You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
(10) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(38) |
Jul
(103) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(66) |
Nov
(77) |
Dec
(20) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(78) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(118) |
Apr
(101) |
May
(103) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
|
Oct
(32) |
Nov
|
Dec
(9) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
(2) |
5
(1) |
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
(2) |
10
(1) |
11
(1) |
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
(2) |
|
21
(2) |
22
(4) |
23
(2) |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
From: Tomasz S. <str...@gm...> - 2013-07-22 21:11:05
|
Hi, Thanks for replies ;-), So are chances to add this feature into the project? Now i must use Pgpool-II to creating load balancing fuctionality ( in master-salve configuration :/), configuration master-master in this case will be much better... Regards, W dniu 2013-07-22 03:08, 鈴木 幸市 pisze: > Priority depends upon how it is demanded. Yes, so far, the priority > is not high. On the other hand, I expect the development effort is > not too much. > --- > Koichi Suzuki > > > > On 2013/07/21, at 22:46, Michael Paquier <mic...@gm... > <mailto:mic...@gm...>> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Tomasz Straszewski >> <str...@gm... <mailto:str...@gm...>> >> wrote: >> >> W dniu 2013-07-21 00:01, Michael Paquier pisze: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Tomasz Straszewski >>> <str...@gm... >>> <mailto:str...@gm...>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a question about transactions, i readed that >>> postgres-xc doesn't >>> support savepoints. What happens if transaction fails ? >>> >>> All the modifications done by this transaction are dropped on >>> all the nodes involved as it rollbacks. >>> -- >>> Michael >> >> Hi, >> I have one more question. >> >> Are plans to add functionality of creating save points in future >> releases ? >> >> It is not explicitly listed in the roadmap maintained by the main >> developers: >> http://postgres-xc.sourceforge.net/ >> And as I recall it is not a high priority. >> -- >> Michael >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics >> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics >> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. >> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ >> Postgres-xc-general mailing list >> Pos...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-general > |
|
From: Mason S. <ma...@st...> - 2013-07-22 11:48:02
|
Sent from my IPhone On Jul 21, 2013, at 9:08 PM, 鈴木 幸市<ko...@in...> wrote: > Priority depends upon how it is demanded. Yes, so far, the priority is not high. On the other hand, I expect the development effort is not too much. I agree, it is probably not bad. > --- > Koichi Suzuki > > > > On 2013/07/21, at 22:46, Michael Paquier <mic...@gm...> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Tomasz Straszewski <str...@gm...> wrote: >> W dniu 2013-07-21 00:01, Michael Paquier pisze: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Tomasz Straszewski <str...@gm...> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a question about transactions, i readed that postgres-xc doesn't >>> support savepoints. What happens if transaction fails ? >>> All the modifications done by this transaction are dropped on all the nodes involved as it rollbacks. >>> -- >>> Michael >> >> Hi, >> I have one more question. >> >> Are plans to add functionality of creating save points in future releases ? >> It is not explicitly listed in the roadmap maintained by the main developers: >> http://postgres-xc.sourceforge.net/ >> And as I recall it is not a high priority. >> -- >> Michael >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics >> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics >> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. >> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ >> Postgres-xc-general mailing list >> Pos...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-general > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Postgres-xc-general mailing list > Pos...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-general |
|
From: Amit K. <ami...@en...> - 2013-07-22 05:32:32
|
On 20 July 2013 20:54, Tomasz Straszewski <str...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about transactions, i readed that postgres-xc doesn't > support savepoints. What happens if transaction fails ? > Attempt to create savepoint will return "Not Supported" error, so the transaction aborts at the point where you create the savepoint. > > My application use postgreSQL and implement savepoint dao class with > create savepoint in database. I want to migrate from postgreSQL to > postgres-xc and i don't know what to do in this situation. > > Regards > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Postgres-xc-general mailing list > Pos...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-general > |
|
From: 鈴木 幸市 <ko...@in...> - 2013-07-22 01:08:35
|
Priority depends upon how it is demanded. Yes, so far, the priority is not high. On the other hand, I expect the development effort is not too much. --- Koichi Suzuki On 2013/07/21, at 22:46, Michael Paquier <mic...@gm...> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Tomasz Straszewski <str...@gm...> wrote: > W dniu 2013-07-21 00:01, Michael Paquier pisze: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Tomasz Straszewski <str...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a question about transactions, i readed that postgres-xc doesn't >> support savepoints. What happens if transaction fails ? >> All the modifications done by this transaction are dropped on all the nodes involved as it rollbacks. >> -- >> Michael > > Hi, > I have one more question. > > Are plans to add functionality of creating save points in future releases ? > It is not explicitly listed in the roadmap maintained by the main developers: > http://postgres-xc.sourceforge.net/ > And as I recall it is not a high priority. > -- > Michael > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > Postgres-xc-general mailing list > Pos...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/postgres-xc-general |