Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1709.09135 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 26 Sep 2017 (v1), last revised 14 Dec 2017 (this version, v2)]

Title:A comparison of Einstein-Boltzmann solvers for testing General Relativity

Authors:E. Bellini, A. Barreira, N. Frusciante, B. Hu, S. Peirone, M. Raveri, M. Zumalacárregui, A. Avilez-Lopez, M. Ballardini, R. A. Battye, B. Bolliet, E. Calabrese, Y. Dirian, P. G. Ferreira, F. Finelli, Z. Huang, M. M. Ivanov, J. Lesgourgues, B. Li, N. A. Lima, F. Pace, D. Paoletti, I. Sawicki, A. Silvestri, C. Skordis, C. Umiltà, F. Vernizzi
View PDF
Abstract:We compare Einstein-Boltzmann solvers that include modifications to General Relativity and find that, for a wide range of models and parameters, they agree to a high level of precision. We look at three general purpose codes that primarily model general scalar-tensor theories, three codes that model Jordan-Brans-Dicke (JBD) gravity, a code that models f(R) gravity, a code that models covariant Galileons, a code that models Hořava-Lifschitz gravity and two codes that model non-local models of gravity. Comparing predictions of the angular power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background and the power spectrum of dark matter for a suite of different models, we find agreement at the sub-percent level. This means that this suite of Einstein-Boltzmann solvers is now sufficiently accurate for precision constraints on cosmological and gravitational parameters.
Comments: 23 pages; 11 figures. Matches version accepted in PRD
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Report number: NORDITA 2017-098
Cite as: arXiv:1709.09135 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1709.09135v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.09135
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. D 97, 023520 (2018)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.023520

Submission history

From: Emilio Bellini [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:13:01 UTC (6,646 KB)
[v2] Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:14:14 UTC (6,648 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-09
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)