postgres-xc-general Mailing List for Postgres-XC

Hi Koichi,

As of now what i am trying to do is, i want to setup pgxc for one state.
but in future this number of state will be increased upto five.

I want to take the advantage multi-master functionality as well as data
synchronization between all the states.with my application there will be
1000 of concurrent connections.

For HA i am setting GTM master and slave if required i can setup slave for
datanodes as well. from my application side i am thinking to use HearBeat
for failover.

i will only have one table in our application which will have billion of
records.

I am looking for such solution which satisfies multi-master and
high-availability
feature. this is th two feature is the main reason i want to use pgxc.

Please suggest.

Regards
Juned Khan



On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...>wrote:

> Juned;
>
> I'd like to know what kind of cluster you need to configure.  Also
> would like to know if your application is OLTP, batch or analytic, as
> well as what XC feature you'd like.   If it is OLTP, how much
> transactions your are handling and if each transaction is as simple as
> DBT-1/DBT-2 or bit more complicated as DBT-5.
>
> You're trying to add datanodes so I imaged you're trying to start
> small and then expand the cluster.   I'd like to know how your
> application is growing in size and transaction.
>
> Also, I'd like to know how much HA feature you need and what kind of
> automatic failover tool you are planning to use.
>
> They are always very important points when you choose most suitable
> database for your application.
>
> They are very important to think in advance and if you can share these
> (not what is your application, but the above characteristics), we may
> be able to provide more suitable information to you.
>
> Best Regards
> ---
> Koichi Suzuki
>
>
> 2014-03-26 22:00 GMT+09:00 Mason Sharp <ms...@tr...>:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Juned Khan <jkh...@gm...> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Mason
> >>
> >> That is correct mailing list helped me a lot, and i am very thankful to
> >> everyone.
> >>
> >> Yeah earlier i have asked about this requirement and received good
> >> response and advices
> >> but the point which you have mentioned that is noticeable, i can not
> >> ignore that
> >>
> >> i should think about this many points before moving ahead.
> >>
> >
> > BTW, I did not mean to discouarge you... I just did not want you to try
> to
> > use XC for a solution where it is not a good fit (or, not a good fit
> without
> > some custom development work) and end up saying that Postgres-XC is not
> good
> > in general.
> >
> > --
> > Mason Sharp
> >
> > TransLattice - http://www.translattice.com
> > Distributed and Clustered Database Solutions
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and
> their
> > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
> > _______________________________________________
> > Postgres-xc-general mailing list
> > Pos...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-general
> >
>



-- 
Thanks,
Juned Khan
iNextrix Technologies Pvt Ltd.
www.inextrix.com

Juned;

I'd like to know what kind of cluster you need to configure.  Also
would like to know if your application is OLTP, batch or analytic, as
well as what XC feature you'd like.   If it is OLTP, how much
transactions your are handling and if each transaction is as simple as
DBT-1/DBT-2 or bit more complicated as DBT-5.

You're trying to add datanodes so I imaged you're trying to start
small and then expand the cluster.   I'd like to know how your
application is growing in size and transaction.

Also, I'd like to know how much HA feature you need and what kind of
automatic failover tool you are planning to use.

They are always very important points when you choose most suitable
database for your application.

They are very important to think in advance and if you can share these
(not what is your application, but the above characteristics), we may
be able to provide more suitable information to you.

Best Regards
---
Koichi Suzuki


2014-03-26 22:00 GMT+09:00 Mason Sharp <ms...@tr...>:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Juned Khan <jkh...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mason
>>
>> That is correct mailing list helped me a lot, and i am very thankful to
>> everyone.
>>
>> Yeah earlier i have asked about this requirement and received good
>> response and advices
>> but the point which you have mentioned that is noticeable, i can not
>> ignore that
>>
>> i should think about this many points before moving ahead.
>>
>
> BTW, I did not mean to discouarge you... I just did not want you to try to
> use XC for a solution where it is not a good fit (or, not a good fit without
> some custom development work) and end up saying that Postgres-XC is not good
> in general.
>
> --
> Mason Sharp
>
> TransLattice - http://www.translattice.com
> Distributed and Clustered Database Solutions
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
> _______________________________________________
> Postgres-xc-general mailing list
> Pos...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-general
>