|
From: Sandro T. <mo...@de...> - 2011-01-18 18:30:17
|
Hi, On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 15:00, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > I'm not sure PIL enters into it -- there shouldn't be any code path > involving PIL in that case. > > I think this a case where the image comparison tolerance needs to be > increased. You would do this be passing a "tol" parameter to the > image_comparison decorator on the pcolormesh test. The default is 1e-3, > but it should be conservatively increased until the test passes. You > can perform this experiment yourself, or attach the result image for the > test to this list and I can experiment to find a correct value. I'm attaching the images, just for reference; as you can see, the difference is very tiny and with a tolerance of 0.02 I was able to pass the test (RMS Value: 0.0116511801977). Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi |