cweeks262
Joined Mar 2003
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews2
cweeks262's rating
I'm not a movie critic, but I had to write this one up simply because it impressed me as being something Hollywood has utterly forgotten how to make (or maybe never did). A more than not likely story of a fading Elvis in a resthome meeting a black guy who either is JFK or thinks he's JFK, we don't ever really know and its irrelevant anyways. What is important is that a 4,000 year old mummy has escaped from his sarcophogus (and the curse that bound him) and is now preying on the residents of the rest home that JFK and Elvis have ended up at. Between witty writing and a few suspenseful (not really scary) moments, this meandering story drew me in from the beginning. While the story seems to meander, it had to in order to explain how these icons of the 20th century ended up at a rest home fighting a mummy on the loose. Saw it with a big crowd at the Alamo Drafthouse so that made it all the better, although the laughter in a few scenes drowned out subsequent dialogue. Guess I'll have to buy the DVD.
These are stellar performances by John Cusack and Noah Taylor. The story draws you in such that when the movie abruptly ends, you want to see and hear more. What were Hitler's influences? Was he a product of his environment? Without a doubt, Hitler was an angry man when returning from WWI to nothing. Many were in the same boat. Anti-semitism was alive and well long before Adolf took it and carried it to the extent that he did. And Hitler, like many others, found solice in nationalism.
One criticism of this movie was its depiction that Hitler had developed his emotional oratory skills at a young age. The historical accounts (Shirer's Rise and Fall of the Third Reich) seemed to indicate that he didn't really find his speaking voice until later. This was 1918 and Hitler is only 29 or 30 years old.
Also, the scene where Taylor riles up an auditorium full of Germans with an anti-semitic speach didn't fit with the rest of his portrayal of a timid, weak-minded, lost-soul, young Hitler. This scene seems to defy the rest of the image of Hitler we are given.
This is not to criticize Noah's portrayal. It is absolutely stunning. He had to have spent hours watching footage of Hitler in action.
This movie leaves you wanting more information. What else made him become the monster presented in the textbooks?
It is unfortunate that the Academy could not pay more attention to the performances in this movie, as both Taylor and Cusack both deliver. I believe that Hollywood has a fear of treading anywhere close to this subject matter except to deliver stereotypical portrayals of the historical people and events.
One criticism of this movie was its depiction that Hitler had developed his emotional oratory skills at a young age. The historical accounts (Shirer's Rise and Fall of the Third Reich) seemed to indicate that he didn't really find his speaking voice until later. This was 1918 and Hitler is only 29 or 30 years old.
Also, the scene where Taylor riles up an auditorium full of Germans with an anti-semitic speach didn't fit with the rest of his portrayal of a timid, weak-minded, lost-soul, young Hitler. This scene seems to defy the rest of the image of Hitler we are given.
This is not to criticize Noah's portrayal. It is absolutely stunning. He had to have spent hours watching footage of Hitler in action.
This movie leaves you wanting more information. What else made him become the monster presented in the textbooks?
It is unfortunate that the Academy could not pay more attention to the performances in this movie, as both Taylor and Cusack both deliver. I believe that Hollywood has a fear of treading anywhere close to this subject matter except to deliver stereotypical portrayals of the historical people and events.