DeepCube vs. Exafunction vs. SQL vs. V Programming Language Comparison Chart

Exafunction optimizes your deep learning inference workload, delivering up to a 10x improvement in resource utilization and cost. Focus on building your deep learning application, not on managing clusters and fine-tuning performance. In most deep learning applications, CPU, I/O, and network bottlenecks lead to poor utilization of GPU hardware. Exafunction moves any GPU code to highly utilized remote resources, even spot instances. Your core logic remains an inexpensive CPU instance. Exafunction is battle-tested on applications like large-scale autonomous vehicle simulation. These workloads have complex custom models, require numerical reproducibility, and use thousands of GPUs concurrently. Exafunction supports models from major deep learning frameworks and inference runtimes. Models and dependencies like custom operators are versioned so you can always be confident you’re getting the right results.

Simple, fast, safe, and compiled. For developing maintainable software. Simple language for building maintainable programs. You can learn the entire language by going through the documentation over a weekend, and in most cases, there's only one way to do something. This results in simple, readable, and maintainable code. This results in simple, readable, and maintainable code. Despite being simple, V gives a lot of power to the developer and can be used in pretty much every field, including systems programming, webdev, gamedev, GUI, mobile, science, embedded, tooling, etc. V is very similar to Go. If you know Go, you already know 80% of V. Bounds checking, No undefined values, no variable shadowing, immutable variables by default, immutable structs by default, option/result and mandatory error checks, sum types, generics, and immutable function args by default, mutable args have to be marked on call.