squill
Joined Jan 2000
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews26
squill's rating
All Of Me!!"
A wonderful comic performance by Martin, matched by Tomlin's restrained, underplayed character interpretation, hit the perfect pitch in this excellent lightweight diversion.
The real payoff of this film is the closing scene. Don't want to spoil it for you, but I will say that watching these two comedic geniuses enjoying each other will put a smile and your face and set your spirit free.
It's "Feel Good" without being maudlin.
A wonderful comic performance by Martin, matched by Tomlin's restrained, underplayed character interpretation, hit the perfect pitch in this excellent lightweight diversion.
The real payoff of this film is the closing scene. Don't want to spoil it for you, but I will say that watching these two comedic geniuses enjoying each other will put a smile and your face and set your spirit free.
It's "Feel Good" without being maudlin.
This much ballyhooed trilogy of lesbian life and society's acceptance and treatment of that alternative lifestyle, lived up to it's hype.
The 1960's vignette, starring the still incandescent Vanessa Redgrave, is the most emotionally devastating, as we watch the results of that era's fear and forced silence on the remaining partner of a long-term same sex relationship. Simply heartbreaking.
The 1970's story centers more on internal acceptance within the lesbian community. Wonderful performances by both Chloe Sevigny and Michelle Williams. A script that not only captures the essence of the era, but the essence of an issue that was quite pervasive at the time.
The final act, in year 2000, is a sparkler featuring an absolute knockout comic performance by Sharon Stone as half of a lesbian couple who have decided to have an artificially inseminated child. Ms. Stone's nuanced character is nothing short of brilliant! Playing the other life partner is Ellen DeGeneres, who, except for one short lapse into her trademark (and by now annoying) verbal rambling, actually turns in a solid acting performance, perfectly complimenting Ms. Stone. A life affirming poignant jewel told beautifully by director Anne Heche. Ms. Heche's choice for the closing scene is reminiscent of, or perhaps a tribute to, Carl Reiner's in his film "All Of Me", and it produces the same deliriously joyous effect - you're intoxicated by the magic and happiness found in a simple act by those who share the bond of love.
What A Great Film.
The 1960's vignette, starring the still incandescent Vanessa Redgrave, is the most emotionally devastating, as we watch the results of that era's fear and forced silence on the remaining partner of a long-term same sex relationship. Simply heartbreaking.
The 1970's story centers more on internal acceptance within the lesbian community. Wonderful performances by both Chloe Sevigny and Michelle Williams. A script that not only captures the essence of the era, but the essence of an issue that was quite pervasive at the time.
The final act, in year 2000, is a sparkler featuring an absolute knockout comic performance by Sharon Stone as half of a lesbian couple who have decided to have an artificially inseminated child. Ms. Stone's nuanced character is nothing short of brilliant! Playing the other life partner is Ellen DeGeneres, who, except for one short lapse into her trademark (and by now annoying) verbal rambling, actually turns in a solid acting performance, perfectly complimenting Ms. Stone. A life affirming poignant jewel told beautifully by director Anne Heche. Ms. Heche's choice for the closing scene is reminiscent of, or perhaps a tribute to, Carl Reiner's in his film "All Of Me", and it produces the same deliriously joyous effect - you're intoxicated by the magic and happiness found in a simple act by those who share the bond of love.
What A Great Film.
Growing up in the 50's gave me the privilege of being one the last generations of filmgoers to enjoy the Saturday afternoon double-feature matinee experience at the neighborhood theatre. These double-features were primarily low budget sci-fi/horror epics with slender threads of plot, lovely damsels in distress (Beverly Garland, Barbara Rush), square-jawed heroes (Peter Graves, Richard Carlson) and budget monsters from Mars, the grave, melted icebergs, mad scientist's labs or atomic fallout. Well not really. The monsters were usually guys in rubber suits (Creature From The Black Lagoon, This Island Earth), or cheap trick photography (Tarantula, Attack of the 50 Ft Woman), or `Mask and Glove' illusions (I Was A Teenage Werewolf/Frankenstein, Monster On The Campus), or, if we were really lucky, a Ray Harryhausen stop motion creation.
Needless to say this wasn't great cinema, but what it WAS, was great fun. Were you scared? Not really. Did you have the need for everything to be fact-based and believable? Of course not! You went to be entertained, to let your imagination merge with the sounds and images and have a good time, laughing or screaming. Could anyone really take the monster from `It Conquered The World' seriously, or wonder whether `The Creature From The Black Lagoon' was biologically possible or if it could anatomically deflower Julie Adams? Didn't matter. Instead, you let yourself meld into the film's world and travel along for the ride.
Thus whether you were on the obviously and badly animated `Angry Red Planet', or trapped with James Best on the island of dogs in make-up which were trying to pass for `The Killer Shrews', you surrendered to the magic.
My heart weeps for the post `Star Wars' filmgoers, these people weaned on special effects, the MTVers and video viewers who've had their imaginations and attention spans kidnapped and are told what to see and how to interpret it. I truly am sorry. You people missed a modern day, Grade B double feature, sci-fi/horror classic called `Anaconda'. And we hadn't seen one this good since `Alien'.
Being an intelligent man, I realize the futility of convincing the non-believers who can't draw from the needed background reservoir to understand, so I won't bother preaching this film's virtues or try to win you over by fact and argument. This, however, is what I will say
This is a brilliant re-creation of the lost art of the 1950's double-feature horror genre; not really a homage to, more the real thing. It's `Creature From The Black Lagoon', with a really cheesy computer animated snake in place of a guy in a really cheesy rubber suit. It's a Saturday afternoon classic for people who remember and understand them. Story is great, script is great, cinematography is great, direction is great, acting is great, the women beautiful and endangered, the heroes machismo and handsome, the monster phantasmagorical, and we get a bonus surprise by one of the greatest American actors, Jon Voight, doing a magnificent over-the-top, slimy, nasty, reprehensibly heartless villain, complete with a sly wink to the audience. His performance is the key to the film. He understood the film's intent and translated it to the screen for you. If it's in your realm of understanding and experience, you get it and are able to partake in this little slice of cinema heaven.
In 20 years, they'll be calling this a classic. I'm calling it one now.
Needless to say this wasn't great cinema, but what it WAS, was great fun. Were you scared? Not really. Did you have the need for everything to be fact-based and believable? Of course not! You went to be entertained, to let your imagination merge with the sounds and images and have a good time, laughing or screaming. Could anyone really take the monster from `It Conquered The World' seriously, or wonder whether `The Creature From The Black Lagoon' was biologically possible or if it could anatomically deflower Julie Adams? Didn't matter. Instead, you let yourself meld into the film's world and travel along for the ride.
Thus whether you were on the obviously and badly animated `Angry Red Planet', or trapped with James Best on the island of dogs in make-up which were trying to pass for `The Killer Shrews', you surrendered to the magic.
My heart weeps for the post `Star Wars' filmgoers, these people weaned on special effects, the MTVers and video viewers who've had their imaginations and attention spans kidnapped and are told what to see and how to interpret it. I truly am sorry. You people missed a modern day, Grade B double feature, sci-fi/horror classic called `Anaconda'. And we hadn't seen one this good since `Alien'.
Being an intelligent man, I realize the futility of convincing the non-believers who can't draw from the needed background reservoir to understand, so I won't bother preaching this film's virtues or try to win you over by fact and argument. This, however, is what I will say
This is a brilliant re-creation of the lost art of the 1950's double-feature horror genre; not really a homage to, more the real thing. It's `Creature From The Black Lagoon', with a really cheesy computer animated snake in place of a guy in a really cheesy rubber suit. It's a Saturday afternoon classic for people who remember and understand them. Story is great, script is great, cinematography is great, direction is great, acting is great, the women beautiful and endangered, the heroes machismo and handsome, the monster phantasmagorical, and we get a bonus surprise by one of the greatest American actors, Jon Voight, doing a magnificent over-the-top, slimy, nasty, reprehensibly heartless villain, complete with a sly wink to the audience. His performance is the key to the film. He understood the film's intent and translated it to the screen for you. If it's in your realm of understanding and experience, you get it and are able to partake in this little slice of cinema heaven.
In 20 years, they'll be calling this a classic. I'm calling it one now.