diff options
author | Tom Lane | 2011-10-26 17:19:42 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane | 2011-10-26 17:19:42 +0000 |
commit | 1e3b21dd5e1070d301153690c1751bef74f03fa4 (patch) | |
tree | 85d6ede0a5ac8c3b6eea9285de474a0454ee4c3f | |
parent | 58958726ffaec8d1a5d6a63f648443886fde8a21 (diff) |
Change FK trigger naming convention to fix self-referential FKs.
Use names like "RI_ConstraintTrigger_a_NNNN" for FK action triggers and
"RI_ConstraintTrigger_c_NNNN" for FK check triggers. This ensures the
action trigger fires first in self-referential cases where the very same
row update fires both an action and a check trigger. This change provides
a non-probabilistic solution for bug #6268, at the risk that it could break
client code that is making assumptions about the exact names assigned to
auto-generated FK triggers. Hence, change this in HEAD only. No need for
forced initdb since old triggers continue to work fine.
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c index f82157b62c..c4622c0412 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c @@ -6467,8 +6467,17 @@ CreateFKCheckTrigger(RangeVar *myRel, Constraint *fkconstraint, { CreateTrigStmt *fk_trigger; + /* + * Note: for a self-referential FK (referencing and referenced tables are + * the same), it is important that the ON UPDATE action fires before the + * CHECK action, since both triggers will fire on the same row during an + * UPDATE event; otherwise the CHECK trigger will be checking a non-final + * state of the row. Triggers fire in name order, so we ensure this by + * using names like "RI_ConstraintTrigger_a_NNNN" for the action triggers + * and "RI_ConstraintTrigger_c_NNNN" for the check triggers. + */ fk_trigger = makeNode(CreateTrigStmt); - fk_trigger->trigname = "RI_ConstraintTrigger"; + fk_trigger->trigname = "RI_ConstraintTrigger_c"; fk_trigger->relation = myRel; fk_trigger->row = true; fk_trigger->timing = TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER; @@ -6524,7 +6533,7 @@ createForeignKeyTriggers(Relation rel, Constraint *fkconstraint, * DELETE action on the referenced table. */ fk_trigger = makeNode(CreateTrigStmt); - fk_trigger->trigname = "RI_ConstraintTrigger"; + fk_trigger->trigname = "RI_ConstraintTrigger_a"; fk_trigger->relation = fkconstraint->pktable; fk_trigger->row = true; fk_trigger->timing = TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER; @@ -6577,7 +6586,7 @@ createForeignKeyTriggers(Relation rel, Constraint *fkconstraint, * UPDATE action on the referenced table. */ fk_trigger = makeNode(CreateTrigStmt); - fk_trigger->trigname = "RI_ConstraintTrigger"; + fk_trigger->trigname = "RI_ConstraintTrigger_a"; fk_trigger->relation = fkconstraint->pktable; fk_trigger->row = true; fk_trigger->timing = TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER; @@ -6628,17 +6637,6 @@ createForeignKeyTriggers(Relation rel, Constraint *fkconstraint, /* * Build and execute CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER statements for the CHECK * action for both INSERTs and UPDATEs on the referencing table. - * - * Note: for a self-referential FK (referencing and referenced tables are - * the same), it is important that the ON UPDATE action fires before the - * CHECK action, since both triggers will fire on the same row during an - * UPDATE event; otherwise the CHECK trigger will be checking a non-final - * state of the row. Because triggers fire in name order, we are - * effectively relying on the OIDs of the triggers to sort correctly as - * text. This will work except when the OID counter wraps around or adds - * a digit, eg "99999" sorts after "100000". That is infrequent enough, - * and the use of self-referential FKs is rare enough, that we live with - * it for now. There will be a real fix in PG 9.2. */ CreateFKCheckTrigger(myRel, fkconstraint, constraintOid, indexOid, true); CreateFKCheckTrigger(myRel, fkconstraint, constraintOid, indexOid, false); |