perp}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT evolves linearly, Gaussianity is preserved.

As discussed in [41, 28], it is not clear how to study the quasi-invariance of the measure μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in (1.6) under the nonlinear flow of (1.1) directly. Indeed, a renormalisation is needed to make sense of the time evolution of Gssubscript𝐺𝑠G_{s}italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in (4.1). Thus, following [28], we define

σN:=𝔼μs[𝕋2(sΠNu(x))2𝑑x]=|n|N1n2logN.assignsubscript𝜎𝑁subscript𝔼subscript𝜇𝑠delimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝕋2superscriptsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢𝑥2differential-d𝑥subscriptsubscript𝑛𝑁1superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛2similar-to𝑁\displaystyle\begin{split}\sigma_{N}&:=\mathbb{E}_{\vec{\mu}_{s}}\bigg{[}\int_% {\mathbb{T}^{2}}(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\Pi_{\leq N}u(x))^{2}dx\bigg{]}=\sum_% {|n|_{\infty}\leq N}\frac{1}{\langle n\rangle^{2}}\sim\log N.\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL := blackboard_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ( italic_x ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x ] = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_n | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∼ roman_log italic_N . end_CELL end_ROW (4.6)

Then, we set

Qs,N(u):=(sΠNu)2σN.assignsubscript𝑄𝑠𝑁𝑢superscriptsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢2subscript𝜎𝑁\displaystyle Q_{s,N}(u):=(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\Pi_{\leq N}u)^{2}-\sigma_{% N}.italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) := ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (4.7)

We now define a modified version of (4.1) by

Es,N(u,v)=Gs(ΠNu,ΠNv)+Rs,N(u),subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁𝑢𝑣subscript𝐺𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑣subscript𝑅𝑠𝑁𝑢\displaystyle E_{s,N}(u,v)=G_{s}(\Pi_{\leq N}u,\Pi_{\leq N}v)+R_{s,N}(u),italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u , italic_v ) = italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u , roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v ) + italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) , (4.8)

where

Rs,N(u):=32𝕋2Qs,N(u)(ΠNu)2𝑑x+14𝕋2(ΠNu)4𝑑x.assignsubscript𝑅𝑠𝑁𝑢32subscriptsuperscript𝕋2subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁𝑢superscriptsubscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢2differential-d𝑥14subscriptsuperscript𝕋2superscriptsubscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢4differential-d𝑥\displaystyle R_{s,N}(u):=\frac{3}{2}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}Q_{s,N}(u)(\Pi_{\leq N% }u)^{2}dx+\frac{1}{4}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}(\Pi_{\leq N}u)^{4}dx.italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) := divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x . (4.9)

It follows from Parseval’s theorem that

Es,N(u,v)=s,N(u,v)+HN(u,v),subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁𝑢𝑣subscript𝑠𝑁𝑢𝑣subscript𝐻𝑁𝑢𝑣\displaystyle E_{s,N}(u,v)=\mathcal{E}_{s,N}(u,v)+H_{N}(u,v),italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u , italic_v ) = caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u , italic_v ) + italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u , italic_v ) , (4.10)

where

s,N(u,v)=12𝕋2(m()ΠNu)2+(m()ΠNv)2+32𝕋2Qs,N(u)(ΠNu)2𝑑x,subscript𝑠𝑁𝑢𝑣12subscriptsuperscript𝕋2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑚subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢2superscript𝑚subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑣232subscriptsuperscript𝕋2subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁𝑢superscriptsubscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢2differential-d𝑥\displaystyle\begin{split}\mathcal{E}_{s,N}(u,v)&=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{T}^% {2}}(\langle\nabla\rangle m(\nabla)\Pi_{\leq N}u)^{2}+(m(\nabla)\Pi_{\leq N}v)% ^{2}+\frac{3}{2}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}Q_{s,N}(u)(\Pi_{\leq N}u)^{2}dx,\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u , italic_v ) end_CELL start_CELL = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ italic_m ( ∇ ) roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_m ( ∇ ) roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x , end_CELL end_ROW (4.11)

where m():=2s1assign𝑚superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩2𝑠1m(\nabla):=\sqrt{\langle\nabla\rangle^{2s}-1}italic_m ( ∇ ) := square-root start_ARG ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG, and HNsubscript𝐻𝑁H_{N}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the energy in (3.13).

The following lemma justifies the construction of the modified measures.

Lemma 4.1.

Let s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0 and 1p<1𝑝1\leq p<\infty1 ≤ italic_p < ∞. Then, there exists RsLp(μs)subscript𝑅𝑠superscript𝐿𝑝subscript𝜇𝑠R_{s}\in L^{p}(\vec{\mu}_{s})italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) such that Rs,NRssubscript𝑅𝑠𝑁subscript𝑅𝑠R_{s,N}\to R_{s}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT → italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Lp(μs)superscript𝐿𝑝subscript𝜇𝑠L^{p}(\vec{\mu}_{s})italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) as N𝑁N\to\inftyitalic_N → ∞. Moreover, there exists Cp>0subscript𝐶𝑝0C_{p}>0italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 such that

supNeRs,N(u)Lp(μs)Cp<.subscriptsupremum𝑁subscriptnormsuperscript𝑒subscript𝑅𝑠𝑁𝑢superscript𝐿𝑝subscript𝜇𝑠subscript𝐶𝑝\displaystyle\sup_{N\in\mathbb{N}}\big{\|}e^{-R_{s,N}(u)}\big{\|}_{L^{p}(\vec{% \mu}_{s})}\leq C_{p}<\infty.roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ blackboard_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < ∞ . (4.12)

Furthermore,

limNeRs,N(u,v)eRs(u,v)Lp(μs)=0,subscript𝑁subscriptnormsuperscript𝑒subscript𝑅𝑠𝑁𝑢𝑣superscript𝑒subscript𝑅𝑠𝑢𝑣superscript𝐿𝑝subscript𝜇𝑠0\displaystyle\lim_{N\to\infty}\big{\|}e^{-R_{s,N}(u,v)}-e^{-R_{s}(u,v)}\big{\|% }_{L^{p}(\vec{\mu}_{s})}=0,roman_lim start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N → ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u , italic_v ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u , italic_v ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , (4.13)

and thus, for any σ<s𝜎𝑠\sigma<sitalic_σ < italic_s, the restriction to σ(𝕋2)superscript𝜎superscript𝕋2\mathcal{H}^{\sigma}(\mathbb{T}^{2})caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) of the measures

dνs,N:=Zs,N1eRs,N(u)dμsassign𝑑subscript𝜈𝑠𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑍𝑠𝑁1superscript𝑒subscript𝑅𝑠𝑁𝑢𝑑subscript𝜇𝑠\displaystyle d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}:=Z_{s,N}^{-1}\,e^{-R_{s,N}(u)}d\vec{\mu}_{s}italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (4.14)

converge to a measure

dνs=Zs1eRs(u)dμs𝑑subscript𝜈𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑍𝑠1superscript𝑒subscript𝑅𝑠𝑢𝑑subscript𝜇𝑠\displaystyle d\vec{\nu}_{s}=Z_{s}^{-1}e^{-R_{s}(u)}d\vec{\mu}_{s}italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (4.15)

in total variation, where Zs,N,Zs(0,)subscript𝑍𝑠𝑁subscript𝑍𝑠0Z_{s,N},Z_{s}\in(0,\infty)italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ ( 0 , ∞ ) are defined so that νs,Nsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁\vec{\nu}_{s,N}over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and νssubscript𝜈𝑠\vec{\nu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are probability measures. In particular, νssubscript𝜈𝑠\vec{\nu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are equivalent; that is, νsμsmuch-less-thansubscript𝜈𝑠subscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\nu}_{s}\ll\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and vice versa.

The convergence of {Rs,N}Nsubscriptsubscript𝑅𝑠𝑁𝑁\{R_{s,N}\}_{N\in\mathbb{N}}{ italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ blackboard_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT was essentially proved in [41, Lemma 3.4]. The uniform bound (4.12) is possible in view of the positivity of the term 14u4𝑑x14superscript𝑢4differential-d𝑥\frac{1}{4}\int u^{4}dxdivide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG ∫ italic_u start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x in (4.9). Our proof of Lemma 4.1 is by now a standard application of the Boué-Dupuis variational formula [5, 54, 1]. However, to our knowledge a proof for the whole range s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0 does not appear in the literature, so for the reader’s convenience, we will present some of the details in Section 4.3.

Note that

Zs,N:=eRs,N(u)𝑑μs(u)=eRs,N(uN)𝑑μs,N(uN).assignsubscript𝑍𝑠𝑁superscript𝑒subscript𝑅𝑠𝑁𝑢differential-dsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑢superscript𝑒subscript𝑅𝑠𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁differential-dsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁\displaystyle Z_{s,N}:=\int e^{-R_{s,N}(u)}d\vec{\mu}_{s}(u)=\int e^{-R_{s,N}(% u_{N})}d\mu_{s,N}(u_{N}).italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := ∫ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) = ∫ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) . (4.16)

In particular, by Jensen’s inequality and Lemma 4.1, there is a C>0𝐶0C>0italic_C > 0 such that

infNZs,NC>0.subscriptinfimum𝑁subscript𝑍𝑠𝑁𝐶0\displaystyle\inf_{N\in\mathbb{N}}Z_{s,N}\geq C>0.roman_inf start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ blackboard_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≥ italic_C > 0 . (4.17)

4.2. Pathwise properties

The goal of this section is to establish some properties that sample paths of νssubscript𝜈𝑠\vec{\nu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ξ𝜉\xiitalic_ξ satisfy, building up to the uniform bounds on the truncated flows ΦtNsubscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁𝑡\Phi^{N}_{t}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Lemma 4.4 and Lemma 4.5. We begin with samples of μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which enjoy the following regularity property.

Lemma 4.2.

Let α<s𝛼𝑠\alpha<sitalic_α < italic_s. For 𝐮μssimilar-to𝐮subscript𝜇𝑠{\mathbf{u}}\sim\vec{\mu}_{s}bold_u ∼ over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we have 𝐮Zα𝒞α𝐮superscript𝑍𝛼superscript𝒞𝛼{\mathbf{u}}\in Z^{\alpha}\subset\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}bold_u ∈ italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊂ caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT almost surely. Moreover,

𝔼[supN20{}ΠNΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ)C([0,T];𝒞α)p]C(p,T).𝔼delimited-[]subscriptsupremum𝑁superscript2subscript0superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉𝐶0𝑇superscript𝒞𝛼𝑝𝐶𝑝𝑇\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\bigg{[}\sup_{N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}}\|% \Pi_{\leq N}\Phi_{t}^{\textup{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\|_{C([0,T];\mathcal{% C}^{\alpha})}^{p}\bigg{]}\leq C(p,T).blackboard_E [ roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ } end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ≤ italic_C ( italic_p , italic_T ) . (4.18)
Proof.

Clearly, the membership in Zαsuperscript𝑍𝛼Z^{\alpha}italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is stronger than that in 𝒞αsuperscript𝒞𝛼\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, so we focus on the former. Using Sobolev embedding for some p<𝑝p<\inftyitalic_p < ∞ large enough so that 2p+α<s2𝑝𝛼𝑠\frac{2}{p}+\alpha<sdivide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG + italic_α < italic_s, with qp𝑞𝑝q\geq pitalic_q ≥ italic_p, Lemma 2.8, we have

𝔼[𝐮Zαq]𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnorm𝐮superscript𝑍𝛼𝑞\displaystyle\mathbb{E}[\|{\mathbf{u}}\|_{Z^{\alpha}}^{q}]blackboard_E [ ∥ bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] j=0ej8𝔼[supt[j,j+1]S(t)𝐮𝒲α+2p,pq]less-than-or-similar-toabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0superscript𝑒𝑗8𝔼delimited-[]subscriptsupremum𝑡𝑗𝑗1superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑆𝑡𝐮superscript𝒲𝛼2𝑝𝑝𝑞\displaystyle\lesssim\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}e^{\frac{j}{8}}\mathbb{E}\Big{[}\sup_{% t\in[j,j+1]}\|S(t){\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{W}^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p},p}}^{q}\Big{]}≲ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_j end_ARG start_ARG 8 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_E [ roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ [ italic_j , italic_j + 1 ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ]
j=0ej8{𝔼[S(j)𝐮𝒲α+2p,pq]+supjt<tj+1𝔼[S(t)𝐮S(t)𝐮𝒲α+2p,pq|tt|1+γq+ε]},less-than-or-similar-toabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑗0superscript𝑒𝑗8𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑆𝑗𝐮superscript𝒲𝛼2𝑝𝑝𝑞subscriptsupremum𝑗superscript𝑡𝑡𝑗1𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑆𝑡𝐮𝑆superscript𝑡𝐮superscript𝒲𝛼2𝑝𝑝𝑞superscript𝑡superscript𝑡1𝛾𝑞𝜀\displaystyle\lesssim\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}e^{\frac{j}{8}}\bigg{\{}\mathbb{E}\Big% {[}\|S(j){\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{W}^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p},p}}^{q}\Big{]}+\sup_{% j\leq t^{\prime}<t\leq j+1}\mathbb{E}\bigg{[}\frac{\|S(t){\mathbf{u}}-S(t^{% \prime}){\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{W}^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p},p}}^{q}}{|t-t^{\prime}% |^{1+\gamma q+\varepsilon}}\bigg{]}\bigg{\}},≲ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_j end_ARG start_ARG 8 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT { blackboard_E [ ∥ italic_S ( italic_j ) bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] + roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j ≤ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < italic_t ≤ italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_E [ divide start_ARG ∥ italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u - italic_S ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_γ italic_q + italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] } ,

for some γ>0𝛾0\gamma>0italic_γ > 0 to chosen later. It will suffice to control the norms of just the first components of the vectors. For each fixed x𝕋2𝑥superscript𝕋2x\in\mathbb{T}^{2}italic_x ∈ blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, α+2pπ1S(j)𝐮(x)superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝛼2𝑝subscript𝜋1𝑆𝑗𝐮𝑥\langle\nabla\rangle^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p}}\pi_{1}S(j){\mathbf{u}}(x)⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_j ) bold_u ( italic_x ) is a mean zero Gaussian random variable with a variance bounded by

Var(α+2pπ1S(j)𝐮(x))ejnn2α+4pn2+2sej.less-than-or-similar-toVarsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝛼2𝑝subscript𝜋1𝑆𝑗𝐮𝑥superscript𝑒𝑗subscript𝑛superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛2𝛼4𝑝superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛22𝑠less-than-or-similar-tosuperscript𝑒𝑗\displaystyle\text{Var}(\langle\nabla\rangle^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p}}\pi_{1}S(j){% \mathbf{u}}(x))\lesssim e^{-j}\sum_{n}\frac{\langle n\rangle^{2\alpha+\frac{4}% {p}}}{\langle n\rangle^{2+2s}}\lesssim e^{-j}.Var ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_j ) bold_u ( italic_x ) ) ≲ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_α + divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 + 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ≲ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (4.19)

By Minkowski’s inequality, the Gaussianity of α+2pπ1S(j)𝐮(x)superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝛼2𝑝subscript𝜋1𝑆𝑗𝐮𝑥\langle\nabla\rangle^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p}}\pi_{1}S(j){\mathbf{u}}(x)⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_j ) bold_u ( italic_x ) and (4.19),

𝔼[π1S(j)𝐮Wα+2p,pq]1q𝔼[|α+2pπ1S(j)𝐮(x)|q]1qLxpej2q12.𝔼superscriptdelimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝜋1𝑆𝑗𝐮superscript𝑊𝛼2𝑝𝑝𝑞1𝑞subscriptnorm𝔼superscriptdelimited-[]superscriptsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝛼2𝑝subscript𝜋1𝑆𝑗𝐮𝑥𝑞1𝑞subscriptsuperscript𝐿𝑝𝑥less-than-or-similar-tosuperscript𝑒𝑗2superscript𝑞12\displaystyle\mathbb{E}[\|\pi_{1}S(j){\mathbf{u}}\|_{W^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p},p}}% ^{q}]^{\frac{1}{q}}\leq\bigg{\|}\mathbb{E}[|\langle\nabla\rangle^{\alpha+\frac% {2}{p}}\pi_{1}S(j){\mathbf{u}}(x)|^{q}]^{\frac{1}{q}}\bigg{\|}_{L^{p}_{x}}% \lesssim e^{-\frac{j}{2}}q^{\frac{1}{2}}.blackboard_E [ ∥ italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_j ) bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_q end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ ∥ blackboard_E [ | ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_j ) bold_u ( italic_x ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_q end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_j end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

The factor ej/2superscript𝑒𝑗2e^{-j/2}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ensures the summability of the first term in j𝑗jitalic_j. For the second term we argue similarly using the mean value theorem to see that for each fixed x𝕋2𝑥superscript𝕋2x\in\mathbb{T}^{2}italic_x ∈ blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, α+2pπ1S(t)𝐮(x)α+2pπ1S(t)𝐮(x)superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝛼2𝑝subscript𝜋1𝑆𝑡𝐮𝑥superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝛼2𝑝subscript𝜋1𝑆superscript𝑡𝐮𝑥\langle\nabla\rangle^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p}}\pi_{1}S(t){\mathbf{u}}(x)-\langle% \nabla\rangle^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p}}\pi_{1}S(t^{\prime}){\mathbf{u}}(x)⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u ( italic_x ) - ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) bold_u ( italic_x ) is a mean zero Gaussian random variable with variance bounded by

ejnn2θ+2α+4p|tt|2θn2+2sej|tt|2θ,less-than-or-similar-tosuperscript𝑒𝑗subscript𝑛superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛2𝜃2𝛼4𝑝superscript𝑡superscript𝑡2𝜃superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛22𝑠superscript𝑒𝑗superscript𝑡superscript𝑡2𝜃\displaystyle e^{-j}\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}\frac{\langle n\rangle^{2\theta+2% \alpha+\frac{4}{p}}|t-t^{\prime}|^{2\theta}}{\langle n\rangle^{2+2s}}\lesssim e% ^{-j}|t-t^{\prime}|^{2\theta},italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_θ + 2 italic_α + divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 + 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ≲ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

provided that 0<θ<min(1,sα2p)0𝜃1𝑠𝛼2𝑝0<\theta<\min(1,s-\alpha-\frac{2}{p})0 < italic_θ < roman_min ( 1 , italic_s - italic_α - divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG ). Thus,

supjt<tj+1𝔼[S(t)𝐮S(t)𝐮𝒲α+2p,pq|tt|1+γq+ε]eqj2qq2,less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptsupremum𝑗superscript𝑡𝑡𝑗1𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑆𝑡𝐮𝑆superscript𝑡𝐮superscript𝒲𝛼2𝑝𝑝𝑞superscript𝑡superscript𝑡1𝛾𝑞𝜀superscript𝑒𝑞𝑗2superscript𝑞𝑞2\displaystyle\sup_{j\leq t^{\prime}<t\leq j+1}\mathbb{E}\bigg{[}\frac{\|S(t){% \mathbf{u}}-S(t^{\prime}){\mathbf{u}}\|_{\mathcal{W}^{\alpha+\frac{2}{p},p}}^{% q}}{|t-t^{\prime}|^{1+\gamma q+\varepsilon}}\bigg{]}\lesssim e^{-q\frac{j}{2}}% q^{\frac{q}{2}},roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j ≤ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < italic_t ≤ italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_E [ divide start_ARG ∥ italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u - italic_S ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG , italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_γ italic_q + italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] ≲ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_q divide start_ARG italic_j end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_q end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

provided that γ<θ1qεq𝛾𝜃1𝑞𝜀𝑞\gamma<\theta-\frac{1}{q}-\frac{\varepsilon}{q}italic_γ < italic_θ - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_q end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG italic_q end_ARG which is possible by taking q𝑞qitalic_q sufficiently large and ε𝜀\varepsilonitalic_ε sufficiently small at the beginning. We then obtain

𝔼[𝐮Zαq]q12.less-than-or-similar-to𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnorm𝐮superscript𝑍𝛼𝑞superscript𝑞12\displaystyle\mathbb{E}[\|{\mathbf{u}}\|_{Z^{\alpha}}^{q}]\lesssim q^{\frac{1}% {2}}.blackboard_E [ ∥ bold_u ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ≲ italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

As for (4.18), this follows in a similar way as for (2.40). In particular, by (3.8) and the triangle inequality, we only need to prove the bound for S(t)𝐮0𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{0}italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which further reduces to showing

𝔼[Π1S(t)𝐮0C([0,T];𝒞α)p]𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent1𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0𝐶0𝑇superscript𝒞𝛼𝑝\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\big{[}\|\Pi_{\leq 1}S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{0}\|_{C([0,T];% \mathcal{C}^{\alpha})}^{p}\big{]}blackboard_E [ ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] p,T1,subscriptless-than-or-similar-to𝑝𝑇absent1\displaystyle\lesssim_{p,T}1,≲ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , (4.20)
𝔼[Π2MS(t)𝐮0ΠMS(t)𝐮0C([0,T];𝒞α)p]𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent2𝑀𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0subscriptΠabsent𝑀𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0𝐶0𝑇superscript𝒞𝛼𝑝\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\big{[}\|\Pi_{\leq 2M}S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{0}-\Pi_{\leq M}% S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{0}\|_{C([0,T];\mathcal{C}^{\alpha})}^{p}]blackboard_E [ ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 2 italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] p,TMθsubscriptless-than-or-similar-to𝑝𝑇absentsuperscript𝑀𝜃\displaystyle\lesssim_{p,T}M^{-\theta}≲ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (4.21)

for some θ>0𝜃0\theta>0italic_θ > 0, and every M20𝑀superscript2subscript0M\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_M ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Here, (4.20) just follows from Sobolev embedding and (2.1). Now, (4.21) follows similar arguments as above in showing 𝐮0Zαsubscript𝐮0superscript𝑍𝛼{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\in Z^{\alpha}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and we gain the factor Mθsuperscript𝑀𝜃M^{-\theta}italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT from localisation to frequencies around M𝑀Mitalic_M in the sum (4.19). ∎

As our arguments in Section 5.3 require us to also control norms of the time evolution of the function Qs,N(u)subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁𝑢Q_{s,N}(u)italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ), we need to be more precise here about this quantity. For uCα(𝕋2)𝑢superscript𝐶𝛼superscript𝕋2u\in C^{\alpha}(\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_u ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), we define

Qs(u):=limNQs,N(u)assignsubscript𝑄𝑠𝑢subscript𝑁subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁𝑢\displaystyle Q_{s}(u):=\lim_{N\to\infty}Q_{s,N}(u)italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) := roman_lim start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N → ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) (4.22)

in Hαs(𝕋2)superscript𝐻𝛼𝑠superscript𝕋2H^{\alpha-s}(\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), whenever this limit exists.

Lemma 4.3.

Let α<s𝛼𝑠\alpha<sitalic_α < italic_s but sufficiently close to s𝑠sitalic_s. Suppose that uCα(𝕋2)𝑢superscript𝐶𝛼superscript𝕋2u\in C^{\alpha}(\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_u ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is such that Qs(u)subscript𝑄𝑠𝑢Q_{s}(u)italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) exists in the sense of (4.22), and let wH1+α(𝕋2)𝑤superscript𝐻1𝛼superscript𝕋2w\in H^{1+\alpha}(\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_w ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). Then, Qs(u+w)subscript𝑄𝑠𝑢𝑤Q_{s}(u+w)italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u + italic_w ) exists in the sense of (4.22) and satisfies

Qs(u+w)=Qs(u)+2(su)(sw)+(sw)2.subscript𝑄𝑠𝑢𝑤subscript𝑄𝑠𝑢2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝑢superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝑤superscriptsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝑤2\displaystyle Q_{s}(u+w)=Q_{s}(u)+2(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}u)(\langle\nabla% \rangle^{s}w)+(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}w)^{2}.italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u + italic_w ) = italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) + 2 ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u ) ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w ) + ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (4.23)

In particular, if u𝑢uitalic_u is distributed according to μs+1subscript𝜇𝑠1\mu_{s+1}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, then almost surely Qs(u)subscript𝑄𝑠𝑢Q_{s}(u)italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) exists, and moreover, Qs(u)Cε(𝕋2)subscript𝑄𝑠𝑢superscript𝐶𝜀superscript𝕋2Q_{s}(u)\in C^{-\varepsilon}(\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) for any ε>sα𝜀𝑠𝛼\varepsilon>s-\alphaitalic_ε > italic_s - italic_α, and Qs,N(u)Qs(u)subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁𝑢subscript𝑄𝑠𝑢Q_{s,N}(u)\to Q_{s}(u)italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) → italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) in Cε(𝕋2)superscript𝐶𝜀superscript𝕋2C^{-\varepsilon}(\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). Finally, for 𝐮0subscript𝐮0{\mathbf{u}}_{0}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distributed according to μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Qs(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))subscript𝑄𝑠subscript𝜋1superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉Q_{s}(\pi_{1}\Phi_{t}^{\textup{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) exists almost surely and satisfies

𝔼[supN20{}Qs,N(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))C([0,T];Hσ)p]C(T,p).𝔼delimited-[]subscriptsupremum𝑁superscript2subscript0superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝜋1superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉𝐶0𝑇superscript𝐻𝜎𝑝𝐶𝑇𝑝\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\bigg{[}\sup_{N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}}\|Q% _{s,N}(\pi_{1}\Phi_{t}^{\textup{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))\|_{C([0,T];H^{-% \sigma})}^{p}\bigg{]}\leq C(T,p).blackboard_E [ roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ } end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ≤ italic_C ( italic_T , italic_p ) . (4.24)

for any 1p<1𝑝1\leq p<\infty1 ≤ italic_p < ∞, σ>0𝜎0\sigma>0italic_σ > 0, and where ΦtlinsuperscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡lin\Phi_{t}^{\textup{lin}}roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the linear flow defined in (3.7).

Proof.

For each fixed N𝑁N\in\mathbb{N}italic_N ∈ blackboard_N, it follows by the definition (4.7) that

Qs,N(u+w)=Qs,N(u)+2(sΠNu)(sΠNw)+(sΠNw)2.subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁𝑢𝑤subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁𝑢2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑤superscriptsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑤2\displaystyle Q_{s,N}(u+w)=Q_{s,N}(u)+2(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\Pi_{\leq N}u)% (\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\Pi_{\leq N}w)+(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\Pi_{\leq N}w% )^{2}.italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u + italic_w ) = italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) + 2 ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w ) + ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (4.25)

Then, the existence of Qs(u+w)subscript𝑄𝑠𝑢𝑤Q_{s}(u+w)italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u + italic_w ) is ensured by verifying that the right hand side of (4.25) converges as N𝑁N\to\inftyitalic_N → ∞. The term Qs,N(u)subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁𝑢Q_{s,N}(u)italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u ) converges by our assumption on u𝑢uitalic_u. For the mixed term (sΠNu)(sΠNw)superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑢superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑤(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\Pi_{\leq N}u)(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\Pi_{\leq N}w)( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u ) ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w ), we use (2.17) which is controlled provided that 1+αs>sα1𝛼𝑠𝑠𝛼1+\alpha-s>s-\alpha1 + italic_α - italic_s > italic_s - italic_α, which holds as long as α<s𝛼𝑠\alpha<sitalic_α < italic_s is sufficiently close to s𝑠sitalic_s. Similarly, (sΠNw)2superscriptsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑤2(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\Pi_{\leq N}w)^{2}( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT converges to (sw)2superscriptsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠𝑤2(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}w)^{2}( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_w ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in Hαssuperscript𝐻𝛼𝑠H^{\alpha-s}italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, as long as 1+αs>sα1𝛼𝑠𝑠𝛼1+\alpha-s>s-\alpha1 + italic_α - italic_s > italic_s - italic_α.

The second claim regarding functions u𝑢uitalic_u distributed according to μs+1subscript𝜇𝑠1\mu_{s+1}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is essentially shown in [28, (4.6), Proposition 4.3] and the required details are already encapsulated in showing (4.24), which we move onto now.

By a telescoping series argument, it is enough to show that

𝔼[Qs,1(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))C([0,T];Hσ)p]𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝑄𝑠1subscript𝜋1subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐶0𝑇superscript𝐻𝜎𝑝\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\big{[}\|Q_{s,1}(\pi_{1}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf{% u}}_{0},\xi))\|_{C([0,T];H^{-\sigma})}^{p}\big{]}blackboard_E [ ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] p,T1,subscriptless-than-or-similar-to𝑝𝑇absent1\displaystyle\lesssim_{p,T}1,≲ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , (4.26)
𝔼[Qs,2M(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))Qs,M(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))C([0,T];Hσ)p]𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝑄𝑠2𝑀subscript𝜋1subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript𝑄𝑠𝑀subscript𝜋1subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐶0𝑇superscript𝐻𝜎𝑝\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\big{[}\|Q_{s,2M}(\pi_{1}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf% {u}}_{0},\xi))-Q_{s,M}(\pi_{1}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))\|_{% C([0,T];H^{-\sigma})}^{p}]blackboard_E [ ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , 2 italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) - italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] p,TMδsubscriptless-than-or-similar-to𝑝𝑇absentsuperscript𝑀𝛿\displaystyle\lesssim_{p,T}M^{-\delta}≲ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p , italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (4.27)

for 1p<1𝑝1\leq p<\infty1 ≤ italic_p < ∞ and some δ>0𝛿0\delta>0italic_δ > 0. In particular, (4.27) also establishes that the sequence {Qs(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))}Nsubscriptsubscript𝑄𝑠subscript𝜋1superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉𝑁\{Q_{s}(\pi_{1}\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))\}_{N}{ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is Cauchy in this sense and thus Qs(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))subscript𝑄𝑠subscript𝜋1superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉Q_{s}(\pi_{1}\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) exists in Lp(Ω;C([0,T];Hσ))superscript𝐿𝑝Ω𝐶0𝑇superscript𝐻𝜎L^{p}(\Omega;C([0,T];H^{-\sigma}))italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( roman_Ω ; italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ). We only consider (4.27) as simpler arguments suffice for (4.26).

By Lemma 2.8, we have

𝔼[Qs,2M(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))Qs,M(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))C([j,j+1];Hσ)p]𝔼[𝒬s,M(t)Hσp]+supjt<tj+1𝔼[𝒬s,M(t)𝒬s,M(t)Hσp|tt|1+pγ+ε],less-than-or-similar-to𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑄𝑠2𝑀subscript𝜋1subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript𝑄𝑠𝑀subscript𝜋1subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐶𝑗𝑗1superscript𝐻𝜎𝑝𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝒬𝑠𝑀𝑡superscript𝐻𝜎𝑝subscriptsupremum𝑗superscript𝑡𝑡𝑗1𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝒬𝑠𝑀𝑡subscript𝒬𝑠𝑀superscript𝑡superscript𝐻𝜎𝑝superscript𝑡superscript𝑡1𝑝𝛾𝜀\displaystyle\begin{split}&\mathbb{E}\big{[}\|Q_{s,2M}(\pi_{1}\Phi^{\text{lin}% }_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))-Q_{s,M}(\pi_{1}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}% _{0},\xi))\|_{C([j,j+1];H^{-\sigma})}^{p}]\\ &\lesssim\mathbb{E}\big{[}\|\mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t)\|_{H^{-\sigma}}^{p}]+\sup_{j% \leq t^{\prime}<t\leq j+1}\mathbb{E}\bigg{[}\frac{\|\mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t)-% \mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t^{\prime})\|_{H^{-\sigma}}^{p}}{|t-t^{\prime}|^{1+p\gamma+% \varepsilon}}\bigg{]},\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL blackboard_E [ ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , 2 italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) - italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ italic_j , italic_j + 1 ] ; italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≲ blackboard_E [ ∥ caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] + roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j ≤ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < italic_t ≤ italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_E [ divide start_ARG ∥ caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) - caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_p italic_γ + italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] , end_CELL end_ROW (4.28)

where γ<θ1+εp𝛾𝜃1𝜀𝑝\gamma<\theta-\frac{1+\varepsilon}{p}italic_γ < italic_θ - divide start_ARG 1 + italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG, for some 0<θ<10𝜃10<\theta<10 < italic_θ < 1, and

𝒬s,M(t):=Qs,2M(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))Qs,M(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ)).assignsubscript𝒬𝑠𝑀𝑡subscript𝑄𝑠2𝑀subscript𝜋1subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript𝑄𝑠𝑀subscript𝜋1subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉\mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t):=Q_{s,2M}(\pi_{1}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},% \xi))-Q_{s,M}(\pi_{1}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)).caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) := italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , 2 italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) - italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) .

For each fixed t0𝑡0t\geq 0italic_t ≥ 0, the law of Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ)superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) is μssubscript𝜇𝑠\vec{\mu}_{s}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, so then

𝔼[𝒬s,M(j)Hσ2]𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝒬𝑠𝑀𝑗superscript𝐻𝜎2\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\Big{[}\|\mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(j)\|_{H^{-\sigma}}^{2}\Big{]}blackboard_E [ ∥ caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_j ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] =𝔼[𝒬s,M(0)Hσ2]absent𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝒬𝑠𝑀0superscript𝐻𝜎2\displaystyle=\mathbb{E}\Big{[}\|\mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(0)\|_{H^{-\sigma}}^{2}\Big{]}= blackboard_E [ ∥ caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 0 ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ]
n01n2σn=n1+n2j{1,2},|nj|Mj=121n12n22+M<|n|2M1n4less-than-or-similar-toabsentsubscript𝑛01superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛2𝜎subscript𝑛subscript𝑛1subscript𝑛2formulae-sequence𝑗12similar-tosubscript𝑛𝑗𝑀superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗121superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑛12superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑛22subscript𝑀𝑛2𝑀1superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛4\displaystyle\lesssim\sum_{n\neq 0}\frac{1}{\langle n\rangle^{2\sigma}}\sum_{% \begin{subarray}{c}n=n_{1}+n_{2}\\ \exists j\in\{1,2\},|n_{j}|\sim M\end{subarray}}\prod_{j=1}^{2}\frac{1}{% \langle n_{1}\rangle^{2}\langle n_{2}\rangle^{2}}+\sum_{M<|n|\leq 2M}\frac{1}{% \langle n\rangle^{4}}≲ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ≠ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_n = italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ∃ italic_j ∈ { 1 , 2 } , | italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ∼ italic_M end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M < | italic_n | ≤ 2 italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG
(logM)M2σ+M2,less-than-or-similar-toabsent𝑀superscript𝑀2𝜎superscript𝑀2\displaystyle\lesssim(\log M)M^{-2\sigma}+M^{-2},≲ ( roman_log italic_M ) italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

which is acceptable as σ>0𝜎0\sigma>0italic_σ > 0. The Wiener Chaos estimate (see [46, Theorem I.22] and [49, Proposition 2.4]) then implies a similar result for any finite p>2𝑝2p>2italic_p > 2. Moreover, by the Wiener Chaos estimate, for the second term in (4.28), it is enough to show that

𝔼[𝒬s,M(t)𝒬s,M(t)Hσ2]|tt|2θ,less-than-or-similar-to𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝒬𝑠𝑀𝑡subscript𝒬𝑠𝑀superscript𝑡superscript𝐻𝜎2superscript𝑡superscript𝑡2𝜃\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\Big{[}\|\mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t)-\mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t^{% \prime})\|_{H^{-\sigma}}^{2}\Big{]}\lesssim|t-t^{\prime}|^{2\theta},blackboard_E [ ∥ caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) - caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ≲ | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (4.29)

where γ<θ1+εp𝛾𝜃1𝜀𝑝\gamma<\theta-\frac{1+\varepsilon}{p}italic_γ < italic_θ - divide start_ARG 1 + italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG and for some 0<θ<10𝜃10<\theta<10 < italic_θ < 1. By expanding the definition of the Hσsuperscript𝐻𝜎H^{-\sigma}italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_σ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT norm, (4.29) follows from

𝔼[|{𝒬s,M(t)𝒬s,M(t)}(n)|2]|tt|2θn2+2θ+2δMδ,less-than-or-similar-to𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝒬𝑠𝑀𝑡subscript𝒬𝑠𝑀superscript𝑡𝑛2superscript𝑡superscript𝑡2𝜃superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑛22𝜃2𝛿superscript𝑀𝛿\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\Big{[}\big{|}\mathcal{F}\{\mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t)-% \mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t^{\prime})\}(n)\big{|}^{2}\Big{]}\lesssim|t-t^{\prime}|^{2% \theta}\langle n\rangle^{-2+2\theta+2\delta}M^{-\delta},blackboard_E [ | caligraphic_F { caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) - caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) } ( italic_n ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ≲ | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 + 2 italic_θ + 2 italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (4.30)

for any n𝑛n\in\mathbb{Z}italic_n ∈ blackboard_Z. We compute

{𝒬s,M(t)}(n)=n=n1+n2n0j{1,2},|nj|Mj=12z(t,nj)nj+𝟏{n=0}M<|m|2M|z(t,m)|21m2subscript𝒬𝑠𝑀𝑡𝑛subscript𝑛subscript𝑛1subscript𝑛2𝑛0formulae-sequence𝑗12similar-tosubscript𝑛𝑗𝑀superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗12𝑧𝑡subscript𝑛𝑗delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑛𝑗subscript1𝑛0subscript𝑀𝑚2𝑀superscript𝑧𝑡𝑚21superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑚2\displaystyle\begin{split}\mathcal{F}\{\mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t)\}(n)&=\sum_{\begin% {subarray}{c}n=n_{1}+n_{2}\\ n\neq 0\\ \exists j\in\{1,2\},|n_{j}|\sim M\end{subarray}}\prod_{j=1}^{2}\frac{z(t,n_{j}% )}{\langle n_{j}\rangle}+\mathbf{1}_{\{n=0\}}\sum_{M<|m|\leq 2M}\frac{|z(t,m)|% ^{2}-1}{\langle m\rangle^{2}}\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL caligraphic_F { caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) } ( italic_n ) end_CELL start_CELL = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_n = italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_n ≠ 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ∃ italic_j ∈ { 1 , 2 } , | italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ∼ italic_M end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_z ( italic_t , italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ end_ARG + bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT { italic_n = 0 } end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M < | italic_m | ≤ 2 italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG | italic_z ( italic_t , italic_m ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_m ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW (4.31)

where

z(t,n):=et2((cos(t[n])+sin(t[n])2[n])gn\displaystyle z(t,n):=e^{-\frac{t}{2}}\bigg{(}(\cos(t[n])+\tfrac{\sin(t[n])}{2% [n]})g_{n}italic_z ( italic_t , italic_n ) := italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_t end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ( roman_cos ( italic_t [ italic_n ] ) + divide start_ARG roman_sin ( italic_t [ italic_n ] ) end_ARG start_ARG 2 [ italic_n ] end_ARG ) italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT +n[n]sin(t[n])hndelimited-⟨⟩𝑛delimited-[]𝑛𝑡delimited-[]𝑛subscript𝑛\displaystyle+\tfrac{\langle n\rangle}{[n]}\sin(t[n])h_{n}+ divide start_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_n ] end_ARG roman_sin ( italic_t [ italic_n ] ) italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
+2n[n]0tet2sin((tt)[n])dβn(t)).\displaystyle+\tfrac{\sqrt{2}\langle n\rangle}{[n]}\int_{0}^{t}e^{\frac{t^{% \prime}}{2}}\sin((t-t^{\prime})[n])d\beta_{n}(t^{\prime})\bigg{)}.+ divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ⟨ italic_n ⟩ end_ARG start_ARG [ italic_n ] end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_sin ( ( italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) [ italic_n ] ) italic_d italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) .

Then, taking the difference of the first term in (4.31) at times jt<tj+1𝑗superscript𝑡𝑡𝑗1j\leq t^{\prime}<t\leq j+1italic_j ≤ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < italic_t ≤ italic_j + 1, with the absolute value squared, and using the mean value theorem, we find

n=n1+n2max(|n1|,|n2|)Mmax(n1,n2)2θn12n22|tt|2θ|tt|2θn2+2θ+2δMδ,\displaystyle\begin{split}\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}n=n_{1}+n_{2}\\ \max(|n_{1}|,|n_{2}|)\sim M\end{subarray}}\frac{\max(\langle n_{1}\rangle,% \langle n_{2}\rangle)^{2\theta}}{\langle n_{1}\rangle^{2}\langle n_{2}\rangle^% {2}}|t-t^{\prime}|^{2\theta}&\lesssim|t-t^{\prime}|^{2\theta}\langle n\rangle^% {-2+2\theta+2\delta}M^{-\delta},\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_n = italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL roman_max ( | italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | , | italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ) ∼ italic_M end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG roman_max ( ⟨ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ , ⟨ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ≲ | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ italic_n ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 + 2 italic_θ + 2 italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_δ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , end_CELL end_ROW (4.32)

provided that 0<θ<10𝜃10<\theta<10 < italic_θ < 1. When n=0𝑛0n=0italic_n = 0, we need to use that fact that for each fixed t0𝑡0t\geq 0italic_t ≥ 0 and m𝑚m\in\mathbb{Z}italic_m ∈ blackboard_Z, z(t,m)𝑧𝑡𝑚z(t,m)italic_z ( italic_t , italic_m ) is a standard complex Gaussian random variable so

|z(t,m)|21=|z(t,m)|2𝔼[|z(t,m)|2].superscript𝑧𝑡𝑚21superscript𝑧𝑡𝑚2𝔼delimited-[]superscript𝑧𝑡𝑚2\displaystyle|z(t,m)|^{2}-1=|z(t,m)|^{2}-\mathbb{E}[|z(t,m)|^{2}].| italic_z ( italic_t , italic_m ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 = | italic_z ( italic_t , italic_m ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - blackboard_E [ | italic_z ( italic_t , italic_m ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] .

Then, (4.30) follows in this case since

𝔼[(|z(t,m1)|2|z(t,m1)|2)\displaystyle\mathbb{E}[(|z(t,m_{1})|^{2}-|z(t^{\prime},m_{1})|^{2})blackboard_E [ ( | italic_z ( italic_t , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_z ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) (|z(t,m2)|2|z(t,m2)|2)]\displaystyle(|z(t,m_{2})|^{2}-|z(t^{\prime},m_{2})|^{2})]( | italic_z ( italic_t , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_z ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ]
=δm1,m2𝔼[(|z(t,m1)|2|z(t,m1)|2)2],absentsubscript𝛿subscript𝑚1subscript𝑚2𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsuperscript𝑧𝑡subscript𝑚12superscript𝑧superscript𝑡subscript𝑚122\displaystyle=\delta_{m_{1},m_{2}}\mathbb{E}[(|z(t,m_{1})|^{2}-|z(t^{\prime},m% _{1})|^{2})^{2}],= italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_E [ ( | italic_z ( italic_t , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - | italic_z ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ,

and thus

𝔼[|{𝒬s,M(t)𝒬s,M(t)}(0)|2]|tt|2θ|m|M1m42θ|tt|2θM2+2θless-than-or-similar-to𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝒬𝑠𝑀𝑡subscript𝒬𝑠𝑀superscript𝑡02superscript𝑡superscript𝑡2𝜃subscriptsimilar-to𝑚𝑀1superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑚42𝜃less-than-or-similar-tosuperscript𝑡superscript𝑡2𝜃superscript𝑀22𝜃\displaystyle\mathbb{E}\Big{[}\big{|}\mathcal{F}\{\mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t)-% \mathcal{Q}_{s,M}(t^{\prime})\}(0)\big{|}^{2}\Big{]}\lesssim|t-t^{\prime}|^{2% \theta}\sum_{|m|\sim M}\frac{1}{\langle m\rangle^{4-2\theta}}\lesssim|t-t^{% \prime}|^{2\theta}M^{-2+2\theta}blackboard_E [ | caligraphic_F { caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) - caligraphic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) } ( 0 ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ≲ | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_m | ∼ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ⟨ italic_m ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 - 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ≲ | italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 + 2 italic_θ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

for any 0<θ<10𝜃10<\theta<10 < italic_θ < 1. This completes the proof of (4.30) and thus also (4.29). ∎

We now show that (4.18) and (4.24) also hold for the nonlinear flow ΦtsubscriptΦ𝑡\Phi_{t}roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of (1.1). To this end, we need to exploit that 𝐰𝐰{\mathbf{w}}bold_w belongs to the higher regularity space 1+sεsuperscript1𝑠𝜀\mathcal{H}^{1+s-\varepsilon}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for any ε>0𝜀0\varepsilon>0italic_ε > 0, namely, one full degree better than that of the initial data 𝐮0subscript𝐮0{\mathbf{u}}_{0}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the stochastic convolution \@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)[4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ). It is convenient to verify this a posteriori relative to the results from Proposition 3.1. In particular, the following results hold pathwise.

Lemma 4.4.

Let 0<α<α<s0superscript𝛼𝛼𝑠0<\alpha^{\prime}<\alpha<s0 < italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < italic_α < italic_s, T>0𝑇0T>0italic_T > 0, and 𝐮0Xαsubscript𝐮0superscript𝑋𝛼{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\in X^{\alpha}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Then, for every N20{}𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ }, 𝐰N(t)C([0,T];1+α(𝕋2))subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡𝐶0𝑇superscript1𝛼superscript𝕋2{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)\in C([0,T];\mathcal{H}^{1+\alpha}(\mathbb{T}^{2}))bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∈ italic_C ( [ 0 , italic_T ] ; caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ), and whenever

supN20{}supt[0,T](ΠNΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ)𝒲α,2α+ΠN\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)Zα)Rsubscriptsupremum𝑁superscript2subscript0subscriptsupremum𝑡0𝑇subscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉superscript𝒲𝛼2𝛼subscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉superscript𝑍𝛼𝑅\displaystyle\sup_{N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}}\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\Big{% (}\|\Pi_{\leq N}\Phi_{t}^{\textup{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\|_{\mathcal{W}^{% \alpha,\frac{2}{\alpha}}}+\|\Pi_{\leq N}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{% \leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\|_{Z^{\alpha}}\Big{)}\leq Rroman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ } end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_T ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α , divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_α end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ≤ italic_R (4.33)

for some R>0𝑅0R>0italic_R > 0, there exists C(T,R)>0𝐶𝑇𝑅0C(T,R)>0italic_C ( italic_T , italic_R ) > 0 such that

supN,M20{}supt[0,T]{ΠM𝐰N(t)𝒞α+𝐰N(t)1+α}C(T,R).subscriptsupremum𝑁𝑀superscript2subscript0subscriptsupremum𝑡0𝑇subscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent𝑀subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡superscript𝒞superscript𝛼subscriptnormsubscript𝐰𝑁𝑡superscript1𝛼𝐶𝑇𝑅\displaystyle\sup_{N,M\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}}\sup_{t\in[0,T]}% \Big{\{}\|\Pi_{\leq M}{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)\|_{\mathcal{C}^{\alpha^{\prime}}}+\|% {\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)\|_{\mathcal{H}^{1+\alpha}}\Big{\}}\leq C(T,R).roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N , italic_M ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ } end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_T ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ≤ italic_C ( italic_T , italic_R ) . (4.34)
Proof.

By (3.11), (2.1), the fractional Leibniz rule, and the definitions of the space Xαsuperscript𝑋𝛼X^{\alpha}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we get

𝐰N(t)1+αsubscriptnormsubscript𝐰𝑁𝑡superscript1𝛼\displaystyle\|{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)\|_{\mathcal{H}^{1+\alpha}}∥ bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0tett2(S(t)𝐮0+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)Xα3+𝐰N(t)13)𝑑t.less-than-or-similar-toabsentsuperscriptsubscript0𝑡superscript𝑒𝑡superscript𝑡2superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑆superscript𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉superscript𝑋𝛼3superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝐰𝑁superscript𝑡superscript13differential-dsuperscript𝑡\displaystyle\lesssim\int_{0}^{t}e^{-\frac{t-t^{\prime}}{2}}\big{(}\|S(t^{% \prime}){\mathbf{u}}_{0}+\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{% \set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\|_{X^{\alpha}}^{3}+\|{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t^{\prime})\|_{% \mathcal{H}^{1}}^{3}\big{)}dt^{\prime}.≲ ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∥ italic_S ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∥ bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_d italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (4.35)

Now, the bound in 1+αsuperscript1𝛼\mathcal{H}^{1+\alpha}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in (4.34) follows from (4.33) and (3.12). For the 𝒞αsuperscript𝒞superscript𝛼\mathcal{C}^{\alpha^{\prime}}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-norm in (4.34), we use the embedding 1+α+ε𝒞αsuperscript1superscript𝛼𝜀superscript𝒞superscript𝛼\mathcal{H}^{1+\alpha^{\prime}+\varepsilon}\hookrightarrow\mathcal{C}^{\alpha^% {\prime}}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↪ caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for any ε>0𝜀0\varepsilon>0italic_ε > 0, the boundedness of ΠMsubscriptΠabsent𝑀\Pi_{\leq M}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT on 1+αsuperscript1𝛼\mathcal{H}^{1+\alpha}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and the bound in 1+αsuperscript1𝛼\mathcal{H}^{1+\alpha}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT that we just proved. ∎

We now obtain a uniform control on the transport of the renormalised quantities Qs,Msubscript𝑄𝑠𝑀Q_{s,M}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Lemma 4.5.

Let 0<α<s0𝛼𝑠0<\alpha<s0 < italic_α < italic_s such that sα<12𝑠𝛼12s-\alpha<\frac{1}{2}italic_s - italic_α < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG. Given T>0𝑇0T>0italic_T > 0 and R>0𝑅0R>0italic_R > 0, suppose that

supM20supt[0,T](Qs,M(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))Hαs+ΠMΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ)𝒞α+ΠM\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)Zα)R.subscriptsupremum𝑀superscript2subscript0subscriptsupremum𝑡0𝑇subscriptnormsubscript𝑄𝑠𝑀subscript𝜋1superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉superscript𝐻𝛼𝑠subscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent𝑀superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉superscript𝒞𝛼subscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent𝑀subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉superscript𝑍𝛼𝑅\displaystyle\sup_{M\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}}\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\big{(}\|Q_{s,M}(% \pi_{1}\Phi_{t}^{\textup{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))\|_{H^{\alpha-s}}+\|\Pi_{% \leq M}\Phi_{t}^{\textup{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\|_{\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}}+% \|\Pi_{\leq M}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color% \@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\|_{Z^{\alpha}}\big{)}\leq R.roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_T ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ≤ italic_R .

Then, there exists a constant C(T,R)>0𝐶𝑇𝑅0C(T,R)>0italic_C ( italic_T , italic_R ) > 0 such that

supN,M20supt[0,T]Qs,M(π1ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))HαsC(T,R).subscriptsupremum𝑁𝑀superscript2subscript0subscriptsupremum𝑡0𝑇subscriptnormsubscript𝑄𝑠𝑀subscript𝜋1superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉superscript𝐻𝛼𝑠𝐶𝑇𝑅\displaystyle\sup_{N,M\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}}\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|Q_{s,M}(\pi_{1}% \Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))\|_{H^{\alpha-s}}\leq C(T,R).roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N , italic_M ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_T ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_C ( italic_T , italic_R ) . (4.36)
Proof.

By Sobolev embedding, our assumption, and (4.34),

(sπ1ΠM𝐰N(t))2Hαssubscriptnormsuperscriptsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscript𝜋1subscriptΠabsent𝑀subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡2superscript𝐻𝛼𝑠\displaystyle\|(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\pi_{1}\Pi_{\leq M}{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)% )^{2}\|_{H^{\alpha-s}}∥ ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT π1ΠM𝐰N(t)Ws,42π1𝐰N(t)Hs+122C(R,T),absentsuperscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝜋1subscriptΠabsent𝑀subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡superscript𝑊𝑠42less-than-or-similar-tosuperscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝜋1subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡superscript𝐻𝑠122𝐶𝑅𝑇\displaystyle\leq\|\pi_{1}\Pi_{\leq M}{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)\|_{W^{s,4}}^{2}% \lesssim\|\pi_{1}{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)\|_{H^{s+\frac{1}{2}}}^{2}\leq C(R,T),≤ ∥ italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s , 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≲ ∥ italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_C ( italic_R , italic_T ) ,

uniformly in M𝑀Mitalic_M and N𝑁Nitalic_N, and where we used that s+121+α𝑠121𝛼s+\frac{1}{2}\leq 1+\alphaitalic_s + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ≤ 1 + italic_α, when sα12𝑠𝛼12s-\alpha\leq\frac{1}{2}italic_s - italic_α ≤ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG. Next, using (2.17) and (4.34), we get

(sπ1\displaystyle\|(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\pi_{1}∥ ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ΠMΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ))(sπ1ΠM𝐰N(t))Hαs\displaystyle\Pi_{\leq M}\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))(\langle% \nabla\rangle^{s}\pi_{1}\Pi_{\leq M}{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t))\|_{H^{\alpha-s}}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
sπ1ΠMΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ)Cαssπ1𝐰N(t)Hαs+εless-than-or-similar-toabsentsubscriptnormsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscript𝜋1subscriptΠabsent𝑀superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉superscript𝐶𝛼𝑠subscriptnormsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscript𝜋1subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡superscript𝐻𝛼𝑠𝜀\displaystyle\lesssim\|\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}\pi_{1}\Pi_{\leq M}\Phi_{t}^{% \text{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\|_{C^{\alpha-s}}\|\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}% \pi_{1}{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)\|_{H^{\alpha-s+\varepsilon}}≲ ∥ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - italic_s + italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
π1ΠMΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ)Cαπ1𝐰N(t)H1+αless-than-or-similar-toabsentsubscriptnormsubscript𝜋1subscriptΠabsent𝑀superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉superscript𝐶𝛼subscriptnormsubscript𝜋1subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡superscript𝐻1𝛼\displaystyle\lesssim\|\pi_{1}\Pi_{\leq M}\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{% 0},\xi)\|_{C^{\alpha}}\|\pi_{1}{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t)\|_{H^{1+\alpha}}≲ ∥ italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
C(R,T),absent𝐶𝑅𝑇\displaystyle\leq C(R,T),≤ italic_C ( italic_R , italic_T ) ,

provided that ε<1𝜀1\varepsilon<1italic_ε < 1. Combining these estimates, recalling (3.14) and (3.7) and then applying (4.23) and the triangle inequality yields (4.36). ∎

4.3. Proof of Lemma 4.1

First, we note that (4.13) follows from (4.12) and the convergence in measure from of (4.9), which in turn follows from immediately from Lemma 4.3. We thus focus on establishing (4.12). We set p=1𝑝1p=1italic_p = 1 as the argument is identical for any finite p>1𝑝1p>1italic_p > 1. We now state the Boué-Dupuis variational formula [5, 54]; the current version can be found in [19, Lemma 2.6].

Lemma 4.6.

Let Y𝑌Yitalic_Y be distributed according to (π1)μssubscriptsubscript𝜋1subscript𝜇𝑠(\pi_{1})_{\ast}\vec{\mu}_{s}( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and N𝑁N\in\mathbb{N}italic_N ∈ blackboard_N. Suppose that F:C(𝕋2):𝐹superscript𝐶superscript𝕋2F:C^{\infty}(\mathbb{T}^{2})\to\mathbb{R}italic_F : italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) → blackboard_R is measurable such that 𝔼[|F(ΠNY)|p]<𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝐹subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑌𝑝\mathbb{E}\big{[}|F_{-}(\Pi_{\leq N}Y)|^{p}\big{]}<\inftyblackboard_E [ | italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] < ∞ for some p>1𝑝1p>1italic_p > 1, where Fsubscript𝐹F_{-}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denotes the negative part of F𝐹Fitalic_F. Then, we have

log𝔼[eF(ΠNY)]𝔼[supΘH1+s{F(ΠNY+ΠNΘ)12ΘHx1+s2}],𝔼delimited-[]superscript𝑒𝐹subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑌𝔼delimited-[]subscriptsupremumΘsuperscript𝐻1𝑠conditional-set𝐹subscriptΠabsent𝑁𝑌subscriptΠabsent𝑁Θ12evaluated-atΘsubscriptsuperscript𝐻1𝑠𝑥2\displaystyle\log\mathbb{E}\Big{[}e^{-F(\Pi_{\leq N}Y)}\Big{]}\leq\mathbb{E}% \bigg{[}\sup_{\Theta\in H^{1+s}}\Big{\{}-F(\Pi_{\leq N}Y+\Pi_{\leq N}\Theta)-% \tfrac{1}{2}\|\Theta\|_{H^{1+s}_{x}}^{2}\Big{\}}\bigg{]},roman_log blackboard_E [ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_F ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ≤ blackboard_E [ roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Θ ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { - italic_F ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y + roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Θ ) - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∥ roman_Θ ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ] , (4.37)

and the expectation 𝔼=𝔼𝔼subscript𝔼\mathbb{E}=\mathbb{E}_{\mathbb{P}}blackboard_E = blackboard_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is an expectation with respect to the underlying probability measure \mathbb{P}blackboard_P.

In the following, we simply write YNsubscript𝑌𝑁Y_{N}italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for ΠNYsubscriptΠ𝑁𝑌\Pi_{N}Yroman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y and ΘNsubscriptΘ𝑁\Theta_{N}roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for ΠNΘsubscriptΠabsent𝑁Θ\Pi_{\leq N}\Thetaroman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Θ.

Lemma 4.7.

Let s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0. Then, given any finite p1𝑝1p\geq 1italic_p ≥ 1, we have

𝔼[YNCsεp+Qs,N(YN)Cεp]Cε,p<,𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐶𝑠𝜀𝑝superscriptsubscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐶𝜀𝑝subscript𝐶𝜀𝑝\displaystyle\begin{split}\mathbb{E}\Big{[}&\|Y_{N}\|_{C^{s-\varepsilon}}^{p}+% \|Q_{s,N}(Y_{N})\|_{C^{-\varepsilon}}^{p}\Big{]}\leq C_{\varepsilon,p}<\infty,% \end{split}start_ROW start_CELL blackboard_E [ end_CELL start_CELL ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ≤ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε , italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < ∞ , end_CELL end_ROW

for any ε>0𝜀0\varepsilon>0italic_ε > 0, and uniformly in N𝑁N\in\mathbb{N}italic_N ∈ blackboard_N

We omit the proof of Lemma 4.7 as it follows similarly from [28, (4.6), Proposition 4.3].

Proof of Lemma 4.1 (4.12).

In view of (4.16), we apply Lemma 4.6 with F=Rs,N𝐹subscript𝑅𝑠𝑁F=R_{s,N}italic_F = italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Note that the assumptions in Lemma 4.6 are trivially satisfied as the bounds may depend on N𝑁Nitalic_N. From (4.37), we have

logZs,N𝔼[supΘH1+s{Rs,N(YN+ΘN)12ΘNH1+s2}].subscript𝑍𝑠𝑁𝔼delimited-[]subscriptsupremumΘsuperscript𝐻1𝑠conditional-setsubscript𝑅𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁12evaluated-atsubscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐻1𝑠2\displaystyle\begin{split}\log Z_{s,N}&\leq\mathbb{E}\Big{[}\sup_{\Theta\in H^% {1+s}}\Big{\{}-R_{s,N}(Y_{N}+\Theta_{N})-\tfrac{1}{2}\|\Theta_{N}\|_{H^{1+s}}^% {2}\Big{\}}\Big{]}.\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL roman_log italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ≤ blackboard_E [ roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Θ ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∥ roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ] . end_CELL end_ROW (4.38)

By Hölder and Young’s inequalities, we have

|𝕋2YN3ΘN𝑑x|+|𝕋2YNΘN3𝑑x|subscriptsuperscript𝕋2superscriptsubscript𝑌𝑁3subscriptΘ𝑁differential-d𝑥subscriptsuperscript𝕋2subscript𝑌𝑁superscriptsubscriptΘ𝑁3differential-d𝑥\displaystyle\bigg{|}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}Y_{N}^{3}\Theta_{N}dx\bigg{|}+\bigg{% |}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}Y_{N}\Theta_{N}^{3}dx\bigg{|}| ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_x | + | ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x | CYNL44+1100ΘNL44.absent𝐶superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐿441100superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐿44\displaystyle\leq C\|Y_{N}\|_{L^{4}}^{4}+\frac{1}{100}\|\Theta_{N}\|_{L^{4}}^{% 4}.≤ italic_C ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 100 end_ARG ∥ roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (4.39)

Thus, (4.39) implies

18𝕋2(YN+ΘN)4𝑑x116ΘNL44+CYNL44.18subscriptsuperscript𝕋2superscriptsubscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁4differential-d𝑥116superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐿44𝐶superscriptsubscriptnormsubscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐿44\displaystyle-\frac{1}{8}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}(Y_{N}+\Theta_{N})^{4}dx\leq-% \frac{1}{16}\|\Theta_{N}\|_{L^{4}}^{4}+C\|Y_{N}\|_{L^{4}}^{4}.- divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 8 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x ≤ - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 16 end_ARG ∥ roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_C ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (4.40)

Next, by (2.9), (2.10), (2.7), for every δ>0𝛿0\delta>0italic_δ > 0, there exists Cδ>0subscript𝐶𝛿0C_{\delta}>0italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 such that

|𝕋2Qs,N(YN)(YN+ΘN)2𝑑x|Qs,N(YN)Cε2(YN+ΘN)2B1,1ε2Qs,N(YN)Cε2YN+ΘNL2YN+ΘNB2,1ε2Qs,N(YN)Cε2YN+ΘNL2YN+ΘNHεCδ(1+Qs,N(YN)Cε2)2(1+YNHε)4+δ(ΘNL44+ΘNH1+s2).subscriptsuperscript𝕋2subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁2differential-d𝑥subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐶𝜀2subscriptdelimited-∥∥superscriptsubscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁2subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝜀211less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐶𝜀2subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐿2subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁subscriptsuperscript𝐵𝜀221less-than-or-similar-tosubscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐶𝜀2subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐿2subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐻𝜀subscript𝐶𝛿superscript1subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐶𝜀22superscript1subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐻𝜀4𝛿superscriptsubscriptdelimited-∥∥subscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐿44superscriptsubscriptdelimited-∥∥subscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐻1𝑠2\displaystyle\begin{split}\bigg{|}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}Q_{s,N}(Y_{N})(Y_{N}+% \Theta_{N})^{2}dx\bigg{|}&\leq\|Q_{s,N}(Y_{N})\|_{C^{-\frac{\varepsilon}{2}}}% \|(Y_{N}+\Theta_{N})^{2}\|_{B^{\frac{\varepsilon}{2}}_{1,1}}\\ &\lesssim\|Q_{s,N}(Y_{N})\|_{C^{-\frac{\varepsilon}{2}}}\|Y_{N}+\Theta_{N}\|_{% L^{2}}\|Y_{N}+\Theta_{N}\|_{B^{\frac{\varepsilon}{2}}_{2,1}}\\ &\lesssim\|Q_{s,N}(Y_{N})\|_{C^{-\frac{\varepsilon}{2}}}\|Y_{N}+\Theta_{N}\|_{% L^{2}}\|Y_{N}+\Theta_{N}\|_{H^{\varepsilon}}\\ &\leq C_{\delta}(1+\|Q_{s,N}(Y_{N})\|_{C^{-\frac{\varepsilon}{2}}})^{2}(1+\|Y_% {N}\|_{H^{\varepsilon}})^{4}\\ &\hphantom{XXX}+\delta(\|\Theta_{N}\|_{L^{4}}^{4}+\|\Theta_{N}\|_{H^{1+s}}^{2}% ).\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL | ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x | end_CELL start_CELL ≤ ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≲ ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≲ ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≤ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 + ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 + ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL + italic_δ ( ∥ roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ∥ roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . end_CELL end_ROW (4.41)

By Hölder and Young’s inequalities, we also have

|𝕋2YNΘN(YN+ΘN)2𝑑x|subscriptsuperscript𝕋2subscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁2differential-d𝑥\displaystyle\bigg{|}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}Y_{N}\Theta_{N}(Y_{N}+\Theta_{N})^{2% }dx\bigg{|}| ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x | Cδ(1+YNL)4+δΘNL44,absentsubscript𝐶𝛿superscript1subscriptnormsubscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐿4𝛿superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐿44\displaystyle\leq C_{\delta}(1+\|Y_{N}\|_{L^{\infty}})^{4}+\delta\|\Theta_{N}% \|_{L^{4}}^{4},≤ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 + ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_δ ∥ roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (4.42)

for any δ>0𝛿0\delta>0italic_δ > 0. Thus, by (4.41) and (4.42), we have

𝕋2Qs,N(YN+ΘN)(YN+ΘN)2𝑑x𝕋2Qs,N(YN)(YN+ΘN)2𝑑x2𝕋2YNΘN(YN+ΘN)2𝑑xC(Qs,N(YN)Cε2,YNHε,YNL)+δ(ΘNL4+ΘNH1+s2),subscriptsuperscript𝕋2subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁2differential-d𝑥subscriptsuperscript𝕋2subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁2differential-d𝑥2subscriptsuperscript𝕋2subscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑌𝑁subscriptΘ𝑁2differential-d𝑥𝐶subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐶𝜀2subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐻𝜀subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐿𝛿subscriptdelimited-∥∥subscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐿4superscriptsubscriptdelimited-∥∥subscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐻1𝑠2\displaystyle\begin{split}&-\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}Q_{s,N}(Y_{N}+\Theta_{N})(Y_{% N}+\Theta_{N})^{2}dx\\ &\leq-\int_{\mathbb{T}^{2}}Q_{s,N}(Y_{N})(Y_{N}+\Theta_{N})^{2}dx-2\int_{% \mathbb{T}^{2}}Y_{N}\Theta_{N}(Y_{N}+\Theta_{N})^{2}dx\\ &\leq C(\|Q_{s,N}(Y_{N})\|_{C^{-\frac{\varepsilon}{2}}},\|Y_{N}\|_{H^{% \varepsilon}},\|Y_{N}\|_{L^{\infty}})+\delta(\|\Theta_{N}\|_{L^{4}}+\|\Theta_{% N}\|_{H^{1+s}}^{2}),\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL - ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≤ - ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x - 2 ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_x end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≤ italic_C ( ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + italic_δ ( ∥ roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , end_CELL end_ROW (4.43)

where C(x,y,z)𝐶𝑥𝑦𝑧C(x,y,z)italic_C ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_z ) is polynomial in its arguments. Therefore Lemma 4.7 implies

supN𝔼[C(Qs,N(YN)Cε2,YNHε,YNL)]<.subscriptsupremum𝑁𝔼delimited-[]𝐶subscriptnormsubscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐶𝜀2subscriptnormsubscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐻𝜀subscriptnormsubscript𝑌𝑁superscript𝐿\displaystyle\sup_{N\in\mathbb{N}}\mathbb{E}[C(\|Q_{s,N}(Y_{N})\|_{C^{-\frac{% \varepsilon}{2}}},\|Y_{N}\|_{H^{\varepsilon}},\|Y_{N}\|_{L^{\infty}})]<\infty.roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ blackboard_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT blackboard_E [ italic_C ( ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_ε end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∥ italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] < ∞ .

Combining (4.40) and (4.43) in (4.38) and choosing δ>0𝛿0\delta>0italic_δ > 0 sufficiently small, we have shown

logZs,NC+𝔼[supΘH1+s{132ΘNL4414ΘNH1+s2}]C,subscript𝑍𝑠𝑁𝐶𝔼delimited-[]subscriptsupremumΘsuperscript𝐻1𝑠conditional-set132evaluated-atsubscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐿4414superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΘ𝑁superscript𝐻1𝑠2𝐶\displaystyle\log Z_{s,N}\leq C+\mathbb{E}\big{[}\sup_{\Theta\in H^{1+s}}\big{% \{}-\tfrac{1}{32}\|\Theta_{N}\|_{L^{4}}^{4}-\tfrac{1}{4}\|\Theta_{N}\|_{H^{1+s% }}^{2}\big{\}}\big{]}\leq C,roman_log italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_C + blackboard_E [ roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Θ ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 32 end_ARG ∥ roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG ∥ roman_Θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ] ≤ italic_C ,

uniformly in N𝑁N\in\mathbb{N}italic_N ∈ blackboard_N. This completes the proof of (4.12). ∎

5. On the transported densities

5.1. Functional derivatives

For vector-valued functions 𝐮𝐮{\mathbf{u}}bold_u and 𝐯𝐯{\mathbf{v}}bold_v, we define an inner product on L2(𝕋2)×L2(𝕋2)superscript𝐿2superscript𝕋2superscript𝐿2superscript𝕋2L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{2})\times L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) × italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) by

𝐮,𝐯L2×L2:=u1,v1L2+u2,v2L2,assignsubscript𝐮𝐯superscript𝐿2superscript𝐿2subscriptsubscript𝑢1subscript𝑣1superscript𝐿2subscriptsubscript𝑢2subscript𝑣2superscript𝐿2\displaystyle\langle{\mathbf{u}},{\mathbf{v}}\rangle_{L^{2}\times L^{2}}:=% \langle u_{1},v_{1}\rangle_{L^{2}}+\langle u_{2},v_{2}\rangle_{L^{2}},⟨ bold_u , bold_v ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := ⟨ italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ⟨ italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,

and we denote the Fréchet derivatives as follows: if F:𝒮()2:𝐹𝒮superscript2F:\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R})^{2}\to\mathbb{R}italic_F : caligraphic_S ( blackboard_R ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → blackboard_R, then

dF|𝐮[𝐟]=ddθ|θ=0F(𝐮+θ𝐟)=D𝐮F,𝐟=u1F,f1+u2F,f2.evaluated-at𝑑𝐹𝐮delimited-[]𝐟evaluated-at𝑑𝑑𝜃𝜃0𝐹𝐮𝜃𝐟subscript𝐷𝐮𝐹𝐟subscriptsubscript𝑢1𝐹subscript𝑓1subscriptsubscript𝑢2𝐹subscript𝑓2\displaystyle dF|_{{\mathbf{u}}}[{\bf f}]=\frac{d}{d\theta}\bigg{|}_{\theta=0}% F({\mathbf{u}}+\theta{\bf f})=\langle D_{{\mathbf{u}}}F,{\bf f}\rangle=\langle% \partial_{u_{1}}F,f_{1}\rangle+\langle\partial_{u_{2}}F,f_{2}\rangle.italic_d italic_F | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ bold_f ] = divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_θ end_ARG | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ( bold_u + italic_θ bold_f ) = ⟨ italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F , bold_f ⟩ = ⟨ ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F , italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ + ⟨ ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F , italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ .

and, if F𝐹Fitalic_F is also C2superscript𝐶2C^{2}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, then we define the second functional derivative

D2F|𝐮[𝐟,𝐡]:=ddθ|θ=0dF|𝐮+θ𝐡[𝐟]=(D𝐮2F)[𝐡],𝐟assignevaluated-atsuperscript𝐷2𝐹𝐮𝐟𝐡evaluated-atevaluated-at𝑑𝑑𝜃𝜃0𝑑𝐹𝐮𝜃𝐡delimited-[]𝐟subscriptsuperscript𝐷2𝐮𝐹delimited-[]𝐡𝐟\displaystyle D^{2}F|_{{\mathbf{u}}}[{\bf f},{\bf h}]:=\frac{d}{d\theta}\bigg{% |}_{\theta=0}dF|_{{\mathbf{u}}+\theta{\bf h}}[{\bf f}]=\langle(D^{2}_{{\mathbf% {u}}}F)[{\bf h}],{\bf f}\rangleitalic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ bold_f , bold_h ] := divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_θ end_ARG | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_F | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u + italic_θ bold_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ bold_f ] = ⟨ ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) [ bold_h ] , bold_f ⟩

and the Hessian D𝐮2Fsubscriptsuperscript𝐷2𝐮𝐹D^{2}_{{\mathbf{u}}}Fitalic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F can be further expanded as

D𝐮2F=(u1u22Fu1u22Fu2u12Fu2u22F).subscriptsuperscript𝐷2𝐮𝐹matrixsuperscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑢1subscript𝑢22𝐹superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑢1subscript𝑢22𝐹superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑢2subscript𝑢12𝐹superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑢2subscript𝑢22𝐹\displaystyle D^{2}_{{\mathbf{u}}}F=\begin{pmatrix}\partial_{u_{1}u_{2}}^{2}F&% \partial_{u_{1}u_{2}}^{2}F\\ \partial_{u_{2}u_{1}}^{2}F&\partial_{u_{2}u_{2}}^{2}F\end{pmatrix}.italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F = ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F end_CELL start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F end_CELL start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) .

In the finite dimensional setting, we can relate the functional derivatives D𝐮Nsubscript𝐷subscript𝐮𝑁D_{{\mathbf{u}}_{N}}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to the derivatives with respect to the Fourier coefficients {a0,an,1,an,2}nΛNsubscriptsubscript𝑎0subscript𝑎𝑛1subscript𝑎𝑛2𝑛superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁\{a_{0},a_{n,1},a_{n,2}\}_{n\in\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}}{ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of uNsubscript𝑢𝑁u_{N}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as in (4.5). In particular, by the chain rule, we have

an,1F=ReuNF^(n),an,2F=ImuNF^(n),anda0F=uNF^(0),formulae-sequencesubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛1𝐹Re^subscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁𝐹𝑛formulae-sequencesubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛2𝐹Im^subscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁𝐹𝑛andsubscriptsubscript𝑎0𝐹^subscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁𝐹0\displaystyle\partial_{a_{n,1}}F=\operatorname*{Re}\widehat{\partial_{u_{N}}F}% (n),\quad\partial_{a_{n,2}}F=\operatorname*{Im}\widehat{\partial_{u_{N}}F}(n),% \quad\text{and}\quad\partial_{a_{0}}F=\widehat{\partial_{u_{N}}F}(0),∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F = roman_Re over^ start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_ARG ( italic_n ) , ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F = roman_Im over^ start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_ARG ( italic_n ) , and ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F = over^ start_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_ARG ( 0 ) ,

so that

uNF(x)=a0F+nΛN{an,1F2cos(nx)+an,2F(2sin(nx))}.subscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁𝐹𝑥subscriptsubscript𝑎0𝐹subscript𝑛superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁subscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛1𝐹2𝑛𝑥subscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛2𝐹2𝑛𝑥\displaystyle\partial_{u_{N}}F(x)=\partial_{a_{0}}F+\sum_{n\in\Lambda_{N}^{% \ast}}\big{\{}\partial_{a_{n,1}}F\cdot 2\cos(n\cdot x)+\partial_{a_{n,2}}F% \cdot(-2\sin(n\cdot x))\big{\}}.∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ( italic_x ) = ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ⋅ 2 roman_cos ( italic_n ⋅ italic_x ) + ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ⋅ ( - 2 roman_sin ( italic_n ⋅ italic_x ) ) } .

5.2. Transported densities

In the following, we fix N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and consider the truncated system (3.5). Using ΠNξ(t)=|n|Ndβn(t)einxsubscriptΠabsent𝑁𝜉𝑡subscript𝑛𝑁𝑑subscript𝛽𝑛𝑡superscript𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑥\Pi_{\leq N}\xi(t)=\sum_{|n|\leq N}d\beta_{n}(t)e^{in\cdot x}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ( italic_t ) = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_n | ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i italic_n ⋅ italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, (3.5) is then a finite dimensional system of SDEs for the Fourier coefficients {(a0,an,1,an,2),(b0,bn,1,bn,2)}nΛNsubscriptsubscript𝑎0subscript𝑎𝑛1subscript𝑎𝑛2subscript𝑏0subscript𝑏𝑛1subscript𝑏𝑛2𝑛superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁\{(a_{0},a_{n,1},a_{n,2}),(b_{0},b_{n,1},b_{n,2})\}_{n\in\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}}{ ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , ( italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We use (4.5) as a bijection between (uN,vN)subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁(u_{N},v_{N})( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and the coefficients {(a0,an,1,an,2),(b0,bn,1,bn,2)}nΛNsubscriptsubscript𝑎0subscript𝑎𝑛1subscript𝑎𝑛2subscript𝑏0subscript𝑏𝑛1subscript𝑏𝑛2𝑛superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁\{(a_{0},a_{n,1},a_{n,2}),(b_{0},b_{n,1},b_{n,2})\}_{n\in\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}}{ ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , ( italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We write (3.5) in the Ito formulation:

d(uNvN)={J(uN,vN)H(uN,vN)(0vN)}dt+2(000ΠNs)(0dWt),𝑑matrixsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁𝐽subscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁𝐻subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁matrix0subscript𝑣𝑁𝑑𝑡2matrix000subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠matrix0𝑑subscript𝑊𝑡\displaystyle d\begin{pmatrix}u_{N}\\ v_{N}\end{pmatrix}=\bigg{\{}J\nabla_{(u_{N},v_{N})}H(u_{N},v_{N})-\begin{% pmatrix}0\\ v_{N}\end{pmatrix}\bigg{\}}dt+\sqrt{2}\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\ 0&\Pi_{\leq N}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0\\ dW_{t}\end{pmatrix},italic_d ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) = { italic_J ∇ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) } italic_d italic_t + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_d italic_W start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) , (5.1)

where

J:=(0110),assign𝐽matrix0110\displaystyle J:=\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\ -1&0\end{pmatrix},italic_J := ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL - 1 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ,

and (uN,vN)=(uN,vN)subscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁subscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁subscriptsubscript𝑣𝑁\nabla_{(u_{N},v_{N})}=(\partial_{u_{N}},\partial_{v_{N}})∇ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is the gradient with respect to the variables (uN,vN)subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁(u_{N},v_{N})( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). With respect to 𝒱N×𝒱Nsubscript𝒱𝑁subscript𝒱𝑁\mathcal{V}_{N}\times\mathcal{V}_{N}caligraphic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × caligraphic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we associate to (5.1) the (adjoint of the) infinitesimal generator:

NF=div(uN,vN)[(JH)F]+div(uN,vN)[(0001)(uNvN)F]+Tr[D(uN,vN)2(000ΠN2s)F].superscriptsubscript𝑁𝐹subscriptdivsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁delimited-[]𝐽𝐻𝐹subscriptdivsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁delimited-[]matrix0001matrixsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁𝐹Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝐷subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁2matrix000subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩2𝑠𝐹\displaystyle\begin{split}\mathcal{L}_{N}^{\ast}F&=-\text{div}_{(u_{N},v_{N})}% \big{[}(J\nabla H)F\big{]}+\text{div}_{(u_{N},v_{N})}\bigg{[}\begin{pmatrix}0&% 0\\ 0&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}u_{N}\\ v_{N}\end{pmatrix}F\bigg{]}\\ &\hphantom{XXX}+\text{Tr}\bigg{[}D_{(u_{N},v_{N})}^{2}\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\ 0&\Pi_{\leq N}\langle\nabla\rangle^{-2s}\end{pmatrix}F\bigg{]}.\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F end_CELL start_CELL = - div start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( italic_J ∇ italic_H ) italic_F ] + div start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) italic_F ] end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL + Tr [ italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ) italic_F ] . end_CELL end_ROW (5.2)

As div(uN,vN)JH=0subscriptdivsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁𝐽𝐻0\text{div}_{(u_{N},v_{N})}J\nabla H=0div start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J ∇ italic_H = 0, we rewrite (5.2) as

NFsuperscriptsubscript𝑁𝐹\displaystyle\mathcal{L}_{N}^{\ast}Fcaligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F ={H,F}+divvN(vNF)+divvN[vN(2sF)],absent𝐻𝐹subscriptdivsubscript𝑣𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁𝐹subscriptdivsubscript𝑣𝑁delimited-[]subscriptsubscript𝑣𝑁superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩2𝑠𝐹\displaystyle=-\{H,F\}+\text{div}_{v_{N}}(v_{N}F)+\text{div}_{v_{N}}[\nabla_{v% _{N}}(\langle\nabla\rangle^{-2s}F)],= - { italic_H , italic_F } + div start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) + div start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ∇ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F ) ] , (5.3)

where

{H,F}:=vNH,uNFuNH,vNF,assign𝐻𝐹subscriptsubscript𝑣𝑁𝐻subscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁𝐹subscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁𝐻subscriptsubscript𝑣𝑁𝐹\displaystyle\{H,F\}:=\langle\partial_{v_{N}}H,\partial_{u_{N}}F\rangle-% \langle\partial_{u_{N}}H,\partial_{v_{N}}F\rangle,{ italic_H , italic_F } := ⟨ ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H , ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ⟩ - ⟨ ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H , ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ⟩ , (5.4)

and

divvN[F(v)]:=div(b0,b1,n,b2,n)F(v)=b0F+n=1N(b1,nF+b2,nF).assignsubscriptdivsubscript𝑣𝑁delimited-[]𝐹𝑣subscriptdivsubscript𝑏0subscript𝑏1𝑛subscript𝑏2𝑛𝐹𝑣subscriptsubscript𝑏0𝐹superscriptsubscript𝑛1𝑁subscriptsubscript𝑏1𝑛𝐹subscriptsubscript𝑏2𝑛𝐹\displaystyle\text{div}_{v_{N}}[F(v)]:=\text{div}_{(b_{0},b_{1,n},b_{2,n})}F(v% )=\partial_{b_{0}}F+\sum_{n=1}^{N}\big{(}\partial_{b_{1,n}}F+\partial_{b_{2,n}% }F\big{)}.div start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_F ( italic_v ) ] := div start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ( italic_v ) = ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F + ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) .

Note that

divvN[vNF]subscriptdivsubscript𝑣𝑁delimited-[]subscript𝑣𝑁𝐹\displaystyle\text{div}_{v_{N}}[v_{N}F]div start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ] =(|ΛN|+1)F+vN,vNF.absentsuperscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁1𝐹subscript𝑣𝑁subscriptsubscript𝑣𝑁𝐹\displaystyle=(|\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}|+1)F+\langle v_{N},\partial_{v_{N}}F\rangle.= ( | roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | + 1 ) italic_F + ⟨ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ⟩ .

Let 𝐮N(t)subscript𝐮𝑁𝑡{\mathbf{u}}_{N}(t)bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) denote the almost sure global-in-time solution to (5.1) with initial data 𝐮0,Nsubscript𝐮0𝑁{\mathbf{u}}_{0,N}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, as guaranteed by Proposition 3.1, and recall the decomposition

𝐮N(t;𝐮0,ξ)=S(t)𝐮0,N+ΠN\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)+𝐰N(t).subscript𝐮𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑆𝑡subscript𝐮0𝑁subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉subscript𝐰𝑁𝑡\displaystyle{\mathbf{u}}_{N}(t;{\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)=S(t){\mathbf{u}}_{0,N}+% \Pi_{\leq N}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color% \@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)+{\mathbf{w}}_{N}(t).bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ; bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = italic_S ( italic_t ) bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) + bold_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) .

These solutions generate a Markov semigroup

𝒫~tF(𝐮0,N)=𝔼[F(𝐮N(t;𝐮0,ξ))],subscript~𝒫𝑡𝐹subscript𝐮0𝑁𝔼delimited-[]𝐹subscript𝐮𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉\displaystyle\widetilde{\mathcal{P}}_{t}F({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})=\mathbb{E}[F({% \mathbf{u}}_{N}(t;{\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))],over~ start_ARG caligraphic_P end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = blackboard_E [ italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ; bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] ,

and the push-forward measure γt,N:=(𝒫~t)LNassignsubscript𝛾𝑡𝑁subscriptsubscript~𝒫𝑡subscript𝐿𝑁\gamma_{t,N}:=(\widetilde{\mathcal{P}}_{t})_{\ast}L_{N}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := ( over~ start_ARG caligraphic_P end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a weak solution to the Fokker-Planck equation:

{tγt,N=γt,Nγt,N|t=0=eEs,N(uN,vN)dLN,casessubscript𝑡subscript𝛾𝑡𝑁superscriptsubscript𝛾𝑡𝑁otherwiseevaluated-atsubscript𝛾𝑡𝑁𝑡0superscript𝑒subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁𝑑subscript𝐿𝑁otherwise\begin{cases}\partial_{t}\gamma_{t,N}=\mathcal{L}^{\ast}\gamma_{t,N}\\ \gamma_{t,N}|_{t=0}=e^{-E_{s,N}(u_{N},v_{N})}dL_{N},\end{cases}{ start_ROW start_CELL ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW (5.5)

where Es,Nsubscript𝐸𝑠𝑁E_{s,N}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is as in (4.10). See [4, Proposition 1.3.1].

Lemma 5.1.

For each N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, there exists htNC1,2([0,)×2(|ΛN|+1))superscriptsubscript𝑡𝑁superscript𝐶120superscript2superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁1h_{t}^{N}\in C^{1,2}([0,\infty)\times\mathbb{R}^{2(|\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}|+1)})italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 , 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( [ 0 , ∞ ) × blackboard_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 ( | roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | + 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) such that γt,N=htNdLNsubscript𝛾𝑡𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑡𝑁𝑑subscript𝐿𝑁\gamma_{t,N}=h_{t}^{N}dL_{N}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and htNsuperscriptsubscript𝑡𝑁h_{t}^{N}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT satisfies

thtN(𝐮0,N)|t=0=(eEs,N(𝐮0,N))={H,s,N}(𝐮0,N)eEs,N(𝐮0,N),evaluated-atsubscript𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁𝑡0superscriptsuperscript𝑒subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁𝐻subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁superscript𝑒subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁\displaystyle\partial_{t}h_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})|_{t=0}=\mathcal{L}^{% \ast}(e^{-E_{s,N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})})=-\{H,\mathcal{E}_{s,N}\}({\mathbf{u}}_% {0,N})e^{-E_{s,N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})},∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = - { italic_H , caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (5.6)

and

{H,s,N}(𝐮0,N)=vN,3s[suNuN2]2s(uN3)+3Qs,N(uN)uN.𝐻subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁3superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠delimited-[]superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscript𝑢𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩2𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁33subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁\displaystyle\{H,\mathcal{E}_{s,N}\}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})=\langle v_{N},3% \langle\nabla\rangle^{s}[\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}u_{N}\cdot u_{N}^{2}]-\langle% \nabla\rangle^{2s}(u_{N}^{3})+3Q_{s,N}(u_{N})u_{N}\rangle.{ italic_H , caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ⟨ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 3 ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] - ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + 3 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ . (5.7)
Proof.

As the coefficients of the operator superscript\mathcal{L}^{\ast}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are smooth and the initial datum eEs,N(𝐮0,N)superscript𝑒subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁e^{-E_{s,N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is smooth, Hörmander’s condition ensures that γt,N=htNdLNsubscript𝛾𝑡𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑡𝑁𝑑subscript𝐿𝑁\gamma_{t,N}=h_{t}^{N}dL_{N}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and htNC,([0,)×2(|ΛN|+1))superscriptsubscript𝑡𝑁superscript𝐶0superscript2superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁1h_{t}^{N}\in C^{\infty,\infty}([0,\infty)\times\mathbb{R}^{2(|\Lambda_{N}^{% \ast}|+1)})italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ , ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( [ 0 , ∞ ) × blackboard_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 ( | roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | + 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). The first equality in (5.6) follows from (5.5) and the second equality follows from (5.3), (5.4), (4.10), and the fact that {H,H}=0𝐻𝐻0\{H,H\}=0{ italic_H , italic_H } = 0. In particular, we have

divvN[vN(2seEs,N)]=(|ΛN|+1)eEs,NvN,vNeEs,N=divvN(vNeEs,N).subscriptdivsubscript𝑣𝑁delimited-[]subscriptsubscript𝑣𝑁superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩2𝑠superscript𝑒subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁1superscript𝑒subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁subscriptsubscript𝑣𝑁superscript𝑒subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁subscriptdivsubscript𝑣𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁superscript𝑒subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁\displaystyle\text{div}_{v_{N}}[\nabla_{v_{N}}(\langle\nabla\rangle^{-2s}e^{-E% _{s,N}})]=-(|\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}|+1)e^{-E_{s,N}}-\langle v_{N},\partial_{v_{N}}% e^{-E_{s,N}}\rangle=-\text{div}_{v_{N}}(v_{N}e^{-E_{s,N}}).div start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ∇ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] = - ( | roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | + 1 ) italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ⟨ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ = - div start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) .

Finally, for (5.7), a direct computation from (4.11) shows that

uNs,N(uN,vN)subscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁\displaystyle\partial_{u_{N}}\mathcal{E}_{s,N}(u_{N},v_{N})∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) =(2s1)2uN+3s(suNuN2)+3Qs,N(uN)uN,absentsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩2𝑠1superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩2subscript𝑢𝑁3superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscript𝑢𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁23subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁\displaystyle=(\langle\nabla\rangle^{2s}-1)\langle\nabla\rangle^{2}u_{N}+3% \langle\nabla\rangle^{s}(\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}u_{N}\cdot u_{N}^{2})+3Q_{s,N% }(u_{N})u_{N},= ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 ) ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 3 ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + 3 italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,
vNs,N(uN,vN)subscriptsubscript𝑣𝑁subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁\displaystyle\partial_{v_{N}}\mathcal{E}_{s,N}(u_{N},v_{N})∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) =2svNvN,absentsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩2𝑠subscript𝑣𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁\displaystyle=\langle\nabla\rangle^{2s}v_{N}-v_{N},= ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,

and from (3.13), we have

uNH(uN,vN)=uNΔuN+uN3andvNH(uN,vN)=vN.formulae-sequencesubscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁𝐻subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁Δsubscript𝑢𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁3andsubscriptsubscript𝑣𝑁𝐻subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁\displaystyle\partial_{u_{N}}H(u_{N},v_{N})=u_{N}-\Delta u_{N}+u_{N}^{3}\quad% \text{and}\quad\partial_{v_{N}}H(u_{N},v_{N})=v_{N}.∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_Δ italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

Then (5.7) follows from (5.4), and using that 2=1Δsuperscriptdelimited-⟨⟩21Δ\langle\nabla\rangle^{2}=1-\Delta⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 - roman_Δ. ∎

We define

gtN(𝐮0,N):=eEs,N(𝐮0,N)htN(𝐮0,N),assignsuperscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁superscript𝑒subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁\displaystyle g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N}):=e^{E_{s,N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})}h_% {t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N}),italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) := italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , (5.8)

which is the transported density of the truncated probability measure

dρs,N:=Z~s,N1eEs,N(𝐮0,N)dLN=Zs,N1eRs,N(𝐮0)dμs,N.assign𝑑subscript𝜌𝑠𝑁superscriptsubscript~𝑍𝑠𝑁1superscript𝑒subscript𝐸𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁𝑑subscript𝐿𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑍𝑠𝑁1superscript𝑒subscript𝑅𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑑subscript𝜇𝑠𝑁\displaystyle d\vec{\rho}_{s,N}:=\widetilde{Z}_{s,N}^{-1}e^{-E_{s,N}({\mathbf{% u}}_{0,N})}dL_{N}=Z_{s,N}^{-1}e^{-R_{s,N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})}d\vec{\mu}_{s,N}.italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := over~ start_ARG italic_Z end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (5.9)

We extend gtNsuperscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁g_{t}^{N}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to all of Xαsuperscript𝑋𝛼X^{\alpha}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT by defining gtN(𝐮0):=gtN(ΠN𝐮0)assignsuperscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0}):=g_{t}^{N}(\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0})italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) := italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). In the following key result, we show that gtNsuperscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁g_{t}^{N}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the transported density of the measure (𝒫tN)νs,Nsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁subscript𝜈𝑠𝑁(\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N})^{\ast}\vec{\nu}_{s,N}( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with respect to νs,Nsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁\vec{\nu}_{s,N}over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as well as obtain good long-time Lpsuperscript𝐿𝑝L^{p}italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-bounds for gtNsuperscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁g_{t}^{N}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT when restricted to compact sets.

Lemma 5.2.

Let s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0 and N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Then, it holds that

gtN(𝐮0)=d(𝒫tN)νs,Ndνs,N.superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑑superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁subscript𝜈𝑠𝑁𝑑subscript𝜈𝑠𝑁\displaystyle g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})=\frac{d(\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N})^{\ast}% \vec{\nu}_{s,N}}{d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}}.italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = divide start_ARG italic_d ( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG . (5.10)

Moreover, for α>0𝛼0\alpha>0italic_α > 0 such that sα<13min(1,s)𝑠𝛼131𝑠s-\alpha<\frac{1}{3}\min(1,s)italic_s - italic_α < divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG roman_min ( 1 , italic_s ) and K2(ΛN+1)𝐾superscript2superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁1K\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{2(\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}+1)}italic_K ⊆ blackboard_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 ( roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a compact set, there exists 0<τ(K,N)10𝜏𝐾𝑁10<\tau(K,N)\leq 10 < italic_τ ( italic_K , italic_N ) ≤ 1 such that

|gtN(𝐮0,N)|1+t({H,s,N}(𝐮0,N)+1)superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁1𝑡𝐻subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁1\displaystyle|g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})|\leq 1+t(\{H,\mathcal{E}_{s,N}\}({% \mathbf{u}}_{0,N})+1)| italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | ≤ 1 + italic_t ( { italic_H , caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 1 ) (5.11)

for all 0tτ(K,N)0𝑡𝜏𝐾𝑁0\leq t\leq\tau(K,N)0 ≤ italic_t ≤ italic_τ ( italic_K , italic_N ) and 𝐮0,NKsubscript𝐮0𝑁𝐾{\mathbf{u}}_{0,N}\in Kbold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_K. Furthermore, given R>0𝑅0R>0italic_R > 0, let

KR:={𝐮0:supN(ΠN𝐮0𝒞α+Qs,N(π1𝐮0)Hαs)R}assignsubscript𝐾𝑅conditional-setsubscript𝐮0subscriptsupremum𝑁subscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0superscript𝒞𝛼subscriptnormsubscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝜋1subscript𝐮0superscript𝐻𝛼𝑠𝑅\displaystyle K_{R}:=\Big{\{}{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\,:\,\sup_{N\in\mathbb{N}}\big{(}% \|\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0}\|_{\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}}+\|Q_{s,N}(\pi_{1}{% \mathbf{u}}_{0})\|_{H^{\alpha-s}}\big{)}\leq R\Big{\}}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := { bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ blackboard_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ≤ italic_R } (5.12)

and KR,N:=ΠNKRassignsubscript𝐾𝑅𝑁subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐾𝑅K_{R,N}:=\Pi_{\leq N}K_{R}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Then, KR,Nsubscript𝐾𝑅𝑁K_{R,N}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is pre-compact in 2(|ΛN|+1)superscript2superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁1\mathbb{R}^{2(|\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}|+1)}blackboard_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 ( | roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | + 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and

sup0tτ(KR,N,N)gtN(𝐮0)𝟏KR,N(ΠN𝐮0)Lp(νs,N)pc0eC(R)(pτ(KR,N,N))2subscriptsupremum0𝑡𝜏subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁𝑁superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptsuperscript𝑔𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript1subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0superscript𝐿𝑝subscript𝜈𝑠𝑁𝑝subscript𝑐0superscript𝑒𝐶𝑅superscript𝑝𝜏subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁𝑁2\displaystyle\sup_{0\leq t\leq\tau(K_{R,N},N)}\|g^{N}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})% \mathbf{1}_{K_{R,N}}(\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0})\|_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N})}^% {p}\leq c_{0}e^{C(R)(p\tau(K_{R,N},N))^{2}}roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 ≤ italic_t ≤ italic_τ ( italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_R ) ( italic_p italic_τ ( italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N ) ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (5.13)

for all 1p<1𝑝1\leq p<\infty1 ≤ italic_p < ∞, and where the constants c0,C(R)subscript𝑐0𝐶𝑅c_{0},C(R)italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_C ( italic_R ) do not depend on N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Proof.

We first show (5.10). Recalling (4.14) and (4.4), we have

dνs,N=ρs,Nμs,N.𝑑subscript𝜈𝑠𝑁tensor-productsubscript𝜌𝑠𝑁superscriptsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁perpendicular-to\displaystyle d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}=\vec{\rho}_{s,N}\otimes\vec{\mu}_{s,N}^{\perp}.italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = over→ start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (5.14)

Let AΠNXα𝐴subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscript𝑋𝛼A\subseteq\Pi_{\leq N}X^{\alpha}italic_A ⊆ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and BΠ>NXα𝐵subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscript𝑋𝛼B\subseteq\Pi_{>N}X^{\alpha}italic_B ⊆ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT be measurable sets. Then, as ΠNξsubscriptΠabsent𝑁𝜉\Pi_{\leq N}\xiroman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ and Π>NξsubscriptΠabsent𝑁𝜉\Pi_{>N}\xiroman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ are independent and, for fixed 𝐮0subscript𝐮0{\mathbf{u}}_{0}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, ΠNΦtN(𝐮0,ξ)subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉\Pi_{\leq N}\Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) and Π>NΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ)subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉\Pi_{>N}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) depend only on ΠNξsubscriptΠabsent𝑁𝜉\Pi_{\leq N}\xiroman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ and Π>NξsubscriptΠabsent𝑁𝜉\Pi_{>N}\xiroman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ, respectively, the random variables ΠNΦtN(𝐮0,ξ)subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉\Pi_{\leq N}\Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) and Π>NΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ)subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉\Pi_{>N}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) are independent. Thus, using (5.14) and the invariance of μs,Nsuperscriptsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁perpendicular-to\vec{\mu}_{s,N}^{\perp}over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT under the linear high-frequency flow Π>NΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ)subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscriptsuperscriptΦlin𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉\Pi_{>N}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ), we obtain

\displaystyle\int 𝟏A(ΠN𝐮0)𝟏B(Π>N𝐮0)d(𝒫tN)(νs,N)subscript1𝐴subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0subscript1𝐵subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑑superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁subscript𝜈𝑠𝑁\displaystyle\mathbf{1}_{A}(\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0})\mathbf{1}_{B}(\Pi_{>% N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0})d(\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N})^{\ast}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N})bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d ( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
=𝔼[𝟏A(ΠNΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))𝟏B(Π>NΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ))]𝑑νs,Nabsent𝔼delimited-[]subscript1𝐴subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1𝐵subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁\displaystyle=\int\mathbb{E}\big{[}\mathbf{1}_{A}(\Pi_{\leq N}\Phi_{t}^{N}({% \mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))\mathbf{1}_{B}(\Pi_{>N}\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}% _{0},\xi))\big{]}d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}= ∫ blackboard_E [ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=𝔼[𝟏A(ΠNΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))]𝔼[𝟏B(Π>NΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ))]𝑑νs,Nabsent𝔼delimited-[]subscript1𝐴subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝔼delimited-[]subscript1𝐵subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁\displaystyle=\int\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{A}(\Pi_{\leq N}\Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{% u}}_{0},\xi))]\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{B}(\Pi_{>N}\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}({\mathbf% {u}}_{0},\xi))]d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}= ∫ blackboard_E [ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] blackboard_E [ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=𝔼[𝟏A(ΠNΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))]𝔼[𝟏B(Π>NΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ))]𝑑νs,N𝑑ρs,Nabsent𝔼delimited-[]subscript1𝐴subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝔼delimited-[]subscript1𝐵subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡linsubscript𝐮0𝜉differential-dsuperscriptsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁perpendicular-todifferential-dsubscript𝜌𝑠𝑁\displaystyle=\int\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{A}(\Pi_{\leq N}\Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{% u}}_{0},\xi))]\int\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{B}(\Pi_{>N}\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}({% \mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))]d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}^{\perp}d\vec{\rho}_{s,N}= ∫ blackboard_E [ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] ∫ blackboard_E [ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=𝟏B(Π>N𝐮0)𝔼[𝟏A(ΠNΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))]𝑑ρs,N𝑑μs,Nabsentsubscript1𝐵subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0𝔼delimited-[]subscript1𝐴subscriptΠabsent𝑁superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉differential-dsubscript𝜌𝑠𝑁differential-dsuperscriptsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁perpendicular-to\displaystyle=\int\mathbf{1}_{B}(\Pi_{>N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0})\int\mathbb{E}[% \mathbf{1}_{A}(\Pi_{\leq N}\Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))]d\vec{\rho}_{s,% N}d\vec{\mu}_{s,N}^{\perp}= ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∫ blackboard_E [ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
=𝟏A(ΠN𝐮0)𝟏B(Π>N𝐮0)gtN(𝐮0)𝑑νs,N.absentsubscript1𝐴subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0subscript1𝐵subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁\displaystyle=\int\mathbf{1}_{A}(\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0})\mathbf{1}_{B}(% \Pi_{>N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0})g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}.= ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

As this holds for all such sets A𝐴Aitalic_A and B𝐵Bitalic_B, we conclude (5.14).

We now move onto the latter claims in the lemma. By Lemma 5.1 and (5.8), gtNC1,2([0,)×2(|ΛN|+1))superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁superscript𝐶120superscript2superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑁1g_{t}^{N}\in C^{1,2}([0,\infty)\times\mathbb{R}^{2(|\Lambda_{N}^{\ast}|+1)})italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 , 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( [ 0 , ∞ ) × blackboard_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 ( | roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | + 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) and satisfies g0N(𝐮0,N)=1superscriptsubscript𝑔0𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁1g_{0}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})=1italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 1 and tgtN(𝐮0,N)|t=0={H,s,N}(𝐮0,N)evaluated-atsubscript𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁𝑡0𝐻subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁\partial_{t}g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})|_{t=0}=-\{H,\mathcal{E}_{s,N}\}({% \mathbf{u}}_{0,N})∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - { italic_H , caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). As tgt(𝐮0,N)subscript𝑡subscript𝑔𝑡subscript𝐮0𝑁\partial_{t}g_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is uniformly continuous on [0,1]×K01𝐾[0,1]\times K[ 0 , 1 ] × italic_K, there exists 0<τ(K,N)10𝜏𝐾𝑁10<\tau(K,N)\leq 10 < italic_τ ( italic_K , italic_N ) ≤ 1 such that for all 0tτ(K,N)0𝑡𝜏𝐾𝑁0\leq t\leq\tau(K,N)0 ≤ italic_t ≤ italic_τ ( italic_K , italic_N ), and 𝐮0,NKsubscript𝐮0𝑁𝐾{\mathbf{u}}_{0,N}\in Kbold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_K,

|tgtN(𝐮0,N)tgtN(𝐮0,N)|t=0|1.\displaystyle|\partial_{t}g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})-\partial_{t}g_{t}^{N}(% {\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})|_{t=0}|\leq 1.| ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) - ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ≤ 1 . (5.15)

For 𝐮0,NKsubscript𝐮0𝑁𝐾{\mathbf{u}}_{0,N}\in Kbold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_K, and 0tτ(K,N)0𝑡𝜏𝐾𝑁0\leq t\leq\tau(K,N)0 ≤ italic_t ≤ italic_τ ( italic_K , italic_N ), Taylor’s theorem implies

gtN(𝐮0,N)=1+t[(tgtN(𝐮0,N))|t=0+(tgtN(𝐮0,N))|t=t(tgtN(𝐮0,N))|t=0],superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁1𝑡delimited-[]evaluated-atsubscript𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁𝑡0evaluated-atsubscript𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁𝑡superscript𝑡evaluated-atsubscript𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁𝑡0\displaystyle g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})=1+t\big{[}(\partial_{t}g_{t}^{N}({% \mathbf{u}}_{0,N}))|_{t=0}+(\partial_{t}g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N}))|_{t=t^{% \prime}}-(\partial_{t}g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N}))|_{t=0}\big{]},italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 1 + italic_t [ ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) | start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] ,

for some 0tτ(K,N)0superscript𝑡𝜏𝐾𝑁0\leq t^{\prime}\leq\tau(K,N)0 ≤ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_τ ( italic_K , italic_N ). Then, (5.11) follows by using (5.15).

We move onto the claims regarding the set KR,Nsubscript𝐾𝑅𝑁K_{R,N}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Since the 𝒞αsuperscript𝒞𝛼\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT norm controls the Fourier coefficients of 𝐮0,Nsubscript𝐮0𝑁{\mathbf{u}}_{0,N}bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, KR,Nsubscript𝐾𝑅𝑁K_{R,N}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is bounded, and hence pre-compact. We now show the bound (5.13). Let τR:=τ(KR,N,N)assignsubscript𝜏𝑅𝜏subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁𝑁\tau_{R}:=\tau(K_{R,N},N)italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_τ ( italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N ). From (5.11), the inequality 1+xex1𝑥superscript𝑒𝑥1+x\leq e^{x}1 + italic_x ≤ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for any x𝑥x\in\mathbb{R}italic_x ∈ blackboard_R, (4.12), (4.4) and Cauchy-Schwarz, we have

gtN(𝐮0)\displaystyle\|g^{N}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})∥ italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) 𝟏KR,N(ΠN𝐮0)Lp(νs,N)pevaluated-atsubscript1subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁subscriptΠabsent𝑁subscript𝐮0superscript𝐿𝑝subscript𝜈𝑠𝑁𝑝\displaystyle\mathbf{1}_{K_{R,N}}(\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0})\|_{L^{p}(\vec{% \nu}_{s,N})}^{p}bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
|1+τR({H,s,N}(𝐮0,N)+1)|p𝟏KR,N(𝐮0,N)𝑑νs,Nabsentsuperscript1subscript𝜏𝑅𝐻subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁1𝑝subscript1subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁\displaystyle\leq\int|1+\tau_{R}(\{H,\mathcal{E}_{s,N}\}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})+1% )|^{p}\mathbf{1}_{K_{R,N}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}≤ ∫ | 1 + italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( { italic_H , caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 1 ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
epτR({H,s,N}(𝐮0,N)+1)𝟏KR,N(𝐮0,N)𝑑νs,Nabsentsuperscript𝑒𝑝subscript𝜏𝑅𝐻subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁1subscript1subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁\displaystyle\leq\int e^{p\tau_{R}(\{H,\mathcal{E}_{s,N}\}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})% +1)}\mathbf{1}_{K_{R,N}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}≤ ∫ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( { italic_H , caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Zs,N1epτReRs,N(𝐮)L2(μs)(e2pτR{H,s,N}(𝐮0,N)𝟏KR,N(𝐮0,N)𝑑μs,N)12.absentsuperscriptsubscript𝑍𝑠𝑁1superscript𝑒𝑝subscript𝜏𝑅subscriptnormsuperscript𝑒subscript𝑅𝑠𝑁𝐮superscript𝐿2subscript𝜇𝑠superscriptsuperscript𝑒2𝑝subscript𝜏𝑅𝐻subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁subscript1subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁differential-dsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁12\displaystyle\leq Z_{s,N}^{-1}e^{p\tau_{R}}\|e^{-R_{s,N}({\mathbf{u}})}\|_{L^{% 2}(\vec{\mu}_{s})}\bigg{(}\int e^{2p\tau_{R}\{H,\mathcal{E}_{s,N}\}({\mathbf{u% }}_{0,N})}\mathbf{1}_{K_{R,N}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})d\vec{\mu}_{s,N}\bigg{)}^{% \frac{1}{2}}.≤ italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∫ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_p italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { italic_H , caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (5.16)

Recall that for ϕC(𝕋2)italic-ϕsuperscript𝐶superscript𝕋2\phi\in C^{\infty}(\mathbb{T}^{2})italic_ϕ ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), the random variable vN,ϕsubscript𝑣𝑁italic-ϕ\langle v_{N},\phi\rangle⟨ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ϕ ⟩ is a centered complex-valued Gaussian with variance ΠNϕHs(𝕋2)2superscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptΠabsent𝑁italic-ϕsuperscript𝐻𝑠superscript𝕋22\|\Pi_{\leq N}\phi\|_{H^{-s}(\mathbb{T}^{2})}^{2}∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Moreover from (5.7), {H,s,N}𝐻subscript𝑠𝑁\{H,\mathcal{E}_{s,N}\}{ italic_H , caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } can be written as svN,𝒲(uN)superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscript𝑣𝑁𝒲subscript𝑢𝑁\langle\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}v_{N},\mathcal{W}(u_{N})\rangle⟨ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , caligraphic_W ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ⟩, where

𝒲(uN)=3[suNuN2]s(uN3)+3s(Qs,N(uN)uN).𝒲subscript𝑢𝑁3delimited-[]superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscript𝑢𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁2superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑢𝑁33superscriptdelimited-⟨⟩𝑠subscript𝑄𝑠𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁\displaystyle\mathcal{W}(u_{N})=3[\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}u_{N}\cdot u_{N}^{2}% ]-\langle\nabla\rangle^{s}(u_{N}^{3})+3\langle\nabla\rangle^{-s}(Q_{s,N}(u_{N}% )u_{N}).caligraphic_W ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 3 [ ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] - ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + 3 ⟨ ∇ ⟩ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) .

Thus, from (5.7) and the independence of the random variables vNsubscript𝑣𝑁v_{N}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and uNsubscript𝑢𝑁u_{N}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we have

e2pτR{H,s,N}(𝐮0,N)𝟏KR,N(𝐮0,N)𝑑μs,Nsuperscript𝑒2𝑝subscript𝜏𝑅𝐻subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁subscript1subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁differential-dsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁\displaystyle\int e^{2p\tau_{R}\{H,\mathcal{E}_{s,N}\}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})}% \mathbf{1}_{K_{R,N}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})d\vec{\mu}_{s,N}∫ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_p italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { italic_H , caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
𝟏π1KR,N(uN)e2pτR{H,s,N}(𝐮0,N)𝑑μs,N(vN)𝑑μs+1,N(uN)absentsubscript1subscript𝜋1subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁superscript𝑒2𝑝subscript𝜏𝑅𝐻subscript𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑁differential-dsubscript𝜇𝑠𝑁subscript𝑣𝑁differential-dsubscript𝜇𝑠1𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁\displaystyle\leq\int\mathbf{1}_{\pi_{1}K_{R,N}}(u_{N})\int e^{2p\tau_{R}\{H,% \mathcal{E}_{s,N}\}({\mathbf{u}}_{0,N})}d{\mu}_{s,N}(v_{N})d\mu_{s+1,N}(u_{N})≤ ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∫ italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_p italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { italic_H , caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s + 1 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
=𝟏π1KR,N(uN)e2(pτR)2𝒲(uN)L22𝑑μs+1,N(uN).absentsubscript1subscript𝜋1subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁superscript𝑒2superscript𝑝subscript𝜏𝑅2superscriptsubscriptnorm𝒲subscript𝑢𝑁superscript𝐿22differential-dsubscript𝜇𝑠1𝑁subscript𝑢𝑁\displaystyle=\int\mathbf{1}_{\pi_{1}K_{R,N}}(u_{N})e^{2(p\tau_{R})^{2}\|% \mathcal{W}(u_{N})\|_{L^{2}}^{2}}d\mu_{s+1,N}(u_{N}).= ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 ( italic_p italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ caligraphic_W ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s + 1 , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) .

It follows from (2.16), (2.19), and the definition of KR,Nsubscript𝐾𝑅𝑁K_{R,N}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, that there exists C>0𝐶0C>0italic_C > 0 such that

𝒲(uN)L22C(R6+R4).superscriptsubscriptnorm𝒲subscript𝑢𝑁superscript𝐿22𝐶superscript𝑅6superscript𝑅4\displaystyle\|\mathcal{W}(u_{N})\|_{L^{2}}^{2}\leq C(R^{6}+R^{4}).∥ caligraphic_W ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_C ( italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) .

for uNπ1KR,Nsubscript𝑢𝑁subscript𝜋1subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁u_{N}\in\pi_{1}K_{R,N}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Inserting this bound back into (5.16) and using (4.17) yields (5.13). ∎

5.3. Lifted Markov semigroups

For ε>0𝜀0\varepsilon>0italic_ε > 0 and 0<α<s0𝛼𝑠0<\alpha<s0 < italic_α < italic_s, we define the space

𝒵={ξCt1/2εCx1ε([0,)×𝕋2):\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)C([0,);Zα+s2)},𝒵conditional-set𝜉subscriptsuperscript𝐶12𝜀𝑡subscriptsuperscript𝐶1𝜀𝑥0superscript𝕋2subscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉𝐶0superscript𝑍𝛼𝑠2\displaystyle\mathcal{Z}=\{\xi\in C^{-1/2-\varepsilon}_{t}C^{-1-\varepsilon}_{% x}([0,\infty)\times\mathbb{T}^{2})\,:\,\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{% \leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\in C([0,\infty);Z^{\frac{\alpha+s}{2}})\},caligraphic_Z = { italic_ξ ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( [ 0 , ∞ ) × blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) : [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∈ italic_C ( [ 0 , ∞ ) ; italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_α + italic_s end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) } ,

with the norm

ξ𝒵:=ξC1/2ε([0,);C1ε)+\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)C([0,);Zα+s2).assignsubscriptnorm𝜉𝒵subscriptnorm𝜉superscript𝐶12𝜀0superscript𝐶1𝜀subscriptnormsubscript\@imakebox[4pt][c]  𝑡𝜉𝐶0superscript𝑍𝛼𝑠2\displaystyle\|\xi\|_{\mathcal{Z}}:=\|\xi\|_{C^{-1/2-\varepsilon}([0,\infty);C% ^{-1-\varepsilon})}+\|\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{% \set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\|_{C([0,\infty);Z^{\frac{\alpha+s}{2}})}.∥ italic_ξ ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := ∥ italic_ξ ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 / 2 - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( [ 0 , ∞ ) ; italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 - italic_ε end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( [ 0 , ∞ ) ; italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_α + italic_s end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

It is clear from (2.37) that (𝒵,𝒵)(\mathcal{Z},\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{Z}})( caligraphic_Z , ∥ ⋅ ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is a Polish space. We view Ξ:=Law(𝟏[0,)×𝕋2ξ)assignΞLawsubscript10superscript𝕋2𝜉\Xi:=\text{Law}(\mathbf{1}_{[0,\infty)\times\mathbb{T}^{2}}\xi)roman_Ξ := Law ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 0 , ∞ ) × blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) as a probability measure on 𝒵𝒵\mathcal{Z}caligraphic_Z. More precisely, for any F:𝒵:𝐹𝒵F:\mathcal{Z}\to\mathbb{R}italic_F : caligraphic_Z → blackboard_R, we have

F(u)𝑑Ξ(u)=𝔼[F(ξ)].𝐹𝑢differential-dΞ𝑢𝔼delimited-[]𝐹𝜉\displaystyle\int F(u)d\Xi(u)=\mathbb{E}[F(\xi)].∫ italic_F ( italic_u ) italic_d roman_Ξ ( italic_u ) = blackboard_E [ italic_F ( italic_ξ ) ] .

In the following proposition, we show that for each N20{}𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ }, the Markov semigroups {𝒫tN}t0subscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁𝑡0\{\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N}\}_{t\geq 0}{ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ≥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT lift to Markov semigroups on the product space (Xα×𝒵,νs,NΞ)superscript𝑋𝛼𝒵tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ(X^{\alpha}\times\mathcal{Z},\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × caligraphic_Z , over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ).

Proposition 5.3.

Given N20{}𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}\cup\{\infty\}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∪ { ∞ }, there exists a Markov semigroup 𝒰tNsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT on Xα×𝒵superscript𝑋𝛼𝒵X^{\alpha}\times\mathcal{Z}italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × caligraphic_Z such that

(𝒫tN)νs,NΞ=(𝒰tN)(νs,NΞ).tensor-productsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁subscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒰𝑡𝑁tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle(\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N})^{\ast}\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi=(\mathcal{U% }_{t}^{N})^{\ast}(\nu_{s,N}\otimes\Xi).( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ = ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) . (5.17)

Moreover, the Radon-Nikodym derivative

ftN(𝐮0,ξ):=d(𝒰tN)(νs,NΞ)d(νs,NΞ).assignsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒰𝑡𝑁tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle f_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi):=\frac{d(\mathcal{U}_{t}^{N})^{% \ast}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}{d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}.italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) := divide start_ARG italic_d ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_ARG . (5.18)

exists and is equal to gtN(𝐮0)superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) for almost every (𝐮0,ξ)subscript𝐮0𝜉({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) with respect to νs,NΞtensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xiover→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ, where gtNsuperscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁g_{t}^{N}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT was defined in (5.8).

Proof.

For Fb(Xα×𝒵)𝐹subscript𝑏superscript𝑋𝛼𝒵F\in\mathcal{B}_{b}(X^{\alpha}\times\mathcal{Z})italic_F ∈ caligraphic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × caligraphic_Z ), we define the operator 𝒰tN:b(Xα×𝒵)b(Xα×𝒵):subscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡subscript𝑏superscript𝑋𝛼𝒵subscript𝑏superscript𝑋𝛼𝒵\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}:\mathcal{B}_{b}(X^{\alpha}\times\mathcal{Z})\to\mathcal{B}% _{b}(X^{\alpha}\times\mathcal{Z})caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : caligraphic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × caligraphic_Z ) → caligraphic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × caligraphic_Z ) by

𝒰tNF(𝐮0,ξ)=F(ΦtN(𝐮0;ξ),Rt(𝟏[t,)ξ)),superscriptsubscript𝒰𝑡𝑁𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐹superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript𝑅𝑡subscript1𝑡𝜉\displaystyle\mathcal{U}_{t}^{N}F({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)=F(\Phi_{t}^{N}({% \mathbf{u}}_{0};\xi),R_{t}(\mathbf{1}_{[t,\infty)}\xi)),caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) , italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) ) , (5.19)

and claim that {𝒰tN}t0subscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒰𝑡𝑁𝑡0\{\mathcal{U}_{t}^{N}\}_{t\geq 0}{ caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ≥ 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a Markov semigroup. We only need to check the semigroup property. Note that Rt(𝟏[t,)ξ)=𝟏[0,)Rtξsubscript𝑅𝑡subscript1𝑡𝜉subscript10subscript𝑅𝑡𝜉R_{t}(\mathbf{1}_{[t,\infty)}\xi)=\mathbf{1}_{[0,\infty)}R_{t}\xiitalic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) = bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 0 , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ for any t𝑡t\in\mathbb{R}italic_t ∈ blackboard_R. Given t1,t20subscript𝑡1subscript𝑡20t_{1},t_{2}\geq 0italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≥ 0, and using (3.17) and (3.18), we have

𝒰t1+t2NF(𝐮0,ξ)superscriptsubscript𝒰subscript𝑡1subscript𝑡2𝑁𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉\displaystyle\mathcal{U}_{t_{1}+t_{2}}^{N}F({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) =F(Φt1+t2N(𝐮0;ξ),Rt1+t2(𝟏[t1+t2,)ξ))absent𝐹subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁subscript𝑡1subscript𝑡2subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript𝑅subscript𝑡1subscript𝑡2subscript1subscript𝑡1subscript𝑡2𝜉\displaystyle=F(\Phi^{N}_{t_{1}+t_{2}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0};\xi),R_{t_{1}+t_{2}}(% \mathbf{1}_{[t_{1}+t_{2},\infty)}\xi))= italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) , italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) )
=F(Φt1N(Φt2N(𝐮0;𝟏[0,t2]ξ);Rt2(𝟏[t2,)ξ)),Rt1𝟏[t1,)Rt2ξ)absent𝐹subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁subscript𝑡1subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁subscript𝑡2subscript𝐮0subscript10subscript𝑡2𝜉subscript𝑅subscript𝑡2subscript1subscript𝑡2𝜉subscript𝑅subscript𝑡1subscript1subscript𝑡1subscript𝑅subscript𝑡2𝜉\displaystyle=F(\Phi^{N}_{t_{1}}(\Phi^{N}_{t_{2}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0};\mathbf{1}_% {[0,t_{2}]}\xi);R_{t_{2}}(\mathbf{1}_{[t_{2},\infty)}\xi)),R_{t_{1}}\mathbf{1}% _{[t_{1},\infty)}R_{t_{2}}\xi)= italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 0 , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) ; italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) ) , italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ )
=F(Φt1N(Φt2N(𝐮0;ξ);𝟏[0,)Rt2ξ),Rt1𝟏[t1,)𝟏[0,)Rt2ξ)absent𝐹subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁subscript𝑡1subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁subscript𝑡2subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript10subscript𝑅subscript𝑡2𝜉subscript𝑅subscript𝑡1subscript1subscript𝑡1subscript10subscript𝑅subscript𝑡2𝜉\displaystyle=F(\Phi^{N}_{t_{1}}(\Phi^{N}_{t_{2}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0};\xi);% \mathbf{1}_{[0,\infty)}R_{t_{2}}\xi),R_{t_{1}}\mathbf{1}_{[t_{1},\infty)}% \mathbf{1}_{[0,\infty)}R_{t_{2}}\xi)= italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) ; bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 0 , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) , italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 0 , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ )
=𝒰t1N(F(Φt2N(𝐮0;ξ),Rt2𝟏[t2,)ξ))absentsuperscriptsubscript𝒰subscript𝑡1𝑁𝐹subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁subscript𝑡2subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript𝑅subscript𝑡2subscript1subscript𝑡2𝜉\displaystyle=\mathcal{U}_{t_{1}}^{N}\big{(}F(\Phi^{N}_{t_{2}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0% };\xi),R_{t_{2}}\mathbf{1}_{[t_{2},\infty)}\xi)\big{)}= caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_ξ ) , italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) )
=(𝒰t1N𝒰t2N)F(𝐮0,ξ).absentsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁subscript𝑡1superscriptsubscript𝒰subscript𝑡2𝑁𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉\displaystyle=(\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t_{1}}\circ\mathcal{U}_{t_{2}}^{N})F({\mathbf{% u}}_{0},\xi).= ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∘ caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) .

This proves the semigroup property.

We now show (5.17) and, at the same time, that this density is equal to gtNsuperscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁g_{t}^{N}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Note that for any t>0𝑡0t>0italic_t > 0, 𝟏[0,t]ξsubscript10𝑡𝜉\mathbf{1}_{[0,t]}\xibold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 0 , italic_t ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ and Rt𝟏[t,)ξsubscript𝑅𝑡subscript1𝑡𝜉R_{t}\mathbf{1}_{[t,\infty)}\xiitalic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ are independent. Then, given AXα𝐴superscript𝑋𝛼A\subseteq X^{\alpha}italic_A ⊆ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and B𝒵𝐵𝒵B\subseteq\mathcal{Z}italic_B ⊆ caligraphic_Z be measurable and using (5.10), we have

𝟏A×B(𝐮0,ξ)d(𝒰tN)(νs,NΞ)=𝟏A(ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))𝟏B(Rt𝟏[t,)ξ)𝑑Ξ𝑑νs,N=𝔼[𝟏A(ΦtN(𝐮0,𝟏[0,t]ξ))𝟏B(Rt𝟏[t,)ξ)]𝑑νs,N=𝔼[𝟏A(ΦtN(𝐮0,𝟏[0,t]ξ))]𝔼[𝟏B(Rt𝟏[t,)ξ)]𝑑νs,N=𝟏A×B(𝐮0,ξ)d((𝒫tN)νs,NΞ)=𝟏A×B(𝐮0,ξ)gtN(𝐮0)d(νs,NΞ).subscript1𝐴𝐵subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒰𝑡𝑁tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscript1𝐴superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1𝐵subscript𝑅𝑡subscript1𝑡𝜉differential-dΞdifferential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁𝔼delimited-[]subscript1𝐴subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript10𝑡𝜉subscript1𝐵subscript𝑅𝑡subscript1𝑡𝜉differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁𝔼delimited-[]subscript1𝐴subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0subscript10𝑡𝜉𝔼delimited-[]subscript1𝐵subscript𝑅𝑡subscript1𝑡𝜉differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁subscript1𝐴𝐵subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡𝑁subscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscript1𝐴𝐵subscript𝐮0𝜉superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle\begin{split}\int\mathbf{1}_{A\times B}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(% \mathcal{U}_{t}^{N})^{\ast}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)&=\int\mathbf{1}_{A}(% \Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))\mathbf{1}_{B}(R_{t}\mathbf{1}_{[t,\infty)}% \xi)d\Xi d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\\ &=\int\mathbb{E}\bigg{[}\mathbf{1}_{A}(\Phi^{N}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\mathbf{1% }_{[0,t]}\xi))\mathbf{1}_{B}(R_{t}\mathbf{1}_{[t,\infty)}\xi)\bigg{]}d\vec{\nu% }_{s,N}\\ &=\int\mathbb{E}\Big{[}\mathbf{1}_{A}(\Phi^{N}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\mathbf{1}% _{[0,t]}\xi))\Big{]}\mathbb{E}\Big{[}\mathbf{1}_{B}(R_{t}\mathbf{1}_{[t,\infty% )}\xi)\Big{]}d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\\ &=\int\mathbf{1}_{A\times B}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d((\mathcal{P}_{t}^{N})^{% \ast}\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)\\ &=\int\mathbf{1}_{A\times B}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})d% (\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi).\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A × italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) italic_d roman_Ξ italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ blackboard_E [ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 0 , italic_t ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) ] italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ blackboard_E [ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 0 , italic_t ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) ) ] blackboard_E [ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_t , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) ] italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A × italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( ( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A × italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) . end_CELL end_ROW (5.20)

As this identity is true for all such measurable sets A𝐴Aitalic_A and B𝐵Bitalic_B, we get that ftN=gtNsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁f_{t}^{N}=g_{t}^{N}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT a.e. ∎

In order to establish the absolute continuity result, we need to argue locally in the function spaces, which necessitates keeping track of the flow. For a fixed measurable set KXα𝐾superscript𝑋𝛼K\subseteq X^{\alpha}italic_K ⊆ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and t0𝑡0t\geq 0italic_t ≥ 0, we define

EtN,K:={(𝐮0,ξ):ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ)Kfor all  0tt}assignsuperscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾conditional-setsubscript𝐮0𝜉formulae-sequencesubscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁superscript𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐾for all  0superscript𝑡𝑡\displaystyle E_{t}^{N,K}:=\big{\{}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\,:\,\Phi^{N}_{t^{% \prime}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\in K\quad\text{for all}\,\,0\leq t^{\prime}\leq t% \big{\}}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT := { ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) : roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∈ italic_K for all 0 ≤ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_t } (5.21)

These sets behave well with respect to the Markov semigroup 𝒰tNsuperscriptsubscript𝒰𝑡𝑁\mathcal{U}_{t}^{N}caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the following sense.

Lemma 5.4.

For every t,τ0𝑡𝜏0t,\tau\geq 0italic_t , italic_τ ≥ 0, and KXα𝐾superscript𝑋𝛼K\subseteq X^{\alpha}italic_K ⊆ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT measurable, it holds that

𝟏Et+τN,K(𝐮0,ξ)=𝒰τN(𝟏EtN,K)(𝐮0,ξ)𝟏EτN,K(𝐮0,ξ).subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝜏𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉subscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝜏subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝜏𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉\displaystyle\mathbf{1}_{E_{t+\tau}^{N,K}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)=\mathcal{U}^{% N}_{\tau}(\mathbf{1}_{E_{t}^{N,K}})({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\mathbf{1}_{E_{\tau}^% {N,K}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi).bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t + italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) . (5.22)
Proof.

Suppose that (𝐮0,ξ)Et+τN,Ksubscript𝐮0𝜉superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝜏𝑁𝐾({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\in E_{t+\tau}^{N,K}( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∈ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t + italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Using (5.19), (5.21), and (3.18), we have

𝒰τN(𝟏EtN,K)(𝐮0,ξ)=𝟏EtN,K(ΦτN(𝐮0,ξ),Rτ(𝟏[τ,)ξ))=𝟏{ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ)Kt[τ,τ+t]}(𝐮0,ξ)=1.subscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝜏subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾superscriptsubscriptΦ𝜏𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript𝑅𝜏subscript1𝜏𝜉subscript1superscriptsubscriptΦsuperscript𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐾for-allsuperscript𝑡𝜏𝜏𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉1\displaystyle\mathcal{U}^{N}_{\tau}(\mathbf{1}_{E_{t}^{N,K}})({\mathbf{u}}_{0}% ,\xi)=\mathbf{1}_{E_{t}^{N,K}}(\Phi_{\tau}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi),R_{\tau}(% \mathbf{1}_{[\tau,\infty)}\xi))=\mathbf{1}_{\{\Phi_{t^{\prime}}^{N}({\mathbf{u% }}_{0},\xi)\in K\,\,\forall\,\,t^{\prime}\in[\tau,\tau+t]\}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},% \xi)=1.caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) , italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_τ , ∞ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ξ ) ) = bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT { roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∈ italic_K ∀ italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ [ italic_τ , italic_τ + italic_t ] } end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = 1 .

Moreover, by the inclusion

Et1N,KEt2N,Ksuperscriptsubscript𝐸subscript𝑡1𝑁𝐾superscriptsubscript𝐸subscript𝑡2𝑁𝐾\displaystyle E_{t_{1}}^{N,K}\subseteq E_{t_{2}}^{N,K}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊆ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (5.23)

for any 0t2t10subscript𝑡2subscript𝑡10\leq t_{2}\leq t_{1}0 ≤ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we have that 𝟏EτN,K(𝐮0,ξ)=1subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝜏𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉1\mathbf{1}_{E_{\tau}^{N,K}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)=1bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = 1.

Next, assume that (𝐮0,ξ)Et+τN,Ksubscript𝐮0𝜉superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝜏𝑁𝐾({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\notin E_{t+\tau}^{N,K}( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∉ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t + italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Then, there is a t0[0,τ+t]subscript𝑡00𝜏𝑡t_{0}\in[0,\tau+t]italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ [ 0 , italic_τ + italic_t ] such that Φt0N(𝐮0,ξ)KsuperscriptsubscriptΦsubscript𝑡0𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐾\Phi_{t_{0}}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\notin Kroman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∉ italic_K. If t0[0,τ]subscript𝑡00𝜏t_{0}\in[0,\tau]italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ [ 0 , italic_τ ], then 𝟏EτN,K(𝐮0,ξ)=0subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝜏𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉0\mathbf{1}_{E_{\tau}^{N,K}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)=0bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = 0. If instead t0(τ,τ+t]subscript𝑡0𝜏𝜏𝑡t_{0}\in(\tau,\tau+t]italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ ( italic_τ , italic_τ + italic_t ], then 𝒰τN(𝟏EtN,K)(𝐮0,ξ)=0subscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝜏subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉0\mathcal{U}^{N}_{\tau}(\mathbf{1}_{E_{t}^{N,K}})({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)=0caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = 0. ∎

We now obtain an analogue of Proposition 5.3 for the localised measures (νs,NΞ)𝟏EtN,Ktensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)\mathbf{1}_{E_{t}^{N,K}}( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Lemma 5.5.

Let N𝑁N\in\mathbb{N}italic_N ∈ blackboard_N, KXα𝐾superscript𝑋𝛼K\subseteq X^{\alpha}italic_K ⊆ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT be measurable, t0𝑡0t\geq 0italic_t ≥ 0, and EtN,Ksuperscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾E_{t}^{N,K}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT be as in (5.21). Then, the measure (𝒰tN)((νs,NΞ)𝟏EtN,K)superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒰𝑡𝑁tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾(\mathcal{U}_{t}^{N})^{\ast}((\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)\mathbf{1}_{E_{t}^{N,K% }})( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) has a density with respect to the probability measure νs,NΞtensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xiover→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ and we set

ftN,K(𝐮0,ξ):=d(𝒰tN)((νs,NΞ)𝟏EtN,K)d(νs,NΞ).assignsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝒰𝑡𝑁tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle f_{t}^{N,K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi):=\frac{d(\mathcal{U}_{t}^{N})^% {\ast}((\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)\mathbf{1}_{E_{t}^{N,K}})}{d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}% \otimes\Xi)}.italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) := divide start_ARG italic_d ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_ARG . (5.24)

In particular, the following properties hold:

(i) ftN,K(𝐮0,ξ)0superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉0f_{t}^{N,K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\geq 0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ≥ 0 for νs,NΞtensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xiover→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ almost every (𝐮0,ξ)subscript𝐮0𝜉({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ),

(ii) ftN,K(𝐮0,ξ)=0superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉0f_{t}^{N,K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)=0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) = 0 for almost every (𝐮0,ξ)(XαK)×𝒵subscript𝐮0𝜉superscript𝑋𝛼𝐾𝒵({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\in(X^{\alpha}\setminus K)\times\mathcal{Z}( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∈ ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∖ italic_K ) × caligraphic_Z,

(iii) ftN,K(𝐮0,ξ)gtN(𝐮0)superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0f_{t}^{N,K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\leq g_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ≤ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) for almost every (𝐮0,ξ)subscript𝐮0𝜉({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ).

Proof.

The existence of (5.24) and consequently (i) is immediate from the existence of ftNsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁f_{t}^{N}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT which we showed in Proposition 5.3. We move onto showing the properties (ii) and (iii). First, by the definition (5.24) we have

F(𝐮0,ξ)ftN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle\int F({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)f_{t}^{N,K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(% \vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)∫ italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) =(𝒰tNF)(𝐮0,ξ)𝟏EtN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)absentsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle=\int(\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}F)({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\mathbf{1}_{E_{t% }^{N,K}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)= ∫ ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) (5.25)

for any Fb(Xα×𝒵)𝐹subscript𝑏superscript𝑋𝛼𝒵F\in\mathcal{B}_{b}(X^{\alpha}\times\mathcal{Z})italic_F ∈ caligraphic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × caligraphic_Z ). By choosing F=𝟏XαK(𝐮0)𝐹subscript1superscript𝑋𝛼𝐾subscript𝐮0F=\mathbf{1}_{X^{\alpha}\setminus K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})italic_F = bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∖ italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) in (5.25) and noting that EtN,Ksuperscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾E_{t}^{N,K}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is disjoint from {ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ)(XαK)×𝒵}subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉superscript𝑋𝛼𝐾𝒵\{\Phi^{N}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\in(X^{\alpha}\setminus K)\times\mathcal{Z}\}{ roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∈ ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∖ italic_K ) × caligraphic_Z }, we obtain

𝟏XαK(𝐮0)ftN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)=0.subscript1superscript𝑋𝛼𝐾subscript𝐮0superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ0\displaystyle\int\mathbf{1}_{X^{\alpha}\setminus K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})f_{t}^{N,% K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)=0.∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∖ italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) = 0 . (5.26)

Property (ii) now follows from property (i) and that ftN,K0superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾0f_{t}^{N,K}\geq 0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≥ 0.

We move onto showing property (iii). For Fb(Xα×𝒵)𝐹subscript𝑏superscript𝑋𝛼𝒵F\in\mathcal{B}_{b}(X^{\alpha}\times\mathcal{Z})italic_F ∈ caligraphic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × caligraphic_Z ) such that F0𝐹0F\geq 0italic_F ≥ 0, (5.25), (5.23) and (5.19), we have

F(𝐮0,ξ)ftN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)=(𝒰tNF)(𝐮0,ξ)𝟏EtN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)(𝒰tNF)(𝐮0,ξ)𝟏K(ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))d(νs,NΞ)=𝒰tN(F𝟏K)(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)=F(𝐮0,ξ)𝟏K(𝐮0)ftN(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)=F(𝐮0,ξ)𝟏K(𝐮0)gtN(𝐮0)d(νs,NΞ),𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1𝐾superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡𝐹subscript1𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1𝐾subscript𝐮0superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1𝐾subscript𝐮0superscriptsubscript𝑔𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle\begin{split}\int F({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)f_{t}^{N,K}({\mathbf{u}}% _{0},\xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)&=\int(\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}F)({\mathbf{u}}% _{0},\xi)\mathbf{1}_{E_{t}^{N,K}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}% \otimes\Xi)\\ &\leq\int(\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}F)({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\mathbf{1}_{K}(\Phi_{t}^{% N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)\\ &=\int\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}(F\mathbf{1}_{K})({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s% ,N}\otimes\Xi)\\ &=\int F({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\mathbf{1}_{K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})f_{t}^{N}({% \mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)\\ &=\int F({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\mathbf{1}_{K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})g_{t}^{N}({% \mathbf{u}}_{0})d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi),\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ∫ italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≤ ∫ ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_F bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) , end_CELL end_ROW (5.27)

which proves (iii). ∎

5.4. Lpsuperscript𝐿𝑝L^{p}italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bounds on densities

The key ingredient for the proof of Theorem 1.1 is the following long-time Lpsuperscript𝐿𝑝L^{p}italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bounds on the truncated densities ftN,Ksuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾f_{t}^{N,K}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Proposition 5.6 (Uniform long-time bounds on densities).

Let s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0, 0<α<s0𝛼𝑠0<\alpha<s0 < italic_α < italic_s be as in Lemma 5.2, T>0𝑇0T>0italic_T > 0, R>0𝑅0R>0italic_R > 0, and KRsubscript𝐾𝑅K_{R}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT be as in (5.12). Then, it holds that

supN20supt[0,T]ftN,KRLq(νs,NΞ)C(R,T,q)subscriptsupremum𝑁superscript2subscript0subscriptsupremum𝑡0𝑇subscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁subscript𝐾𝑅superscript𝐿𝑞tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ𝐶𝑅𝑇𝑞\displaystyle\sup_{N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}}\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\|f_{t}^{N,K_{R}}\|% _{L^{q}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}\leq C(R,T,q)roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_T ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_C ( italic_R , italic_T , italic_q ) (5.28)

for any 1q<1𝑞1\leq q<\infty1 ≤ italic_q < ∞.

Proof.

To simplify the notation, we write K𝐾Kitalic_K in place of KRsubscript𝐾𝑅K_{R}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. First, we will prove that

ft+τN,KLr(νs,NΞ)fτN,KLp(νs,NΞ)ftN,KLr(p1)pr(νs,NΞ)1p,subscriptdelimited-∥∥superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝜏𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑟tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptdelimited-∥∥superscriptsubscript𝑓𝜏𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsuperscriptsubscriptdelimited-∥∥superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑟𝑝1𝑝𝑟tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ1superscript𝑝\displaystyle\begin{split}\|f_{t+\tau}^{N,K}\|_{L^{r}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes% \Xi)}\leq\big{\|}f_{\tau}^{N,K}\big{\|}_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}\big% {\|}f_{t}^{N,K}\big{\|}_{L^{\frac{r(p-1)}{p-r}}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}^{% \frac{1}{p^{\prime}}},\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t + italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_r ( italic_p - 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_p - italic_r end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , end_CELL end_ROW (5.29)

for any 0<τ,t<Tformulae-sequence0𝜏𝑡𝑇0<\tau,t<T0 < italic_τ , italic_t < italic_T such that t+τT𝑡𝜏𝑇t+\tau\leq Titalic_t + italic_τ ≤ italic_T and 1r<p<1𝑟𝑝1\leq r<p<\infty1 ≤ italic_r < italic_p < ∞.

Let FCb(Xα×𝒵)𝐹subscript𝐶𝑏superscript𝑋𝛼𝒵F\in C_{b}(X^{\alpha}\times\mathcal{Z})italic_F ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × caligraphic_Z ). Then, by (5.22), the semigroup property of 𝒰tNsuperscriptsubscript𝒰𝑡𝑁\mathcal{U}_{t}^{N}caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, (5.23), and Hölder’s inequality,

\displaystyle\int F(𝐮0,ξ)ft+τN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝜏𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle F({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)f_{t+\tau}^{N,K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(% \vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t + italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ )
=(𝒰t+τNF)(𝐮0,ξ)𝟏Et+τN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)absentsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡𝜏𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝐸𝑁𝐾𝑡𝜏subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle=\int(\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t+\tau}F)({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\mathbf{1}_% {E^{N,K}_{t+\tau}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)= ∫ ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t + italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t + italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ )
=𝒰τN(𝒰tNF)(𝐮0,ξ)𝒰τN(𝟏EtN,K)(𝐮0,ξ)𝟏EτN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)absentsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝜏subscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉subscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝜏subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝐸𝑁𝐾𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝐸𝑁𝐾𝜏subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle=\int\mathcal{U}^{N}_{\tau}(\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}F)({\mathbf{u}}_{0% },\xi)\mathcal{U}^{N}_{\tau}(\mathbf{1}_{E^{N,K}_{t}})({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)% \mathbf{1}_{E^{N,K}_{\tau}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)= ∫ caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ )
=𝒰τN((𝒰tNF)𝟏EtN,K)(𝐮0,ξ)𝟏EτN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)absentsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝜏subscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡𝐹subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝐸𝑁𝐾𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝐸𝑁𝐾𝜏subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle=\int\mathcal{U}^{N}_{\tau}((\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}F)\mathbf{1}_{E^{% N,K}_{t}})({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\mathbf{1}_{E^{N,K}_{\tau}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},% \xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)= ∫ caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ )
=fτN,K(𝐮0,ξ)(𝒰tNF)(𝐮0,ξ)𝟏EtN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)absentsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝜏𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉subscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝐸𝑁𝐾𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle=\int f_{\tau}^{N,K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)(\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}F)(% {\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\mathbf{1}_{E^{N,K}_{t}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\nu}% _{s,N}\otimes\Xi)= ∫ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ )
fτN,KLp(νs,NΞ)(𝒰tNF)𝟏EtN,KLp(νs,NΞ).absentsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝜏𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptnormsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡𝐹subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝐸𝑁𝐾𝑡superscript𝐿superscript𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle\leq\big{\|}f_{\tau}^{N,K}\big{\|}_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes% \Xi)}\big{\|}(\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}F)\mathbf{1}_{E^{N,K}_{t}}\big{\|}_{L^{p^{% \prime}}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}.≤ ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (5.30)

Now using the definition (5.19) and (5.22), we have

(𝒰tNF)𝟏EtN,KLq(νs,NΞ)qsuperscriptsubscriptnormsubscriptsuperscript𝒰𝑁𝑡𝐹subscript1subscriptsuperscript𝐸𝑁𝐾𝑡superscript𝐿𝑞tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ𝑞\displaystyle\big{\|}(\mathcal{U}^{N}_{t}F)\mathbf{1}_{E^{N,K}_{t}}\big{\|}_{L% ^{q}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}^{q}∥ ( caligraphic_U start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =𝒰tN(|F|q)𝟏EtN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)absentsuperscriptsubscript𝒰𝑡𝑁superscript𝐹𝑞subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐸𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle=\int\mathcal{U}_{t}^{N}(|F|^{q})\mathbf{1}_{E_{t}^{N,K}}({% \mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)= ∫ caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( | italic_F | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ )
=|F(𝐮0,ξ)|qftN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ).absentsuperscript𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑞superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle=\int|F({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)|^{q}f_{t}^{N,K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},% \xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi).= ∫ | italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) . (5.31)

for any 1q<1𝑞1\leq q<\infty1 ≤ italic_q < ∞. Using (5.31) in (5.30), we then have

\displaystyle\int F(𝐮0,ξ)ft+τN,K(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ)𝐹subscript𝐮0𝜉superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝜏𝑁𝐾subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle F({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)f_{t+\tau}^{N,K}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(% \vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t + italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ )
fτN,KLp(νs,NΞ)F(ftN,K)1pLp(νs,NΞ)absentsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝜏𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptnorm𝐹superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾1superscript𝑝superscript𝐿superscript𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle\leq\big{\|}f_{\tau}^{N,K}\big{\|}_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes% \Xi)}\big{\|}F\cdot(f_{t}^{N,K})^{\frac{1}{p^{\prime}}}\big{\|}_{L^{p^{\prime}% }(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}≤ ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_F ⋅ ( italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
fτN,KLp(νs,NΞ)FLr(νs,NΞ)(ftN,K)1pLrppr(νs,NΞ)absentsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝜏𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptnorm𝐹superscript𝐿superscript𝑟tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptnormsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾1superscript𝑝superscript𝐿𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑟tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle\leq\big{\|}f_{\tau}^{N,K}\big{\|}_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes% \Xi)}\|F\|_{L^{r^{\prime}}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}\big{\|}(f_{t}^{N,K})^{% \frac{1}{p^{\prime}}}\big{\|}_{L^{\frac{rp}{p-r}}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}≤ ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_F ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ ( italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_r italic_p end_ARG start_ARG italic_p - italic_r end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
=fτN,KLp(νs,NΞ)FLr(νs,NΞ)ftN,KLr(p1)pr(νs,NΞ)1p.absentsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝜏𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptnorm𝐹superscript𝐿superscript𝑟tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsuperscriptsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑟𝑝1𝑝𝑟tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ1superscript𝑝\displaystyle=\big{\|}f_{\tau}^{N,K}\big{\|}_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)% }\|F\|_{L^{r^{\prime}}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}\big{\|}f_{t}^{N,K}\big{\|}_% {L^{\frac{r(p-1)}{p-r}}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}^{\frac{1}{p^{\prime}}}.= ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_F ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_r ( italic_p - 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_p - italic_r end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

Thus, by duality we establish (5.29).

We now iterate (5.29). We choose the time-step 0<τ=τR:=τ(KR,N)10𝜏subscript𝜏𝑅assign𝜏subscript𝐾𝑅𝑁10<\tau=\tau_{R}:=\tau(K_{R},N)\leq 10 < italic_τ = italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_τ ( italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_N ) ≤ 1 from Lemma 5.2 and break the time interval [0,T]0𝑇[0,T][ 0 , italic_T ] into J=Tτ𝐽𝑇𝜏J=\left\lceil\frac{T}{\tau}\right\rceilitalic_J = ⌈ divide start_ARG italic_T end_ARG start_ARG italic_τ end_ARG ⌉ many sub-intervals of width τR>0subscript𝜏𝑅0\tau_{R}>0italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0. We let tj:=jτRassignsubscript𝑡𝑗𝑗subscript𝜏𝑅t_{j}:=j\tau_{R}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT := italic_j italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for j=0,1,,J𝑗01𝐽j=0,1,\ldots,Jitalic_j = 0 , 1 , … , italic_J, and note that 0jτRT0𝑗subscript𝜏𝑅𝑇0\leq j\tau_{R}\leq T0 ≤ italic_j italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_T. For ε0>0subscript𝜀00\varepsilon_{0}>0italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 to be chosen sufficiently small, we define p:=1ε0τR>1assign𝑝1subscript𝜀0subscript𝜏𝑅1p:=\frac{1}{\varepsilon_{0}\tau_{R}}>1italic_p := divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG > 1 and the sequence {rj}j=1Jsuperscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑟𝑗𝑗1𝐽\{r_{j}\}_{j=1}^{J}{ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT recursively by

r1=3qandrj+1=rjpp+rj1.formulae-sequencesubscript𝑟13𝑞andsubscript𝑟𝑗1subscript𝑟𝑗𝑝𝑝subscript𝑟𝑗1\displaystyle r_{1}=3q\quad\text{and}\quad r_{j+1}=\frac{r_{j}\,p}{p+r_{j}-1}.italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 italic_q and italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_ARG start_ARG italic_p + italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG .

Note that 1<rj+1<rj1subscript𝑟𝑗1subscript𝑟𝑗1<r_{j+1}<r_{j}1 < italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for all j=1,,J1𝑗1𝐽1j=1,\ldots,J-1italic_j = 1 , … , italic_J - 1 and rj=rj+1(p1)prj+1subscript𝑟𝑗subscript𝑟𝑗1𝑝1𝑝subscript𝑟𝑗1r_{j}=\frac{r_{j+1}(p-1)}{p-r_{j+1}}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_p - 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_p - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG. Using that the sequence {rj}j=1Jsuperscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑟𝑗𝑗1𝐽\{r_{j}\}_{j=1}^{J}{ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is decreasing, we have

r1rJ=j=1J1(rjrj+1)=j=1J1rj(rj1)p+rj1r12pJr12ε0T.subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟𝐽superscriptsubscript𝑗1𝐽1subscript𝑟𝑗subscript𝑟𝑗1superscriptsubscript𝑗1𝐽1subscript𝑟𝑗subscript𝑟𝑗1𝑝subscript𝑟𝑗1superscriptsubscript𝑟12𝑝𝐽superscriptsubscript𝑟12subscript𝜀0𝑇\displaystyle r_{1}-r_{J}=\sum_{j=1}^{J-1}(r_{j}-r_{j+1})=\sum_{j=1}^{J-1}% \frac{r_{j}(r_{j}-1)}{p+r_{j}-1}\leq\frac{r_{1}^{2}}{p}J\leq r_{1}^{2}% \varepsilon_{0}T.italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_p + italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 1 end_ARG ≤ divide start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG italic_J ≤ italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T .

Thus, by choosing

ε0=ε0(q,T)=min(12q1,min(9T,1)9Tq)>0,subscript𝜀0subscript𝜀0𝑞𝑇12𝑞19𝑇19𝑇𝑞0\displaystyle\varepsilon_{0}=\varepsilon_{0}(q,T)=\min\big{(}\tfrac{1}{2q-1},% \tfrac{\min(9T,1)}{9Tq}\big{)}>0,italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q , italic_T ) = roman_min ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_q - 1 end_ARG , divide start_ARG roman_min ( 9 italic_T , 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG 9 italic_T italic_q end_ARG ) > 0 ,

we ensure that p2q1q𝑝2𝑞1𝑞p\geq 2q-1\geq qitalic_p ≥ 2 italic_q - 1 ≥ italic_q and r1rJqsubscript𝑟1subscript𝑟𝐽𝑞r_{1}-r_{J}\leq qitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_q. In particular, rJ2qsubscript𝑟𝐽2𝑞r_{J}\geq 2qitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≥ 2 italic_q. For j=1,,J1𝑗1𝐽1j=1,\ldots,J-1italic_j = 1 , … , italic_J - 1, (5.29) implies

ftj+1N,KLrj+1(νs,NΞ)subscriptnormsubscriptsuperscript𝑓𝑁𝐾subscript𝑡𝑗1superscript𝐿subscript𝑟𝑗1tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle\|f^{N,K}_{t_{j+1}}\|_{L^{r_{j+1}}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}∥ italic_f start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT fτRN,KLp(νs,NΞ)ftjN,KLrj(νs,NΞ)1pabsentsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓subscript𝜏𝑅𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsuperscriptsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓subscript𝑡𝑗𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿subscript𝑟𝑗tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ1superscript𝑝\displaystyle\leq\|f_{\tau_{R}}^{N,K}\|_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}\big% {\|}f_{t_{j}}^{N,K}\big{\|}_{L^{r_{j}}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}^{\frac{1}{p% ^{\prime}}}≤ ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

Therefore,

ftjN,KLrj(νs,NΞ)fτRN,KLp(νs,NΞ)k=0j1(p)k,subscriptnormsubscriptsuperscript𝑓𝑁𝐾subscript𝑡𝑗superscript𝐿subscript𝑟𝑗tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsuperscriptsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓subscript𝜏𝑅𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsuperscriptsubscript𝑘0𝑗1superscriptsuperscript𝑝𝑘\displaystyle\|f^{N,K}_{t_{j}}\|_{L^{r_{j}}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}\leq\|f% _{\tau_{R}}^{N,K}\|_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}^{\sum_{k=0}^{j}\frac{1}% {(p^{\prime})^{k}}},∥ italic_f start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,

for each j=1,,J𝑗1𝐽j=1,\ldots,Jitalic_j = 1 , … , italic_J. As

k=01(p)k=111p=p,superscriptsubscript𝑘01superscriptsuperscript𝑝𝑘111𝑝𝑝\displaystyle\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(p^{\prime})^{k}}=\frac{1}{1-\frac{1}% {p}}=p,∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_ARG = italic_p ,

Hölder’s inequality then implies

maxj=1,,JftjN,KL2q(νs,NΞ)max(1,fτRN,KLp(νs,NΞ)J).subscript𝑗1𝐽subscriptnormsubscriptsuperscript𝑓𝑁𝐾subscript𝑡𝑗superscript𝐿2𝑞tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ1superscriptsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓subscript𝜏𝑅𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ𝐽\displaystyle\max_{j=1,\ldots,J}\|f^{N,K}_{t_{j}}\|_{L^{2q}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}% \otimes\Xi)}\leq\max\big{(}1,\|f_{\tau_{R}}^{N,K}\|_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}% \otimes\Xi)}^{J}\big{)}.roman_max start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 , … , italic_J end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ roman_max ( 1 , ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . (5.32)

Now recalling that we chose p𝑝pitalic_p such that pτR=ε01𝑝subscript𝜏𝑅superscriptsubscript𝜀01p\tau_{R}=\varepsilon_{0}^{-1}italic_p italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and using Lemma 5.5 (ii)-(iii), Proposition 5.3, and (5.13), we have

fτRN,KRLp(νs,NΞ)JgτRN𝟏KR(𝐮0)Lp(νs,N)JgτRN𝟏ΠNKR(ΠN𝐮0)Lp(νs,N)J=(gτRN𝟏KR,N(ΠN𝐮0)Lp(νs,N)p)Jpc0ε0Texp(C(R)Tε01)=:C~(R,T,q),\displaystyle\begin{split}\|f_{\tau_{R}}^{N,K_{R}}\|_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}% \otimes\Xi)}^{J}&\leq\|g_{\tau_{R}}^{N}\mathbf{1}_{K_{R}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})\|_% {L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N})}^{J}\\ &\leq\|g_{\tau_{R}}^{N}\mathbf{1}_{\Pi_{\leq N}K_{R}}(\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}% _{0})\|_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N})}^{J}\\ &=\big{(}\|g_{\tau_{R}}^{N}\mathbf{1}_{K_{R,N}}(\Pi_{\leq N}{\mathbf{u}}_{0})% \|_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N})}^{p}\big{)}^{\frac{J}{p}}\\ &\leq c_{0}^{\varepsilon_{0}T}\exp(C(R)T\varepsilon_{0}^{-1})=:\widetilde{C}(R% ,T,q),\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ≤ ∥ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≤ ∥ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_J end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ( ∥ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_J end_ARG start_ARG italic_p end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≤ italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_exp ( italic_C ( italic_R ) italic_T italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = : over~ start_ARG italic_C end_ARG ( italic_R , italic_T , italic_q ) , end_CELL end_ROW (5.33)

uniformly in N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Returning this bound to (5.32), establishes that

maxj=1,,JftjN,KL2q(νs,NΞ)C~(R,T,q)subscript𝑗1𝐽subscriptnormsubscriptsuperscript𝑓𝑁𝐾subscript𝑡𝑗superscript𝐿2𝑞tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ~𝐶𝑅𝑇𝑞\displaystyle\max_{j=1,\ldots,J}\|f^{N,K}_{t_{j}}\|_{L^{2q}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}% \otimes\Xi)}\leq\widetilde{C}(R,T,q)roman_max start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 , … , italic_J end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ over~ start_ARG italic_C end_ARG ( italic_R , italic_T , italic_q ) (5.34)

uniformly in N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Now we obtain Lqsuperscript𝐿𝑞L^{q}italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bounds for every t[0,T]𝑡0𝑇t\in[0,T]italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_T ]. Let t[0,T]𝑡0𝑇t\in[0,T]italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_T ] and assume that t𝑡titalic_t is not an integer multiple of τRsubscript𝜏𝑅\tau_{R}italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. If t(0,τR)𝑡0subscript𝜏𝑅t\in(0,\tau_{R})italic_t ∈ ( 0 , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), then Lemma 5.5 (ii)-(iii), Proposition 5.3, (5.13) imply

supt[0,τR]ftN,KLp(νs,NΞ)C~(R,T,q)subscriptsupremum𝑡0subscript𝜏𝑅subscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ~𝐶𝑅𝑇𝑞\displaystyle\sup_{t\in[0,\tau_{R}]}\|f_{t}^{N,K}\|_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}% \otimes\Xi)}\leq\widetilde{C}(R,T,q)roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ over~ start_ARG italic_C end_ARG ( italic_R , italic_T , italic_q ) (5.35)

uniformly in N20𝑁superscript2subscript0N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Now we assume that t>τR𝑡subscript𝜏𝑅t>\tau_{R}italic_t > italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. There is a k𝑘k\in\mathbb{N}italic_k ∈ blackboard_N (depending on N𝑁Nitalic_N) such that kτR<t<(k+1)τR𝑘subscript𝜏𝑅𝑡𝑘1subscript𝜏𝑅k\tau_{R}<t<(k+1)\tau_{R}italic_k italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_t < ( italic_k + 1 ) italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. By repeating the arguments leading to (5.29), we find that

ftN,KLr(νs,NΞ)ftkτRN,KLp(νs,NΞ)fkτRN,KLr(p1)pr(νs,NΞ)1psubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑟tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑘subscript𝜏𝑅𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑝tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsuperscriptsubscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑘subscript𝜏𝑅𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑟𝑝1𝑝𝑟tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ1superscript𝑝\displaystyle\|f_{t}^{N,K}\|_{L^{r}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}\leq\|f_{t-k% \tau_{R}}^{N,K}\|_{L^{p}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}\|f_{k\tau_{R}}^{N,K}\|_{L% ^{{\frac{r(p-1)}{p-r}}}(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)}^{\frac{1}{p^{\prime}}}∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t - italic_k italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_r ( italic_p - 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_p - italic_r end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

for any 1r<p<1𝑟𝑝1\leq r<p<\infty1 ≤ italic_r < italic_p < ∞. We choose r=2qpp+2q1𝑟2𝑞𝑝𝑝2𝑞1r=\frac{2qp}{p+2q-1}italic_r = divide start_ARG 2 italic_q italic_p end_ARG start_ARG italic_p + 2 italic_q - 1 end_ARG so that r(p1)pr=2q𝑟𝑝1𝑝𝑟2𝑞\frac{r(p-1)}{p-r}=2qdivide start_ARG italic_r ( italic_p - 1 ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_p - italic_r end_ARG = 2 italic_q. Moreover, since p2q1𝑝2𝑞1p\geq 2q-1italic_p ≥ 2 italic_q - 1, we have rq𝑟𝑞r\geq qitalic_r ≥ italic_q. It now follows from (5.34), (5.35), and Hölder’s inequality that

supN20ftN,KLq(νs,NΞ)C~(R,T,q)2subscriptsupremum𝑁superscript2subscript0subscriptnormsuperscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁𝐾superscript𝐿𝑞tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ~𝐶superscript𝑅𝑇𝑞2\displaystyle\sup_{N\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}}\|f_{t}^{N,K}\|_{L^{q}(\vec{\nu}_{s% ,N}\otimes\Xi)}\leq\widetilde{C}(R,T,q)^{2}roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∥ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ over~ start_ARG italic_C end_ARG ( italic_R , italic_T , italic_q ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (5.36)

As t[0,T]𝑡0𝑇t\in[0,T]italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_T ] was arbitrary, (5.35) and (5.36) complete the proof of (5.28). ∎

5.5. Proof of Theorem 1.1

Let s>0𝑠0s>0italic_s > 0, 0<α<s0𝛼𝑠0<\alpha<s0 < italic_α < italic_s be as in Lemma 5.2. Let T>0𝑇0T>0italic_T > 0. For L1𝐿1L\geq 1italic_L ≥ 1, define the set

DT,Lsubscript𝐷𝑇𝐿\displaystyle D_{T,L}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T , italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT :={(𝐮0,ξ)Xα×𝒵:\displaystyle:=\Big{\{}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\in X^{\alpha}\times\mathcal{Z}\,:\,:= { ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∈ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × caligraphic_Z :
supM20supt[0,T](Qs,M(π1Φtlin(𝐮0,ξ))Hαs+ΠMΦtlin(𝐮0,ξ)𝒞α+ΠM\@imakebox[4pt][c]  t(ξ)Zα)L}.\displaystyle\sup_{M\in 2^{\mathbb{N}_{0}}}\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\Big{(}\|Q_{s,M}(% \pi_{1}\Phi^{\text{lin}}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))\|_{H^{\alpha-s}}+\|\Pi_{% \leq M}\Phi_{t}^{\text{lin}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\|_{\mathcal{C}^{\alpha}}+\|% \Pi_{\leq M}\mathchoice{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color% \@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{\raisebox{-1.0pt}{\leavevmode\hbox{\set@color\@imakebox[4pt][c]{ \leavevmode\hbox to3.4pt{\vbox to9.7pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 1% .7pt\lower-0.5pt\hbox to0.0pt{\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\definecolor{% pgfstrokecolor}{rgb}{0,0,0}\pgfsys@color@rgb@stroke{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@color@rgb@fill{0}{0}{0}\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{0.4pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces\nullfont\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }% \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hbox to0.0pt{% \pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }{\ignorespaces}\ignorespaces{\ignorespaces}% \ignorespaces {}{{}}{} {}{}\pgfsys@beginscope\pgfsys@invoke{ }\pgfsys@setlinewidth{1.0pt}% \pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{0.0pt}\pgfsys@lineto{0.0% pt}{6.0pt}\pgfsys@stroke\pgfsys@invoke{ }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{}{{}}{}{{{}}{\ignorespaces}% {}{\ignorespaces}{}{}{}{}{}}{}\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@moveto{1.5pt% }{7.5pt}\pgfsys@curveto{1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{0.0pt}{9.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-0.82843pt}{9.0pt}{-1.5pt}{8.32843pt}{-1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{-1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{-0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{0.0pt}{6.0pt}% \pgfsys@curveto{0.82843pt}{6.0pt}{1.5pt}{6.67157pt}{1.5pt}{7.5pt}% \pgfsys@closepath\pgfsys@moveto{0.0pt}{7.5pt}\pgfsys@fillstroke\pgfsys@invoke{% }\ignorespaces \pgfsys@invoke{\lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope{\ignorespaces}{% \ignorespaces}{\ignorespaces}\hss}\pgfsys@discardpath\pgfsys@invoke{% \lxSVG@closescope }\pgfsys@endscope\hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}} }}}}{}{}_{t}(\xi)\|_{Z^{\alpha}}\Big{)}\leq L\Big{\}}.roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_M ∈ 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ [ 0 , italic_T ] end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∥ italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α - italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT lin end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∥ roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [4pt][c] start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ξ ) ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ≤ italic_L } .

and let 0<α<α0superscript𝛼𝛼0<\alpha^{\prime}<\alpha0 < italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < italic_α be sufficiently close to α𝛼\alphaitalic_α so that (s,α)𝑠superscript𝛼(s,\alpha^{\prime})( italic_s , italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) also satisfy the conditions in Lemmas 4.4, 4.5, and 5.2. Then, for any FCb(α(𝕋2))𝐹subscript𝐶𝑏superscriptsuperscript𝛼superscript𝕋2F\in C_{b}(\mathcal{H}^{\alpha^{\prime}}(\mathbb{T}^{2}))italic_F ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( blackboard_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) such that F0𝐹0F\geq 0italic_F ≥ 0, Lemma 3.2, and Lemma 4.1 imply

F(𝐮0)d(𝒫t)νs=(𝒫tF)(𝐮0)𝑑νs=𝔼[F(Φt(𝐮0,ξ))]𝑑νs=limN𝔼[F(ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))]𝑑νs=limN𝔼[F(ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))]𝑑νs,N=limNF(ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))d(νs,NΞ)lim supN𝟏DT,L(𝐮0,ξ)F(ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))d(νs,NΞ)+lim supN𝟏DT,Lc(𝐮0,ξ)F(ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))d(νs,NΞ).𝐹subscript𝐮0𝑑superscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡subscript𝜈𝑠subscript𝒫𝑡𝐹subscript𝐮0differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠𝔼delimited-[]𝐹subscriptΦ𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠subscript𝑁𝔼delimited-[]𝐹subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠subscript𝑁𝔼delimited-[]𝐹subscriptsuperscriptΦ𝑁𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉differential-dsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁subscript𝑁𝐹superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptlimit-supremum𝑁subscript1subscript𝐷𝑇𝐿subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐹superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscriptlimit-supremum𝑁subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐷𝑇𝐿𝑐subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐹superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle\begin{split}\int F({\mathbf{u}}_{0})d(\mathcal{P}_{t})^{\ast}% \vec{\nu}_{s}&=\int(\mathcal{P}_{t}F)({\mathbf{u}}_{0})d\vec{\nu}_{s}\\ &=\int\mathbb{E}\big{[}F(\Phi_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))\big{]}d\vec{\nu}_{s}% \\ &=\lim_{N\to\infty}\int\mathbb{E}\big{[}F(\Phi^{N}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))% \big{]}d\vec{\nu}_{s}\\ &=\lim_{N\to\infty}\int\mathbb{E}\big{[}F(\Phi^{N}_{t}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))% \big{]}d\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\\ &=\lim_{N\to\infty}\int F(\Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}% \otimes\Xi)\\ &\leq\limsup_{N\to\infty}\int\mathbf{1}_{D_{T,L}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)F(\Phi_% {t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)\\ &\hphantom{X}+\limsup_{N\to\infty}\int\mathbf{1}_{D_{T,L}^{c}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0% },\xi)F(\Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi).\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ∫ italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d ( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ ( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ) ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ blackboard_E [ italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = roman_lim start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N → ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ blackboard_E [ italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = roman_lim start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N → ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ blackboard_E [ italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) ] italic_d over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = roman_lim start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N → ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≤ lim sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N → ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T , italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL + lim sup start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N → ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T , italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) . end_CELL end_ROW (5.37)

It follows by Markov’s inequality with (3.7), (2.40), (4.18), (4.24) that

|𝟏DT,Lc(𝐮0,ξ)F(ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))d(νs,NΞ)|C(T,s,α)FLL.subscript1superscriptsubscript𝐷𝑇𝐿𝑐subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐹superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ𝐶𝑇𝑠𝛼subscriptnorm𝐹superscript𝐿𝐿\displaystyle\bigg{|}\int\mathbf{1}_{D_{T,L}^{c}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)F(\Phi_% {t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)\bigg{|}\leq\frac{C(% T,s,\alpha)\|F\|_{L^{\infty}}}{L}.| ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T , italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) | ≤ divide start_ARG italic_C ( italic_T , italic_s , italic_α ) ∥ italic_F ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_L end_ARG . (5.38)

From Lemma 4.4 and Lemma 4.5, we see that if (𝐮0,ξ)DT,Lsubscript𝐮0𝜉subscript𝐷𝑇𝐿({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\in D_{T,L}( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∈ italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T , italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, then (𝐮0,ξ)EtN,K~C(L,T)subscript𝐮0𝜉subscriptsuperscript𝐸𝑁subscript~𝐾𝐶𝐿𝑇𝑡({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)\in E^{N,\widetilde{K}_{C(L,T)}}_{t}( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ∈ italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , over~ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_L , italic_T ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where K~C(L,T)subscript~𝐾𝐶𝐿𝑇\widetilde{K}_{C(L,T)}over~ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_L , italic_T ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a set of the same form as KRsubscript𝐾𝑅K_{R}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in (5.12) but with radius C(L,T)𝐶𝐿𝑇C(L,T)italic_C ( italic_L , italic_T ) and α𝛼\alphaitalic_α replaced by αsuperscript𝛼\alpha^{\prime}italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Consequently,

𝟏DT,L(𝐮0,ξ)F(ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))d(νs,NΞ)𝟏EtN,K~C(L,T)(𝐮0,ξ)F(ΦtN(𝐮0,ξ))d(νs,NΞ)=F(𝐮0)ftN,K~C(L,T)(𝐮0,ξ)d(νs,NΞ).subscript1subscript𝐷𝑇𝐿subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐹superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξsubscript1subscriptsuperscript𝐸𝑁subscript~𝐾𝐶𝐿𝑇𝑡subscript𝐮0𝜉𝐹superscriptsubscriptΦ𝑡𝑁subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ𝐹subscript𝐮0superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁subscript~𝐾𝐶𝐿𝑇subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜈𝑠𝑁Ξ\displaystyle\begin{split}\int&\mathbf{1}_{D_{T,L}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)F(% \Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)\\ &\leq\int\mathbf{1}_{E^{N,\widetilde{K}_{C(L,T)}}_{t}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)F(% \Phi_{t}^{N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi))d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi)\\ &=\int F({\mathbf{u}}_{0})f_{t}^{N,\widetilde{K}_{C(L,T)}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},% \xi)d(\vec{\nu}_{s,N}\otimes\Xi).\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL ∫ end_CELL start_CELL bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T , italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL ≤ ∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , over~ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_L , italic_T ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_F ( roman_Φ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∫ italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , over~ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_L , italic_T ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) . end_CELL end_ROW (5.39)

It follows from (5.28) that, up to a subsequence,

ftN,K~C(R,L,T)(𝐮0,ξ)Zs,N1eRs,N(𝐮0)superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑁subscript~𝐾𝐶𝑅𝐿𝑇subscript𝐮0𝜉superscriptsubscript𝑍𝑠𝑁1superscript𝑒subscript𝑅𝑠𝑁subscript𝐮0\displaystyle f_{t}^{N,\widetilde{K}_{C(R,L,T)}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)Z_{s,N}^% {-1}e^{-R_{s,N}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N , over~ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_R , italic_L , italic_T ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

converges weakly in L2(d(μsΞ))superscript𝐿2𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜇𝑠ΞL^{2}(d(\vec{\mu}_{s}\otimes\Xi))italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) ) to some element 𝔣tK~C(L,T)L2(d(μsΞ))superscriptsubscript𝔣𝑡subscript~𝐾𝐶𝐿𝑇superscript𝐿2𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜇𝑠Ξ\mathfrak{f}_{t}^{\widetilde{K}_{C(L,T)}}\in L^{2}(d(\vec{\mu}_{s}\otimes\Xi))fraktur_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over~ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_L , italic_T ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) ). It then follows from (5.37), (5.38), and (5.39) that

F(𝐮0)d(𝒫t)νsF(𝐮0)𝔣tK~C(L,T)(𝐮0,ξ)d(μsΞ)+C(T,s,α)FLL.𝐹subscript𝐮0𝑑subscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡subscript𝜈𝑠𝐹subscript𝐮0superscriptsubscript𝔣𝑡subscript~𝐾𝐶𝐿𝑇subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜇𝑠Ξ𝐶𝑇𝑠𝛼subscriptnorm𝐹superscript𝐿𝐿\displaystyle\int F({\mathbf{u}}_{0})d(\mathcal{P}_{t})_{\ast}\vec{\nu}_{s}% \leq\int F({\mathbf{u}}_{0})\mathfrak{f}_{t}^{\widetilde{K}_{C(L,T)}}({\mathbf% {u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\mu}_{s}\otimes\Xi)+\tfrac{C(T,s,\alpha)\|F\|_{L^{\infty}}% }{L}.∫ italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d ( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ ∫ italic_F ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) fraktur_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over~ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_L , italic_T ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) + divide start_ARG italic_C ( italic_T , italic_s , italic_α ) ∥ italic_F ∥ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_L end_ARG . (5.40)

By density of continuous, bounded functions in

L1((𝒫t)νs+(π1)𝔣tK~C(L,T)(𝐮0,ξ)d(μsΞ)),superscript𝐿1subscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡subscript𝜈𝑠subscriptsubscript𝜋1superscriptsubscript𝔣𝑡subscript~𝐾𝐶𝐿𝑇subscript𝐮0𝜉𝑑tensor-productsubscript𝜇𝑠ΞL^{1}\big{(}(\mathcal{P}_{t})_{\ast}\vec{\nu}_{s}+(\pi_{1})_{\ast}\mathfrak{f}% _{t}^{\widetilde{K}_{C(L,T)}}({\mathbf{u}}_{0},\xi)d(\vec{\mu}_{s}\otimes\Xi)% \big{)},italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ( italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT fraktur_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over~ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_L , italic_T ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ξ ) italic_d ( over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ roman_Ξ ) ) ,

we can extend (5.40) to hold for all Fb(Xα)𝐹subscript𝑏superscript𝑋𝛼F\in\mathcal{B}_{b}(X^{\alpha})italic_F ∈ caligraphic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ). Let EXα𝐸superscript𝑋𝛼E\subset X^{\alpha}italic_E ⊂ italic_X start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT be a Borel set such that μs(E)=0subscript𝜇𝑠𝐸0\vec{\mu}_{s}(E)=0over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_E ) = 0. Therefore, by (5.40), we obtain

𝟏E(𝐮0)d(𝒫t)νsC(T,s,α)L,subscript1𝐸subscript𝐮0𝑑subscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡subscript𝜈𝑠𝐶𝑇𝑠𝛼𝐿\displaystyle\int\mathbf{1}_{E}({\mathbf{u}}_{0})d(\mathcal{P}_{t})_{\ast}\vec% {\nu}_{s}\leq\tfrac{C(T,s,\alpha)}{L},∫ bold_1 start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d ( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ divide start_ARG italic_C ( italic_T , italic_s , italic_α ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_L end_ARG ,

for every L1𝐿1L\geq 1italic_L ≥ 1. By taking L𝐿L\to\inftyitalic_L → ∞, we obtain that (𝒫t)νs(E)=0subscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡subscript𝜈𝑠𝐸0(\mathcal{P}_{t})_{\ast}\vec{\nu}_{s}(E)=0( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_E ) = 0. Since this holds for every E𝐸Eitalic_E with μs(E)=0subscript𝜇𝑠𝐸0\vec{\mu}_{s}(E)=0over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_E ) = 0, we deduce that (𝒫t)μs(𝒫t)νsμsmuch-less-thansubscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡subscript𝜇𝑠subscriptsubscript𝒫𝑡subscript𝜈𝑠much-less-thansubscript𝜇𝑠(\mathcal{P}_{t})_{\ast}\vec{\mu}_{s}\ll(\mathcal{P}_{t})_{\ast}\vec{\nu}_{s}% \ll\vec{\mu}_{s}( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ ( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≪ over→ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Acknowledgements.

J. F. acknowledges support from Tadahiro Oh’s ERC consolidator grant (grant no. 864138 “SingStochDispDyn”).

References

  • [1] N. Barashkov, M. Gubinelli, A variational method for Φ34subscriptsuperscriptΦ43\Phi^{4}_{3}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Duke Math. J. 169 (2020), no. 17, 3339–3415.
  • [2] N. Barashkov, M. Gubinelli, The Φ34subscriptsuperscriptΦ43\Phi^{4}_{3}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT measure via Girsanov’s theorem, Electron. J. Probab. 26(2021), Paper No. 81, 29 pp.
  • [3] H. Bahouri, J.Y. Chemin, R. Danchin, Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations, Vol. 343. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
  • [4] V. I. Bogachev, N. V. Krylov, M. Röckner, S. V. Shaposhnikov, Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equations, Math. Surveys Monogr., 207 American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015. xii+479 pp.
  • [5] M. Boué, P. Dupuis, A variational representation for certain functionals of Brownian motion, Ann. Probab. 26 (1998), no. 4, 1641–1659.
  • [6] J. Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 176(2): 421-445 (1996).
  • [7] N. Burq, L. Thomann, Almost sure scattering for the one dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 296(2024), no.1480, vii+87 pp.
  • [8] N. Burq, N. Tzvetkov, Random data Cauchy theory for supercritical wave equations. II. A global existence result, Invent. Math. 173 (2008), no. 3, 477–496.
  • [9] A. Chandra, A. Moinat, H. Weber, A priori bounds for the Φ4superscriptΦ4\Phi^{4}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT equation in the full sub-critical regime, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.247(2023), no.3, Paper No. 48, 76 pp.
  • [10] J. Coe, L. Tolomeo, Sharp quasi-invariance threshold for the cubic Szegö equation, arXiv:2404.14950 [math.AP].
  • [11] G. Da Prato, A. Debussche, Two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations driven by a space-time white noise, J. Funct. Anal. 196 (2002), no. 1, 180–210.
  • [12] G. Da Prato, J. Zabczyk, Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions, Second edition. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 152. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014. xviii+493 pp. ISBN: 978-1-107-05584-1.
  • [13] A. Debussche, Y. Tsutsumi, Quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures transported by the cubic NLS with third-order dispersion on 𝐓𝐓\mathbf{T}bold_T, J. Funct. Anal. 281 (2021), no. 3, 109032, 23 pp.
  • [14] A. Eberle, A. Guillin, R. Zimmer, Couplings and quantitative contraction rates for Langevin dynamics, Ann. Probab. 47 (2019), no. 4, 1982–2010.
  • [15] B. Ferrario, Ergodic results for stochastic Navier-Stokes equation, Stochastics and Stochastics Reports 60 (1997), 271–288.
  • [16] F. Flandoli, B. Maslowski, Ergodicity of the 2-D Navier-Stokes equation under random perturbations, Comm. Math. Phys. 172 (1995), no. 1, 119–141.
  • [17] J. Forlano, K. Seong, Transport of Gaussian measures under the flow of one-dimensional fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Comm. PDE, 47 (2022), no. 6, 1296–1337.
  • [18] J. Forlano, L. Tolomeo, On the unique ergodicity for a class of 2 dimensional stochastic wave equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 377 (2024), 345–394.
  • [19] J. Forlano, L. Tolomeo, Quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures of negative regularity for fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations, arXiv:2205.11453 [math.AP].
  • [20] J. Forlano, W. J. Trenberth, On the transport of Gaussian measures under the one-dimensional fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 36 (2019), no. 7, 1987–2025.
  • [21] G. Genovese, R. Lucá, N. Tzvetkov, Transport of Gaussian measures with exponential cut-off for Hamiltonian PDEs, J. Anal. Math.150(2023), no.2, 737–787.
  • [22] G. Genovese, R. Lucá, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures for the periodic Benjamin-Ono-BBM equation, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput.11(2023), no.2, 651–684.
  • [23] M. Gubinelli, M. Hofmanov’a, Global solutions to elliptic and parabolic Φ4superscriptΦ4\Phi^{4}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT models in Euclidean space, Comm. Math. Phys. 368 (2019), no. 3, 1201–1266.
  • [24] M. Gubinelli, M. Hofmanov’a, A PDE construction of the Euclidean Φ34subscriptsuperscriptΦ43\Phi^{4}_{3}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT quantum field theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 384 (2021), 1–75.
  • [25] M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh, Renormalization of the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), no 10, 7335–7359.
  • [26] M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh, Paracontrolled approach to the three-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equation with quadratic nonlinearity, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 26 (2024), no. 3, 817–874.
  • [27] M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh, L. Tolomeo, Global dynamics for the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equations, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2021), rnab084, https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnab084.
  • [28] T. Gunaratnam, T. Oh, N. Tzvetkov, H. Weber, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the nonlinear wave equation in three dimensions, Probab. Math. Phys. 3 (2022), no. 2, 343–379.
  • [29] M. Hairer, S. Kusuoka, H. Nagoji, Singularity of solutions to singular SPDEs, arXiv:2409.10037 [math.PR]
  • [30] R. Killip, J. Murphy, M. Vişan, Invariance of white noise for KdV on the line, Invent. Math. 222 (2020), no. 1, 203–282.
  • [31] A. Knezevitch, Transport of low regularity Gaussian measures for the 1d quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation arXiv:2406.07116 [math.AP].
  • [32] J. C. Mattingly, T. M. Suidan, The small scales of the stochastic Navier-Stokes equations under rough forcing, J. Stat. Phys. 118 (2005), no. 1–2, 343–364.
  • [33] J.-C. Mourrat, H. Weber, The dynamic Φ34subscriptsuperscriptΦ43\Phi^{4}_{3}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model comes down from infinity, Comm. Math. Phys. 356 (2017), no. 3, 673–753.
  • [34] H. P. McKean, Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equations. IV. Cubic Schrödinger, Comm. Math. Phys. 168 (1995), no. 3, 479–491. Erratum: Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equations. IV. Cubic Schrödinger, Comm. Math. Phys. 173 (1995), no. 3, 675.
  • [35] T. Oh, M. Okamoto, L. Tolomeo, Focusing Φ43superscriptΦ43\Phi^{4}{3}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 model with a Hartree nonlinearity, to appear in Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.
  • [36] T. Oh, M. Okamoto, L. Tolomeo, Stochastic quantisation of the Φ33superscriptΦ33\Phi^{3}{3}roman_Φ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3-model, to appear in Mem. Eur. Math. Soc.
  • [37] T. Oh, K. Seong, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth order nonlinear Schrödinger equation in negative Sobolev spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 281 (2021), no. 9, 109150, 49 pp.
  • [38] T. Oh, P. Sosoe, N. Tzvetkov, An optimal regularity result on the quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth order nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Éc. polytech. Math. 5 (2018), 793–841.
  • [39] T. Oh, Y. Tsutsumi, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation with third order dispersion, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 357 (2019), no. 4, 366–381.
  • [40] T. Oh, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth order nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Probab. Theory Related Fields 169 (2017), 1121–1168.
  • [41] T. Oh, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the two-dimensional defocusing cubic nonlinear wave equation, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 22 (2020), no. 6, 1785–1826.
  • [42] T. Oh, Y. Wang, Y. Zine, Three-dimensional stochastic cubic nonlinear wave equation with almost space-time white noise, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput.10(2022), no.3, 898–963.
  • [43] F. Planchon, N. Tzvetkov, N. Visciglia, Transport of Gaussian measures by the flow of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Math. Ann. 378 (2020), no. 1-2, 389–423.
  • [44] F. Planchon, N. Tzvetkov, N. Visciglia, Modified energies for the periodic generalized KdV equation and applications, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire 40 (2023), no.4, 863–917.
  • [45] P. Sosoe, W. Trenberth, T. Xian, Quasi-invariance of fractional Gaussian fields by the nonlinear wave equation with polynomial nonlinearity, Differential Integral Equations 33 (2020), no. 7-8, 393–430.
  • [46] B. Simon, The P(Φ)2𝑃Φ2P(\Phi)2italic_P ( roman_Φ ) 2 Euclidean (quantum) field theory, Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1974. xx+392 pp
  • [47] D. Revuz, M. Yor, Continuous martingales and Brownian motion. Third edition, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 293. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. xiv+602 pp. ISBN: 3-540-64325-7.
  • [48] C. Sun, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures for the 3d energy critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation, arXiv:2308.12758 [math.AP].
  • [49] L. Thomann, N. Tzvetkov, Gibbs measure for the periodic derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Nonlinearity 23 (2010), no. 11, 2771–2791.
  • [50] L. Tolomeo, Global well-posedness of the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equation on an unbounded domain, Ann. Probab. 49(3): 1402-1426 (May 2021).
  • [51] L. Tolomeo, Unique ergodicity for a class of stochastic hyperbolic equations with additive space-time white noise, Comm. Math. Phys. 377 (2020), no. 2, 1311–1347.
  • [52] L. Tolomeo, Ergodicity for the hyperbolic P(Φ)2𝑃subscriptΦ2P(\Phi)_{2}italic_P ( roman_Φ ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-model, arXiv:2310.02190 [math.PR].
  • [53] N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for one dimensional Hamiltonian PDE’s, Forum Math. Sigma 3 (2015), e28, 35 pp.
  • [54] A.  Üstünel, Variational calculation of Laplace transforms via entropy on Wiener space and applications, J. Funct. Anal. 267 (2014), no. 8, 3058–3083.