You are in: Entertainment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, 20 September, 2001, 11:47 GMT 12:47 UK
Funding the UK film industry
Eariler this year, the UK film industry basked in the success of Bridget Jones's Diary, which had Britain's most successful movie opening in April.
It was shot in Britain, produced by the UK's Working Title Films, and was distributed by two major US studios - Miramax and Universal.
Other UK films have also done well commercially in the US, including Oscar-nominated Billy Elliot, Notting Hill, The Full Monty, Four Weddings and a Funeral and Trainspotting. They all also had US distributors. And the UK film industry has continued to build on this - last year's film production was up by a third, thanks to movies such as Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, 51st State and Tomb Raider. But for every British film achievement, there are plenty that do not break even financially, and do not find their way into foreign film markets.
To secure distribution in cinemas in Britain and abroad, they have to convince distribution companies - of which the biggest are all controlled by US studios - that their films are worth showing. But even when they succeed and the films make money, a lot of the profit goes to the distributors, with no guarantee that it will be reinvested in British film. Last year, former Culture Secretary Chris Smith set out to address this by setting up the Film Council, which is funded by the National Lottery and the Treasury.
Two clear aims stand out - to develop a sustainable UK film industry, and to encourage film culture by improving access to, and education about the moving image. The council hopes to achieve its goals through distributing funds to film-makers and by offering training to those working in the industry. Between 2001 and 2002, the council has �57m at its disposal, with �20.8m from government grant-in-aid, and �36.2m from the lottery.
The council's spokesman, Ian Thomson, said part of the problem with the industry was that UK film-makers tend to "shy away" from commercialism. But he was quick to point out that getting US distribution did not necessarily make or break a film - there are many film territories worldwide where UK movies could be shown. He also stressed that if a film was not an instant financial success, it did not automatically mean it was a failure, despite recent media reports slating movies funded by lottery money.
"It is not just about the box office - some films are much more popular in the video and DVD market, and that is where they make their money." But the government is using more than the Film Council to try to boost the UK film industry. Chancellor Gordon Brown's March Budget announced that tax relief for film production in the UK will be extended until April 2005.
And in 1997, Chris Smith announced that three "mini-studios" funded by �92m would produce a total of 90 films by the year 2003. The moves have so far produced a significant rise in the number of films being created. It now remains to be seen as to whether they recoup the money invested in them.
|
See also:
18 Sep 01 | Entertainment
07 Mar 01 | Budget 2001
17 Apr 01 | Entertainment
23 Apr 01 | Entertainment
23 Jan 01 | Entertainment
15 Mar 01 | Entertainment
01 Oct 00 | Entertainment
03 Jan 01 | Entertainment
01 Apr 01 | Entertainment
22 Mar 99 | e-cyclopedia
12 Mar 01 | Entertainment
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Entertainment stories now:
Links to more Entertainment stories are at the foot of the page.
|
E-mail this story to a friend |
Links to more Entertainment stories |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> | To BBC World Service>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |