From: Koichi S. <koi...@gm...> - 2012-09-19 03:37:39
|
I understand the original requirement is to have "multi-master", essentially a copy. As Michael suggested, GTM should work to maintain all the master consistent. My suggestion will be for another application. I'd like community members to review the idea and give feedbacks anyway. Regards; ---------- Koichi Suzuki 2012/9/19 Michael Paquier <mic...@gm...>: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Koichi Suzuki <koi...@gm...> > wrote: >> >> Now, all the nodes in XC cluster is involved by GTM. Accessing GTM >> from remote could be suffered from the delay. I published an idea to >> divide Postgres-XC cluster into more than one subcluster as a solution >> for such application. >> >> Please take a look at http://postgresxc.wikia.com/wiki/Subclustering_XC >> >> Any comments are welcome. > > Even if those ideas are interesting, I doubt this can become a solution for > David as I am sure > his deadline is closer than the time necessary implement such a complicated > solution. > -- > Michael Paquier > http://michael.otacoo.com |