summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBruce Momjian2008-12-10 11:05:49 +0000
committerBruce Momjian2008-12-10 11:05:49 +0000
commit19219ca0c65ab76a97c923422d62c18c7a86d46f (patch)
tree3944b552ec8914de66f9e45cfadd5f94acada180
parentf767f737e4e1697f5f6840ae33b57de94ce955a8 (diff)
Update journaling performance docs based on comments by Michael Renner.
-rw-r--r--doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml14
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
index 7ae6c053d7..15cd5baec3 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
@@ -139,13 +139,13 @@
<para>
Because <acronym>WAL</acronym> restores database file
contents after a crash, it is not necessary to use a
- journaled filesystem; in fact, journaling overhead can
- reduce performance. For best performance, turn off
- <emphasis>data</emphasis> journaling as a filesystem mount
- option, e.g. use <literal>data=writeback</> on Linux.
- Meta-data journaling (e.g. file creation and directory
- modification) is still desirable for faster rebooting after
- a crash.
+ journaled filesystem for reliability. In fact, journaling
+ overhead can reduce performance, especially if journaling
+ causes file system <emphasis>data</emphasis> to be flushed
+ to disk. Fortunately, data flushing during journaling can
+ often be disabled with a filesystem mount option, e.g.
+ <literal>data=writeback</> on a Linux ext3 file system.
+ Journaled file systems do improve boot speed after a crash.
</para>
</tip>