diff options
| author | Noah Misch | 2014-03-23 06:13:43 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Noah Misch | 2014-03-23 06:13:43 +0000 |
| commit | c31305de5f5a4880b0ba2f5983025ef0210a3b2a (patch) | |
| tree | 023626f01b9c6666d81feb701fe86d242ea16563 | |
| parent | 4c0e97c2d58f1cec9fc24237342962811de3cfee (diff) | |
Address ccvalid/ccnoinherit in TupleDesc support functions.
equalTupleDescs() neglected both of these ConstrCheck fields, and
CreateTupleDescCopyConstr() neglected ccnoinherit. At this time, the
only known behavior defect resulting from these omissions is constraint
exclusion disregarding a CHECK constraint validated by an ALTER TABLE
VALIDATE CONSTRAINT statement issued earlier in the same transaction.
Back-patch to 9.2, where these fields were introduced.
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/access/common/tupdesc.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/access/common/tupdesc.c b/src/backend/access/common/tupdesc.c index db8cb82272..74cfb6499a 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/common/tupdesc.c +++ b/src/backend/access/common/tupdesc.c @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ CreateTupleDescCopyConstr(TupleDesc tupdesc) if (constr->check[i].ccbin) cpy->check[i].ccbin = pstrdup(constr->check[i].ccbin); cpy->check[i].ccvalid = constr->check[i].ccvalid; + cpy->check[i].ccnoinherit = constr->check[i].ccnoinherit; } } @@ -458,7 +459,9 @@ equalTupleDescs(TupleDesc tupdesc1, TupleDesc tupdesc2) for (j = 0; j < n; check2++, j++) { if (strcmp(check1->ccname, check2->ccname) == 0 && - strcmp(check1->ccbin, check2->ccbin) == 0) + strcmp(check1->ccbin, check2->ccbin) == 0 && + check1->ccvalid == check2->ccvalid && + check1->ccnoinherit == check2->ccnoinherit) break; } if (j >= n) |