diff options
| author | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-06-12 12:19:52 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-06-12 12:19:52 +0000 |
| commit | b5d099f82ae6e7c49c397bd85832f13729626035 (patch) | |
| tree | 4a4ef49d58d1cacad343e73cd2c359a11a2f96fc | |
| parent | 8f6c94272c485bb812aebe063fc412326a17b880 (diff) | |
doc: Replace non-ASCII lines in psql example output
We normally use the default line mode in examples.
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/src/sgml/jit.sgml | 44 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/jit.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/jit.sgml index 6a712ff7c2e..1abec1ef42b 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/jit.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/jit.sgml @@ -151,14 +151,12 @@ is not using <acronym>JIT</acronym>: <screen> =# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT SUM(relpages) FROM pg_class; -┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ -│ QUERY PLAN │ -├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ -│ Aggregate (cost=16.27..16.29 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.303..0.303 rows=1 loops=1) │ -│ -> Seq Scan on pg_class (cost=0.00..15.42 rows=342 width=4) (actual time=0.017..0.111 rows=356 loops=1) │ -│ Planning Time: 0.116 ms │ -│ Execution Time: 0.365 ms │ -└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate (cost=16.27..16.29 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.303..0.303 rows=1 loops=1) + -> Seq Scan on pg_class (cost=0.00..15.42 rows=342 width=4) (actual time=0.017..0.111 rows=356 loops=1) + Planning Time: 0.116 ms + Execution Time: 0.365 ms (4 rows) </screen> Given the cost of the plan, it is entirely reasonable that no @@ -169,22 +167,20 @@ =# SET jit_above_cost = 10; SET =# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT SUM(relpages) FROM pg_class; -┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ -│ QUERY PLAN │ -├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ -│ Aggregate (cost=16.27..16.29 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=6.049..6.049 rows=1 loops=1) │ -│ -> Seq Scan on pg_class (cost=0.00..15.42 rows=342 width=4) (actual time=0.019..0.052 rows=356 loops=1) │ -│ Planning Time: 0.133 ms │ -│ JIT: │ -│ Functions: 3 │ -│ Generation Time: 1.259 ms │ -│ Inlining: false │ -│ Inlining Time: 0.000 ms │ -│ Optimization: false │ -│ Optimization Time: 0.797 ms │ -│ Emission Time: 5.048 ms │ -│ Execution Time: 7.416 ms │ -└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate (cost=16.27..16.29 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=6.049..6.049 rows=1 loops=1) + -> Seq Scan on pg_class (cost=0.00..15.42 rows=342 width=4) (actual time=0.019..0.052 rows=356 loops=1) + Planning Time: 0.133 ms + JIT: + Functions: 3 + Generation Time: 1.259 ms + Inlining: false + Inlining Time: 0.000 ms + Optimization: false + Optimization Time: 0.797 ms + Emission Time: 5.048 ms + Execution Time: 7.416 ms </screen> As visible here, <acronym>JIT</acronym> was used, but inlining and expensive optimization were not. If <xref |