Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 33 views

    Name of Student: - : Rubric For Grading Video Reflection College of Nursing

    Uploaded by

    Jamaica Leslie Noveno
    This 3-paragraph rubric evaluates student video reflections for a nursing course. It assesses understanding of video content (35%), format of the written reflection (15%), and personal reflection on the video and its relation to course topics (35%). The final 15% is for mechanics including grammar, spelling, and overall writing quality. Reflections are graded on a scale of excellent to poor based on demonstration of critical thinking, use of course terminology, organization, personal reaction, and mechanics. The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring student work in each criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Name of Student: - : Rubric For Grading Video Reflection College of Nursing

    Uploaded by

    Jamaica Leslie Noveno
    33 views1 page
    This 3-paragraph rubric evaluates student video reflections for a nursing course. It assesses understanding of video content (35%), format of the written reflection (15%), and personal reflection on the video and its relation to course topics (35%). The final 15% is for mechanics including grammar, spelling, and overall writing quality. Reflections are graded on a scale of excellent to poor based on demonstration of critical thinking, use of course terminology, organization, personal reaction, and mechanics. The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring student work in each criteria.

    Original Title

    RUBRIC.Video-Reflection (3)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This 3-paragraph rubric evaluates student video reflections for a nursing course. It assesses understanding of video content (35%), format of the written reflection (15%), and personal reflection on the video and its relation to course topics (35%). The final 15% is for mechanics including grammar, spelling, and overall writing quality. Reflections are graded on a scale of excellent to poor based on demonstration of critical thinking, use of course terminology, organization, personal reaction, and mechanics. The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring student work in each criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    33 views1 page

    Name of Student: - : Rubric For Grading Video Reflection College of Nursing

    Uploaded by

    Jamaica Leslie Noveno
    This 3-paragraph rubric evaluates student video reflections for a nursing course. It assesses understanding of video content (35%), format of the written reflection (15%), and personal reflection on the video and its relation to course topics (35%). The final 15% is for mechanics including grammar, spelling, and overall writing quality. Reflections are graded on a scale of excellent to poor based on demonstration of critical thinking, use of course terminology, organization, personal reaction, and mechanics. The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring student work in each criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    UPHSL/DJGTMU-ACAD-GVR-16

    01-04-2021

    RUBRIC FOR GRADING VIDEO REFLECTION


    COLLEGE OF NURSING
    Name of Student: ___________________________________

    Criteria Description Your My Remarks


    Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Grade
    Understanding of the Provides evidence of Provides new Uses some basic course Provides no critical Quotes not identified and
    video content critical thinking. Avoids perspective and relation terminology but limited thinking and only a unacceptable. Student either
    35 % simple explanations of to the issues addressed critical thinking about the summary of what did not submit the assignment
    terminology but rather in the course. Uses film's purpose, theme, occurred. Gives no or was unable to demonstrate
    relates the terminology to terminology learned actions, and/or conflict relation to the course work enough knowledge to receive
    -Relation to the topics the film and the purpose from the course in presented or terminology credit for the assignment.
    discuss in class appropriate ways
    -Use of terminology
    from course
    -Shows critical thinking
    Format of Paper Very clear and organized Outline is clear in Some outline attempted in Does not follow an Student either did not submit
    15 % ideas presentation of ideas organization of ideas. organized outline of ideas the assignment or was unable
    Unclear transitions to new to demonstrate enough
    ideas knowledge to receive credit
    for the discussion.
    Personal Reflection Reflection flows well and Good overall reaction is Some reflection but lacks Very vague and no Nothing submitted. No
    35 % integrates learning from presented. Reflection of in ability to relate to what personal reaction reflection and/or reaction
    the coursework as well as what was personally was learned through the included. Inappropriate
    -Addresses personal the film. Expression of learned from the film film use of reflection taking up
    reaction to film some personal reaction to and the relation to the majority of the paper
    -Acknowledges any the film, the book, and the course
    emotion or thought of a course (if applicable).
    personal nature
    Mechanics Virtually free of grammar Generally appropriate Spelling errors. Several Many spelling errors. Student either did not submit
    15 % and spelling errors. usage of grammar and grammatical errors. Difficulty understanding the assignment or was unable
    punctuation. Evidence of ideas due to improper to demonstrate enough
    -Grammar spell check used grammar knowledge to receive credit
    -Spelling for the assignment.

    TOTAL
    100- 95: Excellent 94-90: Very Good 89-85: Good 84- 80: Fair 79 below: Poor
    Course Title: Page 1
    Prepared by: Precy P. Lantin, MAN, RN
    Evaluated by: _____________________________

    You might also like