|
Abstract
| A critical step of radiation hardness assurance (RHA) for space systems is given by the parts selection in accordance with the observed (or estimated) radiation effects. Although radiation testing is the most decisive way of studying the radiation degradation of electronic components, the increasing use of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) devices and the challenges posed by $NewSpace$ are pushing the need of finding new approaches to assess the risk associated with radiation environments. This work tries to evaluate if valuable information might be extracted from archival data to carry out this assessment despite the well-known and dramatic lot-to-lot, or even part-to-part, variability for some technologies and the impact of the different test conditions, such as the bias conditions and the dose rate in enhanced low dose rate sensitivity (ELDRS). These factors are briefly analyzed for some examples. A new radiation database is briefly introduced, and some statistical approaches are cited, apart from the analysis herein followed. To finish, a first analysis on three families of bipolar transistors is presented together with the independent results from three external reports, with a good agreement between the experimental results and the expected ones. |