You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(205) |
May
(184) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(223) |
2005 |
Jan
(184) |
Feb
(267) |
Mar
(214) |
Apr
(286) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(299) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(283) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(293) |
Nov
(232) |
Dec
(203) |
2006 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(358) |
Mar
(403) |
Apr
(313) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(281) |
Jul
(316) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(279) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(315) |
Dec
(345) |
2007 |
Jan
(260) |
Feb
(323) |
Mar
(340) |
Apr
(319) |
May
(290) |
Jun
(296) |
Jul
(221) |
Aug
(292) |
Sep
(242) |
Oct
(248) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(332) |
2008 |
Jan
(312) |
Feb
(359) |
Mar
(454) |
Apr
(287) |
May
(340) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(403) |
Aug
(324) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(385) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(437) |
2009 |
Jan
(500) |
Feb
(301) |
Mar
(409) |
Apr
(486) |
May
(545) |
Jun
(391) |
Jul
(518) |
Aug
(497) |
Sep
(492) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(357) |
Dec
(310) |
2010 |
Jan
(371) |
Feb
(657) |
Mar
(519) |
Apr
(432) |
May
(312) |
Jun
(416) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(386) |
Sep
(419) |
Oct
(435) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(202) |
2011 |
Jan
(321) |
Feb
(413) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(215) |
May
(284) |
Jun
(203) |
Jul
(207) |
Aug
(314) |
Sep
(321) |
Oct
(259) |
Nov
(347) |
Dec
(209) |
2012 |
Jan
(322) |
Feb
(414) |
Mar
(377) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(295) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(276) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(108) |
2013 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(204) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2014 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(96) |
2015 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(119) |
Jun
(124) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(9) |
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(20) |
2
(21) |
3
(21) |
4
(14) |
5
(8) |
6
(12) |
7
(16) |
8
(27) |
9
(39) |
10
(19) |
11
(12) |
12
(3) |
13
(3) |
14
(18) |
15
(14) |
16
(6) |
17
(7) |
18
(19) |
19
(5) |
20
(8) |
21
(24) |
22
(42) |
23
(12) |
24
(11) |
25
(16) |
26
(2) |
27
(4) |
28
(10) |
|
|
|
|
|
From: Daniel M. <dan...@go...> - 2011-02-26 14:41:36
|
I have slightly modified the example from http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/faq/howto_faq.html#automatically-make-room-for-tick-labels in order to demonstrate what I mean. It works with the manual string tick labels but not with regular auto-generated numerical ones. Maybe someone knows how to fix this? And I *really* think this should work automatically. As a compromise, maybe an rcParam would help in order to keep the current dumb behavior... Thanks in advance, Daniel import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import matplotlib.transforms as mtransforms fig = plt.figure(figsize=(5,3)) ax = fig.add_subplot(111) #ax.plot(range(10)) #ax.set_yticks((2,5,7)) #labels = ax.set_yticklabels(('really, really, really', 'long', 'labels')) ax.plot(range(100),[100000]*100) labels = ax.get_yticklabels() def on_draw(event): bboxes = [] for label in labels: bbox = label.get_window_extent() print bbox # the figure transform goes from relative coords->pixels and we # want the inverse of that bboxi = bbox.inverse_transformed(fig.transFigure) bboxes.append(bboxi) # this is the bbox that bounds all the bboxes, again in relative # figure coords bbox = mtransforms.Bbox.union(bboxes) if fig.subplotpars.left < bbox.width: # we need to move it over fig.subplots_adjust(left=1.1*bbox.width) # pad a little fig.canvas.draw() return False fig.canvas.mpl_connect('draw_event', on_draw) plt.show() |
From: Benjamin R. <ben...@ou...> - 2011-02-26 00:17:40
|
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Philipp A. <fly...@we...> wrote: > 2011/2/25 Philipp A. <fly...@we...> > > 2011/2/25 Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> >> >>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Philipp A. <fly...@we...> wrote: >>> >>>> hi, >>>> Axes3D from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d does not override set_*ticklabels. >>>> this bug<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2874110&group_id=80706&atid=560720>is about the issue. >>>> to get a crude replacement, i have to do the following: >>>> >>>> for x, s in enumerate(ticks): >>>>> ax.text3D(x, -.1, -.5, s) >>>>> for a in ax.w_xaxis.get_ticklabels(): >>>>> a.set_visible(False) >>>>> >>>> >>>> is there a way to do better and hack my values into the real tick >>>> labels (i bet they are drawn internally the same as text3D, but there is no >>>> way to access the values)? >>>> >>>> >>> In matplotlib in the development branch, I am able to call >>> ax.w_xaxis.set_ticklabels() (or ax.w_yaxis, or ax.w_zaxis) and have the >>> ticks show up appropriately. I have not tested earlier versions of >>> matplotlib, though. Which version are you using? >>> >>> Admittedly, the control of the ticks is very poor in mplot3d. I hope to >>> improve that over the next several months. >>> >>> Ben Root >>> >> >> i use 0.99.3 both in university and at home, but somehow at home, >> matplotlib complains about ValueError: Unknown projection '3d' at home. >> >> i’ll try 1.0.1 and report if it works. >> > > update: i’ll see if a dev build does the trick tomorrow, as a local build > of 1.0.1 doesn’t show the x/yticklabels and there doesn’t exist a function > named set_zticklabels. > Phillipp, The ability to call ax = fig.gca(projection='3d') was new for version 1.0.0. This morning, I also noticed that functions like "set_zticklabels()" did not exist. I currently have a patch submitted for that and it should be merged into the git repository tonight. In the meantime, you can always do something like: ax.w_zaxis.set_ticklabels() The functions like ax.set_zticks() merely call that function for the appropriate axis. Ben Root |