BlueClosure vs. Contrast Assess vs. JavaScript vs. OpenText Static Application Security Testing Comparison Chart

A new kind of security designed for the way software is created. Resolve security issues minutes after installation by integrating security into your toolchain. Because Contrast agents monitor code and report from inside the application, developers can finally find and fix vulnerabilities without requiring security experts. That frees up security teams to focus on providing governance. Contrast Assess deploys an intelligent agent that instruments the application with smart sensors. The code is analyzed in real time from within the application. Instrumentation minimizes the false positives that slow down developers and security teams. Resolve security issues minutes after installation by integrating security into your toolchain. Contrast Assess integrates seamlessly into the software life cycle and into the tool sets that development and operations teams are already using, including native integration with ChatOps, ticketing systems and CI/CD tools, and a RESTful API.

OpenText Static Application Security Testing (SAST) identifies and remediates security vulnerabilities in source code early in the software development lifecycle. It supports extensive language coverage and integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Jira, and Visual Studio. The platform uses advanced static code analysis and AI-driven insights to prioritize risks and reduce false positives, enabling developers to focus on fixing critical vulnerabilities efficiently. With its customizable code analysis and rule sets, it helps reduce development time by catching issues early. OpenText SAST complies with industry standards like OWASP and offers flexible deployment options including SaaS, private cloud, and on-premises. This comprehensive approach enhances application security without sacrificing development speed or accuracy.