Daniel and Christopher have to rely on their close friends and families to help them through drama on the eve of their wedding.Daniel and Christopher have to rely on their close friends and families to help them through drama on the eve of their wedding.Daniel and Christopher have to rely on their close friends and families to help them through drama on the eve of their wedding.
- Awards
- 1 nomination
Paul Del Rosario
- Extra
- (as Paul Toin Del Rosario)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- GoofsAt 43:56, Christopher confuses 300% with 300 times.
- Quotes
Daniel: It really doesn't matter.
Christopher: No, it matters, but not as much as making the commitment.
- ConnectionsReferences Dawson's Creek (1998)
Featured review
Form Over Substance. Production Values: 7.4 - Acting: 8.8 - Dialogue: 5.2.
I am not going to start with any comment on the double entendre of the title. That is something that more involves the end... A pleasant, very decent movie with a professional cast. I didn't quite believe that these two could be a real couple, or that they would live in such a - somewhat - prosperous ambience with no visible means of support. Their economic background should have been written into the dialogue, somehow. Daniel confides to his friend that he has bought his betrothed a $300.00 pen in a tone suggesting that that is a lot of money to him. However, they are living in a large house in a neighborhood walking distance from the Hollywood sign... And we don't get any idea as to how Daniel got this money; his love interest Christopher is apparently an artist (and how many unknown artists ever make any real money?). The only person who ever bought a quantity of Christopher's art was Daniel. We don't even see any of his art, so either the budget didn't allow for licensing of any actual artist's work, or this work of ersatz Cinéma Vérité lacked a props master with such foresight. A long-lost friend reappears and he doesn't show her any of his life's work: His art...? The form is far greater here than the substance. The acting is near perfectly adequate. The production values are exceptionally adequate - but not notable. I am not saying that the narrative is shallow, but if this was a day at the beach you would barely get your knees wet. There was not any single line that was memorable, no scintillating dialogue. No real contour of emotional or erotic glamour. The scriptwriter may have captured verbal realism, but if people want that they can hear it on a bus or at a Burger King. It offers self-help, but in a very contradictory form. Who needs to hear the ancient cliché that "opposites really do attract". One minute Christopher realizes that he needs to deal with his past, and the next he is dismissing the past offhand. What does acknowledging and dealing with your past actually mean in practical terms? : Rehashed pop psychology. It became tedious at about half way for me. There was no real tension. A friend cancels, and that tension could have been easily undone by Daniel taking a few deep breaths. If the wedding had been a huge financial investment then it would have been different, but that was not indicated in any of the dialogue... Was this worth making? Yes. Is it worth seeing? Yes, but not an imperative. If you like predictability you'll like this movie. You don't have to wait until the end to get the pay off - you get it right at the first encounter. Just the way you want it.
helpful•01
- raymarsh-51084
- Jun 29, 2022
- How long is Do You Take This Man?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 32 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
![Alyson Hannigan, Marla Sokoloff, Sam Anderson, Mackenzie Astin, Thomas Dekker, Lee Garlington, Anthony Rapp, Jonathan Bennett, Hutchi Hancock, Alona Tal, and Adam Huber in Do You Take This Man (2016)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNjkyZDk2MzYtOWU4OC00MzYxLWFmN2EtN2Q1YTJkNDU3NjEwXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjg0ODE1ODE@._V1_QL75_UY133_CR1,0,90,133_.jpg)