Amazon ElastiCache vs. Apache Ignite vs. Java vs. Unlambda Comparison Chart

Use Ignite as a traditional SQL database by leveraging JDBC drivers, ODBC drivers, or the native SQL APIs that are available for Java, C#, C++, Python, and other programming languages. Seamlessly join, group, aggregate, and order your distributed in-memory and on-disk data. Accelerate your existing applications by 100x using Ignite as an in-memory cache or in-memory data grid that is deployed over one or more external databases. Think of a cache that you can query with SQL, transact, and compute on. Build modern applications that support transactional and analytical workloads by using Ignite as a database that scales beyond the available memory capacity. Ignite allocates memory for your hot data and goes to disk whenever applications query cold records. Execute kilobyte-size custom code over petabytes of data. Turn your Ignite database into a distributed supercomputer for low-latency calculations, complex analytics, and machine learning.

Unlambda is a programming language. Nothing remarkable there. The originality of Unlambda is that it stands as the unexpected intersection of two marginal families of languages. Functional programming languages, of which the canonical representative is Scheme (a Lisp dialect). This means that the basic object manipulated by the language (and indeed the only one as far as Unlambda is concerned) is the function. Rather, Unlambda uses a functional approach to programming: the only form of objects it manipulates are functions. Each function takes a function as an argument and returns a function. Apart from a binary “apply” operation, Unlambda provides several built-in functions (the most important ones being the K and S combinators). User-defined functions can be created, but not saved or named, because Unlambda does not have any variables.