Households distibution for all U.S. cities (pop. 10,000+)
Top 101 cities with the highest percentage of family households, population 10,000+ | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank | City | Households |
| 1. | Fort Benning South, GA (housing) (pop. 10,887) | 98.1% |
| 2. | Fort Bragg, NC (housing) (pop. 29,731) | 97.7% |
| 3. | Camp Pendleton South, CA (housing) (pop. 10,616) | 97.3% |
| 4. | Fort Campbell, KY (housing) (pop. 17,198) | 96.2% |
| 5. | Fort Campbell North, KY (housing) (pop. 13,685) | 96.2% |
| 6. | Fort Hood, TX (housing) (pop. 29,589) | 95.6% |
| 7. | Fort Carson, CO (housing) (pop. 13,813) | 94.7% |
| 8. | Highland, UT (housing) (pop. 17,011) | 94.6% |
| 9. | Fort Lewis, WA (housing) (pop. 11,046) | 93.9% |
| 10. | Kiryas Joel, NY (housing) (pop. 21,894) | 93.6% |
| 11. | Schofield Barracks, HI (housing) (pop. 16,370) | 93.3% |
| 12. | San Luis, AZ (housing) (pop. 31,180) | 92.9% |
| 13. | Eagle Mountain, UT (housing) (pop. 24,217) | 92.8% |
| 14. | Coachella, CA (housing) (pop. 43,092) | 92.6% |
| 15. | Monsey, NY (housing) (pop. 18,412) | 91.8% |
| 16. | Saratoga Springs, UT (housing) (pop. 22,749) | 91.7% |
| 17. | Murphy, TX (housing) (pop. 19,515) | 91.6% |
| 18. | Fort Knox, KY (housing) (pop. 10,124) | 91.3% |
| 19. | La Homa, TX (housing) (pop. 11,985) | 91.2% |
| 20. | Southlake, TX (housing) (pop. 28,234) | 91.1% |
| 21. | Syracuse, UT (housing) (pop. 25,775) | 91.1% |
| 22. | McFarland, CA (housing) (pop. 12,420) | 91.0% |
| 23. | Goodings Grove, IL (housing) (pop. 22,530) | 91.0% |
| 24. | Alpine, UT (housing) (pop. 10,024) | 90.9% |
| 25. | Hidalgo, TX (housing) (pop. 13,273) | 90.8% |
| 26. | Travilah, MD (housing) (pop. 12,159) | 90.7% |
| 27. | Alton, TX (housing) (pop. 15,050) | 90.6% |
| 28. | Herriman, UT (housing) (pop. 26,362) | 90.6% |
| 29. | Oquirrh, UT (housing) (pop. 11,558) | 90.5% |
| 30. | Blackhawk-Camino Tassajara, CA (housing) (pop. 10,652) | 90.5% |
| 31. | Lindon, UT (housing) (pop. 10,611) | 90.5% |
| 32. | Campton Hills, IL (housing) (pop. 11,305) | 90.4% |
| 33. | Four Corners, TX (housing) (pop. 12,382) | 90.3% |
| 34. | Wolf Trap, VA (housing) (pop. 16,131) | 90.3% |
| 35. | Cedar Hills, UT (housing) (pop. 10,179) | 90.2% |
| 36. | San Elizario, TX (housing) (pop. 13,603) | 90.2% |
| 37. | Sienna Plantation, TX (housing) (pop. 13,721) | 90.2% |
| 38. | South San Jose Hills, CA (housing) (pop. 20,551) | 90.0% |
| 39. | Arvin, CA (housing) (pop. 20,298) | 90.0% |
| 40. | Walnut, CA (housing) (pop. 30,065) | 90.0% |
| 41. | Eastvale, CA (housing) (pop. 55,191) | 89.9% |
| 42. | Richmond West, FL (housing) (pop. 31,973) | 89.6% |
| 43. | Greenfield, CA (housing) (pop. 16,869) | 89.6% |
| 44. | Bingham, UT (housing) (pop. 24,210) | 89.5% |
| 45. | Parlier, CA (housing) (pop. 14,865) | 89.5% |
| 46. | Lynwood, CA (housing) (pop. 71,371) | 89.5% |
| 47. | Green Valley, MD (housing) (pop. 14,037) | 89.4% |
| 48. | Great Falls, VA (housing) (pop. 15,427) | 89.2% |
| 49. | Valinda, CA (housing) (pop. 22,822) | 89.2% |
| 50. | New Territory, TX (housing) (pop. 15,186) | 89.2% |
| 51. | Soledad, CA (housing) (pop. 25,849) | 89.1% |
| 52. | Franklin Farm, VA (housing) (pop. 19,288) | 89.0% |
| 53. | East Rancho Dominguez, CA (housing) (pop. 15,135) | 89.0% |
| 54. | Cudahy, CA (housing) (pop. 24,103) | 89.0% |
| 55. | Weddington, NC (housing) (pop. 10,101) | 88.9% |
| 56. | Livingston, CA (housing) (pop. 13,571) | 88.8% |
| 57. | Bell Gardens, CA (housing) (pop. 42,889) | 88.8% |
| 58. | Short Hills, NJ (housing) (pop. 13,165) | 88.8% |
| 59. | Lehi, UT (housing) (pop. 54,382) | 88.7% |
| 60. | West Puente Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 22,636) | 88.6% |
| 61. | Riverton, UT (housing) (pop. 40,921) | 88.6% |
| 62. | Colleyville, TX (housing) (pop. 24,500) | 88.5% |
| 63. | Coto de Caza, CA (housing) (pop. 14,866) | 88.5% |
| 64. | Scarsdale, NY (housing) (pop. 17,605) | 88.4% |
| 65. | Fort Drum, NY (housing) (pop. 12,955) | 88.4% |
| 66. | Castle Pines, CO (housing) (pop. 10,726) | 88.4% |
| 67. | Somerton, AZ (housing) (pop. 14,994) | 88.4% |
| 68. | Highland Village, TX (housing) (pop. 15,747) | 88.3% |
| 69. | Baldwin Park, CA (housing) (pop. 76,635) | 88.2% |
| 70. | San Juan, TX (housing) (pop. 35,593) | 88.2% |
| 71. | The Pinery, CO (housing) (pop. 10,517) | 88.1% |
| 72. | Delhi, CA (housing) (pop. 10,755) | 88.1% |
| 73. | Dranesville, VA (housing) (pop. 11,921) | 87.8% |
| 74. | Fish Hawk, FL (housing) (pop. 14,087) | 87.8% |
| 75. | French Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 23,067) | 87.8% |
| 76. | Perris, CA (housing) (pop. 72,326) | 87.7% |
| 77. | Dix Hills, NY (housing) (pop. 26,892) | 87.7% |
| 78. | Ewa Beach, HI (housing) (pop. 14,955) | 87.7% |
| 79. | Florence-Graham, CA (housing) (pop. 63,387) | 87.6% |
| 80. | Socorro, TX (housing) (pop. 32,517) | 87.6% |
| 81. | South El Monte, CA (housing) (pop. 20,398) | 87.6% |
| 82. | Walnut Park, CA (housing) (pop. 15,966) | 87.5% |
| 83. | Dardenne Prairie, MO (housing) (pop. 12,324) | 87.4% |
| 84. | Brentwood, TN (housing) (pop. 40,021) | 87.3% |
| 85. | Arlington, TN (housing) (pop. 11,664) | 87.3% |
| 86. | Delano, CA (housing) (pop. 52,403) | 87.2% |
| 87. | Farmersville, CA (housing) (pop. 10,720) | 87.2% |
| 88. | Spanish Fork, UT (housing) (pop. 36,956) | 86.9% |
| 89. | Linton Hall, VA (housing) (pop. 35,725) | 86.9% |
| 90. | Five Forks, SC (housing) (pop. 14,140) | 86.9% |
| 91. | Lamont, CA (housing) (pop. 15,120) | 86.9% |
| 92. | Vincent, CA (housing) (pop. 15,922) | 86.9% |
| 93. | Kaysville, UT (housing) (pop. 28,876) | 86.8% |
| 94. | Country Walk, FL (housing) (pop. 15,997) | 86.8% |
| 95. | Clarksburg, MD (housing) (pop. 13,766) | 86.8% |
| 96. | Maywood, CA (housing) (pop. 27,748) | 86.8% |
| 97. | Greenfield-Panama, CA (housing) (pop. 20,776) | 86.7% |
| 98. | Avocado Heights, CA (housing) (pop. 15,411) | 86.7% |
| 99. | Muscoy, CA (housing) (pop. 10,644) | 86.6% |
| 100. | Cutler, FL (housing) (pop. 18,889) | 86.6% |
| 101. | South Gate, CA (housing) (pop. 95,677) | 86.6% |