enjay_
Joined May 2004
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews3
enjay_'s rating
This show is poor. Really poor. The 'comedy' is awful, the presenter - yes Mr Spade, you - is uninteresting and pathetically dull, and quite frankly anyone who likes this show simply doesn't have any idea of what decent comedy is.
Spade is unanimated - he reads off the autocue like he's reading a book with the intention of putting you to sleep. If there was a bit more life in his presenting then maybe their would be more to enjoy - once they've brought in a new writer also.
Bottom line is this. The sooner this pile of useless rubbish is taken off the air, the better.
Spade is unanimated - he reads off the autocue like he's reading a book with the intention of putting you to sleep. If there was a bit more life in his presenting then maybe their would be more to enjoy - once they've brought in a new writer also.
Bottom line is this. The sooner this pile of useless rubbish is taken off the air, the better.
I read the book - just like everybody else - and so when i went to see this movie, given all the bad reviews id heard about it, i was fearing the worst. Most of the reviews complain that all the actors do is just stand around talking, and that, although i guess is right, is not a problem at all if your actually listening to what they're talking about.
For me, personally, it's the first half that's the problem. The film starts off as if its already in the middle of the plot, with everyone in there current situations around the globe all visited in the first few minutes. This prevented us getting to know the characters, there was no build up to the main events of the film - they were happening from the second the title came up.
For me, the beginning needed to be a lot slower. More attention should have been paid to introducing Langdon to us instead of him getting involved in things 5 minutes into the film. From the second he was at the Louvre, everything seemed to going so quickly - they were solving clues in record times and it just seemed, well, too scripted - there was no real pause for thought.
But once that first half of the jungle that is the book is cleared, the characters find themselves at Teabings house, and from this moment on the film is great. It keeps you gripped, interested in what is happening, and as far as i can recall (i read the book a year ago) stuck pretty closely with the book barring a few selected omitted parts.
Its this intriguing second half of the film that gets my votes. Id buy the DVD when it comes out. If the first half were slower (such as more time taken for the opening scene in the book at the Louvre, Langdons conference thing, and, well, basically all the parts in the Louvre after that), this film would have been excellent and everything id hoped for. Some things are even explained better in the film than they are in the book.
Whether the director or the editor is to blame for these discrepancies we shall never know. But Ron, i was expecting a little more care be put into the flow and pacing of this story.
For me, personally, it's the first half that's the problem. The film starts off as if its already in the middle of the plot, with everyone in there current situations around the globe all visited in the first few minutes. This prevented us getting to know the characters, there was no build up to the main events of the film - they were happening from the second the title came up.
For me, the beginning needed to be a lot slower. More attention should have been paid to introducing Langdon to us instead of him getting involved in things 5 minutes into the film. From the second he was at the Louvre, everything seemed to going so quickly - they were solving clues in record times and it just seemed, well, too scripted - there was no real pause for thought.
But once that first half of the jungle that is the book is cleared, the characters find themselves at Teabings house, and from this moment on the film is great. It keeps you gripped, interested in what is happening, and as far as i can recall (i read the book a year ago) stuck pretty closely with the book barring a few selected omitted parts.
Its this intriguing second half of the film that gets my votes. Id buy the DVD when it comes out. If the first half were slower (such as more time taken for the opening scene in the book at the Louvre, Langdons conference thing, and, well, basically all the parts in the Louvre after that), this film would have been excellent and everything id hoped for. Some things are even explained better in the film than they are in the book.
Whether the director or the editor is to blame for these discrepancies we shall never know. But Ron, i was expecting a little more care be put into the flow and pacing of this story.
