diff options
| author | Etsuro Fujita | 2022-09-22 06:55:00 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Etsuro Fujita | 2022-09-22 06:55:00 +0000 |
| commit | cbe6dd17ac453fece214b2a430b354d4f7d5a15d (patch) | |
| tree | e892dc92946b3170a92ee83eb0e1a7bd3294d351 | |
| parent | e6b6ea025cc0b6e5cdb7a3bf6d9275afdd861e51 (diff) | |
Fix thinko in comment.
This comment has been wrong since its introduction in commit 0d5f05cde;
backpatch to v12 where that came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK14VGf-xQjGQN4o1QyAbXAaxugU5%3DqfcmTDh1iufUDnV_w%40mail.gmail.com
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/commands/copyfrom.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/copyfrom.c b/src/backend/commands/copyfrom.c index e8bb168aea..175aa837f2 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/copyfrom.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/copyfrom.c @@ -732,8 +732,8 @@ CopyFrom(CopyFromState cstate) * For partitioned tables we can't support multi-inserts when there * are any statement level insert triggers. It might be possible to * allow partitioned tables with such triggers in the future, but for - * now, CopyMultiInsertInfoFlush expects that any before row insert - * and statement level insert triggers are on the same relation. + * now, CopyMultiInsertInfoFlush expects that any after row insert and + * statement level insert triggers are on the same relation. */ insertMethod = CIM_SINGLE; } |