Compare the Top Fuzz Testing Tools as of April 2025

What are Fuzz Testing Tools?

Fuzz testing tools are automated software tools used to detect bugs and vulnerabilities in computer systems. They generate large amounts of random input data to test the robustness of a system. These tools are commonly used in software development to enhance the quality and security of a product. Fuzz testing tools can be applied to various types of systems, including web applications, mobile apps, and operating systems. They have become an essential part of the testing process in modern software development due to their ability to uncover hidden flaws that traditional testing methods may miss. Compare and read user reviews of the best Fuzz Testing tools currently available using the table below. This list is updated regularly.

  • 1
    beSTORM

    beSTORM

    Beyond Security (Fortra)

    Discover code weaknesses and certify the security strength of any product without access to source code. Test any protocol or hardware with beSTORM, even those used in IoT, process control, CANbus compatible automotive and aerospace. Realtime fuzzing, doesn’t need access to the source code, no cases to download. One platform, one GUI to learn, with over 250+ prebuilt protocol testing modules and the ability to add custom and proprietary ones. Find the security weaknesses before deployment that are most often discovered by external actors after release. Certify vendor components and your own applications in your own testing center. Self-learning software module and propriety software testing. Customization and scalability for any business sizes up or down. Automatically generate and deliver near-infinite attack vectors and document any product failures. Record every pass/fail and hand engineering the exact command that produced each fail.
    Starting Price: $50,000.00/one-time
  • 2
    PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
    Hands-on security testers need the best tools for the job. Tools you have faith in, and enjoy using all day long. The tools that other professionals trust. Burp Suite Professional is the web security tester's toolkit of choice. Use it to automate repetitive testing tasks, then dig deeper with its expert-designed manual and semi-automated security testing tools. Burp Suite Professional can help you to test for OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities, as well as the very latest hacking techniques. Smart automation works in concert with expert-designed manual tools, to save you time. Optimize your workflow, and do more of what you do best. Burp Scanner can navigate and scan JavaScript-heavy single-page applications (SPAs), scan APIs, and enable the prerecording of complex authentication sequences. A toolkit designed and used by professional testers. Utilize features like the ability to record everything you did on an engagement and a powerful search function to improve efficiency and reliability.
    Starting Price: $449 per year
  • 3
    Peach Fuzzer

    Peach Fuzzer

    Peach Tech

    Peach is a SmartFuzzer that is capable of performing both generation and mutation-based fuzzing. Peach requires the creation of Peach Pit files that define the structure, type information, and relationships in the data to be fuzzed. It additionally allows for the configuration of a fuzzing run including selecting a data transport (publisher), logging interface, etc. Peach has been under active development since 2004 and is in its third major version. Fuzzing continues to be the fastest way to find security issues and test for bugs. Effective hardware fuzzing with Peach will introduce students to the fundamentals of device fuzzing. Peach was designed to fuzz any type of data consumer from servers to embedded devices. Researchers, corporations, and governments already use Peach to find vulnerabilities in hardware. This course will focus on using Peach to target embedded devices and collect information from the device in the event of a crash.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 4
    Etheno

    Etheno

    Crytic

    Etheno is an Ethereum-testing, JSON RPC multiplexer, analysis tool wrapper, and test integration tool. It eliminates the complexity of setting up analysis tools like Echidna on large, multi-contract projects. If you are a smart contract developer, you should use Etheno to test your contracts. If you are an Ethereum client developer, you should use Etheno to perform differential testing on your implementation. Etheno runs a JSON RPC server that can multiplex calls to one or more clients. API for filtering and modifying JSON RPC calls. Enables differential testing by sending JSON RPC sequences to multiple Ethereum clients. Deploy to and interact with multiple networks at the same time. Integration with test frameworks like Ganache and Truffle. Run a local test network with a single command. Use our prebuilt Docker container to quickly install and try Etheno. Etheno can be used in many different ways and therefore, has numerous command-line argument combinations.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 5
    Solidity Fuzzing Boilerplate
    Solidity Fuzzing Boilerplate is a template repository intended to ease fuzzing components of Solidity projects, especially libraries. Write tests once and run them with both Echidna and Foundry's fuzzing. Fuzz components that use incompatible Solidity versions by deploying those into a Ganache instance via Etheno. Use HEVM's FFI cheat code to generate complex fuzzing inputs or to compare outputs with non-EVM executables while doing differential fuzzing. Publish your fuzzing experiments without worrying about licensing by extending the shell script to download specific files. Turn off FFI if you don't intend to make use of shell commands from your Solidity contracts. Note that FFI is slow and should only be used as a workaround. It can be useful for testing against things that are difficult to implement within Solidity and already exist in other languages. Before executing tests of a project that has FFI enabled, be sure to check what commands are actually being executed.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 6
    hevm

    hevm

    DappHub

    The hevm project is an implementation of the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) made specifically for symbolic execution, unit testing, and debugging of smart contracts. It is developed by DappHub and integrates especially well with the DappHub tool suite. The hevm command line program can symbolically execute smart contracts, run unit tests, interactively debug contracts while showing the Solidity source, or run arbitrary EVM code. Computations can be performed using a local state set up in a testing harness or fetched on demand from live networks using RPC calls. Run a symbolic execution against the given parameters, searching for assertion violations. One can also specialize specific arguments to a function signature while leaving others abstract. hevm uses an eager approach for symbolic execution, meaning that it will first attempt to explore all branches of the program.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 7
    Tayt

    Tayt

    Crytic

    Tayt is a StarkNet smart contract fuzzer. We recommend using a Python virtual environment. When starting you will see the properties to be checked and the external functions used to generate a sequence of transactions. Eventually, if a property is violated a call sequence will be presented with the order of functions to be called, the respective arguments passed, the caller address, and the events emitted. With Tayt, you can test a contract that deploys other contracts.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 8
    ImmuneBytes

    ImmuneBytes

    ImmuneBytes

    Fortify your blockchains with our impeccable audit services for unparalleled security in the decentralized realm. If you're spending sleepless nights worrying about losing funds to hackers, choose from our stack of services, and bid farewell to all your fears. In-depth analysis of the code by industry veterans to detect the vulnerabilities in your smart contract. Our experts secure your blockchain applications by mitigating risks through security design, assessment, audit, and compliance services. Our independent team of prolific penetration testers performs an extensive exercise to detect vulnerabilities and system exploits. We are the torch-bearers of making the space safer for everyone and do it by helping with a complete, systematic analysis to enhance the product's overall security. Recovery of funds is as equally important as a security audit. Have the facility to track user funds with our transaction risk monitoring system and boost users' confidence.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 9
    Google OSS-Fuzz
    OSS-Fuzz offers continuous fuzzing for open source software. Fuzz testing is a well-known technique for uncovering programming errors in software. Many of these detectable errors, like buffer overflow, can have serious security implications. Google has found thousands of security vulnerabilities and stability bugs by deploying guided in-process fuzzing of Chrome components, and we now want to share that service with the open source community. OSS-Fuzz aims to make common open source software more secure and stable by combining modern fuzzing techniques with scalable, distributed execution. Projects that do not qualify for OSS-Fuzz can run their own instances of ClusterFuzz or ClusterFuzzLite. Currently, OSS-Fuzz supports C/C++, Rust, Go, Python, and Java/JVM code. Other languages supported by LLVM may work too. OSS-Fuzz supports fuzzing x86_64 and i386 builds.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 10
    Fuzzing Project

    Fuzzing Project

    Fuzzing Project

    Fuzzing is a powerful strategy to find bugs in software. The idea is quite simple, which is to generate a large number of randomly malformed inputs for the software to parse and see what happens. If the program crashes then something is likely wrong. While fuzzing is a well-known strategy, it is surprisingly easy to find bugs, often with security implications, in widely used software. Memory access errors are the errors most likely to be exposed when fuzzing software that is written in C/C++. While they differ in the details, the core problem is often the same, the software reads or writes to the wrong memory locations. A modern Linux or BSD system ships a large number of basic tools that do some kind of file displaying and parsing. In their current state, most of these tools are not suitable for untrusted inputs. On the other hand, we have powerful tools these days that allow us to find and analyze these bugs.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 11
    LibFuzzer

    LibFuzzer

    LLVM Project

    LibFuzzer is an in-process, coverage-guided, evolutionary fuzzing engine. LibFuzzer is linked with the library under test, and feeds fuzzed inputs to the library via a specific fuzzing entry point (or target function); the fuzzer then tracks which areas of the code are reached, and generates mutations on the corpus of input data in order to maximize the code coverage. The code coverage information for libFuzzer is provided by LLVM’s SanitizerCoverage instrumentation. LibFuzzer is still fully supported in that important bugs will get fixed. The first step in using libFuzzer on a library is to implement a fuzz target, a function that accepts an array of bytes and does something interesting with these bytes using the API under test. Note that this fuzz target does not depend on libFuzzer in any way so it is possible and even desirable to use it with other fuzzing engines like AFL and/or Radamsa.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 12
    american fuzzy lop
    American fuzzy lop is a security-oriented fuzzer that employs a novel type of compile-time instrumentation and genetic algorithms to automatically discover clean, interesting test cases that trigger new internal states in the targeted binary. This substantially improves the functional coverage for the fuzzed code. The compact synthesized corpora produced by the tool are also useful for seeding other, more labor or resource-intensive testing regimes down the road. Compared to other instrumented fuzzers, afl-fuzz is designed to be practical, it has a modest performance overhead, uses a variety of highly effective fuzzing strategies and effort minimization tricks, requires essentially no configuration, and seamlessly handles complex, real-world use cases, say, common image parsing or file compression libraries. It's an instrumentation-guided genetic fuzzer capable of synthesizing complex file semantics in a wide range of non-trivial targets.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 13
    Honggfuzz
    Honggfuzz is a security-oriented software fuzzer. Supports evolutionary, feedback-driven fuzzing based on code coverage (SW and HW-based). It’s multi-process and multi-threaded, there’s no need to run multiple copies of your fuzzer, as Honggfuzz can unlock the potential of all your available CPU cores with a single running instance. The file corpus is automatically shared and improved between all fuzzed processes. It’s blazingly fast when the persistent fuzzing mode is used. A simple/empty LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput function can be tested with up to 1mo iteration per second on a relatively modern CPU. Has a solid track record of uncovered security bugs, the only (to date) vulnerability in OpenSSL with the critical score mark was discovered by Honggfuzz. As opposed to other fuzzers, it will discover and report hijacked/ignored signals from crashes (intercepted and potentially hidden by a fuzzed program).
    Starting Price: Free
  • 14
    Ffuf

    Ffuf

    Ffuf

    Ffuf is a fast web fuzzer written in Go. You can also practice your Ffuf scans against a live host with different lessons and use cases either locally by using the Docker container or against the live-hosted version. Provides virtual host discovery (without DNS records). In order to tell Ffuf about different inputs to test out, a wordlist is needed. You can supply one or more wordlists on the command line, and in case you wish (or are using multiple wordlists) you can choose a custom keyword for them. You can supply Ffuf with multiple wordlists (remember to configure a custom keyword for them though). The first word of the first wordlist is tested against all the words from the second wordlist before moving along to test the second word in the first wordlist against all the words in the second wordlist. In short, all of the different combinations are tried out. There are quite a few different ways to customize the request.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 15
    ToothPicker

    ToothPicker

    Secure Mobile Networking Lab

    ToothPicker is an in-process, coverage-guided fuzzer for iOS. It was developed to specifically target iOS's Bluetooth daemon and to analyze various Bluetooth protocols on iOS. As it is built using FRIDA, it can be adapted to target any platform that runs FRIDA. This repository also includes an over-the-air fuzzer with an exemplary implementation to fuzz Apple's MagicPairing protocol using InternalBlue. Additionally, it contains the ReplayCrashFile script that can be used to verify crashes the in-process fuzzer has found. This is a very simple fuzzer that only flips bits and bytes of inactive connections. No coverage, no injection, but nice as a demo and stateful. Runs just with Python and Frida, no modules or installation are required. ToothPicker is built on the codebase of frizzer. It is recommended to set up a virtual Python environment for frizzer. Starting from the iPhone XR/Xs, PAC has been introduced.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 16
    afl-unicorn

    afl-unicorn

    Battelle

    afl-unicorn lets you fuzz any piece of binary that can be emulated by Unicorn Engine. If you can emulate the code you’re interested in using the Unicorn Engine, you can fuzz it with afl-unicorn. Unicorn Mode works by implementing the block-edge instrumentation that AFL’s QEMU mode normally does into Unicorn Engine. Basically, AFL will use block coverage information from any emulated code snippet to drive its input generation. The whole idea revolves around the proper construction of a Unicorn-based test harness. The Unicorn-based test harness loads the target code, sets up the initial state, and loads in data mutated by AFL from disk. The test harness then emulates the target binary code, and if it detects that a crash or error occurred it throws a signal. AFL will do all its normal stuff, but it’s actually fuzzing the emulated target binary code. Only tested on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, but it should work smoothly with any OS capable of running both AFL and Unicorn.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 17
    Fuzzbuzz

    Fuzzbuzz

    Fuzzbuzz

    The Fuzzbuzz workflow is very similar to other CI/CD testing workflows. However, unlike other testing workflows, fuzz testing requires multiple jobs to run simultaneously, which results in a few extra steps. Fuzzbuzz is a fuzz testing platform. We make it trivial for developers to add fuzz tests to their code and run them in CI/CD, helping them catch critical bugs and vulnerabilities before they hit production. Fuzzbuzz completely integrates into your environment, following you from the terminal to CI/CD. Write a fuzz test in your environment and use your own IDE, terminal, or build tools. Push to CI/CD and Fuzzbuzz will automatically start running your fuzz tests against your latest code changes. Get notified when bugs are found through Slack, GitHub, or email. Catch regressions as new changes are automatically tested and compared to previous runs. Code is built and instrumented by Fuzzbuzz as soon as a change is detected.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 18
    Sulley

    Sulley

    OpenRCE

    Sulley is a fuzzing engine and fuzz testing framework consisting of multiple extensible components. Sulley (IMHO) exceeds the capabilities of most previously published fuzzing technologies, commercial and public domain. The goal of the framework is to simplify not only data representation but to simplify data transmission and instrumentation. A pure-Python fully automated and unattended fuzzing framework. Sulley not only has impressive data generation but has taken this a step further and includes many other important aspects a modern fuzzer should provide. Sulley watches the network and methodically maintains records. Sulley instruments and monitors the health of the target, capable of reverting to a known good state using multiple methods. Sulley detects, tracks, and categorizes detected faults. Sulley can fuzz in parallel, significantly increasing test speed. Sulley can automatically determine what unique sequence of test cases triggers faults.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 19
    Radamsa

    Radamsa

    Aki Helin

    Radamsa is a test case generator for robustness testing or fuzzer. It is typically used to test how well a program can withstand malformed and potentially malicious inputs. It works by reading sample files of valid data and generating interestingly different outputs from them. The main selling points of Radamsa are that it has already found a slew of bugs in programs that actually matter, it is easily scriptable, and, easy to get up and running. Fuzzing is one of the techniques to find unexpected behavior in programs. The idea is simply to subject the program to various kinds of inputs and see what happens. There are two parts to this process: getting the various kinds of inputs and how to see what happens. Radamsa is a solution to the first part, and the second part is typically a short shell script. Testers usually have a more or less vague idea of what should not happen, and they try to find out if this is so.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 20
    Jazzer

    Jazzer

    Code Intelligence

    Jazzer is a coverage-guided, in-process fuzzer for the JVM platform developed by Code Intelligence. It is based on libFuzzer and brings many of its instrumentation-powered mutation features to the JVM. You can use Docker to try out Jazzer's autofuzz mode, which automatically generates arguments to a given Java function and reports unexpected exceptions and detected security issues. You can also use GitHub release archives to run a standalone Jazzer binary that starts its own JVM configured for fuzzing.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 21
    FuzzDB

    FuzzDB

    FuzzDB

    FuzzDB was created to increase the likelihood of finding application security vulnerabilities through dynamic application security testing. It's the first and most comprehensive open dictionary of fault injection patterns, predictable resource locations, and regex for matching server responses. FuzzDB contains comprehensive lists of attack payload primitives for fault injection testing. These patterns, categorized by the attack and where appropriate platform type, are known to cause issues like OS command injection, directory listings, directory traversals, source exposure, file upload bypass, authentication bypass, XSS, HTTP header crlf injections, SQL injection, NoSQL injection, and more. For example, FuzzDB catalogs 56 patterns that can potentially be interpreted as a null byte and contains lists of commonly used methods and name-value pairs that trigger debug modes.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 22
    Google ClusterFuzz
    ClusterFuzz is a scalable fuzzing infrastructure that finds security and stability issues in software. Google uses ClusterFuzz to fuzz all Google products and as the fuzzing backend for OSS-Fuzz. ClusterFuzz provides many features to seamlessly integrate fuzzing into a software project’s development process. Fully automatic bug filing, triage, and closing for various issue trackers. Supports multiple coverages guided fuzzing engines for optimal results (with ensemble fuzzing and fuzzing strategies). Statistics for analyzing fuzzer performance, and crash rates. Easy to use web interface for management and viewing crashes. Support for various authentication providers using Firebase. Support for black-box fuzzing, test case minimization, and regression finding through bisection.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 23
    go-fuzz

    go-fuzz

    dvyukov

    Go-fuzz is a coverage-guided fuzzing solution for testing Go packages. Fuzzing is mainly applicable to packages that parse complex inputs (both text and binary) and is especially useful for hardening systems that parse inputs from potentially malicious users (anything accepted over a network). go-fuzz has recently added preliminary support for fuzzing Go Modules. If you encounter a problem with modules, please file an issue with details. Data is a random input generated by go-fuzz, note that in most cases it is invalid. The function must return 1 if the fuzzer should increase the priority of the given input during subsequent fuzzing if the input must not be added to the corpus even if it gives new coverage, and 0 otherwise; other values are reserved for future use. The fuzz function must be in a package that go-fuzz can import. This means the code you want to test can't be in package main. Fuzzing internal packages is supported, however.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 24
    Wfuzz

    Wfuzz

    Wfuzz

    Wfuzz provides a framework to automate web application security assessments and could help you secure your web applications by finding and exploiting web application vulnerabilities. You can also run Wfuzz from the official Docker image. Wfuzz is based on the simple concept that it replaces any reference to the fuzz keyword with the value of a given payload. A payload in Wfuzz is a source of data. This simple concept allows any input to be injected in any field of an HTTP request, allowing it to perform complex web security attacks in different web application components such as parameters, authentication, forms, directories/files, headers, etc. Wfuzz’s web application vulnerability scanner is supported by plugins. Wfuzz is a completely modular framework and makes it easy for even the newest Python developers to contribute. Building plugins is simple and takes little more than a few minutes.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 25
    Fuzzapi

    Fuzzapi

    Fuzzapi

    Fuzzapi is a tool used for REST API pentesting and uses API Fuzzer and provides UI solutions for gem.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 26
    Wapiti

    Wapiti

    Wapiti

    Wapiti is a web application vulnerability scanner. Wapiti allows you to audit the security of your websites or web applications. It performs "black-box" scans (it does not study the source code) of the web application by crawling the webpages of the deployed web app, looking for scripts and forms where it can inject data. Once it gets the list of URLs, forms, and their inputs, Wapiti acts like a fuzzer, injecting payloads to see if a script is vulnerable. Search for potentially dangerous files on the server. Wapiti supports both GET and POST HTTP methods for attacks. It also supports multipart forms and can inject payloads in filenames (upload). Warnings are raised when an anomaly is found (for example 500 errors and timeouts). Wapiti is able to make the difference between permanent and reflected XSS vulnerabilities. Generates vulnerability reports in various formats (HTML, XML, JSON, TXT, CSV).
    Starting Price: Free
  • 27
    Echidna

    Echidna

    Crytic

    Echidna is a Haskell program designed for fuzzing/property-based testing of Ethereum smart contracts. It uses sophisticated grammar-based fuzzing campaigns based on a contract ABI to falsify user-defined predicates or Solidity assertions. We designed Echidna with modularity in mind, so it can be easily extended to include new mutations or test specific contracts in specific cases. Generates inputs tailored to your actual code. Optional corpus collection, mutation and coverage guidance to find deeper bugs. Powered by Slither to extract useful information before the fuzzing campaign. Source code integration to identify which lines are covered after the fuzzing campaign. Interactive terminal UI, text-only or JSON output. Automatic test case minimization for quick triage. Seamless integration into the development workflow. Maximum gas usage reporting of the fuzzing campaign. Support for a complex contract initialization with Etheno and Truffle.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 28
    syzkaller
    syzkaller is an unsupervised coverage-guided kernel fuzzer. Supports FreeBSD, Fuchsia, gVisor, Linux, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and Windows. Initially, syzkaller was developed with Linux kernel fuzzing in mind, but now it's being extended to support other OS kernels as well. Once syzkaller detects a kernel crash in one of the VMs, it will automatically start the process of reproducing this crash. By default, it will use 4 VMs to reproduce the crash and then minimize the program that caused it. This may stop the fuzzing, since all of the VMs might be busy reproducing detected crashes. The process of reproducing one crash may take from a few minutes up to an hour depending on whether the crash is easily reproducible or non-reproducible at all.
    Starting Price: Free
  • 29
    Black Duck

    Black Duck

    Black Duck

    Black Duck, part of the Synopsys Software Integrity Group, is a leading provider of application security testing (AST) solutions. Their comprehensive portfolio includes tools for static analysis, software composition analysis (SCA), dynamic analysis, and interactive analysis, enabling organizations to identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities throughout the software development life cycle. By automating the discovery and management of open-source software, Black Duck ensures compliance with security and licensing standards. Their solutions are designed to help organizations build trust in their software by managing application security, quality, and compliance risks at the speed their business demands. Black Duck empowers businesses to innovate securely and deliver software with confidence.
  • 30
    Awesome Fuzzing
    Awesome Fuzzing is a list of fuzzing resources including books, courses, both free and paid, videos, tools, tutorials, and vulnerable applications to practice in order to learn fuzzing and initial phases of exploit development like root cause analysis. Courses/training videos on fuzzing, videos talking about fuzzing techniques, tools, and best practices. Conference talks and tutorials, blogs, tools that help in fuzzing applications, and fuzzers that help in fuzzing applications that use network-based protocols like HTTP, SSH, SMTP, etc. Search and pick the exploits, that have respective apps available for download, and reproduce the exploit by using the fuzzer of your choice. Set of tests for fuzzing engines. Includes different well-known bugs. A corpus, including various file formats for fuzzing multiple targets in the fuzzing literature.
    Starting Price: Free
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • 2
  • Next

Fuzz Testing Tools Guide

Fuzz testing, also known as fuzzing, is a software testing technique that involves providing invalid, unexpected or random data to an application or system in order to identify potential vulnerabilities and bugs. It is a form of automated black-box testing that aims to find security flaws and coding errors by inputting malformed data into a tool.

Fuzz testing tools are tools specifically designed to carry out the process of fuzzing. These tools automate the generation and execution of test cases for fuzzing purposes, making the process more efficient and thorough compared to manual fuzzing.

There are various types of fuzz testing tools available, with some being open source and free while others are commercial products. Most of these tools come with features such as custom mutation engines, intelligent scanning capabilities, and compatibility with different operating systems and programming languages.

One example of a popular open source fuzz testing tool is American Fuzzy Lop (AFL). AFL uses genetic algorithms to generate new test cases based on previous inputs. This allows it to quickly identify common patterns in the tool's response and generate more targeted test cases. Another popular tool is Peach Fuzzer, which has been used extensively in security research and discovered numerous vulnerabilities in major software applications.

Another type of fuzzing tool is called coverage-guided fuzzer. These tools use code coverage information to guide their mutation process towards uncovered areas of the codebase. This approach can help uncover deep-seated vulnerabilities that may not be found through traditional means.

Some commercial fuzzing tools also offer features like support for binary protocols, integration with continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, advanced reporting capabilities, and team collaboration features. Some examples include Codenomicon Defensics by Synopsys and Microsoft's own Project Springfield.

Apart from traditional standalone tools, there are also cloud-based fuzzing services available which allow users to remotely run large-scale fuzz tests on their applications using multiple machines simultaneously. This eliminates the need for users to have powerful hardware and can significantly speed up the fuzzing process.

Fuzz testing tools can be used for various purposes, such as identifying vulnerabilities in software applications, testing compatibility with different operating systems or environments, and discovering unexpected failures or crashes. They are especially useful for detecting security flaws in critical systems that handle sensitive data, such as financial transactions or personal information.

One of the main advantages of using fuzz testing tools is their ability to find bugs that may not be discovered through traditional testing methods. By inputting malformed and unexpected data, these tools can uncover coding errors and vulnerabilities that may go unnoticed during manual testing.

Moreover, fuzzing tools also help save time and resources by automating the process of creating and executing test cases. This allows developers to focus on fixing the identified issues instead of spending time manually generating test inputs.

However, like any other form of automated testing, fuzzing tools also have limitations. These include the possibility of missing certain types of vulnerabilities or producing false positives due to their reliance on predefined mutation patterns. It is important for developers to understand these limitations and use fuzzing tools in conjunction with other testing techniques for a more comprehensive approach to software security.

Fuzz testing tools are essential for modern application development processes. They provide an efficient way to identify bugs and vulnerabilities that may not be uncovered through traditional methods. With their advanced features and capabilities, these tools play a crucial role in ensuring the security and stability of software applications.

Features of Fuzz Testing Tools

Fuzz testing tools are designed to evaluate the security and stability of a software or system by providing a range of features such as:

  1. Input Generation: This feature allows users to generate a wide variety of input data for the target software or system, including invalid or unexpected inputs. These inputs can be randomized or customized based on specific parameters.
  2. Mutation Testing: Fuzzing tools use mutation techniques to modify existing input data in order to create new test cases. This helps in uncovering vulnerabilities that may not have been identified with traditional testing methods.
  3. Code Coverage Analysis: Fuzzers often provide code coverage analysis, which tracks the portions of code being executed during the fuzzing process. This helps in identifying uncovered areas that may need further testing.
  4. Crash Reporting: When a crash occurs during fuzz testing, these tools provide detailed reports on what caused the crash, including information such as memory addresses, stack traces, and other relevant data. This makes it easier for developers to fix the issue.
  5. Automated Test Execution: Fuzzers offer automated test execution capabilities, saving time and effort by eliminating the need for manual execution of test cases.
  6. Integration with Debugging Tools: Most fuzzing tools integrate with popular debugging tools such as GDB and WinDbg, allowing developers to analyze crashes further with advanced debugging features.
  7. Network Protocol Support: Some fuzzers are specifically designed for evaluating network protocols and communication channels between different systems by simulating real-world network traffic.
  8. Vulnerability Detection: Fuzz testers can identify various types of vulnerabilities such as buffer overflows, format string vulnerabilities, integer overflows, SQL injections, cross-site scripting (XSS), among others.
  9. Customizable Configuration Options: Users can customize various settings such as choosing specific mutation techniques or defining input generation parameters according to their needs.
  10. Scalability and Performance: Many fuzzers support distributed computing environments, making it possible to run multiple test cases simultaneously and increasing the overall performance and scalability of the testing process.
  11. Reporting and Analysis: Fuzzing tools provide comprehensive reports and analysis on detected vulnerabilities, including details such as severity levels, affected code areas, and suggestions for remediation.
  12. Cross-Platform Support: With more software being developed for multiple platforms, fuzzers offer cross-platform support to enable testing on different operating systems and architectures.
  13. Continuous Fuzzing: Some tools offer continuous fuzzing capabilities by automatically running tests against new versions of the software or system, ensuring ongoing security evaluations.
  14. Integration with CI/CD pipelines: Fuzzers can be integrated into continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines to detect security vulnerabilities early in the development process and prevent them from reaching production environments.

Fuzz testing tools provide a range of features that make them essential in identifying potential security flaws and improving the overall stability of software. By generating a diverse set of inputs and using advanced techniques to mutate data, these tools help developers identify vulnerabilities that may have been missed by traditional testing methods. With automated test execution, code coverage analysis, crash reporting, customizable configuration options, scalability support, among others, fuzzers are powerful tools for detecting potential weaknesses in software applications before they can be exploited by attackers.

Types of Fuzz Testing Tools

Fuzz testing, also known as fuzzing or fault injection, is a software testing technique that involves providing invalid, unexpected, or random data to a software in order to identify coding errors and security vulnerabilities. Fuzz testing tools are automated tools designed specifically for this purpose, which can help improve the overall quality and security of software.

There are several different types of fuzz testing tools available in the market today. Some of the most commonly used ones include:

  • Protocol-based fuzzers: These tools work by sending malformed network packets to test the robustness of communication protocols such as HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc. They can detect issues such as buffer overflows and command injections.
  • File format-based fuzzers: These tools focus on file formats like PDF, DOCX, JPEG, etc., by injecting random data into their structures to uncover vulnerabilities related to parsing and handling of these file types.
  • Mutation-based fuzzers: These are one of the simplest forms of fuzz testing tools that work by taking valid inputs and altering them with random mutations to generate invalid inputs. The goal is to trigger crashes or exceptions in the software being tested.
  • Generation-based fuzzers: Unlike mutation-based tools that modify existing inputs, generation-based fuzzers create completely new input combinations based on predefined grammar rules or templates. This makes them more effective in finding deeper bugs in complex systems.
  • Coverage-guided fuzzers: These advanced tools use techniques like code coverage analysis to measure how much code has been executed during a test run. Based on this information, they generate new inputs that target previously unexplored areas within the codebase.
  • Hybrid/hybrid intelligent fuzzers: These are hybrid approaches that combine multiple techniques such as generation and mutation for better results. Some even incorporate machine learning algorithms to intelligently generate input combinations based on previous findings.

In addition to these categories, there are also other factors that differentiate fuzz testing tools from each other, such as their level of automation, platform compatibility, and support for fuzzing at different stages of the software development lifecycle.

Each type of fuzz testing tool has its own strengths and limitations. Therefore, it is important to select the right one based on the specific requirements and environment of the software being tested. Additionally, it is recommended to use a combination of different types of fuzzers to achieve maximum coverage and effectiveness in detecting bugs and vulnerabilities.

Fuzz Testing Tools Advantages

  • Automated detection of vulnerabilities: Fuzz testing tools use automated techniques to generate a large number of test inputs, which increases the likelihood of detecting potential vulnerabilities in software. This saves time and effort compared to manual testing.
  • Increased code coverage: Fuzz testing tools are able to generate a wide range of input values, including invalid, unexpected, and boundary values, resulting in increased code coverage. This allows for the identification of unexplored paths in the code that may contain bugs.
  • Reduced cost: By automating the testing process, fuzz testing tools can save organizations money by reducing the need for manual testers and minimizing the time spent on testing. This also allows for more frequent and thorough testing without increasing costs.
  • Scalability: Fuzzing tools can be easily scaled up to handle large amounts of data and complex software systems. This makes them suitable for testing complex applications with multiple layers or interfaces.
  • Early detection of bugs: Fuzzing can be integrated into the development process at an early stage, allowing for detection and remediation of bugs before they become bigger problems. This can save organizations time and resources by avoiding costly fixes later on in the development cycle.
  • Realistic simulation of user behavior: Fuzzing mimics real-world inputs that a user might provide to an application. As a result, it can simulate more realistic scenarios which could potentially lead to discovering critical vulnerabilities that may not have been found using traditional methods.
  • Platform independence: Most fuzzing tools are platform-independent and can be run on various operating systems without modifications. This flexibility enables developers to test their applications across different platforms quickly and easily.
  • Continuous testing: Some fuzzing tools allow continuous integration with build processes, enabling automated security checks during each build cycle. This keeps developers informed about potential security issues throughout the development process.
  • Customization options: Many fuzzing tools offer customizable features such as setting specific test parameters or targeted areas within an application. This allows testers to tailor the fuzzing process to their specific needs and focus on areas of the code that are more likely to contain vulnerabilities.
  • Easy identification of root cause: Fuzz testing tools often provide detailed reports and logs that identify the root cause of a vulnerability, making it easier for developers to fix the issue. This saves time and improves efficiency by avoiding the need for manual debugging.

What Types of Users Use Fuzz Testing Tools?

Fuzz testing, also known as fuzzing, is a software testing technique that involves sending invalid or unexpected inputs to a software in order to find bugs and vulnerabilities. The goal of fuzzing is to uncover potential security issues and improve the overall reliability of the software.

There are several types of fuzz testing tools available in the market today. These tools vary in terms of their capabilities, flexibility, and target applications. Some common types include:

  1. File Fuzzers: These tools test for vulnerabilities by manipulating the file formats accepted by an application. They generate malformed files and feed them into the target tool to see how it responds.
  2. Protocol Fuzzers: These tools focus on testing network protocols such as HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc. They send malformed data packets over the network to detect bugs or unexpected behaviors in server-side or client-side applications.
  3. Web Fuzzers: These are specialized tools designed for web applications and APIs. They crawl through web pages and forms looking for input fields where they can inject malicious data.
  4. Mutation Fuzzers: This type of tool modifies existing valid inputs by randomly changing characters, numbers, or bytes within the input string to create malformed data.
  5. Generation Fuzzers: Unlike mutation fuzzers that modify existing inputs, generation fuzzers create new inputs from scratch based on grammar rules specified by the user.
  6. Intelligence-Based Fuzzers: These advanced fuzzing tools use machine learning algorithms to learn from previously generated inputs and generate more intelligent tests that have a higher probability of finding bugs.
  7. Differential Fuzzers: This type of tool compares two different versions of a tool with similar inputs to reveal discrepancies between their outputs that could potentially indicate bugs.
  8. AFL (American fuzzy lop) Tools: AFL is one of the most popular open source fuzzer frameworks used for black-box bug hunting and vulnerability detection through code coverage analysis.
  9. Hybrid Fuzzers: These tools combine multiple fuzzing techniques to generate a more comprehensive set of tests and increase the chances of finding bugs.
  10. Hardware Fuzzers: These are specialized tools designed for hardware devices such as routers, IoT devices, etc. They send invalid inputs to these devices and monitor their response to uncover potential vulnerabilities.

Fuzz testing has become an essential part of software development and security testing process due to its effectiveness in detecting bugs and vulnerabilities that would be difficult to find through traditional testing methods. With the variety of fuzz testing tools available, developers and security teams can choose the most appropriate tool depending on their specific needs and target applications.

How Much Do Fuzz Testing Tools Cost?

Fuzz testing tools, also known as fuzzers or fuzzing software, are automated software testing tools that use random or invalid data inputs to stress test a software. This type of testing is commonly used to find vulnerabilities and bugs in software systems.

The cost of fuzz testing tools can vary greatly depending on the specific tool and its features. Some open source fuzzers are available for free, while commercial options can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars.

Open source fuzzers, such as AFL (American Fuzzy Lop) and libFuzzer, are popular choices for those looking for a free option. These tools have been used successfully by major companies like Google and Microsoft and have large communities supporting them. However, they typically require more technical know-how to set up and use effectively.

Commercial fuzzing tools often offer more advanced features and support, making them suitable for larger organizations or companies with specific requirements. Prices for these tools can start at a few hundred dollars per user license but can quickly reach thousands of dollars depending on the number of users and additional services needed.

Some popular commercial options include Peach Fuzzer, which starts at $500 per user license, Parasoft C/C++test which starts at $4,000 per user license, and Codenomicon Defensics which offers customized pricing based on the organization's needs.

In addition to one-time licenses fees, many commercial fuzzing tools also require yearly maintenance fees or subscriptions for continued support and updates. These costs can range from a few hundred dollars to several thousand depending on the tool and provider.

Investing in a fuzzer is an important decision that should be made carefully after considering the specific needs and budget of an organization. While open source options may be suitable for smaller businesses or individual developers, larger organizations may benefit from the advanced features and support offered by commercial options despite their higher costs.

Additionally, it's worth noting that some companies may choose to develop their own in-house fuzzing tools to specifically meet their needs. This can also be a cost-effective option, but it requires significant time and resources to build and maintain the tool.

The cost of fuzz testing tools can vary significantly depending on factors such as features, support, and maintenance fees. It's important for organizations to carefully evaluate their options and consider their budget before investing in a fuzzer.

Fuzz Testing Tools Integrations

Fuzz testing tools, also known as fuzzers, are software testing tools that automate the process of injecting invalid or unexpected data into a tool in order to find vulnerabilities and bugs. These tools can be used to test a wide range of software, including desktop applications, web applications, mobile apps, and even operating systems.

  1. Web Applications: Fuzz testing tools are commonly used to test web applications such as online shopping websites, social media platforms, and online banking systems. These tools can be integrated with popular web development frameworks like AngularJS and ReactJS.
  2. Mobile Apps: Fuzzing can also be applied to mobile app development. Tools like Android Monkey and iOS Monkey have been developed specifically for fuzz testing mobile apps on Android and iOS platforms respectively.
  3. Operating Systems: Fuzz testing can be used to test operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and MacOS. These tests help identify security flaws or vulnerabilities that could compromise the stability of these systems.
  4. Database Management Systems (DBMS): DBMSs store sensitive data like personal information and financial records making them potential targets for cyber attacks. Fuzzing DBMSs helps identify weaknesses in their security protocols that could lead to data breaches.
  5. Network Protocols: Network protocols such as HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc., are critical for communication over the internet. Integration of fuzz testing tools with network protocol analyzers allows identification of vulnerabilities that could potentially disrupt communication or compromise sensitive information being transmitted.
  6. APIs: Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are interfaces that allow different tools to communicate with each other. Fuzzing APIs helps ensure their proper functionality by discovering any discrepancies between expected input/output behavior.
  7. Network Security Tools: Vulnerability scanners, intrusion detection systems (IDS), firewalls, etc., often use fuzzing techniques during their operation to detect potential threats on computer networks.
  8. Middleware Software: Middleware is software that acts as a bridge between an operating system or database and applications. Fuzz testing can be incorporated into middleware testing to check for vulnerabilities in data processing and communication.
  9. Gaming Software: Fuzz testing tools are also used to test gaming software, including video games, mobile games, and console games. These tests help identify bugs that could affect gameplay or compromise user experience.
  10. Internet of Things (IoT) Devices: As the number of connected devices continues to grow, so does the need for proper security protocols. Fuzzing can be used to test IoT devices and their communication protocols for potential vulnerabilities that could lead to privacy breaches or cyber attacks.

Fuzz testing tools can integrate with a wide range of software types beyond traditional desktop applications, making them an essential tool in identifying and mitigating software vulnerabilities and maintaining overall system stability.

Trends Related to Fuzz Testing Tools

  • Fuzz testing tools have become increasingly popular in recent years due to the rise of software vulnerabilities and security breaches.
  • With the rapid growth of technology and the increasing complexity of software systems, traditional methods of testing have become inadequate, making fuzz testing a necessary addition to the software development process.
  • The demand for fuzz testing tools has also increased as organizations recognize the need for robust and secure software to protect their sensitive data and maintain their reputation.
  • The use of open source software has also contributed to the popularity of fuzz testing tools as they offer affordable alternatives to proprietary solutions.
  • The emergence of continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) practices in software development has further fueled the demand for fuzz testing tools. These tools can be integrated into the CI/CD pipeline, allowing for automated and continuous testing throughout the development process.
  • Additionally, advancements in machine learning and artificial intelligence have led to the development of smarter fuzzing techniques that can identify complex vulnerabilities faster than traditional methods.
  • Fuzz testing tools are now more user-friendly with intuitive interfaces, making them accessible even to non-experts in security or programming. This has made it easier for organizations to adopt these tools into their development processes without requiring specialized skills or resources.
  • There is a growing trend towards cloud-based fuzzing services, which allow developers to quickly set up and run powerful fuzz tests without investing in expensive hardware or infrastructure. This lowers barriers to entry for smaller organizations with limited resources but still need robust security measures.

How To Choose the Right Fuzz Testing Tool

Fuzz testing, also known as fuzzing, is a software testing technique that involves sending random or invalid data to a tool in order to identify bugs and vulnerabilities. This approach can be more effective than traditional testing methods because it can uncover unexpected errors and help improve the overall security of a tool.

However, selecting the right fuzz testing tools is crucial for successful and efficient testing. Here are some steps to help you choose the right fuzz testing tools:

  1. Identify your needs: The first step in selecting the right fuzz testing tools is to identify your specific needs. Consider factors such as the type of software being tested, programming languages used, level of complexity, and potential vulnerabilities.
  2. Research available tools: There are various fuzz testing tools available in the market, so research thoroughly to find ones that match your requirements. Look at their features, user reviews, pricing models, and customer support options.
  3. Consider automation: Fuzzing requires sending large amounts of data to a tool repeatedly, which can be time-consuming if done manually. Therefore, consider tools that offer automatic generation and execution of test cases.
  4. Evaluate coverage: It's important to assess how much code coverage a tool provides. The more code coverage it offers, the higher the chances of detecting bugs and vulnerabilities.
  5. Check for compatibility: Ensure that the tool supports the programming language and environment used by your software.
  6. Look for reporting capabilities: A good fuzzing tool should provide detailed reports on identified issues with clear descriptions and recommended solutions.
  7. Take cost into account: While there are many free open source fuzzing tools available, paid commercial ones may offer more advanced features and better support options. Consider your budget when making a decision.
  8. Consider ease-of-use: Fuzzing can be a complex process; therefore, choose a tool with an intuitive interface and easy-to-understand documentation.

Compare fuzz testing tools according to cost, capabilities, integrations, user feedback, and more using the resources available on this page.