Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:2106.01812

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Audio and Speech Processing

arXiv:2106.01812 (eess)
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2021]

Title:An objective evaluation of the effects of recording conditions and speaker characteristics in multi-speaker deep neural speech synthesis

Authors:Beata Lorincz, Adriana Stan, Mircea Giurgiu
View a PDF of the paper titled An objective evaluation of the effects of recording conditions and speaker characteristics in multi-speaker deep neural speech synthesis, by Beata Lorincz and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Multi-speaker spoken datasets enable the creation of text-to-speech synthesis (TTS) systems which can output several voice identities. The multi-speaker (MSPK) scenario also enables the use of fewer training samples per speaker. However, in the resulting acoustic model, not all speakers exhibit the same synthetic quality, and some of the voice identities cannot be used at all.
In this paper we evaluate the influence of the recording conditions, speaker gender, and speaker particularities over the quality of the synthesised output of a deep neural TTS architecture, namely Tacotron2. The evaluation is possible due to the use of a large Romanian parallel spoken corpus containing over 81 hours of data. Within this setup, we also evaluate the influence of different types of text representations: orthographic, phonetic, and phonetic extended with syllable boundaries and lexical stress markings.
We evaluate the results of the MSPK system using the objective measures of equal error rate (EER) and word error rate (WER), and also look into the distances between natural and synthesised t-SNE projections of the embeddings computed by an accurate speaker verification network. The results show that there is indeed a large correlation between the recording conditions and the speaker's synthetic voice quality. The speaker gender does not influence the output, and that extending the input text representation with syllable boundaries and lexical stress information does not equally enhance the generated audio across all speaker identities. The visualisation of the t-SNE projections of the natural and synthesised speaker embeddings show that the acoustic model shifts some of the speakers' neural representation, but not all of them. As a result, these speakers have lower performances of the output speech.
Comments: Accepted at 25th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems (KES 2021)
Subjects: Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS); Sound (cs.SD)
Cite as: arXiv:2106.01812 [eess.AS]
  (or arXiv:2106.01812v1 [eess.AS] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.01812
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Adriana Stan PhD [view email]
[v1] Thu, 3 Jun 2021 13:04:59 UTC (2,798 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled An objective evaluation of the effects of recording conditions and speaker characteristics in multi-speaker deep neural speech synthesis, by Beata Lorincz and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
eess.AS
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SD
eess

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack