CodeSonar vs. Python vs. beSOURCE vs. test_coverage Comparison Chart

CodeSonar employs a unified dataflow and symbolic execution analysis that examines the computation of the complete application. By not relying on pattern matching or similar approximations, CodeSonar's static analysis engine is extraordinarily deep, finding 3-5 times more defects on average than other static analysis tools. Unlike many software development tools, such as testing tools, compilers, configuration management, etc., SAST tools can be integrated into a team's development process at any time with ease. SAST technologies like CodeSonar simply attach to your existing build environments to add analysis information to your verification process. Like a compiler, CodeSonar does a build of your code using your existing build environment, but instead of creating object code, CodeSonar creates an abstract model of your entire program. From the derived model, CodeSonar’s symbolic execution engine explores program paths, reasoning about program variables and how they relate.

Integrate security into SDLC via potent code analysis. Security must be an integral part of software development. Historically it hasn’t been. Static application security testing (SAST) used to be divorced from Code quality reviews, resulting in limited impact and value. beSOURCE addresses the code security quality of applications and thus integrates SecOps into DevOps. Other SAST offerings look at security as an isolated function. Beyond Security has turned this model upside-down by assuming the SecOps’ perspective in addressing security from all possible angles. Security Standards. beSOURCE adheres to all pertinent standards, guiding static code analysis engine in providing an actionable reference point.