Wikidata:Property proposal/yearly energy consumption: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} === |
}} === |
||
{{Property proposal |
{{Property proposal |
||
|status = |
|status = withdrawn |
||
|description = {{TranslateThis |
|description = {{TranslateThis |
||
| en = yearly energy consumption in TWh |
| en = yearly energy consumption in TWh |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* {{Question}} What about [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q131723#P2791 P2791]? We can broad the scope of {{P|2791}}. --<span style="text-shadow: 1px 1px 4px purple">[[User:Tinker Bell|Tinker Bell]] [[User_talk:Tinker Bell|<span style="color:#ed428d;font-size:1.4em">★</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Tinker Bell|<span style="color:#ed428d;font-size:1.1em">♥</span>]]</span> 05:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC) |
* {{Question}} What about [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q131723#P2791 P2791]? We can broad the scope of {{P|2791}}. --<span style="text-shadow: 1px 1px 4px purple">[[User:Tinker Bell|Tinker Bell]] [[User_talk:Tinker Bell|<span style="color:#ed428d;font-size:1.4em">★</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Tinker Bell|<span style="color:#ed428d;font-size:1.1em">♥</span>]]</span> 05:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
:* Sounds like a good idea to me :)--[[User:So9q|So9q]] ([[User talk:So9q|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC) |
:* Sounds like a good idea to me :)--[[User:So9q|So9q]] ([[User talk:So9q|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
*{{ping|So9q}} I closed this as withdrawn. Ok? --- [[User talk:Jura1|Jura]] 12:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:34, 15 July 2020
yearly energy consumption
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Withdrawn
| Description | yearly energy consumption in TWh |
|---|---|
| Represents | item |
| Data type | Quantity |
| Domain | Q13479982 |
| Allowed units | Q2659078 |
| Example 1 | bitcoin (Q131723) → 76 (https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption) |
| Example 2 | Ethereum (Q16783523) → 7.18 (https://digiconomist.net/ethereum-energy-consumption) |
| Example 3 | MISSING |
Motivation
I would like to be able to rank cryptocurrencies according to their power consumption. --So9q (talk) 12:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
Question What about P2791? We can broad the scope of power consumed (P2791). --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 05:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good idea to me :)--So9q (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- @So9q: I closed this as withdrawn. Ok? --- Jura 12:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)