You can subscribe to this list here.
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(111) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(72) |
Dec
(42) |
2006 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(63) |
Dec
(37) |
2007 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(71) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(71) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(56) |
2008 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(77) |
Mar
(104) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(86) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(93) |
2009 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(135) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(71) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(20) |
2010 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(50) |
Mar
(35) |
Apr
(48) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(84) |
Jul
(38) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(18) |
2011 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(25) |
2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(7) |
2013 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(10) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
(1) |
2
(2) |
3
(1) |
4
(1) |
5
|
6
(2) |
7
(3) |
8
(2) |
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
(1) |
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
(2) |
19
(2) |
20
|
21
|
22
(1) |
23
|
24
(3) |
25
(3) |
26
(4) |
27
(1) |
28
|
29
(6) |
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
From: <php...@li...> - 2010-03-19 11:04:06
|
> ... contains sensitive info Okay. I will add a new JAVA_HOST syntax for PHP/Java Bridge version 6.1.1: scheme://host:port Example which connects to the back end https://timon:8443/JavaBridge/servlet.phpjavabridge: <?php define ("JAVA_HOSTS", "ssl://timon:8443"); define ("JAVA_SERVLET", "/JavaBridge/servlet.phpjavabridge"); require_once("java/Java.inc"); ... ?> As a workaround please edit Java.inc, search for fsockopen and change the fsockopen call to: fsockopen("ssl://..."); Regards, Jost Bökemeier On 3/19/10, php...@li... <php...@li...> wrote: > On 18/03/2010 16:54, php...@li... wrote: >> Hi Ian, >> >> if I understand you correctly, you want to tunnel the PHP/Java Bridge >> protocol through a secure channel: >> >> inet client <--HTTP--> apache/php <--PJB over SSL--> tomcat/java >> >> This feature can be implemented, of course. But I don't understand why >> this could be useful. Isn't it possible to use two physical network >> interfaces? One for the HTTP communication and another one for the >> PJB communication? >> >> >> Regards, >> Jost Bökemeier > > Hi, > > The tomcat server will used to access a Java SDK which implements a > particular authorisation scheme for a bank (I can't go into too much > detail). > > This set of functions will be accessed by multiple PHP servers all > running customer facing websites. The PJB <--> Tomcat communication > will contains sensitive info (cc numbers etc.) and will actually run > over a separative back end network. But even so I would like it > encrypted just in case. It will also keep the PCI auditors happy. > > Regards > > Ian > -- > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > php-java-bridge-users mailing list > php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/php-java-bridge-users > |
From: <php...@li...> - 2010-03-19 09:26:30
|
On 18/03/2010 16:54, php...@li... wrote: > Hi Ian, > > if I understand you correctly, you want to tunnel the PHP/Java Bridge > protocol through a secure channel: > > inet client <--HTTP--> apache/php <--PJB over SSL--> tomcat/java > > This feature can be implemented, of course. But I don't understand why > this could be useful. Isn't it possible to use two physical network > interfaces? One for the HTTP communication and another one for the > PJB communication? > > > Regards, > Jost Bökemeier Hi, The tomcat server will used to access a Java SDK which implements a particular authorisation scheme for a bank (I can't go into too much detail). This set of functions will be accessed by multiple PHP servers all running customer facing websites. The PJB <--> Tomcat communication will contains sensitive info (cc numbers etc.) and will actually run over a separative back end network. But even so I would like it encrypted just in case. It will also keep the PCI auditors happy. Regards Ian -- |