DeepCover vs. Devel::Cover vs. OpenClover vs. Wing Python IDE Comparison Chart

Deep Cover aims to be the best coverage tool for Ruby code. More accurate line coverage, and branch coverage. It can be used as a drop-in replacement for the built-in Coverage library. It reports a more accurate picture of your code usage. In particular, a line is considered covered if and only if it is entirely executed. Optionally, branch coverage will detect if some branches are never taken. MRI considers every method defined, including methods defined on objects or via define_method, class_eval, etc. For Istanbul output, DeepCover has a different approach and covers all def and all blocks. DeepCover doesn't consider loops to be branches, but it's easy to support them if needed. Even after DeepCover is required and configured, only a very minimal amount of code is actually loaded and coverage is not started. To make it easier to transition for projects already using the builtin Coverage library deep-cover can inject itself into those tools.

Balance your effort spent on writing applications and test code. Use the most sophisticated code coverage tool for Java and Groovy. OpenClover measures code coverage for Java and Groovy and collects over 20 code metrics. It not only shows you untested areas of your application but also combines coverage and metrics to find the riskiest code. The Test Optimization feature tracks which test cases are related to each class of your application code. Thanks to this OpenClover can run tests relevant to changes made in your application code, significantly reducing test execution time. Do testing getters and setters bring much value? Or machine-generated code? OpenClover outruns other tools in its flexibility to define the scope of coverage measurement. You can exclude packages, files, classes, methods, and even single statements. You can focus on testing important parts of your code. OpenClover not only records test results but also measures individual code coverage for every test.