Review of Immortalist

Immortalist (2021)
2/10
A perverted and anti-human portrayal of longevity and cryonics
8 February 2022
This is a sick film. It is an out-right attack on those in the longevity and cryonics movements that are trying to reduce suffering and extend healthspan.

The main character is incredibly unlikable and is framed as a deranged nut who is flawed in many ways. The director runs with the worst-possible stereotype of those working to use technology to improve the human condition. Among other things he is portrayed as hypocritical because he takes supplements to try to live longer but also smokes. In the scene where he delivers his speech, he seems downright diabolical. The part of the film where he refuses to have sex is almost un-watchable and further puts the character in a terrible light. The general message is that longevity activists are deranged kooks who are selfish and not empathetic. Which is the exact opposite of the truth!!! The director clearly is very divorced from the realities of the longevity and cryonics movements and has a deeply cynical view of humans, bordering on anti-human and pro-death.

The longevity movement is largely filled with altruistic caring people who want to reduce suffering and healthcare costs.

That said, I think the film is very well shot and produced, it's just everything else about the film that is bad, including some of the acting. The neo-noir style is well done and gives everything dystopian, negative vibes as was intended. I suspect Aubrey de Grey is having his named used to market this film without his full consent.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed