jamesinswansea
Joined Sep 2012
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings89
jamesinswansea's rating
Reviews12
jamesinswansea's rating
Star Trek Section 31 is an abomination to everything the Star Trek franchise stands for. From the moment it begins, it feels less like a continuation of a beloved universe and more like a sad attempt to cash in on the Star Trek name. Where's the depth? The intrigue? The thoughtful commentary on society that we expect from a Star Trek film.
Let's talk about the script, or rather, the lack thereof. It's painfully obvious that the writers had no idea what they were doing. The plot is a disjointed mess that lacks direction or purpose. Every scene feels like it's just a series of random events strung together, with zero emotional weight. The dialogue is forced and awkward, making it almost impossible to care about the so-called stakes. It's as though the writers have forgotten what made Star Trek great in the first place-intelligent storytelling with a human touch. Instead, we're stuck with a script that reads like it was written by someone who has never seen an episode of the show.
Then there's the acting, which is a whole new level of painful. Characters deliver lines with all the emotional depth of a cardboard cutout. It's like watching a group of people reading their lines off a cue card, without any genuine passion or understanding of the material. The lead Michelle Yeohs performance is particularly grating, managing to take every opportunity to make us cringe, rather than investing any real feeling into their role. It's not just wooden-it's downright awkward.
Finally, where is the Star Trek spirit? Section 31 is the furthest thing from the optimistic, exploratory, and thought-provoking essence of the franchise. Instead of boldly going where no one has gone before, this show stumbles along with tired tropes, lazy world-building and characters who could barely pass for paper-thin. This is a hollow imitation of the Star Trek we've all come to love, a far cry from the shining beacon of hope and exploration that made Star Trek iconic.
Star Trek Section 31 is a disgrace to the legacy of Star Trek. It's poorly written, horribly acted, and worst of all, it's not Star Trek. Do yourself a favour and skip this trainwreck-it's not worth your time. Not even for the first 10 minutes.
Let's talk about the script, or rather, the lack thereof. It's painfully obvious that the writers had no idea what they were doing. The plot is a disjointed mess that lacks direction or purpose. Every scene feels like it's just a series of random events strung together, with zero emotional weight. The dialogue is forced and awkward, making it almost impossible to care about the so-called stakes. It's as though the writers have forgotten what made Star Trek great in the first place-intelligent storytelling with a human touch. Instead, we're stuck with a script that reads like it was written by someone who has never seen an episode of the show.
Then there's the acting, which is a whole new level of painful. Characters deliver lines with all the emotional depth of a cardboard cutout. It's like watching a group of people reading their lines off a cue card, without any genuine passion or understanding of the material. The lead Michelle Yeohs performance is particularly grating, managing to take every opportunity to make us cringe, rather than investing any real feeling into their role. It's not just wooden-it's downright awkward.
Finally, where is the Star Trek spirit? Section 31 is the furthest thing from the optimistic, exploratory, and thought-provoking essence of the franchise. Instead of boldly going where no one has gone before, this show stumbles along with tired tropes, lazy world-building and characters who could barely pass for paper-thin. This is a hollow imitation of the Star Trek we've all come to love, a far cry from the shining beacon of hope and exploration that made Star Trek iconic.
Star Trek Section 31 is a disgrace to the legacy of Star Trek. It's poorly written, horribly acted, and worst of all, it's not Star Trek. Do yourself a favour and skip this trainwreck-it's not worth your time. Not even for the first 10 minutes.
The new Quantum Leap series has been met with mixed reviews from critics and fans alike. As someone who watched the original series I was looking forward to seeing this.
Some have praised the show's new cast and its attempts to modernize the classic premise, while others have criticized its lack of originality and its failure to capture the magic of the original series.
One of the most noticeable differences between the new and old Quantum Leap is the absence of the iconic theme tune. The original theme tune was a catchy and upbeat piece of music that perfectly captured the tone of the show. The new show's theme tune, on the other hand, is more generic and forgettable. Why would you not update this fantastic series music which made it unique? Would it hurt to get Ben to say "Oh boy" for old time sake!!
Another major difference is the disappearance of the waiting booth. In the original series, the waiting booth was the device that Sam Becketts person he leaped into was held. The new show does not feature a waiting booth at all, and it is unclear how Ben Song (Raymond Lee) is able to leap into a person if this is no longer in the new show??
The acting in the new Quantum Leap series is also a mixed bag. Raymond Lee is a charismatic lead actor, but the supporting cast is generally average and wooden. The show's writing is also uneven, with some episodes being well-written and others being forgettable.
Overall, the new Quantum Leap series is a missed opportunity. The show has lost the charm and originality of the original series, and it fails to capture its magic. The lack of the theme tune and original material has been lost, while the show is not terrible, it is certainly not as good as the original.
If you are a fan of the original Quantum Leap series, I would recommend skipping the new one. It is simply not as good.
Some have praised the show's new cast and its attempts to modernize the classic premise, while others have criticized its lack of originality and its failure to capture the magic of the original series.
One of the most noticeable differences between the new and old Quantum Leap is the absence of the iconic theme tune. The original theme tune was a catchy and upbeat piece of music that perfectly captured the tone of the show. The new show's theme tune, on the other hand, is more generic and forgettable. Why would you not update this fantastic series music which made it unique? Would it hurt to get Ben to say "Oh boy" for old time sake!!
Another major difference is the disappearance of the waiting booth. In the original series, the waiting booth was the device that Sam Becketts person he leaped into was held. The new show does not feature a waiting booth at all, and it is unclear how Ben Song (Raymond Lee) is able to leap into a person if this is no longer in the new show??
The acting in the new Quantum Leap series is also a mixed bag. Raymond Lee is a charismatic lead actor, but the supporting cast is generally average and wooden. The show's writing is also uneven, with some episodes being well-written and others being forgettable.
Overall, the new Quantum Leap series is a missed opportunity. The show has lost the charm and originality of the original series, and it fails to capture its magic. The lack of the theme tune and original material has been lost, while the show is not terrible, it is certainly not as good as the original.
If you are a fan of the original Quantum Leap series, I would recommend skipping the new one. It is simply not as good.
Justified: City Primeval is the latest instalment in the acclaimed Justified series, which has garnered a dedicated fanbase over the years. While it certainly delivers on the promise of more of the gritty, crime-riddled world of Raylan Givens, it falls short of the high bar set by its predecessors, primarily due to its somewhat lackluster character development.
The series brings us to Detroit, where Deputy U. S. Marshal Raylan Givens (Timothy Olyphant) once again finds himself embroiled in a web of deceit, corruption, and violence. The storytelling remains as sharp as ever, with well-paced narratives and a dose of dark humour that fans of the original series will appreciate.
One of the standout aspects of Justified: City Primeval is undoubtedly Timothy Olyphant's portrayal of Raylan Givens. His charisma and rugged charm still shine through, and he continues to be the anchor that holds the series together. His interactions with the various criminals, old acquaintances, and newcomers to the show are a joy to watch, providing moments of tension and wit that harken back to the series' glory days.
However, where City Primeval falters is in its supporting characters. Unlike the richly developed characters we've seen in the past, some of the new additions feel one-dimensional and uninspiring. In previous seasons, the show thrived on complex, morally ambiguous characters, but here, they often come across as mere plot devices rather than fully fleshed-out individuals.
The absence of some beloved characters from the earlier seasons is also noticeable and leaves a void that's challenging to fill. Fans who grew attached to characters like Boyd Crowder and Ava Crowder will find the new cast of villains and allies to be somewhat lackluster by comparison.
Despite these character-related shortcomings, Justified: City Primeval still manages to provide a solid dose of entertainment. The writing and dialogue remain sharp, and the tension between Raylan and his adversaries is palpable. The show's gritty, rural atmosphere is as authentic as ever, adding to its unique charm.
In conclusion, Justified: City Primeval is a good addition to the series, but it doesn't quite reach the heights of its predecessors. While the return of Raylan Givens and the familiar setting are welcome, the lack of compelling supporting characters makes it fall short of the brilliance that fans of the original Justified series have come to expect.
It's worth watching for die-hard fans of the show, but newcomers may want to start with the earlier seasons to truly appreciate the magic of Harlan County.
The series brings us to Detroit, where Deputy U. S. Marshal Raylan Givens (Timothy Olyphant) once again finds himself embroiled in a web of deceit, corruption, and violence. The storytelling remains as sharp as ever, with well-paced narratives and a dose of dark humour that fans of the original series will appreciate.
One of the standout aspects of Justified: City Primeval is undoubtedly Timothy Olyphant's portrayal of Raylan Givens. His charisma and rugged charm still shine through, and he continues to be the anchor that holds the series together. His interactions with the various criminals, old acquaintances, and newcomers to the show are a joy to watch, providing moments of tension and wit that harken back to the series' glory days.
However, where City Primeval falters is in its supporting characters. Unlike the richly developed characters we've seen in the past, some of the new additions feel one-dimensional and uninspiring. In previous seasons, the show thrived on complex, morally ambiguous characters, but here, they often come across as mere plot devices rather than fully fleshed-out individuals.
The absence of some beloved characters from the earlier seasons is also noticeable and leaves a void that's challenging to fill. Fans who grew attached to characters like Boyd Crowder and Ava Crowder will find the new cast of villains and allies to be somewhat lackluster by comparison.
Despite these character-related shortcomings, Justified: City Primeval still manages to provide a solid dose of entertainment. The writing and dialogue remain sharp, and the tension between Raylan and his adversaries is palpable. The show's gritty, rural atmosphere is as authentic as ever, adding to its unique charm.
In conclusion, Justified: City Primeval is a good addition to the series, but it doesn't quite reach the heights of its predecessors. While the return of Raylan Givens and the familiar setting are welcome, the lack of compelling supporting characters makes it fall short of the brilliance that fans of the original Justified series have come to expect.
It's worth watching for die-hard fans of the show, but newcomers may want to start with the earlier seasons to truly appreciate the magic of Harlan County.