Top 101 cities with largest percentage of females in occupations: Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations (population 50,000+)

Females (%) distibution for all U.S. cities (pop. 50,000+)

Top 101 cities with largest percentage of females in occupations: Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations (population 50,000+)

RankCityFemales (%)
1.
Delano, CA (housing) (pop. 52,403)31.4%
2.
Santa Maria, CA (housing) (pop. 102,216)20.0%
3.
Watsonville, CA (housing) (pop. 52,477)15.1%
4.
Madera, CA (housing) (pop. 63,105)14.1%
5.
Yakima, WA (housing) (pop. 93,257)11.6%
6.
Oxnard, CA (housing) (pop. 203,007)11.4%
7.
Salinas, CA (housing) (pop. 155,662)11.3%
8.
Pasco, WA (housing) (pop. 67,599)11.1%
9.
Porterville, CA (housing) (pop. 55,174)8.8%
10.
Merced, CA (housing) (pop. 81,102)6.6%
11.
Homestead, FL (housing) (pop. 64,079)4.0%
12.
Gilroy, CA (housing) (pop. 51,701)4.0%
13.
Hillsboro, OR (housing) (pop. 97,368)3.7%
14.
Yuba City, CA (housing) (pop. 65,416)3.6%
15.
Lodi, CA (housing) (pop. 63,338)3.5%
16.
Woodland, CA (housing) (pop. 56,590)3.5%
17.
Tulare, CA (housing) (pop. 61,170)3.4%
18.
Fort Myers, FL (housing) (pop. 68,190)3.1%
19.
Salem, OR (housing) (pop. 160,614)2.8%
20.
Springdale, AR (housing) (pop. 75,229)2.6%
21.
Green Bay, WI (housing) (pop. 104,779)2.6%
22.
Bakersfield, CA (housing) (pop. 363,630)2.6%
23.
College Station, TX (housing) (pop. 100,050)2.4%
24.
Stockton, CA (housing) (pop. 298,118)2.4%
25.
Fresno, CA (housing) (pop. 509,924)2.0%
26.
Athens-Clarke County, GA (housing) (pop. 119,980)2.0%
27.
San Angelo, TX (housing) (pop. 97,492)1.9%
28.
East Los Angeles, CA (housing) (pop. 126,496)1.8%
29.
Hanford, CA (housing) (pop. 54,686)1.8%
30.
Victorville, CA (housing) (pop. 121,096)1.8%
31.
Turlock, CA (housing) (pop. 70,365)1.8%
32.
Idaho Falls, ID (housing) (pop. 58,292)1.7%
33.
Harrisonburg, VA (housing) (pop. 51,395)1.6%
34.
San Bernardino, CA (housing) (pop. 213,708)1.5%
35.
Grand Rapids, MI (housing) (pop. 192,294)1.4%
36.
Indio, CA (housing) (pop. 83,539)1.4%
37.
Vista, CA (housing) (pop. 96,929)1.4%
38.
Yuma, AZ (housing) (pop. 91,923)1.3%
39.
Reading, PA (housing) (pop. 87,893)1.2%
40.
Medford, OR (housing) (pop. 77,677)1.2%
41.
Pomona, CA (housing) (pop. 151,348)1.1%
42.
Huntington Park, CA (housing) (pop. 58,879)1.1%
43.
Valdosta, GA (housing) (pop. 56,481)1.1%
44.
Springfield, OR (housing) (pop. 60,177)1.1%
45.
Racine, WI (housing) (pop. 78,199)1.0%
46.
Manhattan, KS (housing) (pop. 56,143)1.0%
47.
Springfield, MA (housing) (pop. 153,703)1.0%
48.
Santa Ana, CA (housing) (pop. 334,227)1.0%
49.
Brentwood, CA (housing) (pop. 55,000)0.9%
50.
Modesto, CA (housing) (pop. 204,933)0.9%
51.
Clovis, CA (housing) (pop. 99,769)0.9%
52.
Normal, IL (housing) (pop. 54,664)0.9%
53.
Auburn, WA (housing) (pop. 74,860)0.9%
54.
El Monte, CA (housing) (pop. 115,708)0.9%
55.
Westminster, CA (housing) (pop. 91,739)0.9%
56.
Pflugerville, TX (housing) (pop. 53,752)0.9%
57.
Janesville, WI (housing) (pop. 63,820)0.9%
58.
Eastvale, CA (housing) (pop. 55,191)0.8%
59.
Poinciana, FL (housing) (pop. 53,193)0.8%
60.
Kennewick, WA (housing) (pop. 76,762)0.8%
61.
San Rafael, CA (housing) (pop. 58,994)0.8%
62.
Mesa, AZ (housing) (pop. 457,587)0.8%
63.
Goodyear, AZ (housing) (pop. 72,864)0.8%
64.
Napa, CA (housing) (pop. 79,068)0.8%
65.
Battle Creek, MI (housing) (pop. 51,848)0.8%
66.
Waukesha, WI (housing) (pop. 71,016)0.8%
67.
Lynwood, CA (housing) (pop. 71,371)0.7%
68.
Ames, IA (housing) (pop. 61,792)0.7%
69.
Bossier City, LA (housing) (pop. 66,333)0.7%
70.
Inglewood, CA (housing) (pop. 111,542)0.7%
71.
Santa Cruz, CA (housing) (pop. 62,864)0.7%
72.
Pharr, TX (housing) (pop. 73,790)0.7%
73.
Paramount, CA (housing) (pop. 54,980)0.7%
74.
Fairfield, CA (housing) (pop. 109,320)0.6%
75.
Norwalk, CA (housing) (pop. 106,589)0.6%
76.
New Bedford, MA (housing) (pop. 95,078)0.6%
77.
Peoria, AZ (housing) (pop. 162,592)0.6%
78.
Escondido, CA (housing) (pop. 148,738)0.6%
79.
McAllen, TX (housing) (pop. 136,639)0.6%
80.
Perris, CA (housing) (pop. 72,326)0.6%
81.
Palm Coast, FL (housing) (pop. 78,740)0.6%
82.
Antioch, CA (housing) (pop. 107,100)0.6%
83.
Champaign, IL (housing) (pop. 83,424)0.6%
84.
Lancaster, CA (housing) (pop. 159,523)0.6%
85.
Apple Valley, MN (housing) (pop. 50,201)0.6%
86.
Richmond, CA (housing) (pop. 107,571)0.5%
87.
St. Joseph, MO (housing) (pop. 77,147)0.5%
88.
Rogers, AR (housing) (pop. 60,112)0.5%
89.
Santa Barbara, CA (housing) (pop. 90,412)0.5%
90.
Detroit, MI (housing) (pop. 688,701)0.5%
91.
Spring Hill, FL (housing) (pop. 98,621)0.5%
92.
Columbia, MO (housing) (pop. 115,276)0.5%
93.
Missoula, MT (housing) (pop. 69,122)0.5%
94.
Pico Rivera, CA (housing) (pop. 63,771)0.5%
95.
Visalia, CA (housing) (pop. 127,763)0.5%
96.
Flint, MI (housing) (pop. 99,763)0.5%
97.
Norman, OK (housing) (pop. 118,197)0.5%
98.
Ontario, CA (housing) (pop. 167,500)0.5%
99.
North Little Rock, AR (housing) (pop. 66,075)0.5%
100.
West Palm Beach, FL (housing) (pop. 102,436)0.5%
101.
Florence-Graham, CA (housing) (pop. 63,387)0.5%
Also check out our website just for ranking top lists with best, worst, and most of everything: ShareRanks.com.
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.