Thread: [Php-java-bridge-users] Testing uploaded versions

Hi Andre and others,

the new SF upload interface doesn`t support hidden releases anymore, does
it?


I have made a stupid mistake in the version 5.5.1 protocol parser. This has
been corrected in 5.5.2, I will check in the changed line tomorrow evening.

However, I think the 5.5.x branch needs some more time for internal tests.
Especially the RedHat and Debian versions, as both depend on a stable
upstream release.


Regards,
Jost Boekemeier

Hello,
I am still trying the new interface. It does not show correct downloads anymore,
also.
I guess the only workaround about hidden releases is to delete the files...
But the upload using rsync is being surprisingly fast. Anyway, the heavy
interface is using ftp as backend and detecting file types. I liked it more than
the old form.
Also, a suggestion could be to announce the "RC" releases at user list only from
cvs checkouts and building from source for some, say, 2 weeks. Then upload any
binaries.
Is this the best approach?
I will delete the 5.5.1-1 debian files.
Regards.
Andre Felipe

Hi Andre,

the $version variable in common.inc.php (in web.sf.net/.../pjb/include/) now
points to the most recent version, which is 5.4.4.2.

> Also, a suggestion could be to announce the "RC"
> releases at user list only from cvs checkouts and
> building from source for some say, 2 weeks. Then
> upload any binaries Is this the best approach?

Yes, I think so. Until sf.net gives us more control what is or is not
visible, we really have no other choice.

I have deleted the binary/5.5.2 and redhat/5.5.2 directories.

Regards,
Jost Boekemeier

1. Sep 2009 5:50 vorm. schrieb am <
php...@li...>:

Hello,
I am still trying the new interface. It does not show correct downloads
anymore,
also.
I guess the only workaround about hidden releases is to delete the files...
But the upload using rsync is being surprisingly fast. Anyway, the heavy
interface is using ftp as backend and detecting file types. I liked it more
than
the old form.
Also, a suggestion could be to announce the "RC" releases at user list only
from
cvs checkouts and building from source for some, say, 2 weeks. Then upload
any
binaries.
Is this the best approach?
I will delete the 5.5.1-1 debian files.
Regards.
Andre Felipe



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
php-java-bridge-users mailing list
php...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/php-java-bridge-users

Hi,

the regression in version 5.5.1 has been fixed in CVS. It has been tagged as
Release-5-5-2:

http://php-java-bridge.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/php-java-bridge/php-java-bridge/server/META-INF/java/Client.inc?r1=1.27&r2=1.28&view=patch

I am sorry for the inconvenience.


Regards,
Jost Boekemeier