Tom Lane wrote:
> Another problem is that it's very debatable whether users (as opposed
> to developers) want a fast release cycle. Some of that reluctance to
> update might dissipate if we had a better upgrade-in-place story, but
> by no means all of it. People don't want to have to retest their
> applications every six months.
>
>
>
Or even more than once every few years. This is a consideration that is
often ignored in our discussions, unfortunately.
cheers
andrew
