Asymmetric drift in MaNGA: Mass and radially-dependent stratification rates in galaxy disks

The kinematic and spectrophotometric measurements used in this paper are based on the final SDSS-IV Data Release 17 (DR17; Abdurro’uf et al., 2022) products for MaNGA described in more detail in papers describing the DAP Westfall et al. (2019); Belfiore et al. (2019). The spectral resolution is $\sim$67 $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$ ($\sigma$). The median spatial resolution is $1.4$ arcsec, varying as a function of mass given the MaNGA sample selection (Wake et al., 2017); 75% of the sample has a resolution between 1.1 and 2.1 arcsec, while 90% of the sample has a resolution between 0.8 and 3.4 arcsec. Most relevant for the current analysis is that the distribution of apparent half-light radii is independence of mass. Given the extent of the analysis involved, however, the sample is limited to the set of galaxies processed in SDSS-IV Data Release 14 (Abolfathi et al., 2018), which consists of 2744 unique observations of galaxies with MaNGA IFUs. Because we are interested in measuring kinematics in specific geometric regions of each galaxy (see Section 3) we eschew the Voronoi-binned data and use only the spaxel-based DAP data products, which for DR17 correspond to the data-type SPX-MILESHC-MASTARSSP. For this data-type the stellar and ionized gas kinematics were determined with pPXF  (Cappellari, 2017) and a hierarchically-clustered (Westfall et al., 2019, Sec. 5) set of template stars from the Miles (Falcón-Barroso et al., 2011) stellar library.¹¹1This results in 42 templates, with no preselection on age or metallicity. One of the advantages of relying only on velocities (versus higher moments) for our analysis is that the details of the stellar template constructions are relatively unimportant. We also use the DAP’s measure of $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  (as defined by Balogh et al., 1999) and ionized gas fluxes. In addition to the DAP, we made use of the photometry (we adopt Petrosian magnitudes) and Sersic index provided by the NASA-Sloan Atlas (NSA, Blanton et al., 2011).

We expect AD to be measurable in all galaxies with detectable dense gas, but if significant kinematic irregularities or asymmetries are present, this likely prevents the measurement of an accurate AD signal. The DAP kinematics were used to select galaxies on the basis of the regularity of both stellar and ionized gas velocity fields. To make this assessment for such a large galaxy sample, and in order to be quantitative, we fit simple kinematic models to all 2744 galaxies in the DR14 MaNGA sample in an automated way. The kinematic fitting is based on the scheme developed by Westfall et al. (2011) and Andersen & Bershady (2013) using a single, inclined disk model with smooth axisymmetric tangential motion and a radial trend described by $V(r)=V_{\rm rot}~{}\tanh(R/h_{\rm rot})$. The fitting solves for the geometric and kinematic parameters. The scheme is extended here to fit ionized gas and stellar velocity fields simultaneously with the same geometry (center, inclination, position angle) while allowing for the rotation curve parameters ($V_{\rm rot},h_{\rm rot}$) and systemic velocity to be independent. We perform 12 velocity-field fits for each galaxy: (1) four fits are permutations of fixing and freeing the center and inclination and (2) each of these four fits is done when only fitting the ionized gas data, only fitting the stellar data, and fitting both tracers simultaneously. Fits with fixed geometric parameters adopt photometric values parameters provided by the NSA.

The purpose of the multiple fitting permutations is to assess the stability of both the kinematic and geometric parameters constrained by different sets of tracers. Based on visual inspection of a subset of cases for a range of variation in fitted parameters we assessed quantitative limits to derive a kinematically regular sample. We find it is useful to limit variation between permutations and tracers on the systemic velocity, kinematic center, position angle, and inclination. Our AD-$\sigma$ analysis is of galaxies that satisfy the following set of constraints on the results from the velocity field fitting:

(i) When the two velocity fields are fitted simultaneously, the differences between the systemic velocities fit to the ionized gas and stellar velocity fields must be within $\sim 7$ $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$  (absolute value) for all four of the fit permutations.

(ii) In the two simultaneous fits to the ionized gas and stellar data with the dynamical center left free, the dynamical center must be within half of the imposed bounding box on the morphological center. The bounding box is set to $\pm$(1,2,2,3,3) arcsec for IFUs with (19,37,61,91,127) fibers respectively.

(iii) For all the relevant fit permutations, the difference between the ionied-gas-only and stellar-only fitted position angles must be less than 15^∘.

(iv) In all six fits when the inclination is freely fit, the best-fitting kinematic inclination must be in the range $15^{\circ}<i_{\rm kin}<80^{\circ}$. The difference between the ionized-gas-only and stellar only kinematic inclinations must be less than $20^{\circ}$ both with and without a fixed center. When both tracers are fit simultaneously, the kinematic inclination must also be within $20^{\circ}$ of photometric inclination derived from the standard formula using $\epsilon=1-b/a$ and an intrinsic oblateness $q_{0}=1/8$ characteristic of spiral galaxies (e.g., Padilla & Strauss, 2008): $\cos^{2}i_{\rm phot}=[(1-\epsilon^{2})-q_{0}^{2}]/(1-q_{0}^{2})$.

The simultaneous application of all these cuts yields a sample of 798 galaxies with regular kinematics. Visual inspection of these galaxies resulted in a further culling to eliminate 192 objects that appear too inclined for reliable kinematics and colors due to uncertainties in internal extinction corrections. This visual inspection removes a subset of galaxies with a median inclination of $\sim 66^{\circ}$, including all galaxies with photometric inclinations above 70^∘. The same visual inspection also identified an additional 109 objects for removal because they had either too low in continuum or line S/N to have adequately sampled stellar or ionized gas velocity fields, respectively, despite the fitting process described above. The following analysis uses the remaining 497 galaxies (18% of the parent sample).

The distribution of this sample in relation to the parent sample in the $NUV-r$ – $M_{i}$ color-magnitude diagram (CMD) is shown in Figure 1. Unsurprisingly, highly-inclined systems are preferentially at redder colors and lower absolute magnitude due to uncorrected internal-extinction. The low-S/N galaxies tend to be found at the peripheries of the CMD distribution at low luminosity or red color. Examples of the galaxy morphology are shown in Figure 2 and 3 for a range of Sersic index, unbarred and barred (based on our visual inspection). These Figures shows that in our sample the high-index galaxies still have disks, concluding that the high-index values are due to the light-weighted nature of the one-zone Sersic model, i.e., the high Sersic indices are a measure of the profile shape of the inner light concentration.

Figure 1 also shows that barred and unbarred galaxies in our sample have similar distributions in color total stellar mass. Despite the kinematics of the barred galaxies having sufficient regularity to meet our sample selection criteria, the bar perturbations to the velocity field are evident, particularly at small radii in Figure 3. Since our measurements avoid the inner regions due to beam smearing, described in the following section, a priori it was not clear if the bar perturbations would be problematic to our analysis. For example, Stark et al. (2018) found inner position-angle twists that appeared to be associated with bars typically occurred within $r_{50}/2$, where $r_{50}$ is the half-light radius; this radius is within the smallest radial bin we consider (Section 3). We therefore initially retain the barred sample with the intent to determine if there are systematic differences in the stratification properties in barred and unbarred galaxies. In the end, our expectations turn out to be too optimistic; we eliminate barred galaxies (roughly a quarter of the sample) in our tertiary analysis (Section 5.3.2 and onward).

Asymmetric drift ($V_{a}$) is defined as the lag between the tangential speed of the stars ($V_{\phi,*}$) and the circular speed of the potential: $V_{a}\equiv V_{c}-V_{\phi,*}$. We define an effective velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ as the quadrature difference between the above quantities:

The two quantities $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ and $V_{a}$ are tightly correlated. In our data the correlation is characterized well by a slope of 1.5 between $\log V_{a}$ versus $\log\sigma_{\rm AD}$, with a zeropoint of $V_{a}/\sigma_{\rm AD}\sim 1/4$ when $\sigma_{\rm AD}=100$ $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$, i.e., where $V_{a}\sim 25$ $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$. Median values of $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ and $V_{a}$ for our sample are 70 and 16.5 $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$, respectively.

For the purpose of this work we adopt the ionized gas tangential velocity ($V_{\phi,g}$) as a proxy for $V_{c}$ and determine if any correction for pressure support is warranted. This correction is in the same sense as asymmetric drift, i.e., $V_{\phi,g}<V_{c}$, but arises for different physical reasons. For cool and cold gas, corrections for pressure support are minimal (of order a few $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$) and difficult to determine, and hence typically are ignored (e.g., Swaters, 1999). For the warm ISM component, traced by ionized gas, Andersen et al. (2006) have shown that the median H$\alpha$ line-width is $\sim 18$ $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$ in late-type spirals; this amounts to a negligible correction to $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ for $V_{a}$ as small as 10 to 20 $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$ (e.g., Westfall et al., 2011). This is consistent with the $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$-level agreement between HI and H$\alpha$ rotation curves for galaxies in the DiskMass Survey (Bershady et al., 2010), as shown in Martinsson et al. (2013). However, the MaNGA sample is more heterogeneous and displays a larger range of $\sigma_{g}$. Recent comparisons of CO and H$\alpha$ tangential velocities for a sample including MaNGA galaxies suggest modest corrections to the ionized galaxies velocities are needed in some cases where the gas dispersion is high (Su et al., 2022). We develop and implement a correction for the ionized gas velocities in Section 3.3.

The inclined-disk fits used to select our sample also provide the rotation amplitude ($V_{\rm rot}$), the scale of the inner-rise of the rotation curve ($h_{\rm rot}$), and the kinematic position angle and inclination. The $\tanh$ rotation curve model is a rather simplistic description of the tangential motion, but it serves well to characterize the velocity gradients in the data, particularly at small radii. We measure the AD signal and other quantities directly from the data, examples of which are shown for AD in Shetty et al. (2020).

To deproject the observed spaxels to their relative radial and azimuthal positions on the galaxy we adopt the mean of the photometric and kinematic inclination, and the kinematic position angle. We use spaxels within $\pm 40^{\circ}$ of the kinematic major axis (in the disk plane) to keep corrections for azimuthal projection to below 25% while having a sufficiently broad wedge to sample an ample number of spaxels in each data-cube. The observed, line-of-sight radial velocities $V_{\rm los}$ for each spaxel are deprojected in the usual manner to derive the deprojected tangential speed $V=(V_{\rm los}-V_{\rm sys})/(\cos\theta\sin i)$, where $V_{\rm sys}$ is the systemic velocity of each galaxy, and $\theta$ is the azimuthal angle in the disk plane for each spaxel.

We then compute weighted moments with $5\sigma$ clipping of the distributions of kinematic measurements made for individual spaxels, grouped in nested radial rings, 2 arcsec in width. The choice of width minimizes spatial covariance in data-cubes grided at $0.5\times 0.5$ arcsec² from data sampled with 2 arcsec diameter fibers. An example of our binning and spaxel-based computations is given in Appendix A and Figure 15. We determine the error-weighted mean of $\sigma_{\rm AD}^{2}$ computed spaxel by spaxel, as defined in Equation 1. We stress this is not the same as taking the difference of the square of the mean stellar and gas velocities, i.e., $\langle V_{\phi,g}^{2}-V_{\phi,\ast}^{2}\rangle$ is not the same as $\langle V_{\phi,g}^{2}\rangle-\langle V_{\phi,\ast}^{2}\rangle$. The former, in addition to being the correct formulation, has the practical advantage of enabling robust statistics and allowing for assessment of the spaxel-level distributions for measurements in the rare cases where the error-weighted mean of $\sigma_{\rm AD}^{2}$ is negative. These negative values are discarded from further analysis, and hence is a ‘survival’ bias. However, this ‘survival bias’ is inconsequential to the results of our analysis because the number of negative measurements are small (a few % of the total).

We also compute the mean $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  values as well as emission-line ratios for [O III]/H$\beta$, [N II]/H$\alpha$ and [S II]/H$\alpha$ for the corresponding spaxels in each ring. We adopt $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  as an age proxy, and present its conversion and calibration to a light-weighted mean age in Section 3.4. We use the emission-line flux ratios in Section 3.3 to estimate a correction to the gas velocity for pressure support. Since the $\sigma_{AD}$ kinematics are the paramount measure, often with the largest errors, and to avoid bias with different weightings, all mean values (specifically, emission-line ratios in Section 3.3 and stellar population ages in Section 3.4) are error-weighted using the inverse variance of $\sigma_{AD}$.

The total number of usable independent measurements from this sample is 2877 – on average five to six measures per galaxy. We present results in five discrete radial bins between $0<r/r_{50}<3.5$ with upper limits in $r/r_{50}$ of 0.5, 1., 1.75, 2.5, and 3.5; the median values of $r/r_{50}$ for data in these bins are 0.4, 0.8, 1.3, 2.1 and 2.85. The number of measurements peaks in the second and third bins. Numbers drop in the inner bin because we exclude measurements for $r<4"$ based on the recommendations from Law et al. (2021a) to avoid impact from beam-smearing. The median value of $r_{50}$ is 7.1 arcsec; at $0.6~{}r_{50}$ roughly half the sample has a radius $\sim$4 arcsec. In the outer two bins the survey design coverage limits the radial extent sampled. However, the distribution for apparent $r_{50}$ (in arcsec) has no trend in mass so the sampling in mass is uniform across radial bins.

The preponderance of measurements are at $r>h_{\rm rot}$, where the rotation curves are relatively flat. For our sample we find a median $h_{\rm rot}/r_{50}$ of 0.6. The distribution of this ratio as a function of stellar mass is shown in Figure 4; the median drops smoothly from 0.7 to 0.45 in mass bins from $6.8\times 10^{9}$ to $1.4\times 10^{11}$ $\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$   with a scatter (67% CL) of 0.18 in any mass interval. A similar trend with rotation speed has been observed by Andersen & Bershady (2013). The trend is in the anticipated sense that more massive galaxies have more concentrated mass profiles, as indicated by the increasing Sersic index with mass. This trend is, however, stronger for mass than for the Sersic index. Only the inner-most radial bin has some cases where $r\leq h_{\rm rot}$, but these are for lower-mass galaxies that have more slowly rising rotation curves so that in any event the radial velocity gradients within measurement annuli are small.

Dalcanton & Stilp (2010) have developed an elegant formalism for describing the anticipated lag between $V_{c}$ and $V_{\phi,g}$ due to pressure support in the gas otherwise moving in circular orbits in the galactic potential. Su et al. (2022) show that this formalism does an excellent job of correcting H$\alpha$ tangential speeds to match that of the cold gas in disks. Referring to equation 11 of Dalcanton & Stilp (2010), this lag depends on the radial gradients of the gas velocity dispersion and density. In the context of pressure support in a multi-phase medium, the relevant gas density is the total gas density, while the gas dispersion is the radial component for the observed tracer (in our case H$\alpha$ from the ionized gas component, whose dispersion we assume is isotropic).

When both the gas dispersion and density profiles can be described as radial exponential profiles with scale lengths of $h_{\sigma}$ and $h_{g}$, respectively, then

Since we do not have gas density profiles for individual galaxies (see Westfall et al., 2014), we leverage the results of Bigiel & Blitz (2012) who find that $h_{g}\sim 0.61~{}r_{\mu 25}$ in nearby spiral galaxies, with modest scatter ($r_{\mu 25}$ is defined as the radius of the 25 mag arcsec^-2 $B$-band isophote). For an exponential stellar disk obeying Freeman’s law (Freeman, 1970) with scale-length $h_{d}$ one finds $h_{g}\sim 1.88~{}h_{d}\sim 1.13~{}r_{50}$. (Using $r_{50}$ runs the risk of under-estimating $h_{g}$ for more bulge dominated systems where $r_{50}/h_{d}<1.67$, but the effect is minimal in practice.) In contrast, there is little evidence for significant radial gradients in the ionized gas velocity dispersion $\sigma_{g}$ outside of the inner regions where rotation curves steeply rise (Andersen et al., 2006; Martinsson et al., 2013). Beam-smearing may be a significant contributor to the measured increase sometimes seen in $\sigma_{g}$ at small radii (Law et al., 2021a), and our analysis here will work outside of this radial domain. It is therefore reasonable to assume that $h_{g}\ll h_{\sigma}$ so we adopt²²2Adopting $h_{\sigma}/h_{g}$ as large as 0.2 only changes the results of the correction by a few percent.

The amplitude of the correction to $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ can be estimated from equations 1 and  3. In our analysis, we use the emission line-ratios to estimate our gas line-widths since almost all of our lines are well below the instrumental resolution of the data. An added advantage of this method is the minimization of the bias inherent in measuring line-widths at low-to-moderate S/N (Law et al., 2021a). This estimation is based on the tight correlation found by Law et al. (2021b) between reliably-corrected MaNGA gas line-width measurements at high S/N ($>$50) and their line flux ratios of, e.g., [O III]/H$\beta$ versus [N II]/H$\alpha$. Specifically we use the average of the distance estimators d_N2 and d_S2 (defined in Law et al. (2021b), i.e., the distance in dex from the dynamically cold ridge-line in log([O III]/H$\beta$) versus log([N II]/H$\alpha$) or log([S II]/H$\alpha$, respectively), and interpolate based on the mode and width of the histograms in Figure 3 of Law et al. (2021b) for d_N2 to assign a characteristic value and uncertainty, respectively for the ionized gas line-width $\sigma_{g}$.

The result of this inversion of the Law et al. (2021b) correlation, applied to all of our measurements at all S/N, is shown in Figure 5, left-hand panels. Note that the preponderance of measurements are dynamically cold or HII-like (75% based on d_N2 and 90% based on d_S2, noting that the dynamically cold demarcation for [N II]/H$\alpha$ is essentially identical to Kauffmann et al. (2003)), and only 8% are dynamically hot. The derived $\sigma_{g}$ values are qualitatively reasonable; quantitatively they agree with the measured $\sigma_{g}$ to within 1% in the median, but with a 40% dispersion dominated by the kinematic measurements errors and corrections. The advantage of the line flux-ratio inferred values is that $\sigma_{g}$ remains well defined at small line-widths where, in the presence of measurement error, the correction for the instrumental resolution to the measured kinematics sometimes lead to undefined values (see Westfall et al., 2019; Law et al., 2021a; Chattopadhyay et al., 2024, in the specific context of MaNGA data).

The fractional value of this correction to $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ is shown in Figure 5 as a function of radius and mass. The median correction is $<$ 3%; corrections for 67/90% of the corrections are below 5/15%. We apply these corrections to derive $\sigma_{\rm AD,c}$. There are modest trends in the correction increasing with radius and decreasing with stellar mass, as expected from Equation 3, a relatively flat radial profile and mass-dependence for $\sigma_{g}$. We remove 124 measurements (4%) with corrections $>30$% from further analysis, but this does not preferentially bias against mass, radius, or ionization state. Four objects are removed from the sample, but these only had one or two initial measurements.

We adopt an empirical approach to estimate light-weighted mean ages for MaNGA spectra based on $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$: Age estimates remain as closely linked to the data as possible and they are easily reproducible. Model estimates are used to calibrate our relation between $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  and age.

Light- and mass-weighted mean ages have been estimated for MaNGA spectra by Sánchez et al. (2016a, b, 2018, Pipe3D), Goddard et al. (2017, Firefly); Parikh et al. (2018, Firefly) and Lu et al. (2023, pPXF) based on full-spectrum fitting to stellar populations synthesis (SPS) models. There are systematic differences in age estimates between models, the origin of which are not easily understood. Here we adopted the Pipe3D values for purposes of calibration, but again we emphasize that we do so in a way that is transparent and easily convertible to other calibrations.

These SPS estimates rely on spectra that are spatially averaged to reach minimum S/N requirements. Unfortunately the spatial apertures do not match the geometric regions we require to measure kinematics and hence these data products cannot be used directly in this analysis. This is secondary benefit of using $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  that can be readily measured in the specific geometric regions of galaxies where we probe kinematics.

Figure 6 shows the correlation of $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  with stellar population age. Data includes all spatial apertures defined by Pipe3D for all galaxies in our sample with age estimates. We exclude 14% of the apertures with the largest errors in $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  ($>0.004$), which appear to have uncertain age estimates based on their lack of correlation with $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$. Pipe3D does not measure $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  so we measured this quantity from the corresponding spectra, consistent with the definition from the DAP. These apertures cover a broad range in $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  and age that spans our full data. The spaxels also sample the full radial range of our data.

As shown in Appendix B, it is not possible to adopt a simple model (SSP or single star-formation history) to match the trends between age and $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$. This illustrates the well-known need for fitting SPS models to the data. We take advantage of this fitting, and convert $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  into an age using the third-order polynomial function shown in Figure 6 with x=$\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$: $\log({\rm age})=-5.295+21.9x-10.875x^{2}+1.8675x^{3}$. This function traces the measurements well with little ($<10$%) systematic trends as a function of $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$. The formal random errors in age based on errors in $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  alone are much smaller than the width of the distribution. The 67% CL in $\log({\rm age})$ is $\pm$0.13 dex (equivalent to a rms of 35% in age), fairly constant with $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$. The residuals illustrated in Figure 6 are computed in the orthogonal direction to the fit and are factor of 2.3 smaller than this. There are residuals with metallicity and extinction (Appendix B) qualitatively consistent with expectations: When Pipe3D estimates higher than average extinction or metallicity at a given $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  the corresponding Pipe3D age is lower. These residuals are consistent with the observed distribution about our polynomial fit. Future work might leverage the Balmer decrement and Lick indices to make suitable corrections if systematics in the model calibration warrant.

The result of applying the conversion from $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  to age is shown in Figure 7 at $0.8\ r_{50}$. We refer to the light-weighted mean age derived from $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  as $t_{\rm LW}$. Galaxies are color-coded by their total stellar mass. Not surprisingly, galaxies with larger mass index tend to have larger $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$  values consistent with older and more metal rich populations. These galaxies also have larger $\sigma_{\rm AD}$.

To relate our measure of AD to a stratification model requires associating $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ with components of the stellar velocity dispersion ellipsoid. Since the radial component of the stellar velocity ellipsoid, $\sigma_{r}$, is typically the largest, and like $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ probes in-plane motions, for simplicity we relate $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ to $\sigma_{r}$. Starting with Equation 13 in Appendix C we adopt reasonable values for the ellipsoid flattening and tilt, respectively, of $\sigma_{z}/\sigma_{r}=0.6$ (e.g., Pinna et al., 2018; Nitschai et al., 2021) and an intermediate value of $\lambda=0.5$, which ranges from 0 to 1, to evaluate $\lambda[(\sigma_{z}/\sigma_{r})^{2}-1]-1/2=-0.82$ and arrive at:

for a general Sersic profile of index $n_{S}$ where $b_{n}\sim 2n_{S}-1/3$ (see, e.g., Graham et al., 2005). The term $\lambda[(\sigma_{z}/\sigma_{r})^{2}-1]$ has a viable range between -1 and 0. The partial derivative for a $\tanh$ rotation-curve model, evaluated with equation 14, is a subdominant term for $r/r_{50}>0.25$ (Figure 17). Adopting the median values of $h_{\rm rot}/r_{50}$ = 0.6 (see Figure 5) and an exponential light profile ($n_{S}=1$), $\sigma_{\rm AD}/\sigma_{r}=1.6^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ at $r_{50}$, where the nominal values assumes $\sigma_{z}/\sigma_{r}=0.6$ and $\lambda=0.5$. The range of values encapsulates $0.3<\sigma_{z}/\sigma_{r}<1$ and $0<\lambda<1$. A similar computation for $1<n_{S}<5$ yields $\sigma_{\rm AD}/\sigma_{r}=1.8^{+0.4}_{-0.1}$ at $r_{50}$. The weak dependence of this $\sigma$-ratio on $n_{S}$ can be seen immediately by substituting in the approximation for $b_{n}$ into the second term of Equation 4. In the range $0.5<r/r_{50}<3$ for an exponential profile $\sigma_{\rm AD}/\sigma_{r}$ can be well approximated as a linear function of r given as $\sigma_{\rm AD}/\sigma_{r}=0.85+0.75(r/r_{50})$. This approximation is useful for relating $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ to components of the stellar velocity ellipsoid, but we use equation 4 for our analysis. We also apply the measured $h_{\rm rot}$ and $r_{50}$ values for our sample. In the context of the model there is at most 10% systematic uncertainty in this scaling for a plausible range of $\lambda$ and $\sigma_{z}/\sigma_{r}=0.6$ at a given radius.

The stratification of disk stars in phase-space may be either a relic of disk-settling, i.e., gas-cooling (Brook et al., 2004; Bournaud et al., 2009), or the result of a secular dynamical process of disk heating (Spitzer & Schwarzschild, 1951, 1953). Possibly it is a combination of both (Bird et al., 2013; Martig et al., 2012; Martig et al., 2014a, b). Here we wish merely to have a simple model that describes the present-day stratification that (a) reasonably describes what we see in the Milky Way’s solar neighborhood; (b) can be generalized to other radii and galaxies on basic astrophysical grounds; and (c) this generalization can be tied as directly as possible to observable quantities.

For this reason, we turn to the long-standing disk-heating model proposed by several authors (Wielen, 1977; Binney et al., 2000; Aumer & Binney, 2009; Aumer et al., 2016) who posed that for isotropic scattering, independent of stellar orbit, $d(V^{2})/dt=D~{}t$ where $D$ is the diffusion coefficient inversely proportional to V. From this one finds that

with $b=1/3$ and parameters for the solar cylinder of $\sigma_{0}=6$ $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$ and $\tau=0.05$ Gyr.

These values for $\sigma_{0}$ and $\tau$ are consistent with dispersions for the cool atomic and molecular gas layer and the dynamical time-scale of the disk at the solar circle, respectively. We use the latter fact to make a general model applicable at all radii by adopting

i.e., $t_{\rm dyn}(r)$ is 1/4 of the orbital period at radius $r$.³³3In general the epicyclic frequency $\kappa^{2}=2(V_{c}/r)(V_{c}/r+\partial V_{c}/\partial r)$ for nearly circular orbits in an axisymmetric potential (Binney & Tremaine, 2008). Hence in the radial range where the rotation curve is flat we can relate $t_{\rm dyn}(r)=(\pi/\sqrt{2})\ \kappa(r)^{-1}$.

In the case where the perturbers are highly concentrated to the disk mid-plane (e.g., giant molecular clouds), it might well be argued that the vertical oscillation period about the disk mid-plane, $T_{z}(r)$, would be better suited to equate with $\tau$ in Equations 5 and 6. For nearly circular orbits in an axisymmetric potential the vertical oscillation period, $\nu$, can be found from the second derivative of the potential with respect to height. This yields $T_{z}(r)=2\pi/\nu=\sqrt{2\pi/G\rho_{0}(r)}$, where $\rho_{0}(r)$ is the disk mid-plane density at radius $r$ (Binney & Tremaine, 2008).

As it so happens at the solar circle, $T_{z}(r)$ and $t_{\rm dyn}(r)$ are nearly the same even though their scalings with radius are different. If we assumes a constant mass scale-height with radius, and that dynamical mass surface-density scales with surface-brightness, then for the MW (using parameters adopted in Section 6.1.2) we find $t_{\rm dyn}/T_{z}=1\pm 0.1$, i.e., unity to within 10%, in the range $0.7<r/r_{50}<2.7$. This range contains 83% of our measurements. In our smallest and largest radial bins the difference between the two time-scales is $<35$%. The uncertainties in estimating mass scale-heights and mass surface-densities (particularly when atomic and molecular gas mass surface-densities are not available) to determine $\rho_{0}$ and hence $T_{z}$ are likely larger than the differences between $t_{\rm dyn}(r)$ and the actual $T_{z}(r)$ values at any given radius of interest. In contrast, the circular speed is reliably measured in our data. For these reasons we opt to retain $t_{\rm dyn}(r)$ rather than $T_{z}$ for our reference time-scale $\tau(r)$.

Wielen (1977) pointed out that another reasonable assumption is for the diffusion coefficient $D$ to be constant, yielding a power-law index $b=0.5$ rather 0.33. Numerous theoretical predictions and observational analyses of stellar ages and kinematics in the MW solar neighborhood yield $0.2<b<0.6$; these are discussed in our introduction with the theoretical and observational literature also well summarized by Kumamoto et al. (2017) and Hänninen & Flynn (2002), respectively. It is also clear from these studies that the values of $b$ and $\sigma_{0}$ depend on the component of the velocity ellipsoid: For the MW solar neighborhood the vertical index ($b_{z}$) tends to be larger than the radial $b_{r}$, but with lower initial amplitude ($\sigma_{z,0}<\sigma_{r,0}$; Hänninen & Flynn, 2002; Holmberg et al., 2009; Aumer & Binney, 2009; Sharma et al., 2014; Aumer et al., 2016).

Consequently for our analysis we specifically use our conversion $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ to $\sigma_{r}$, and in fitting trends of $\sigma_{r}$ with age and radius, we allow both the amplitude ($\sigma_{r,0}$) and index ($b_{r}$) to be model parameters:

where $t_{\rm dyn}$ is defined by Equation 6. We make no assumptions about $b_{r}$, $\sigma_{r,0}$, their variation between galaxies, or their trends with radius. We stress that this stratification model says nothing about time’s arrow and simply is a convenient way to predict the relation between stellar population age and kinematics (i.e., their AVR) in today’s galaxies if their stratification process is similar to that of the MW. In a large sample of galaxies, we might expect the AVR in some cases is dominated by one or more impulsive events ex situ to the disk, e.g., mergers; in these cases our stratification model may be inadequate to describe well the data. This is something we can test. We also adopt the light-weighted mean age ($t_{\mathrm{LW}}$) for $t$, which carries an implicit assumption that the light-weighted age as determined from SPS (continuum shape and absorption-line equivalent widths) corresponds to the characteristic asymmetric drift signal measured from the stellar kinematics. We address low-level systematics inherent in this assumption below.

While we measure light-weighted ages and kinematics from full-spectrum fitting over the same range in wavelength, the effective light-weighting for stellar age and stellar kinematics (here, velocities) are not necessarily identical. This might come about, for example, because the relevant line-strengths that contain the kinematic signal do not scale with age in the same way as the continuum level. Further, the stellar population ages are, by definition, referenced specifically to some wavelength or wavelength range (we chose the $V$-band to be near the mid-point in the spectral range), and, unlike the kinematics, do not depend in detail on the wavelength distribution of relative line-strengths. These differences may lead to subtle systematic mismatches between characteristic velocities and ages. We addressed this by creating mock spectra with star-formation histories and rates of dynamical stratification that appear to span what is observed in our data, as described in Appendix D.

We find that in the presence of dynamical stratification there are systematic differences between recovered velocities and velocities expected from $\sigma_{r}(t)$ given the recovered light-weighted age: pPXF tends to overestimate ages and velocities (and hence underestimate $\sigma_{\rm AD}$). The amplitude of the systematics depends primarily on $V_{c}$ and $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$, peaking at the lower values of $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$ $\sim 1.3$ for the fastest rotation speeds. While the correction can be as much as 30%, the mean correction is 11% at $r_{50}$, increasing on average with radius from 8% to 14% between $0.25<r/r_{50}<3$. The typical uncertainty in this correction increases from 2% to 4% over the same radial range, as illustrated in the right-hand map of Figure 18. In summary, the corrections are quite modest and well determined. They are applied to the data, based on the $V_{c}$ and $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$values of each radial bin in each galaxy, in all subsequent analysis.

Figure 7 shows the trends of $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ at 0.8 $r_{50}$ with $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$, light-weighted mean age, local dynamical time, and the ratio of light-weighted mean age to the local dynamical time. Notable are the opposite trends of the two time-scales with $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ and stellar mass. On the one hand stellar age correlates with total mass, while at a given radial scale the increase in the rotation speed in more massive galaxies decreases the dynamical time. These two factors are both at play in the correlation of $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ with $\log(1+t_{\rm LW}/t_{\rm dyn})$ that we use to constrain the stratification model. We measure $\tau_{\rm dyn}$ directly from the data, finding values of $41\pm 14$ Myr at $r/r_{50}=0.8$, with the range enclosing 67% of the sample in the radial bin.

The immediate impression from Figure 8 is that there is a significant trend with radius of increasing overall amplitude of $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ at a given $\log(1+t_{\rm LW}/t_{\rm dyn})$, as well as a flattening of the correlation between these two quantities. The derived model parameters $\sigma_{r,0}$ and $b_{r}$ are plotted in Figure 9 (left-hand panel) as a function of radius adopting an exponential light profile for the disk (equation 4).⁵⁵5The results adopting the generalized Sersic profile and Sersic indices for each galaxy yielded nearly identical results, so we do not report them here. We clip the data at 2.5$\sigma$ about the best fit; reducing the clipping does not change the qualitative trend, but the results are considerably noisier. Confidence intervals (ensemble method) and weighted errors (indy method) are computed on the clipped sample. The stratification amplitude $\sigma_{r,0}$ rises with with radius, between 15 and 40 $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$. The stratification index $b_{r}$ also declines with radius in the range $0.4<b_{r}<0.2$. The results for fixed $b_{r}=0.33$ and 0.5 serve to depress best-fitting values for $\sigma_{r,0}$ and also keep these values nearly constant with radius; this simply illustrates well the covariance between the two stratification parameters.

Another immediate impression from Figure 8 is that at any given radius there is a gradient in total galaxy mass along the trend-line between the $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ and $\log(1+t_{\rm LW}/t_{\rm dyn})$. This differentiation weakens at larger radius where the slope also appears to lessen. It is reasonable to wonder if, or to what extent a mass-dependence in both quantities drives the correlation between these two parameters. That is to say, it is conceivable that there exist primary causal links between mass and both mean stellar population age (as a reflection of trends in star-formation history with halo mass) and stellar velocity dispersion (a proxy for mass in dispersion-dominated systems), the result of which is an apparent correlation between $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ and $\log(1+t_{\rm LW}/t_{\rm dyn})$ that is not driven by a stratification process. Even in systems that are not dispersion-dominated (such as galaxy disks), it is reasonable to expect that more massive galaxies will tend to have more massive disks with larger velocity dispersions, and hence larger $\sigma_{\rm AD}$.

Alternatively, we suggest this mass-gradient manifests in the data as a reflection of a general age-velocity relationship in stellar populations where (i) more massive galaxies tend to have more evolved (older and more metal rich) stellar populations (i.e., the trends in the CMD); and (ii) within galaxies the inner regions tend to have older stellar populations (so-called inside out growth). Equivalently: late-type galaxies tend to be less massive and have smaller bulges (and more modest population gradients), while early-type galaxies tend to be more massive and have larger bulges (and more pronounced populations gradients transitioning from bulge to disk). These trends reflect the distribution of, e.g., $\mathrm{D_{n}(4000)}$, within any given galaxy. The correlation between $\sigma_{\rm AD}$ and $\log(1+t_{\rm LW}/t_{\rm dyn})$, in this picture, represents a general age-velocity relationship in stellar populations with all disk galaxies. The fact that there is general agreement between the stratification parameters in the ensemble and indy methods (Figure 9) supports this picture.

To further demonstrate that this correlation is not driven entirely by the correlation of mean stellar population age with galaxy stellar mass, we can also divide our sample by mass into three equal bins by number of galaxies (and roughly equal number of individual measurements) and repeat the fitting exercise. The mass boundaries are $\log{\rm M}_{\star}/{\rm M}_{\odot}=10.4$ and 10.8. The median mass in each bin is 10.2, 10.6 and 11.0 in the log, with bins widths of 0.9, 0.4, and 0.5 dex⁶⁶6In the lower- and upper-mass bin width we discount the full bin-width required to include one galaxy in each bin at the extra of the mass distribution that do not have indy-method fits.. The results, as a function of both mass and radius, are illustrated in Figure 10 for both ensemble and indy methods. Again, there are clearly non-zero values for $b_{r}$ in all mass bins and at most radii, further supporting a stratification model driving a general age-velocity relationship in stellar populations. It is also interesting to note that the stratification parameters at $r=r_{50}$ are very similar in all mass intervals, despite the different radial trends. This may suggest a self-similar stratification mechanism at this radius across galaxy masses.

Overall the stratification index ($b_{r}$) appears to be lower for the ensemble method than the indy method. Our preference here is for the indy method values: Because the effective radial range of the indy measurements is modest, systematics are also likely modest. The ensemble method, as already noted, may tend to bias toward lower $b_{r}$ and higher $\sigma_{r,0}$ if the population exhibits a significant range of stratification. We find no appreciable change in minimum reduced $\chi^{2}$ ($\chi_{\nu}^{2}$) or sample rejection fraction (with iterative clipping) in the ensemble method when dividing the sample by mass. This suggests additional astrophysical scatter or the limited efficacy of the simple model to explain age-velocity relations in the galaxy population.

We explored if the dependence on stratification parameters was better defined by the Sersic index (as a measure of stellar mass concentration). Figure 11 also serves to show that trends in the stratification parameters with mass are mimicked by trends of the Sersic index with mass. Given the range of the stratification parameters at a given mass and the strong correlation of Sersic index with mass, we have been unable to find any additional significant dependence on the Sersic index.

As one might anticipate from Equation 7, and as noted above (Figures 9) through  11, there is a strong covariance between $\sigma_{r,0}$ and $b_{r}$. This is best seen in the stratification parameter values determined for individual galaxies, as shown in Figure 12. The slope of the correlation between $\log\sigma_{r,0}$ and $b_{r}$ is well described by the characteristic value of $-\log(1+t/t_{\rm dyn})=-1.5$, as seen from inspection of Figure 8, and as it should be; the correlation is slightly steeper(shallower) for the higher(lower) mass galaxies, also consistent with the trends in the $\log(1+t/t_{\rm dyn})$ distributions as a function of mass as seen in this figure.