Top 101 cities with largest percentage of females in occupations: Assemblers and fabricators (population 50,000+)

Females (%) distibution for all U.S. cities (pop. 50,000+)

Top 101 cities with largest percentage of females in occupations: Assemblers and fabricators (population 50,000+)

RankCityFemales (%)
1.
Perris Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 190,588)2.8%
2.
Union, NY (housing) (pop. 56,346)2.1%
3.
Jurupa, CA (housing) (pop. 112,225)2.1%
4.
Elsinore Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 93,311)2.0%
5.
North Pinal, AZ (housing) (pop. 100,105)1.9%
6.
Shelby, MI (housing) (pop. 68,294)1.8%
7.
Arivaca, AZ (housing) (pop. 59,243)1.8%
8.
North Cleveland, OK (housing) (pop. 102,211)1.6%
9.
North Coast, CA (housing) (pop. 376,527)1.6%
10.
Fayette, KY (housing) (pop. 286,518)1.6%
11.
North Davis, UT (housing) (pop. 179,550)1.5%
12.
East Canadian, OK (housing) (pop. 72,697)1.4%
13.
Waterford, MI (housing) (pop. 73,473)1.4%
14.
East San Gabriel Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 952,352)1.4%
15.
Louisville, KY (housing) (pop. 262,764)1.3%
16.
East Grayson, TX (housing) (pop. 86,658)1.3%
17.
San Gorgonio Pass, CA (housing) (pop. 70,591)1.3%
18.
Somerset West-Rock Creek, OR (housing) (pop. 62,062)1.3%
19.
Canton, MI (housing) (pop. 73,490)1.2%
20.
Irvington, NJ (housing) (pop. 58,920)1.2%
21.
West Adams, CO (housing) (pop. 310,409)1.2%
22.
Brazosport, TX (housing) (pop. 71,908)1.0%
23.
Upper San Gabriel Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 327,431)0.9%
24.
Lompoc Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 58,405)0.9%
25.
Edison, NJ (housing) (pop. 101,207)0.9%
26.
South Antelope Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 171,490)0.8%
27.
Dacula-Rocky Creek, GA (housing) (pop. 51,522)0.8%
28.
Graham-Thrift, WA (housing) (pop. 62,639)0.8%
29.
Santa Maria Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 110,971)0.8%
30.
Newhall, CA (housing) (pop. 192,980)0.8%
31.
North Westside, FL (housing) (pop. 110,020)0.8%
32.
Southwest San Gabriel Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 326,450)0.8%
33.
Carol City, FL (housing) (pop. 64,569)0.7%
34.
Northwest Clackamas, OR (housing) (pop. 248,034)0.7%
35.
Northeast Tarrant, TX (housing) (pop. 472,730)0.7%
36.
East Seattle, WA (housing) (pop. 512,735)0.7%
37.
East Contra Costa, CA (housing) (pop. 78,216)0.7%
38.
Columbus, GA (housing) (pop. 185,888)0.7%
39.
Ventura, CA (housing) (pop. 110,873)0.7%
40.
Manchester, CT (housing) (pop. 58,241)0.7%
41.
Wayne, NJ (housing) (pop. 53,657)0.7%
42.
North Antelope Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 153,969)0.7%
43.
Metropolitan Government, TN (housing) (pop. 620,916)0.7%
44.
Northwest Dade, FL (housing) (pop. 113,920)0.7%
45.
Hamden, CT (housing) (pop. 60,960)0.7%
46.
South Davis, UT (housing) (pop. 106,781)0.6%
47.
El Toro, CA (housing) (pop. 178,968)0.6%
48.
Mather, CA (housing) (pop. 108,400)0.6%
49.
Northwest Harris, TX (housing) (pop. 464,301)0.6%
50.
Issaquah Plateau, WA (housing) (pop. 53,651)0.6%
51.
Athens, GA (housing) (pop. 85,116)0.6%
52.
Boca Ciega, FL (housing) (pop. 68,887)0.6%
53.
Coachella Valley, CA (housing) (pop. 156,830)0.5%
54.
West Contra Costa, CA (housing) (pop. 250,207)0.5%
55.
Amherst, NY (housing) (pop. 122,366)0.5%
56.
Central Coast, CA (housing) (pop. 238,434)0.5%
57.
Northeast Jefferson, CO (housing) (pop. 451,811)0.5%
58.
Trabuco, CA (housing) (pop. 193,712)0.5%
59.
Enumclaw Plateau, WA (housing) (pop. 57,513)0.5%
60.
Clay, NY (housing) (pop. 58,206)0.5%
61.
West Dougherty, GA (housing) (pop. 59,317)0.4%
62.
South El Dorado, CA (housing) (pop. 87,572)0.4%
63.
Weymouth, MA (housing) (pop. 54,393)0.4%
64.
Gulf Breeze-Harold, FL (housing) (pop. 67,908)0.4%
65.
Southeast Montgomery, TX (housing) (pop. 288,750)0.4%
66.
Ramapo, NY (housing) (pop. 126,595)0.4%
67.
Wheaton-Glenmont, MD (housing) (pop. 61,910)0.4%
68.
South Aurora, CO (housing) (pop. 329,151)0.4%
69.
Southeast Hidalgo, TX (housing) (pop. 124,914)0.4%
70.
Southwest Arapahoe, CO (housing) (pop. 201,720)0.4%
71.
Bronx, NY (housing) (pop. 1,383,871)0.4%
72.
Augusta, GA (housing) (pop. 136,381)0.4%
73.
Fairfield, CT (housing) (pop. 59,404)0.4%
74.
Citrus Park-Fern Lake, FL (housing) (pop. 117,103)0.4%
75.
Deer Valley, AZ (housing) (pop. 186,030)0.4%
76.
South Coast, CA (housing) (pop. 298,389)0.4%
77.
Coconino, AZ (housing) (pop. 81,338)0.3%
78.
Dutch Fork, SC (housing) (pop. 66,450)0.3%
79.
North Hempstead, NY (housing) (pop. 226,322)0.3%
80.
Tahoma-Maple Valley, WA (housing) (pop. 56,368)0.3%
81.
Kendale Lakes-Lindgren Acres, FL (housing) (pop. 341,815)0.3%
82.
Palos Verdes, CA (housing) (pop. 91,593)0.3%
83.
Queens, NY (housing) (pop. 2,277,251)0.3%
84.
Greenwich, CT (housing) (pop. 61,171)0.3%
85.
South Westside, FL (housing) (pop. 99,883)0.3%
86.
Clarkstown, NY (housing) (pop. 84,187)0.3%
87.
West Bloomfield Township, MI (housing) (pop. 65,149)0.2%
88.
Southeast Harris, TX (housing) (pop. 93,921)0.2%
89.
Brooklyn, NY (housing) (pop. 2,538,705)0.2%
90.
Central Contra Costa, CA (housing) (pop. 486,883)0.2%
91.
Tanner-Williams, AL (housing) (pop. 60,211)0.2%
92.
East Kern, CA (housing) (pop. 82,330)0.2%
93.
Union, NJ (housing) (pop. 54,050)0.2%
94.
Sunshine Parkway, FL (housing) (pop. 153,186)0.2%
95.
Manhattan, NY (housing) (pop. 1,621,897)0.2%
96.
Northeast Marin, CA (housing) (pop. 54,172)0.1%
97.
Greater Newark, DE (housing) (pop. 70,573)0.1%
98.
Loomis Basin-Folsom Lake, CA (housing) (pop. 89,014)0.1%
99.
South Bay Cities, CA (housing) (pop. 134,363)0.1%
100.
Greenburgh, NY (housing) (pop. 88,400)0.1%
101.
East Jefferson, TX (housing) (pop. 111,383)0.1%
Also check out our website just for ranking top lists with best, worst, and most of everything: ShareRanks.com.
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.