The history of legendary rock band Chicago is chronicled from their inception in 1967 all the way to the present.The history of legendary rock band Chicago is chronicled from their inception in 1967 all the way to the present.The history of legendary rock band Chicago is chronicled from their inception in 1967 all the way to the present.
- Awards
- 4 wins total
James Pankow
- Self
- (as Jimmy Pankow)
Peter Cetera
- Self
- (archive footage)
Terry Kath
- Self
- (archive footage)
James William Guercio
- Self
- (archive footage)
Bill Champlin
- Self
- (archive footage)
Dawayne Bailey
- Self
- (archive footage)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe "Billboard" chart images used to show the positions of the various Chicago hit songs are apparently created for the documentary. They all include many songs from the late 60s and early 70s despite referring to songs that charted in the 80s.
Featured review
This is a documentary I've been wanting to see for a while because I really like Chicago's music and this serves as a vehicle for a better understanding of the band's creative input and output. Evidently, it doesn't help to fully understand the ups and downs of the relationships between all band members because not every member was involved in the making of this documentary nor with testimony to aid the band's story. So, considering how conflictingly the band parted ways with whom was the voice and face of the band, Mr. Peter Cetera along with the producer who co-wrote with Cetera some of the band's most successful tunes, this doesn't give you the full scope, because there is one side missing.
I like Chicago's 70's songs and the latter music of their career as well, so I'm not divided as many of their fans are. In the beginning of the documentary, I felt they were telling the story of their beginnings a little fast; and since I didn't know how the members looked in real life, I had a bit of trouble remembering who was who and what instrument each of them played. One thing I didn't particularly liked is that they didn't even named Peter Cetera until they got to If You Leave Me Now, I think that they should have introduced each of the members at the beginning.
There is a heart-warming tribute to Terry Kath, who contributed enormously to the band's sound in the early days with his technical guitar playing. Troubles begin when the film reaches the part where Chicago's musical direction changed. Since in this era of the band, Cetera's musical input was massive, it's inevitable for him to take center stage in this story, but his refusal to appear in the documentary leaves many questions unanswered and leaves it without a key point of view to understand the story better. So that is the main flaw this documentary has, it's only one side of the story, but it's a decent side, it's enough to understand how the majority of the members felt during the different stages they went through as the years went by. But I can't take their truth when it comes to absent members unless we get both sides of the same coin.
To be honest, it's hard not to enjoy the documentary, even if you don't think that it comes across as sincere, because it deals with the music of one of the greatest bands of all time, Chicago.
I like Chicago's 70's songs and the latter music of their career as well, so I'm not divided as many of their fans are. In the beginning of the documentary, I felt they were telling the story of their beginnings a little fast; and since I didn't know how the members looked in real life, I had a bit of trouble remembering who was who and what instrument each of them played. One thing I didn't particularly liked is that they didn't even named Peter Cetera until they got to If You Leave Me Now, I think that they should have introduced each of the members at the beginning.
There is a heart-warming tribute to Terry Kath, who contributed enormously to the band's sound in the early days with his technical guitar playing. Troubles begin when the film reaches the part where Chicago's musical direction changed. Since in this era of the band, Cetera's musical input was massive, it's inevitable for him to take center stage in this story, but his refusal to appear in the documentary leaves many questions unanswered and leaves it without a key point of view to understand the story better. So that is the main flaw this documentary has, it's only one side of the story, but it's a decent side, it's enough to understand how the majority of the members felt during the different stages they went through as the years went by. But I can't take their truth when it comes to absent members unless we get both sides of the same coin.
To be honest, it's hard not to enjoy the documentary, even if you don't think that it comes across as sincere, because it deals with the music of one of the greatest bands of all time, Chicago.
- patriciogl10
- Oct 30, 2019
- Permalink
- How long is Now More Than Ever: The History of Chicago?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- ザ・ヒストリー・オブ・シカゴ ナウ・モア・ザン・エヴァー
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 53 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content

Top Gap
By what name was Now More Than Ever: The History of Chicago (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer