Kiuwan Code Security vs. OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. Python vs. ZeroPath Comparison Chart

OpenText Static Application Security Testing (SAST) identifies and remediates security vulnerabilities in source code early in the software development lifecycle. It supports extensive language coverage and integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Jira, and Visual Studio. The platform uses advanced static code analysis and AI-driven insights to prioritize risks and reduce false positives, enabling developers to focus on fixing critical vulnerabilities efficiently. With its customizable code analysis and rule sets, it helps reduce development time by catching issues early. OpenText SAST complies with industry standards like OWASP and offers flexible deployment options including SaaS, private cloud, and on-premises. This comprehensive approach enhances application security without sacrificing development speed or accuracy.

ZeroPath is an AI-powered security platform designed to provide developers with effortless application security. By integrating seamlessly with existing CI/CD pipelines, ZeroPath enables continuous, human-level application security and pull request (PR) reviews. The platform's AI-driven code vulnerability scanning identifies and addresses issues such as broken authentication, logic bugs, and outdated dependencies. ZeroPath's methodology includes installing their GitHub app, which supports GitHub, GitLab, and BitBucket, to facilitate quick setup. The platform excels in detecting complex vulnerabilities that other scanners may overlook, offering faster security checks with fewer false positives. Instead of merely reporting bugs, ZeroPath issues PRs with patches when confident they won't disrupt the application, reducing noise and backlog growth. The platform's features encompass Static Application Security Testing (SAST), and detection of broken authentication and business logic flaws.