案件名
|
引用
|
简介
|
爱德华兹诉加利福尼亚州案
|
314 U.S. 160 (1941)
|
Commerce Clause, privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment
|
雷森巴诉加利福尼亚州人民案
|
314 U.S. 219 (1941)
|
死刑
|
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
|
315 U.S. 568 (1942)
|
挑起争端的语言
|
Valentine v. Chrestensen
|
316 U.S. 52 (1942)
|
holding that commercial speech is unprotected by the 1st Amendment
|
美国诉优力威透镜公司案
|
316 U.S. 241 (1942)
|
exhaustion doctrine under U.S. patent law and its relation to price fixing
|
贝茨诉布拉迪案
|
316 U.S. 455 (1942)
|
due process, incorporation
|
斯金娜诉俄克拉何马案
|
316 U.S. 535 (1942)
|
强制性绝育,优生学
|
Jones v. City of Opelika I
|
316 U.S. 584 (1942)
|
holding a statute prohibiting the sale of books without a license was constitutional
|
Ex parte Quirin
|
317 U.S. 1 (1942)
|
military tribunals for enemy spies
|
Wickard v. Filburn
|
317 U.S. 111 (1942)
|
Commerce Clause
|
Williams et al. v. State of North Carolina
|
317 U.S. 287 (1942)
|
Divorce and marriage recognition between states
|
帕克诉布朗案
|
317 U.S. 341 (1943)
|
Parker immunity doctrine in United States antitrust law
|
克利尔菲尔信托公司诉合众国案
|
318 U.S. 363 (1943)
|
Negotiable instruments, Federal common law
|
拉琴特诉得克萨斯州案
|
318 U.S. 418 (1943)
|
city ordinance requiring permits in order to solicit orders for books is unconstitutional as applied to the distribution of religious publications
|
Jones v. City of Opelika II
|
319 U.S. 103 (1943)
|
Overruling Jones v. City of Opelika I on rehearing
|
Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
|
319 U.S. 105 (1943)
|
licensing fee for door-to-door solicitors was an unconstitutional tax on the Jehovah's Witnesses' right to freely exercise their religion—decided same day as Jones v. City of Opelika II
|
马丁诉斯特拉瑟斯案
|
319 U.S. 141 (1943)
|
law prohibiting the distribution of handbills door-to-door violated the First Amendment rights of a Jehovah's Witness--decided same day as Jones v. City of Opelika II
|
道格拉斯诉珍妮特城案
|
319 U.S. 157 (1943)
|
restraint of criminal prosecution for violation of ordinance disputed in Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania--decided same day as Jones v. City of Opelika II
|
国家广播股份有限公司诉合众国案
|
319 U.S. 190 (1943)
|
广播网的管理
|
伯福德诉太阳石油公司案
|
319 U.S. 315 (1943)
|
弃权政策
|
Altvater v. Freeman
|
319 U.S. 359 (1943)
|
justiciability and declaratory judgments
|
加洛韦诉合众国案
|
319 U.S. 372 (1943)
|
directed verdict, 7th Amendment
|
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United States
|
319 U.S. 598 (1943)
|
restricted Indian land is exempt from state estate taxes
|
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
|
319 U.S. 624 (1943)
|
第一宪法修正案,建立宗教
|
平林诉合众国案
|
320 U.S. 81 (1943)
|
curfews against members of a minority group during a war with their country of origin
|
安井诉合众国案
|
320 U.S. 115 (1943)
|
validity of curfews against U.S. citizens of a minority group during war
|
Prince v. Massachusetts
|
321 U.S. 158 (1944)
|
religious liberty and child labor
|
Follett v. Town of McCormick
|
321 U.S. 573 (1944)
|
licensing fees for distribution of religious materials violates freedom of religion
|
Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. Muscoda Local No. 123
|
321 U.S. 590 (1944)
|
miners' travel time was "work" under the Fair Labor Standards Act
|
Smith v. Allwright
|
321 U.S. 649 (1944)
|
voting rights, segregation
|
美国诉巴拉德案
|
322 U.S. 78 (1944)
|
religious fraud
|
NLRB v. Hearst Publications
|
322 U.S. 111 (1944)
|
determining whether newsboys are employees or independent contractors for the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act
|
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association
|
322 U.S. 533 (1944)
|
applying Sherman Antitrust Act to insurance contracts
|
Skidmore v. Swift & Co.
|
323 U.S. 134 (1944)
|
early standard for judicial review of interpretive rules made by government agencies
|
是松诉合众国案
|
323 U.S. 214 (1944)
|
Japanese Internment camps
|
Ex parte Endo
|
323 U.S. 283 (1944)
|
Japanese-American internment and loyalty, decided same day as Korematsu
|
United States v. Willow River Power Co.
|
324 U.S. 499 (1945)
|
nature of property rights which constitute a compensable taking
|
克拉默诉合众国案
|
325 U.S. 1 (1945)
|
conviction for treason
|
Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America
|
325 U.S. 161 (1945)
|
underground travel time of coal miners was considered compensable work time under the Fair Labor Standards Act
|
南太平洋公司诉亚利桑那州案
|
325 U.S. 761 (1945)
|
Dormant Commerce Clause
|
Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
|
326 U.S. 99 (1945)
|
Interpretation of the Erie Doctrine
|
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
|
326 U.S. 310 (1945)
|
personal jurisdiction of states over corporations in other states
|
Commissioner v. Flowers
|
326 U.S. 465 (1946)
|
tax deduction for travel expenses under the Internal Revenue Code
|
马什诉阿拉巴拉州案
|
326 U.S. 501 (1946)
|
First and Fourteenth Amendments still applicable against a company town
|
塔克诉德克萨斯州案
|
326 U.S. 517 (1946)
|
Local ordinance prohibiting distribution of religious literature violated Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment
|
Estep v. United States
|
327 U.S. 114 (1946)
|
judicial review of draft board determinations
|
邓肯诉卡哈纳莫库案
|
327 U.S. 304 (1946)
|
constitutionality of military tribunals under the Hawaiian Organic Act
|
Commissioner v. Wilcox
|
327 U.S. 404 (1946)
|
embezzled funds not considered taxable income, later overruled by James v. United States
|
Lavender v. Kurn
|
327 U.S. 645 (1946)
|
sufficiency of evidence to send a case to a jury
|
格罗伍德诉合众国案
|
328 U.S. 61 (1946)
|
pacifism is not a reason to deny an immigrant citizenship. Overturned United States v. Schwimmer (1929).
|
United States v. Causby
|
328 U.S. 256 (1946)
|
the ancient common law doctrine of ad coelum has no legal effect "in the modern world."
|
Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.
|
328 U.S. 293 (1946)
|
definition of "investment contract" under the Securities Act of 1933
|
Colegrove v. Green
|
328 U.S. 549 (1946)
|
federal courts had no power to become involved in state legislative apportionment—later overruled by Baker v. Carr
|
平克顿诉合众国案
|
328 U.S. 640 (1946)
|
the doctrine of conspiracy, Pinkerton Liability
|
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
|
328 U.S. 680 (1946) Girouard v. United States, 328 U.S. 61 (1946)
|
Preliminary work activities are covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act
|