On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> it looks like I can probably rip that member out of TupOutputState
>> altogether.
>
>> Will update patch. Does this look like what you were thinking otherwise?
>
> Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking.
Excellent. Revised patch attached.
...Robert