Computer Science > Information Theory
[Submitted on 23 Aug 2016 (v1), last revised 13 Dec 2016 (this version, v2)]
Title:A Compression-Complexity Measure of Integrated Information
View PDFAbstract:Quantifying integrated information is a leading approach towards building a fundamental theory of consciousness. Integrated Information Theory (IIT) has gained attention in this regard due to its theoretically strong framework. However, it faces some limitations such as current state dependence, computationally expensive and inability to be applied to real brain data. On the other hand, Perturbational Complexity Index (PCI) is a clinical measure for distinguishing different levels of consciousness. Though PCI claims to capture the functional differentiation and integration in brain networks (similar to IIT), its link to integrated information theories is rather weak. Inspired by these two approaches, we propose a new measure - $\Phi^C$ using a novel compression-complexity perspective that serves as a bridge between the two, for the first time. $\Phi^C$ is founded on the principles of lossless data compression based complexity measures which characterize the dynamical complexity of brain networks. $\Phi^{C}$ exhibits following salient innovations: (i) mathematically well bounded, (ii) negligible current state dependence unlike $\Phi$, (iii) integrated information measured as compression-complexity rather than as an infotheoretic quantity, and (iv) faster to compute since number of atomic bipartitions scales linearly with the number of nodes of the network, thus avoiding combinatorial explosion. Our computer simulations show that $\Phi^C$ has similar hierarchy to $<\Phi>$ for several multiple-node networks and it demonstrates a rich interplay between differentiation, integration and entropy of the nodes of a network. $\Phi^C$ is a promising heuristic measure to characterize the quantity of integrated information (and hence a measure of quantity of consciousness) in larger networks like human brain and provides an opportunity to test the predictions of brain complexity on real neural data.
Submission history
From: Mohit Virmani [view email][v1] Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:33:04 UTC (2,418 KB)
[v2] Tue, 13 Dec 2016 22:25:59 UTC (2,614 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.IT
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.