Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1711.05667

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms

arXiv:1711.05667 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Nov 2017 (v1), last revised 11 Jun 2019 (this version, v4)]

Title:A Friendly Smoothed Analysis of the Simplex Method

Authors:Daniel Dadush, Sophie Huiberts
View a PDF of the paper titled A Friendly Smoothed Analysis of the Simplex Method, by Daniel Dadush and Sophie Huiberts
View PDF
Abstract:Explaining the excellent practical performance of the simplex method for linear programming has been a major topic of research for over 50 years. One of the most successful frameworks for understanding the simplex method was given by Spielman and Teng (JACM `04), who developed the notion of smoothed analysis. Starting from an arbitrary linear program with $d$ variables and $n$ constraints, Spielman and Teng analyzed the expected runtime over random perturbations of the LP (smoothed LP), where variance $\sigma^2$ Gaussian noise is added to the LP data. In particular, they gave a two-stage shadow vertex simplex algorithm which uses an expected $\widetilde{O}(d^{55} n^{86} \sigma^{-30})$ number of simplex pivots to solve the smoothed LP. Their analysis and runtime was substantially improved by Deshpande and Spielman (FOCS `05) and later Vershynin (SICOMP `09). The fastest current algorithm, due to Vershynin, solves the smoothed LP using an expected $O(d^3 \sigma^{-4} \log^3 n + d^9\log^7 n)$ number of pivots, improving the dependence on $n$ from polynomial to poly-logarithmic.
While the original proof of Spielman and Teng has now been substantially simplified, the resulting analyses are still quite long and complex and the parameter dependencies far from optimal. In this work, we make substantial progress on this front, providing an improved and simpler analysis of shadow simplex methods, where our algorithm requires an expected \[ O(d^2 \sqrt{\log n} \sigma^{-2} + d^3 \log^{3/2} n) \] number of simplex pivots. We obtain our results via an improved \emph{shadow bound}, key to earlier analyses as well, combined with improvements on algorithmic techniques of Vershynin. As an added bonus, our analysis is completely modular, allowing us to obtain non-trivial bounds for perturbations beyond Gaussians, such as Laplace perturbations.
Comments: Revision 4: an improved algorithm to strengthen the complexity bound in the large-noise regime
Subjects: Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
MSC classes: 52B99, 68Q87, 68W40
Cite as: arXiv:1711.05667 [cs.DS]
  (or arXiv:1711.05667v4 [cs.DS] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.05667
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Sophie Huiberts [view email]
[v1] Wed, 15 Nov 2017 17:04:52 UTC (157 KB)
[v2] Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:10:02 UTC (157 KB)
[v3] Sun, 22 Jul 2018 11:17:22 UTC (216 KB)
[v4] Tue, 11 Jun 2019 17:42:20 UTC (222 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Friendly Smoothed Analysis of the Simplex Method, by Daniel Dadush and Sophie Huiberts
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DS
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-11
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

1 blog link

(what is this?)

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Daniel Dadush
Sophie Huiberts
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack