KCCI's Proposals For Federal Budget 2021-22 (Draft For Approval) FEB 20, 2021 With Annexure
KCCI's Proposals For Federal Budget 2021-22 (Draft For Approval) FEB 20, 2021 With Annexure
KCCI's Proposals For Federal Budget 2021-22 (Draft For Approval) FEB 20, 2021 With Annexure
In a radically changed environment, the Government of Pakistan and policymakers have to bear these new realities and global
transformation in mind while working on Budgetary measures for the year 2021-22. Outdated economic policies, a stifling taxation
regime and antiquated and obstructionist administrative structure of FBR and its subordinate departments will only be counter-
productive for the economy if some drastic measures are not taken in the budget to rectify the flaws and discard the outdated revenue
models. The country and its economy need Out-of-Box solutions and not a budget in the usual age-old template which we see year
after year, followed by a plethora of SROs, Amendments, Rules, notifications and clarifications. Such practices over the years have
hampered growth and capped the true potential of entrepreneurs in Pakistan and resulted in rapid growth of undocumented economy
having a size larger than documented economy.
In this perspective, the Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Industry has compiled proposals for the Federal Budget 2021-2022 based on
recommendations and feedback from its members, representatives of major business sectors and senior advisers. Being a trade-body
representing the tax-payers contributing the major part of revenues to national exchequer, KCCI is acutely aware of ground realities
of trade and industry and well acquainted with both micro and macro issues faced by business community.
Therefore our proposals presented herewith for upcoming Budget for FY 2021-22 carry pivotal importance and will have a positive
impact on business and investment climate, ease of doing business and overall growth of economy. We hope these proposals will
receive due importance and will be incorporated in the Budget 2021-22.
POST REFUND AUDITS EXCESSIVE DOCUMENTS ARE DEMANDED UNNECESSARILY IN THE NAME OF POST REFUND AUDIT, CREATING
UNNECESSARY HARDSHIP AND PAPERWORK WHICH IS ALREADY IN POSSESSION OF THE DEPARTMENT.
DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE ALREADY SUBMITTED SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED IN THE NAME OF POST-REFUND
AUDIT.
FASTER-ERROR FASTER SYSTEM INCORRECTLY PROCESSED AND ISSUED RS.1/- RPOS AND THE FBR TRANSFERRED SUCH CLAIM
TO CONCERNED FIELD OFFICES (RTO/CTO/LTO). THIS IS PROCESS FURTHER DELAYS THE REFUNDS. THEREFORE
CORRECTION SUCH CASES SHOULD BE RE-PROCESSED ON FASTER SYSTEM INSTEAD OF TRANSFERRING TO RTO/CTO/LTO.
FASTER SYSTEM HAS TO BE IMPROVED TO FACILITATE THE TAX PAYERS AND DELAYS SHOULD BE AVOIDED.
3% VALUE ADDITION TAX 3% VALUE ADDITION SALES TAX HAS BEEN RE-IMPOSED ON COMMERCIAL IMPORT OF RAW MATERIALS. IN
FINANCE ACT’2020 VIDE AMENDMENT IN TWELFTH SCHEDULE TO SALES TAX ACT’1990 –UNDER HEADING
ON IMPORT OF RAW “PROCEDURE AND CONDITIONS”, IN CONDITION (2),
MATERIALS VALUE ADDITION S.TAX AT ON COMMERCIAL IMPORTERS OF RAW MATERIALS WAS REMOVED IN THE FINANCE
ACT’2019 AFTER LENGTHY DELIBERATIONS WITH FBR AND MINISTRY OF FINANCE FOR YEARS, BECAUSE
COMMERCIAL IMPORTERS DO NOT ADD ANY VALUE TO RAW MATERIALS AND SELL IT IN THE SAME FORM. SUCH
VALUE ADDITION OF 3% IS UNJUST AND AN ANOMALY UNDER THE LAW. IT SHOULD THEREFORE BE REMOVED,
AS FBR ITSELF HAD AGREED IN TAX MEASURES IN BUGET 2019-20.
SEC.140 ACCESS TO BANK SEC.140, ACCESS TO BANK ACCOUNTS FOR RECOVERY OF TAX FROM REGISTERED PERSONS. THIS PROVISION
AND FURTHER ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON BANK ACCOUNTS UNDER OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW, HAVE BEEN
ACCOUNTS & RECOVERY COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE AND LED TO A FLOURISHING CASH ECONOMY. MANY INNOVATIVE WAYS HAVE BEEN
EVOLVED BY BUSINESSES SIMILAR TO BLOCK-CHAIN AND A LOCAL HUNDI SYSTEM. MOST TRANSACTIONS ARE
TAKING PLACE OUTSIDE BANKING CHANNELS. THE PROVISION SHOULD BE REMOVED OR AMENDED TO
RESTRICT ACCESS AND ARBITRARY RECOVERY FROM BANK ACCOUNTS.
WHT 4% TO 4.5% ON LOCAL WHT @4.0% TO 4.5% OF GROSS INVOICE VALUE IS DEDUCTED ON SUPPLY OF GOODS BY FILER COMPANIES AND
REGISTERED PERSONS RESPECTIVELY.
SUPPLIES BUYERS AND MIDDLEMAN DEMAND IMPORTER/MANUFACTURER TO ISSUE INVOICE DIRECTLY IN THE NAME OF
ULTIMATE BUYER TO AVOID THIS HARSH AND EXCESSIVE TAX. RATE OF 4.0% TO 4.5% WHT U/S 153(A) IS VERY
HIGH. IT MAY BE REDUCED TO 1% FOR FILERS AND IT MAY BE ADJUSTABLE. WHT SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
ACROSS THE SUPPLY CHAIN AND 1% MAY BE RECOVERED AT EACH STAGE.
SMUGGLING OF BLACK TEA CONSUMPTION OF BLACK TEA IN PAKISTAN IS 240,000 TONS, BUT THE IMPORTS THROUGH LEGAL CHANNELS IS
HARDLY 100,000 TONS DUE TO HIGH RATES OF CUSTOMS DUTY, SALES TAX, R.D. AND WHT. REMAINING
DUE TO HIGH TARIFFS REQUIREMENT FILLED BY SMUGGLING, ATT, AND IMPORTS UNDER VARIOUS EXEMPTIONS/CONCESSIONS
GRANTED TO PATA AND AZAD KASHMIR WHICH CONDUCT 90% OF OFFICIAL IMPORTS. RATES OF CUSTOMS
DUTY, SALES TAX, RD & WHT MAY BE RATIONALIZED TO PREVENT SMUGGLING AND MASSIVE LEAKAGE OF
REVENUE. (PLS DETAILED PROPOSAL)
1 SALES TAX 1
1.1 SALES TAX – POLICY RELATED 1
1 REVIVE SRO 1125 IN REAL SPIRIT / RESTORE ZERO RATING OF SALES TAX 2
2 CNIC - UNREGISTERED PERSONS 3
3 RAW MATERIAL SALES TO UNREGISTERED UNITS - 3% FURTHER TAX 4
4 HIGH RATE OF SALES TAX 17% 4
5 FURNITURE SHOPS AND WORKSHOPS WRONGLY TREATED AS TIER-1 RETAILERS 5
6 SALES TAX ACT SIXTH SCHEDULE SERIAL NO. 52 A 6
7 DISCREPANCY IN SALES TAX REFUND ON FASTER 6
8 INPUT TAX DISALLOWED IN SALES TAX RETURN 6
9 DISCREPANCIES POINTED OUT IN “SALES TAX REGISTRATION” 7
10 MISUSE OF POWERS UNDER SEC.38B: RAIDS AND SURPRISE INSPECTIONS BY FBR & I,I & P PERSONNEL 7
11 NON FILING OF RETURN 8
12 SRO NO. 98(I)/2021 8
13 ABSOLUTE MONOPOLY OF AUTO ASSEMBLERS ON DUE TO DECADES OF PROTECTION / CONCESSIONS 9
2 INCOME TAX 22
2.1 INCOME TAX – POLICY RELATED 22
31 BURDEN AND MULTIPLICITY OF TAXES OVER ALREADY REGISTERED TAXPAYERS & FILERS 23
32 EXEMPTION OF WHT PAYMENT FOR EXPORTERS UNDER FTR REGIME U/S 154(3B) 23
33 DISTORTIONS IN WITH-HOLDING TAX REGIME 24
34 ACCESS TO BANK ACCOUNTS AND TRANSACTIONS OF TAX-PAYERS SEC.140 AND NEW PROVISIONS 56 AB 25
3 CUSTOMS 42
59 SRO 327 EXPORT ORIENTED UNITS 43
DUTY & TAX REMISSION FOR EXPORTERS (DTRE): GARMENT STITCHING UNITS MANUFACTURERS-CUM-
60 44
EXPORTERS WHO DO NOT HAVE COMPOSITE UNITS BE ALLOWED FACILITATION UNDER DTRE SCHEME
61 DUTY ON IMPORT / EXPORT OF COTTON YARN 45
62 HIGH TARIFF RATES ON IMPORT OF FOOD AND CONSUMER ITEMS 45
63 ANOMALIES AND TAXES AND CUSTOMS DUTY REGIME ON BLACK TEA CAUSING MASSIVE SMUGGLING 46
64 EXCESSIVE CUSTOM DUTIES ON IMPORT OF EMPTY ALUMINUM BEVERAGE CANS 46
INCLUSION OF AUTOMOBILE AND MOTORCYCLE SPARE PARTS IN THIRD SCHEDULE – REQUIREMENT OF
65 47
MRP
66 PAPER AND PAPER BOARD-ANOMALIES 48
ADDITION OF OPTICAL FIBER CABLES (PCT NO. 8544.7000) AND TELEPHONE CABLES (PCT NO. 8544.4910)
67 48
IN SRO 211(1)/2009, DATED 05-03-2009, SCHEDULE XXIV, FOR REPAYMENT OF CUSTOMS DUTIES
68 REVIEW OF TARIFF RATES FOR DOMESTIC CABLE AND OPTIC FIBRE CABLES INDUSTRY 49
NO ADJUSTMENT ON IMPORTS OF RAW MATERIALS BY INDUSTRIAL UNDERTAKING FOR MANUFACTURING
69 50
OF OPTICAL FIBER CABLE
70 HIGH RATES OF DUTY AND SALES TAX ON SODIUM METABISULPHITE 51
71 HIGH TARIFFS ON SODIUM HYDROGEN SULPHITE H.S. 2832.1010 51
72 HIGH RATES OF C.DUTY AND TAXES ON FORMIC ACID 51
73 CHANGES IN CUSTOMS ACT 52
Furniture Shops do not fulfill the criteria defined under Sec.2, Sub-Sec.43A of Sales Tax Act’1990 because :
1. Furniture does not fall in Category of Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG).
2. Furniture Shops/Showrooms are only for the purpose of display of bulky pieces of furniture and to get orders from
customers, rather than retail sale. The display requires area larger than 1000 feet and an anomaly is created under the Sub-
OUTCOME Section 43A which wrongly classifies such shops/showrooms as Tier 1 Retailer.
3. With rapid increase in rates of Electricity, the amount of Twelve Hundred Thousand in a year for commercial establishment
should not be made a condition to qualify as Tier 1 retailer.
4. Under Definition of Cottage Industry (5AB), the amount of turnover of Rs.3.0 Million is very unrealistic. Such cottage industry
cannot employ 10 persons or earn a profit of even Rs.25000/- per month after paying for materials, labor and overheads.
a. Furniture shops/showrooms and workshops which are not part of national or international chain of Stores and not located
in an airconditioned Mall, should be excluded from the scope of Sec.2 (Sub.Sec.43A)
b. All such furniture shops and work-shops may be included in Cottage Industry.(5AB) or treated as SMEs.
PROPOSAL c. Amount of Turnover as defined under 5AB should be enhanced to Rs.50.0 Million.
d. Minimum covered area defined for inclusion in Tier 1 for a furniture showroom/shop does not have relevance in Furniture
business as it does not reflect the volume of sales or turnover and therefore should not be the parameter to determine the
Tier of retailer
1. Stop harassment of shop-keepers, show room and work shop owners in the name of registration in Tier-1.
2. Protect the employment of hundreds of thousands skilled workers artisans and laborers.
BENEFIT
3. Preserve the industry of traditional hand-crafted furniture spread all over the country.
ISSUE Deferred refund claims are referred to concerned offices (RTO/CTO/LTO) for processing which delays the refund.
Procedure which stipulates deferred or missing refunds to be processed by RTO, CTO & LTO create hardship for exporters and causes
OUTCOME undue delays.
PROPOSAL It is proposed that all types of refunds should be processed through FASTER system i.e. one stage rather than multiple stages.
BENEFIT Prevent undue delays in refund and better utilization of FASTER system.
ISSUE Some purchase invoices (input tax) are disallowed because the seller has not filed his sales tax return
OUTCOME This causes the buyer to face hardship by way of disallowance of input tax, although he paid the sales tax on purchases
PROPOSAL This flaw in the system should be removed by amending the mechanism to feed in sales tax return portal through additional checks
No option is available in IRIS registration 181-form to declare “Commercial Exporter / Importer” as principal activity.
ISSUE Addition of business principal activity as Manufacturer is very complicated.
Principals and business activities are in the same place in the IRIS 181-Form creating confusion.
Due to the flaws in IRIS 181-Form, Commercial Exporters/Importers have to pick the option of “WHOLESALER” as principal activity
which is incorrect.
OUTCOME Because of the lengthy and complicated procedure taxpayer cannot specify themselves as Manufacturer.
Due to no provision of separation between Importer and Manufacturers, taxpayers in both activities face a lot of problems.
Comprehensive range of activities should be provided as options to specify clear business principal activity in IRIS 181-Form.
PROPOSAL Concerned Association should issue a certificate and FBR/Board may change the taxpayer status as Manufacturer.
Option required to be available in the system of registration so there would no fear of error during registration.
Taxpayer can easily start his business without any delay and unnecessary hassle.
BENEFIT Taxpayer profile will become well defined and clear.
MISUSE OF POWERS UNDER SEC.38B: RAIDS AND SURPRISE INSPECTIONS BY FBR & I,I & P PERSONNEL
ISSUE FBR & I,I&P personnel, Special Sales Tax Cell to harass taxpayers conduct raids and surprise inspections by misuse of powers U/S.38B.
Such raids and surprise inspections of compliant/registered taxpayers premises without any prior notices or intimations, only harass tax
OUTCOME payers and open doors for heavy under table money or bribes leading to heavy corruption. Besides it works as deterrent for other to be
documented and register in Sales Tax or Income Tax.
Such departments or cells should only focus on unregistered persons engaged having undeclared assets and undocumented business
activities of high volume and register them in the tax net. rather than raiding, inspecting or sending notices to already registered persons
who burdened with numerous amounts of taxes and complying with taxation rules and procedures.
PROPOSAL This powers under Section 38B should be withdrawn or amended to only for broadening of tax base. Uneven and flawed Tax structure of
Sales Tax, Value Added Sales Tax and Further Tax are the root cause of problems and should be reformed in way that compliance for
registered persons is easier and raids are not required.
Prevent harassment of compliant tax-payers.
BENEFIT Broaden Tax base and eliminate corruption.
Ironically the powerful lobbies in Pakistan get away with concessions and SMEs which need support are marginalized to the extent the
some are eliminated. The SRO culture flourishes and discriminatory treatment has led to misuse of benefit.
This SRO should be rescinded and 100% adjust of input tax paid at import stage should be allowed to all categories of importers of same
raw materials. Hot Rolled Coils are basic raw materials and further produce Cold Rolled, Galvanized and other coated products, by both
large and small industries. Commercial importers generally supply the raw materials to SME sector employing large number of workers.
PROPOSAL Value addition of 3% charged at import stage from commercial importers is also unjust while producers only pay 1.7%. Commercial
importers sell the material without change in form yet have to pay 3% VAT which should be withdrawn.
The listed large producers are already exempted from Regulatory Duties of up to 11% and 3% value addition tax at import stage. To allow
100% adjustment while only 90% adjustment to importers only is discriminatory and counter-productive.
1. Provide a level playing field to SMEs and discourage monopolization of an important market due to tax advantages.
BENEFIT 2. Prevent revenue losses due to unjustified concessions to conglomerates.
PROPOSAL UPTO 800 CC 50% 25% NIL 0 NIL 0 17% 17% 11% 5.50%
801 TO 1000CC 55% 27.50% NIL 0 NIL 0 17% 17% 11% 5.50%
1001 TO 1300CC 60% 30% NIL 0 NIL 0 17% 17% 11% 5.50%
1301 TO 1500CC 60% 30% NIL 0 NIL 0 17% 17% 11% 5.50%
1501 TO 1600CC 75% 37.50% NIL 0 NIL 0 17% 17% 11% 5.50%
1601 TO 1800CC 75% 37.50% NIL 0 NIL 0 17% 17% 11% 5.50%
1800 TO 2500CC 100% 50% NIL 0 20% 0 17% 17% 11% 5.50%
2500 above 100% 50% 70% 0 25% 0 17% 17% 11% 5.50%
3000CC 100% 50% 70% 0 30% 0 17% 17% 11% 5.50%
SALES TAX RETURN REVISION – RULE – 14A & Section 26(3) Despite being allowed under Clause 26(3), Tax Payers are still required
ISSUE
to get CIR’s approval for return revision.
Approval of Commissioner Inland Revenue (CIR) is required to revise return even in cases where revision is applied within 60days
OUTCOME
and the amount of tax liability is not reduced.
Sec. 26(3) should be applied completely and e-filing system should be updated to automatically to reopen revision in case its applied
PROPOSAL
within 60 days of return filing.
ISSUE Excessive documents are demanded unnecessarily in the name of Post Refund Audit
OUTCOME Taxpayers remain under pressure for submission of huge volume of records, which taxpayers had already submitted to department
No record be required in case of post refund audit as department is already in possession of all necessary documents submitted by
PROPOSAL tax-payer.
BENEFIT Ease of doing business for exporters which enables them to focus on their business instead of collecting documents.
FBR has created new LTOs which deal with taxpayers having a turnover of Rs.1.0 Billion or more.
ISSUE FBR has changed the taxpayer's jurisdictions abruptly without any intimation.
Jurisdiction of some tax payers has been transferred from LTO to CTO despite having a turnover of Rs.7.0 to Rs.8.0 Billion which has
OUTCOME created a great deal of confusion and hardship. Difficulties in transfer of soft data/hard copies of tax records from one jurisdiction
to other has created problem in processing of refunds and other issues.
Correctly and transparently implement the said policy.
PROPOSAL Transfer of Jurisdiction should be streamlined and made easier with prior intimation and valid reasoning.
Taxpayer data will be available for longer period to be checked by himself at one place.
BENEFIT Facilitate tax payers.
ISSUE KEPZ Shipping Bills (Export GDs) do not get verified or validated through FASTER System.
OUTCOME FASTER system deferred all such amount or reject the claims pertains to GDs pertaining to KEPZ.
PROPOSAL Updating is required for KEPZ export/shipments data and it should be linked with Customs and FBR database.
BENEFIT Taxpayer does not face any difficulty in getting the sales tax refund against KEPZ export/shipment.
ISSUE Difficulties in complying with time limitation for filing of Annex-H, due to revision of Sales Tax Return.
If the registered person revises his sales tax return, the FBR system (web-Portal) calculates 120-days for filing of Annex-H according
OUTCOME to the previous filing date of sales tax return instead of the date of revision of return.
It is proposed to resolve the problem and update the FBR system so that due date of Annex-H should be reset in FBR system to allow
PROPOSAL 120 days from the Date of Revision of S.Tax Return for filing of Annexure “H”
Sales tax invoices pertaining to service providers registered with different provinces sales tax authorities has to date not been
ISSUE integrated with FBR web portal, to allow input claim for tax paid on services.
OUTCOME Due to non-availability of provinces sales tax data on the system , documents have to submitted manually for claiming of refund
PROPOSAL Appropriate mechanism should be in place for availability of sales tax data of services in the system for verification of input.
BENEFIT Ensure admissibility of input tax on service invoices without any doubts.
ISSUE While filing sales tax return, at the step of Annex-B, when import GDs the option “OTHERS” is changed to “FIXED ASSETS”.
ANNEX F
ISSUE Annex F, itself is unnecessary and does not have any worth to FBR,
In Annex-F linked with annexure A and B only and has no nexus with Exempt Purchase/ Purchases from Un-registered Persons,
OUTCOME services and requires consumption of raw material in supplies which is very cumbersome
Annexure “F” shall be omitted from web portal or necessary amendments be made in it and may be required to be file bi-annually
PROPOSAL instead of each month
BENEFIT Remove the hardships in compliance.
EXPORTERS SHOULD BE ALLOWED REFUNDS OR AT LEAST ADJUSTMENT UNDER SUB-SECTION 7 OF SECTION 3, SERIAL NO. 4
OF ELEVENTH SCHEDULE OF SALES TAX ACT 1990
This is extremely harsh provision and unfair for a country whose exports are very low. Scrap/ Waste (some materials like plastic
waste, paper waste, steel scrap and several similar items) are collected by street scavengers from the drums of solid waste which
ISSUE they sell to recyclers-cum-exporters. It is chargeable to 5% Sales Tax which is actually adds to the cost of material procured by
exporters from unorganized sector.
OUTCOME This results for Pakistan Exporters to become uncompetitive as no refund/adjustment is allowed
It is proposed that Exporters should be allowed refunds or at least adjustments under Sub-Section 7 of Section 3 of Eleventh
PROPOSAL Schedule Serial No.4.
BENEFIT They can increase and manage their exports orders and earn foreign exchange to the national exchequer.
It is proposed to provide the Option in the e-filing system t to enable the tax-payer to revise returns within 60 days .After lapse of
PROPOSAL 60 days, tax-payer may request permission of the Commissioner for revision of return.
This suggestion is to avoid unnecessary hassle to the taxpayer, reduce the burden on the Commissioner and enhance tax payer
BENEFIT confidence.
Value Addition Sales Tax at import stage on commercial importers of Raw materials items in Twelfth Schedule Part-II was removed
in the Finance Act’2019-20 after lengthy deliberations with FBR and Ministry of Finance for several years, because Commercial
importers do not add any value to raw materials and sell it in the same form.
However the very next year through Finance Act’2020, amendment was made in the Twelfth Schedule to Sales Tax Act’1990 –under
ISSUE the heading “Procedure and Conditions”, in condition (2), 3% Value Addition Sales Tax has been re-imposed on Commercial Import
of Raw Materials.
Also, after re-imposition of this 3% VAT in Finance Act 2020, the amendment made in Sec 8(B) of Sales Tax Act 1990 through
SRO1190(I)/2019 allowing adjustment of input tax to a maximum of 90% of output Tax was not removed. This led to double taxation
as importers were forced to pay Extra 10% Value Addition over and above 3% paid at custom stage.
The anomaly has been created again in the Finance Bill’2020-21. VAT cannot be imposed where no value is added. No inputs such
as Gas, Electricity, Labor or Machinery are used hence 3% VAT was an obvious anomaly and contradiction in law.
OUTCOME THIS LED TO DOUBLE TAXATION AS IMPORTERS WERE FORCED TO PAY EXTRA 10% VALUE ADDITION OVER AND ABOVE 3% PAID
AT CUSTOM STAGE.
The anomaly may therefore be rectified and Raw Materials imported by Commercial Importers shall be excluded from the scope of
Condition (2) under “Procedures and Conditions” Twelfth Schedule of S.Tax Act. Thus removing 3% Value Addition Sales Tax on
PROPOSAL commercial importers which was Re-Imposed unjustly. For importers of Finished products paying 3% VAT at custom stage and
having no local purchase should be exempted from application of Sec 8(B).
1. Remove disparity in rates of Sales Tax on Raw Materials at import stage between commercial importers and industry, because all raw materials
BENEFIT are ultimately consumed in industry.
2. To have a fair taxation regime wherein compliant tax-payers should not be unjustly taxed only to meet the revenue targets.
SECTION 37
Enquiry before office of IR deemed judicial proceedings within the meaning of 193-228 CPC (Act XLV of 1860). The provisions treats
ISSUE business persons as criminals putting them within the scope of PPC.
OUTCOME Such provisions are in fact the root cause of narrow tax base and a flourishing undocumented economy.
The provision should be removed and replaced with new provisions to separate the jurisdiction to deal with offences of taxation regime
and providing the accused sufficient opportunity of defend his case before the tribunals which are independent of FBR and headed by
PROPOSAL competent judges.
The tribunals should also have the powers to deal with offences and excesses committed by officers performing duties within FBR or any
of its department, division or field formation.
BENEFIT Create a fair taxation regime and prevent abuse of sweeping powers to the officers of Inland Revenue.
ISSUE Currently, the Taxpayers and Filers, particularly the industries are overburdened with multiplicity of taxes.
OUTCOME Overburden of taxes on already registered taxpayers deprive them of level playing field and business viability against non-taxpayers.
It is proposed that all the entities engaged in business having commercial and industrial utility connections but are out of tax
base should be brought to tax-net making them taxpayers and filers.
PROPOSAL According to NEPRA Industry Report 2019 and FBR Tax Directory Data 2018, the number of commercial and industrial consumers
are higher as compared to registered Tax Payers with a huge difference who must be brought into tax-net as they are commercial
and industrial entities but out of tax-net.
It will ease down the burden of taxes over registered taxpayers and shall also broaden the tax base resulting to further
BENEFIT documentation of economy.
EXEMPTION OF WHT PAYMENT FOR EXPORTERS UNDER FTR REGIME U/S 154(3B)
Currently WHT is charged at various levels and items such as import of raw material, registration of new vehicles etc. which is
ISSUE adjusted or refunded later.
Exporters whose Customs Rebate Claims, Sales Tax Claims and WHT Claims are pending face severe liquidity crunch which is
OUTCOME causing them great hardship.
Exporters fall under final tax regime u/s 154(3B) and should be exempted from payment of WHT and be given Exemption
PROPOSAL Certificates. This will greatly benefit them and also lower workload on FBR who are busy in a futile exercise. They will be getting
more time to focus on broadening of tax base which is dire need of the time. Withholding Tax should be reduced from 1% to 0.50%.
BENEFIT - This would also help our exporters in using the cash liquidity for enhancement of the exports of Pakistan.
Imposition of With-Holding Tax (WHT) on various stages of supply chain (Importers, Manufacturers, wholesalers and Distributors)
ISSUE
has created complexities and distortions. It has made compliance very difficult for most tax-payers.
After acquiring powers to access information from all institutions under Sec.56 AB, FBR and its subordinate departments must take
OUTCOME the responsibility to identity non-compliant and undocumented entities/persons instead of laying responsibility on existing
taxpayers.
-WITHHOLDING TAXES COLLECTED AT IMPORT STAGE:
All of these should be converted into ADJUSTABLE TAX against actual liability instead of MINIMUM TAX which is a flawed concept.
For Raw Materials, Intermediates and Machinery attracting tax rate of 5.5%, tax rate should be reduced to 2%.
Commercial Importers of Raw material pay WHT @2.0% up to 5.5% which can only be possible if the Gross Profit is 30%, while the
margin is not more than 2 to 3% on raw materials sold without value addition or change in form. WHT paid on raw materials under
PART III of 12th Schedule be made adjustable against actual tax liability on self-assessment basis. OR be treated in FTR.
1. Remove distortions and complexity in Income Tax regime and increase reliance on Direct Taxes rather than Indirect Taxes.
BENEFIT
2. Restore credibility of system and confidence of tax-payers through a fair taxation regime.
SEC. 140. Recovery of tax from persons holding money on behalf of a taxpayer. — (1) For the purpose of recovering any tax due by
a taxpayer, the Commissioner may, by notice, in writing, require any person –
ISSUE (a) owing or who may owe money to the taxpayer; or
(b) holding or who may hold money for, or on account of the taxpayer;
This provision and further access to information on bank accounts under other provisions of law, have been counter-productive and
OUTCOME led to a flourishing cash economy. Many innovative ways have been evolved by businesses similar to block-chain and a local hundi
system. Such provisions only affect the documented businesses while the entire undocumented sector is immune from such laws.
Access to bank accounts may only be limited to accounts of unregistered persons with unusually high amounts of transactions.
PROPOSAL Commissioner should only be authorized to obtain information about the funds in accounts and to seek clarification as to the nature
of transactions and sources of funds. Such persons may be brought into the tax-net
1. Relief to the registered persons and restore confidence in banking system. Encourage official transactions.
BENEFIT 2. Bring unregistered persons into the tax-regime.
3. Stimulate economic activities and growth. Increase bank deposits which may be used for lending to industry.
Under SRO-1125/2011 Dated. 31.12.2011, commercial Importers are subject to 3% withholding Income Tax whereas Manufacturers
ISSUE are only subject to 1% withholding Income Tax. Prior to SRO-1125 / 2011 Dated. 31.12.2011 & SRO- 212(1) 2013 withholding Tax
was being charged at a uniform rate of 1% for more than Five years
PROPOSAL 1% withholding Income Tax for both Manufacturers & Commercial Importers is proposed.
1) A level playing field must be provided to both commercial Importers & Manufacturers and support to SMEs.
BENEFIT 2) Fake importers under the umbrella of Manufacturing units will be curtailed while commercial Importers cater to SMEs will
contribute more revenue.
AMENDMENT IN SEC 148. CHANGE FROM WHT TO MINIMUM TAX FOR COMMERCIAL IMPORTERS OF RAW MATERIALS
Commercial Importers of Raw material pay WHT @2.0% up to 5.5% which can only be possible if the Gross Profit is 30%, while the
margin is not more than 2 to 3% on raw materials sold without value addition or change in form.
ISSUE By amendment to Sec.148 of Income Tax Ordinance through Finance Bill 2018-19, WHT paid on import of raw materials by
commercial importers has been converted to MINIMUM TAX and the importers have been taken out of Fixed Tax Regime (FTR).
The concept of WHT is unique to Pakistan’s Tax regime which in fact is tantamount to putting the burden of tax-collection from
undocumented entities on the compliant tax payers and avoiding the responsibility to broaden tax-base.
OUTCOME After acquiring unprecedented powers to access information under Sec.56 A and 56 B in ITO, FBR and its subordinate departments
must take the responsibility to identify non-compliant and undocumented entities/persons instead of laying the onus on existing
taxpayers.
Commercial importers who are a major source of revenue will be able to resume their business and contribute to revenue as well
BENEFIT as promotion of SMEs.
Revenue collection through such recovery proceedings is hardly Rs.92.0 Billion whereas the costs due to litigation, involvement of
entire tax collection machinery and declining number of tax filers, is far more than the collection.
OUTCOME Multiple Audits under various provisions have eroded the trust of tax-payers in the FBR. RTOs and LTUs. Audit functions under
various Provisions have created confusion and complexity in Tax regime. Such provisions are also prone to misuse and a source of
harassment.
All Audit functions should be brought under one provision of Income Tax Ordinance rather than various over-lapping provisions
with clear and well defined parameters. Audit Parameters should be transparent and open to taxpayers.
Sub-Section 7 may be deleted.
PROPOSAL
Powers of the Commissioner and sub-ordinate officials should be curtailed to restore the trust of Tax Payers and encourage
broadening of tax-base. Such Audits should be restricted to specific queries or objections and call for relevant document only rather
than opening and re-opening a comprehensive audit every time.
Bring transparency and clarity to Audit functions and rules governing the same.
BENEFIT Prevent harassment to tax payers and abuse of powers by Inland Revenue officials.
Broaden tax base by restoring confidence in the system.
UNJUST APPLICATION OF WHT U/S. 236 G & H OF THE ORDINANCE MANUFACTURERS OF FMCGs
ISSUE UNJUST APPLICATION OF WHT U/S. 236 G & H OF THE ORDINANCE MANUFACTURERS OF FAST MOVING CONSUMER GOODS (FMCGs).
Manufacturers of electronics, sugar, cement, iron and steel products, fertilizer, motorcycles, pesticides, cigarettes, glass, textile,
beverages, paint or foam etc., collect advance tax @ 0.1% for filer (for non-filer 0.2%) & 0.5% for filer (for non-filer 1%) of gross of
amount of sale to distributors, dealers, wholesalers and retailers. At the time of sale.
Most of the goods mentioned above are not fast moving consumer goods. The only FMCG is beverages on which the section 236 G
OUTCOME & H are unjustly applied.
This tantamount to discrimination for beverage manufacturers being the only manufacturer of FMCGs manufacturer class liable to
above tax.
It is not practically possible for manufacturer of FMCGs to collect income tax from dealers, distributors, wholesalers and retailers
and it adds to the cost of consumer products.
The section may be appropriately amended to exclude the manufacturers of FMCGs from being collecting agents under section –
PROPOSAL 236 G & H of the Ordinance.
BENEFIT - To relieve the unjust burden of tax on consumer goods and enable manufacturers of FMCGs to pass the benefit to end-consumers.
Every year changes are made in Income Tax Form and ironically, it becomes more confusing and difficult for the tax-payers to fill. It is
ISSUE particularly cumbersome for the SMEs including individuals and AOPs.
1. Tax payers have to seek assistance from consultants and pay large amount of fee only to comply with the requirements of tax
return.
2. Due to the changes every year, tax-payers have to wait for the new form to be issued by the FBR which takes a month or two after
OUTCOME
the new budget is approved.
3. The complicated form only helps the business of Consultants and Tax practitioners at the expense of compliant tax-payers.
It is one of the reasons that many individuals prefer to stay out of tax regime and a deterrent to broadening of tax base.
1. Separate Income Tax Return forms for Companies, AOPs, Individuals and salaried class should be created.
2. Forms for SMEs and individuals and retailers should be a simple one page form both in English and Urdu.
3. Manual completion and filing should be allowed for individuals and SMEs in order to encourage documentation.
PROPOSAL
4. Extreme penalties and charges should be avoided in case of late filing.
Errors/short payment should be notified to registered person within two months of filing and correction of errors should be allowed
to tax-filer for up to 3 months of filing without requirement of commissioner’s approval.
- 1. Simplification of filing procedures and documentation.
BENEFIT - 2. Broadening of Tax base and increase in number of filers.
ANOMALY IN PCT CODE OF FERTILIZER /MANURE SPREADER S.NO.91 (SCHEDULE II, PART IV)
Income Tax Exemption under S. No. 91 (ii)(iv) of part IV of Schedule II of Income tax ordinance 2001 PCT code mentioned for Fertilizer
ISSUE or Manure Spreader is 8432.4000.
PROPOSAL As per tariff PCT code should be 8432.4100 for Manure spreader and 8432.4200 for Fertilizer distributor.
In Income Tax Exemption under S. No. 91 (ii) (iv) of part IV of Schedule II of Income tax ordinance 2001 needs to be corrected As per
BENEFIT tariff PCT code should be 8432.4100 for Manure spreader and 8432.4200 for Fertilizer distributor instead of 8432.4000.
8432.4100 & 8432.4200
ISSUE Tax deducted under Section 153 of ITO 2001 is levied on amount inclusive of Sales Tax which is tantamount to Tax over Tax.
It adversely affects those industries and trade which operate on thin margins and larger scale. Also such practice of tax ove r
OUTCOME tax is unfair.
PROPOSAL Substitute the word "inclusive" with "exclusive" in s. 153(7)(v)(a).
BENEFIT Rectify an obvious anomaly which is continuing for years and create a fair tax regime.
PROPOSAL Imports under H.S Code 4802 may also be granted the status as given to H.S Code 4810, whereby WHT of 2% is charged.
BENEFIT Import of paper will become affordable which benefit will be passed on to publishers and printers for their raw material.
Sales Tax on Industrial Machinery is 17%, if not locally manufactured; the importer can pay 10% cash and submit a postdated
ISSUE cheque for 7% in case of Industrial importer and a pay order or Bank guarantee if imported by commercial importer. These are
returned to the importers on production of Sales Tax Return, Annexure-B duly filled in showing as fixed assets.
OUTCOME This is a cumbersome and unnecessary procedure, consuming time and efforts of the importers as well as of government staff
All kinds of Industrial Machinery used in the production of goods may be exempted from Sales Tax if imported by manufacturers
PROPOSAL and if such machinery is not manufactured locally. Machinery imported by Commercial importers may be released on payment
of Sales Tax @10%.
All kinds of machinery whether imported by industry or commercial importers, ultimately is used in industrial production which
BENEFIT helps in growth and employment generation.
PROPOSAL Highest slab of income tax be reduced to 20% for commercial importer as well as small companies.
Currently, minimum tax on distributors of Pharmaceuticals, FMCG and cigarettes is 0.25%. However, the withholding rates on
ISSUE
Pharma and cigarette is 1% and FMCG is 2% which are too high.
OUTCOME Rates of WHT on Cigarette and FMCG is too high in view of the volume of trade and low margins.
Distribution is a high turnover business with low margins. It is proposed to bring down the WHT rates in line with minimum tax
PROPOSAL
which is 0.25% on all products.
The relief sought will improve economic progress and more job opportunities and create balance in the distributor’s business
BENEFIT
model
The Commissioners already have various powers to carry out amendments of the income tax returns filed for any tax year by the
taxpayer under Section 122 (5A). Therefore, additional audit powers outside the Standard Audit Parameters are often misused
OUTCOME by the tax authorities. Multiple and overlapping discretionary powers are precisely the hurdle in broadening of tax base, and
corruption. Rather than focusing on broadening the tax base, FBR is coming up with novel ways to perpetuate a regime of
extortion and harassment. Consequently the country is going nowhere in expanding the tax base and revenue collection.
The audits under Section 177 & 214C should be carried out once in every 3 years as was introduced through Finance Act 2018,
through restoration of clause 105 omitted in Finance Act’ 2019. Despite of this restriction the Commissioner can carry out
PROPOSAL assessment u/s. 122(1)/(5) or 122(5A) on the definite information or where declaration of tax payer is erroneous and prejudicial
to the interest of revenue.
BENEFIT Alleviate fears of compliant tax-payers. Removal of harassment and extortion through uncalled for and unnecessary audits.
STAY OF RECOVERY BY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) UNDER SECTION 128 (1A) OF ITO 2001
Currently the Commissioner (Appeals) grants stay for 15 days only and after expiry of the stay the taxpayer has to file repeated
ISSUE extensions until the decision of the Appeals. Relevant Sections are: ITO 2001 Section 128 (1A)
OUTCOME This is a cumbersome process which is quite unnecessary and causes undue hardship
Amendment be made to Section 128 (1A) of the ITO 2001, to increase the stay duration to Ninety (90) days instead of 15, and
PROPOSAL extend order timeline to 180 days instead of the existing 30 days
BENEFIT - This will eliminate unnecessary documentation and save time of both the taxpayer and the Commissioner (Appeals)
Currently Appellate Tribunal grants stay of 30 days or 60 days and after expiry of the stay the taxpayer has to file repeated extension
ISSUE until the decision of the Appeal. Relevant Sections are: ITO 2001 Section 131 (5)
OUTCOME This is a cumbersome process which is quite unnecessary and causes undue hardship
PROPOSAL Amendment be made to Section 131 (15) of ITO 2001, to automatically grant a stay till the date of the decision of the Appeal.
BENEFIT - This will eliminate unnecessary documentation and save time of both the taxpayer and the Appellate Tribunals
TIME LIMIT PROVIDED IN SECTION 161 OF THE ITO FOR MONITORING OF WITHHOLDING TAXES
As per Sections 174 of the ITO the taxpayer is required to maintain accounts and documents of six years after the end of tax year
ISSUE to which they relate. However no time limit is prescribe in section 161 of the ITO for monitoring of withholding tax. Relevant
Sections are: Income Tax Ordinance Section 161
As no time limit is prescribed for monitoring of withholding tax, taxpayers are receiving notices for periods beyond six years for
OUTCOME which they are not obliged to maintain records. Further field officers force on recovery from withholding agents despite the fact
that the person from whom tax was to be withheld has already discharged his tax liability
To impose time limit of 1 year from date of filing of WHT statement for passing an Order under sections 161/ 205 of the Income
PROPOSAL Tax Ordinance 2001. Time limit should also be provided in Section 161 of the ITO for monitoring of withholding taxes.
Presently there is 5% Customs Duty and 2% Additionally Duty on import of Cotton Yarn, while the Government has recently
ISSUE removed the Regulatory Duty of 5% on request of Exporters.
This has created artificial shortage of availability of yarn, rendering the Value Added Textile Exporters uncompetitive in the global
OUTCOME market against regional competing countries. This will lead to decline in exports as local industries are hurting and closing down.
Further Garment Stitching Units are not allowed to import Yarn under DTRE.
It is proposed that whenever Government desires to impose regulatory duty on import of cotton yarn, the Government should
also impose regulatory duty on export of cotton yarn and there should be time limit / duration of imposition of duty.
It is proposed that for manufacturer-cum-exporters duties on import of Raw Materials and Intermediate goods for re-exports
PROPOSAL should be 0%.
Alike, Zero Duties on import of cotton, the Government should allow DUTY FREE IMPORT OF COTTON YARN to facilitate the Value-
added Textile Industry.
Yarn is essential raw material to manufacture value added textile products for export, hence, it must be available in required
BENEFIT quantity and reasonable prices.
It has become very difficult for the legal importers to compete in the market and to suffer huge losses and due to these regulatory
OUTCOME duties unethical imports find it attractive to go for under-invoicing and creating huge problems for the legal & ethical importers
Therefore it is proposed that Regulatory Duties on food items in consumer packing must be withdrawn. Current tariff rates
must be rationalized to a reasonable level as in spite of SRO.237 most of the supermarkets are filled with goods in English &
PROPOSAL
other language labels Instead of the mandatory requirement of Urdu labeling.
BENEFIT 1. Discourage smuggling of food items in finished consumer packing and reduce consumer prices.
2. Increase in revenue by allowing legitimate import and curb under-invoicing.
The Imports under H.S Code Chapter 48 be treated as Raw Material or Semi-Finished Goods and therefore must be assessed to
PROPOSAL lower import duty rates to support local printing industry and reduce cost of educational books as well.
The reduction in cost due to lower import duty rates will make this raw material for books and packaging affordable, for the
BENEFIT domestic as well the export industries resulting in competitiveness in exports and relief to the common man.
ADDITION OF OPTICAL FIBER CABLES (PCT NO. 8544.7000) AND TELEPHONE CABLES (PCT NO. 8544.4910) IN SRO
211(1)/2009, DATED 05-03-2009, SCHEDULE XXIV, FOR REPAYMENT OF CUSTOMS DUTIES
Under S.R.O. 211(I)/2009 Dated 05-03-2009 Schedule XXIV for the repayment of custom duties, Power Cables are available,
ISSUE however, Optical Fiber Cables (8544.7000) & Telephone UG Cables (8544.4910) are not present for duty drawback which we are
exporting from Pakistan for last several years.
Industry is facing difficulties in Export Orders due to International competition with smaller delivery timelines. As per the DTRE
rules {SRO 450(I)2001 Dated 18-JUNE-2001 – AMENDMENT SRO 506(I)/2007 Dated 09-JUNE-2007}, the procedure to avail the
OUTCOME DTRE is very exhausting due to which at times while our case was under verification, either cause us Late Deliveries charges or
Cancellation of Order.
To incorporate the following in S.R.O. 211(I)/2009 Dated 05-03-2009 Schedule XXIV for the repayment of custom duties
applicable from the issued date of 5th March 2009.
PROPOSAL
1. Optical Fiber Cables – OFC (8544.7000)
Telephone / UG Cables – UG (8544.4910)
There is good potential for Exports of above-mentioned products and additional support through duty structures the local
BENEFIT manufacturers, more opportunities will be created to participate in International Tenders and enhance exports
PROPOSAL
Also, to exclude the above industrial raw materials from the preview of additional custom duties vide SRO 670(I)/2019.
If local industry will get the support by lowering the custom duties for local manufacturers, cable industry has potential to cater
BENEFIT all the IT / Telecom requirements saving the valuable foreign exchange and increasing the exports. With this support for domestic
industry we can substitute the imports.
Concurrent levy of FED and Sales Tax on manufacturing constitutes double taxation resulting increased cost of production rendering the
vulnerable industries uncompetitive and encourage smuggling.
OUTCOME In addition to these indirect tax and duty, beverages are also subject to advance income tax under Section – 236G and 236H of the
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Further, income of such manufacturers of beverages are also subject to Normal Corporate and Super Tax.
Federal Excise Duty on manufacturing should be phased out as the Federal Excise Law is outdated and it has been commitment of
PROPOSAL successive Governments to abolish this colonial era tax.
This would not only enhance Competitiveness of the industries, expand the tax base & registered / documented economy and discourage
BENEFIT smuggling but would also result in growth and increase the investment.
Excessive FED is charged on supply of beverage concentrate and beverages. Currently, concentrate is chargeable to FED @ 50% ad
OUTCOME valorem being highest rate of FED under Federal Excise Act, 2005. Whereas beverages are charged to FED @ 11.5% on retail price.
Beverages are also subject to General Sales Tax on retail price and Income Tax at the time of supply.
FED on beverages was reduced from 12% to 6% through Finance Act 2011 without corresponding reduction in rate of FED on beverage
PROPOSAL concentrate. Rate of FED may be reduced on beverage concentrate from 50% to 25% and on beverages from 11.5% to 5% as beverage
are not anymore a luxury item and is consumed by all income groups.
Reduced FED would give relief to the manufacturers from excessive burden of taxes and would reduce extra cost of business of
BENEFIT beverages. This would help to reduce consumer prices and increase consumption.
As per Section – 12 (4) of Federal Excise Act, 2005, goods which are chargeable to FED on retail price, FED shall be paid on the retail
OUTCOME price fixed by the manufacturer, inclusive of FED itself. This means the FED is also charged on FED, hence, raising cost for
manufacturers.
Provision of aforesaid section shall be amended to its post 2007 position to avoid irrational charge of FED on FED as under every
PROPOSAL taxation law tax is not included in price to calculate the said tax such as custom duty or sales tax is not included for the purpose of
calculation of custom duty or sales tax.
By such much needed and rational amendment, FED would be charged as per canon of justice and only once on the value excluding
BENEFIT the duty like custom duty and sales tax. This would remove additional burden on manufacturers and end consumers.
Through Finance Act, 2019 5% FED is levied on Fruit Juices. In addition to FED, Juices are already subject to Sales Tax @ 17% on
OUTCOME Retail prices.
Fruit Juices are consumed by Kids as source of energy for them and are not luxury products. The imposition of FED has unnecessarily
PROPOSAL created additional cost for end consumers.
Position prior to Finance Act, 2019 shall be revived by abolishing FED on Fruit Juices. This would increase the investment in the
BENEFIT sector that would generate tax revenue.
Name of Proposing Individual / Existing rate of duty Proposed rate of duty Suggested to be changed through SRO or in
S. No. PCT code Description Proposed PCT code Brief justification/ rationals for Change Quantify benefit to Consumer/ Industry
Association / Chambers 2020-2021 2021-2022 Tariff
6813.2010 7014.0010
8301.2010 8409.9110
8413.3040 8421.3110
Smuggling cannot be stopped at borders instead can be completely curb by making
8483.1013 8483.4012
All Pakistan Motorcycle Spare custom duty Tariffs as rational as 20% so that all the goods coming into country
8484.8020 8544.4221 Due to higher custom duties and Taxes total impact on Cost becomes 85.5% which is the main reason for
2 Parts Importers & Dealers Motorcycle spare parts 6813.2010 7014.0010 8301.2010
35% 8409.9110 8413.3040
20% 8421.3110 8483.1013Tariff
8483.4012 8484.8020 8544.4221 8536.5021 8511.2010 8511.3010 8511.8030 8512.2010 8512.3010 8714.1020 8714.1030 8714.1040 8481.8020 through customs can be convert from black economy into documented which is 5
8536.5021 8511.2010 smuggling,underinvoicing,misdeclaration khappe and corruption in the country,
Association Times higher. Countries without smuggling improve the taxes due to lower custom
8511.3010 8511.8030
Tariffs and Taxes
8512.2010 8512.3010
8714.1020 8714.1030
8714.1040 8484.8020
High Tariff is only affecting imports and boosting smuggling, affecting genuine imports and reducing revenue to
exchequr. Japan and European origin bearings are already very expensive and high Valuation Ruling affects
Pakistan Automobile Spare Parts Change in Tariff will bring better results, bring smugglers to enter into import regime,
5 5% Our request is to change the duty in Tariff Reduce customer, due to high price, customers shift to low quality bearings and that can be threat to industry and life. In
Importers and Dealers Association 8482.1000 to 8482.8000 OTHERS 8482.1000 to 8482.8000 11% Increase Exchequer's Revenue, Reduce Importer's Cost, and also lead to reduce
to Single digit Abolish AST & ACD order to support industry and end consumer, CD shall be reduced to 5%.
(PASPIDA) price to Customers.
Bearings are not manufactured in Pakistan.
If bearing Valuation is lowered, it will end smugglers' charm and all business will be via legal channel.
6 BEARING PARTS-JAPAN - -
8482.9100, 8482.9910, 8482.9100, 8482.9910,
8482.9990 8482.9990
7 BEARING PARTS CHINA - -
BEARING HOUSING
WITHOUT
8 8483.309 8483.3090 20% 5%
INCORPORATING BEARING-
JAPAN/CHINA
Page 1 of 11
Name of Proposing Individual / Existing rate of duty Proposed rate of duty Suggested to be changed through SRO or in
S. No. PCT code Description Proposed PCT code Brief justification/ rationals for Change Quantify benefit to Consumer/ Industry
Association / Chambers 2020-2021 2021-2022 Tariff
A). Fabric made from Artificial / Synthetic Yarn is used by common man and has become expensive & out
of reach. B).
Rising input costs like utilities and labour is another cause of high costs. A). Our weavers can compete in International Markets. B).
11 % CD + C). High tariff & high Import cost has rendered the exports of Fabric made from Artificial / Synthetic un- Common people will be provided Fabric in the local Market at competitive prices.
9 5402-4600, 5402-4700 Same 7% & No ACD SRO or Tariff
2 % ACD competitive. D). The recent withdrawal of Custom Duty C). Local Textile Industry will be stimulated. D). More jobs
on Cotton and manmade fibers, under SRO 48(1)/2018 was aimed to protect the local fabric industry therefore will be created in the industry
same preference should also be given to the imported Polyester Filament Yarn by a reducing the Custom Duty
to 7%
5202-1000, 5402-1900, A). Fabric made from Artificial / Synthetic Yarn is used by common man and has become expensive & out
5402-2000, 5402-3300, of reach. B).
5402-3400, 5402-3900, Rising input costs like utilities and labour is another cause of high costs. A). Our weavers can compete in International Markets. B).
11 %
5402-4800, 5402-4900, 11 % CD + C). High tariff & high Import cost has rendered the exports of Fabric made from Artificial / Synthetic un- Common people will be provided Fabric in the local Market at competitive prices.
10 Same & No SRO or Tariff
5402-5200, 5509-1100, 2 % ACD competitive. D). The recent withdrawal of Custom Duty C). Local Textile Industry will be stimulated. D). More jobs
ACD
5509-2100, 5509-3200, on Cotton and manmade fibers, under SRO 48(1)/2018 was aimed to protect the local fabric industry therefore will be created in the industry
5509-5100, 5509-5200, same preference should also be given to the imported Polyester Filament Yarn by a reducing the Custom Duty
5509-5300, 5510-1100 to 11%
A). Fabric made from Artificial / Synthetic Yarn is used by common man become expensive & out of reach. A). Our weavers can compete in International Markets.
B). Rising input costs like utilities, Labour is another cause of high costs. B). Common people will be provided Fabric in the local Market at competitive
11 5509-2100, 5509-5100 Same 2% RD 0% RD C). High tariff & high Import cost has rendered the exports of Fabric made from Artificial / Synthetic un- prices. C). Local Textile Industry will be stimulated.
Pakistan Yarn Merchants competitive. D). Polyester Spun Yarn is basic Raw Material for Knitting & Weaving D). More jobs will be created in the industry. E). Positive
Association Industry and there is no reason for imposed 2% RD on basic Raw Material of Spun Yarn. impact on the Current account Trade deficit.
A). Fabric made from Artificial / Synthetic Yarn is used by common man become expensive & out of reach.
B). Rising input costs like utilities, Labour is another cause of high costs.
C). High tariff & high Import cost has rendered the exports of Fabric made from Artificial / Synthetic un- A). Our weavers can compete in International Markets.
competitive. D). Chapter 54 of (Polyester) under H.S. Code 5402-3300 & 5402- B). Common people will be provided Fabric in the local Market at competitive
5402-3300, 2.5%
12 Same 0% RD 4700, 80% requirement of the local weaving & Knitting Industry is met by Chinese & Malaysian suppliers. An prices. C). Local Textile Industry will be stimulated.
5402-4700 RD
average of 7% of Anti Dumping has been imposed by National Tariff Commission since 26.08.2017 for 5 years. D). More jobs will be created in the industry. E). Positive
Now, the duty / tax structure on the import of finish goods (fabrics) is lower than its Raw Material i.e. Polyester impact on the Current account Trade deficit.
Filament Yarn. The entire cascading system of Polyester Chain is destroyed and is discriminatory to the local
fabrics manufacturing industry.
5% Our Fabric made from Viscose generally made for exports. HighTariff rate on Viscose Filament Yarn @ 5% will
13 5403-3100, 5403-3200 Viscose Filament Yarn Same 0% CD
CD make our Industry un-competitive
Coconut Fatty Acid Distillate / 16% & 0% Malaysia, Rate of Duty 5%, ACD
19 3823.1930 Primary Raw Material not produced Locally -
Coconut Acid Oil 5% Indonesia 2%, I.TAX 2%
Page 2 of 11
Name of Proposing Individual / Existing rate of duty Proposed rate of duty Suggested to be changed through SRO or in
S. No. PCT code Description Proposed PCT code Brief justification/ rationals for Change Quantify benefit to Consumer/ Industry
Association / Chambers 2020-2021 2021-2022 Tariff
24 PAKISTAN TEA ASSOCIATION 902.402 BLACK TEA 902.402 11+2 (%) 5(%) TARIFF SAME LEVEL PLAYING FIELD FOR THE WHOLE INDUSTRY. AND TO STOP SMUGGLING ACTIVITIES ENSURES PERFECT COMPETITON AND INCREASES IN GOVT. REVENUE
SECONDARY HOT ROLLED Imposition of regulatory duty on all imports irrespective of the importer status and
33 7208.271 7208.2710 6% 0% TARIFF abolition of above mentioned SRO’s will generate revenue of about PKR 100 billion
STEEL
which currently accounts for a big loss as this relief is given to few entities only, such
type of duty was not levied even when Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (PSMC) was
In the Finance Act 2020 regulatory duty was reduced of Hot Rolled Alloy Steel from 17.5% to 11% HS code
34 7208.279 PRIME HOT ROLLED STEEL 7208.2790 6% 0% TARIFF operational i.e. duty protection is there for private sector industries only, however
7225.3000 and Hot Rolled Non Alloy Steel from 12.5% to 6% HS code 7208 but on 7209 Cold Rolled Steel and
such a benefit was never given to national corporations and industries.
7210 Galvanized and other coated steel there was no reduction made, however all of these of industrial raw
On the other hand, if this is completely removed on all items, the raw material cost
materials as no steel can be used in the imported form unless or until it is further processed in an industry using
KARACHI IRON & STEEL SECONDARY HOT ROLLED for the industry would reduce to much extent, which would benefit the construction
35 7208.361 7208.3610 6% 0% TARIFF machineries. Most of these imported not produced locally have RD imposed on it, however they are
MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION STEEL sector as well as many other sectors and our exporters would also benefit from it as
not luxurious/non-essential items, moreover only 3-4 entities are given relief of the same under SRO.
their cost of production would reduce.
565(I)/2006 & its amendment via SRO. S.R.O.606(I)/2015, namely International Steels Limited, Aisha Steel Mills
The importers of such materials whether on industrial or commercial basis sector,
36 Limited and Hadeed Pakistan Ltd, which causes billions of losses to national exchequer every financial year, it is
7208.369 PRIME HOT ROLLED STEEL 7208.3690 6% 0% TARIFF both will get a treatment of equality as this has also given industrial importers an
therefore proposed to be removed on all imports, if not, it should be imposed on those whom are given relief.
edge over commercial importers which also causes loss to the national reserve, as
after all steel imported goes into the industry at first stage before being utilized
SECONDARY HOT ROLLED anywhere.
37 7208.371 7208.3710 6% 0% TARIFF
STEEL
Page 3 of 11
Name of Proposing Individual / Existing rate of duty Proposed rate of duty Suggested to be changed through SRO or in
S. No. PCT code Description Proposed PCT code Brief justification/ rationals for Change Quantify benefit to Consumer/ Industry
Association / Chambers 2020-2021 2021-2022 Tariff
SECONDARY COLD
55 7209.151 7209.1510 5% 0% TARIFF
ROLLED STEEL
SECONDARY COLD
57 7209.161 7209.1610 5% 0% TARIFF
ROLLED STEEL
SECONDARY COLD
63 7209.251 7209.2510 5% 0% TARIFF
ROLLED STEEL
SECONDARY COLD
65 7209.261 7209.2610 5% 0% TARIFF
ROLLED STEEL
SECONDARY COLD
67 7209.271 7209.2710 5% 0% TARIFF
ROLLED STEEL
SECONDARY COLD
69 7209.281 7209.2810 5% 0% TARIFF
ROLLED STEEL
SECONDARY COLD
71 7209.901 7209.9010 5% 0% TARIFF
ROLLED STEEL
Page 4 of 11
Name of Proposing Individual / Existing rate of duty Proposed rate of duty Suggested to be changed through SRO or in
S. No. PCT code Description Proposed PCT code Brief justification/ rationals for Change Quantify benefit to Consumer/ Industry
Association / Chambers 2020-2021 2021-2022 Tariff
SECONDARY GALVANIZED
73 7210.111 7210.1110 5% 0% TARIFF
AND OR COATED STEEL
SECONDARY GALVANIZED
75 7210.121 7210.1210 5% 0% TARIFF
AND OR COATED STEEL
SECONDARY GALVANIZED
77 7210.201 7210.2010 5% 0% TARIFF
AND OR COATED STEEL
SECONDARY GALVANIZED
79 7210.301 7210.3010 5% 0% TARIFF
AND OR COATED STEEL
Imposition of regulatory duty on all imports irrespective of the importer status and
SECONDARY GALVANIZED abolition of above mentioned SRO’s will generate revenue of about PKR 100 billion
81 7210.411 7210.4110 5% 0% TARIFF
AND OR COATED STEEL which currently accounts for a big loss as this relief is given to few entities only, such
type of duty was not levied even when Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (PSMC) was
In the Finance Act 2020 regulatory duty was reduced of Hot Rolled Alloy Steel from 17.5% to 11% HS code
operational i.e. duty protection is there for private sector industries only, however
PRIME GALVANIZED AND 7225.3000 and Hot Rolled Non Alloy Steel from 12.5% to 6% HS code 7208 but on 7209 Cold Rolled Steel and
82 7210.419 7210.4190 5% 0% TARIFF such a benefit was never given to national corporations and industries.
OR COATED STEEL 7210 Galvanized and other coated steel there was no reduction made, however all of these of industrial raw
On the other hand, if this is completely removed on all items, the raw material cost
materials as no steel can be used in the imported form unless or until it is further processed in an industry using
KARACHI IRON & STEEL for the industry would reduce to much extent, which would benefit the construction
machineries. Most of these imported not produced locally have RD imposed on it, however they are
MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION sector as well as many other sectors and our exporters would also benefit from it as
SECONDARY GALVANIZED not luxurious/non-essential items, moreover only 3-4 entities are given relief of the same under SRO.
83 7210.491 7210.4910 5% 0% TARIFF their cost of production would reduce.
AND OR COATED STEEL 565(I)/2006 & its amendment via SRO. S.R.O.606(I)/2015, namely International Steels Limited, Aisha Steel Mills
The importers of such materials whether on industrial or commercial basis sector,
Limited and Hadeed Pakistan Ltd, which causes billions of losses to national exchequer every financial year, it is
both will get a treatment of equality as this has also given industrial importers an
therefore proposed to be removed on all imports, if not, it should be imposed on those whom are given relief.
edge over commercial importers which also causes loss to the national reserve, as
PRIME GALVANIZED AND after all steel imported goes into the industry at first stage before being utilized
84 7210.499 7210.4990 5% 0% TARIFF
OR COATED STEEL anywhere.
SECONDARY GALVANIZED
85 7210.501 7210.5010 5% 0% TARIFF
AND OR COATED STEEL
SECONDARY GALVANIZED
87 7210.611 7210.6110 5% 0% TARIFF
AND OR COATED STEEL
SECONDARY GALVANIZED
89 7210.691 7210.6910 5% 0% TARIFF
AND OR COATED STEEL
SECONDARY GALVANIZED
91 7210.702 7210.7020 5% 0% TARIFF
AND OR COATED STEEL
SECONDARY GALVANIZED
93 7210.901 7210.9010 5% 0% TARIFF
AND OR COATED STEEL
Page 5 of 11
Name of Proposing Individual / Existing rate of duty Proposed rate of duty Suggested to be changed through SRO or in
S. No. PCT code Description Proposed PCT code Brief justification/ rationals for Change Quantify benefit to Consumer/ Industry
Association / Chambers 2020-2021 2021-2022 Tariff
Customs Duty 11%, if this item also used by other sectors then it should be included in FIFTH
95 2915.2100 Acetic Acid 5% To reduce the cost of manufacturing of Textile Industry
Add. Cus. Duty 2%, SCHEDULE TO THE CUSTOMS ACT 1969 for textile sector
Other (KNITTING MACHINE Customs Duty 20%, Knitting machine oil is used in knitwear export sector. Considering Knitwear Garment industry as one of top if this item also used by other sectors then it should be included in FIFTH
101 2710.1999 3%
OIL or NEEDLE SINKER OIL) Add. Cus. Duty 7%, value addition sector. Please note the duty on import of spin oil used by spinning sector is 3 %. SCHEDULE TO THE CUSTOMS ACT 1969 for textile sector
Page 6 of 11
Name of Proposing Individual / Existing rate of duty Proposed rate of duty Suggested to be changed through SRO or in
S. No. PCT code Description Proposed PCT code Brief justification/ rationals for Change Quantify benefit to Consumer/ Industry
Association / Chambers 2020-2021 2021-2022 Tariff
Our export sector will benefit with reduced duty rates and local industry for school bags, tents will start relying on
109 5903 COATED MATERIAL 20% 11% TARIFF imported goods rather than purchasing cheap smuggled material available in market. Also this will create many AVERAGE 250000 KGS IMPORT IN MONTHLY BASIS
jobs as local made goods will be able to subtitute imported finished school bags.
TABBA TEX / KARACHI LINING
COATED
Our Export garments (Leather and Jackets) sector will benefit with reduced duty rates and local industry for
110 5407.61 LINING MATERIAL 16% 11% TARIFF leather coats, overcoats and Jackets will start relying on imported goods rather than purchasing cheap AVERAGE 120000 KGS IMPORT IN MONTHLY BASIS
smuggled material available in market.
Fiber Reinforced If local industry will get the support by lowering the custom duties for local manufacturers, cable industry has
113 Premier Cables 3916.9000 Plastic/Glass Reinforced CD 5% & ACD 7% 0% potential to cater all the IT / Telecom requirements saving the valuable foreign exchange and increasing the
Polypropylene exports. With this support for domestic industry we can substitute the imports.
Page 7 of 11
(II) CHANGES IN RULES/PROCEDURES Annex - II
Name of Proposing Individual / Brief Justification/ Rationale for Proposed Change, if any, required in the Act, other
S. No. Existing rules/procedures alongwith SRO/CGO No & date Suggested Change Position after suggested Change
Association / Chambers Change SRO or Rules to Implement this Proposal
SRO 450(I) 2001/18-June-2001: Chapter XII; Sub Chapter 7. Duty and The input goods acquired under this sub-chapter shall be utilized in the manufacture and export
Tax Remission for Export.Rule these are cumbersome .These need to be of output goods within Twenty four months from the date of approval of DTRE application or IGM
Rule No 305 may be amended. Utilization period
simplified. All the whole process needs to made on line, including date,which ever is later.Provided that the ulilization period of packaging materials for horticulture Utilization period of twelve months is very short,in view of
of inputs may be restored to two years as SRO.450 (I) 2001/18th June 2001, in S.No
2 DFB Gypsum Industries application of DTRE, its approval input Output ratio determination ,and
before.Processes of Rule 300,301,302,303,304
products shall be Twenty four months.Provided further that the said period may be extended by dharnas,strikes, lockouts, long festival hoildays and
300,301,302,303,304,305.
submission of documents after utilization of materials in exports,release the Chief Collector of respective jurisdication in case of exceptional circumstances and in case Saturdays closures.
may be made on line and may be time bound.
of security deposit for DTRE approval. All the processes may be time of extension such fresh securities as mentionedin rule 300 covering the exxtension period shall
bound. be obtained.
IMPORTER IS ALREADY PAYING HEAVY TAXES, AND THIS ACTIVITY IS NOT AN OFFICAL LAW BY
INV.ATTESTATION CHARGES GONE IN THE POCKETS THE GOVT. OF PAKISTAN. SO IT SHOULD BE
4 PAKISTAN TEA ASSOCIATION INVOICE ATTESTATION IT SHOULD BE REMOVE EASE IN CUSTOM CLEARENCE
OF PAK. CONSULATE IN KENYA WHICH THEY MIGHT REMOVE TO AVOID CORRUPTION AND
NOT SHOWED TO PAKISTAN GOVT. MALPRACTICES.
Page 8 of 11
(III) CHANGES IN CUSTOMS ACT, 1969 Annex - III
(Customs Agent Licensing ) SRO 450, (I) /2001 Dated 18-06-2001 Presently, more than 3100 Licences have been issued by the Licensing MCC-
It is suggested that certificate of participation in mandatory course may be issued by the Rule 96 (d) Certificate of participation (onces in every two years or onces
Rule , 96 of Chapter VIII (d) Certificate of participation (onces in every two years) in A (West) and it is quite difficult to carry out Six Days Mandatory course due
1 DGT once in every two years or once in every five years subject to the renewal period of in every five years) in mandatory course from Directorate General of As per Rule 95(10) license are renewed for two years as well as five years.
mandatory course from Directorate General of Training and Reasearch (Customs , Sales for all customs agents licensed by MCC with in stipulated time because DGTR
licences. Training and Reasearch (Customs , Sales Tax,and Federal Excise).
Tax,and Federal Excise). is also engaged in other activities of training of staff.
It is requested that proviso of para 3 of Section 32 of Customs Act 1969 may kindly be
In proviso of para 3 o f Section 32 of Customs Act 1969 (IV of 1969) Provided that if the Provided that if the recoverable amount in case is less than one hundred
considered to be amended, as no action shall be taken against the trader (importer / Keeping in view the devaluation of Pak rupees and current rate of inflation twenty
3 recoverable amount in case is less than twenty thousand rupees the custom authorities shall thousand rupees the custom authorities shall not initiate the aforesaid
exporter) if recoverable amount of duty and taxes is not more than 100,000.00 (one thousand rupees has less significance.
not initiate the aforesaid action. action.
hundred thousand only)
Due to the current nature of business environment and very high tariff of ports,
In para 3 of Section 179 of Customs Act The cases shall be decided within
In para 3 of Section 179 of Customs Act 1969 (IV of 1969) The cases shall be decided within terminals and shipping companies if a case is not decided within 30 days and the goods
It is requested that the period specified to decide the cases should be thirty working days thirty working days of the issuance of show cause notice or within such
ZAHID BASHIR CHOUDHRY Ninety days of the issuance of show cause notice or within such period extended by the are lying in the port area the cost of doing business will significantly increase. An
5 instead of existing period i.e. 90 days and further the extended period should be 15 days period extended by the collector for which reason shall be recorded in
collector for which reason shall be recorded in writing, but such extended period shall in no estimated cost Rs.15000 to 20000 per day can be incurred on a single 40ft container.
instead of existing 60 days. writing, but such extended period shall in no case exceed fifteen working
case exceed sixty days Therefore to reduce the cost of doing business and trade facilitation the cases should be
days
decided within 15 working days.
In Section 203 of Customs Act 1969 (IV of 1969) Wharfage or Storage fees: Currently all terminal operators are charging wharfage and storage fees after 05
Wharfage or Storage fees: The collector of custom may from time to time fix the period after the calendar days from the berthing of vessel, which is indeed a huge loss of foreign
The collector of custom may from time to time fix the period after the expiration of which expiration of which goods left in any custom -house, custom area, wharf or exchange because almost all of the container terminal operators are foreign entities.
Rules may be drafted and then must be notified in SRO 450(I)2001 to govern the section
6 goods left in any custom -house, custom area, wharf or other authorized landing place or other authorized landing place or part of the custom-house premises, shall Further due to law and order situation / COVID-19 pandemic and other holidays,
203 of Customs Act 1969.
part of the custom-house premises, shall be subject to payment of fees, and the amount of be subject to payment of fees, and the amount of such fees in accordance sometimes the consignments are not lifted from the terminals within 05 days hence
such fees.{As provided under the rules prescribed by the board}. with the rules. Collector of Customs may be empowered to notify the free period of storage fees from
time to time under Section 203 of Customs Act
Page 9 of 11
Name of Proposing Individual /
S. No. Existing Section / Clause of the Act requiring amendment Suggested Amendment Position after suggested Change Brief Justification/ Rationale for Proposed Change Impact, if any, on any SRO/ Rules
Association / Chambers
st
In the 1 Schedule of Customs Tariff Laptop computer, notebooks and Personal Such as 8471.3011 - - - -Laptop computers, notebooks whether or not
9 Computers and specified under PCT code 8471.3010 and 8471.3020. In order to clear A separate PCT code is should be created for computers with or without SIM card incorporating multimedia kit. 8471.3012 - - - - with sim card functionality. NOC from PTA should not be required for Laptop, notebooks and personal computer
the goods from Customs under said HS codes an NOC is required from Pakistan functionality. 8471.3021 - - - - Personal Computer. 8471.3022 - - - - with sim card that are not equipped with SIM card functionality.
Telecommunication Authority (PTA). functionality
As per HSEN 2017 ambulances are defined under para (2)(b) of Hs code 87.03 page #
st XVII-8703-2. Therefore a new sub-heading may be created in Pakistan Custom Tariff i.e.
10 In the 1 Schedule of Customs Tariff no PCT code is specified for Ambulance. Insertion of new PCT code for ambulance under main heading of 87.03. PCT code 8703.9010
8703.9010. Since Ambulances are used for welfare purpose hence custom duty at the
rate of 5% is proposed.
Condition IV of the preamble of Part 1 of the 5th Schedule of Custom ACT “For "Respective
This condition is confusing because it does not apply to tariff headings which already have
ZAHID BASHIR CHOUDHRY Headings" entries in column (3) of the Table against which more than one rate of customs This condition is confusing because it does not apply to tariff headings which already
3% statutory rate of custom duty. Hence only one rate of custom duty should be Condition IV of the preamble of Part 1 of the 5th Schedule of Custom ACT
11 duty has been mentioned in column (4), the rate of 0%, 3% or 11% shall be applicable only th
have 3% statutory rate of custom duty for example serial # 3,4,5 etc. have more than
mentioned against serial numbers of the 5 schedule for tariff headings where more should be omitted th
for such goods which are chargeable to 3% or 11% duty under the First Schedule to Customs one rate of customs duty mentioned in the 5 schedule.
than one rate of custom duty is mentioned.
Act, 1969.”
In 5TH Schedule Part 1 Table S.No. 22 sub serial (i), SMD/ LED/LVD Lights with or without PCT Code 9405-1030 is also related with light fittings with LED/SMD lights therefore
12 One more PCT code should be inserted i.e. 9405.1030 9405.103
Ballasts, fittings and fixtures are given the benefit of 5th Schedule. should be inserted in 5TH Schedule Part 1 Table S.No. 22 sub serial (i) as per tariff.
In 5TH Schedule Part 1 Table S.No. 22 sub serial (ii), SMD/ LED/LVD Lights with or without PCT Code 9405-4020 is also related with light fittings with LED/SMD lights therefore
13 One more PCT code should be created i.e. 9405.4020. 9405.402
Ballasts, PV module fittings and fixtures are given the benefit of 5th Schedule. should be inserted in 5TH Schedule Part 1 Table S.No. 22 sub serial (ii) as per tariff.
In 5TH Schedule Part 2 Table B S.No. 13, (i) Dextrose Pharmaceutical Grade and
In 5TH Schedule Part II Table B S.No. 13 duty is 5% and in the 5TH Schedule Part II Table
(ii) Dextrose (injectable) PCT code 1702.3000 attracting duty 5%.
14 Both tables of Part II of 5th Schedule i.e. Table B and C needs synchronization C S.No. 01 duty is 10% . This creates a disparity between tables of the same schedule for
However In 5TH Schedule Part 2 Table C S.No. 01, Dextrose (injectable grade and pharma
the same goods
grade) PCT code 1702.3000 is attracting duty 10%.
Add. Custom Duty Has Been Imposed On Tea From Past 12-14 Years. A.C.D/R.D Is
Usually Imposed For Temporary Purpose But On Tea It Was Never Lift Up Or Reduced
Increase in Govt. Revenue / Reduction in Retail Price for Consumer/ Helps Lowers Retail Prices For Consumers With Availability Of Good Quality. Give
15 PAKISTAN TEA ASSOCIATION Add Custom Duty (RD) Should Be Lift Up From Past Several Years. It Will Help Tea Industry To Flourish And Reduce In Price For
in Job Creation Relief To Traders And Packers And Creates Jobs
Consumers. As It Is a Common Man Drink So It Should Be Considered As Essential
Element of Our Nation
Page 10 of 11
2. Details of Imported Raw Materials:
Annual Qty. Cost/ Unit of Production as % of total C & F Value in Rate of Customs If Imported Under any SRO
S. No. Input material's Description PCT Head UOM Qty/Unit Produced Rate of Sales Tax Other Duties & Taxes Alternative use of this item, if any
Consumed cost of Input Material USD/ Rs. Duty
SRO No. Duty (%)
Tabba Tex
Un-Coated Woodfree A-4 4802.56 KGS 0.62 USD 850 0.2 0.17 0.155 Photocopies,Leaflets
Un-Coated woodfree Rolls 4802.699 KGS 0.62 USD 770 0.2 0.17 0.155 Books,Copies & Brochures
Un-Coated woodfree Sheets 4802.57 KGS 0.62 USD 800 0.2 0.17 0.155 Books,Copies & Brochures
2/S Coated writing Paper 4810.191 KGS 0.62 USD 780 0.2 0.17 0.155 Magazine , Books
Packaging Board 4810.92 KGS 0.62 USD 750 0.2 0.17 0.155 Foodgrade Boxes , Export Materisal
Packaging Board 4810.99 KGS 0.62 USD 750 0.2 0.17 0.155 Foodgrade Boxes , Export Materisal
Self Adhesive Sticker 4811.41 KGS 0.62 USD--- 0.2 0.17 0.155 Printer Sticker
Page 11 of 11