Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Mathematics > Logic

arXiv:1109.5526 (math)
[Submitted on 26 Sep 2011 (v1), last revised 16 Oct 2011 (this version, v2)]

Title:Are random axioms useful?

Authors:Alexander Shen
View PDF
Abstract:The famous Gödel incompleteness theorem says that for every sufficiently rich formal theory (containing formal arithmetic in some natural sense) there exist true unprovable statements. Such statements would be natural candidates for being added as axioms, but where can we obtain them? One classical (and well studied) approach is to add (to some theory T) an axiom that claims the consistency of T. In this note we discuss the other one (motivated by Chaitin's version of the Gödel theorem) and show that it is not really useful (in the sense that it does not help us to prove new interesting theorems), at least if we are not limiting the proof complexity. We discuss also some related questions.
Subjects: Logic (math.LO); Information Theory (cs.IT); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
MSC classes: 03F99
ACM classes: F.4.1
Cite as: arXiv:1109.5526 [math.LO]
  (or arXiv:1109.5526v2 [math.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1109.5526

Submission history

From: Alexander Shen [view email]
[v1] Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:35:14 UTC (7 KB)
[v2] Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:48:36 UTC (8 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
math.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2011-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.IT
cs.LO
math
math.IT

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)