Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:1601.02351 (cs)
[Submitted on 11 Jan 2016]

Title:Assessing and Improving the Mutation Testing Practice of PIT

Authors:Thomas Laurent, Anthony Ventresque, Mike Papadakis, Christopher Henard, Yves Le Traon (CSC)
View PDF
Abstract:Mutation testing is used extensively to support the experimentation of software engineering studies. Its application to real-world projects is possible thanks to modern tools that automate the whole mutation analysis process. However, popular mutation testing tools use a restrictive set of mutants which do not conform to the community standards as supported by the mutation testing literature. This can be problematic since the effectiveness of mutation depends on its mutants. We therefore examine how effective are the mutants of a popular mutation testing tool, named PIT, compared to comprehensive ones, as drawn from the literature and personal experience. We show that comprehensive mutants are harder to kill and encode faults not captured by the mutants of PIT for a range of 11% to 62% of the Java classes of the considered projects.
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:1601.02351 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:1601.02351v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.02351

Submission history

From: Christopher Henard [view email] [via CCSD proxy]
[v1] Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:56:34 UTC (703 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-01
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Thomas Laurent
Anthony Ventresque
Mike Papadakis
Christopher Henard
Yves Le Traon
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)