Clip show featuring remarkable, terrifying and unexplained camera footage. With first-hand accounts from those who captured the images and analysis from experts.Clip show featuring remarkable, terrifying and unexplained camera footage. With first-hand accounts from those who captured the images and analysis from experts.Clip show featuring remarkable, terrifying and unexplained camera footage. With first-hand accounts from those who captured the images and analysis from experts.
Browse episodes
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaShows way more footage than Paranormal Caught on Camera (2019). For example, in UFOs in the Forest, Sightings by the Sea and Demon in a Box (2021), the Canada man being pursued by his box of "Canneberges" cereal shows way more instances of the box moving on the kitchen counter towards him, whereas PCOC only showed the final instance, and repeated that over and over again. (Audiences have counted over a dozen times for a clip to be repeated on that show, while their "experts" comment.) Also, this show doesn't seem to blur audience-submitted paranormal videos beyond 80p, which is the norm at PCOC, their 'sister' show.
- GoofsIn one segment, they showed a woman afflicted with some sort of psychopathy, possibly dementia praecox, and who decided to marry her life-size zombie doll in her backyard. This had absolutely nothing unexplained whatsoever and nothing paranormal. This show isn't about pathology yet it went on interviewing the woman with an abnormal fixation for one of her dolls. (This rather belonged on TLC, right along with the hoarders' shows.)
Featured review
Too strick is simply denial
The Parapsychologist who likes to find even the most obscure possibility, as a debunk for phenomena, especially repeative phenomena, is simply in denial. One example he used to white wash all Orbs is that the only happen on digital format cameras. That isn't true first of all, I've seen many orb photos on film except the exposures are usually longer and one would see trails instead. Even if it were true, different formats see different ranges or types of phenomena, even instruments in the same venue. For example, an AM radio won't de-modulate a FM signal or vice-versa, and there are many examples of what a particular device can "see". He as a self proclaimed scientist should know that. I use multiple instruments, not because any of them are ineffective, but because they all have limits to what they are designed to sense.
In general, and with the exception noted above, I find this show better than the other program which uses completely unqualified commentators who merely repeat the obvious.
In general, and with the exception noted above, I find this show better than the other program which uses completely unqualified commentators who merely repeat the obvious.
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Unexplained: Caught on Camera (2019) officially released in India in English?
Answer