1]\orgdivDepartment of Astrophysics/IMAPP, \orgnameRadboud University Nijmegen, \orgaddress\streetP.O. Box 9010, \cityNijmegen, \postcode6500 GL, \countryThe Netherlands
2]\orgdivDepartment of Physics, \orgnameUniversity of Warwick, \orgaddress\streetCoventry, CV4 7AL, \countryUK
3]\orgdivGEPI, \orgnameObservatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, \orgaddress\street5 Place Jules Janssen, \cityMeudon, \postcode92190, \countryFrance
4]\orgdivCosmic Dawn Center (DAWN), \orgaddress\countryDenmark 5]\orgdivNiels Bohr Institute, \orgnameUniversity of Copenhagen, \orgaddress\streetJagtvej 128, \cityCopenhagen, \postcode2200, \countryDenmark 6]\orgdivSchool of Physics and Astronomy, \orgnameUniversity of Leicester, \orgaddress\streetUniversity Road, \cityLeicester, \postcodeLE1 7RH, \countryUnited Kingdom
7]\orgdivOsservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, \orgnameINAF, \orgaddress\streetSalita Moiariello 16, \cityNapoli, \postcode80131, \countryItaly
8]\orgdivDepartment of Astronomy, \orgnameUniversity of Geneva, \orgaddress\streetChemin Pegasi 51, \cityVersoix, \postcode1290, \countrySwitzerland
9]\orgdivInstituto de AstrofĂsica de Canarias, \orgnameIAC, \orgaddress\streetE-38205, \cityLa Laguna, S/C de Tenerife, \countrySpain 10]\orgdivDepartamento de AstrofĂsica, Univ. de La Laguna, \orgaddress\streetE-38206, \cityLa Laguna, Tenerife, \countrySpain
11]\orgdivCenter for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics, \orgnameNorthwestern University, \orgaddress\street1800 Sherman Ave, 8th Floor, \cityEvanston, \postcode60201, \stateIL, \countryUSA
12]\orgdivOsservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio, \orgnameINAF, \orgaddress\streetVia Piero Gobetti 93/3, \cityBologna, \postcode40129, \countryItaly
13]\orgdivOsservatorio astronomico di Brera, \orgnameINAF, \orgaddress\streetVia E. Bianchi 46, \cityMerate, \postcode23807, \countryItaly
14]\orgdivSchool of Physics and Astronomy, \orgnameUniversity of Birmingham, \orgaddress \cityBirmingham, \postcodeB15 2TT, \countryUK 15]\orgdivInstitute for Gravitational Wave Astronomy, \orgnameUniversity of Birmingham, \orgaddress\cityBirmingham, \postcodeB15 2TT, \countryUK
16]\orgdivSchool of Physics and Centre for Space Research, \orgnameUniversity College Dublin, \orgaddress\streetBelfield, \cityDublin 4, \countryIreland
17]\orgdivUniversitĂ© de la CĂŽte dâAzur, Observatoire de la CĂŽte dâAzur, CNRS, Artemis, \orgaddress \cityNice, \postcodeF-06304, \countryFrance 18]\orgdivAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LAM, \orgaddress\cityMarseille, \countryFrance
19]\orgdivKavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, \orgnameMassachusetts Institute of Technology, \orgaddress\street77 Massachusetts Avenue, \cityCambridge, \postcode02139, \stateMA, \countryUSA
20]\orgdivNational Astronomical Observatories, \orgnameChinese Academy of Sciences, \orgaddress\cityBeijing, \postcode100103, \countryChina
21]\orgdivUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, \orgnameChinese Academy of Sciences, \orgaddress\cityBeijing, \postcode100049, \countryChina
22]\orgdivKey Laboratory of Space Astronomy and Technology, National Astronomical Observatories, \orgnameChinese Academy of Sciences, \orgaddress\street20A Datun Road, \cityBeijing, \postcode100101, \countryChina
23] \orgnameCentro AstronĂłmico Hispano en AndalucĂa, \orgaddress\streetObservatorio de Calar Alto, Sierra de los Filabres, \cityGĂ©rgal, AlmerĂa, \postcode04550, \countrySpain
24]\orgdivInstituto de AstrofĂsica, Facultad de FĂsica and Centro de AstroingenierĂa, Facultad de FĂsica, Pontificia Universidad CatĂłlica de Chile, \orgnameUC, \orgaddress\streetCampus San JoaquĂn, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, \citySantiago, \postcode7820436, \stateRM, \countryChile 25]\orgdivMillennium Institute of Astrophysic, \orgnameMAS, \orgaddress\streetNuncio Monseñor SĂłtero Sanz 100, Of 104, Providencia, \citySantiago, \postcode7500011, \stateRM, \countryChile 26]\orgdivSpace Science Institute, \orgnameSSI, \orgaddress\street4750 Walnut Street, Suite 205, \cityBoulder, \postcode80301, \stateCO, \countryUSA
27]\orgdivAstrophysics, Department of Physics, \orgnameUniversity of Oxford, \orgaddress\streetKeble Road, \cityOxford, \postcodeOX1 3RH, \countryUnited Kingdom
28]\orgdivEuropean Space Agency (ESA), \orgnameEuropean Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC), \orgaddress\streetKeplerlaan 1, \cityNoordwijk, \postcode2201Â AZ, \countryThe Netherlands
29]\orgdivSpace Science Data Centre, \orgnameItalian Space Agency, \orgaddress\streetvia del Politecnico snc, \cityRome, \postcode00133, \countryItaly 30]\orgdivINAF, \orgnameOsservatorio Astronomico di Roma, \orgaddress\streetvia di Frascati 33, \cityMonteporzio Catone (RM), \postcode00078, \countryItaly
31]\orgdivMIFT Department, \orgnameUniversity of Messina, \orgaddress\streetVia F. S. DâAlcontres 31, \cityMessina, \postcode98166, \countryItaly
32]\orgdivDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, \orgnameUniversity of Sheffield, \orgaddress \citySheffield, \postcodeS3 7RH, \countryUnited Kingdom
33]\orgdivInstitute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC), \orgaddress\streetCampus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, \cityBarcelona, \postcodeE-08193, \countrySpain 34]\orgdivInstitut dâEstudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), \orgaddress\cityCastelldefels, \postcodeE-08860, \countrySpain
35]\orgdivIstituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, \orgnameINAF, \orgaddress\streetvia Fosso del Cavaliere 100, \cityRome, \postcodeI-00133, \countryItaly
36]\orgdivCenter for Astrophysics and Cosmology, \orgnameUniversity of Nova Gorica, \orgaddress\streetVipavska cesta 11 c, \cityAjdovĆĄÄina, \postcodeSI-5270, \countrySlovenia
37]\orgdivCentre for Astrophysics and Cosmology, \orgnameUniversity of Iceland, \orgaddress\streetDunhagi, \cityReykjavĂk, \postcode107, \countryIceland
38]\orgdivLund Observatory, \orgnameLund University, \orgaddress\streetBox 118, \cityLund, \postcode22100, \countrySweden
39]\orgdivAstrophysics Office/ZP12, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, \orgnameMSFC, \orgaddress\cityHuntsville, \postcode35812, \stateAlabama, \countryU.S.A.
40]\orgdivDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, \orgnameUniversity of Utah, \orgaddress\citySalt Lake City, \postcode84112, \stateUtah, \countryUSA
41]\orgdivYunnan Observatories, \orgnameChinese Academy of Sciences, \orgaddress\cityMerate, \postcode23807, \stateYunnan Province, \countryChina
42]\orgdivDepartment of Astronomy and Joint Space-Science Institute, \orgnameUniversity of Maryland, \orgaddress\cityCollege Park, \postcode20742, \stateMaryland, \countryUSA
43]\orgdivSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, \orgnameMacquarie University, \orgaddress\streetStreet, \citySydney, \postcode2109, \stateNSW, \countryAustralia 44]\orgdivARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions, \orgnameASTRO3D, \orgaddress\streetStreet, \countryAustralia
45]\orgdivDepartment of Physics, \orgnameLancaster University, \orgaddress\streetBailrigg, \cityLancaster, \postcodeLA1 4YW, \stateLancashire, \countryUK
46]\orgdivAnton Pannekoek Institute of Astronomy, \orgnameUniversity of Amsterdam, \orgaddress\streetScience Park 904, \cityAmsterdam, \postcode1098 XH, \countryThe Netherlands
47]\orgdivIstituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica cosmica, \orgnameINAF, \orgaddress\streetVia Corti 12, \cityMilano, \postcode20133, \countryItaly
48]\orgdivInstituto de AstrofĂsica de AndalucĂa, \orgnameCSIC, \orgaddress\streetGlorieta de la AstronomĂa, s/n, \cityGranada, \postcodeE-18080, \countrySpain
49]\orgdivThe Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, \orgnameStockholm University, \orgaddress\streetAlbaNova, \cityStockholm, \postcodeSE-106 91, \stateStockholm, \countrySweden 50]\orgdivNordita, \orgnameStockholm University and KTH Royal Institute of Technology, \orgaddress\streetHannes Alfvéns vÀg 12, \cityStockholm, \postcodeSE-106 91, \stateStockholm, \countrySweden
51]\orgdivASU-CAS, \orgnameAstronomical Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, \orgaddress\streetFriÄova 298, \cityOndĆejov, \countryCzech Republic
52]\orgdivCentre for Astrophysics Research, \orgnameUniversity of Hertfordshire, \orgaddress\streetCollege Lane, \cityHatfield, \postcodeAL10 9AB, \countryUnited Kingdom
The fast X-ray transient EPâ240315a: a gamma-ray burst in a Lyman continuum leaking galaxy
Abstract
The nature of the minute-to-hour long Fast X-ray Transients (FXTs) localised by telescopes such as Chandra, Swift, and XMM-Newton remains mysterious, with numerous models suggested for the events. Here, we report multi-wavelength observations of EP240315a, a 1600âs long transient detected by the Einstein Probe, showing it to have a redshift of . We measure a low column density of neutral hydrogen, indicating that the event is embedded in a low-density environment, further supported by direct detection of leaking ionising Lyman-continuum. The observed properties are consistent with EPâ240315a being a long-duration -ray burst, and these observations support an interpretation in which a significant fraction of the FXT population are lower-luminosity examples of similar events. Such transients are detectable at high redshifts by the Einstein Probe and, in the (near) future, out to even larger distances by SVOM, THESEUS, and Athena, providing samples of events into the epoch of reionisation.
keywords:
High energy astrophysics:X-ray transient sources, High energy astrophysics:Gamma-ray transient sources1 Introduction
Studying the nature of short-timescale astrophysical transient events is a major endeavour across the electromagnetic spectrum, from millisecond activity in fast radio bursts (FRBs [1]) to the multiple sources that evolve on timescales of hours to days in the optical sky [2, 3], to the high-energy gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) that have been studied for more than half a century. Perhaps surprisingly, the origin of similar singular outbursts that have been detected using instruments sensitive to soft X-ray photons (.3â10 keV) remains uncertain. These fast X-ray transients (FXTs) have been known for almost as long as GRBs [e.g. 4, 5], however, it is only more recently that better and occasionally rapid localizations have allowed some of them to be pinpointed as securely extragalactic events [6, 7].
Intensive archival searches have now found FXTs in Chandra [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12] and XMM-Newton [13, 14] observations. These transients are characterized by durations of hundreds to thousands of seconds [11, 12, 13] and power-law spectra. There have been many suggestions for their origin, which include powering by rapid spin-down of a millisecond magnetar formed in a binary neutron star merger [15]; by the tidal disruption (TDE) of a white dwarf by an intermediate-mass black hole [7, 16]; by a supernova shock breakout [17]; or by cocoon-like emission from a jet breakout in long-GRBs [18].
The relationship of these FXTs to previously identified populations of high-energy transients remains, however, unclear. In particular, while GRBs were identified based on their spectral peak in the 100 keV â 1 MeV range (where is the energy flux density and the photon energy), missions with softer responses, such as BeppoSAX and HETE-2, also uncovered GRB-like events with much lower peak energies, often dubbed X-ray flashes (XRFs; [e.g. 19]). These have durations more like those of classical GRBs, but spectra that peak at tens of keV, or sometimes even keV. In at least two cases, the very long (2000âs) GRB/XRFâ060218 [20] and GRB/XRFâ020903 [21] the detection of supernova signatures points to similar progenitors for XRFs as for long-duration GRBs, although other events have strong limits on supernova emission [22, 23]. However, the relation of these XRFs to the longer-lived FXTs is less certain. In this regard, it is worth noting that the list of models for GRB creation postulated before the identification of the first afterglows was very long (118 distinct models according to the list of [24]), so there is no shortage of potential routes to the creation of high-energy emission. The question of whether these scenarios manifest in nature, and at what rate, remains open.
The recent launch of the Einstein Probe (EP; [25, 26]) offers the opportunity to make decisive inroads into these questions. In particular, its Wide-field X-ray Telescope (WXT) has a soft X-ray response (0.5â4 keV), a wide field of view (3600 deg2) and unprecedented sensitivity thanks to the use of focussing Lobster-eye optics. It should enable the discovery of substantial populations of high-energy transients. The expectation is that the soft response and detection via imaging, rather than scintillators or coded-mask detectors should enhance the detectability of GRBs (and related phenomena) at high redshift where both time dilation and the redshift of the spectrum could favor X-ray detection methods. Discovery of distant transients would be of significant importance because of their value as probes of the high-redshift Universe [27]. In this regard, GRBs and related transients have several advantages over other probes, even galaxies now identified at extreme redshifts by JWST. GRBs signal the collapse of individual massive stars at very high redshift, potentially even providing a route for the identification of first-generation stars. Moreover, because these GRBs select galaxies based on a single star rather than the integrated light, they can sample galaxies across the luminosity function, including those undetectable to current technology [28]. Finally, the afterglows themselves are bright backlights on which we view the imprint of the interstellar and intergalactic medium. This enables, for example, the reconstruction of detailed abundance patterns in high redshift galaxies [29], direct measurements of the neutral fraction of the intergalactic medium during the epoch of reionisation [30], and a powerful route to determine the fraction of photons that can escape from these regions of massive stars to drive this reionisation [31, 32].
2 Results
EPâ240315a was discovered by the EP WXT as a soft X-ray transient with 1600Â s duration [33]. Although no associated GRB was promptly reported, analysis of data from both Swift-BAT and Konus-Wind showed a 50 s long GRB with a consistent sky position which occurred seconds after the onset of emission detected by EP [34, 35]. In general, GRBs show an evolution from hard to soft, and so both the difference in X-ray and -duration and time of onset would appear, at first sight, unusual. However, it should be noted that GRB follow-up is normally initiated by the -ray trigger with X-ray observations occurring later. X-rays before the main -ray pulse have not been well studied, although at least a few examples (GRBâ011121, GRBâ981226, GRBâ980519) exist in the sample of GRBs observed by BeppoSAX [36, 37, 38]. Overall, the duration observed in -rays would mark EPâ240315a as a normal long-GRB while the 1600âs emission in the X-ray regime would imply an ultra-long GRB [39]. The field covering EPâ240315a was imaged by the ATLAS survey approximately one hour after the outburst, and a bright new optical source, ATâ2024eju, was uncovered in these observations [40, 41].
We obtained spectroscopic observations with the GTC/OSIRIS+ and VLT/X-shooter instruments beginning 27 and 29 hours after the burst [42, 43], respectively (1 and 3 hours after the report of the counterpart). These spectra show a strong break at âĂ which can be interpreted as due to Ly- absorption. The X-shooter observations reveal numerous high ionisation lines from metals including carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and silicon, and from these, we infer a systemic redshift of (see Figure 1 and Methods). Our spectroscopy provides good signal-to-noise from 7100 to 15,000âĂ (1216â2600 Ă in the rest frame). Over this range, the optical counterpart light is reasonably described by a spectral slope of , typical of GRB afterglows. A second X-shooter spectrum was obtained on 31 March 2024. At this epoch, the afterglow had faded substantially, but we recovered a Ly- line from the host galaxy in emission.
In addition to these spectroscopic observations, we also obtained optical and IR photometric observations with the VLT, GTC, NOT, TNG and LBT, and X-ray observations with the Chandra X-ray Observatory (see Figure 3 and Methods). Combining these with data from the literature (see Methods) the optical/IR counterpart decays in the -band as from the time of our first to last observations. The X-ray observations favour a steeper slope, with the two Chandra epochs suggesting a decay faster than (at 95% confidence). The late-time X-ray slope would appear to be indicative of a GRB afterglow post-jet break as favoured by detailed afterglow modelling (see [44]). The difference in X-ray and optical slopes may indicate a contribution from an underlying host galaxy in our latest -band data-point, although the late-time detections are only marginal.
The combined spectral and temporal behaviour of the counterpart is consistent with that seen for the afterglows of GRBs. In Figure 3 we compare the behaviour of EPâ240315a with the X-ray and optical/IR lightcurves of a sample of both high redshift GRBs detected with Swift and with the population of ultra-long GRBs [39]. The properties of EPâ240315a are consistent with these comparison events, although it is notable that while the optical afterglow of EPâ240315a is relatively bright compared with this sample, it is comparatively fainter in the X-rays. Still, many GRBs (often not those at the highest redshift) do lie in this region of parameter space. Furthermore, the -ray energetics and the location of EPâ240315a on the relations between prompt spectral properties and energetics are also entirely consistent with those seen in GRBs [34].
A striking feature of the spectroscopy is the very sharp break at Ly- (Figure 1). This is a combination of light from Ly- in emission and a very low neutral hydrogen gas column density along the line of sight. The lines of sight to many long-GRBs have extremely high column densities of neutral hydrogen gas, exhibiting so-called damped Lyman- systems with [45]. In fact, the median long-GRB has [31]. In contrast, the afterglow of EPâ240315a requires a low for , although a higher column density is allowed if the absorberâs redshift is a free parameter (see Methods). Importantly, this low column implies a non-negligible escape fraction of ionising photons. Lyman continuum leakage is not unprecedented in long GRB lines of sight, but very rare [32]. At such ionizing photons are required to drive the transition of the intergalactic medium from its neutral to ionised state. However, most studies to date suggest rather low escape fractions from regions of star formation at this cosmic epoch, proving something of a challenge in obtaining the required photon budget. For EPâ240315a the inferred escape fraction may be close to unity (for ). Indeed, because of the relatively bright backlight provided by the counterpart, we can test for this by examining the spectrum at rest-frame wavelengths âĂ (i.e. the Lyman limit). We detect escaping ionizing photons in the regime 900â912âĂ with a significance of (see Figure 2 and Methods). This is the highest redshift at which such ionising photons have been directly detected, although the interference of the dense Ly- forest precludes the robust calculation of the escape fraction from the leaking photons.
3 Discussion
EPâ240315a appears very similar to the classical cosmological GRBs at comparable redshift. Although it is striking that the EP trigger begins several minutes before the -ray detections, in the absence of this trigger, the burst would have a typical GRB duration, and similar energetics and would lie on the spectral correlations that hold for long GRBs. A natural conclusion is that this FXT (and by extension a significant fraction of other FXTs) are related to GRBs. Alternatively, if this is not true, and many FXTs are related to other astrophysical phenomena, we should consider if our populations of GRBs are substantially contaminated by different progenitor populations, and if missions such as EP could uncover new classes of high-energy explosions.
Firstly, we should consider the progenitor of EPâ240315a itself. Although its -ray duration is typical of GRBs, it lasts much longer at softer X-ray energies: 1600 s in the 0.5â4 keV band of the EP WXT. However, it does not have the very long duration at high luminosity erg s-1) seen for the candidate relativistic tidal disruption events [46, 47]. In particular, by the time of the first epoch of Chandra observations at 3 days (0.5 days in the rest frame) the luminosity is erg s-1, two orders of magnitude fainter than Swift J1644+57 at this time. The 1600 s duration would (depending on the classification scheme) place it within the ultra-long GRB population [39] which do appear to be related to stellar collapse in some cases [48]. However, the -ray duration is much shorter.
If we identify EPâ240315a as a typical, long-duration GRB then the progenitor would be expected to be a massive star. The presence of Ly- in emission in the host galaxy suggests that such a young population of stars is present. However, there is good recent evidence which suggests that long-GRBs arise not only from collapsars but also from the merger of compact objects. This is based, in particular on the detection of kilonova signatures in the long duration GRBâ211211A [49, 50] and GRBâ230307A [51, 52]. The appeal of such a progenitor in the case of EPâ240315a would lie in explaining the very low hydrogen column density. In particular, if a progenitor is kicked from its birth site then it may ultimately merge away from the dense dust and gas around the massive stars, presenting a lower hydrogen column density and a higher escape fraction. Thus, the detection of Lyman leakage would be more readily explained at with a merger than with a massive star. Similar constraints may also favour the tidal disruptions of white dwarfs by intermediate-mass black holes, which could take place in (proto)-globular clusters and be relatively gas-free. However, the expected rates of such disruptions are typically even lower than the rates of compact object mergers [53, 54]. While these arguments could favour an alternative (non-massive star) progenitor it is important to remember that to reionise the Universe there should be sufficient lines of sight to massive stars with low escape fractions to allow their ionising photons to reach the intergalactic medium. We could, therefore, be observing such a fortuitous line of sight. In principle, the detection of supernova emission could confirm the progenitor, although this would require JWST observations. In the absence of a supernova, the location relative to the host galaxy could be diagnostic. At present our limits on host galaxy emission are weak, at 16 days post-burst, VLT observations provide a magnitude (AB) for the combination of afterglow and host, implying . The source location is astrometrically consistent with the afterglow position. However, host detection and offset measurements are within the realm of future observations. At the current time, aside from noting its observational similarity with long-GRBs, we cannot, with the data available, make strong statements about the progenitor of EPâ204315a. However, we also note that using GRBs as probes of the escape fraction at high redshift will ultimately rely on making robust inferences of progenitors, at least on a statistical level.
Given our conclusion that EPâ240315a is a normal GRB, it is therefore relevant to consider if many of the observed FXTs could be related to the GRB phenomena. At first sight, there appears to be little in common between the bright GRBs at and the much fainter FXTs. The GRBs have durations of seconds to minutes, are detected predominantly at energies â100 keV and have peak luminosities of erg s-1. The FXTs have durations of minutes to hours, are not detected outside of the soft X-ray regime (probably due to a large delay between the FXT onset and their discoveries) and in the cases where likely redshifts have been measured have luminosities of erg s-1. However, there are good reasons to believe these populations could be related. A more thorough discussion is provided in the Methods, however, in summary: Current detectors are biased towards GRBs with high peak fluxes, while longer-lived bursts with a lower peak flux, but the same total fluence, are more difficult to detect. Indeed, the luminosity function of GRBs rises steeply to fainter sources [55] so in the narrow, pencil beam surveys undertaken by Chandra and XMM-Newton we would expect to locate the fainter examples at high redshift where the cosmological volume is maximized. We expect these low luminosity examples to be spectrally soft. While it is not certain that the two populations are related, the presence of a substantial population of on-axis, GRB-like events within the FXT population is entirely plausible (see Figure 6).
Regardless of its progenitor, EPâ240315a points to a new route to identify high-energy transients in the distant Universe. The use of wide-field soft X-ray detectors has long been suggested as a route to enhancing the detectability of high- GRBs thanks to cosmological redshifting that moves the peak energy of the bursts closer to the X-ray range. EPâ240315a appears to confirm this promise. Although it is only a single event, as the first object with a redshift from EP it has a markedly higher redshift than the median redshifts of Swift GRBs (; [56]). EP and similar technologies such as those used in the ESA M7 candidate THESEUS [57] should reveal tens of GRBs beyond . If the progenitors of these systems are clear, and in particular if they are massive stars then they offer powerful new routes to probing both the production (e.g. via host galaxies) and absorption of ionizing radiation well into the epoch of reionization.
Interestingly, narrower field-of-view instruments can also play an important role. Chandra has a three-order of magnitude greater sensitivity than the EP WXT, and Athena would be a further factor of more sensitive. This substantially offsets the factor of between the field of view of the EP WXT and the Athena Wide Field Imager. The Athena WFI can perform a volume-limited survey for sources with erg s-1 out to should a burst occur at such a redshift, and scaling from the Chandra population allowing for the factor in field of view and factor 30 in sensitivity should give a rate of detection of FXTs for Athena that is two orders of magnitude larger than for Chandra (although it should be noted that the Chandra population has been accrued over 20+ years). Critically, it will also provide precise positions for follow-up with extremely large telescopes. A time domain survey with Athena could be a powerful complementary route to discovering the collapse of stars very early in the Universe.
Acknowledgements
Based on observations collected at the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere under ESO programme 110.24CF (PI Tanvir, Vergani, Malesani); and with the GTC, under the International Time Programme of the CCI (International Scientific Committee of the Observatorios de Canarias of the IAC), operated on the island of La Palma by the Roque de los Muchachos (program GTC1-23ITP; PIs Jonker, Torres); and with the Italian TNG operated on the island of La Palma by the FundaciĂłn Galileo Galilei of the INAF (Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica) at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias (program A47TAC_42, PI Melandri); and with the LBT (program IT-2023B-020, PI Maiorano); and with the Nordic Optical Telescope, owned in collaboration by the University of Turku and Aarhus University, and operated jointly by Aarhus University, the University of Turku and the University of Oslo, representing Denmark, Finland and Norway, the University of Iceland and Stockholm University at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos, La Palma, Spain, of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. The scientific results reported in this article are based in part on observations made by the Chandra X-ray Observatory under program number 25208972 (PI: Levan). We thank the staff of the VLT, GTC, NOT, TNG, LBT and Chandra for their critical help in obtaining the data presented here. This work made use of data supplied by the UK Swift Science Data Centre at the University of Leicester.
FEB acknowledges support from ANID-Chile BASAL CATA FB210003, FONDECYT Regular 1241005, and Millennium Science Initiative Program â ICN12_009. PDA acknowledges funding from the Italian Space Agency, contract ASI/INAF no. I/004/11/4 and from the GRAWITA INAF Large Program Grant. AG acknowledges the financial support from the Slovenian Research Agency (P1-0031, I0-0033, J1-8136, J1-2460, N1-0344). BPG acknowledges support from STFC grant No. ST/Y002253/1. YDH acknowledges financial support from INAF through the GRAWITA Large Program Grant (ID: 1.05.12.01.04). LI acknowledges financial support from INAF through the YES Data Grant (ID: 1.05.23.05.15). PGJ has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unionâs Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No. 101095973). JK acknowledges funding from the Walter Gyllenberg Foundation of the Royal Physiographical Society in Lund and the Swedish Research Council (VR: Etableringsbidrag 2017-04945). JM acknowledges financial support of the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFE0101200), National Natural Science Foundation of China 12393813, and the Yunnan Revitalization Talent Support Program (YunLing Scholar Project). DBM is funded by the European Union (ERC, HEAVYMETAL, 101071865). Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. The Cosmic Dawn Center (DAWN) is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation under grant DNRF140. SPRS gratefully acknowledges support from an STFC PhD studentship and the Faculty of Science and Technology at Lancaster University. POB and NRT acknowledge support from STFC grant No. ST/W000857/1. HP acknowledges support by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation with the Ramon y Cajal fellowship number RYC2021-031798-I. AR acknowledges support from PRIN-MIUR 2017 (grant 20179ZF5KS). AS acknowledges support from CNES and DIM-ACAV+. IW is supported by the UKRI Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC). VSD and HiPERCAM are funded by the Science and Technology Facilities Council (grant ST/Z000033/1).
Time since FXT | Telescope/instrument | Band | Exposure time | Magnitude |
---|---|---|---|---|
(days) | (number s) | (AB) | ||
1.086 | GTC/OSIRIS+ | 6120 | 21.74 0.06 | |
1.104 | GTC/OSIRIS+ | 1150 | 21.14 0.04 | |
1.195 | VLT/X-shooter | 460 | 22.68 0.05 | |
1.198 | VLT/X-shooter | 360 | 25.0 | |
1.201 | VLT/X-shooter | 360 | 21.06 0.06 | |
2.015 | TNG/NICS | 4260 | 21.15 0.20 | |
2.041 | GTC/HiPERCAM | 8030 | ||
2.041 | GTC/HiPERCAM | 8030 | 22.32 0.03 | |
2.041 | GTC/HiPERCAM | 8030 | 23.99 0.08 | |
2.041 | GTC/HiPERCAM | 8030 | 22.05 0.03 | |
3.097 | GTC/EMIR | 6723 | 21.09 0.10 | |
3.139 | GTC/EMIR | 19210 | 21.87 0.15 | |
3.194 | NOT/ALFOSC | 27300 | 22.23 0.11 | |
4.045 | GTC/EMIR | 6723 | 21.47 0.12 | |
4.052 | TNG/NICS | 5060 | 21.56 0.19 | |
4.304 | LBT/LUCI | 3063 | 22.49 0.08 | |
6.414 | LBT/LUCI | 4863 | 23.29 0.22 | |
7.233 | VLT/FORS2 | 32120 | 23.92 0.11 | |
16.067 | GTC/OSIRIS+ | 4560 | 24.55 0.41 | |
16.183 | VLT/FORS2 | 22120 | 25.44 0.45 |
4 Methods
Below we describe our observations of EPâ240315a with a range of facilities, and also outline in more detail the consistency of the FXT population with low luminosity GRB-like events. Throughout we use the Planck 2018 cosmology [60], magnitudes are given in the AB system and errors at the 1 level unless otherwise stated.
4.1 Observations
EPâ240315a was discovered using the Einstein Probe [EP; 25, 26] with the first photons detected at 20:10 UT on 15 March 2024 [61], and announced via the general coordinates network (GCN) approximately 20 hours later. The outburst had a duration of âs as measured by the Wide Field X-ray telescope (WXT) onboard EP. The average flux during this period was erg s-1 cm-2 in the 0.5â4 keV band. For a duration of 1600âs, this implies a fluence of erg cm-2.
Although there were no coincident -ray triggers reported, a search in data from both the Swift Burst Alert Telescope, and the Konus-Wind instrument revealed a clear -ray signal which began  s after the onset of activity observed by EP, and lasted for only  s [34, 35]. The total burst fluence was erg cm-2.
Serendipitous observations with the ATLAS telescopes 1.1 hours after the onset of the outburst [40], discovered a new transient ATâ2024eju, with a cyan filter magnitude of 19.37 0.14. The probability of uncovering an unrelated bright transient in the small (3 arcminute radius, 90% containment) error box is low, making this source the prime candidate to be the counterpart of EPâ240315a. This identification was confirmed with the detection of the X-ray afterglow by the EP follow-up X-ray Telescope [62], the optical spectroscopy and X-ray observations described below, and the discovery of a radio counterpart [63].
4.1.1 VLT spectroscopy and photometry
We obtained observations of EPâ240315a with the ESO VLT and X-shooter [64] instrument under programme 110.24CF (PIs Malesani, Tanvir, Vergani), beginning at 01:02:52 UT on 17 March 2024, as soon as the source became visible from Chile. This was 29 hr after the EP source detection, 9 hr after it was reported to the GCN and 3 hr after the ATLAS detection was reported. A faint source was visible in the -band acquisition image, and we obtained spectroscopy of the source with s exposures in the three different arms of X-shooter, covering the wavelength range  à . The -blocking filter was used to improve the signal-to-noise ratio in the and regions of the spectrum. The observations were executed in the ABBA nod-on-slit mode. We adopted the standard X-shooter STARE mode reduction pipeline [65, 66] for the UVB, VIS and NIR arms. Then, flux-calibrated spectra for each exposure were adjusted for slit-loss in each arm, with residual sky features subtracted. The individual spectra were then combined into a final science spectrum using the methods outlined in [67], with the extraction window (1.6âČâČ) positioned and centered accurately at the location of the trace. Additionally, a telluric correction was applied to the final stacked spectra. All wavelenghts were corrected to the vacuum-heliocentric system. The spectrum is shown in Figure 1, the redshift from quick-look analysis was initially reported in [68]. The spectrum shows a strong, sharp break at 7120 à , which we identify as the Ly- break at refined by several absorption features due to Nâv Ă , Ă , SiâivâĂ , Ă and CivâĂ , Ă . Nâv and Siâiv show a single strong component while Câiv has a larger velocity structure towards the blue (see Figure 4). We fit the identified absorption lines with the Astrocook software [69], a Python code environment to analyze spectra modelled with Voigt profiles, depending on the system redshift , its column density , and its Doppler broadening . The column densities we determined are reported in Table 2.
Other absorption lines from multiple intervening systems along the line of sight have been identified. A strong Mgâii foreground systems at (VIS arm) and a Câiv system at are present. Furthermore two other systems are detected at (Mgâii and Feâii) and (Feâii).
Absorption lines | |
---|---|
Civ, â | |
Nâv, | |
Siiv, |
Aside from the narrow spectral features the continuum is reasonably described by a power-law with with . This is typical of the continuum slopes seen in GRB afterglows.
The break at Ly- is particularly sharp, suggesting a rather low column density of Hâi. However, it also contains a narrow feature just redward of the Ly- which suggests a likely contribution from Ly- in emission in the host galaxy. To remove this contribution we obtained a second epoch of X-shooter observations on 31 March 2024 with an identical set-up (slit position, orientation) to the first epoch. This observation reveals a clear detection of Ly- in emission (see Figure 5). The line has a flux of erg cm-2 s-1, and a narrow width of 1.4 à (60 km s-1). The measured redshift of the line is . This suggests that the blue wing is substantially absorbed, and so the actual flux of Ly- is significantly suppressed by the neutral column, which thus only provides a lower limit on the star formation rate in the host galaxy. This rate is calculated to be yr-1 using the conversion of [70]. We note that Ly- emission originates from the galaxy, and the line of sight is not the same as to the GRB itself. Ly- could exhibit both higher or lower column densities than the GRB itself, and is best removed from the spectrum prior to fitting.
Do determine the hydrogen column density on the subtracted spectrum, we model the Ly- absorption edge using the Voigt-profile fitting code VoigtFit [71]. This takes the input spectra and estimates the best-fit column density, , broadening parameter, , and absorption redshift, via a minimization approach of the created absorption-line model convolved with the spectral resolution of the data. Fixing the redshift of the Ly- absorption to that inferred from the more narrow metal lines, , yields . Leaving the redshift of Ly- as a free parameter yields a substantially higher column density, , mostly due to the preferred lower redshift solution at , blueshifted by âkmâs-1 to the main metal line velocity component. Since the low-ion metal content is expected to be mostly embedded in the neutral hydrogen gas, the low-column-density solution is likely the most appropriate, and would be consistent with the detection of leaking ionising radiation.
A striking feature of the first epoch spectroscopy is that inspection of the UVB arm of X-shooter reveals emission from the transient at wavelengths âĂ in the rest frame (see Figure 2). The emission is visible in the range 905â910 Ă in the rest frame. To estimate its significance we use an unbinned, non-smoothed stare reduction of the UVB data, and utilize an aperture 10âĂ long and 3 pixels high and compare the measured flux in this aperture to the mean and standard deviation of 20 equally sized apertures placed at locations within 100â Ă of Ly- but offset from the position of the trace. These results suggest that the leakage is significant at the level. Although the precise significance depends on the choice of central wavelength and aperture size, the overall significance is robust. In the second epoch observations, in which the slit location was identical, we do not observe any sign of emission at this location indicating that any light is arising from the afterglow, and not, for example, from any lower redshift intervening systems.
In addition to our spectroscopy, we also obtained photometric measurements, first with the X-shooter acquisition camera coincident with our first epoch of spectroscopy in the filters. We then obtained two further epochs of -band imaging using FORS2 on 23 March and 31 March 2024. FORS2 observations were reduced through the standard ESO pipelines while X-shooter acquisition cameras images were manually corrected for bias and flat-fields. Observations were calibrated against the Pan-STARRS catalogues and results are given in Table 1.
4.1.2 Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC) spectroscopy and photometry
We obtained observations of EPâ240315a with the OSIRIS+ instrument mounted on the GranTelescopioCanarias (GTC) under programme GTC1-ITP23 (PIs Jonker, Torres), beginning at 22:55:26 UT on 16 March 2024, about 1 hr after the ATLAS detection of an optical counterpart was reported. Three observations of 1200 s each were obtained using the R1000R volume-phased holographic grating. A slit of 1âČâČ width was used. The slit was oriented at the parallactic angle. The data were corrected for bias and flatfield effects and extracted using tasks in iraf. Cosmic rays were removed using lacosmic [72]. Wavelength calibration was done using daytime arc-lamp observations using molly111We thank Tom Marsh for the use of âmollyâ.. Flux calibration was done using observations of the spectrophotometric standard star Hiltner 600 taken through a wide slit (2.52âČâČ) on the same night at UT 21:54:58 at similar airmass as the observations of EPâ240315a.
Photometric observations in the optical were obtained with the GTC using either OSIRIS+ or the HiPERCAM instrument (see Table 1). In addition, GTC near-infrared (NIR) observations were obtained on two nights using the EMIR instrument on 18 March ( and bands) and 19 March 2024 (only ). The EMIR images were reduced using scripts based on python and IRAF [73]. All individual frames are first corrected for readout background in each individual column using overscan information. Flat fields are then created for each observing band and used to correct the scientific data. Flat-corrected science frames are used to create sky background images. The background-only images are normalised to the median flux of each science image and subtracted from it. Finally, these images are aligned and combined to produce the final frame. The world coordinate system information is obtained using astrometry.net codes [74].
4.1.3 Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT)
A -band observation was secured using the Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) at the Roque de los Muchachos observatory (Canary Islands, Spain), using the ALFOSC camera. A standard dithering pattern was used for the observations, and a standard reduction technique was adopted to create the output frame. Photometric calibration was computed by comparison with nearby stars from the Pan-STARRS catalog, with no need to correct for color terms.
4.1.4 Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG)
We performed NIR observations of EPâ240315a using the Near Infrared Camera Spectrometer (NICS) camera in imaging mode on the 3.58 m Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG, Canary Islands, Spain) under the long term observation program A47TAC_42 (PI: A. Melandri). The observation was conducted in two epochs, which started on 2024-3-17 20:10:27 UT (2.0Â d after trigger) and on 2024-3-19 20:50:09 UT (4.0Â d after trigger), respectively. Hour-long observations in band were carried out in both epochs. The image reduction was performed using the jitter task of the ESO-eclipse package222https://www.eso.org/sci/software/eclipse/. The photometric measurements using aperture and point-spread function (PSF)-matched photometry were performed using the DAOPHOT package within IRAF. Magnitudes were calibrated with the nearby reference stars in the field of view listed in the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) catalogue333https://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/Missions/2mass.html.
4.1.5 Large Binocular Telescope (LBT)
We observed the NIR counterpart of EPâ240315a with the Large Binocular Telescope (Mount Graham, Arizona) and the LBT Utility Camera in the Infrared [LUCI, 75] imager and spectrograph, under program IT-2023B-020 (PI Maiorano). -band imaging data were obtained on 2024-03-20 at a mid-time 03:30:00 UT, 4.3Â d after the EP detection, followed by -band observations at mid-time 2024-03-22T05:20:00, 7.4Â d after the trigger. These data were reduced using the data reduction pipeline developed at INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma [76] which includes bias subtraction and flat-fielding, bad pixel and cosmic ray masking, astrometric calibration, and coaddition.
4.1.6 Chandra X-ray Observatory
We further obtained observations with the Chandra X-ray Observatory (DDT programme ID 23495, PI Levan). Two epochs of observations were obtained starting at 19:53 on 18 March 2024 for 9.95 ks and at 04:34 on 26 March 2024 for 18.53 ks. The source was placed at the default location on the ACIS-S3 chip for both observations.
Data were processed using ciao v4.16. Background-subtracted spectra were obtained with the specextract script and grouped as 1 count per bin with the grppha routine from NASAâs High Energy Astrophysics Software [HEASoft; 77] package. Spectral fitting was performed in xspec v12.11.1, using an absorbed power-law model (tbabs * po) with Galactic absorption fixed to âatomsâcm-2 [78], abundances from Wilms et al. [79], and Cash statistics [80]. For the first epoch, the best fit () has a photon index of and an unabsorbed ââkeV flux of âergâs-1âcm-2 as measured with cflux (these error bars are at the 67% confidence level). At the time of the second epoch we only detect a single photon at the source localisation. Using the method of [81] and the measured photon background in the images we obtain a range of 0.1â2.2 counts, or a upper limit of 7.8 counts. Assuming the same spectrum as observed in the first epoch, this corresponds to a measured flux of erg s-1 cm-2.
4.2 FXT and GRB properties
At the isotropic energy release in the 20 keV â 10 MeV range is erg, making the source a relatively energetic GRB. The comparable energy in the X-ray regime (0.5 â 4 keV, observer frame) is erg, approximately a factor of three lower. Although most high-energy transients detected by Swift and Fermi today are given GRB designations there has previously been a broader classification regime including GRBs, X-ray rich GRBs (XRRs) and X-ray flashes (XRFs) [82]. The distinction between GRBs, XRRs and XRFs was typically drawn at [e.g. 19, 83], with the bands largely chosen to be convenient for comparing event fluences detected by the BeppoSAX WFC and HETE-2. Although we do not have the full spectral information to make these comparisons it seems likely that EPâ240315a does belong to the X-ray rich class of bursts via these diagnostics, despite the relatively high peak energy of keV, although we also note that the rather different time intervals considered by Konus-Wind and EP may skew these results. A full analysis of the EP and -ray data could reveal important diagnostics for the GRB prompt emission.
To put the high-energy emission in the context of Swift GRBs, we retrieved from the Swift Burst Analyser [84] the BAT+XRT light curves of GRBs with detected X-ray afterglows and known spectroscopic redshifts. We also downloaded the data products of the high-redshift GRBs 090423, 090429B and 100905A that have only a photometric redshift. In addition, we acquired the X-ray light curves of the relativistic TDEs SwJ1112-82 [85] from the Burst Analyser, SwJ1644+57 [86, 87, 47, 88] from [89], SwJ2058+05 [90] from [91], and ATâ2022cmc [92, 93] from [93]. All BAT data products were built using methods from T. Sakamoto and S. D. Barthelmy (NASA/GSFC) and the XRT data with methods from [94, 95]. The density plot was generated using the methods outlined in [96].
The multi-wavelength properties of EPâ240315a appear to be entirely consistent with those of the GRB population. In particular, the spectral slope from optical/IR photometry and the X-ray spectral slope of are consistent with each other, although given the large error are also consistent with the cooling break lying between the two bands. However, the overall X-ray to optical spectral slope at 3 days post transient, which suggests that the X-ray and optical lie on the same branch of the synchrotron spectrum. The optical decay is also entirely consistent with that observed for long GRBs, as is the optical/IR and X-ray luminosity.
4.3 The link between FXTs and GRBs
In the main text, we argue that a significant fraction of the FXTs observed previously by Chandra and XMM-Newton could be low luminosity GRBs typically observed at high redshift (essentially the low luminosity representations of EPâ240315a). This does not mean that the lower-luminosity events must arise from this channel, since the lower photon energies may enable the identification of new or different phenomena. However, we describe below why additional channels (beyond low luminosity GRBs) are not required to explain the observed populations of FXTs with Chandra and XMM-Newton.
A striking feature of the FXTs, and indeed EPâ240315a is that they have markedly both longer durations than the GRB populations observed by GRB missions such as Swift and Fermi ( is typically  s for FXTs compared to 1â100 s for GRBs), and lower peak luminosities, likely in the erg s-1 range, although robust redshifts are unavailable for many events. However, these may be selection effects. Firstly, as shown in Figure 6, the EP WXT is substantially more sensitive than the Swift BAT for most spectral shapes, and Chandra and XMM-Newton are more sensitive still. Many normal GRBs detected by the EP WXT will be observable by it for several thousand seconds.
Secondly, most GRB detections to date have been based on rate triggers which favour the identification of high peak fluxes. In principle, the physical mechanisms that create GRBs (e.g. accretion or magnetar spin-down) are more constrained by the total available energy, rather than the instantaneous flux. Bursts with very long duration but low peak flux are more difficult to detect, and within the Swift population there is a strong correlation between duration and fluence, such that very long events can only be detected if they have a very high total fluence, as demonstrated in Figure 6. Indeed, the ultra-long GRB population observed by Swift may be under-represented by more than an order of magnitude compared to the true population at the same integrated fluence [39]. This means that ultra-long GRBs are the hard-to-detect tail end of the long-GRB duration distribution [97]. Indeed, the analysis of [97] implies that central engine activity for several thousand seconds is quite common, but that most GRB detectors have higher recovery fractions for bursts with high-peak flux at some point during their outburst.
The combination of these two effects may naturally create much larger populations of FXTs with durations of thousands of seconds than one would expect by simply extrapolating from the duration distribution of GRBs.
The differing luminosities of most GRBs and Chandra/XMM-Newton population of FXTs can be explained because the latter are found in sensitive narrow field instruments that survey small volumes to extreme depths. The redshift rate evolution of GRBs detected by Swift and Fermi is well constrained at brighter luminosities, but despite their far higher source densities, the low-luminosity population is relatively sparsely sampled, and, inevitably is only directly constrained in the local Universe. [98] describe the rate evolution of GRBs across cosmic time (), finding a rapid increase in rate as out to , followed by a comparably rapid decay. This rate density peaks at a higher redshift than the cosmic star formation history, likely because of the metallicity bias in GRB production [99, 100]. Their population model predicts rate densities for bursts with erg s-1. While detection with Chandra and XMM-Newton is based predominantly on fluence, and not peak flux, the typical peak flux limits used in FXT searches of erg s-1 cm-2 [11, 12] imply that these surveys are close to volume-limited for the population of events modeled by [98] out to .
If we are close to the volume-limited scenario, then the actual number of events recovered in these narrow field surveys is strongly dependent on the behavior of the faint end of the luminosity function. In particular, the GRB luminosity function at the faint end typically has a slope in the range of to [55], although it is observationally undefined at the faintest levels. [55] provide the rate evolution over the erg s-1 regime. If this were to continue to erg s-1 the rate increase would be a factor of 1.5â30 (for slopes of to , indicating substantial uncertainty due to the unknown slope at these luminosties). Ultimately, an extrapolation of the luminosity function to lower luminosities must decline to avoid over-production of GRB events, for example, in comparison to type Ib/c supernovae, but its extrapolation to the typical peak luminosities seen in FXTs would provide rates (accounting for beaming) of Gpc-3 yr-1 at , entirely consistent with the uncertain volumetric rates of FXTs observed to date [11, 12], and substantially lower than the supernova rate. Because of the volume-limited nature of these surveys, we expect a high-redshift population, with a median of . In Figure 7, we plot the expected evolution in the rate density for different plausible assumptions including constant rate density, one which follows both the global star formation rate or the low metallicity and the GRB population model of [98], including an extrapolation to lower luminosity. We also convert these into the expected redshift distributions for volume-limited surveys by assuming that the number of events observed at a given redshift shell is simply , where is the comoving volume in the shell and is the rate density. This demonstrates both the consistency of rates (with substantial uncertainty) and the expectation of a predominantly high redshift population in narrow-deep observations (see Figure 7). Given the difficulty in locating GRB host galaxies at , [101, 102], and the typical faintness of the low-luminosity GRB afterglows, the lack of multi-wavelength counterparts and the sparsity of high-confidence host galaxies to many FXTs would be naturally expected in this scenario [e.g. 103, 104].
Since these FXTs are typically faint it will not, in general, be possible to place stringent constraints on the ratio of X-ray to -ray fluxes (see Figure 6, which demonstrates that all lie well below the Swift trigger thresholds), and the correlations between spectral peak and isotropic energy and luminosity would imply that these low luminosity events have spectral peaks in the X-ray regime. Hence, we conclude that a substantial fraction of the observed extragalactic FXTs can originate in GRB-like events. In this regard, one can view the FXTs observed by Chandra and XMM-Newton as the longer duration tail of the population of XRFs observed by BeppoSAX and WFC, where the differences in duration are largely explained by the selection effects described above.
We note that this is an economical explanation in that it does not require additional progenitor channels beyond those already recognised in the GRB population, and the presence of even lower luminosity GRBs than observed is likely. However, it also does not directly identify any given FXT with a progenitor. Furthermore, it is also plausible that soft X-ray detection, rather than -ray detection, preferentially selects progenitor channels that are until now under-represented in GRB samples.
References
- \bibcommenthead
- Petroff et al. [2019] Petroff, E., Hessels, J.W.T., Lorimer, D.R.: Fast radio bursts. A&A Rev. 27(1), 4 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 arXiv:1904.07947 [astro-ph.HE]
- Abbott et al. [2017] Abbott, B.P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T.D., et al.: GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(16), 161101 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]
- Prentice et al. [2018] Prentice, S.J., Maguire, K., Smartt, S.J., Magee, M.R., Schady, P., Sim, S., Chen, T.-W., Clark, P., Colin, C., Fulton, M., McBrien, O., OâNeill, D., Smith, K.W., Ashall, C., Chambers, K.C., Denneau, L., Flewelling, H.A., Heinze, A., Holoien, T.W.-S., Huber, M.E., Kochanek, C.S., Mazzali, P.A., Prieto, J.L., Rest, A., Shappee, B.J., Stalder, B., Stanek, K.Z., Stritzinger, M.D., Thompson, T.A., Tonry, J.L.: The Cow: Discovery of a Luminous, Hot, and Rapidly Evolving Transient. ApJ 865(1), 3 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aadd90 arXiv:1807.05965 [astro-ph.HE]
- Cooke [1976] Cooke, B.A.: Two short lived X-ray transients at high galactic latitude. Nature 261(5561), 564â566 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1038/261564a0
- Rappaport et al. [1976] Rappaport, S., Buff, J., Clark, G., Lewin, W.H.G., Matilsky, T., McClintock, J.: A fast transient source of hard X-rays at high galactic latitude. ApJ 206, 139â142 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1086/182152
- Soderberg et al. [2008] Soderberg, A.M., Berger, E., Page, K.L., Schady, P., Parrent, J., Pooley, D., Wang, X.-Y., Ofek, E.O., Cucchiara, A., Rau, A., Waxman, E., Simon, J.D., Bock, D.C.-J., Milne, P.A., Page, M.J., Barentine, J.C., Barthelmy, S.D., Beardmore, A.P., Bietenholz, M.F., Brown, P., Burrows, A., Burrows, D.N., Byrngelson, G., Cenko, S.B., Chandra, P., Cummings, J.R., Fox, D.B., Gal-Yam, A., Gehrels, N., Immler, S., Kasliwal, M., Kong, A.K.H., Krimm, H.A., Kulkarni, S.R., Maccarone, T.J., MĂ©szĂĄros, P., Nakar, E., OâBrien, P.T., Overzier, R.A., de Pasquale, M., Racusin, J., Rea, N., York, D.G.: An extremely luminous X-ray outburst at the birth of a supernova. Nature 453(7194), 469â474 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06997 arXiv:0802.1712 [astro-ph]
- Jonker et al. [2013] Jonker, P.G., Glennie, A., Heida, M., Maccarone, T., Hodgkin, S., Nelemans, G., Miller-Jones, J.C.A., Torres, M.A.P., Fender, R.: Discovery of a New Kind of Explosive X-Ray Transient near M86. ApJ 779(1), 14 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/14 arXiv:1310.7238 [astro-ph.HE]
- Glennie et al. [2015] Glennie, A., Jonker, P.G., Fender, R.P., Nagayama, T., Pretorius, M.L.: Two fast X-ray transients in archival Chandra data. MNRAS 450(4), 3765â3770 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv801 arXiv:1504.03720 [astro-ph.HE]
- Bauer et al. [2017] Bauer, F.E., Treister, E., Schawinski, K., Schulze, S., Luo, B., Alexander, D.M., Brandt, W.N., Comastri, A., Forster, F., Gilli, R., Kann, D.A., Maeda, K., Nomoto, K., Paolillo, M., Ranalli, P., Schneider, D.P., Shemmer, O., Tanaka, M., Tolstov, A., Tominaga, N., Tozzi, P., Vignali, C., Wang, J., Xue, Y., Yang, G.: A new, faint population of X-ray transients. MNRAS 467(4), 4841â4857 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx417 arXiv:1702.04422 [astro-ph.HE]
- Lin et al. [2022] Lin, D., Irwin, J.A., Berger, E., Nguyen, R.: Discovery of Three Candidate Magnetar-powered Fast X-Ray Transients from Chandra Archival Data. ApJ 927(2), 211 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fc6 arXiv:2201.06754 [astro-ph.HE]
- Quirola-Våsquez et al. [2022] Quirola-Våsquez, J., Bauer, F.E., Jonker, P.G., Brandt, W.N., Yang, G., Levan, A.J., Xue, Y.Q., Eappachen, D., Zheng, X.C., Luo, B.: Extragalactic fast X-ray transient candidates discovered by Chandra (2000-2014). A&A 663, 168 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243047 arXiv:2201.07773 [astro-ph.HE]
- Quirola-Våsquez et al. [2023] Quirola-Våsquez, J., Bauer, F.E., Jonker, P.G., Brandt, W.N., Yang, G., Levan, A.J., Xue, Y.Q., Eappachen, D., Camacho, E., Ravasio, M.E., Zheng, X.C., Luo, B.: Extragalactic fast X-ray transient candidates discovered by Chandra (2014-2022). A&A 675, 44 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202345912 arXiv:2304.13795 [astro-ph.HE]
- Alp and Larsson [2020] Alp, D., Larsson, J.: Blasts from the Past: Supernova Shock Breakouts among X-Ray Transients in the XMM-Newton Archive. ApJ 896(1), 39 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab91ba arXiv:2004.09519 [astro-ph.HE]
- Novara et al. [2020] Novara, G., Esposito, P., Tiengo, A., Vianello, G., Salvaterra, R., Belfiore, A., De Luca, A., DâAvanzo, P., Greiner, J., Scodeggio, M., Rosen, S., Delvaux, C., Pian, E., Campana, S., Lisini, G., Mereghetti, S., Israel, G.L.: A Supernova Candidate at z = 0.092 in XMM-Newton Archival Data. ApJ 898(1), 37 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab98f8 arXiv:2004.10665 [astro-ph.HE]
- Zhang [2013] Zhang, B.: Early X-Ray and Optical Afterglow of Gravitational Wave Bursts from Mergers of Binary Neutron Stars. ApJ 763(1), 22 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/763/1/L22 arXiv:1212.0773 [astro-ph.HE]
- MacLeod et al. [2016] MacLeod, M., Guillochon, J., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Kasen, D., Rosswog, S.: Optical Thermonuclear Transients from Tidal Compression of White Dwarfs as Tracers of the Low End of the Massive Black Hole Mass Function. ApJ 819(1), 3 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/3 arXiv:1508.02399 [astro-ph.HE]
- Waxman and Katz [2017] Waxman, E., Katz, B.: Shock Breakout Theory. In: Alsabti, A.W., Murdin, P. (eds.) Handbook of Supernovae, p. 967 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_33
- Nakar and Piran [2017] Nakar, E., Piran, T.: The Observable Signatures of GRB Cocoons. ApJ 834(1), 28 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/28 arXiv:1610.05362 [astro-ph.HE]
- Sakamoto et al. [2004] Sakamoto, T., Lamb, D.Q., Graziani, C., Donaghy, T.Q., Suzuki, M., Ricker, G., Atteia, J.-L., Kawai, N., Yoshida, A., Shirasaki, Y., Tamagawa, T., Torii, K., Matsuoka, M., Fenimore, E.E., Galassi, M., Tavenner, T., Doty, J., Vanderspek, R., Crew, G.B., Villasenor, J., Butler, N., Prigozhin, G., Jernigan, J.G., Barraud, C., Boer, M., Dezalay, J.-P., Olive, J.-F., Hurley, K., Levine, A., Monnelly, G., Martel, F., Morgan, E., Woosley, S.E., Cline, T., Braga, J., Manchanda, R., Pizzichini, G., Takagishi, K., Yamauchi, M.: High Energy Transient Explorer 2 Observations of the Extremely Soft X-Ray Flash XRF 020903. ApJ 602(2), 875â885 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1086/381232
- Pian et al. [2006] Pian, E., Mazzali, P.A., Masetti, N., Ferrero, P., Klose, S., Palazzi, E., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Woosley, S.E., Kouveliotou, C., Deng, J., Filippenko, A.V., Foley, R.J., Fynbo, J.P.U., Kann, D.A., Li, W., Hjorth, J., Nomoto, K., Patat, F., Sauer, D.N., Sollerman, J., Vreeswijk, P.M., Guenther, E.W., Levan, A., OâBrien, P., Tanvir, N.R., Wijers, R.A.M.J., Dumas, C., Hainaut, O., Wong, D.S., Baade, D., Wang, L., Amati, L., Cappellaro, E., Castro-Tirado, A.J., Ellison, S., Frontera, F., Fruchter, A.S., Greiner, J., Kawabata, K., Ledoux, C., Maeda, K., MĂžller, P., Nicastro, L., Rol, E., Starling, R.: An optical supernova associated with the X-ray flash XRF 060218. Nature 442(7106), 1011â1013 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05082 arXiv:astro-ph/0603530 [astro-ph]
- Soderberg et al. [2004] Soderberg, A.M., Kulkarni, S.R., Berger, E., Fox, D.B., Price, P.A., Yost, S.A., Hunt, M.P., Frail, D.A., Walker, R.C., Hamuy, M., Shectman, S.A., Halpern, J.P., Mirabal, N.: A Redshift Determination for XRF 020903: First Spectroscopic Observations of an X-Ray Flash. ApJ 606(2), 994â999 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1086/383082 arXiv:astro-ph/0311050 [astro-ph]
- Levan et al. [2005] Levan, A., Patel, S., Kouveliotou, C., Fruchter, A., Rhoads, J., Rol, E., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Gorosabel, J., Hjorth, J., Wijers, R., Wood-Vasey, W.M., Bersier, D., Castro-Tirado, A., Fynbo, J., Jensen, B., Pian, E., Tanvir, N., Thorsett, S., Woosley, S.: A Deep Search with the Hubble Space Telescope for Late-Time Supernova Signatures in the Hosts of XRF 011030 and XRF 020427. ApJ 622(2), 977â985 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1086/426938 arXiv:astro-ph/0410560 [astro-ph]
- Soderberg et al. [2005] Soderberg, A.M., Kulkarni, S.R., Fox, D.B., Berger, E., Price, P.A., Cenko, S.B., Howell, D.A., Gal-Yam, A., Leonard, D.C., Frail, D.A., Moon, D., Chevalier, R.A., Hamuy, M., Hurley, K.C., Kelson, D., Koviak, K., Krzeminski, W., Kumar, P., MacFadyen, A., McCarthy, P.J., Park, H.S., Peterson, B.A., Phillips, M.M., Rauch, M., Roth, M., Schmidt, B.P., Shectman, S.: An HST Search for Supernovae Accompanying X-Ray Flashes. ApJ 627(2), 877â887 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1086/430405 arXiv:astro-ph/0502553 [astro-ph]
- Nemiroff [1994] Nemiroff, R.J.: A Century of Gamma Ray Burst Models. Comments on Astrophysics 17, 189 (1994) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9402012 arXiv:astro-ph/9402012 [astro-ph]
- Yuan et al. [2015] Yuan, W., Zhang, C., Feng, H., Zhang, S.N., Ling, Z.X., Zhao, D., Deng, J., Qiu, Y., Osborne, J.P., OâBrien, P., Willingale, R., Lapington, J., Fraser, G.W., the Einstein Probe team: Einstein Probe - a small mission to monitor and explore the dynamic X-ray Universe. arXiv e-prints, 1506â07735 (2015) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.07735 arXiv:1506.07735 [astro-ph.HE]
- Yuan et al. [2022] Yuan, W., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., Ling, Z.: The Einstein Probe Mission. arXiv e-prints, 2209â09763 (2022) arXiv:2209.09763 [astro-ph.HE]
- Tanvir et al. [2021] Tanvir, N.R., Le Flocâh, E., Christensen, L., Caruana, J., Salvaterra, R., Ghirlanda, G., Ciardi, B., Maio, U., DâOdorico, V., Piedipalumbo, E., Campana, S., Noterdaeme, P., Graziani, L., Amati, L., Bagoly, Z., BalĂĄzs, L.G., Basa, S., Behar, E., De Cia, A., Della Valle, M., De Pasquale, M., Frontera, F., Gomboc, A., Götz, D., Horvath, I., Hudec, R., Mereghetti, S., OâBrien, P.T., Osborne, J.P., Paltani, S., Rosati, P., Sergijenko, O., Stanway, E.R., SzĂ©csi, D., Toth, L.V., Urata, Y., Vergani, S., Zane, S.: Exploration of the high-redshift universe enabled by THESEUS. Experimental Astronomy 52(3), 219â244 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-021-09778-w arXiv:2104.09532 [astro-ph.IM]
- Tanvir et al. [2012] Tanvir, N.R., Levan, A.J., Fruchter, A.S., Fynbo, J.P.U., Hjorth, J., Wiersema, K., Bremer, M.N., Rhoads, J., Jakobsson, P., OâBrien, P.T., Stanway, E.R., Bersier, D., Natarajan, P., Greiner, J., Watson, D., Castro-Tirado, A.J., Wijers, R.A.M.J., Starling, R.L.C., Misra, K., Graham, J.F., Kouveliotou, C.: Star Formation in the Early Universe: Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg. ApJ 754(1), 46 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/46 arXiv:1201.6074 [astro-ph.CO]
- Heintz et al. [2023] Heintz, K.E., De Cia, A., Thöne, C.C., Krogager, J.-K., Yates, R.M., Vejlgaard, S., Konstantopoulou, C., Fynbo, J.P.U., Watson, D., Narayanan, D., Wilson, S.N., Arabsalmani, M., Campana, S., DâElia, V., De Pasquale, M., Hartmann, D.H., Izzo, L., Jakobsson, P., Kouveliotou, C., Levan, A., Li, Q., Malesani, D.B., Melandri, A., Milvang-Jensen, B., MĂžller, P., Palazzi, E., Palmerio, J., Petitjean, P., Pugliese, G., Rossi, A., Saccardi, A., Salvaterra, R., Savaglio, S., Schady, P., Stratta, G., Tanvir, N.R., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Vergani, S.D., Wiersema, K., Wijers, R.A.M.J., Zafar, T.: The cosmic buildup of dust and metals. Accurate abundances from GRB-selected star-forming galaxies at 1.7 ÂĄ z ÂĄ 6.3. A&A 679, 91 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347418 arXiv:2308.14812 [astro-ph.GA]
- Fausey et al. [2024] Fausey, H.M., Vejlgaard, S., van der Horst, A.J., Heintz, K.E., Izzo, L., Malesani, D.B., Wiersema, K., Fynbo, J.P.U., Tanvir, N.R., Vergani, S.D., Saccardi, A., Rossi, A., Campana, S., Covino, S., DâElia, V., De Pasquale, M., Hartmann, D., Jakobsson, P., Kouveliotou, C., Levan, A., Martin-Carrillo, A., Melandri, A., Palmerio, J., Pugliese, G., Salvaterra, R.: Neutral Fraction of Hydrogen in the Intergalactic Medium Surrounding High-Redshift Gamma-Ray Burst 210905A. arXiv e-prints, 2403â13126 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.13126 arXiv:2403.13126 [astro-ph.HE]
- Tanvir et al. [2019] Tanvir, N.R., Fynbo, J.P.U., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Japelj, J., Wiersema, K., Malesani, D., Perley, D.A., Levan, A.J., Selsing, J., Cenko, S.B., Kann, D.A., Milvang-Jensen, B., Berger, E., Cano, Z., Chornock, R., Covino, S., Cucchiara, A., DâElia, V., Gargiulo, A., Goldoni, P., Gomboc, A., Heintz, K.E., Hjorth, J., Izzo, L., Jakobsson, P., Kaper, L., KrĂŒhler, T., Laskar, T., Myers, M., Piranomonte, S., Pugliese, G., Rossi, A., SĂĄnchez-RamĂrez, R., Schulze, S., Sparre, M., Stanway, E.R., Tagliaferri, G., Thöne, C.C., Vergani, S., Vreeswijk, P.M., Wijers, R.A.M.J., Watson, D., Xu, D.: The fraction of ionizing radiation from massive stars that escapes to the intergalactic medium. MNRAS 483(4), 5380â5408 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3460 arXiv:1805.07318 [astro-ph.GA]
- Vielfaure et al. [2020] Vielfaure, J.-B., Vergani, S.D., Japelj, J., Fynbo, J.P.U., Gronke, M., Heintz, K.E., Malesani, D.B., Petitjean, P., Tanvir, N.R., DâElia, V., Kann, D.A., Palmerio, J.T., Salvaterra, R., Wiersema, K., Arabsalmani, M., Campana, S., Covino, S., De Pasquale, M., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Hammer, F., Hartmann, D.H., Jakobsson, P., Kouveliotou, C., Laskar, T., Levan, A.J., Rossi, A.: Lyman continuum leakage in faint star-forming galaxies at redshift z = 3-3.5 probed by gamma-ray bursts. A&A 641, 30 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038316 arXiv:2006.09377 [astro-ph.GA]
- Zhang et al. [2024] Zhang, W.J., Mao, X., Zhang, W.D., Liu, H.Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, C., Ling, Z.X., Jin, C.C., Cheng, H.Q., Chen, W., Cui, C.Z., Fan, D.W., Hu, H.B., Hu, J.W., Huang, M.H., Li, D.Y., Lian, T.Y., Liu, M.J., Lv, Z.Z., Pan, H.W., Pan, X., Sun, H., Wang, W.X., Wang, Y.L., Wu, Q.Y., Xu, X.P., Xu, Y.F., Yang, H.N., Zhang, M., Zhang, S.N., Zhang, Z., Zhao, D.H., Kuulkers, E., OâBrien, P., Yuan, W., Einstein Probe team: Einstein Probe detected of a fast X-ray transient EP240315a. GRB Coordinates Network 35931, 1 (2024)
- Svinkin et al. [2024] Svinkin, D., Frederiks, D., Lysenko, A., Ridnaia, A., Tsvetkova, A., Ulanov, M., Cline, T., Konus-Wind Team: Konus-Wind detection of GRB 240315C (possible counterpart of EP240315a). GRB Coordinates Network 35972, 1 (2024)
- DeLaunay et al. [2024] DeLaunay, J., Tohuvavohu, A., Svinkin, D., Ronchini, S., Raman, G., Kennea, J.A., Parsotan, T.: GRB 240315C / X-ray transient EP240315a: Swift/BAT detection. GRB Coordinates Network 35971, 1 (2024)
- Piro et al. [2005] Piro, L., De Pasquale, M., Soffitta, P., Lazzati, D., Amati, L., Costa, E., Feroci, M., Frontera, F., Guidorzi, C., inât Zand, J.M.J., Montanari, E., Nicastro, L.: Probing the Environment in Gamma-Ray Bursts: The Case of an X-Ray Precursor, Afterglow Late Onset, and Wind Versus Constant Density Profile in GRB 011121 and GRB 011211. ApJ 623(1), 314â324 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1086/428377 arXiv:astro-ph/0412589 [astro-ph]
- Frontera et al. [2000] Frontera, F., Antonelli, L.A., Amati, L., Montanari, E., Costa, E., Dal Fiume, D., Giommi, P., Feroci, M., Gennaro, G., Heise, J., Masetti, N., Muller, J.M., Nicastro, L., Orlandini, M., Palazzi, E., Pian, E., Piro, L., Soffitta, P., Stornelli, M., in ât Zand, J.J.M., Frail, D.A., Kulkarni, S.R., Vietri, M.: Prompt and Afterglow Emission from the X-Ray-Rich GRB 981226 Observed withBeppoSAX. ApJ 540(2), 697â703 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1086/309369 arXiv:astro-ph/0002527 [astro-ph]
- in ât Zand et al. [1999] in ât Zand, J.J.M., Heise, J., van Paradijs, J., Fenimore, E.E.: The Prompt X-Ray Emission of Gamma-Ray Burst 980519. ApJ 516(2), 57â60 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1086/312002
- Levan et al. [2014] Levan, A.J., Tanvir, N.R., Starling, R.L.C., Wiersema, K., Page, K.L., Perley, D.A., Schulze, S., Wynn, G.A., Chornock, R., Hjorth, J., Cenko, S.B., Fruchter, A.S., OâBrien, P.T., Brown, G.C., Tunnicliffe, R.L., Malesani, D., Jakobsson, P., Watson, D., Berger, E., Bersier, D., Cobb, B.E., Covino, S., Cucchiara, A., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Fox, D.B., Gal-Yam, A., Goldoni, P., Gorosabel, J., Kaper, L., KrĂŒhler, T., Karjalainen, R., Osborne, J.P., Pian, E., SĂĄnchez-RamĂrez, R., Schmidt, B., Skillen, I., Tagliaferri, G., Thöne, C., Vaduvescu, O., Wijers, R.A.M.J., Zauderer, B.A.: A New Population of Ultra-long Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts. ApJ 781(1), 13 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/13 arXiv:1302.2352 [astro-ph.HE]
- Srivastav et al. [2024] Srivastav, S., Smartt, S.J., Fulton, M.D., Smith, K.W., Aamer, A., Angus, C.R., McCollum, M., Moore, T., Nicholl, M., Sheng, X., Weston, J., Young, D.R., Ramsden, P., Shingles, L., Andersson, A., Gillanders, J.H., Rhodes, L., Stevance, H., Sommer, J., Denneau, L., Tonry, J., Weiland, H., Lawrence, A., Siverd, R., Erasmus, N., Koorts, W., Jordan, A., Suc, V., Rest, A., Chen, T.-W., Stubbs, C.: X-ray transient EP240315a: ATLAS detection of a possible optical counterpart AT2024eju. GRB Coordinates Network 35932, 1 (2024)
- Gillanders et al. [2024] Gillanders, J.H., Rhodes, L., Srivastav, S., Carotenuto, F., Bright, J., Huber, M.E., Stevance, H.F., Smartt, S.J., Chambers, K.C., Chen, T.-W., Fender, R., Andersson, A., Cooper, A.J., Jonker, P.G., Cowie, F.J., deBoer, T., Erasmus, N., Fulton, M.D., Gao, H., Herman, J., Lin, C.-C., Lowe, T., Magnier, E.A., Miao, H.-Y., Minguez, P., Moore, T., Ngeow, C.-C., Nicholl, M., Pan, Y.-C., Pignata, G., Rest, A., Sheng, X., Smith, I.A., Smith, K.W., Tonry, J.L., Wainscoat, R.J., Weston, J., Yang, S., Young, D.R.: Discovery of the optical and radio counterpart to the fast X-ray transient EP240315a. arXiv e-prints, 2404â10660 (2024) https://doi.org/%****âŁclr-sn-article.bblâŁLineâŁ1325âŁ****10.48550/arXiv.2404.10660 arXiv:2404.10660 [astro-ph.HE]
- Quirola-VĂĄsquez et al. [2024] Quirola-VĂĄsquez, J., Jonker, P.G., Levan, A.J., Bauer, F.E., Malesani, D.B., Ravasio, M.E., Torres, M.A.P., GarcĂa, A.M.: X-ray transient EP240315a: GTC/OSIRIS spectroscopic redshift confirmation. GRB Coordinates Network 35960, 1 (2024)
- Saccardi et al. [2024] Saccardi, A., Levan, A.J., Zhu, Z., Gompertz, B.P., Vergani, S.D., Pugliese, G., Xu, D., Malesani, D.B., Stargate Collaboration: X-ray transient EP240315a: VLT/X-shooter spectroscopic redshift of z = 4.859. GRB Coordinates Network 35936, 1 (2024)
- Liu [2024] Liu: Soft X-ray prompt emission from a high-redshift gamma-ray burst (2024) [astro-ph.HE]
- Wolfe et al. [2005] Wolfe, A.M., Gawiser, E., Prochaska, J.X.: Damped Ly Systems. ARA&A 43(1), 861â918 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.133950 arXiv:astro-ph/0509481 [astro-ph]
- Burrows et al. [2011] Burrows, D.N., Kennea, J.A., Ghisellini, G., Mangano, V., Zhang, B., Page, K.L., Eracleous, M., Romano, P., Sakamoto, T., Falcone, A.D., Osborne, J.P., Campana, S., Beardmore, A.P., Breeveld, A.A., Chester, M.M., Corbet, R., Covino, S., Cummings, J.R., DâAvanzo, P., DâElia, V., Esposito, P., Evans, P.A., Fugazza, D., Gelbord, J.M., Hiroi, K., Holland, S.T., Huang, K.Y., Im, M., Israel, G., Jeon, Y., Jeon, Y.-B., Jun, H.D., Kawai, N., Kim, J.H., Krimm, H.A., Marshall, F.E., P. MĂ©szĂĄros, Negoro, H., Omodei, N., Park, W.-K., Perkins, J.S., Sugizaki, M., Sung, H.-I., Tagliaferri, G., Troja, E., Ueda, Y., Urata, Y., Usui, R., Antonelli, L.A., Barthelmy, S.D., Cusumano, G., Giommi, P., Melandri, A., Perri, M., Racusin, J.L., Sbarufatti, B., Siegel, M.H., Gehrels, N.: Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole. Nature 476(7361), 421â424 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10374 arXiv:1104.4787 [astro-ph.HE]
- Levan et al. [2011] Levan, A.J., Tanvir, N.R., Cenko, S.B., Perley, D.A., Wiersema, K., Bloom, J.S., Fruchter, A.S., de Ugarte Postigo, A., OâBrien, P.T., Butler, N., van der Horst, A.J., Leloudas, G., Morgan, A.N., Misra, K., Bower, G.C., Farihi, J., Tunnicliffe, R.L., Modjaz, M., Silverman, J.M., Hjorth, J., Thöne, C., Cucchiara, A., CerĂłn, J.M.C., Castro-Tirado, A.J., Arnold, J.A., Bremer, M., Brodie, J.P., Carroll, T., Cooper, M.C., Curran, P.A., Cutri, R.M., Ehle, J., Forbes, D., Fynbo, J., Gorosabel, J., Graham, J., Hoffman, D.I., Guziy, S., Jakobsson, P., Kamble, A., Kerr, T., Kasliwal, M.M., Kouveliotou, C., Kocevski, D., Law, N.M., Nugent, P.E., Ofek, E.O., Poznanski, D., Quimby, R.M., Rol, E., Romanowsky, A.J., SĂĄnchez-RamĂrez, R., Schulze, S., Singh, N., van Spaandonk, L., Starling, R.L.C., Strom, R.G., Tello, J.C., Vaduvescu, O., Wheatley, P.J., Wijers, R.A.M.J., Winters, J.M., Xu, D.: An Extremely Luminous Panchromatic Outburst from the Nucleus of a Distant Galaxy. Science 333(6039), 199 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207143 arXiv:1104.3356 [astro-ph.HE]
- Greiner et al. [2015] Greiner, J., Mazzali, P.A., Kann, D.A., KrĂŒhler, T., Pian, E., Prentice, S., Olivares E., F., Rossi, A., Klose, S., Taubenberger, S., Knust, F., Afonso, P.M.J., Ashall, C., Bolmer, J., Delvaux, C., Diehl, R., Elliott, J., Filgas, R., Fynbo, J.P.U., Graham, J.F., Guelbenzu, A.N., Kobayashi, S., Leloudas, G., Savaglio, S., Schady, P., Schmidl, S., Schweyer, T., Sudilovsky, V., Tanga, M., Updike, A.C., van Eerten, H., Varela, K.: A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long -ray burst. Nature 523(7559), 189â192 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14579 arXiv:1509.03279 [astro-ph.HE]
- Rastinejad et al. [2022] Rastinejad, J.C., Gompertz, B.P., Levan, A.J., Fong, W.-f., Nicholl, M., Lamb, G.P., Malesani, D.B., Nugent, A.E., Oates, S.R., Tanvir, N.R., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Kilpatrick, C.D., Moore, C.J., Metzger, B.D., Ravasio, M.E., Rossi, A., Schroeder, G., Jencson, J., Sand, D.J., Smith, N., AgĂŒĂ FernĂĄndez, J.F., Berger, E., Blanchard, P.K., Chornock, R., Cobb, B.E., De Pasquale, M., Fynbo, J.P.U., Izzo, L., Kann, D.A., Laskar, T., Marini, E., Paterson, K., Escorial, A.R., Sears, H.M., Thöne, C.C.: A kilonova following a long-duration gamma-ray burst at 350 Mpc. Nature 612(7939), 223â227 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05390-w arXiv:2204.10864 [astro-ph.HE]
- Troja et al. [2022] Troja, E., Fryer, C.L., OâConnor, B., Ryan, G., Dichiara, S., Kumar, A., Ito, N., Gupta, R., Wollaeger, R.T., Norris, J.P., Kawai, N., Butler, N.R., Aryan, A., Misra, K., Hosokawa, R., Murata, K.L., Niwano, M., Pandey, S.B., Kutyrev, A., van Eerten, H.J., Chase, E.A., Hu, Y.-D., Caballero-Garcia, M.D., Castro-Tirado, A.J.: A nearby long gamma-ray burst from a merger of compact objects. Nature 612(7939), 228â231 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05327-3 arXiv:2209.03363 [astro-ph.HE]
- Levan et al. [2024] Levan, A.J., Gompertz, B.P., Salafia, O.S., Bulla, M., Burns, E., Hotokezaka, K., Izzo, L., Lamb, G.P., Malesani, D.B., Oates, S.R., Ravasio, M.E., Rouco Escorial, A., Schneider, B., Sarin, N., Schulze, S., Tanvir, N.R., Ackley, K., Anderson, G., Brammer, G.B., Christensen, L., Dhillon, V.S., Evans, P.A., Fausnaugh, M., Fong, W.-f., Fruchter, A.S., Fryer, C., Fynbo, J.P.U., Gaspari, N., Heintz, K.E., Hjorth, J., Kennea, J.A., Kennedy, M.R., Laskar, T., Leloudas, G., Mandel, I., Martin-Carrillo, A., Metzger, B.D., Nicholl, M., Nugent, A., Palmerio, J.T., Pugliese, G., Rastinejad, J., Rhodes, L., Rossi, A., Saccardi, A., Smartt, S.J., Stevance, H.F., Tohuvavohu, A., van der Horst, A., Vergani, S.D., Watson, D., Barclay, T., Bhirombhakdi, K., Breedt, E., Breeveld, A.A., Brown, A.J., Campana, S., Chrimes, A.A., DâAvanzo, P., DâElia, V., De Pasquale, M., Dyer, M.J., Galloway, D.K., Garbutt, J.A., Green, M.J., Hartmann, D.H., Jakobsson, P., Kerry, P., Kouveliotou, C., Langeroodi, D., Le Flocâh, E., Leung, J.K., Littlefair, S.P., Munday, J., OâBrien, P., Parsons, S.G., Pelisoli, I., Sahman, D.I., Salvaterra, R., Sbarufatti, B., Steeghs, D., Tagliaferri, G., Thöne, C.C., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Kann, D.A.: Heavy-element production in a compact object merger observed by JWST. Nature 626(8000), 737â741 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06759-1 arXiv:2307.02098 [astro-ph.HE]
- Yang et al. [2024] Yang, Y.-H., Troja, E., OâConnor, B., Fryer, C.L., Im, M., Durbak, J., Paek, G.S.H., Ricci, R., Bom, C.R., Gillanders, J.H., Castro-Tirado, A.J., Peng, Z.-K., Dichiara, S., Ryan, G., van Eerten, H., Dai, Z.-G., Chang, S.-W., Choi, H., De, K., Hu, Y., Kilpatrick, C.D., Kutyrev, A., Jeong, M., Lee, C.-U., Makler, M., Navarete, F., PĂ©rez-GarcĂa, I.: A lanthanide-rich kilonova in the aftermath of a long gamma-ray burst. Nature 626(8000), 742â745 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06979-5 arXiv:2308.00638 [astro-ph.HE]
- Mandel and Broekgaarden [2022] Mandel, I., Broekgaarden, F.S.: Rates of compact object coalescences. Living Reviews in Relativity 25(1), 1 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-021-00034-3 arXiv:2107.14239 [astro-ph.HE]
- Maguire et al. [2020] Maguire, K., Eracleous, M., Jonker, P.G., MacLeod, M., Rosswog, S.: Tidal Disruptions of White Dwarfs: Theoretical Models and Observational Prospects. Space Sci. Rev. 216(3), 39 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00661-2 arXiv:2004.00146 [astro-ph.HE]
- Pescalli et al. [2015] Pescalli, A., Ghirlanda, G., Salafia, O.S., Ghisellini, G., Nappo, F., Salvaterra, R.: Luminosity function and jet structure of Gamma-Ray Burst. MNRAS 447(2), 1911â1921 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2482 arXiv:1409.1213 [astro-ph.HE]
- Jakobsson et al. [2006] Jakobsson, P., Levan, A., Fynbo, J.P.U., Priddey, R., Hjorth, J., Tanvir, N., Watson, D., Jensen, B.L., Sollerman, J., Natarajan, P., Gorosabel, J., Castro CerĂłn, J.M., Pedersen, K., Pursimo, T., ĂrnadĂłttir, A.S., Castro-Tirado, A.J., Davis, C.J., Deeg, H.J., Fiuza, D.A., Mikolaitis, S., Sousa, S.G.: A mean redshift of 2.8 for Swift gamma-ray bursts. A&A 447(3), 897â903 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054287 arXiv:astro-ph/0509888 [astro-ph]
- Amati et al. [2021] Amati, L., OâBrien, P.T., Götz, D., Bozzo, E., Santangelo, A., Tanvir, N., Frontera, F., Mereghetti, S., Osborne, J.P., Blain, A., Basa, S., Branchesi, M., Burderi, L., Caballero-GarcĂa, M., Castro-Tirado, A.J., Christensen, L., Ciolfi, R., De Rosa, A., Doroshenko, V., Ferrara, A., Ghirlanda, G., Hanlon, L., Heddermann, P., Hutchinson, I., Labanti, C., Le Floch, E., Lerman, H., Paltani, S., Reglero, V., Rezzolla, L., Rosati, P., Salvaterra, R., Stratta, G., Tenzer, C., Theseus Consortium: The THESEUS space mission: science goals, requirements and mission concept. Experimental Astronomy 52(3), 183â218 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-021-09807-8 arXiv:2104.09531 [astro-ph.IM]
- Christensen et al. [2011] Christensen, L., Fynbo, J.P.U., Prochaska, J.X., Thöne, C.C., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Jakobsson, P.: A High Signal-to-noise Ratio Composite Spectrum of Gamma-ray Burst Afterglows. ApJ 727(2), 73 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/73 arXiv:1011.0734 [astro-ph.CO]
- Dhillon et al. [2021] Dhillon, V.S., Bezawada, N., Black, M., Dixon, S.D., Gamble, T., Gao, X., Henry, D.M., Kerry, P., Littlefair, S.P., Lunney, D.W., Marsh, T.R., Miller, C., Parsons, S.G., Ashley, R.P., Breedt, E., Brown, A., Dyer, M.J., Green, M.J., Pelisoli, I., Sahman, D.I., Wild, J., Ives, D.J., Mehrgan, L., Stegmeier, J., Dubbeldam, C.M., Morris, T.J., Osborn, J., Wilson, R.W., Casares, J., Muñoz-Darias, T., PallĂ©, E., RodrĂguez-Gil, P., Shahbaz, T., Torres, M.A.P., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Cabrera-Lavers, A., Corradi, R.L.M., DomĂnguez, R.D., GarcĂa-Alvarez, D.: HiPERCAM: a quintuple-beam, high-speed optical imager on the 10.4-m Gran Telescopio Canarias. MNRAS 507(1), 350â366 (2021) https://doi.org/%****âŁclr-sn-article.bblâŁLineâŁ2025âŁ****10.1093/mnras/stab2130 arXiv:2107.10124 [astro-ph.IM]
- Planck Collaboration et al. [2020] Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A.J., Barreiro, R.B., Bartolo, N., Basak, S., Battye, R., Benabed, K., Bernard, J.-P., Bersanelli, M., Bielewicz, P., Bock, J.J., Bond, J.R., Borrill, J., Bouchet, F.R., Boulanger, F., Bucher, M., Burigana, C., Butler, R.C., Calabrese, E., Cardoso, J.-F., Carron, J., Challinor, A., Chiang, H.C., Chluba, J., Colombo, L.P.L., Combet, C., Contreras, D., Crill, B.P., Cuttaia, F., de Bernardis, P., de Zotti, G., Delabrouille, J., Delouis, J.-M., Di Valentino, E., Diego, J.M., DorĂ©, O., Douspis, M., Ducout, A., Dupac, X., Dusini, S., Efstathiou, G., Elsner, F., EnĂlin, T.A., Eriksen, H.K., Fantaye, Y., Farhang, M., Fergusson, J., Fernandez-Cobos, R., Finelli, F., Forastieri, F., Frailis, M., Fraisse, A.A., Franceschi, E., Frolov, A., Galeotta, S., Galli, S., Ganga, K., GĂ©nova-Santos, R.T., Gerbino, M., Ghosh, T., GonzĂĄlez-Nuevo, J., GĂłrski, K.M., Gratton, S., Gruppuso, A., Gudmundsson, J.E., Hamann, J., Handley, W., Hansen, F.K., Herranz, D., Hildebrandt, S.R., Hivon, E., Huang, Z., Jaffe, A.H., Jones, W.C., Karakci, A., KeihĂ€nen, E., Keskitalo, R., Kiiveri, K., Kim, J., Kisner, T.S., Knox, L., Krachmalnicoff, N., Kunz, M., Kurki-Suonio, H., Lagache, G., Lamarre, J.-M., Lasenby, A., Lattanzi, M., Lawrence, C.R., Le Jeune, M., Lemos, P., Lesgourgues, J., Levrier, F., Lewis, A., Liguori, M., Lilje, P.B., Lilley, M., Lindholm, V., LĂłpez-Caniego, M., Lubin, P.M., Ma, Y.-Z., MacĂas-PĂ©rez, J.F., Maggio, G., Maino, D., Mandolesi, N., Mangilli, A., Marcos-Caballero, A., Maris, M., Martin, P.G., Martinelli, M., MartĂnez-GonzĂĄlez, E., Matarrese, S., Mauri, N., McEwen, J.D., Meinhold, P.R., Melchiorri, A., Mennella, A., Migliaccio, M., Millea, M., Mitra, S., Miville-DeschĂȘnes, M.-A., Molinari, D., Montier, L., Morgante, G., Moss, A., Natoli, P., NĂžrgaard-Nielsen, H.U., Pagano, L., Paoletti, D., Partridge, B., Patanchon, G., Peiris, H.V., Perrotta, F., Pettorino, V., Piacentini, F., Polastri, L., Polenta, G., Puget, J.-L., Rachen, J.P., Reinecke, M., Remazeilles, M., Renzi, A., Rocha, G., Rosset, C., Roudier, G., Rubiño-MartĂn, J.A., Ruiz-Granados, B., Salvati, L., Sandri, M., Savelainen, M., Scott, D., Shellard, E.P.S., Sirignano, C., Sirri, G., Spencer, L.D., Sunyaev, R., Suur-Uski, A.-S., Tauber, J.A., Tavagnacco, D., Tenti, M., Toffolatti, L., Tomasi, M., Trombetti, T., Valenziano, L., Valiviita, J., Van Tent, B., Vibert, L., Vielva, P., Villa, F., Vittorio, N., Wandelt, B.D., Wehus, I.K., White, M., White, S.D.M., Zacchei, A., Zonca, A.: Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. A&A 641, 6 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]
- Zhang et al. [2024] Zhang, W.J., Mao, X., Zhang, W.D., Liu, H.Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, C., Ling, Z.X., Jin, C.C., Cheng, H.Q., Chen, W., Cui, C.Z., Fan, D.W., Hu, H.B., Hu, J.W., Huang, M.H., Li, D.Y., Lian, T.Y., Liu, M.J., Lv, Z.Z., Pan, H.W., Pan, X., Sun, H., Wang, W.X., Wang, Y.L., Wu, Q.Y., Xu, X.P., Xu, Y.F., Yang, H.N., Zhang, M., Zhang, S.N., Zhang, Z., Zhao, D.H., Kuulkers, E., OâBrien, P., Yuan, W., Einstein Probe team: Einstein Probe detected of a fast X-ray transient EP240315a. GRB Coordinates Network 35931, 1 (2024)
- Chen et al. [2024] Chen, Y., Jia, S.M., Cui, W.W., Li, C.K., Han, D.W., Wang, J., Li, W., Zhao, X.F., Xu, J.J., Zhao, H.S., Guan, J., Zhang, J., Song, L.M., Lu, F.J., Liu, C.Z., Zhang, S.N., Zhang, W.J., Mao, X., Zhang, W.D., Li, D.Y., Lian, T.Y., Liu, Y., Yuan, W., Nandra, K., Rau, A., Friedrich, P., Meidinger, N., Burwitz, V., Kuulkers, E., Santovincenzo, A., OâBrien, P., Cordier, B., Einstein Probe Team: X-ray transient EP240315a: EP-FXT detection of the X-ray afterglow. GRB Coordinates Network 35951, 1 (2024)
- Carotenuto et al. [2024] Carotenuto, F., Bright, J., Jonker, P.G., Fender, R., Rhodes, L.: X-ray transient EP240315a: MeerKAT radio detection. GRB Coordinates Network 35961, 1 (2024)
- Vernet et al. [2011] Vernet, J., Dekker, H., DâOdorico, S., Kaper, L., Kjaergaard, P., Hammer, F., Randich, S., Zerbi, F., Groot, P.J., Hjorth, J., Guinouard, I., Navarro, R., Adolfse, T., Albers, P.W., Amans, J.-P., Andersen, J.J., Andersen, M.I., Binetruy, P., Bristow, P., Castillo, R., Chemla, F., Christensen, L., Conconi, P., Conzelmann, R., Dam, J., de Caprio, V., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Delabre, B., di Marcantonio, P., Downing, M., Elswijk, E., Finger, G., Fischer, G., Flores, H., François, P., Goldoni, P., Guglielmi, L., Haigron, R., Hanenburg, H., Hendriks, I., Horrobin, M., Horville, D., Jessen, N.C., Kerber, F., Kern, L., Kiekebusch, M., Kleszcz, P., Klougart, J., Kragt, J., Larsen, H.H., Lizon, J.-L., Lucuix, C., Mainieri, V., Manuputy, R., Martayan, C., Mason, E., Mazzoleni, R., Michaelsen, N., Modigliani, A., Moehler, S., MĂžller, P., Norup SĂžrensen, A., NĂžrregaard, P., PĂ©roux, C., Patat, F., Pena, E., Pragt, J., Reinero, C., Rigal, F., Riva, M., Roelfsema, R., Royer, F., Sacco, G., Santin, P., Schoenmaker, T., Spano, P., Sweers, E., Ter Horst, R., Tintori, M., Tromp, N., van Dael, P., van der Vliet, H., Venema, L., Vidali, M., Vinther, J., Vola, P., Winters, R., Wistisen, D., Wulterkens, G., Zacchei, A.: X-shooter, the new wide band intermediate resolution spectrograph at the ESO Very Large Telescope. A&A 536, 105 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117752 arXiv:1110.1944 [astro-ph.IM]
- Goldoni et al. [2006] Goldoni, P., Royer, F., François, P., Horrobin, M., Blanc, G., Vernet, J., Modigliani, A., Larsen, J.: Data reduction software of the X-shooter spectrograph. In: McLean, I.S., Iye, M. (eds.) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 6269, p. 62692 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.669986
- Modigliani et al. [2010] Modigliani, A., Goldoni, P., Royer, F., Haigron, R., Guglielmi, L., François, P., Horrobin, M., Bristow, P., Vernet, J., Moehler, S., Kerber, F., Ballester, P., Mason, E., Christensen, L.: The X-shooter pipeline. In: Silva, D.R., Peck, A.B., Soifer, B.T. (eds.) Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 7737, p. 773728 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.857211
- Selsing et al. [2019] Selsing, J., Malesani, D., Goldoni, P., Fynbo, J.P.U., KrĂŒhler, T., Antonelli, L.A., Arabsalmani, M., Bolmer, J., Cano, Z., Christensen, L., Covino, S., DâAvanzo, P., DâElia, V., De Cia, A., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Flores, H., Friis, M., Gomboc, A., Greiner, J., Groot, P., Hammer, F., Hartoog, O.E., Heintz, K.E., Hjorth, J., Jakobsson, P., Japelj, J., Kann, D.A., Kaper, L., Ledoux, C., Leloudas, G., Levan, A.J., Maiorano, E., Melandri, A., Milvang-Jensen, B., Palazzi, E., Palmerio, J.T., Perley, D.A., Pian, E., Piranomonte, S., Pugliese, G., SĂĄnchez-RamĂrez, R., Savaglio, S., Schady, P., Schulze, S., Sollerman, J., Sparre, M., Tagliaferri, G., Tanvir, N.R., Thöne, C.C., Vergani, S.D., Vreeswijk, P., Watson, D., Wiersema, K., Wijers, R., Xu, D., Zafar, T.: The X-shooter GRB afterglow legacy sample (XS-GRB). A&A 623, 92 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832835 arXiv:1802.07727 [astro-ph.HE]
- Saccardi et al. [2024] Saccardi, A., Levan, A.J., Zhu, Z., Gompertz, B.P., Vergani, S.D., Pugliese, G., Xu, D., Malesani, D.B., Stargate Collaboration: X-ray transient EP240315a: VLT/X-shooter spectroscopic redshift of z = 4.859. GRB Coordinates Network 35936, 1 (2024)
- Cupani et al. [2020] Cupani, G., DâOdorico, V., Cristiani, S., Russo, S.A., Calderone, G., Taffoni, G.: Astrocook: your starred chef for spectral analysis. In: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 11452, p. 114521 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2561343
- Vielfaure et al. [2021] Vielfaure, J.-B., Vergani, S.D., Gronke, M., Japelj, J., Palmerio, J.T., Fynbo, J.P.U., Malesani, D.B., Milvang-Jensen, B., Salvaterra, R., Tanvir, N.R.: Gamma-ray bursts as probes of high-redshift Lyman- emitters and radiative transfer models. A&A 653, 83 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140355 arXiv:2105.09314 [astro-ph.GA]
- Krogager [2018] Krogager, J.-K.: VoigtFit: A Python package for Voigt profile fitting. arXiv e-prints, 1803â01187 (2018) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.01187 arXiv:1803.01187 [astro-ph.IM]
- van Dokkum [2001] van Dokkum, P.G.: Cosmic-Ray Rejection by Laplacian Edge Detection. PASP 113(789), 1420â1427 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/323894 arXiv:astro-ph/0108003 [astro-ph]
- Tody [1986] Tody, D.: The IRAF Data Reduction and Analysis System. In: Crawford, D.L. (ed.) Instrumentation in Astronomy VI. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 627, p. 733 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.968154
- Lang et al. [2010] Lang, D., Hogg, D.W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M., Roweis, S.: Astrometry.net: Blind Astrometric Calibration of Arbitrary Astronomical Images. AJ 139(5), 1782â1800 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782 arXiv:0910.2233 [astro-ph.IM]
- Seifert et al. [2003] Seifert, W., Appenzeller, I., Baumeister, H., Bizenberger, P., Bomans, D., Dettmar, R.-J., Grimm, B., Herbst, T., Hofmann, R., Juette, M., Laun, W., Lehmitz, M., Lemke, R., Lenzen, R., Mandel, H., Polsterer, K., Rohloff, R.-R., Schuetze, A., Seltmann, A., Thatte, N.A., Weiser, P., Xu, W.: LUCIFER: a Multi-Mode NIR Instrument for the LBT. In: Iye, M., Moorwood, A.F.M. (eds.) Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 4841, pp. 962â973 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.459494
- Fontana et al. [2014] Fontana, A., Dunlop, J.S., Paris, D., Targett, T.A., Boutsia, K., Castellano, M., Galametz, A., Grazian, A., McLure, R., Merlin, E., Pentericci, L., Wuyts, S., Almaini, O., Caputi, K., Chary, R.-R., Cirasuolo, M., Conselice, C.J., Cooray, A., Daddi, E., Dickinson, M., Faber, S.M., Fazio, G., Ferguson, H.C., Giallongo, E., Giavalisco, M., Grogin, N.A., Hathi, N., Koekemoer, A.M., Koo, D.C., Lucas, R.A., Nonino, M., Rix, H.W., Renzini, A., Rosario, D., Santini, P., Scarlata, C., Sommariva, V., Stark, D.P., van der Wel, A., Vanzella, E., Wild, V., Yan, H., Zibetti, S.: The Hawk-I UDS and GOODS Survey (HUGS): Survey design and deep K-band number counts. A&A 570, 11 (2014) https://doi.org/%****âŁclr-sn-article.bblâŁLineâŁ2775âŁ****10.1051/0004-6361/201423543 arXiv:1409.7082 [astro-ph.GA]
- Nasa High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (Heasarc) [2014] Nasa High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (Heasarc): HEAsoft: Unified Release of FTOOLS and XANADU. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1408.004 (2014)
- Willingale et al. [2013] Willingale, R., Starling, R.L.C., Beardmore, A.P., Tanvir, N.R., OâBrien, P.T.: Calibration of X-ray absorption in our Galaxy. MNRAS 431(1), 394â404 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt175 arXiv:1303.0843 [astro-ph.HE]
- Wilms et al. [2000] Wilms, J., Allen, A., McCray, R.: On the Absorption of X-Rays in the Interstellar Medium. ApJ 542(2), 914â924 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1086/317016 arXiv:astro-ph/0008425 [astro-ph]
- Cash [1979] Cash, W.: Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio. ApJ 228, 939â947 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1086/156922
- Kraft et al. [1991] Kraft, R.P., Burrows, D.N., Nousek, J.A.: Determination of Confidence Limits for Experiments with Low Numbers of Counts. ApJ 374, 344 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1086/170124
- Heise et al. [2001] Heise, J., Zand, J.I., Kippen, R.M., Woods, P.M.: X-Ray Flashes and X-Ray Rich Gamma Ray Bursts. In: Costa, E., Frontera, F., Hjorth, J. (eds.) Gamma-ray Bursts in the Afterglow Era, p. 16 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/10853853_4
- DâAlessio et al. [2006] DâAlessio, V., Piro, L., Rossi, E.M.: Properties of X-ray rich gamma ray bursts and X-ray flashes detected with BeppoSAX and Hete-2. A&A 460(3), 653â664 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054501 arXiv:astro-ph/0511272 [astro-ph]
- Evans et al. [2010] Evans, P.A., Willingale, R., Osborne, J.P., OâBrien, P.T., Page, K.L., Markwardt, C.B., Barthelmy, S.D., Beardmore, A.P., Burrows, D.N., Pagani, C., Starling, R.L.C., Gehrels, N., Romano, P.: The Swift Burst Analyser. I. BAT and XRT spectral and flux evolution of gamma ray bursts. A&A 519, 102 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014819 arXiv:1004.3208 [astro-ph.IM]
- Brown et al. [2015] Brown, G.C., Levan, A.J., Stanway, E.R., Tanvir, N.R., Cenko, S.B., Berger, E., Chornock, R., Cucchiaria, A.: Swift J1112.2-8238: a candidate relativistic tidal disruption flare. MNRAS 452(4), 4297â4306 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1520 arXiv:1507.03582 [astro-ph.HE]
- Bloom et al. [2011] Bloom, J.S., Giannios, D., Metzger, B.D., Cenko, S.B., Perley, D.A., Butler, N.R., Tanvir, N.R., Levan, A.J., OâBrien, P.T., Strubbe, L.E., De Colle, F., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Lee, W.H., Nayakshin, S., Quataert, E., King, A.R., Cucchiara, A., Guillochon, J., Bower, G.C., Fruchter, A.S., Morgan, A.N., van der Horst, A.J.: A Possible Relativistic Jetted Outburst from a Massive Black Hole Fed by a Tidally Disrupted Star. Science 333(6039), 203 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207150 arXiv:1104.3257 [astro-ph.HE]
- Burrows et al. [2011] Burrows, D.N., Kennea, J.A., Ghisellini, G., Mangano, V., Zhang, B., Page, K.L., Eracleous, M., Romano, P., Sakamoto, T., Falcone, A.D., Osborne, J.P., Campana, S., Beardmore, A.P., Breeveld, A.A., Chester, M.M., Corbet, R., Covino, S., Cummings, J.R., DâAvanzo, P., DâElia, V., Esposito, P., Evans, P.A., Fugazza, D., Gelbord, J.M., Hiroi, K., Holland, S.T., Huang, K.Y., Im, M., Israel, G., Jeon, Y., Jeon, Y.-B., Jun, H.D., Kawai, N., Kim, J.H., Krimm, H.A., Marshall, F.E., P. MĂ©szĂĄros, Negoro, H., Omodei, N., Park, W.-K., Perkins, J.S., Sugizaki, M., Sung, H.-I., Tagliaferri, G., Troja, E., Ueda, Y., Urata, Y., Usui, R., Antonelli, L.A., Barthelmy, S.D., Cusumano, G., Giommi, P., Melandri, A., Perri, M., Racusin, J.L., Sbarufatti, B., Siegel, M.H., Gehrels, N.: Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole. Nature 476(7361), 421â424 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10374 arXiv:1104.4787 [astro-ph.HE]
- Levan et al. [2016] Levan, A.J., Tanvir, N.R., Brown, G.C., Metzger, B.D., Page, K.L., Cenko, S.B., OâBrien, P.T., Lyman, J.D., Wiersema, K., Stanway, E.R., Fruchter, A.S., Perley, D.A., Bloom, J.S.: Late Time Multi-wavelength Observations of Swift J1644+5734: A Luminous Optical/IR Bump and Quiescent X-Ray Emission. ApJ 819(1), 51 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/51 arXiv:1509.08945 [astro-ph.HE]
- Mangano et al. [2016] Mangano, V., Burrows, D.N., Sbarufatti, B., Cannizzo, J.K.: The Definitive X-Ray Light Curve of Swift J164449.3+573451. ApJ 817(2), 103 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/103 arXiv:1511.06447 [astro-ph.HE]
- Cenko et al. [2012] Cenko, S.B., Krimm, H.A., Horesh, A., Rau, A., Frail, D.A., Kennea, J.A., Levan, A.J., Holland, S.T., Butler, N.R., Quimby, R.M., Bloom, J.S., Filippenko, A.V., Gal-Yam, A., Greiner, J., Kulkarni, S.R., Ofek, E.O., Olivares E., F., Schady, P., Silverman, J.M., Tanvir, N.R., Xu, D.: Swift J2058.4+0516: Discovery of a Possible Second Relativistic Tidal Disruption Flare? ApJ 753(1), 77 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/77 arXiv:1107.5307 [astro-ph.HE]
- Pasham et al. [2015] Pasham, D.R., Cenko, S.B., Levan, A.J., Bower, G.C., Horesh, A., Brown, G.C., Dolan, S., Wiersema, K., Filippenko, A.V., Fruchter, A.S., Greiner, J., OâBrien, P.T., Page, K.L., Rau, A., Tanvir, N.R.: A Multiwavelength Study of the Relativistic Tidal Disruption Candidate Swift J2058.4+0516 at Late Times. ApJ 805(1), 68 (2015) https://doi.org/%****âŁclr-sn-article.bblâŁLineâŁ3150âŁ****10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/68 arXiv:1502.01345 [astro-ph.HE]
- Andreoni et al. [2022] Andreoni, I., Coughlin, M.W., Perley, D.A., Yao, Y., Lu, W., Cenko, S.B., Kumar, H., Anand, S., Ho, A.Y.Q., Kasliwal, M.M., de Ugarte Postigo, A., SaguĂ©s-Carracedo, A., Schulze, S., Kann, D.A., Kulkarni, S.R., Sollerman, J., Tanvir, N., Rest, A., Izzo, L., Somalwar, J.J., Kaplan, D.L., Ahumada, T., Anupama, G.C., Auchettl, K., Barway, S., Bellm, E.C., Bhalerao, V., Bloom, J.S., Bremer, M., Bulla, M., Burns, E., Campana, S., Chandra, P., Charalampopoulos, P., Cooke, J., DâElia, V., Das, K.K., Dobie, D., AgĂŒĂ FernĂĄndez, J.F., Freeburn, J., Fremling, C., Gezari, S., Goode, S., Graham, M.J., Hammerstein, E., Karambelkar, V.R., Kilpatrick, C.D., Kool, E.C., Krips, M., Laher, R.R., Leloudas, G., Levan, A., Lundquist, M.J., Mahabal, A.A., Medford, M.S., Miller, M.C., Möller, A., Mooley, K.P., Nayana, A.J., Nir, G., Pang, P.T.H., Paraskeva, E., Perley, R.A., Petitpas, G., Pursiainen, M., Ravi, V., Ridden-Harper, R., Riddle, R., Rigault, M., Rodriguez, A.C., Rusholme, B., Sharma, Y., Smith, I.A., Stein, R.D., Thöne, C., Tohuvavohu, A., Valdes, F., van Roestel, J., Vergani, S.D., Wang, Q., Zhang, J.: A very luminous jet from the disruption of a star by a massive black hole. Nature 612(7940), 430â434 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8 arXiv:2211.16530 [astro-ph.HE]
- Pasham et al. [2023] Pasham, D.R., Lucchini, M., Laskar, T., Gompertz, B.P., Srivastav, S., Nicholl, M., Smartt, S.J., Miller-Jones, J.C.A., Alexander, K.D., Fender, R., Smith, G.P., Fulton, M., Dewangan, G., Gendreau, K., Coughlin, E.R., Rhodes, L., Horesh, A., van Velzen, S., Sfaradi, I., Guolo, M., Castro Segura, N., Aamer, A., Anderson, J.P., Arcavi, I., Brennan, S.J., Chambers, K., Charalampopoulos, P., Chen, T.-W., Clocchiatti, A., de Boer, T., Dennefeld, M., Ferrara, E., Galbany, L., Gao, H., Gillanders, J.H., Goodwin, A., Gromadzki, M., Huber, M., Jonker, P.G., Joshi, M., Kara, E., Killestein, T.L., Kosec, P., Kocevski, D., Leloudas, G., Lin, C.-C., Margutti, R., Mattila, S., Moore, T., MĂŒller-Bravo, T., Ngeow, C.-C., Oates, S., Onori, F., Pan, Y.-C., Perez-Torres, M., Rani, P., Remillard, R., Ridley, E.J., Schulze, S., Sheng, X., Shingles, L., Smith, K.W., Steiner, J.F., Wainscoat, R., Wevers, T., Yang, S.: The Birth of a Relativistic Jet Following the Disruption of a Star by a Cosmological Black Hole. Nature Astronomy 7, 88â104 (2023) https://doi.org/%****âŁclr-sn-article.bblâŁLineâŁ3325âŁ****10.1038/s41550-022-01820-x arXiv:2211.16537 [astro-ph.HE]
- Evans et al. [2007] Evans, P.A., Beardmore, A.P., Page, K.L., Tyler, L.G., Osborne, J.P., Goad, M.R., OâBrien, P.T., Vetere, L., Racusin, J., Morris, D., Burrows, D.N., Capalbi, M., Perri, M., Gehrels, N., Romano, P.: An online repository of Swift/XRT light curves of -ray bursts. A&A 469(1), 379â385 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077530 arXiv:0704.0128 [astro-ph]
- Evans et al. [2009] Evans, P.A., Beardmore, A.P., Page, K.L., Osborne, J.P., OâBrien, P.T., Willingale, R., Starling, R.L.C., Burrows, D.N., Godet, O., Vetere, L., Racusin, J., Goad, M.R., Wiersema, K., Angelini, L., Capalbi, M., Chincarini, G., Gehrels, N., Kennea, J.A., Margutti, R., Morris, D.C., Mountford, C.J., Pagani, C., Perri, M., Romano, P., Tanvir, N.: Methods and results of an automatic analysis of a complete sample of Swift-XRT observations of GRBs. MNRAS 397(3), 1177â1201 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14913.x arXiv:0812.3662 [astro-ph]
- Schulze et al. [2014] Schulze, S., Malesani, D., Cucchiara, A., Tanvir, N.R., KrĂŒhler, T., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Leloudas, G., Lyman, J., Bersier, D., Wiersema, K., Perley, D.A., Schady, P., Gorosabel, J., Anderson, J.P., Castro-Tirado, A.J., Cenko, S.B., De Cia, A., Ellerbroek, L.E., Fynbo, J.P.U., Greiner, J., Hjorth, J., Kann, D.A., Kaper, L., Klose, S., Levan, A.J., MartĂn, S., OâBrien, P.T., Page, K.L., Pignata, G., Rapaport, S., SĂĄnchez-RamĂrez, R., Sollerman, J., Smith, I.A., Sparre, M., Thöne, C.C., Watson, D.J., Xu, D., Bauer, F.E., Bayliss, M., Björnsson, G., Bremer, M., Cano, Z., Covino, S., DâElia, V., Frail, D.A., Geier, S., Goldoni, P., Hartoog, O.E., Jakobsson, P., Korhonen, H., Lee, K.Y., Milvang-Jensen, B., Nardini, M., Nicuesa Guelbenzu, A., Oguri, M., Pandey, S.B., Petitpas, G., Rossi, A., Sandberg, A., Schmidl, S., Tagliaferri, G., Tilanus, R.P.J., Winters, J.M., Wright, D., Wuyts, E.: GRB 120422A/SN 2012bz: Bridging the gap between low- and high-luminosity gamma-ray bursts. A&A 566, 102 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423387 arXiv:1401.3774 [astro-ph.HE]
- Zhang et al. [2014] Zhang, B.-B., Zhang, B., Murase, K., Connaughton, V., Briggs, M.S.: How Long does a Burst Burst? ApJ 787(1), 66 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/66 arXiv:1310.2540 [astro-ph.HE]
- Ghirlanda and Salvaterra [2022] Ghirlanda, G., Salvaterra, R.: The Cosmic History of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts. ApJ 932(1), 10 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac6e43
- Fruchter et al. [2006] Fruchter, A.S., Levan, A.J., Strolger, L., Vreeswijk, P.M., Thorsett, S.E., Bersier, D., Burud, I., Castro CerĂłn, J.M., Castro-Tirado, A.J., Conselice, C., Dahlen, T., Ferguson, H.C., Fynbo, J.P.U., Garnavich, P.M., Gibbons, R.A., Gorosabel, J., Gull, T.R., Hjorth, J., Holland, S.T., Kouveliotou, C., Levay, Z., Livio, M., Metzger, M.R., Nugent, P.E., Petro, L., Pian, E., Rhoads, J.E., Riess, A.G., Sahu, K.C., Smette, A., Tanvir, N.R., Wijers, R.A.M.J., Woosley, S.E.: Long -ray bursts and core-collapse supernovae have different environments. Nature 441(7092), 463â468 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04787 arXiv:astro-ph/0603537 [astro-ph]
- KrĂŒhler et al. [2015] KrĂŒhler, T., Malesani, D., Fynbo, J.P.U., Hartoog, O.E., Hjorth, J., Jakobsson, P., Perley, D.A., Rossi, A., Schady, P., Schulze, S., Tanvir, N.R., Vergani, S.D., Wiersema, K., Afonso, P.M.J., Bolmer, J., Cano, Z., Covino, S., DâElia, V., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Filgas, R., Friis, M., Graham, J.F., Greiner, J., Goldoni, P., Gomboc, A., Hammer, F., Japelj, J., Kann, D.A., Kaper, L., Klose, S., Levan, A.J., Leloudas, G., Milvang-Jensen, B., Nicuesa Guelbenzu, A., Palazzi, E., Pian, E., Piranomonte, S., SĂĄnchez-RamĂrez, R., Savaglio, S., Selsing, J., Tagliaferri, G., Vreeswijk, P.M., Watson, D.J., Xu, D.: GRB hosts through cosmic time. VLT/X-Shooter emission-line spectroscopy of 96 -ray-burst-selected galaxies at 0.1 ÂĄz ÂĄ 3.6. A&A 581, 125 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425561 arXiv:1505.06743 [astro-ph.GA]
- Hjorth et al. [2012] Hjorth, J., Malesani, D., Jakobsson, P., Jaunsen, A.O., Fynbo, J.P.U., Gorosabel, J., KrĂŒhler, T., Levan, A.J., MichaĆowski, M.J., Milvang-Jensen, B., MĂžller, P., Schulze, S., Tanvir, N.R., Watson, D.: The Optically Unbiased Gamma-Ray Burst Host (TOUGH) Survey. I. Survey Design and Catalogs. ApJ 756(2), 187 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/187 arXiv:1205.3162 [astro-ph.CO]
- Perley et al. [2016] Perley, D.A., Tanvir, N.R., Hjorth, J., Laskar, T., Berger, E., Chary, R., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Fynbo, J.P.U., KrĂŒhler, T., Levan, A.J., MichaĆowski, M.J., Schulze, S.: The Swift GRB Host Galaxy Legacy Survey. II. Rest-frame Near-IR Luminosity Distribution and Evidence for a Near-solar Metallicity Threshold. ApJ 817(1), 8 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/8 arXiv:1504.02479 [astro-ph.GA]
- Eappachen et al. [2022] Eappachen, D., Jonker, P.G., Fraser, M., Torres, M.A.P., Dhillon, V.S., Marsh, T., Littlefair, S.P., Quirola-VĂĄsquez, J., Maguire, K., Mata SĂĄnchez, D., Cannizzaro, G., Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z., Wevers, T., Onori, F., Inkenhaag, A., Brennan, S.J.: Probing for the host galaxies of the fast X-ray transients XRT 000519 and XRT 110103. MNRAS 514(1), 302â312 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1194 arXiv:2204.10012 [astro-ph.HE]
- Eappachen et al. [2023] Eappachen, D., Jonker, P.G., Levan, A.J., Quirola-Våsquez, J., Torres, M.A.P., Bauer, F.E., Dhillon, V.S., Marsh, T., Littlefair, S.P., Ravasio, M.E., Fraser, M.: The Fast X-Ray Transient XRT 210423 and Its Host Galaxy. ApJ 948(2), 91 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc184 arXiv:2303.01857 [astro-ph.HE]