Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1912.00011

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory

arXiv:1912.00011 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 Nov 2019]

Title:Heuristic Strategies in Uncertain Approval Voting Environments

Authors:Jaelle Scheuerman, Jason L. Harman, Nicholas Mattei, K. Brent Venable
View a PDF of the paper titled Heuristic Strategies in Uncertain Approval Voting Environments, by Jaelle Scheuerman and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In many collective decision making situations, agents vote to choose an alternative that best represents the preferences of the group. Agents may manipulate the vote to achieve a better outcome by voting in a way that does not reflect their true preferences. In real world voting scenarios, people often do not have complete information about other voter preferences and it can be computationally complex to identify a strategy that will maximize their expected utility. In such situations, it is often assumed that voters will vote truthfully rather than expending the effort to strategize. However, being truthful is just one possible heuristic that may be used. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of heuristics in single winner and multi-winner approval voting scenarios with missing votes. In particular, we look at heuristics where a voter ignores information about other voting profiles and makes their decisions based solely on how much they like each candidate. In a behavioral experiment, we show that people vote truthfully in some situations and prioritize high utility candidates in others. We examine when these behaviors maximize expected utility and show how the structure of the voting environment affects both how well each heuristic performs and how humans employ these heuristics.
Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1905.12104
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); General Economics (econ.GN)
MSC classes: 91A80, 91B10, 91B12, 91B14
ACM classes: J.4; I.2
Cite as: arXiv:1912.00011 [cs.GT]
  (or arXiv:1912.00011v1 [cs.GT] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.00011
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jaelle Scheuerman [view email]
[v1] Fri, 29 Nov 2019 13:38:34 UTC (267 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Heuristic Strategies in Uncertain Approval Voting Environments, by Jaelle Scheuerman and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.GT
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-12
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.MA
econ
econ.GN
q-fin
q-fin.EC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Jaelle Scheuerman
Jason L. Harman
Nicholas Mattei
Kristen Brent Venable
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack