Reviews

353 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Alien's greatest hits...
18 August 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Anyone who knows me personally knows that I am a massive, MASSIVE Alien fan. I've seen all the films countless times, own loads of memorabilia, video games, comics, books and art collections. I even have a tattoo of big chap on my arm! So suffice to say I was really, REALLY looking forward to Alien: Romulus. I even had a countdown on my notice board to release date, and that wait was AGONISING! It's been over a decade since I last looked forward to a film this much, and today - I finally saw it. So, what did I think?

Usually I like to keep my reviews as spoiler free as possible, but it's hard to critically assess this film without talking about it in detail, so I have decided I will do a quick spoiler free summary... before going into a spoiler filled breakdown. You have been warned...

SPOILER-FREE REVIEW

Alien Romulus follows a group of young adults who live a pretty rough life on a mining colony called Jackson Star. They long to escape the dark and depressing colony and search for a better life, but the Wayland-Yutani corp keep extending their work contracts, making it impossible to leave. Rain and her synthetic brother Andy are the latest duo to be refused permission to leave, so join up with their friends to explore a space station that has recently entered the planet's orbit. Hoping that the station houses some cryo sleep pods that will allow them to travel to the next star system, the station proves to be full of dark secrets and deadly abominations. They quickly find themselves fighting for not only their freedom, but also their lives...

Where to even start with this. The first thing I want to say is how great everything looks. They built real sets, used miniatures for the ships and a lot of the creature work was done practically... and that makes a world of difference. Everything looks tangible, which goes a long way for a film like this (save for a few wonky bits of cgi) because the actors are reacting to things that are actually there. The performances were also pretty good by everyone involved, especially David Johnson - who played the android Andy to absolute perfection. The androids are an aspect that the Alien films always seem to get right, and this is no different.

The story is... ok. It makes sense and doesn't have any noticable issues or plot holes... despite being somewhat derivative. There are also a few cool scenes involving facehuggers (the facehuggers are an aspect that I feel are woefully underused in this IP, and it was nice to see them get a bit of lime light), and a zero gravity section near the end that was also pretty awesome.

Any negatives? The film does lean pretty heavily into paying homage to past films and ideas, which is fine... but when it starts directly using quotes from other films I personally find this a bit off putting. Its like the film is a 'greatest hits', without it's own identity. Ghostbusters Afterlife had the exact same problem, in its quest to appease long time fans it was filled with so many call backs and 'member berries' that it becomes distracting. I also absolutely DESPISED the final 15 minutes, for reasons I'll go into below...

Overall its a decent film which just about scratches that Alien itch us fans have had for a long time. It has some flaws, but makes up for it with some awesome set pieces and great performances. It's better than I feared it might be... but worse than I hoped it would be...

.

. .

WARNING: SPOILERS!!!!

. .

.

Ok, so the film opens up with Weyland-Yutani recovering Big Chap from the wreckage of the Nostromo. This has divided opinions among fans, but personally I think this is pretty cool, and I wish we got to see more of this aspect. Alas, it is confined to a pre-title sequence before shifting to the colony. Oh well...

The colony itself looks great, I have to say. It look grimy, gritty and full of people who are basically slaves to Weyland-Yutani. Hearing about the terrible working conditions makes you feel sorry for Rain and Andy, and gives a good reason for them to want to get off world. At this point of the film, Andy's behaviour is almost child-like, and seeing him get bullied and pushed around by other colonists succeeds in getting under the audience's skin. We are then introduced to the rest of our crew - Tyler, Kay, Bjorn and Navarro. The thing is, throughout the film these guys are not developed anywhere near as much as Rain and Andy are... which told me they were all going to die. I was right....

So, we fly off to this space station that has suddenly appeared in orbit to steal some cryo sleep pods. Ok, fine. Weird how there are no warnings about what went down on the station, or the fact nobody else seems bothered about it. You'd think W-Y would be there like a shot to recover their precious bio-weapons - their bus must have broke down or something. While searching for fuel for the cryo pods, half the group get locked in this lab with frozen facehuggers, while the other half find a damaged synthetic.... and this is where the film has it's first slip-up. This synthetic is the same model as Ash, complete with a digital recreation of the late great Ian Holm. The thing is... it doesn't look right. Humans are pretty good at reading body language and stuff, so a fake human needs to have some pretty spectacular CGI to fool the human brain into believing it. But this looks like a poor internet deep fake, and it's REALLY JARRING, especially against the awesome practical effects of the rest of the film. I get why they did it (instant audience suspicion), and you do get used to it... but... eesh...

Ash... sorry, I mean Rook tells the group about what happened at the station - namely they recovered Big Chap and reverse engineered him, allowing them to create facehuggers at will. However, Big Chap broke free and killed everyone. I'm sat there thinking tbh I'd rather see that than the rest of this film, but whatever. Navarro gets facehugged, Andy gets an upgrade and the group gets seperated again. I have to say that Andy's upgrade that transforms him into a W-Y droid is a brilliant bit of acting - now he's cold, calculated and efficient. There is also this really awesome scene where Rain, Tyler and Andy are creeping through a corridor infested with facehuggers... but they don't attack as the room is at body temp, meaning they are masked by the heat. This is when Alien Romulus is at its best - when it does something new and interesting.

Navarro gives birth to a Xeno, that kills Bjorn (by spitting acid all over him - nice!) and then hunts Kay. We then get a bit more back story about what they engineered here (namely the black goo from Prometheus), that they were trying to use as a super serum to improve humanity. There's some action scenes in a hive, where they rescue a captured Kay, but can't shoot the aliens as the acid blood will melt through the hull and decompress the ship. Solution? Turn the gravity off! Cue Rain shredding through tons of aliens in zero-g, their blood spraying everywhere... and her using the kick from her gun firing to avoid it. That is awesome! What's not awesome is Andy saying "get away from her you b@#$". No no no no... whhhyyyy?????

The film ends with them escaping with an injured Kay, but unbeknown to them she has injected herself with the black goo and is now heavily pregnant with our final monster. Urgh. I was not a fan of this at all. The newborn completely killed Alien Resurrection for me, and this 'newborn 2.0' doesn't fare much better. Looking like a cross between the newborn and an engineer from Prometheus, it looks terrible. I really don't like the whole human/xeno crossover angle that the lore goes into sometimes, and not only does this final act hurt the film, but Rain beats it in the exact same way as 4 OTHER FILMS - by blowing it out into space!!! Can they not come up with ANY new way to kill these things?

I left the cinema feeling a bit underwhelmed. It has some good moments for sure, but it concernes itself far too much with borrowing from previous films, instead of focusing on what it did best - new stuff. Oh, and for an Alien film the adult aliens got barely any screen time. The wait for an Alien film that can stand up to the first two continues...
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Under Paris (2024)
5/10
Poor Jaws clone
16 August 2024
Under Paris follows marine scientist Sophia who loses her crew to a shark attack while out in the field. Years later she re-locates to Paris, and discovers a local band of environmentalists who have picked up on the shark trackers she used to use. They discover a shark has managed to strand itself in the river Seine, but the local authorities aren't interested because a global sporting event is imminent and they don't want any compromises. You can probably guess how that turns out for them...

In many ways this film is emulating Jaws pretty hard. We have a shark expert and a police captain trying desperately to find and kill the shark, we have local authorites downplaying the danger in fear of losing money, and innocent bystanders become victims during the inevitable carnage that ensues. However, where Jaws is a masterpiece of tension, atmosphere, character building and set-pieces, this film... isn't. Being a French film I watched a dubbed version, and the problem with doing that is you inevitably lose some of the performance of the actors. Not helping matters is the English dialogue, which seems to have been written by a 5 year old. Rounding things off with incredibly annoying and stupid characters, a derivative plot and shark effects that are about as realistic as a plumbers estimate... I spent the whole film just wishing I was watching the almost 50 year old infinitely better film this is trying so hard to be. Cool bleak ending though...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't Breathe (2016)
8/10
A lesson in why crime doesn't pay...
12 August 2024
Don't Breathe follows 3 thieves - Rocky, Alex and Money (surely not their real names?) who make ends meet by breaking in to wealthy homes and stealing. Longing to make enough money to escape their abusive home lives and start afresh, their target becomes the house of a blind man who they know received a huge payout after a rich girl killed his daughter in a car accident. Thinking a blind man will pose zero threat, plus will probably have the cash stashed somewhere, they put their plan into action. They soon find out that not only is the guy a war veteran who has turned his house into a fortress, but he also houses some dark and disturbing secrets...

I have to say I thought this film was great. Taking an original premise and making not only the protagonists morally questionable, but also gradually turning the blind man from a helpless victim into, well... quite frankly a disturbing scum bag is a stroke of genius. The film has an awesomly grubby claustrophobic setting and effortlessly oozes atmosphere thanks to the fact that the blind man a) has highly attuned hearing... and b) knows his house inside-out. The slightest noise and he's right there, which makes him terrifyingly efficient, but yet can also be used against him. Add in a few curveballs that you genuinely don't see coming, and this film ticks all the right boxes for a frighteningly great time. Add in some great performanes (especially Stephen Lang as the blind man), and this film becomes extremely easy to recommend. Get it watched!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Sleepover (2020)
6/10
Decent enough for kids
11 August 2024
The Sleepover follows the Finch family, just a seemingly normal family living a normal life... until one night the parents are kidnapped when the kids are having a sleepover. They quickly come to the realisation that their mother isn't who they thought she was, and is actually a high profile jewel thief who was in witness protection. Can the kids follow the trail of clues left for them by their mother and save their parents before it's too late? This is a kids film, so you can probably guess...

Having a pre-teen daughter means I'm currently getting subjected to a lot of these "kid-focused" action movies with low stakes, heroic kids and comical bad guys that are purely designed to appeal to older kids who aren't quite old enough for proper violence yet. I must say though that this one isn't bad. There is just enough depth to the characters and performances to keep adults engaged, and the plot is actually fairly interesting considering the target audience. Aside from the massive suspension of disbelief required, just a few annoying characters and ridiculous set pieces hold this back from being genuinely good. As it is it will entertain your kids for a couple of hours, but you'll probably start getting itchy feet before the credits roll....
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Grown Ups (I) (2010)
3/10
Another Sandler turd...
11 August 2024
Grown Ups follows a bunch of childhood friends who reunite as 40-somethings after their school basketball coach passes away. Staying with their respective families in a lakeside lodge for the weekend, they get up to crazy hijinks, learn a lot about themselves and each other... and have the basketball remach of a lifetime.

Despite the somewhat stacked cast of talent on display here, this film did little to impress me. It's just typical low hanging fruit US comedy with cheap gags and slapstick humour. The script is uninspired, the gags aren't funny and the plot is non-existant. It feels like a buch of comedians just wrote a bunch of gags and stupid scenarios for these characters to bumble through for 90 minutes, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was exactly the case. Dull, boring and not funny. Next!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Forrest Gump (1994)
10/10
Heartwarming and endearing....
5 August 2024
Forrest Gump follows the life of simple yet endearing Forrest Gump, who is sat on a bench waiting for a bus. As people come and go he regails them with various tales from his quite frankly extraordinary life... all the way from him being a kid to the present day. Often coming across as borderline ridiculous, many people just disregard him as making stuff up... but is he? Or is he really as special and inspiring as he makes out....?

Yes, I know I'm very late to the party with this one, but suffice to say this film is, quite frankly, astonishing. Tom Hanks is incredible in the title role, as we see him get taken advantage of, go to war and not giving up on his injured captain... all while chasing his one true love Jenny. Yet, despite all his amazing achievements and success, he never gets what he truly wants - Jenny's love.

All the performances are incredible (especially Gary Sinise as Lieutenant Dan), the story is tragic, heartwarming, funny and engaging all at once... and the love story between Forrest and Jemny is guaranteed to pluck at the heart-strings of anyone who has ever had 'one that got away'. The special effects are convincing (seeing Forrest appear in archival footage) and the sets of the various different locations and time periods are just icing on the cake.

I think it's fair to say that Forrest Gump is absolutely phenomenal. It 100% deserves all of the awards it received and is utterly, utterly essential viewing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flash Gordon (1980)
8/10
Flash!!!! Ah-haaaaaa........
5 August 2024
Based off the comic of the same name, Flash Gordon concerns itself with the titular football hero, who during a flight crashes into the base of a mad Doctor who is convinced the end is nigh. Forcing both Flash and another survivor into a space rocket at gunpoint to escape Earth, the trio find themselves on planet Mongo, ruled by the evil Ming the Merciless. Ming is orchestrating an attack to annihilate Earth, so can Flash use his charisma and charm to rally the locals to take Ming down and save our planet?

This is one of those films I've been meaning to get around to forever, and now that I finally have I'm glad I did. It's very over the top, very silly, and everything is larger than life and bombastic. You can just tell everyone involved with making this had great fun doing so, and it's hard to resist the charm this film oozes. The sets look great, the costumes and characters are ott to the point of parody, and the soundtrack (by Queen) is genuinely amazing. It shouldn't work, but it does - and if you ever wanted to see a half naked flying Brian Blessed and Timothy Dalton dressed like something out of Peter Pan take on a ridiculous warlord in an even more ridiculous fortress to the cacophany of wailing electric guitars, then look no further. It's stupid and I loved it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
70's classic horror...
5 August 2024
The Wicker Man is a British horror classic, and follows Sgt. Neil Howie (Edward Woodward) as he is called to a mysterious island village in search of a girl that was reported missing. However, when he gets there none of the locals seem to know of the girl, not even her own mother. He suspects a cover-up. But why? As Neil's investigation progresses, bizarre rituals occur all around the island, and as Neil gets closer to uncovering the truth he realises the horrifying true reason for his visit...

These days The Wicker Man is notorious largely thanks to the awful Nic Cage remake, but this original 70's version has a lot to offer. The whole film has this creepy unsetting vibe with an eerie atmosphere that makes Neil seem so isolated, despite the film largely taking place in the open and during the day. That is quite impressive. All the performances are believable, the locations beautiful... and the ending I should imagine would have been quite shocking at the time, with a great twist that you really don't see coming. In some aspects it may seem a bit dated, but even so this is a true horror classic not to be missed...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strange way to end a trilogy...
4 August 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This third entry in David Gordon Green's self contained sequel trilogy picks up several years after Halloween Kills, and focuses on a teenage babysitter called Corey. While babysitting a somewhat problematic young lad, an accident occurs resulting in the lads death... and of course Corey gets blamed for it. Becoming an outcast and getting bullied by his peers, he finds solace in Allyson, Laurie Strode's grandaughter. However, Laurie can detect evil in him - the same evil present in Michael Myers... and as Corey becomes more and more deranged, Laurie begins to suspect he has become Haddonfield's new serial killer...

Remember how Halloween 3 tried to do its own thing but didn't quite pull it off? This film also (somewhat) takes that path... which is an odd choice for the final part of a trilogy, but I can roll with it. I like how Corey starts off as inoffensive and meek, but turns into this absolute nutcase as the film goes on. He seems to be channeling power from a weakened Michael Myers he finds in the sewers... but the film dabbles with the idea that Michael may or may not even be there, and I WISH this film had leaned more into that. Alas, Michael is real, and when (SPOILER) Corey commits suicide as a final screw you to Laurie (knowing Allyson will blame her for it) before wheeling Myers out for the final battle, you kinda get the feeling that the makers just didn't have the guts or confidence to see what this film builds up through to the end. So instead we have a film that spends 90% of its time following a kid's descent into madness, before throwing him in the bin to have Laurie vs Michael again to keep the fans happy. Urgh...

Halloween Ends was so close.... SO CLOSE, to trying something new and interesting... but instead we have 90 minutes of character arc that abruptly ends followed by an underwhelming fight that I, personally, by that point had no interest in seeing. Oh well, I suppose within the next few years we will get yet another reboot, or remake, or they will find a ridiculous way to bring him back (a la Resurrection), because it seems this franchise likes repeating itself ad nauseum....

And that brings my Halloween marathon to a conclusion. Finally. Some films were great (the original and 4), some were decent (H2O, 2 and 2018) and some had internet show hosts doing kung fu. I sincerly hope that whatever comes next can do something a bit different. Please!!!!!!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"Trick or treat, (insert profanity here)..."
4 August 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Bwahahahaha... oh good Lord, this film... where do I even start? This sequel to H2O follows an internet streaming company, ran by Freddie Harris (Busta Rhymes) who tries to make it big by live-streaming a bunch of teenagers spending the night in the abandoned Myers' house. Of course he intends to spice things up by leaving clues and traps around the place, and even dresses up as Myers for maximum ratings. However, when the real Myers turns up and starts murdering these unfortunate teens (who are locked in this house) the lines between what is real and what is entertainment begin to blur, and the fight to survive the night begins.

The concept of this film actually isn't too bad, and was quite forward thinking for the time (correctly predicting internet dominance and the popularity of live streams way before they were actually a thing). If it were it's own standalone film and they tidied it up... well...a lot - it may actually have been decent. However.... well wow, what a mess. They did that thing again - failing to follow through the previous film's ending, and then did the unthinkable by killing Laurie Strode in the opening. Things go downhill from there when we are introduced to Freddie - a manipulative sleaze-bag who binge watches kung fu and convinces this greatest hits of 90's teen actors into this ridiculous situation. They then fumble around this house for a while before the murders begin, all while another group of teens watch them online at a party.

I think its fair to say this is by far the worst film in the franchise. It is so stupid, so cliched, so so... ridiculous that it is impossible to take seriously. Imagine if Michael Myers appeared in American Pie 16 or whatever, that's what this feels like. I just couldn't stop laughing at the absurdity of it, and when Busta Rhymes declared "Trick or Treat, (expletive)" before using TV learned kung fu on Myers before electrocuting his groin... well I mean what else is there to say. I'm sure die-hard fans of the first film were sobbing into their hands by that point...

Would I recommend this film? Absolutely not. However, is it so bad its good? I'm not sure about that, but it is definitely so bad it's freakin' hilarious. If you are aware of what you are letting yourself in for, you could certainly have some fun with this. Thankfully, the series got better from here...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
So bad it's good? Sadly not...
4 August 2024
Well... this is a novel idea! Take a bunch of beloved kids characters and turn them into slasher villains! Bring it on!

Blood & Honey follows Christopher Robin, as he returns to his childhood home. Growing up with Pooh, Piglet and Eeyore, he eventually left to go to university, and now years later has returned to introduce his girlffiend to his childhood friends. Thing is, the gang were not able to fend for themselves, and ended up eating Eeyore just to stay alive. Growing to resent Christopher for leaving them and having to kill their friend to survive, Pooh and Piglet are now somewhat unhinged and very, very murderous...

This film was utterly decimated by critics upon release, but I wasn't put off as cheap shlocky horror movies never go down well with critics. I was completely on board with this concept and more than a little curious so I decided to check it out.

I really wanted to like this film, but boy does it make that difficult. I actually laughed out loud at how absolutely AWFUL the dialogue is. If you ever watch it, just listen to the lines Chris Robin's girlfriend says at the beginning! Who even talks like that!!!!? And it's not just her, nobody in this film talks like a real person. Yes, this film isn't the only one that suffers from bad dialogue, but DAMN... it's really jarring...

That aside, the film seems to be going for your typical Texas Chainsaw vibes... and Pooh and Piglet are so typecast as psychotic hillbillies that they could easily just be generic humans and it wouldn't matter. The fact that they are humanoid pigs and bears doesn't really serve much purpose in the film itself beyond the initial set up. They just look like humans wearing masks (which with a budget this low is probably exactly what they are).

Some pretty grim kills aside, this film doesn't really do anything that a billion other slasher movies haven't already done much better. The characters are all unlikable and have zero depth, the location is cliche and everyone is either dumb, annoying or both - including the killers. Amazingly, this film somehow got a sequel that is allegedly much better. Well... it can't be much worse...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Haven't we seen all this before???
30 July 2024
Serving as a direct sequel to Halloween (2018), this picks up right after the previous film ends. Laurie is on her way to hospital, and while en route she sees fire fighters rushing to her burning house. Scared that they may save Michael but being too weak to do anything about it, she continues to hospital. The fire fighters arrive and while fighting the fire find Michael in a metal cupbard that he used to escape the flames. Cue one of the best scenes in the series where Michael absolutely decimates the entire fire fighter squad, in slow mo no less with the burning Strode house serving as a backdrop. Awesome.

The focus of the film shifts to Karen, who tells Laurie that Michael died so she can rest, even though Karen suspects otherwise. During a reunion in a local bar with the survivors of the '78 film (complete with some of those original actors - nice touch!), it comes on the news that Michael Myers has escaped in a bus crash. This sends all of Haddonfield into a meltdown, with pretty much the whole town forming an out of control lynch mob who plan to take Michael down in numbers. The problem is, they don't know what he looks like now....

From here you can probably guess the rest. Laurie eventually finds out Michael survived, the lynch mob mistakenly kill an innocent man, and Michael slaughters lots, and lots... AND LOTS of people.

Despite on paper this film ticking all the right boxes, for some reason it falls a bit short. In many ways this feels like a cross between Halloween 2 and 4 (direct follow up, hospital setting, a lynch mob and a focus on Laurie's daughter) but it fails to properly follow through on any of its ideas. The mob killing an innocent man feels like some sort of contrived moral lesson that doesn't quite work, and Michael for whatever reason is straight up invincible. No way any man could survive the end of this film, and when he just gets up and slaughters about 30 armed people who have him surrounded... it almost feels like parody...

All in all, this film mostly gets the job done and is entertaining enough for what it is... but it's not as good as the film that preceeds it...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween (I) (2018)
8/10
Yet another reboot... 4th time the charm?
29 July 2024
After the less than stellar response to Rob Zombie's remake duology, where do we go from here? It's reboot time, yay! This new entry in the franchise serves as a direct sequel to the original '78 film (so this 'Halloween' is a sequel to the original 'Halloween', and not to be confused with the remake, which is also called 'Halloween'... jeez do you think you could make it more confusing?) and completely ignores all other entries. So, Jamie Lloyd? No. Cult of thorn? Thankfully, no. John Tate? No. Busta Rhymes kung fu-ing Michael Myers? Definitely not. None of that happened.

Instead we follow Laurie Strode, 40 years after her fateful encounter with deranged killer Michael Myers. Becoming obsessed with the fact that he may one day return, she is... for lack of a better term... troubled. She had a strained relationship with her daughter, Karen - and had her taken from her by child services when she was 12. Her daughter, now an adult, is trying to get her to forget Michael and live her life, but Laurie is having none of it, and spends most of her time locked away in her home which she has turned into a fortress.

Michael, however... has spent the last 40 years locked up and has said nothing and keeps to himself. One day when being transferred, the bus he is on crashes and he manages to escape. Cue a return to Haddonfield, lots of grisly murders... and Laurie being proved right....

At this point the Halloween series has been absolutely all over the place, in terms of both plot and quality, and this is the fourth time the series has been 'reset', as it were. Shockingly though, this film is actually quite good. It fits in with the style of the first film quite nicely, and having Jamie Lee Curtis back, (again) to reprise a tortured Laurie works out much better this time than it did with H2O - largely due to her being much stronger and more resourceful here than before. She has spent the last 40 years using her fear to build traps, train with weapons and basically become a badass. When Michael enters her house at the end its basically Home Alone but without the comedy.

Laurie aside though the supporting cast do quite well, Michael Myers is big and imposing without looking like a roided freak, and the plot takes some interesting turns, rounding things off nicely with a pretty cool ending.

All in all this is a solid entry in the franchise. It's obviously not as good as the original, but could happily jostle with part 2 and part 4 for second place.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween II (2009)
6/10
Disappointing follow-up...
27 July 2024
Following on from Rob Zombie's remake, Halloween II picks up some time after the events of that film and follows Laurie as she tries to come to terms with Michael killing her family. Now living with the Bracketts, she is constantly plagued by nightmares of Michael chasing her. Meanwhile, Dr. Loomis is attempting to sell a book about the whole ordeal, which poses its own moral dilemma. But when Michael returns and once again goes after Laurie, the bodies pile up and Laurie soon realises why Michael is targetting her...

I had a bit of an odd experience with this film. I bought it on blu ray, but the disc wouldnt work... so I got a refund and bought another copy... and that wouldn't work either! So I ordered the DVD (surely THAT would work), but it was going to take ages to arrive. So in the meantime I had a look around the various streaming platforms to see if I could watch it, but the only thing I could find was a fan edit on youtube (more on that later). Eventually it arrived so I finally got to watch it.

Despite some good performances, some gritty and brutal kills and a decent atmosphere, I have to say, this isn't as good as the previous film. It bogs itself down with all these bizarre 'vision' scenes with a child Michael, his dead mother and a horse that I suspect are supposed to be the driving force behind Michael's rampage... which, ok - fine... but when Laurie sees them as well and they begin to interact with the real world it all got a bit stupid for my liking.

And that nicely brings me onto that fan edit I mentioned. I did actually watch that prior to watching the DVD, and to my surprise it is MUCH better. Many scenes have been re-ordered, which makes the plot flow a lot better and all those stupid scenes have been either thrown in the bin or reworked. It's amazing how important the edit can be to the quality of a film. The fan edit would get a 7.

However, I am reviewing the officially released version of the film, and sadly it's a bit of a mess. It's not awful, but as the fan edit proved it could quite so easily have been better...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Derivative plot, but the action is pretty great...
27 July 2024
The first Ninja film didn't impress me much, but this follow up is definitely an improvement. Ninja: Shadow of a Tear follows American ninja master Casey Bowman, who loses his wife and unborn child after a home invasion. Vowing revenge Casey breaks plenty of limbs and faces tracking down the killer to a drug factory in Burma... before discovering a horrifying secret....

Derivative revenge plot aside, this film was actually pretty good. Scott Adkins was convincing in this role, and some of the fight scenes were genuinely awesome. I also didn't see the final twist coming, which is always a plus. Story wise we have seen all this before, but to be honest nobody watches a film like this for the plot. It has it where it counts - non-stop brutal beatdowns and great fights. You will know if this is to your taste or not...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Burning (1981)
7/10
Decent if unremarkable slasher...
27 July 2024
Another 80's horror... another camp slasher - The Burning follows a caretaker at a summer camp who after a prank going wrong results in him being severely burned. After some time recovering at hospital, he is eventually released... and what ensues is a murderous rampage as he makes his way back to the camp to take his revenge on the kids who almost killed him.

I found out about this after watching several youtube videos discussing great horrors that never got sequels, so I was looking forward to checking it out. The thing is, whereas this film does have some good kills and creepy scenes, it does feel a bit by the numbers. The characters are largely forgettable, and fulfill the horror trope of making questionable decisions. One interesting thing though is how nearly all of this film took place during the day, which is quite unusual for a horror film.

All in all, if you like slasher movies this gets the job done. It's very 80's in style, and the gore is hilarious in places, but it's not going to blow your mind or anything. Decent.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween (2007)
7/10
Decent remake
24 July 2024
After the frankly atrocious Halloween: Resurrection and a 5 year hiatus, the man in the Shatner mask is back in this effort by Rob Zombie, that serves as a complete reboot of the series.

Halloween '07 follows 10 year old Michael during some... difficult times. His mother is a stripper, his step dad is abusive, his older sister berates him constantly, and he is bullied at school. He has no friends, and the only shining light in this poor kids life is his baby sister, who he idolises. After a particularly bad episode of bullying at school, he finally snaps - luring one of his bullies out into the local woods before killing him in a fit of rage. Once home he then kills his step dad, his sister and her boyfriend, before getting caught and arrested. We then follow him as he grows up in a sanitarium, before breaking free and returning to Haddonfield to find his baby sister, killing anyone who gets in his way.

The original Halloween by this point was God-tier horror, so choosing to effectively remake it was brave and bold. And you know what? It's not half bad. Zombie has decided to shift the plot of the original film to the final act here, and give a bit of a back story to Myers, which nicely sets it apart from the original. The film looks good, with a grubby aesthetic that fits with the characters and the setting, and Myers is an absolute beast here, making his complete decimation of fools left right and center a bit more believable. He FEELS unstoppable, which makes him all the more dangerous. The performances are all pretty good, and of course, being Rob Zombie you know the soundtrack is going to deliver.

However, there are issues. One of the things that made the original Michael Myers so... captivating and unnerving was that he was just... evil. He murdered people because they were... there. There was no reason, no driving force, no previous trauma to make him do it, it was just pure unmotivated murderous carnage. This film gives a reason. It shows you WHY Michael Myers does what he does. It makes excuses for his behaviour. It even makes you feel a shred of sympathy for him... and I'm sorry but I don't want to feel pity for this guy. I want to FEAR him...

Also (and this is somewhat minor, but still) - Danielle Harris as Annie Brackett. Why???? Why would you cast the actress who played Jamie Lloyd in this film?? It may not have seemed like a big deal at the time, but if you marathon this series like I have just done, seeing a woman get her kit off who played a young kid only 3 films ago feels.... in bad taste, to say the least.

Still, it utterly wipes the floor with the previous film, and is a decent enough watch... with some pretty brutal kills and good performances. Sadly though, it can't hold a candle to the original film. It just doesn't have the atmosphere or intelligence of Carpenter's masterpiece. Sorry Rob....
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An improvement on the last two but still not quite there...
24 July 2024
Well, here we go again - it's Halloween time! This 7th installment wisely bins all that cult of thorn nonsense from the last few films, and serves as (another!) direct sequel to Halloween 2 - completely disregarding Jamie Lloyd as ever existing and picking up with a now very much alive Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) some 20 years after the events of Halloween 1 & 2. After faking her own death, changing her identity and going into hiding with her teenage son John (Josh Hartnett), Laurie (now going as 'Keri') is plagued by nightmares of Michael returning. Of course despite her best efforts for a new life, Michael tracks her down and of course goes on a rampage.

I was somewhat on the fence with this film. Yes - its definitely better than the last 2 films, and ignoring all of that stupid nonsense they introduced and going back to the first 2 films was a wise move. Jamie Lee Curtis, now 20 years older, I think is fair to say is a much better actress now, and really sells this broken version of Laurie Strode. Josh Hartnett was also pretty good (with this being his debut) despite his awful, AWFUL harcut (seriously, his barber needs sacking) and even the supporting characters were pretty good. The deaths were gruesome, Michael is actually creepy again, and the ending was pretty great.

The problem is... it just doesn't do enough to stand out. By 1998 horror movies had evolved, and this feels a bit too old school (pun intended) for it's own good, containing a predictable plot and zero surprises. Still, its decent enough and worth a watch if you like slashers...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Scraping the barrel somewhat...
24 July 2024
Several years after the events of Halloween 5, a now adult Jamie Lloyd escapes the cult she was being held captive by after giving birth to a child. Going on the run with the baby, eventually Myers catches up to her and takes her down... but not before she manages to hide the baby. Enter Tommy, the boy Laurie babysat in the original Halloween, who finds the baby. Together with relatives of the Strodes (who happen to now live in the old Myers' house), they must work together to protect this baby and find a way to take down Michael once and for all.

Does that synopsis sound awful? Yes, yes it does, and I can't get my head around how the makers of this film didn't see it too. Expanding on the cult of thorn plot (that was ALL BUT CUT from the previous film.... just... WHAT???), we have Myers chasing a baby (that may or may not be his - don't get me started...) killing a bunch of unremarkable fodder along the way. It was quite interesting seeing Paul Rudd in his big screen debut as Tommy, and sadly Donald Pleasence passed away during post production, with this being his penultimate film appearance. There were also some tense action scenes (if you can call them that... tense scenes? Stalking scenes? Whatever...) but that aside this film is completely forgettable. The next film would wisely reboot everything, so thankfully this cult of thorn nonsense ends here...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Disappointing follow-up to the awesome H4...
24 July 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Directly following on from the awesome part 4, Halloween 5 follows Michael, who was pulled from the river he was left for dead in and nursed back to health by a guy who lives in the middle of nowhere. After recovering, Michael murders the guy and sets off to find Jamie and kill her. Thing is, after stabbing her mother at the end of the last film, Jamie has been commited, and is now as good as mute. Also for... reasons, she now has a telepathic link to Michael. As Michael murders everyone close to Jamie while trying to find her, she realises she must work with Dr. Loomis to stop him once and for all.

I really enjoyed the previous film, so I was hoping this would be at least as good... but sadly it drops the ball in... most ways. It disappointingly doesn't follow up on the ending of 4, and instead renders one of our main characters mute, for some unfathomable reason. It then proceeds to kill the amazing Rachel from part 4, and replaces her with Tina... who is one of those dumb unlikable dimwits who is largely oblivious to what's going on around her. Why????? Jamie now has a telepathic link to Michael which serves minimal purpose, and Loomis is pretty much a straight-up a**ehole, tormenting Jamie through the first half and using her pretty much as live bait at the end. Psychologist? I think he needs to see one!

There is also this bizarre 'cult of thorn' thing going on, which was supposed to play a big part in the movie (explaining that Myers is part of this cult and has to kill his bloodline, hence why he's after Jamie), but it was mostly cut out at the last minute. This makes the film confusing and disjointed, as there is a mysterious man that appears every so often, but doesn't do anything, isn't introduced or explained... and breaks Michael out of jail at the end for reasons unknown. As is you are just left wondering wtf is happening. Apparently there is an alternate cut of the movie with most of this stuff put back in, but I doubt it can save the film from its other issues.

Overall this was a huge let down after Halloween 4. It's full of crap, stupid or irritating characters, the plot makes no sense, and it has an incomplete feel about it. Hopefully the next one will be better (spoiler:- it isn't...)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Decent course correction after the previous film
17 July 2024
After the divisive (to say the least) Halloween 3, part 4 does away with the anthology idea completely, brings back Michael Myers... and serves as a direct sequel to the second film. Question is, was that the right decision?

Several years after Halloween 2, it is revealed that neither Michael nor Dr. Loomis died in the fire. Both disfigured by the incident, Michael is being transferred between sanitariums when he learns that he has a neice - Jamie Lloyd, orphaned daughter of Laurie. Breaking free and escaping to track her down, once again Loomis is hot on his tail. Can Loomis stop Michael from hunting and killing an innocent child? You can probably guess, to be honest...

Despite being somewhat disappointed by the decision to abandon the anthology idea, all is forgiven pretty quickly as this film is awesome. It takes what worked with the original film, but adds some new elements. The target is now a child (which adds a bit more urgency to things), the townsfolk are no longer clueless and form a lynch mob, and the final girl, Rachel is likable and charismatic as she tries to keep Jamie safe from Michael. Loomis is just as bonkers as ever, and Michael feels suitably dangerous throughout, gradually removing threats before going after Jamie. He seems much more intelligent and methodical here, which elevates his threat significantly. It all just comes together nicely, and the ending is genuinely awesome.

Overall I thoroughly enjoyed this fourth entry, and after watching all of the Halloween films over the course of a month, I can honestly say that this is the second best film in the series after the original. It's just a pity that they didn't run with the ideas this film set up with subsequent entries...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Average film with a great ending...
11 July 2024
Sleepaway Camp follows Angela, a young girl who lost her brother and father in a boating accident. Years later, her and her cousin Ricky get sent to Camp Arawak for the summer. The thing is Angela has become hugely introverted since the accident, and has a hard time making friends at the camp. Sadly, she seems to have no problem making enemies, and when said enemies start turning up dead after various 'incidents', could the timid and meek Angela really be responsible? Or is someone protecting her? The truth is... well, I guess you'll have to watch it to find out!

Thanks to Halloween's raging success in 1978, the 80's were utterly rammed with slasher movies. Obviously inspired by the Friday the 13th Films, this camp slasher is just about passable for the most part. The kills are decent, even if the performances are mostly not. There are some pretty good gore effects, and the plot has enough intrigue to keep the audience interested.

This movie though, is all about the twist ending. I must admit I did know about the ending, (as in I knew the film had a shocking twist) but somehow I had managed to avoid the finer details of it until I watched it. Good lord, to say the uncut final scene of this film is disturbing is an understatement. It is exactly the sort of thing that just haunts you for days after watching it, and is genuinely shocking. You could also argue that it is quite forward thinking as well, with the themes of the ending being perhaps more relevant than ever today.

If only the rest of the film was as good as the twist, we could have had a genuine horror masterpiece on our hands. Sadly, it's a mostly average experience with a great twist. Nothing more, nothing less...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A shame it wasn't better...
11 July 2024
Halloween 3: Season of the Witch picks up with a man on the run from some mysterious guys in suits. Barely surviving a violent encounter with them, he ends up at the local hospital, babbling nonsense about Silver Shamrock halloween masks and how everyone is in danger. The Doctor in charge, Daniel Challis (Tom Atkins) just wants a peaceful shift, but when one of the suited men kills the patient and then commits suicide, he teams up with the man's daughter (Stacy Nelkin) to get to the bottom of this mystery. It's time to pay the Silver Shamrock factory a visit and get some answers...

Halloween 3 is a bit of an odd one, because it has absolutely nothing to do with any other film in the series (aside from a clip of the original Halloween playing on a TV). You see, John Carpenter and Debra Hill felt that Michael Myers' story had been told, and intended to make the series into an anthology, with each one being a separate story linked by halloween. However, that idea was scrapped when this film was received poorly by both fans and critics, which in some ways is a shame as I'm intregued by the idea of a series of anthology films, but alas... this is to date the only non-Myers film we got. And in my opinion, sadly the poor reception is justified.

The film does have some positives, it has a nicely eerie tone and atmosphere, some pretty grim deaths, and the never ending assortment of goons in suits are suitably mysterious and intimidating. However, Tom Atkins' character is quite frankly just ridiculous - an alchololic Doctor with questionable morals and a broken marriage who dumps a potential weekend with his kids to go sleuthing around a creepy town... like, what? Not exactly an inspiring protagonist, but he's fascinating to follow through this crazy film. And it is pretty crazy. Without giving away any spoilers, it's almost like something out of the Twilight Zone, with one of the most ridiculous and unrealistic diabolical schemes I think I've ever seen. The motives and goals of the main antagonist are... questionable to say the least, and huge chunks of the plot make no sense.

The performances are all over the top to the point of hilarity, the special effects are so bad and comical it's borderline ironically amazing, there's a completely out of place love scene thrown in there because... why not... and I challenge anyone to not want to scream every time that Silver Shamrock jingle starts (although I think that's perhaps the point).

I'm not entirely sure if this film is intentional satire against cheesy horror, and I can kinda see why this film has began to develop a cult following... but personally I struggled to get along with it. It's too... weird and stupid and has too many issues to be enjoyable, which is a shame as I like that it's different and was attempting to bring variety to what would eventually become a huge franchise. Oh well, I guess its time to wheel Myers out again...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween II (1981)
7/10
"I SHOT HIM SIX TIMES!! I SHOT HIM SIX TIMES!! I SH.....etc"
4 July 2024
Following on directly after the original film (and I mean that literally, both of these could be watched back to back as one giant film), Laurie gets taken to hospital and an injured Michael Myers continues his killing spree, finally ending up at the hospital where he intends to finish off Laurie.

After the surprise success of the first Halloween, the studio wanted to follow it up quickly, so asked John Carpenter and Debra Hill to pen a sequel. The thing is, Carpenter had always intended Halloween to be a self contained story, so coming up with a convincing sequel was a challenge. It shows as well, with an awkward sibling plot angle shoehorned in to justify why Michael is obsessed with Laurie. It doesn't quite come together.

Carpenter had no interest in directing this though, so directing duties went to Rick Rosenthal... and even though he did quite well - using many similar pov shots (and some cool security cam shots as well), something just doesn't quite fit right and I can't put my finger on it.

One area where this sequel massively differs to the original is in the gore. Oh boy, the gore. Whereas Halloween 1 built up atmosphere and relied on cut aways and suggestion to instill fear, this film straight up has melted faces (air filled syringe to the eyeball, anyone?) and graphic stabbings. There is no subtlety at all here, and whereas this was no doubt a sign of the times (slashers were becoming hugely popular by 1981) it somehow takes away the intelligence the original film has, making this film feel a bit more throwaway. There is a reason why today the original Halloween is regarded as a masterpiece of horror, and this... isn't.

As far as the characters are concerned, Michael feels more dangerous and Loomis is somehow even more over the top, if that's even possible... but the problem is Laurie. Our main star and final girl spends a huge chunk of the film unconscious in a hospital bed, meaning we spend a lot of our time following Michael as he just murders random character after random character. It doesn't help that these people are not exactly likable, and we barely spend any time with them, so it's basically just an excuse for gore until we can have Laurie running away from Michael again.

Still, the film is entertaining enough for what it is, and the creepy hospital setting was a good location choice. It's just a pity that this was cobbled together to satisfy studio demands, because that really does come across at times. Worth a watch but it's nowhere near as good as the original.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween (1978)
9/10
The blackest eyes... the devil's eyes...
16 June 2024
The original Halloween follows Michael Myers, a 6 year old kid who murders his older sister on Halloween night in 1963. Sent to a mental hospital for life, exactly 15 years later he breaks free and returns to his home town of Haddonfield to kill again. Hot on his tail is psychiatrist Dr. Sam Loomis, who knows exactly how dangerous Michael is and wants to stop him before it's too late. Of course, local law enforcement pretty much ignores Loomis' pleas for help hunting Michael, leaving him all but alone as he chases the deranged killer....

Halloween was by no means the first slasher movie, but it was definitely the one to popularise the genre, and put John Carpenter on the map. I think what sets it apart from the explosion of slashers that followed is that the film takes its time creating its atmosphere. The film builds suspense expertly, showing Michael in the background as he waches. And waits. He's there one minute, and not the next. For the first half of the film, nothing really happens - but you just know Michael is around and you are waiting for him to strike. There is one part in particular where 2 of the main characters are talking in a car while driving, and you notice Michael following them for a while. This doesn't really amount to anything, but the film is full of creepy stuff like that and it's great.

Then of course it's knives out and murder time. Surprisingly enough the film isn't gory at all, all of the kills either cut away or are suggested... but it doesn't matter as watching Michael stalk each victim is an exercise in tension and dread. This is all punctuated expertly by Carpenters brilliant and creepy piano score. Oh, and of course we have Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis), who is perhaps the ultimate final girl, who realises she is being hunted, saves the kids she is babysitting, and fends off Michael (with a knitting needle to the neck and a coat hanger to the eye - nice!) just long enough for Loomis to save the day. Marvellous.

Halloween is pretty great then, with buckets of atmosphere, great pacing, a creepy score and a streamlined story with no filler. Any issues? Well, some of the performances are a bit on the stiff side, and... don't get me wrong I think Loomis is great, but some of the stuff he comes out with is a bit much. It's borderline theatre! However, my main problem with the film is this. The first half, like I mentioned, has Michael in the background while the story advances in the foreground. Sometimes it is obvious he is there, sometimes it isn't. The film doesn't make a point of telling you, you either notice or you don't. That is awesome. What isn't awesome, is in the second half of the film whenever Michael appears in the background, the score plays this jarring musical motiff that is obviously designed to make the audience jump, like you are on a ghost train or something. That may have been fine for 70's cinema goers who had never seen a slasher before, but today it feels completely at odds with the brilliant build up the first half of the film did. It feels like cheap shock value, and for me it hurts the film significantly. If ONLY it had continued to have him in the background but not shout "LOOK, LOOK, THERE HE IS!!!" evey 5 seconds, we would have had a genuine 10/10 masterpiece on our hands.

Still, despite it dropping the ball a bit it is still an excellent film, and I can totally see why it gets the praise that it does. It's just a shame that none of the (12!!!!) sequels that followed could get anywhere near as good as this first entry...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed